It's weird how little news I've seen about No Kings today. We went to one in NC and the turnout was insane
886
WasteBinStuffMar 28, 2026
+688
It's not weird if you consider the ownership structure of just about all of the major media outlets in the country.
688
BujuBadMar 28, 2026
+155
It's basically all state media at this point
155
Highcalibur10Mar 29, 2026
+27
When you live in an oligarchy, privately owned media *is* state media.
27
BolaSquirrelMar 28, 2026
+115
Let's call it suspicious. I think we all know what's up
115
GrowlithezMar 28, 2026
+109
Headlines in Norway as the "No Kings" is one of the biggest protests in America. If its not making headlines in the US thats very sus
109
French87Mar 29, 2026
+21
I’m actively trying to find more articles or information about them. I can’t find much. And I’m in California…
21
WasteBinStuffMar 28, 2026
+71
We do. But just so it's clear, let's spell it out...
Minneapolis news station ownership:
- KARE 11 :Tegna Inc., a large publicly traded media company merging with Nexstar
- KMSP 9 : FOX
- WFTC 9.2 : FOX
- WCCO 4 : Paramount Global
- WUCW 23 : Sinclair
KSTP 5 and KSTC 5.2 are owned by the local Hubbard Broadcasting Group, which generally has a good journalistic reputation but is privately owned by a Conservative Republican Trump supporter.
71
mediumrainbowMar 29, 2026
+5
I will credit KMSP. I find it to be the least partisan local news coverage. Local affiliates don't automatically filter Fox news propaganda.
5
AshikuraMar 28, 2026
-12
To your last point, we should all remember that just because the owner is someone we disagree with that doesn’t mean the organization is inherently corrupted. It’s the same mindset that’s led to the MAGA cultishness
-12
RiPPeR69420Mar 29, 2026
+17
Nah. Between the Epstein files and the Panama papers, and the generalized systemic capture by corporate America at this point the onus of proof for ANY person in a position of public influence to prove they aren't a piece of shit is on them. Especially if they GOP affiliated in any way. Hopefully the US can cut the tumor that is Trump and Co in November, so that your system can aggressively investigate and prosecute their enablers to the fullest extent of the law, in both a civil a criminal sense. No benefit of the doubt, no exceptions.
17
SamTheLab_213Mar 29, 2026
+9
It will take more than cutting out that big, wrinkly, ugly tumor. He's just a sign of a long-metastasized cancer that's been oozing underneath the surface. All those names redacted in the Epstein files are control of our lives in some way. That's the tip of the iceberg. You need not walk far to find those creeps. We need all those files released and to be free of these miserable people.
9
RiPPeR69420Mar 29, 2026
+1
Unfortunately, short of a general strike and a mutiny by the military there is a zero percent chance that happens before the midterms.
1
garimusMar 29, 2026
+2
Agreed. The time for concessions and half measures are long over with.
It was pretty clear in 2016 when the tumor first showed itself. Now? There is zero question. Verbal tact has left the building after Democratic representatives have exhaustively, repeatedly tried to reign in their unhinged counterparts across the aisle.
The only thing left now is decisive action or else we all fail our oaths to the origins of this nation.
2
mrm00r3Mar 29, 2026
+1
Nah f*** that. Capitalism is corruption and electoralism is the application of capitalism to the concept of agency and self determination.
1
wrosecransMar 29, 2026
+7
It's definitely informative to compare it to the "Tea party" protests under Obama. Those were a couple of dorks, covered as a political shockwave. At their absolute peak, they were a tiny fraction of the size of No Kings protests. No Kings is basically the largest single political protest events ever, and they get buried in US news coverage. There's no way to defend a belief that coverage of this stuff is neutral. Covering it accurately would destroy the Both Sides horserace model.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-HoSJPWXTp0
7
strangedazeyMar 28, 2026
+3
This 💯. I think protests need to be daily
3
knockoncloudsMar 28, 2026
+19
Same with San Antonio, TX. They had an entire corridor of downtown shut to traffic for hours there were so many people protesting. Not a peep on the news.
