I ask because as a millennial who grew up on the prequel trilogy, there’s a sense of nostalgia for it despite its flaws, and it’s been lovingly memed and we’ve seen some redemption for how Gen X and the boomers treated Hayden Christensen and Ahmed Best for things outside their controls. So given all that I was just curious how those of you who were “kids” when the sequels came out view them without the baggage us older fans have.
This thread is f****** hilarious with how many people are getting the wrong trilogy lmao
91
KhivaMar 24, 2026
+18
There is no stopping prequel stans.
18
Previous_Spinach_168Mar 24, 2026
+128
It’s funny how most of the comments in this thread are about the prequels. I don’t think a ton of kids who grew up with the sequels are having this conversation yet.
Seems like it took the PT like 17 or so years before the prequel memes phenomenon started to gain traction and they became reappraised to some extent.
At that rate, it won’t be until 2032 until we start seeing something somewhat similar happen with the ST. What form of reappraisal those films take will no doubt vary starkly, but I just don’t think we’re there yet.
128
StepjamMar 24, 2026
+72
I still think the prequels are bad. I'm not gonna let nostalgia blind me.
Mind you, they aren't completely without redeeming points (I do still enjoy that they didn't just rehash the planets from the original trilogy but came up with a variety of new locations that were visually interesting), but I remembered loving Revenge of the Sith when I saw it in theaters in 8th grade. When I saw it on TV again over a decade later, I was gobsmacked by how wooden the acting was. I didn't remember it being that awkward at all. It was bad.
72
DnashotgunMar 24, 2026
+39
The prequels are bad, but at minimum you can see the ideas and the passion that was there to do something different from the original trilogy and expand the world. The sequel trilogy just feels like it constantly contradicts itself and the universally agreed "best" one is largely a reskin of the original Star Wars.
39
CaBBaGe_isLaNDMar 24, 2026
+6
The prequels are a good story with some terrible acting. The sequels are great acting with a terrible story.
I don't think the sequels will age as well as people around here pretend like they will. And it's because you can get past mediocre acting. It just becomes kinda campy. You can't get past bad storytelling. But we will see, I guess.
6
GoSkers29Mar 24, 2026
+6
They made the sequel trilogy without a plan for the overall story arc. Which blows my f****** mind. Such a massive opportunity and they set themselves up to fail right away.
6
KhivaMar 24, 2026
+1
They hired a guy who has a literal Ted Talk about not having a plan.
Honestly that one is on you.
1
Prudent_Entrance_700Mar 24, 2026
+1
There is no universally agreed best one. There are tons of Last Jedi truthers out there myself included. There is only a universally agreed upon worst one
1
xXSpookyXxMar 25, 2026
+1
It felt like the prequels were made for a new generation of kids, and whatever flaws they may have in their own right, were judged at the time by an audience that grew up with the original trilogy. The sequels felt like they were algorithmically created to cater to the original audience who criticized the prequels. I'd be shocked if children made up a substantial audience for the sequel trilogy. I know my own son only saw the movies because I dragged him along to them.
The original trilogy worked because when the first movie was made there wasn't an expectation it was going to be a pop culture defining hit. The prequels struggled to make a story that lived up to the expectations the success of the first trilogy put. The sequels tried to soullessly emulate the high notes the first movies had.
1
BattlinBudMar 24, 2026
+3
Revenge of the Sith is the one prequel I have a soft spot for, it's not as good as I thought it was when I was 13, but it IS still the best and most entertaining of the prequels by a mile. The Phantom Menace feels like it's actively trying to make it difficult for the audience to understand the plot, for absolutely no reason. It's maddening. Especially when you compare it to A New Hope, which feels like a freaking *blueprint* for how to dole out exposition in a way that progresses naturally, keeps the audience engaged, and doesn't confuse them.
3
Picasso5Mar 24, 2026
+5
I think the big mistake of the prequels was that they were made for kids.
5
BattlinBudMar 24, 2026
+1
But WERE they, though? As a kid, I couldn't follow at least half of what was going on in them. Even as an adult they're still pretty obtuse. People say "Star Wars is made for kids" but I've always felt the original trilogy was made for people of all ages, adults can enjoy them but they're simple enough that kids can follow the plot too. A New Hope is a very straightforward adventure movie: rescue the princess, blow up the Death Star. Simple. I appreciate the fact that George Lucas WANTED to try something a little more complex and reflective of real-world politics in the prequels, but besides the fact that the execution left a lot to be desired, they just don't feel like they even know what audience they're trying to aim for. Half of it IS stuff for kids, like Anakin pod racing and Jar Jar being silly, but the other half is overly-complex political mumbo-jumbo that even now I couldn't remember most of if you put a gun to my head.
1
Picasso5Mar 24, 2026
A New Hope wasn't really made "for all ages", it was just a good movie. It didn't target a demographic (except for the toys that came after), where I feel the prequels absolutely did.
Now THAT'S Podracing!
0
TheTresStateAreaMar 24, 2026
+6
The prequels gave us Clone Wars TAS and the rise of Dave Filoni. So I'll always appreciates it for that.
6
Previous_Spinach_168Mar 24, 2026
+3
I mean, I think the Prequels are pretty sub-par and I was 2 when they first started releasing, so some folks slip through the cracks. I acknowledge I’m in the minority in my generation, tho. Most of the people I talk to about them in my age range have fond memories of them.
3
HowMany_MoreTimesMar 24, 2026
+2
I was 6 when the Phantom Menace came out. I both have fond memories of the prequels and acknowledge that they're not good movies for the most part. They do have some really great moments; mostly the lightsaber fights, but are generally poorly written and suffer from George Lucas having nobody to filter his ideas.
2
aTrustfulFriendMar 24, 2026
+1
seems you were the target demograph. they were designed to sell toys.
1
dbu8554Mar 26, 2026
+1
At the end of the day the prequels were fun. They are made for a certain demographic and they are fun. The sequels were missing the fun.
1
LordDustyMar 24, 2026
+19
Kids who grew up with the sequels are in their teens, if not early 20s by now. And if you consider that people, especially kids, spend more time online and at a younger age than they used to, if they aren't having these conversations now then its unlikely things will change that much by 2032.
Online conversation is very different now to what it was 20 years ago so you can't really compare it in the same way or expect it to happen the same way.
19
KrailMar 24, 2026
+11
I also wonder if Star Wars just wasn't that big a deal in the culture for 2010's kids the way it was for 80's and 90's kids.
11
alQamarMar 24, 2026
+4
It wasn’t. It was still huuuge when I grew up in the eighties and then coming back in the 2000s. My kids who where the perfect age to become fans when the sequels came out never had any interest in it aside from Lego Star Wars.
4
Previous_Spinach_168Mar 24, 2026
+20
TFA just celebrated its 10 year anniversary a few months ago. For the kids who *truly* grew up with those films, i.e. the ones who won’t really remember a world pre-Sequels, they’re still in elementary and middle school. Younger, even, because as time goes on, we will start seeing generations of kids growing up who don’t delineate between the Lucas era (OT-PT) and Disney era (ST-Mando), the way Millennials and Gen Z do. Hard to believe for us old heads, but then if you told certain Gen X and Elder Millennials that the PT would eventually be lumped in with the OT, they’d look at you like you were Jar Jar Binks stepping in Eopie shit.
Point being the folks we’re actually talking about — the analog to the PT revisionist crowd — is probably not the primary demographic of this subreddit.
As I said, it took the PT a good 17 or so years before discourse online began to turn in their favor. That’s when kids who *truly* grew up with those movies — kids who don’t really remember a time pre-Prequels — began dominating online discourse. I don’t think we’re there with the Sequels yet.
If things don’t start shifting by the early 2030s, I’ll eat crow. But if you told the internet in 2009 that by the end of the next decade, Mr. Plinkett’s *Phantom Menace* review would be going out of style and there’d be dorks defending Anakin complaining about sand, well, I already did Eopie line.
20
KhivaMar 24, 2026
+7
My suspicion is that the prequels benefited from still existing in the monoculture, and that the "kids" who grew up with the prequels were replaced by kids who had other options, like Marvel and Fortnite, to occupy their childhood fantasies.
Plus the prequels are so bad, they're deeply memeable. Only Rise really and truly sinks to their level, gifting us the "_Somehow, X returned_" meme that as its lasting legacy.
7
DnashotgunMar 24, 2026
+1
The sequel trilogy imploding also played a big role in prequels revision imo. Like you said, at least the prequels had a so bad its good kind of vibe, the sequel trilogy is just bad to aggresively mediorce
1
Previous_Spinach_168Mar 24, 2026
There’s def something to the monocultural thing, although we were already seeing that fracture when the PT was coming out with plenty of fantasy/sci-fi adjacent media competing with it — *Harry Potter, Lord of the Rings, Spider-Man, Batman, Pirates of the Caribbean,* etc. The ironic thing is that glut of genre fare owed a great debt to the success of the Original Trilogy, which spawned a resurgence in high concept entertainment meant to appeal to juveniles and grown adults’ sense of juvenilia.
