· 198 comments · Save ·
For Sale Apr 19, 2026 at 9:55 PM

Tina Fey Has Realized She “Was On The Wrong Side” With Certain ‘SNL’ Jokes: “I Was Pretty Dumb”

Posted by mlg1981


Tina Fey On Being "On The Wrong Side" With Some 'SNL' Jokes
Deadline
Tina Fey On Being "On The Wrong Side" With Some 'SNL' Jokes
Twenty years after her time on 'Saturday Night Live' came to an end, Tina Fey recently looked back on some of the heavier current events they covered.

🚩 Report this post

198 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
Suchgallbladder 5 days ago +2644
Tina Fey is quietly doing the legwork for a very high profile job. She’s getting SNL when Lorne retires, it’s obvious.
2644
scruffigan 5 days ago +1140
I would love that for her and for us. She's a fantastic talent.
1140
LastGoodKnee 5 days ago +126
Why would you love that for her. In some ways she’s already been a bigger star than Lorne will ever be
126
scruffigan 5 days ago +37
She has seen enormous success. Which is why I think it's safe to assume that if she takes the job, it's because she really actually wants to do the job.
37
Yeshavesome420 5 days ago +360
Tina Fey is very talented and prolific in her own right, yes, but Lorne Michaels is responsible for the trajectory of scripted comedy as we know it. Lorne is a kingmaker. Tina taking over would give her the ability to steer the ship for the next generation of comedic actors and writers. Here’s hoping she understands what is needed for the future of the art form.
360
DrizzleDrake88 5 days ago +40
I do recall an interview with Conan O’Brien. He said he wouldn’t have had his initial Late Night show without a vouch from Lorne to audition.
40
Hey-Bud-Lets-Party 5 days ago +17
Lorne was the developer of that show. Conan was his choice.
17
xiandgaf 5 days ago +99
Generationssss. It’d be like if a much funnier version of Alexandria Ocasio Cortez got appointed to the Supreme Court
99
Pezzzz490 5 days ago +33
Rather see her as POTUS!
33
IdesofMarchHair 5 days ago +32
And Amy Poehler for VP!
32
DC-Toronto 5 days ago +13
I’d prefer Julia Louise Dreyfus (sp?)
13
Timely-Jelly-1126 4 days ago +3
The most underrated comedy of the century!
3
CharDeeMacDennisII 5 days ago +10
Hard agree! Tina Fey for POTUS!
10
bocephus607 5 days ago +30
Cause it’s an incredible opportunity to run one of the greatest American comedian incubators in history. She can try to re-establish opportunities she had and help ensure young comedy writers and actors can still get paid for their talent. She needs to compete with a modern market and money matters for that, but I suspect for her, personally, it’s matriarchal.
30
AdZealousideal5383 5 days ago +24
Lorne never wanted to be the star. He wanted to be the king.
24
BalashstarGalactica 3 days ago +2
I think he tried and he realized he wasn’t as good in front of the camera. He was supposed to be the original Weekend Update anchor.
2
AdZealousideal5383 3 days ago +3
He was on Canadian TV, too. I could actually see his deadpan style working on weekend update, although it would not have been revolutionary the way Chevy’s weekend update was.
3
AlarmingBeing8114 5 days ago +31
So we cant be happy she gets a dream gig? In some ways being a star isn't the same as having the best behind the scenes job ever.
31
calcteacher 5 days ago +18
Lorne a star? Star maker I suggest. Gatekeeper.
18
maplestriker 5 days ago +3
Because it's not about celebrity but real power and influence
3
BobiaDobia 5 days ago +2
You’re comparing apples to oranges
2
Soggy-Fly9242 5 days ago +2
Being a star and being a generational legend are very different things
2
duaneap 5 days ago +211
In my opinion that is a lower profile job than her current job of making and starring in quality films and tv shows.
211
kahner 5 days ago +244
i think being head of SNL could be a massive legacy for her though. it's an iconic show with decades of history and she could remake and reinvigorate.
244
kylaroma 5 days ago +88
This. Being Lorne’s successor is a HUGE honor and booking SNL makes you an absolute force in pop culture.
88
kahner 5 days ago +17
yeah. maybe 1 movie and 1 or 2 tv shows a decade make a truly lasting culture impact, and really none of them can do what 15 years of running SNL can. or at least what SNL used to do. i'm not sure any show will be able to have the impact of SNL in the modern media environment, but if she gets it, we'll see.
17
HoneyImpossible2371 5 days ago +6
In an era of streaming and AI, the concept of time s****, Saturday night, and live performances feels cathartic: “Other people are experiencing this moment as I do.” But in other ways, the tempo of weekly editions seems too slow like music stuck in a verse-chorus-bridge formula in the age of Jazz.