19
Party-Tone2826Mar 28, 2026
+78
[https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cq8wy7g1gd1o](https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cq8wy7g1gd1o)
No Kings protests across the US rally against Donald Trump
[https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2026/mar/28/no-kings-protests-us-trump-administration-latest-updates](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2026/mar/28/no-kings-protests-us-trump-administration-latest-updates)
78
No_Struggle1364Mar 28, 2026
+120
U.S. news sources are corrupt.
120
DialecticEnjoyerMar 28, 2026
+18
US news sources dont want to lose their broadcast license.
18
SamTheLab_213Mar 29, 2026
+12
"Everyone has a price." That includes the 4th estate.
12
FirefighterLeft5425Mar 28, 2026
+73
Just left Grant Park in Chicago. It was f****** massive. Made it to the front row and it stretched all the way out to the Art Institute.
73
-Ny-Mar 28, 2026
+67
The Revolution won't be televised
(In other words, the billionaire owned media is only going to show/focus on what they want people to see)
67
hawkseye17Mar 28, 2026
+33
Not weird at all. Just look at who owns the major media and it makes sense. They're all Republicans
33
pivovyMar 29, 2026
+1
I don't know where you're getting your news from, guys... I've been seeing it covered all day today, my feeds, tv, everywhere. I'm not American though.
1
dog_of_societyMar 28, 2026
+16
Went to one in Oregon. I couldn't get a gauge on the amount of people but it was ~~easily in the thousands~~ easily 10% of the town (edited for clarity. not in a big city.)
16
hkohneMar 28, 2026
+8
I just finished at the main Portland one. The turnout was insane. And there was a Thorns soccer game going on at the same time. Perfect weather definitely helped.
8
WragtMar 28, 2026
+9
The most corrupt U.S. admin has been systematically targeting journalism organizations
9
pivovyMar 29, 2026
+9
What are you talking about? MSNOW has been talking about it all day and CNN reported on it a bunch of times.
9
Oleg101Mar 29, 2026
+8
Yeah I was looking for a sensible comment like this. I noticed this too but everyone just bas tk get their usual anti-media comments, and this doesn’t fit their framework.
8
UndisclosedLocation5Mar 28, 2026
+10
There were thousands in Denver
10
conn_r2112Mar 28, 2026
+4
Yeah the right owns all the media… not shocking
4
Formal_Active859Mar 28, 2026
+3
yeah i was expecting a lot more coverage too
3
YakassaMar 28, 2026
+2
The Orbanization of the Media folks.
2
DisciplineBoth2567Mar 29, 2026
+1
Yeah, there’s … a reason. Read Age of Surveillance Capitalism by Shoshona Zuboff
1
medicalmosquitoMar 29, 2026
+1
It’s been the top story on my Google news feed all day, every major network is reporting on it more than they ever have before
1
omerkraftMar 29, 2026
+1
Gatherings+ meetings+rallies= strongly worded letters
All those are politically correct street shows. Useless...
We need general strike! Stop spending, stop paying taxes, blocking highways, stopping non-emergency of.... everything!
1
IrishVictim88270Mar 29, 2026
+1
Hundreds of minor, single issue protests happen everyday. If the media covered them all no real news would get covered.
1
l_____IMar 28, 2026
-15
Cause no one cares about a stupid gathering. It’s not a real protest it’s just democrats jerking each other off pretending to do something while the elite continue to f*** us over. No one is losing money over this
-15
evocativenameMar 29, 2026
Protests are what you make of them.
If they weren't scared of these protests, when would corporate media ever downplay something this many people were doing?
They paid more attention to Tea Party protests involving 1/10th as many people.
0
ilevelconcreteMar 28, 2026
-1
Unfortunately, you are correct. Who cares? Can anyone even articulate what this was supposed to accomplish?
-1
PwAlreadyTakenMar 28, 2026
+6
The biggest practical effect is probably just networking and giving groups a chance to increase their numbers while people are fired up. But, even just as a singular event, protests give historical, domestic, and international insight into who is disagreeing, about what, and how many. If dissent only lived on the insular and bot-ridden internet, it would be easy to disregard it. And, while more intangible, exercising the right to protest regularly helps to safeguard it.