The fractures had only deepened by the time the ST began coming out. Ep. IX just barely managed to slip in before COVID happened and changed things forever.
0
LordDustyMar 24, 2026
+3
> As I said, it took the PT a good 17 or so years before discourse online began to turn in their favour
And yet I would say that there was plenty of signs much earlier than this that the prequels at the very least had the potential for a positive shift of popularity.
For all the criticisms and loud critics of the prequels, those films were still culturally massive and had a huge positive impact even outside of the films. Toys, videogames, books, comics, etc set in that era were immensely popular and that was down to those films creating as many (if not plenty more) well loved moments and characters and designs that fans happily embraced over the years long before your '17 years later' timeframe.
This is something I've yet to see at all with the the sequels. There seems to be relatively little hype or excitement around the positive parts of those films, not in the same way there was for the prequels. Seeing more of the likes of Rey or Kylo, or playing games set in the era of Resistance vs First Order doesn't really seem to draw the same level of interest that the likes of Maul or Grievous or Clone Wars had.
Maybe 17 years is the date for the start of change for the sequels, but so far it hasn't held onto anywhere near the same interest or excitement at 10 years that the prequels had, so I feel it would have to improve from a far more precarious position to make any real obvious impact
3
Previous_Spinach_168Mar 24, 2026
+1
Yeah, the merchandising has been way different for the PT compared to the ST, no doubt about that. But also merchandising as a whole is way different in the late 2010s/2020s than it was in the late 90s/early 2000s, isn’t it?
On top of that, the Disney marketing strategy has been far more risk averse than Lucas ever was. And nowhere near as toyetic as his instincts. Had Disney owned SW when the PT was coming out, it’s safe to say they would’ve creatively pivoted given the critical/popular reception of the time — a show like TCW might not’ve ever gotten off the ground.
I don’t think any of this really says anything about the movies themselves. After all, the way we even *talk* about movies has shifted massively toward reactionary voices and algorithms encouraging certain types of takes to generate the most revenue. In part, negative reactions to the PT helped spur these changes and pave the way for the cottage industry of hate videos that sprang up especially in the wake of TLJ releasing in 2017.
Still, there are signs of enthusiasm. I see little girls and boys dressed as Rey and Kylo for Halloween every year. The Hunt of Ben Solo has gained relatively popular attention despite it being a Hail Mary premise about an already dead character. And as actors like John Boyega talk returning to the series one day, fans seem eager to “give them another chance” and “see them done justice”. All sentiments I saw expressed about prequel era actors and characters. I don’t think things are as apathetic toward the sequels as you make them out to be, but they also have less of a negative reception than the prequels to bounce back from if we’re being honest with ourselves.
My prediction is that as we move into the next phase of theatrical SW releases, fans will take issue with them for whatever reason (too much AI, or too bland, or too different, or too low stakes, etc.) and begin to think back on the “old days” with more fondness — the days of Disney’s first run of theatrical films, including the sequels. This also happens to correspond with the 2030s being around the corner. Part of the prequel resurgence has to do with Disney releasing new films, I’m convinced. Something new to hate on will help the ST.
1
LordDustyMar 24, 2026
+1
I don't think Disney and Lucas are too different when it comes to pushing for certain elements. They might do it in different ways but Disney is no stranger to milking anything they consider popular and profitable dry, just look at Grogu for instance. If Disney had even the hint that elements from the sequels were popular they wouldn't have hesitated in the slightest to have churned that stuff out but post-RoS they shut down on it hard, resorting to vague hints and (so far) fruitless teases of future projects.
> The Hunt of Ben Solo has gained relatively popular attention
It gained its 15 minutes of attention but since then very little outside of a handful of desperate Reylos.
> and as actors like John Boyega talk returning to the series one day, fans seem eager to “give them another chance” and “see them done justice”.
An actor, desperate for money makes a few comments and most comments are 'I wish the sequels did his character better' isn't exactly convincing enthusiasm to see more.
> but they also have less of a negative reception than the prequels
You say that and yet there seems to be enough negativity around them for people to constantly fret about 'hate' or 'rage-bait' criticism.
> My prediction is that as we move into the next phase of theatrical SW releases... and begin to think back on the “old days” with more fondness — the days of Disney’s first run of theatrical films, including the sequels... Something new to hate on will help the ST.
I can't see it personally. People already lump in failures like Acolyte or BoBF with the sequels, and more failures and problems will just go into the growing pile of 'Disneys SW disasters' not in anyway making the sequels look any better. This is especially true now that you have big creative successes like Andor. Anything not up to that standard will just be seen as typical Disney rubbish.
1
Previous_Spinach_168Mar 24, 2026
-1
And if Disney had been in charge of the PT when critics were panning them and fans were sending death threats to actors, they would’ve tamped down on that era as well. They’re far more feckless than Lucas ever was. They shy away from controversy where Lucas soldiered on bc the dude had a vision.
Hunt for Ben Solo continues to generate attention on the main sub and beyond. I believe there was a story circulating just this past week about Soderbergh talking about it. It’s gone beyond 15 mins and is becoming something akin to Snyder fans wanting a Snyder JL cut. With leadership shakeups at LucasFilm and Disney, it’s no surprise folks are holding out hope that Adam Driver returns to the role, especially given how popular he was as Kylo Ren.
Oh, do you know something about Boyega’s financial situation that we don’t know? Do enlighten us how he desperately needs the paycheck.
Your fourth point is a non-sequitur. The sequels can be less hated than the prequels were and still be over-hated and targeted for unfair reasons.
I don’t really see the D+ era thought of as the same as the theatrical era. It’s definitely had a different impact on folks’ perception of the IP than when it was on the silver screen, which is its true home. A better analog for people to compare the ST to will be this newest crop of SW films starting with Mando & Grogu. We’ll see how those turn out, but new SW film releases famously fare poorly with the older, vocal fans.
-1
webshellkanuckleheadMar 24, 2026
+1
Your math isn’t mathing… I was a late teenager when the sequels were coming out, now in my early 20s.
1
LordDustyMar 24, 2026
+1
Depends on your definition of 'kid' and 'early 20s'.
I consider 'kid' to potentially cover those up to 11-12 and considering TFA came out late 2015, being in the early 20s is perfectly reasonable for those 'kids' who grew up with the sequels
1
Previous_Spinach_168Mar 24, 2026
The bigger issue is parsing out what “grew up with” actually means. I turned 12 in 2009, the year that *Avatar* came out. I distinctly remember it releasing and me watching it in theaters.
Would I say I “grew up with it” in the same sense that “I grew up with” *The Phantom Menace*, a movie that released when I wasn’t even 2? Not at all.
Another way to look at it: Anakin Skywalker was 9 years old in the aforementioned *Phantom Menace*, and *that* was considered too old to begin training because his mind wasn’t as plastic as the Jedi wanted.
Folks are having different conversations depending on what they mean by “growing up with” something.
0
LordDustyMar 24, 2026
+1
There's a difference between 'growing up' with one film and growing up with a collection of films released over half a decade or more, and thats not including the time before and after you spend thinking about it, playing with toys, reading books, drawing art about it, etc.
And all of that could include any portion of time for anything from your earliest memories to something in your mid/late teens. I could say I grew up on Thomas the Tank Engine even if that only covered me from 2 to 5 years old, or I grew up playing a certain sport even though I only started playing it when I was 9 up to finishing school at 18.
I would say 'growing up with' covers a great deal of time during your development from a young toddler up until you consider yourself an adult, so its not unreasonable to consider that those who 'grew up with' the sequels to already be in their early 20s
1
Previous_Spinach_168Mar 24, 2026
+1
Yes. I literally say that in my comment lol. The point is that “growing up with” something can mean very different things to people because it’s not specific — saying you grew up with Thomas the Tank Engine is very different (IMO) to saying you grew up, for example, skateboarding (something that kids usually pick up when they’re pre-teens/teenagers).
Maybe the better question is what is formative to our growth? As we get older, our minds are less plastic and it becomes harder for things to make an impression. Again, I’ll point to the difference inherent in “growing up with” something you first encounter before you can even form memories and “growing up with” something on the cusp of puberty.
I’m not saying your definition is “unreasonable” — I’m saying it’s different from the analogy I’m drawing between kids who grew up with the PT taking 17 years to begin shifting online discourse in their favor and the kids currently growing up with the ST not being given those corresponding 17 years — bc said trilogy of films are no older than 10.
Feel free to jump the gun and write the movies and the generations currently growing up with them off, but I say give it another half dozen or so years. No need to be hasty if you end up being right, anyway.