6
entertainman 5 days ago +2
It’s a pigeon hole though. Her talent could go to great things and instead her time will be spent focusing on a clock cycle over output quality.
2
Q0T3 5 days ago +37
I've always loved her style I think it would be a great thing.
37
DopeYeti 5 days ago +2
In the words of Mike Tyson “Legacy doesn’t mean anything. We’re all dust.” I totally agree with this being a huge step down for her career wise. Can we all agree that SNL f****** sucks, and has sucked for a while? Phenomenal improv talents shouldn’t have to resort to lazy writing/performing to “try to make it big”
2
prettyboylee 5 days ago +2
I’m not sure she’ll make anything more iconic than Mean Girls. Not because she won’t make anything iconic, but Mean Girls is just that iconic.
2
svdomer09 5 days ago +21
IDK. Lorne Michael's work on SNL also results in him producing a lot of the shows and movies from the SNL alumni. I can imagine with her experience doing that already it would be even more so for her.
21
sobi-one 5 days ago +31
Regardless of what any of us on Listnook think of the show, SNL is one of the most iconic, prestigious, and valuable shows in television history.
31
Silver_South_1002 5 days ago +2
American television, we never really got it down under and I still don’t find it that funny
2
evilpercy 5 days ago +72
She really has not done either of these since 2013.
72
caitkincaid 5 days ago +54
The Four Seasons series on Netflix she starred in last year was pretty great tho
54
DFL3 5 days ago +5
It was pretty great, though oddly they’re doing another season?
5
MargieBigFoot 5 days ago +3
The second season comes out May 28th
3
Fabray13 5 days ago +62
Kimmy Schmidt premiered in 2015, and she was always great on Only Murders.
62
Newyorkgirl18 5 days ago +6
Yes and she has a big storyline coming up in season 6 of Only Murders
6
RollTh3Maps 5 days ago +6
She was great in those, but they said starring.
6
Fabray13 5 days ago +4
You’re right, I read their comment as a joke that everything she’s done since 2013 has sucked, so I was just pointing out some good stuff she’s done lol.
4
RollTh3Maps 5 days ago +4
Fair thing to point out.
4
arlekin21 5 days ago +3
They also said making and she did make Kimmy Schmidt
3
rufio313 5 days ago +17
Kimmy Schmidt came out so long ago I forgot it was a show. And she has been a side character in Only Murders…not sure I’d consider that starring in a show
17
Fabray13 5 days ago +9
Yeah, it’s just a guest role. Kimmy Schmidt only officially ended five years ago, but Netflix removed the series finale movie, so there’s no point in even watching the show now.
9
TCsnowdream 5 days ago +15
The show came out when I returned to America after living abroad for a decade. Living in an East Asian country is its own, insulated thing. Like yeah, I heard *some* things from America but… 99% of things were filtered through that country’s lens and it had its own culture it was deeply proud of. Anyways, that made me feel like a complete stranger in my own ‘home country’. And I very much felt like Kimmy. My references were a decade old. My slang was a decade old. My celebrity, movie, and political knowledge was a decade old. It was f****** weird. But UKS really helped me laugh at the absurdity of it all. It did help that I was also living in Brooklyn at the time lol.
15
Ok-Reflection-5216 5 days ago +5
Why would they remove the finale?
5
Fabray13 5 days ago +14
It was one of those *choose your own adventure* things Netflix made a few of (Black Mirror, Bandersnatch, being the most famous), they removed all of them. It’s really annoying.
14
butiamthechosenone 5 days ago +9
I think it was because it was one of their “choose your own adventure” movies and Netflix removed those. However imo the kimmy Schmidt one was the only one that worked
9
Flemz 5 days ago +8
She’ll be one of the stars of next season of *Only Murders* tho
8
sailorxsaturn 5 days ago +34
I mean she's a producer on the fall and rise of Reggie dinkins which came out this year and I think is great
34
KelVarnsen_2023 5 days ago +5
One of the funniest shows on TV. Makes me think that Robert Carlock should take over SNL. He basically has the exact same behind the scenes resume as her, but he doesn't have the performing career she would likely have to give up if she became SNL boss.
5
evilpercy 5 days ago +2
I was answering a poster that stated she was too busy to produce SNL because she was staring in TV and films.
2
Message_10 5 days ago +16
She's produced a couple of things after 30 Rock that have been successful. That said, I think her "first love" is improv / sketch comedy. I can see her going back. Either her or Seth Meyers.
16
PastimeOfMine 5 days ago +8
She just EP'ed Reggie Dinkins to get it off the ground with her co-creator of Kimmy Schmidt...