6
jenij730Mar 28, 2026
+360
I was at the St Paul event today. I would estimate well over 100k were there. Wall to wall people from the capitol to the cathedral. This picture was not taken at the height of the crowds.
360
NectarineCheap1541Mar 28, 2026
+52
It's a feed from KSTP. You can see the full size if you let the video play
52
OverfitAndChill8647Mar 29, 2026
+17
KSTP = Hubbard Broadcasting, owned by Stanley Hubbard... richest MAGA in MN.
17
RIPMYPOOPCHUTEMar 29, 2026
+15
I was at the SLP one today and there were so many people! It was awesome.
15
AmItheonlySanepersonMar 29, 2026
And you changed 0 minds
0
CrazyBowelsAndBrapsMar 28, 2026
+137
Fox News calling it a "communist revolution" lmao
137
fighterpilottimMar 29, 2026
+48
Foxes top headline is as follows:
“$3B network behind ‘No Kings’ protests tied to communist 'revolution' push, investigation finds”
48
Dan_BergMar 28, 2026
+28
The organizers in my town made sure to tell us all to go shopping and spend money at the small businesses around after the event haha
28
Outrageous_Act_3016Mar 29, 2026
+8
What happens if a draft goes through and 500,000 Americans come home from a war even less popular than Vietnam?
8
UnitSmall2200Mar 29, 2026
+1
the next democrat in power needs to shut down fox news.
1
medicalmosquitoMar 29, 2026
+2
So because we don’t wan a king, we’re communists? 🤔
2
WasteBinStuffMar 28, 2026
+130
It really seems like the headline should be reading "millions", because thousands isn't going to be enough.
130
GoodIdea321Mar 28, 2026
+91
It was common to have headlines for the earlier No King's protests to say thousands even though millions showed up each time. This headline is about one city, which had at least 50,000 people show up. There were/are something like 3000 hosted events today.
91
joeychestnutsrectumMar 28, 2026
+63
For those wondering - 50k people is well over 10% of the population of Minneapolis, and like 6-7% of its side of the metro. Also outlying towns had their own rallys locally.
63
agent_unoMar 29, 2026
+7
I was at the first No kings in St. Paul last June, and the final numbers were at least 80k, filling the upper lawn with a little on the lower lawn (which is nearly twice the size as the upper lawn). I’ve been to other rallies there that make be believe the 80k number was accurate.
Today both upper and lower lawns were FULL, with more in the two streets adjacent to the capitol building.
If today was under 200k I would be surprised. It was packed!
7
zoinkabilityMar 29, 2026
+2
Yeah, I'd say it was at least 150k today. Also there was a lot of coming and going. Lots of people were arriving halfway through, and others were leaving halfway through. So the total number of attendees is a good bit higher than the max at any given time.
2
WasteBinStuffMar 28, 2026
+17
Yes. I'm aware. My point was two-fold. In general, I wish there were even more people. But it is also important to emphasize the real amount of people. Given the comparatively sparse media coverage in the first place, every opportunity to emphasize the size of protests should be taken.
So a headline could say....
"Tens of thousands gathered in Minneapolis today. Over 10% of the city's population. Joining millions across the country, at 3000 protest events!"
17
GoodIdea321Mar 28, 2026
+12
Agreed, but it does seem like local news want to downplay the number of people. It's frustrating.
12
WasteBinStuffMar 28, 2026
+13
Because, reasons....
- KARE 11 :Tegna Inc., a large publicly traded media company merging with Nexstar
- KMSP 9 : FOX
- WFTC 9.2 : FOX
- WCCO 4 : Paramount Global
- WUCW 23 : Sinclair
KSTP 5 and KSTC 5.2 are owned by the local Hubbard Broadcasting Group, which generally has a good journalistic reputation but is privately owned by a Conservative Republican Trump supporter.
13
HobbesNJMar 28, 2026
+6
Corporate media is owned by people who benefit under Republicans, and particularly so under Trump. They are incentivized to downplay the opposition.
6
SamTheLab_213Mar 29, 2026
+2
Advertisers pull ads when there's content they don't like. The corruption is multi-faceted.