1
LordDustyMar 24, 2026
+1
I think its wrong to single out the kids who 'truly' grew up with the films as the main example of change in perception. That would be like assuming that the only people whose opinions on the prequels caused the change are those born late 90s early 2000s, and ignoring those who were older kids at its release or even older still.
The change in the perception of the prequels (particularly online) was not solely caused by these 'true' prequel kids growing up but a wide combination of reasons, and again my point considering the wider prevalence of being online and at an earlier age means that you cannot compare the timeframe of these events. Sequel kids will have an impact of online discussions around those films much earlier than you want to believe and 17 years is no longer a reasonable period of time to use as a comparison.
1
Previous_Spinach_168Mar 24, 2026
+1
Nah, I think it’s the correct assumption. Why would you think elder Millennials and Gen X were the folks shifting the online discussion right as the demo that actually grew up with the Prequels — in the sense that they don’t really a remember a world pre-Prequels — were coming of age and joining online discourse? Seems like a convenient thing to believe on your part.
The consensus online is that this shift happened in the mid-2010s not because the folks who hated the PT when it came out *changed their mind* but because the audience for whom the PT was formative *began to dominate the discourse through sheer volume.*
That simply hasn’t happened for the ST. Not on this sub or most of Reddit, anyways.
1
LordDustyMar 24, 2026
> Why would you think elder Millennials and Gen X were the folks shifting the online discussion right as the demo that actually grew up with the Prequels
Probably because I'm part of that demographic and I know first hand that you are targeting this prequel love age range far too young and are underestimating how the formation of online discourse shifted post 2010.
0
WorkAccount6Mar 24, 2026
+5
It was a lot sooner than 17 years, I recall prequel memes being a pretty popular thing around 2009.
The newer films likely won't ever have the same meme potential because the characters are less iconic, the dialogue is far more confined within a template and less quotable, and the films on a whole are just far less beloved. Also the format for memes in general has shifted since then.
5
DARDAN0SMar 24, 2026
+3
I really don't agree with this notion that people only came to appreciate the prequels because of memes. People appreciate (and have always appreciated) the prequels because they depicted an interesting time period and build a really great world that spawned an entire mini industry of video games, novels, comics, action figures, and countless other tie in materials.
Whatever you think of them as movies themselves, they were the foundation of all of that. I don't particularly care for them as individual pieces of entertainment personally, but how could I begrudge their place in the narrative when they've added so much great content to the Star Wars universe and acted as the founded for many of my favourite stories in it?
That's why the sequels won't see the same love a decade or two down the line. They dont have any of that. They're far too insular and disjointed, and relied far too much on nostalgia to build a world interesting enough to support that kind of extended media landscape.
3
aTrustfulFriendMar 24, 2026
+3
The PT was always memed. even had a great SNL skit. we won't get the same love for the ST. The "they fly now?" and such are not flattering jokes, in fact the opposite and are usually mentioned in derision.
3
Previous_Spinach_168Mar 24, 2026
+3
The PT was also memed in derision before that derision turned into ironic enjoyment and finally unironic adoration. It’s a form of Stockholm syndrome brought about by intimate familiarity and early exposure.
We will live to see kids currently growing up with Episode IX say it’s their favorite in the saga. It’s only a matter of time.
3
aTrustfulFriendMar 24, 2026
-3
Nah we always had good fun with the prequels. they're in a so bad theyre good category. cant be said for the ST. context is similar but still has defining differences.
-3
Previous_Spinach_168Mar 24, 2026
-1
Man, when I watch, e.g. the Plinkett Prequel reviews, I don’t get the sense that the dude’s having “good fun” with those movies. He seems to genuinely despise them.
-1
aTrustfulFriendMar 24, 2026
I loved the plinkett reviews. I've been watching redlettermedia since 2011. Mike has a complicated relationship with Star Wars. He also hates the Star Trek TNG movies, but is one of the biggest TNG fans out there. You can have nuanced opinions on media
0
Previous_Spinach_168Mar 24, 2026
+2
Again, watching the Plinkett reviews, I don’t get a sense that Mike actually likes the Prequels. At least, not when he made those reviews.
2
aTrustfulFriendMar 24, 2026
+1
Those reviews are half jokes and half genuine annoyance. Their main purpose is comedy.
Mike doesnt like the prequels. Moving on, the prequels were being memed on long before the plinkett reviews were a thing. I was there for it, i frequented Galaxies and IGN forums during their heyday around 2005
1
Previous_Spinach_168Mar 24, 2026
Comedy is *one* of the Plinkett reviews’ purposes. Not sure it’s up to you to determine their main purpose.
What do you mean by “memed on”? Like the way they are now? As in folks unironically loving saying “hello there” and “I don’t like sand” to one another, or in the sense that folks were clowning on them? Because I remember the prequels being mostly disliked by the older crowd; them quoting the films was their version of taking the piss, not paying homage.
0
aTrustfulFriendMar 24, 2026
+2
the ST will never have the same level of interaction. They dont have near the cultural impact.
2
GameMusicMar 24, 2026
+2
i think this belief is delusional and offensive
people are just assuming that the sequels would get rehabilitated by those who watched as kids why?
because of the prequel rehabilitation? that is attempting to form a pattern on a single sample and totally ignoring quality and the reason for that rehabilitation
prequel rehabilitation pretty much coincided with the release of episode 8 it was very sudden
disney is banking people will buy any slop which released under the brand if you just tap childhood experience but that is lazy and corporate arrogance because of not admitting they sold a giant turd
the difference here is the prequel trilogy had decent nerd fuel with worldbuilding and expanded media to develop everything
they built their narrative around characters from the first trilogy
it had some creative ideas an actual plot and other qualities to rehabilitate
but the sequels consist of
a rehash setting up mystery boxes
a movie that seemed to have no purpose other than subverting tropes
a movie that seemed to exist primarily for retconning episode 8 in the dumbest way
and each movie broke the franchise with something that undercut everything the rebels did (empire coming back bigger somehow, mischaracterizing luke, rarely having the cast interact, bringing back palpatine)
there is no plot that joins them the whole thing is cynical corporate slop
they built their narrative around original characters do not steal
rey does everything luke and han can but better without struggle and teases dark side potential and that whole plot never develops
finn had potential with coming from stormtroopers but they never use that either and every movie tries something completely contradictory with him
poe was just stupid and unlikeable
disney believed they could just recreate bottled lightning with a new merchandisable cast simply by putting the brand on it and disrespecting everything else about the franchise
2
Previous_Spinach_168Mar 24, 2026
+2
It’s amazing how much this comment would make sense for the prequels if you just changed a few words.
2
GameMusicMar 24, 2026
+3
try it
include which positive aspects you think will earn rehabilitation
also the movies were built with obi wan and anakin and palpatine and yoda as the focus
and much of the fandom recognizes the issues with the movies and tends to agree the first trilogy is better
3
free_movie_theoriesMar 24, 2026
+1
For Christ's holy sake, the Prequels are about how a fascist government can rise from a democracy. They tell that story very clearly, and it's *a pretty damn relevant thing to talk about too*.
My Gen X bretheren didn't want a political intrigue series, they wanted an adventure series and so they shat all over those movies just because the dialogue is (admittedly) terrible.
But at least it was f****** *about something*. 7-9 are not about a goddamn thing.
1
FireTheLaserBeamMar 24, 2026
+46
I’ll never forgive them for not having all three legacy characters interact with each other one last time. They had that chance and totally blew it and I’ll never ever forgive them for it.
46
redgroupclanMar 24, 2026
+21
Especially since so much of the trilogy was nostalgia bait.
21
orwllMar 24, 2026
+14
This is the craziest thing to me. Everything Disney Star Wars has made has revolved around nostalgia baiting every prop, every side character and every throwaway line from the original trilogy.
But the three main stars didn't even get one single scene. It's 10 years later and like I still can't believe it.
14
f-ingsteveglansbergMar 24, 2026
+3
Because when TLJ released and wasn't filled with nostalgia bait, people hated it. TRoS was an answer to that. It's the exact example of audiences don't know what they want.
3
ifinallyreallyredditMar 24, 2026
+1
They didn't even have all three *new* characters interact with each other.
1
poopypoopy1125Mar 24, 2026
+56
I watched the Force Awakens in theaters when I was 8 and I still like it. But the other two? Meh
The Last Jedi is filled with missed opportunities while The Rise of Skywalker went too far in appeasing those who disliked TLJ. Couldn't Rey just have been a nobody? She did not need to be Palpatine's daughter. Speaking of whom, Palpatine returning is so f****** bullshit
56
7tenthsMar 24, 2026
+23
Returning in f****** fornite.
23
RunDNAMar 24, 2026
+3
Tarantino recently debuted a whole new animated sequence for Kill Bill in Fortnite.