8
TCsnowdream 5 days ago +3
“Me baby me no go night night” begs to differ.
3
Material-Macaroon298 5 days ago +2
I agree. However Fey would be the first to say that older women don’t have great career longevity as actresses. Although it’s certainly better than it has been in the past and also Fey has the benefit of being such a good writer she could write herself movies. SNL though would be a steady massive pay cheque. If Fey wants to just quietly get rich it’s a good role. She can also come and do the sketches though.
2
revolutionoverdue 5 days ago +2
And she made wine country (maybe the worst movie of the last 10 years)
2
Lokishougan 5 days ago +2
Yes but she also knows Hollywood is very mean to women as they get older and will have less and less of those roles over teh next few years
2
NoFuel1197 5 days ago +3
Not a chance. Maybe if she were also producing huge movies, you might be right, but she’s not behind any summer blockbusters. Having the pull to play kingmaker in the comedy world, a massive budget to play with secured by the corporate veil, and all of the people that want those things too at your beck and call outpaces being an actor over any amount of time.
3
BadAtExisting 5 days ago +48
Are we holding it against people trying to evolve? I’m 48. Things that were acceptable to joke about when I was a kid and teenager were different than what was acceptable by my late 20s and that’s even different from what is now acceptable. And yeah, believe it or not, there are things we joke about today that won’t be acceptable in the future. Like one can genuinely and sincerely evolve with the times AND be in the running for/be next in line for high profile job like SNL
48
AffectionateSwan5129 5 days ago +8
Every cycle of young people think the previous jokes from 20 years ago were over the top… I mean, current kids and young adults enjoy watching TikTok prank videos on meta glasses of people just harassing and “pranking” people who are just minding their own business. That is insane and will probably be frowned upon in years to come.
8
BadAtExisting 5 days ago +4
That bullshit is frowned upon now to be fair
4
kahner 5 days ago +25
being inaugural host for SNL UK also points that way.
25
evilpercy 5 days ago +11
He is 81.
11
No_Hana 5 days ago +3
I have nothing against her but I highly doubt this claim. Have you seen how television and shit get sold these days?
3
RavioliContingency 5 days ago +4
Ohhhhh interesting catch. As she should because I really turned on how I perceived her when I noticed the weird f****** Asian/Native/ etc stereotypes she would fit in as much as she could since 30 Rock and the cake incident.
4
RunnyPlease 5 days ago +3
I see where you’re going with this but I think Kenan Thompson is the more likely to take that s***. Tina Fey doesn’t have to take SNL. She has options across film and television. Kenan on the other hand is the longest running cast member in the history of the show. He has a few credits here and there but for the last 2 decades SNL has been the lions share of his career.
3
Suchgallbladder 5 days ago +10
I agree Kenan is a good choice and everyone would be happy with it. But time in position does not equal qualified to do the job. Tina Fey has grown into a very competent executive producer, showrunner, director, etc. She’s got industry connections like no other. She’s at every 5 timers celebration so that big name celebrities are associated with her, she was the inaugural guest on SNL UK, she had a show (where she was the EP) that literally spoofed SNL. The show is hers, it’s obvious. Other than being a long term cast member Kenan hasn’t done all the behind the scenes work like she has. She’s much more qualified.
10
browsinbowser 5 days ago +2
That’s some good points 
2
GoodtimeZappa 5 days ago +8
Nope. She's going to continuing what she's doing without the stress of the SNL work week, make more money, and not be tarnished by running the show. No one can win, running this show.
8
impy695 5 days ago +6
I disagree. She'd get an immediate ratings boost just from people wanting to see what snl run by her looks like. If she does well, and she's a comedic genius, she could absolutely make it big again. It'll never be the same as when we had monoculture, but snl is perfect for short form content if they do it right
6
robzombie03 5 days ago +6
I figured Keenan at this point. He has been there forever.
6
JadrianInc 5 days ago +337
30 Rock is a fever dream.
337
makk73 5 days ago +174
But so f****** funny
174
bubba1834 5 days ago +55
“That guy has a gun” “Yeah but don’t worry he’s not a cop”
55
flydog2 5 days ago +59
Girls5Eva is not 30 Rock but is also hilarious and weird; it was definitely an unexpected favorite.
59
KWash0222 5 days ago +15
Really hope that show gets picked up somewhere else. It’s ridiculous in the best way, and the comedic timing excellent
15
Kirikenku 4 days ago +7
I MISCOUNTED THE MEN, LIZ
7
at-woork 5 days ago +4
Good God, Lemon, you shot a Black!
4
MaggsToRiches 5 days ago +4
Wade Boggs Carpet World!