2
pimparo0Mar 29, 2026
+3
They are probably part of a parent company owned by the billionaires.
3
HobbesNJMar 28, 2026
+1
This was just in Minnesota. Demonstrations were held in thousands of places across the country today. Millions participated.
1
Killahdanks1Mar 28, 2026
-1
This was one protest in one place today in Minnesota. There were tons of protests all around the state. There were people everywhere and it was noticeable to many that weren’t participating.
Now do that in 50 states. If you didn’t go out yourself, get involved or shut it with the negative opinions
-1
WasteBinStuffMar 29, 2026
+1
Encouraging more participation and clearer reporting is hardly negative pal.
Maybe if you took the effort to follow through the thread you would see that I addressed your point already.
1
Ananumous65Mar 28, 2026
+43
Two of my siblings are there. There are *200,000* protesters at No Kings Flagship Protest at the MN State Capitol!
43
mhitchnerMar 28, 2026
+32
I understand why there's so little coverage and the articles that are out seem to diminish the turnout. Its still infuriating.
32
gotkubeMar 29, 2026
+2
That’s what happens when your media is owned by the oligarchy. But hey, keep telling yourselves you’re “free.” 🙄
2
gabacus_39Mar 28, 2026
+160
And unsurprisingly pathetic little news coverage in your fucked up country
160
Grand_Size_4932Mar 28, 2026
+53
Unsurprisingly, yes. So what would you do about that if you were in our shoes?
53
SydasiatenMar 28, 2026
+44
Actually disruptive protest on a weekday. No kings is just a block party for frustrated people who will go back to their normal lives on Monday while Trump laughs and plans his invasion of Cuba
44
Grand_Size_4932Mar 28, 2026
+43
Genuinely asking. If the media isn’t even covering it, how do you think a country as large as ours can organize any faster?
I’ve been hearing the same thing for over a year.
“The no kings protests aren’t effective.”
“The no kings protests seem so disorganized.”
“The no kings protests aren’t even attended.”
Yet every single time, the protests have gotten larger and larger, breaking every record.
What do you think precedes disruptive protest????
43
medicalmosquitoMar 29, 2026
+3
They don’t know what they’re talking about. Persistent, peaceful protests have turned the tide of many social movements. They work.
3
ValiumBluesMar 29, 2026
+12
Don’t work. Bring most of the country to a halt.
I appreciate your protests, but even you have to admit that they’re ineffective - regardless of the crowd sizes.
I’m not saying you should stop; making your disdain heard is more important than ever.
I’m just saying that you shouldn’t expect any results from this.
12
consequentlydreamyMar 29, 2026
+18
Idk if results are the goal for these so much as individual speeches targeting specific counties on what action makes sense for their area. For some that’s going to be canvassing a more progressive candidate for some that’s going to be restricting purchases and finding local alternatives etc I don’t think the answer is “everyone quit work and protest” because realistically people have jobs and are scared the f*** of losing housing and food. You kinda have to meet people where they are and ease people into protesting. Some of that is with their money and what they spend. Some of that is with local politicians or city boards etc. I think just encouraging people to get involved and relieving those barriers is a step in the right direction.
18
ValiumBluesMar 29, 2026
+3
I agree, hence me making this comment further down:
Your answer also highlights that Americans let all of this go on for way too long. You became complacent.
All the issues you list, vs protesting in France, are valid.
They also highlight that your country has been too lazy and complacent for decades to get to where you’re at now.
Trump isn’t the issue. He’s a symptom of so many things that are wrong with the US that can’t be fixed for generations to come.
This isn’t the first time he made it into the WH; and it’s not like you guys didn’t have countless “warnings” with regards to republican presidents previously.
Bottom line: maybe large scale protests should have happened decades ago, when meaningful change was possible. Americans wouldn’t be as fearful / timid of their employers if you hadn’t privatised healthcare to begin with, and tied it to jobs.
A good (under-educated) chunk of you have been screaming “socialism” every time a half-sane politician wanted to introduce an act that could actually help you.