3
eightdollarbeerMar 24, 2026
+9
I liked Force Awakens when it came out but it setup so many loose threads and unanswered questions that it’s hard to enjoy it as a standalone film so I never rewatch it. Compared to something like Jurassic World, where the first one was decent and the rest of the trilogy was trash, but you can still enjoy the first one on its own
9
KhivaMar 24, 2026
+5
Hire the guy who literally gives a speech that anybody can view about how his style is to just toss out random mysteries and that he doesn't care what's inside. Said guy proceeds to make a film and shart mystery boxes all over the place.
Mystery boxes turn out to be unrewarding.
Man who would have thought.
5
FurryYokelMar 24, 2026
+3
I think some of the hate over TLJ was from viewers who were fooled by the mystery boxes in TFA.
They believed there would be a payoff and they were pissed when there wasn’t. Meanwhile, those of us who suffered through Lost…
3
f-ingsteveglansbergMar 24, 2026
+3
But the payoff would have always been something boring. Like her being related to Paps. Having her as a nobody and ending moving the series away from Skywalkers should have been what the sequels were about.
3
FurryYokelMar 24, 2026
+1
That’s the thing: JJ Abrams’ whole thing is making it look like there’s an intriguing mystery, when he really just has no idea where he’s going. It was always going to be disappointing.
1
KhivaMar 24, 2026
+2
> I think some of the hate over TLJ was from viewers who were fooled by the mystery boxes in TFA.
I'm convinced of this also.
>They believed there would be a payoff and they were pissed when there wasn’t. Meanwhile, those of us who suffered through Lost…
And it was this experience that led me to expecta absolutely nothing from JJ Abrams. I still can't believe people were suckered by it.
2
f-ingsteveglansbergMar 24, 2026
+1
On the other hand, Rian Johnson is adept at writing mysteries to the point that is what he is know for now.
1
FurryYokelMar 24, 2026
+1
>so many loose threads and unanswered questions
The hallmark of a JJ Abrams movie.
1
tgr316Mar 24, 2026
+4
I constantly struggle with the belief that 1) Palpatine returning is a joke that fucked up the story, and 2) Seeing Ian ham it up as Pappa Palpatine one more time waa awesome.
4
inconspicuous_maleMar 24, 2026
+1
I didn't watch The Rise of Skywalker because I heard it sucked and I kinda stopped caring about Star Wars as a whole at that time. This is actually the first time I'm learning that Rey was Palatine's daughter and that's actually blowing my mind a little bit
1
EllairaJaydMar 24, 2026
+1
>The Last Jedi is filled with missed opportunities
That's probably the nicest way I could describe it but I agree, and I agree with the rest of what you said too. I liked RoS overall, but Rey being Palpy's daughter was a terrible idea amongst a bunch of terrible ideas in what was a well-intentioned movie.
1
PossessionSensitive8Mar 24, 2026
+11
Answering as a Gen Z who watched the sequels as they were coming out.
I had seen bits of the animated show, clone wars, when I was 8/9 but never sat down and watched a full episode.. I guess I was more into Teen Titans and Avatar the last airbender.
The force awakens was my first Star Wars movies at 15, then the last Jedi at 17. I remember enjoying both of them, and was surprised by the negative reception of the Last Jedi.
Ended up watching the originals after the Last Jedi. They were enjoyable movies but 17 year old me felt they were a bit dated.
I hated the prequels.
I was 19 when the mandalorian came out so no longer a “kid” but I remember liking the first season.
The rise of skywalker pissed me off.
Never consumed any Star Wars content beyond that.
11
GalaxadtheReaperMar 24, 2026
+13
I was 12 when The Force Awakens came out, so my opinions about Star Wars had been pretty well formed by then.
I was super excited for TFA when it came out, but didn't love it and agreed with most of the criticism I saw about it online. It was too "same-y" to A New Hope. Still, I thought it left a lot of room for the next two movies to be good. Upon rewatching it throughout the years I still mostly feel this way.
The Last Jedi was good and I loved it. There's a lot I would change about it and there were parts I hated. It's very far from perfect, but it was different and new and I respected Rian Johnson for having a vision for the rest of the trilogy and going with it.
Rise of Skywalker was actually terrible. I did not understand what anyone liked about it. It was so clear to me that Abrams was trying to undo everything TLJ did and have a bunch of fan service. I still hate this movie and think it made me way less interested in all things Star Wars that came afterwards.
My biggest criticism is that there was no plan for the trilogy. At all. Each movie is a response to the reaction of the previous movie, especially the Abrams movies.
Lucas actually had a general outline for this trilogy and one after that. I remember seeing the notes on the Star Wars website back when Lucas sold to Disney or when the sequel trilogy was announced. I don't mind Disney changing from Lucas's plan, but they could have at least tried to make a coherent overarching plot.
13
FurryYokelMar 24, 2026
+2
RoS was worse than bad: it was boring.
On the plus side, all nine movies have rifftrax?
2
mayonkonijeti0876Mar 25, 2026
+1
I was 14 when TFA came out and grew up a pretty big Star Wars fan. My opinions on the sequels are pretty similar to yours, but TLJ feels worse to me mainly because it makes no sense inside the greater narrative of the trilogy
1
XiremaMar 24, 2026
+2
Speaking as someone who's *almost* an OG Star Wars fan (grew up with the prequels, but had already seen the original trilogy quite a few times) I'll plant my flag in solidarity with "Rise of Skywalker was actually terrible".
The prequel trilogy is really messy, but I give it a lot of grace solely by virtue of the fact that they *seem to be the movies George Lucas fully intended to make*. We might not agree with his vision, but at least it was a *vision* created by someone with authentic creative aspirations. >!Also Phantom Menace, AKA Episode 1, is fine. It's not great, but it's perfectly functional as a movie and as a story.!<
Meanwhile, the sequel trilogy: I liked both episodes 7 & 8 when they came out, but they both suffer tremendously from the lack of cohesion within this trilogy. Episode 8 at least has proper character arcs for all of its characters, and Episode 7.... is coherent for the entire run.
Episode 9 though... Jesus f****** Christ Episode 9.
The first time I saw it (which was well past when it came out in theaters) stuff would happen, and I would exclaim, out loud to myself, "why is this happening? How does this make sense?" Kylo Ren and Rey kiss at the end of the movie, and I just out loud shouted, "when the f*** was that established?!"
I've eventually reached a point where I can show Episode 9 a certain amount of grace, [knowing how troubled the production was](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DBExyfw8mXk), but it mostly just lets me be more respectful of the people who made it. It's still a pretty terrible movie.
2
urgasmicMar 24, 2026
+11
i don't remember liking it very much. i would say i still don't.
11
Green_CookMar 24, 2026
+14
Actually dying at how few people in this thread can read. Anyway here's my take (as a 20 year old who was 9 when the Force Awakens came out)
The Force Awakens remains an incredibly tight and rewatchable blockbuster if a little boring because it's a beat-for-beat remake of the original. I'm less harsh on the worldbuilding choices as most because it's a fun and well-made movie but it's a very unimaginative start. You can immediately tell that Abrams doesn't entirely get Star Wars because whereas Lucas says "we're doing Vietnam" or "we're doing Bush" in his trilogies, Abrams just goes, "we're doing Star Wars." There's barely even any good new ship designs. Finn, Rey, Kylo and Poe are all cool, though and all very well cast.
The Last Jedi is goated and I've always thought that. I love Brick and pretty much all of Rian Johnson's work so it's no surprise I like it. I would rank it only below A New Hope and Empire. Johnson completely understands where everyone should go from a character standpoint and how to move away from the nostalgiaslop of Abrams while still honoring the soul of the characters and mythos. Killing Snoke and the Holdo maneuver were magic to me as a kid in the theater and they still hold up. I love that it's Luke's movie, and I've always found his death really touching. People don't like that he's a hermit, but that was Abrams' choice not Johnson's, and also he's basically just Yoda again it's not like some betrayal of the franchise lol. Also, gorgeous movie. The deep reds and the bombing sequence and Leia's collar thing -- it's just so cool.
The Rise of Skywalker is our generation's Spider-Man 3. You rewatch it to have a laugh and get a bit embarrassed that you at one point cared about any of this.
Overall, I get the urge to rewatch them occasionally (mainly Last Jedi) but not as much as the original trilogy. I really respect Kathleen Kennedy as a producer for taking such big swings with the directors and believing in them (which worked out great on Jedi, and horribly on Skywalker and Solo) but even as a sequel defender I must admit as a trilogy and end to Star Wars it could have been better.
14
slothunderyourbedMar 24, 2026
+5
I was with you all the way until the Spiderman 3 slander. Can't compare Bully Maguire to the garbage that is Rise of Skywalker.
5
inconspicuous_maleMar 24, 2026
+2
People thought Spiderman 3 was horrible and goth Peter was hated for years. I think it is a good comparison
2
seifdMar 24, 2026
+2
I've heard people say that Lucas' idea for the sequel trilogy also had political inspirations, this time the Iraq war. The new republic would have been dealing with imperial loyalist insurgents.