4
lewisfrancis 5 days ago +453
Shame the article didn't mention any specifics, not sure she was ever on the wrong side of her Palin impression, so now I'm curious.
453
LurkerBurkeria 5 days ago +392
Having just rewatched 30Rock it holds up tremendously but the first few seasons in particular are rife with casual gay jokes and racial humor that wouldn't fly today, nothing's really beyond the pale but quite a few punchlines made me raise my eyebrows
392
reenactment 5 days ago +147
I don’t understand why gay jokes are seen as off limits. People should laugh at gay jokes strait jokes white jokes black jokes bald jokes fat jokes skinny jokes rich jokes poor jokes. If it’s in good nature and is just poking fun at something, what’s the issue? If you can’t laugh at societal tropes, then you are too sensitive. There’s a difference between a joke and hate filled rhetoric.
147
Junius_Bobbledoonary 5 days ago +286
Gay jokes aren’t seen as off limits. Go watch any gay comedian. Gay jokes where the punchline is “being gay is gross and bad” are seen as off limits. Those jokes wouldn’t fly today.
286
ScreenMuch90210 5 days ago +153
Amateur comedian here. Gay jokes are fine when they’re funny, even really mean ones can work if the punchline is worth it. The main problem comes when there just…….. isn’t a punchline, and the comedian just wants you to laugh at the concept of gayness. That’s the only thing you absolutely have to avoid, and it’s easy.
153
SpinerockNolan 5 days ago +68
I have a similar reaction to fat jokes. As a fat dude, a well constructed or out of pocket fat joke is usually pretty funny. But when the joke is just "this guy is fat and thus disgusting, laugh at him" it's just boring and barely even counts as comedy
68
pizzac00l 5 days ago +12
You just accurately described why I have a visceral rejection of any movie with Melissa McCartney in it (after Bridesmaids). You know right off the bat that a majority of the jokes in any given scene that she’s in will be at her weight’s expense
12
Greatsnes 5 days ago +11
Yeah her and Rebel Wilson. The “lol she’s fat and okay with it” shtick got old reeeal fast when it was done in every single movie.
11
camergen 5 days ago +7
“Oop! Now she’s trying to run! And it’s not going well, cause she’s so big! Oh, that loveable oaf!”
7
oadge 5 days ago +5
Good news! She lost a lot of weight! Bad news! Her comedy is still exactly the same!
5
alvysinger0412 5 days ago +2
Which is a shame because I do believe she's got talent beyond making jokes about her own weight.
2
MichaelMyersEatsDogs 5 days ago +13
Non amateur comedian here. Being funny doesn’t make a joke ok. People say you shouldn’t have to explain a joke, which can be debated all day. Something that’s not up for debate is that you should be able to explain every joke you make. Every joke I’ve ever written I can explain the set up, punchline, comedic premise, type of execution and most importantly: the target or butt of the joke. Making a joke about aspects of the gay community is one thing. Making jokes where the butt of the joke is that someone is gay (or black, or a woman or any other inherent quality) isn’t. If a comedian can’t explain their joke they are either a hack or know it’s fucked up.
13
AdvanceLow7128 5 days ago +15
As a gay man who went to the University of Wyoming I always found this joke good. What do gay dudes and tumble weeds have in common? They blow and blow and blow until they wind up on a fence in Wyoming. I used to have the easiest job ever next door to the bar Mathew Shepard was picked up in. I could do 4 times the quota in 1 hour so I would just leave for the other part of my shift. Nobody could say anything about it because I was their top quota maker. My friend's roommate was the bartender there. He would charge me for one drink and let me drink for free the rest of the time. He was the gay dude that told me that joke while I sat in that dark empty bar where Matthew Shepard used to hang out.
15
Admirable_Fun7790 5 days ago +18
That’s fucked up man
18
Junius_Bobbledoonary 5 days ago +2
The key to this joke working is that the punchline isn’t “being gay is gross and bad”. It’s just a dark joke that happens to be about a gay man.
2
ImpossibleMess5211 5 days ago +51
Strong agree. I’m a lesbian and I think queer jokes are hilarious. There’s absolutely a difference between a joke and thinly-veiled hate speech, but it’s not something I’ve ever seen from Tina Fey/30 Rock
51
not_a_moogle 5 days ago +12
Thats just it, a good gay joke cant have the punch line be 'ew, they're gay'
12
CitizenCue 5 days ago +10
Gay jokes aren’t a problem. It’s when “because he’s gay!” is the entire joke that it’s not funny or clever or interesting. It’s just making fun of a group of people as though their existence is itself funny.