3
consequentlydreamyMar 29, 2026
+2
Some people are literally living in totally different worlds with their news/allgorithims/ news feeds. I googled “what Trump has done since his presidency” on some random computers the last months (from my brothers to various office ones to libraries) and literally the first page was ONLY good things for MOST of those. I disagree about people not taking warnings seriously. Some take it seriously but are being fed completely different stories. Control the narrative and you control many thoughts.
I believe meaningful change is still possible. Check mamdani for example
People still would have and still are fearful of losing their jobs for the reasons someone mentioned earlier: “There are many more reasons than not being motivated enough, though that is a major one.
Our health system being tied to our jobs, which act punitively towards us for missing any amount of work is another. Our lowered education standards being another. Our propagandized individualism another. Many reasons. I can go on. I’ve thought about these long and hard.”
“Undereducated chunk of you” don’t include me when I am having a calm discussion with you.
2
IllegalDMar 29, 2026
+1
You entirely missed the point of the comment you were replying to
1
CPUsCantDoNothingMar 29, 2026
They don't get it lol. It's not feasible at this size.
0
SydasiatenMar 28, 2026
-18
It’s been 1,5 years and America has mustered 4 no kings protests during that time. By the time these protests actually accomplish anything trump will be laughing in his third term
-18
Grand_Size_4932Mar 28, 2026
+25
There it is again.
The non-solution response that attempts to say the same thing everyone else has already said.
If you can’t be bothered to answer any of my questions, then you have no answers. And if you have no answers, respectfully, go f*** yourself.
You’re criticizing without offering anything new. If you were in our shoes, you’d also be struggling to find ways to organize.
I guarantee anything you could think of, we’ve already tried and failed with. I promise. This problem is bigger than your frustration alone can solve.
25
Dark-Acheron-SunsetMar 28, 2026
Yes, that's why the people of France can do it at the drop of a hat while we sit here with our thumbs up our asses acting as if it's a complex problem we can't do anything about, right?
Our countrymen aren't motivated enough, and that is a fact.
0
Grand_Size_4932Mar 28, 2026
+6
There are many more reasons than not being motivated enough, though that is a major one.
Our health system being tied to our jobs, which act punitively towards us for missing any amount of work is another.
Our lowered education standards being another.
Our propagandized individualism another.
Many reasons. I can go on. I’ve thought about these long and hard.
6
consequentlydreamyMar 29, 2026
+1
So then you understand that we don’t have the culture of protesting like France has so let’s stop comparing. We have to look at where we are not where we SHOULD be. Yes I would love if everyone quit and walked out until we got what we wanted but I am realistic about what it takes to convince someone to vote nor the less call reps or otherwise. Don’t let perfectionism get in the way of progress. Is no kings perfect? No. I’d much rather have it than nothing at all and let that be the building block for things bigger later on. It’s a well promoted protest that gets people aware of local initiatives and organizers etc.
1
Charlie_MouseMar 29, 2026
Just saying but if this was France we were talking about then protestors would have burned down around half of Paris by now.
Joking aside: you’ve got the numbers and you’re getting out there which is a great start. But “a start” is all it is. Unless your protests can actually effect meaningful change or at bare minimum scare the c*** out of your government then it’s essentially all sound and fury signifying bugger all.
I’m not trying to diminish the achievement or commitment of all the people actually turning out today and for the other No Kings protests. But unless that translates into actual change then it’s not particularly useful is it?
0
SydasiatenMar 28, 2026
-5
What questions? The only question you wrote is what precedes disruptive protests? there where over 50k people in some cities today, how many f****** people do you need?
Nah all of you Americans can go f*** yourselves. Us foreigners have to face the real consequences while you guys do the bare minimum but never actually commit
Actual demonstrations are simple:
You cause economic disruptions and you employ civil disobedience. The first thing you need to do is not have it on a f****** Saturday. You Americans are so sheltered you think you can actually prevent fascism by holding hands and singing songs like it’s a Disney movie.
But sure take your time. The brown kids being killed by your tax money applaud your clever signs and record breaking numbers
-5
GnagusMar 29, 2026
+9
The frustration is fair but you're asking why Americans don't do weekday civil disobedience like it's just a matter of will. It isn't.