2
adamdoesmusicMar 24, 2026
+6
A Jedi being a hermit, living out the rest of their life in solitude? *never!*
Except for every Jedi shown on the original films of course (of which there were 2 until Luke, and anakin doesn’t count)
6
FurryYokelMar 24, 2026
+4
Also: a Jedi master sacrificing himself to save his student and then vanishing as a ghost?
That doesn’t belong in Star Wars!
4
Any_Luck_7545Mar 24, 2026
+7
frankly, i think the sequels have some cool moments but they kinda missed the mark on a lot of character stuff. definitely interesting to hear how kids see it differently though.
7
Plastic-Coyote-6017Mar 24, 2026
+19
They're still bad. The ironic reappraisal turning into an unironic reappraisal has been goofy to watch. They're not good movies.
19
crapmonkey86Mar 24, 2026
+10
Yes, seeing this happen with the prequels movies was horrifying. People literally got memed into thinking they were actually good movies. The thing is though, at least with the prequels they feel like a coherent whole, despite being f****** awful movies for the most part. Attack of the clones legitimately might be one of the worst movies ever made, but it's easier to rewatch that movie than any of the sequels. They are well made "productions" but impossible to rewatch, Rise is such a dog shit Star wars product it makes the entire trilogy and era unredeemable. They need to move way into the future away from Rey or wey into the past. They wasted the original trilogy actors for garbage.
10
jproche44Mar 24, 2026
+3
I have to check to see if I write this… I grew up a Star Wars fanboy. Saw Jedi when it was released in theaters. I saw Episode I six times in the theater (just to watch Maul at the end, really). Clones has to be one of the worst movies I have ever seen. Skywalker is one of the most ridiculously written movies. NONE of it makes any sense! One thing Skywalker has that Clones doesn’t is cinematography. Some shots were gorgeous!
3
feartheoldblood90Mar 24, 2026
+9
The thing is, the prequels have a lot of great *ideas,* while the sequels feel like corporate slop with nothing original (save for The Last Jedi, which I think is messy but over-hated)
9
crapmonkey86Mar 24, 2026
+9
I agree the prequels have great pieces that make that era worth having in the Star Wars universe and allowed for some great stuff like The Clone Wars series (both of them). I think the Clone Wars show actually does a huge part in lifting the prequels and I'm glad they were made .
As for the sequels, I think Last Jedi is the best of the bunch. At the time of release, I thought the force awakens was a boring retread due to just repeating the plot of A New Hope, but I gave it a pass because it was trying to get past the stench of the prequel trilogy and I understood the reasoning for making that film the way they did. Last Jedi tried to actually go for something interesting, making Rey And Kylo connected was actually a great touch, as well as killing Snoke to make Kylo the real big bad of the trilogy was a great stroke if Disney hadn't been so scared of the reception to the movie. Assassinating Luke's character aside (they REALLY should have given him a better reason for turning on Kylo) and sidelining Finn, the movie laid a fantastic foundation for the 3rd movie to end at a great point and take Star Wars beyond the Skywalker saga, but they botched it with Rise super hard. I don't even like talking about that movie it's so bad. It reeks of cowardice and cliched filmmaking, it's horrendous.
9
noveler7Mar 24, 2026
+1
Yeah, if you write down the general plots and themes of the prequel trilogy as a whole, it's actually a pretty good story, (not much worse than the original trilogy, imho) but it just had far worse production, dialogue, acting, etc.
1
HearbingerMar 24, 2026
-1
They were great movies
-1
GeriatricGamete67Mar 24, 2026
+2
They're kinda shit but it has absolutely nothing to do with "wokeness" or whatever.
2
darren_meierMar 24, 2026
+6
They're bad. And they'll likely always be bad, in part because they don't benefit much from adjacent content to improve them. Like, the prequels aren't great-- way too much of Lucas deciding he had to pull a Tolkein and explain mathematically what used to be myth, and way too little pushback on his excesses from his colleagues. But the prequels have benefited *enormously* from the adjacent content that's sprung up around them-- *The Clone Wars* is some of the best Star Wars content ever made, and that quality follows into the follow-up projects like *Rebels, Bad Batch*, and the *Tales* series. You even get fun stuff like the Tarkovsky mini-series. The sequels don't have much adjacent content building out and improving the films (save for minor stuff like the Vader comic and such).
TLDR: misguided production management from Disney aside, the sequels don't get the benefit of content that fleshes out their shortcomings, so they have to stand alone. And that hurts them.
6
smileysmiley123Mar 24, 2026
+5
While I agree with what your saying, it also doesn’t touch upon 2 other important factors:
1. The amount of video games that were developed and released before, during, and shortly after the prequel trilogy’s run. An entire medium was effectively snubbed due to such a long rights issue that a single studio did barely anything with for pretty much an entire decade +. We’ve only recently seen an uptick in solid Star Wars video games with more studios having access to the IP.
2. The sequel trilogy was objectively aimless. JJ rehashed ANH, almost 1-to-1, set up some plot threads without a care in the world in figuring out how they would conclude. Johnson at least *attempted* to make an original film while working within the mess JJ left, but the fandom being what it is, gave some sharp backlash that made Disney panic and rehire JJ, who then proceeded to exemplify how terrible of a writer he is. “Somehow, palpatine returned.”
Disney dropped the ball by not having a clear vision and wanting a different director to make each film.
5
trylobyteMar 24, 2026
+3
I laughed when I first read the post. Then I cried when I did the math...Force Awakens was 11 years ago.
3
RoughCoffee6Mar 24, 2026
+1
I know what you mean!
1
CanavansbackyardMar 24, 2026
+9
I wholeheartedly agree that some of the actors were publicly and cruelly excoriated for issues largely outside of their control. For example, Harrison Ford once famously said of George Lucas’ dialogue, “You can type this shit, but you sure can’t say it.” Nevertheless, I still find these prequel films hard to sit through. Everyone’s entitled to their own opinion, however.
9
The-MandalorianMar 24, 2026
+1
I’m 35 years old and grew up with the prequels.
Even today, I can’t do it. I tried my hardest to watch Revenge of the Sith recently and the acting and dialog is so damn atrocious I just couldn’t do it.
Originals and sequels for me any day over the prequels. No question.
1
KurrizmaMar 24, 2026
+5
And Revenge of the Sith is the “good one” with respects to the prequels. I was 9 when it came out, and I’ve watched it probably 200 times throughout my life, so I have so much nostalgia for it, but even that one is hard to watch as an adult. Phantom Menace is bad, and Attack of the Clones might be one of the worst big budget films ever.
5
Hour-Emu-394Mar 24, 2026
+5
It’s so funny seeing the cycle repeat itself people who grew up with the prequel, ignored how weak they were because of nostalgia and now this generation is gonna do the same exact thing.
5
saffeqweMar 24, 2026
+7
I'm not sure that people ignored how weak the prequels were. People always talked about it
7
SupermarketEmpty789Mar 24, 2026
+3
Yeah if anything, people embraced the faults and unintentional humour of the prequels.
Hard to do that with the sequels.
3
Hour-Emu-394Mar 24, 2026
-2
They were all flash and no substance, perfectly made for children and casuals and they never talked about it. Even now they pretend TPM and AotC are good Star Wars films.
-2
saffeqweMar 24, 2026
+1
Who are they? Anakin actor got so bullied he quit acting, people can't stfu about jar jar, aotc was considered the weakest movie before the sequel, padme's death was always meme'd
1
Hour-Emu-394Mar 24, 2026
-2
TPM and AotC are just as dog shit as RoS.
They are the children and casuals when the prequels came out who don’t care that they’re subpar as long as they dance around with lightsabers.
-2
saffeqweMar 24, 2026
+2
you have some problems with your head
2
kvlt_ov_personalityMar 24, 2026
The entire franchise is made for children
0
ConvergentshaveMar 24, 2026
+2
“The entire franchise is made for children”.
Now that’s an internet argument I’ve not heard in a long… long time.
2
8enevolentMar 24, 2026
+1
I was a prequel kid. I loved them and still do, but I hate the sequels. If young kids loved the sequels however, then that's great in my book.
1
liulideMar 24, 2026
+5
But the sequel trilogy only came out like 3 years ago max?
5
banthafodderrMar 24, 2026
+4
The prequels were highly flawed but at least they were creative and expanded the universe. The sequels were just retreading the same stuff and never gave me a desire to watch them again.
4
pwnercam25Mar 24, 2026
+2
At 16 I had just got my first car and could buy movie tickets myself. I saw The Force Awakens 3 times in the theater. The first movie my parents brought me to as a baby was Phantom Menace. I defended TFA to my friends at the lunch table even though deep down I knew they were right that it was just ripping New Hope.