10
Elliott_Cusick 5 days ago +3
there’s also a difference between creativity and punching up vs laziness and punching down. just cause someone’s intentions are good doesn’t mean it’s in good nature. a lot of people make pretty boring and dumb jokes and rely on shock value. they deserve to be criticized, especially if it’s their job
3
Dazzling-Bear3942 5 days ago +14
Gay jokes are not off limits buy bad gay jokes are. When I was younger a classic joke that I know I definitely used on occasion was: Guy friend #1 "I had a hot date last night Guy friend #2 " What was his name?" Funny for a time but the joke hinges on the idea that being gay is a negative. Those are the types of jokes she is talking about.
14
Short-Draw4057 5 days ago +6
I don't think it's reasonable nor American for you to tell people what they should or shouldn't laugh at. This seems oddly controlling and we have the freedom of speech/expression to laugh or entertain or tell any/whatever joke while also having the same freedom to not laugh at those same jokes or critique them. I also think comedy should have a conscious point. Poking light harmless fun at certain ideas, societal constructs, cultures, or even certain types of people or groups can be OK imo, but ruthlessly attacking individuals isn't ok. There is an issue because punching down in a world full of serious issues can cause more wide spread issues, and really depending on the joke, there is no difference between that and hate filled rhetoric. Its ironic your usage of the word "sensitive" here, it seems you are sensitive and offended over others simply not wanting to be mean and laugh at everyone. That's also their right. Would you feel the same if you or your racial/gender/ideology etc. group was the target of the joke?
6
tarheelz1995 5 days ago +6
Race, gender, religion, and sexual orientation should never be off-limits as to jokes. Jokes promoting discrimination and hate have always been off-limits. It’s an odd moment when progressive comedians find themselves scared of their own sense of humor. Correctness as an unstated censor to humor is a cancer.
6
heavyhandedpour 5 days ago +16
Lemon had a line about Avery, “oh she made maxims top 100 I’d r*** that list” wow that was funny in such a shitty feeling way
16
MichaelMyersEatsDogs 5 days ago +46
That’s not a joke making fun of r*** though. It’s making fun of Maxim readers and their misogyny.
46
Paniaguapo 3 days ago +3
It's shit like this, the only people who are offended aren't really
3
karmint1 5 days ago +17
This offended you as a Maxim subscriber?
17
320_central 5 days ago +9
That joke is about how f****** weird lists are. Not a r*** joke directly
9
jokerhound80 5 days ago +9
They had a whole multi season subplot where Frank was raped by his teacher and married her after she gets out of prison.
9
multi-trollionaire 5 days ago +8
OH NO NOT..... JOKES!!!! *AHHHHHHH*
8
lomubz 5 days ago +5
There’s a YouTube montage somewhere with her and racial jokes.
5
HomsarWasRight 5 days ago +8
I don’t know about the Palin one. They actually did, inadvertently, make Palin more likable. They even wrote that into 30 Rock later on with Tracy and Gov. Dunston. Edit: I’d also like to note that she started in ‘97, which means she almost certainly was in the room for a lot of the Lewinsky stuff. And let me tell you, looking back at it now it’s *f****** awful*. The most powerful man in the world took advantage of an intern and *SHE* was the one raked over the coals. SNL, along with the entire media landscape, was on the wrong side of that one.
8
dollabillkirill 5 days ago +7
She was head writer when Kid Rock made the joke about the Olsen Twins “if there’s grass on the field play ball” joke on update
7
s33n_ 4 days ago +2
Its a bullshit catch-all apology for any future indicts that may come when she gets the snl gig.
2
Kind-Armadillo-2340 5 days ago +399
Comedy usually ages poorly. It’s not a big deal.
399
rjcarr 5 days ago +137
Except George Carlin. 
137
sir_slothsalot 5 days ago +110
George stopped writing comedy and just basically wrote philosophy with a rhythm 
110
CarrieDurst 5 days ago +20
And Mel Brooks mostly
20
Used-Cartographer84 5 days ago +7
Yes. Rip to the goat
7
duaneap 5 days ago +33
His Joe Pesci bit is a bit eh. But he did say “Usually,” not everyone. Self deprecation often ages pretty well, certainly a lot better than anyone trying to do cultural commentary. Rodney Dangerfield’s stuff legit still hilarious.
33
Daimoth 5 days ago +2
The... joe pesci religion bit? Of all his jokes, why does that one stick out for you?
2
duaneap 5 days ago +4
Because he couldn’t have known at the time but Joe Pesci would appear on SNL and essentially say he would beat up tiny waif of a woman, Sinead O’Connor, for insulting his religion. By tearing up a photograph of a man defending child molesters in Ireland. Big, tough guy, Joe Pesci may not have been the best choice for this particular bit.