Skip work to protest in France and you have universal healthcare, strong labor protections, and union backing that makes retaliation difficult. Skip work to protest in the U.S. and you lose your job, your health insurance, and have almost no legal recourse because most Americans are at-will employees. The structural preconditions that make disruptive weekday protest viable in France simply don't exist here, and that's not an accident, it's by design.
And here's the thing: that same logic cuts both ways. Your country can't project geopolitical power the way the U.S. does either, and nobody's calling you a coward for it. The Netherlands isn't fielding the world's largest military. Indonesia isn't dominating global soft power. Those are consequences of scale, resources, and institutional history, not moral failure. We don't hold that against you, so explain to me why different rules apply when it goes the other direction.
You're holding Americans to a standard that only becomes achievable when your institutions are built to support it, then treating the absence of those institutions as a character flaw.
Nobody's saying the protests are enough. But "do what France does" isn't a solution. It's advice that ignores everything that would have to be true first for that advice to be actionable.
9
Grand_Size_4932Mar 28, 2026
+4
It’s not that I didn’t ask questions. It’s that you’re still dodging them.
How would you organize? Tell me.
Don’t just tell me that you would. Tell me how.
4
PredatorRedditerMar 29, 2026
+11
No Kings organizer is planning a general strike for May 1st... A weekday.
https://www.commondreams.org/news/no-kings-general-strike
11
consequentlydreamyMar 29, 2026
+8
No kings is much more a meeting ground for people of similar views to meet imo. It is great to attracting people into an easy form of movement that isn’t so scary because of how organized it is while also more radical and progressive protestors in attendance with typically their own flyers and programs. Like a good call to action, “if you showed up to this, you’ll probably want to know about XYZ.” It helps filter out people that are just casual but might want to get involved deeper. A lot of people will planning off grid protests will still show up to these
8
NullAnvoydMar 29, 2026
+2
The problem is for most people, meaningful things would cost them their jobs or more. Hard to really plan for protest and action when you've suddenly lost your income.
2
CarnivorzeMar 29, 2026
+1
You know this isn't a problem exclusive to the US right? People in other countries lost their jobs, were injured or even died protesting against authoritarian regimes. Protests are only as useful as they disrupt their intended target. By protesting on a weekend, you don't disrupt *anything*, so even with millions of people it will do nothing.
1
d_smoghMar 29, 2026
+1
March on the capital and reclaim your country.
1
Grand_Size_4932Mar 29, 2026
+2
Seattle to the capitol building is 2,766 miles (4,451 km) and 41 hours of nonstop driving.
March on the capitol? Do you understand why that’s not possible?
2
doegredMar 29, 2026
+2
The January 6 people somehow managed. The Civil Rights movement managed, decades ago.
2
d_smoghMar 29, 2026
+1
It will cost the entire GDP of 3 countries in petrol to drive that far. Start a solitary walking march across the country towards Washington, by the time you arrive millions would have joined.. it will rank alongside the [Jarrow crusade](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jarrow_March) London from 1936.
1
MissingString31Mar 28, 2026
+3
Sometimes you need to go number one and other times you need to go number two.
3
KurtotallMar 29, 2026
+6
It’s still cold out so nothing will happen. Just wait until May and things will get interesting.
6
christpunchersMar 29, 2026
+18
For comparison, the tea party protests that garnered a lot of TV time, government reaction, etc. had about 1/30th of the people across the US compared to the amount that showed up for no kings today (300k vs 9 mil). Really shows how astroturfed things can be when they are in favor or against the rich media masters.
18
ValiumBluesMar 29, 2026
+15
It’s great that Americans go out and protest.
It’s sad that America has allowed itself to go down the shitter for decades, leading to a lot of these folks not being able to protest the way we do in EU, for fear of losing their healthcare / benefits.
The average American has been complacent for too long, and I fear that a lot of these issues can’t get un-fucked anymore.
15
doegredMar 29, 2026
+1
>not being able to protest the way we do in EU, for fear of losing their healthcare / benefits.
A convenient comparison for apathetic Americans but people in developing countries also manage to protest much more thoroughly, even though they're not exactly super duper economically secure.