Now I just wish they'd let it die. Make space for new franchises. New pop culture institutions. Tap other IPs that haven't been brought to the big screen before. Or just stop trying to make every f****** thing into a cinematic universe. Star Wars is amazing, it's brought me a lot of joy in my life, even if maybe I've outgrown it. If I ever have a kid I'll show them all 9 movies, but I honestly think the only great one is Empire. I think corporate suits and their shareholders have basically ruined every franchise and IP I grew up with across multiple mediums. And these days I feel more angry at Disney, Amazon, Netflix, etc for their politics rather than for making stupid narrative decisions in decades old story arcs.
11 year old me is still waiting for the edgy, gory Clone Wars movie where you just follow a platoon of grunts around. Tarkovsky got close in 03 but I need the Tarantino blood splatters as a dude gets shredded by a droideka. Until then I guess we have to settle for direct-to-fubee Marvel humor starring Pedro Pascal and the little green fella. So it goes.
2
FriedCammalleri23Mar 24, 2026
+2
I was 16 when TFA came out and 20 when TROS came out, if that at all counts lol.
I loved them then and I love them now. They are very flawed, but so are the other movies.
2
CranksMcgeeMar 24, 2026
+1
They also re-released the original trilogy in theaters around that time. So I actually have nostalgia for that.
1
xotoramesMar 24, 2026
+1
This thread made me feel old
1
karmakramer93Mar 24, 2026
+1
I will never watch them in full again. But they have some cool scenes
1
darth__sidiousMar 24, 2026
+1
The movies were great immediately out of the theater and only jave depreciated over time. Tfa: 7/10, tlj: 5/10, tros: 3/10.
1
limpbizkit420Mar 24, 2026
+1
I’d say the only thing I remember about seeing them in cinema as a teen is the atmosphere of the whole theatre in general. The first appearance of force awakens in cinema, everyone got dressed up and whoever wore a proper costume got a free icecream (so me and my family and a BUNCH of other people, there was even someone in full blown darth vader gear it was awesome). But other then that I don’t have much to say about the movies, and tbh I have more love for the prequels and originals that I grew up with because of my dad who’s crazy about Star Wars. The sequel trilogy just feels really forced.
1
HiddenHoldingMar 24, 2026
+1
My kids were kids while the sequel trilogy came out. Getting to see both the prequels and the sequels through their eyes helped to clarify certain things for me as an original trilogy fan. It helped me enjoy them in ways I probably wouldn’t have if I didn’t have kids. I wasn’t a kid while I watched the sequel trilogy. But I can say: I enjoy elements of all three movies more with increased viewings. My first viewings? Not so great. My kids on the other hand: it was a pleasure to watch them have their own Star Wars mythos. Primarily Rey. She meant a lot to them. She still does. I hope she gets another movie.
As an old-growth original trilogy fan, I have all the nostalgia for my three favorite films thus far…with none of the flaws. Prequel hate, on the other hand, stopped me from becoming an angry nerd early.
Generally speaking, I’m not very bright. I have no sense for what is coming as a trend. But I remember seeing a music video where some hacky angry nerds sang about George Lucas destroying their childhood. Very quickly I realized how ugly it all was. Not only was it not a good look, it stank of bitterness. People who didn’t take creative risks could easily comment on other people who did. And they made that their primary mandate. Which is where, in my humble opinion, the fandom started to fall apart.
Star Wars makes me feel like a kid. It still does. How do I feel about the sequel trilogy now? Episode nine will always be my favorite. Episode eight is the movie I like least in the entire canon. Episode seven felt disorganized, disjointed, and hastily thrown together. Because it was.
I think they did the best they could with the time they had. But I did learn never to wait 10 20 or 30 years for a continuation to an entertainment property. I don’t think it ever works out because too much time has passed, and one’s personal imagination has had too much time to cook.
Either way, I will always go and see new Star Wars stuff day and date. There’s always something to like, and that’s what I focus on these days. I don’t have to like it *all*. But I can always find many things *to* like. In that way, always find something to *enjoy*. And for me, in these later years, that’s what going to the movies is all about.
1
darkholemindMar 24, 2026
+1
I think for kids at the time, it was pure fun!
1
____so____it____goesMar 24, 2026
+1
I think a lot of kids will have find memories of seeing The Force Awakens, but that’s probably as far as it goes
1
Relikk_Mar 24, 2026
+1
The sequels are fundamentally nonsensical on a narrative level and contradict each other. That's bad storytelling that can't be fixed and won't stand the test of time. Aside from not being particularly well made in certain areas, that's something the prequels don't have a problem with.
Stop blaming fans for Ahmed Best's issues, also. He's on record as saying the media were the problem, and unless you know better than his own mother and family the same goes for Jake Lloyd.
1
BillyFatStaxMar 24, 2026
+1
I grew up with the OG trilogy on VHS, was 12yo when Ep1 came out. Thought the prequels were "okay".
Was in my late 20's when the sequels came out.
I really enjoyed The Force Awakens and The Last Jedi. Disliked The Rise of Skywalker.
I realised during the backlash to The Last Jedi that I guess I'm not really a fan of Star Wars. I enjoy them for what they are, think lightsabers are cool, and like most of the characters. But they have never, for me been anywhere near close to "Art".
TLJ was the closest the series ever got, and like crabs in a bucket, the fans couldn't have Star Wars rise above the pulpy silliness of the series.
Honestly, I don't think I could give a shit about SW any more. Disney proved, with their pandering to the mob, that SW is purely a product. Rian Johnson dodged a bullet walking away from doing his spin-off trilogy, tbh.
1
GrayBeardBoardGamerMar 24, 2026
+1
>we’ve seen some redemption for how Gen X and the boomers treated Hayden Christensen and Ahmed Best for things outside their controls
acting talent was beyond hayden christenson's control? what dope your generation smokin'?
1
blackpony04Mar 24, 2026
+1
I was 7 in 1977 and distinctly remember seeing Star Wars with my Dad. I then spent the next 6 years fully immersed in anything Star Wars and consider it the cornerstone of my childhood.
The prequels were clearly not made for me. I absolutely enjoyed them, and in 97 I had married a woman with 2 children whom I would raise as my own. So taking them at 9 & 13 was really awesome and for that reason alone I will always appreciate the prequels.
As for the sequels, I have to first say that *Rogue One* is a masterpiece and if every subsequent Star Wars effort could have matched that one, we wouldn't even be having this discussion.
I loved *The Force Awakens* in spite of its similarity to *Star Wars* (keep that *A New Hope* shit out of here). It felt fresh and naturally having Han Solo and Chewy back was really awesome.
And then they lost the plot. I am still salty over the fact that Disney didn't insist on having all 3 films fully written with one director. I did enjoy the last 2 films, but the cartoon chase in the c***** pissed me off to no end and the whole clone plot just seemed c**** and those films had more holes in them than Swiss cheese. You Force kill Luke Skywalker FFS? You wanna know the last time I felt massive disappointment and rage at a really bad story? The final season of Game of Thrones.
I have enjoyed the Disney series' immensely, however. With the exception of the stupid toddler run in *Obi Wan*, they all have had redeeming qualities and I will see *The Mandalorian and Grogu* in the theater (my first visit to the theater since spring 2024).
1
Sol539Mar 24, 2026
+1
87 baby, saw it with my dad in theaters and I pray I’ll get to have the same memories with my son. It’s a link back to a simpler time for me.
1
NuclearGhandi1Mar 24, 2026
+1
TFA is a fun rehash of the original film that adds some interesting characters (Finn, namely) with a bit much fan service. TLJ is top 3 Star Wars, legitimately a great film that challenges a lot of the stale ideas the franchise had. ROS threw away everything interesting and told a boring fan service clip show, which somehow comes out slightly entertaining
1
cornucopia090139Mar 24, 2026
+1
Like what you like, I have no opinion on it. I liked the sequels, they’re fun to watch and kids love them. The people who try to make it everyone’s business how much they don’t like the sequels and why you shouldn’t either are the worst parts of it.
1
Bosko47Mar 24, 2026
+1
I understand the quality and standard the prequels might've brought to the saga but only in the sequels have we seen such awesome combat choregraphy, battles, intrigue and overall iconic visuals (and memes !)
1
Sufficient_Ad4898Mar 24, 2026
+1
I was 7 years old when Star Wars came out saw it 3 times in the theatre. I think the first 3 films were aimed at kids and still feel that way.
1
Happy_Chimp_123Mar 24, 2026
+1
The prequels had good ideas, poorly executed.
The sequels had bad ideas, well executed.
1
Toothygrin1231Mar 24, 2026
+1
The original trilogy is still awesome. I watch them from time to time — and own the original pre-1997 Lucasifying vids.
1
WEEGEMANMar 24, 2026
+1
Too soon
1
legendofthecuntMar 24, 2026
Me and all my friends were really excited for TFA and even marthoned the entire franchise for the first time (yes) in anticipation just based off of the reputation it had. The malls had merch all over and most of the youtubers we watched were talking about it. It had close to endgame levels of hype. I remember most of us actually ended up preferring the prequels to the og films because it felt like there was so much more going on.