4
wwannaburgerswncock 5 days ago +17
He was philosophizing for applause, not making jokes that were funny
17
Rainaco 5 days ago +11
Yeah. He’s too preachy. I don’t find him funny at all
11
wwannaburgerswncock 5 days ago +3
I feel vindicated people act like you have to like him. I often agree with what he’s saying it just isn’t funny
3
mcmcc 5 days ago +4
Comics say funny things. Comedians say things funny. Carlin definitely leaned towards the latter, tho tbh I found him only occasionally funny and often annoyingly self-righteous.
4
myboogerstastespicy 5 days ago +3
Mitch Hedberg, too.
3
KeithClossOfficial 5 days ago +3
His both sides stuff aged extremely poorly.
3
Background-Jury-1914 5 days ago +62
This is the right take. All comedy is reflective of the current moment and almost none of it ages well. All the current comedy is def going to age badly, mostly because it’s all so gentle and predictable on the left and pandering to the lowest common denominator on the right.
62
Short-Draw4057 5 days ago +9
Not true at all but ok. Theres good timeless comedy as well.
9
KeithClossOfficial 5 days ago +4
Seriously. I Love Lucy is coming up on 80 years old and has tons of stuff that aged so well it is still influencing TV being made today. There’s definitely some very aged stuff in it (Ricky spanking Lucy comes to mind), but to say no comedy ages well is wild
4
satanssweatycheeks 5 days ago +19
Comedy that toes the line never ages well. Comedy that is light hearted can be timeless. Like Monty python or Mr bean is stuff any age can laugh at. And won’t ever be offensive. But stuff like blazing saddles pushed barriers but also had jokes that didn’t age well.
19
Quest-at-WF 5 days ago +39
Monty Python had plenty of edgy, potentially offensive bits.
39
MasterOfManyWorlds 5 days ago +22
What jokes didn't age well in blazing saddles?
22
ehtw376 5 days ago +8
I am white as hell but I came across a post on one of the black sublistnooks talking about movies that made them feel uncomfortable and there was a pretty highly upvoted comment about Blazing Saddles - basically some younger black people didn’t see eye to eye with it vs their parents.
8
Nighthawk700 5 days ago +2
I could see that. When blazing saddles came out, progress was being made and momentum against racism was going the right direction. Nowadays there is a growing movement the other way and it doesn't feel like something to joke about.
2
morosco 5 days ago +3
Thrre's a few gay slurs and racial slurs that you can't use in any comedy context now. Some racial sterotypes are leaned into. And r*** jokes aren't really a thing anymore I'd say the underlying messaging of Blazing Saddles aged great, but, the story would just need softer tools to tell now.
3
Background-Jury-1914 5 days ago +39
This is just wrong. There’s plenty of Monty Python that is sharp cutting. They use racial slurs in sketches, sharply critique class, and have gender stereotypes mixed in amid the absurdity. The Life of Brian was considered blasphemous when it came out because it was so line crossing. Also plenty of “light hearted” humor ages like shit. Look at Full House and Family Matters. Look at the 80s observational stand up comedy trend or the “random humor” of millennial comedy in the early aughts. The parts of Seinfeld that aged the best are the edgy harder elements. Shit, I’d argue Ted Lasso is just a few years old but has already aged badly.
39
beatupford 5 days ago +11
Why would you argue Lasso is aging badly?
11
Used-Cartographer84 5 days ago +6
I agreed until the Ted lasso thing 
6
EggsAndRice7171 5 days ago +7
Mony python was considered very envelope pushing at the time and was banned in several places including Ireland and Norway on release. It might age well relatively but it’s alot different than how people used to see it. It used to be considered an edgy movie.
7
Cool-Newspaper6789 5 days ago +3
Comedy either ages poorly or prophetic. If neither than it probably wasn't actually funny 
3
reenactment 5 days ago +2
It shouldn’t age poorly. The same way we contextually do research on people and the way they thought and why they thought, should be the same for anything else.
2
IamaSingingTelegram_ 5 days ago +2
Some ages more poorly than others. Airplane! And Revenge of the Nerds were both released in the early 80s. And why should we downplay it? Some of her work aged better than others, and she's acknowledging how she's grown. She should be celebrated for this, not downplayed
2
blewwholeload 5 days ago +490
I don’t think it’s necessary to apologize for jokes from a different time. Things change. You adapt to the times you’re in. There are words I don’t use today that I did all the time in high school. I’m not gonna apologize to the communities those words were offensive to. My “penance” is not using them anymore. It doesn’t need to be any more complicated than that.
490
pumper911 5 days ago +169
Agreed but this is why I’m glad social media wasn’t around when I was in high school
169
iPukey 5 days ago +71
I was such an idiot in high school :/ I had this whole edgelord philosophy about how by society ‘making’ certain words offensive, we gave them power, and the way to take that power away was by using the words casually… so I was really helping by throwing the n word around ironically. I had to delete tons of tweets when I suddenly remembered this in a start in the middle of the night several years ago.