Hell, Americans have their own history of actually disruptive protest in e.g. the Civil Rights movement, which they're conveniently ignoring. I guess black Americans at the time were just swimming in cash.
1
ValiumBluesMar 29, 2026
+1
I’m in no shape or form ignoring the CR movement, but I also think the US gives itself too much credit for it.
People of colour are being treated far from equal; your prison population is overwhelmingly coloured; and systemic racism is almost ingrained in your culture.
As far as people in developing countries protesting goes: I’d argue most have less, or nothing to lose, compared to Americans. People don’t want to lose their comforts.
1
Intelligent_Read_43Mar 29, 2026
+7
Msnow covered it ALL day. You need to turn the channel.
7
wanderingpeddlarMar 28, 2026
+24
I think the picture shows Trumps people how to show thousands of people attending a rally.
24
Charlie_MouseMar 29, 2026
+3
I think the next time Trump holds a rally he’s going to use long distance shots of this event and claim that the crowds were for him.
3
OverthinkingWineauxMar 29, 2026
+2
And all over the world
2
BizarrebazaarsMar 29, 2026
+4
Bernie Sanders was there. So were Bruce Springsteen, Jane Fonda, Joan Baez, and several elected officials, activists, and more.
4
Cynical_ClassicistMar 29, 2026
+1
I do like to see these No Kings protests!
1
RomanceDawnOPMar 29, 2026
+1
Americans are just really bad at protesting, ya'll could learn so much from the French... Or so many others
1
TopChard1274Mar 29, 2026
+2
Almost 2 years into the term of a sociopath who ruins the world's order, thousands (over two hundreds of thousands overall in the whole USA according to some sources) protesting in a country of several hundreds of millions of grownups are nothing to write home about. God bless the people who got out in the streets but these news are depressing for how little the vast majority of USA cares about the c*** we're all in.
2
KlepdarMar 29, 2026
+2
8 million. Not a couple hundred thousand.
2
Nicholas-SteelMar 29, 2026
+1
And worked well as a huge distraction from what Trump and the military are doing, as most news stations are only covering the rally.
1
SanshaXIIMar 28, 2026
-30
Your weekend parades are accomplishing nothing. Trump and his people aren't stopping or even slowing. You need to do better.
Imagine if all the Colonists did was march on the weekends, imagine if that's all the French Resistance did.
Without pro-activity, Trump is doomed to succeed and be safe. You are not removing him without force this time.
-30
hajensoMar 29, 2026
+5
You need to get much, much more specific about who "you" is, if your opinion is to be of any use.
5
SanshaXIIMar 29, 2026
+2
American citizens... ? Who have the right to keep and bear arms?
2
hajensoMar 29, 2026
+1
"American citizens" is way too big a category for an opinion like this to be useful. Sure, we all have well-considered opinions about what our entire national population ought to collectively do. Useless, until individual people and their already-existing organized communities have a practical, available route to produce that wider collective action.
1
SanshaXIIMar 29, 2026
+3
You have the Second Amendment. No other nation on the planet has such a privilege. It was written with the express purpose of being the final out for a tyrant government.
I'm not kidding, I'm not being hyperbolic, I'm not trying to be badass or any somesuch like that - I'm actually wondering, the whole rest of the world is wondering, at what point one of the 83 million of you currently holding is going to apply that Amendment - for, again, its expressely written purpose.
Otherwise, you may as well revoke it if you can't be bothered using it. In fact, I hope more and more Americans lose that and more and more rights as time goes on and you all, collectively and individually both, do nothing.
3
RedditAdminEvasionMar 29, 2026
+2
Robots downvoting your comment, you are absolutely right. Too many people have the disney mentality of "the good guys will win because they are good", but it doesn't work like that. This isn't saying I support Trump or him remaining in power, but people are far too callow thinking these protests actually impact anything in the White House
2
0xd34db347Mar 28, 2026
I read this in Eor's voice because you are a doomscrolling clown. Maybe save your bloviating for after midterms when democracy has a chance to course correct.