The hype quickly died off after the TFA when the fan boys started acting crazy and being toxic tho. Suddenly all the fun discussions, pointing out of Easter eggs and memes turned into vile old men shitting on women and minorities and talking about The Good Old Days™. It really turned us off from continuing with the sequel trilogy and we never ended up watching the next two movies.
0
Agent101gMar 24, 2026
+1
I have such massive star wars fatigue that i can't handle anything but the original originals, the trilogy that was before my time. The sequels with pod racing and so forth have fallen off my radar long ago.
1
CatholicCrusaderJediMar 24, 2026
+1
I had just turned 18 when TFA came out, with my 4 younger siblings ranging in age from 5 to 15. We all really liked TFA when it was released, but absolutely hated TLJ and TROS as the years went by. At the time, I loved Star Wars a bit more than my siblings and they hated TLJ upon first viewing, while I didn't hate it (I was in pure denial a Star Wars movie could be bad) until a second viewing.
They have mostly moved beyond Star Wars now, while maintaining nostalgia and good memories of the original trilogy, the prequels, and The Clone Wars TV show which we watched as kids before the sequel trilogy. They absolutely hate the sequels, including TFA, now and while they maintain an interest in Star Wars lore, are mostly uninterested in anything Disney is putting out these days. I'm the only one left really keeping a tab on Star Wars and they come to me to see if anything new might pique their interest, as they have no desire to research new projects themselves.
1
Derpy_KirbyMar 24, 2026
+1
I was finishing high school when the trilogy ended (and started uni in Sept 2020, rip lol) and can say they are not aging well in my mind at all… I know I’m probably older than the response you were hoping, but is at least a perspective
I especially think so because the Dune movies (if the third one does hit) will show how not meddling with the director, and having a clear and consistent vision actually nets a great series. I would argue that the sequel trilogy would fare, at least moderately well, if Abrams or Johnson had control over all 3 movies
I know one is an adaptation while the other is an original story, but I’d argue that adapting what was deemed an unadaptable story is equally as monumental as writing a pulpy sci-fi series with what was the most rabid fanbase, albeit with unlimited money and a multitude of IP to rely on
1
aquila-audaxMar 24, 2026
+1
I saw all the originals in the cinema on their original release. I kind of wish I'd just kept the memory of enjoying them and never rewatched them, because they maybe aren't all that great. Still better than the prequels, but not as great as some would have you believe.
1
Mr_Emile_heskeyMar 24, 2026
+1
The first of the sequel trilogy I only saw because my town was flooded in the 2015 boxing day floods and there wasn't a right lot to do. It didn't change my opinion on star wars as a whole, the universe as a whole is more interesting than the main line stories. I'd argue Rogue One is one of the best films because of this opinion.
1
Smooth_Moose_637Mar 24, 2026
+1
Thaught it was meh then, think it's meh now
1
Any_Luck_7545Mar 24, 2026
frankly, i think the sequels have some cool moments but they kinda missed the mark on a lot of character stuff. definitely interesting to hear how kids see it differently though.
0
Jedi_GillMar 24, 2026
The thing to remember is that the star wars movies came out when computer technology was nowhere near it is now. So to see what we saw on the screen looked absolutely magical and literally out of this world.
It's equivalent to that old video of people freaking out when a motion train is on the screen and coming towards them and they feel it's going to Jill them.
I recall my dad telling me, he couldn't fathom what a TV was. He was told that people are on it moving and talking in black and white and while it no doubt looked kinda shitty on a 13 Inch screen he was mesmerized the first time he saw it. Star wars was no different hitting those mental wow does this even exist moments.
3D Avatar did this to our younger generation, making it feel so real, that I recall stories of people that wanted to live in the world.
0
calmdahnMar 24, 2026
-7
Are you f****** kidding me? Hayden Christensen one of the worst acting jobs of all time. No redemption. Terrible casting, terrible direction, terrible acting, terrible movies. The prequels are trash covered in shit. No redeemable qualities.
-7
antiMATTer724Mar 24, 2026
+10
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit, is it?
10
MusicFilmandGameguyMar 24, 2026
+2
From my point of view, the Jedi are evil!!!”
2
calmdahnMar 24, 2026
+1
lololololol
1
CansuelaMar 24, 2026
+3
You have to do such crazy gymnastics to paint those movies in a positive light it’s wild. People crucify plot and choices made in the sequel trilogy while blindly accepting just as laughable plot points in the prequels. And, the prequels already had a clear outline of where the story needed to go and a solid blueprint to follow.
The sequels are far from perfect and I think the overall plot and choices made regarding the story are the biggest issues with them, but they’re at least competently made, written (dialogue wise), and acted films. There’s a lot for me to like about the sequel trilogy at least where as the prequels gave us 2 notable set pieces and nothing else. I genuinely find the prequels bordering on unwatchable. They also have the unfortunate fact that they were made during the explosion of CGI and like many movies from the time that rely so heavily on it, they look and feel really dated in a way that not even the OG feel.
3
calmdahnMar 24, 2026
Yep. Exactly.
0
ThreeHourRiverManMar 24, 2026
Honestly, Star Wars isn’t that important to me. Which is a shame, I really enjoyed the original trilogy when they were re-released in theaters as a kid.
I just don’t really care much about the franchise between the prequels, sequels, and over saturation. I’m burnt out on it all.
0
Handsome_fart_faceMar 24, 2026
I loved them as a kid but now I cant really watch them without skipping all the scenes with padme and anakin. They feel really cringe…
0
DamthemalltohelpMar 24, 2026
I watched them properly in 1997 on the big screen.
The original trilogy is a big screen experience. That's where it's power is.
I think I know too much about filmmaking and specifically about Star Wars behind the scenes that some of the magic wears out.
They're still I credible lower pictures... Especially New Hope and Empire. See them on the big screen at every age!
0
LAMistfit138Mar 24, 2026
Sucked then and it sucks now
0
Dipper_PinesMar 24, 2026
I went to the midnight preview of Phantom Menace back in 1999 and framed my movie ticket. Never even bothered to show up for Attack of The Clones. Watched and immediately forgot about Revenge of the Sith. The prequels really erased all interest i had in the franchise. These days I have nothing to do with it. Haven‘t watched a single TV show of theirs.
0
Seagoon_MemoirsMar 24, 2026
I was 15 when Star Wars first came out. ( 1976 )
It was definitely a movie meant for teens, marketed to teens, we knew Luke and Leia were teens and we identified.
Luke's aunt and uncle the age of our parents. Han Solo was a grown up, Obi Wan was ancient
We grew up watching repeats of Star Trek so some of us were already nerdy.
The movie poster was straight up just like the cover of 60s and 70s sci fi paperbacks by Frank Frazetta and we recognised it as such
0
AndJusticeForAll-88Mar 24, 2026
In my childhood these were my favorite movies, I could rewatch them an enormous number of times.
0
CSmith489Mar 24, 2026
I was born in ‘98 so I saw 2 & 3 in theaters and grew up with all of them on VHS/DVD. The prequel trilogy is my favorite of all of the movies.
0
calmdahnMar 24, 2026
Furthermore, the same thing can be said about the original trilogy. Nostalgia makes people think they’re better movies than they were.
0
ice1waterMar 24, 2026
-4
I rewatched them recently thinking they would suck and I think they are actually awesome. The set design and the vehicles and droids are so cool, even just the furniture in the rooms, it’s all packed with style and effort. Everything looks like a pair of y2k Oakley glasses. Darth Maul is an all time freaky villain and I love that he just dies off instead of being dragged out for multiple films. Anakin being driven to evil by the pain of his youth and his relationship to his mother was pretty compelling, and his killing of the young Jedis is a pretty insane and striking cinematic moment. I think the movies are much better than they get credit for.
-4
Vip3r20Mar 24, 2026
+5
Thems be the prequels not the sequels.
5
ice1waterMar 24, 2026
+1
Ohh I misunderstood the question
1
yuropod88Mar 24, 2026
+1
I like your take. This thread is nothing but a bunch of people continuing to complain. I feel drained just reading the same old tired gripes. Also OP asked about sequels, but everyone is just talking about everything? What is going on in here?
1
ice1waterMar 24, 2026
+1
Thanks bro. Yeah I don’t know, lot of negative energy in this thread, I was just answering the prompt 😂
1
Lazy-Background-7598Mar 24, 2026
-8
Huh. Jar jar was stupid. No one blamed Best
-8
mantisinmypantisMar 24, 2026
+12
Are you f****** kidding me? People treated that man *terribly* and it’s only been recent years that he’s gotten better treatment from the SW community.