71
ZubatCountry 5 days ago +19
I think that's a pretty normal phase to go through. Just part of testing boundaries and understanding the world more. The important thing is you did it as a teenager and grew beyond it. Unfortunately there's a lot of grown ass adults concern-trolling about why they can't say slurs designed specifically to upset people without people getting upset with them. I think what you and most people realized and what they do not is just how ultimately lame it is. It seems edgy when you're in the middle of it, but to anyone watching you just always come off dumber than everybody else and not like you're thinking outside the societal box.
19
inflagra 5 days ago +18
Thank God I was too old for social media and cell phone cameras.
18
waitwhatreallycmon 5 days ago +19
Maybe it’s not necessary. Maybe she just wants to
19
epiphanyWednesday 5 days ago +12
Imagine if your jokes were available now and posted all over the internet. It seems like a fair and logical thing to share that youve evolved.
12
NOTTedMosby 5 days ago +10
The fact that it's not necessary makes the apology all the more meaningful. And if she wants to and it clears her mind, i don't see the harm
10
MollyRolls 5 days ago +51
Maybe not necessary, but I think it’s good and also useful to model personal growth: that it’s possible, and how it looks when it happens. I grew up with a lot of beliefs and assumptions I now recognize as racist, in spite of fervently believing racism was wrong. I was well into my 30’s before I was able to recognize a framework in which a person could sincerely consider themselves an ally while continuing to do damage, and I think that’s a useful thing for *most* people to understand. Some people want to do harm and maybe they’re a lost cause, but there are a whole lot of “normal” people who could benefit from seeing that meaning well means you need to keep evolving and self-evaluating. And that you can.
51
shes_a_gdb 5 days ago +12
This is my biggest beef when people call certain politicians flip floppers. People grow. They change opinions on things. I'm certainly not the same person I was 10-20 years ago. Identifying you were wrong about something is a great trait to have.
12
Etzell 5 days ago +37
I think there's a difference between saying something in high school and saying something on a nationally televised show seen by millions of people and living on in perpetuity on Youtube. Your penance is appropriate for your circumstance. Tina's penance is saying "hey, some of those jokes sucked and I was dumb". She doesn't need to go on an apology tour, but her acknowledging past mistakes is appropriate.
37
unwocket 5 days ago +8
I agree but the internet is very picky/choosy with how they apply this mindset
8
realfakejames 5 days ago +6
All this means if you’re lucky there was no social media around at the time If your friends and colleagues and children could see videos of you saying the slurs you used in high school it would change how they see you even if you don’t use them anymore Pretending this doesn’t apply to everyone is disingenuous, celebs are routinely punished for things they said and did 10-20 years ago, all you did was get lucky
6
KendalBoy 5 days ago +10
It’s okay to admit your mistakes, and accepting sexist c*** is a mistake many women have made in their careers. Like Tina, we’re not enthusiastic about keeping our mouths shut about it. That’s too much to ask.
10
1egg_4u 5 days ago +5
I would argue the apology is necessary to prove that we made that progress and show our growth culturally Im happy she acknowledges it too because it means I dont feel like an a****** watching a joke that aged poorly from her older work knowing if she had another chance maybe it would be different I like Tina Fey's writing, I am always happy to not be disappointed by someone doubling down on hurting other people. I want to believe in capacity for change and in human redemption. Apologies are a part of that... we should be normalizing sincere apologies. Pretty sure a lot of our problems wouldnt be problems right now if people could just fess up to being human and f****** up a bit.
5
IdealizedSalt 5 days ago +11
What does it cost you to say, “I shouldn’t have said that. I’m sorry,”? Also, why did you put quotes around “penance”? No one said that but you.
11
Different-Monitor-66 5 days ago +13
Yeah not gonna lie it’s giving I’m not really going to apologize because that would mean taking accountability, and it’s meant to be “overcomplicated” especially when you don’t understand the power behind those words you used or even just know its effect. No one is asking you to grovel and apologize but even just like the above comment said a simple “I shouldn’t have been saying that” would have sufficed instead said “penance” as if it’s punishment enough to not use those words.
13
sans-delilah 5 days ago +92
There are some gags in 30 rock that haven’t aged super well, beyond just the blackface. It’s still totally watchable, and still a top tier sitcom, but there are some bits.