0
MalaixMar 28, 2026
+1
People get mad at this but its true. You kind of need clearly stated goals and aims you can achieve, they probably need to be prolonged functionally sieges of economic systems and society (why protesters often march on highways blocking traffic, that is disruptive) and you need to f*** with the money. Its the peaceful way of changing things.
Like what is no kings? You march around within the permitted spaces with the permitted demonstrations and tell someone who is at every level of their being a rapist that you dislike them?
To someone like Trump being told you hate what he is doing to you is foreplay in his mind. He already knows at least some people dislike him. Even through his carefully curated media bubble I am sure that is getting through.
Whether he is able to believe that is another story. But he absolutely doesn't want to listen to you if you tell him that. He just wants to hurt you more.
Also his minions would be facing prison if they lose power so telling them you disapprove of them also doesn't budge the needle much.
1
cennep44Mar 29, 2026
+1
Exactly. I'm watching this from outside the US and I'm wondering what the point of it is. It's just a generic protest against the government of the day. Seen in many countries every year. I look at the placards and they're a laundry list of random grievances and complaints. I doubt the protestors agree on all those issues. And what do they want?
They'd have a better chance of success if they kept their message simple and their goals achievable. Instead it's scattergun and will go nowhere. The protests in my country about the enironment and stopping oil etc., I didn't agree with their tactics but they worked. They blocked roads and committed vandalism against banks etc. It made the news regularly. They made themselves too annoying to ignore. Also they cared about their cause sufficiently to get arrested and jailed.
Most Americans just don't feel that strongly about Trump or they'd be doing a lot more than they are doing. So long as their bellies are full and they have 'gas' for their 'truck' they don't much care about the rest of the world, or even their neighbour.
1
willow_you_idiotMar 28, 2026
-6
Gandhi proved otherwise.
-6
MalaixMar 28, 2026
+8
Ghandi disrupted the money and it was more than a weekend. The salt law resistance resulted in tens of thousands of arrests.
In order for protests to be successful you need achivable demands stated, you need prolonged persistant organized resistance like how BLM basically siege cities for weeks on end with demonstrations, and you need to f*** with the money. You need to boycott, you need to strike, you need to disrupt.
Usually the impactful kind of peaceful protest is the kind that gets you arrested at some point because the powers that be will always choose suppression first.
Buckling to change is when that fails.
8
NotAboutWordsMar 28, 2026
+3
Gandhi stuck around for more than two hours, twice a year
3
SydasiatenMar 28, 2026
+2
Ghandi and the Indian independence movement employed economic disruption and civil disobedience in a way that actually affected the British empire negatively. Please don’t compare that to this one day demonstration on a fkn Saturday
2
SanshaXIIMar 29, 2026
Gandhi's people actually caused disruption and disobedience, and actually made the difficult choices and sacrifices to do it.
By marching on the weekends, you disrupt nothing. By going back to work on Monday, you disobey nobody.
0
Jamie00003Mar 29, 2026
-4
Why’s it called a no kings protest? Trump isn’t a king
-4
wanderingpeddlarMar 29, 2026
+2
Tell that to the Pedo in Chief.
2
sweetlemon69Mar 29, 2026
+3
These people don't understand things rationally.
3
wanderingpeddlarMar 29, 2026
LOL right... what ever helps you make it through a night.
200,000 people at an event whos main focus is pointing out the Pedo in Chief is almost always trying to grab more power then he is allowed. That number is ONE event in ONE city.
You know the saying about if you meet one a****** they are the a******, if everyone you meet is an a****** your the a******? Seems like TACO is claiming everyone is an a******. :)
But there is no need to get all up in your FeeFees about it if you don' t like the protests.
Just hide in the basement for a day and pretend nothing is happening.
That should get you through until the little thing called midterms come around.
0
[deleted]Mar 28, 2026
-9
[deleted]
-9
AHugeHildaFanMar 29, 2026
+8
Your comment history shows you talking about the first No Kings with "Why aren't they at work?"
8
yawara25Mar 29, 2026
+5
Funny how conservatives can't seem to wrap their head around the idea that maybe not all jobs are 9-5 Monday to Friday
5
wag00nMar 29, 2026
+2
What have you personally done on repeated days during work days to make a difference?
137 Comments