12
Lazy-Background-7598Mar 24, 2026
+2
He simply took the criticism personally. That was a mistake
2
CommentariotMar 24, 2026
-2
There is no "star wars community"
-2
CanavansbackyardMar 24, 2026
+6
>No one blamed Best
Sorry, but this is simply not true. In the aftermath of *Phantom Menace* Best was the recipient of a veritable avalanche of media/social criticism that included doxxing and death threats. At one point Best even considered suicide.
6
Lazy-Background-7598Mar 24, 2026
+1
lol. Ok
Not quite accurate. Best took the criticism of the role personally.
The character still is idiotic
1
CanavansbackyardMar 24, 2026
>Not quite accurate.
Insofar as I know everything I said was accurate. Indeed, the circumstances surrounding the public’s initial hostile reaction to Jar Jar, which often extended to actor who portrayed the character, are well documented and well known within the Star Wars community. And I find your seeming lack of empathy for Ahmed Best disturbing.
0
cheeriodustMar 24, 2026
If only they had the balls to stick with the Darth Darth Binks plotline...
0
rbrgr83Mar 24, 2026
Somehow.........Mee-saa return.
0
ConvergentshaveMar 24, 2026
-1
As much as I… dislike the prequels. (I was 14 when they came out and it was… well it was a rough summer: although I saw the phantom menace probably 3 times in theaters).
I can at least… appreciate them for what they are. No I won’t rewatch them. (My wife, who ironically enough is older than me enjoys a good rewatch at least once or twice a year), I can get what the thought process was.
The sequels… I would be shocked if they resonant with kids the way the prequels did. Because at the end of the day the prequels, for all their many, MANY faults, tell a coherent story. Part 1, part 2, part 3.
The sequels do not. They tell: part 1 (again), part… hey check it out! And part: ok ok whew our bad look uh… part 6ish?
They literally don’t even follow the hero’s journey. They just kind of… scramble all over and look: people, even small kids aren’t stupid. There’s a reason basic storylines/the heroes journey appeals to us.
The sequels are to disjointed to really connect. Yea yea, this being Reddit you’ll get the “I loved the sequels and rewatch “rise of Skywalker every day” comment/crowd. But for the rest of us: they don’t offer any sort of emotional connection to any particular character.
-1
deathclonicMar 24, 2026
-1
Revenge of the sith is still amazing 10/10.
-1
CansuelaMar 24, 2026
-3
I’m a millenial and I still think the prequels are terrible, nearly unwatchable aside from some set pieces. The dialog and characterization is atrocious, the plot is brutal….there’s just really nothing to like. Even the climactic Obi wan and Anakin duel is just melodramatic and bordering on parody.
I was obsessed with Star Wars and was 15 when TPM came out and was instantly extremely disappointed aside from the Darth Maul showdown.
The only people I know who like the prequels were those who were closer to 7-9 when they came out, which makes sense because the movies were obviously made for young children. They were just so clearly commercial enterprises designed to sell toys that it was just way too much of a turn off.
I like the sequels much better, even if there are plenty of choices and story beats that I don’t love. Overall, they’re just much more competently made and acted. They feel much closer in tone to the original and get a lot more of the action and drama with splashes of humor and sarcasm sprinkled in feel of the originals. The only way I can see liking the prequels is through pure childhood nostalgia and a sense of ownership of “these are OUR Star Wars movies”.
The truth is that since 83, the best forms of SW media have been in formats other than Motion Pictures. Novels, comics, games, shows have all in my opinion done more for Star Wars fans than the main line films.
I do think Rogue One was pretty damn well made and compelling and I’m glad it exists.
-3
givemeajinglefingalMar 24, 2026
They're not going to care. Star Wars as a major cultural phenomenon is dead. Sure the movies will still make a ton of money and there will always be fans but the monoculture is dead and kids under 18 now just don't give a shit to the degree they used to. They have YouTube and TikTok and video games and the MCU and a thousand other things to occupy their time and headspace. Star Wars just isn't special anymore.
0
rickyroca73Mar 24, 2026
I have memories of being at the theater for Star Wars in 1977, I was 3, nearly 4yrs old. I remember being scared of the Tusken Raiders and shocked and confused as to what happened to Obi Wan. Also, Uncle Owen and Aunt Beru was pretty shocking for someone my age. I remember being so excited when Han came back and helped the rebels and Luke complete the mission. Awesome stuff.
For ESB, I was obviously a few years older, almost 7 so my memory of that experience are much more vivid. Luke training on Dagoba was awesome, also I was too young to catch what was really Luke and Leia’s relationship so when Han kept pursuing Leia, I didn’t like that, haha. My most vivid memory of ESB, other than Luke learning the truth about his father, duh!, was the ending, I didn’t know a movie could just end without the good guys prevailing and when the music played and credits rolled I was not happy! They had Han, Luke had a new hand and he was becoming a Jedi, why aren’t they going to save Han!
When RoTJ came out I was almost 10 and was totally ready for it. Sure it was some cheesy stuff with the Ewoks, so people shit on the movie, but for someone my age, the whole thing just worked. All of it. I was sad at the end with Luke and Anakin, but glad the Emperor didn’t prevail…or did he? Anyhow, those 3 movies still hold up around my house. All of my kids have watched them a couple of times through and they’re still a stop down for me to this day and always will be. The prequels are ok in my book, especially RoTS, so I don’t mind them. The last 3 are ok, they definitely could’ve and should’ve been better though. I’m glad we’ve gotten more Star Wars especially Rogue One, glad I’m old enough to appreciate that one, not sure what 4 yr old me could’ve done with that one. May the Force be with you!
Edit: i can’t read. But you got a sentence on it. lol
0
WerewolfCurious1412Mar 24, 2026
I’m f****** old and am jealous of my son, he’s got a decade of quality marvel films before they are not so great.
I’ve been dwelling on the same three f****** movies for almost 50 years.
The prequels sucked, the sequels really sucked and the shows are meh.
0
TimesThreeTheHighestMar 24, 2026
I still enjoy them, and I still think that the effect of those movies on Hollywood is/was profound.
My mom carried me into a theater to see the first Star Wars, back when I was too small to walk in on my own power. I remember nothing of seeing the movie at the time, only the waiting in line.
0
sjw_7Mar 24, 2026
I was four and just starting school when Star Wars was came out so was a little young at the time. But by the time The Empire Strikes Back came out my friends and I were older and well into it. We owned loads of the figures and always took them to school with us.
The only time we could watch it back then was when it was on TV because we didn't own a video player. For a few years they showed Star Wars on Christmas day in the afternoon. Looking forward to watching it was almost as exciting as getting presents and is still a core memory for me more than 40 years later.
There was difficult to get information on it as there was no internet back then. You either had to go to the cinema if it was being shown as a rerun, rent a copy on video or wait for it to be shown on TV. Other than that it was word of mouth and I remember rumours going round school when the second one came out that Vader was Luke's father. It actually caused arguments because some of the kids wouldn't believe it.
I think it may be hard for someone who wasn't young at the time to understand how big a deal it was for many kids. There was nothing else like it and it captured our imaginations. The only other thing that I have seen do the same is Harry Potter.
0
TheIrishStoryMar 24, 2026
Total indifference. For me Star Wars were glossy 80s kids movies. I liked them as a kid (rented them on video, it was that long ago) but they really don't stand up to scrutiny on a rewatch.
I cannot for the life of me understand an adult rewatching them. Now, each to their own, I know lots of people love them for nostalgia etc.
I went to see Phantom Menace as an 18 year old (it was rubbish) and that was it for me with Star Wars. It's a mystery to me how the franchise is still going.
0
EbolatasticMar 24, 2026
It's been too soon, bro. You're just going to get whiny prequel fans and jaded OT fans. Gotta wait another 10 years or so for those kids to grow up and be like "the sequels RULE". Trust me, it already happened with the prequels. That all aside, it is HILARIOUS levels of irony seeing prequel fans talk about how the sequels ruined Star Wars. Seriously, so funny, lol.
0
RoughCoffee6Mar 24, 2026
+1
Yeah, I’m getting that vibe too. So many people didn’t read my post and are talking about the prequel’s or that they were kids when the original or prequel trilogies came out and it’s like “why are you talking?”
1
GimpalongMar 25, 2026
The prequels are terrible, but at least they are internally coherent. The sequel trilogy was a rushed cash grab.
0
zip222Mar 25, 2026
I was about 10 when Jedi came out, so I have the most childhood love for it, which is most likely rooted in the toys. New Hope is the one I now struggle the most to enjoy. Empire is miles better than the other two, though I definitely didn't feel that way until I was an adult.
0
cmcglinchyMar 25, 2026
I was 11 when Star Wars came out in ‘77, and I’ve enjoyed all of the subsequent movies to varying degrees.
0
RoughCoffee6Mar 25, 2026
+1
So you weren’t a kid when the sequel trilogy came out?
188 Comments