92
FondantSucks 5 days ago +28
Tracy Morgan IS black. That’s not offensive
28
Parking_Crazy 5 days ago +27
Very few surprisingly IMO, compared to Arrested Development for example (both brilliant)
27
dutymakesmelaugh 5 days ago +21
what from AD, apart from maybe the Rita storyline, hasn’t aged well? I feel like when your comedy derives from your characters being awful people it helps the aging process
21
Ozymandias200 5 days ago +7
I feel like some of the jokes in Amigos! didn’t age well.
7
mochianpanmatcha 5 days ago +8
The smash-cut to Tobias' business card declaring him as an "Analyst-Therapist," is the hardest I've ever laughed, at anything on tv EVER. Had chest pains and couldn't breathe properly for a good 10 minutes from the laughter and that's a darrrrrrrk joke. AD is just so well done tho!
8
vinsanity406 5 days ago +12
Mr F. Is really the only one that comes my mind
12
_Lappelduviide 5 days ago +11
“That was retar- *misguided*.”
11
SomewhereNo8378 5 days ago +10
same with Friends, Seinfeld, HIMYM, the office, and on. and these are just the “modern” sitcoms. 
10
RevolutionaryGain823 5 days ago +11
Even the office (which was pretty mainstream and inoffensive especially after the 1st few seasons) has had multiple episodes dropped from channels and streaming platforms and other episodes have had scenes cut (1 where Michael pretends to hang himself): https://www.nme.com/news/tv/the-office-controversial-episode-omitted-in-comedy-central-marathon-3035612 https://www.listnook.com/r/DunderMifflin/s/zPhkkLg840
11
IAmKenough2100 5 days ago +19
I *feel* that comedy made in, let’s say, early 2000’s should represent the era. It shouldn’t be walked back. Now a days you can put a disclaimer on it, but it’s made for its era.
19
Not_Cleaver 5 days ago +16
Like which ones?
16
Famous_Asparagus_314 5 days ago +15
I’m the same age as Tina & always admired her. 30 Rock & Kimmy Schmidt are all time favorites’. But I don’t think she’s sorry for or cares about making fun of what she made fun of. She HATES being made to feel bad about any joke she wrote or said out loud. I’ll never believe it when she says she’s sorry about a joke she wrote.
15
BombasticReindeer 5 days ago +39
This is so f****** tiresome.
39
mtnman575 5 days ago +4
Pretty weak article with virtually no detail.
4
vherbalbeats 5 days ago +4
In the spirit of Tina fey/30 rock/ted lasso topics I've seen here...I think the question people should be asking is would ted lasso had even taken that job coaching soccer overseas after his rv trip with Jennifer Anniston if Liz lemon moved to Cleveland with him? Lol
4
BrownBannister 5 days ago +5
She had a lot of shitheads on 30 Rock.
5
Empty-Way-6980 5 days ago +17
Jfc stop apologizing
17
ComposerParking4725 5 days ago +9
She’s had some questionable jokes about Asian women in many of her series.
9
blankdreamer 5 days ago +11
Isn’t there still room for us to laugh at ourselves? Everything is becoming so po faced
11
mcbeardsauce 5 days ago +15
Please don’t walk back comedy.
15
Distinct-Hat-5656 5 days ago +22
Don't apologize for jokes
22
BuzzkillMcGillicuddy 5 days ago +7
Don't double down when wrong
7
Rage-With-Me 5 days ago +3
Comedy has always “toed the line” it’s good to grow as a person
3
hazbutler 5 days ago +3
Watching 30 rock through again right now. While 90% of it is funny shit, there are a few jokes where I’m like, oof.
3
Fattapple 5 days ago +3
SNL is supposed to toe the line, obviously as the line moves some stuff will be across it.
3
Much_Lingonberry_37 5 days ago +6
Tina Fey is bread in Filipino.
6
sihouette9310 5 days ago +4
I don’t know what she means by “on the wrong side” the article doesn’t give any example as to what she or others might see as problematic. Or just whatever the f*** it means.
4
DC-Toronto 5 days ago +4
One of the great things about SNL is that it pushes boundaries and sometimes crosses the lines.
4
BillianForsee94 5 days ago +9
Not really true honestly. I think comedy was in the right spot 10-20 years ago. There’s a bit too much sensitivity now that should honestly be ignored.
9
taylorpilot 5 days ago +2
Someone’s trying to clean up a lot so the Lorne movie lands better
2
azmodan72 5 days ago +2
Someone needed to play Sarah Palin.
2
Malvionas 5 days ago +2
Better late than never I guess
2
Meloenbolletjeslepel 4 days ago +2
Wow that article is badly written
2
OrdinaryNo3622 5 days ago +4
You do better when you know better and you apologize if you’ve hurt someone.
4
86hawkeye 5 days ago +2
This site is awful. So many ads that keep popping up when you try to scroll to the actual article
2
← Back to Board