They will end up selling that data to AI companies to make better fake profiles. And governments.
3504
thefunkybassistApr 24, 2026
+298
Fake profiles: for me but not for thee!
298
OMalleyOrOblivionApr 24, 2026
+521
Sam Altman who runs OpenAI already started a project called Worldcoin a few years ago that scanned peoples' eyes in exchange for crypto, and went around Africa ~~scamming~~ signing people up. Pretty gross.
https://www.npr.org/2023/08/18/1194791494/worldcoin-uses-silver-orbs-to-scan-peoples-eyeballs-in-exchange-for-crypto-token
521
softlaunchApr 24, 2026
+92
Wait Altman was involved in Worldcoin? That's wild. I remember that being a thing.
92
lord_xenu_69Apr 24, 2026
+39
He's still involved here, it's the same company. They just rebranded from Worldcoin -> World
39
TMToastApr 24, 2026
+66
The article linked in this post is saying that Tinder is partnering with World to provide this service right now, I guess you don’t need to sell them data when they are doing the scanning for you
66
Available-Guava932Apr 24, 2026
+7
I would 100% never use this service because 1) it's associated with cryptocurrency and 2) it's associated with Scam Altman, however:
It is worth mentioning that the concept behind World is actually good. First it is open source meaning in theory you can build your own iris scanner, and second it uses zero knowledge proof - as long as it is used correctly, neither companies nor governments nor the World organization can find out who you are, but nonetheless can still create a one-time proof that you are human.
7
nasnedigonyatApr 24, 2026
+14
It's pronounced Scam Altman
14
KataphractoiApr 24, 2026
+5
Clammy Scammy Altman.
5
nasnedigonyatApr 24, 2026
+2
The bones are his money
2
[deleted]Apr 24, 2026
+11
[removed]
11
OphioukhosUnboundApr 24, 2026
+29
“…to make better [harder to detect] fake governments.”
… yeah, that’s about right
29
physicskingApr 24, 2026
+18
So true. JFC
But it begs the question, on those platforms, what's the solution to prove humanity while not providing something to the AI companies that they can use?
Edit: insert finger for blood sample...
18
Spork_WarriorApr 24, 2026
+16
Three factor authentication is extra steps, but it works fairly well:
1) Something you are (bio).
2) Something you have (token).
3) Something you know (password)
16
wayoverpaidApr 24, 2026
+12
AI can know a password, at least I'm the sense of being able to use it.
Tokens online need to be converted to data somehow. My passkeys are virtual. A human can't know them, but a machine can.
So all that's left is the biomarkers, which again, needs to be converted to data to be useful online.
I like 3 factor to prove that I am who I say I am, sure. But proving I'm human at a distance is harder.
12
DillBagnerApr 24, 2026
+6
The usual. Meet in public places. Until we start getting convincing androids, it shouldn't be a problem. They are dating apps, right?
6
Reddit_Loves_MisinfoApr 24, 2026
+7
They are using a Sam Altman company for this verification
7
MolteninfernoApr 24, 2026
+7
now they can copy and paste retina maps and finger prints into their AI models so they can bypass any way to verfiy you are human online for the next decade
7
LaserGuidedPolarBearApr 24, 2026
+4
Exactly right. If Tinder got rid of bots it would go out of business. This is not about bots, it is about capturing biometric data.
4
TyboldApr 24, 2026
+3
Idk, it's gonna be hard to beat the fake government we have now.
3
KittenPicsApr 24, 2026
+2
Hahaha, I meant sell the data to governments, but I like what you did there!
2
WakandamnationApr 24, 2026
+3
Some day not so far we will pay our groceries and everything with eyes and hands scans. That might not end well for some of us.
3
FIContractorApr 24, 2026
+3
They don’t need to sell it, the company they hired to do the verification is confounded by Sam Altman.
3
knightress_oxhideApr 24, 2026
+2
Real Fake Profiles!
2
Banned3rdTimesaCharmApr 24, 2026
+2
Yea they just want your biometric data.
2
Sad-Excitement9295Apr 24, 2026
+2
Fake profiles? Probably, but I bet there's already a deal to sell it for public tracking by the government.
2
KittenPicsApr 24, 2026
+2
Oh for sure. Really, my point was just that they will sell your data to anyone that wants to pay for it.
2
Sad-Excitement9295Apr 25, 2026
+2
Yeah, I was just verifying your point lol
Of course they would roll this out on Tinder first to early test it and make it look popular.
2
mindfulmuApr 24, 2026
+865
I wouldn't scan shit for any reason
865
obeytheturtlesApr 24, 2026
+434
I do wonder in like 20 years if I will be that disheveled guy hanging out at the bus station yelling at people about the unholy technofascist beast, unable to access any of my money, get a job, or buy a home, because I refuse to participate in identity verification fascism.
"I USED TO BE AN ENGINEER! THEY WILL COME FOR YOU NEXT!"
434
mindfulmuApr 24, 2026
+90
I may join you, will wrap our gentials in aluminum foil and lick our lips too much during rants.
90
LoquaciousMendaciousApr 24, 2026
+37
That makes three of us. I barely know anyone besides myself who hasn't given their fingerprint or Face ID over to their phone. A crinkly foil condom sounds kinda nice, NGL.
37
SpeedyTurboApr 24, 2026
+3
That's just called being dumb at this point
3
phileatApr 24, 2026
+3
To be fair, and I know how ironic replying is, FaceTime is quite secure and private. Your phone has the data but Apple does not.
Edit: FaceID
3
LoquaciousMendaciousApr 24, 2026
+4
That could be the case, and I'll admit it's somewhat hairsplitty since there are (few) public pictures of me out there on the internet that I don't control which I suppose could also be analyzed for facial recondition data. It's more the normalization of giving our biometrics over that I try to oppose.
4
UntimelyGhostTicklerApr 24, 2026
+15
Welcome to blackmirror. That episode where people swap their eyes for cameras comes to mind as it leads to the ones not doing it being seen as untrustworthy xD
15
LARPeratorApr 24, 2026
+9
Just don't forget to rant about the techno-necromancers from alpha centauri
9
Cumdump90001Apr 24, 2026
+3
Don’t worry, you won’t be. They won’t allow such behavior. They’ll put you in prison or simply “get rid of you” so you can’t criticize them.
3
Bitter_Librarian8442Apr 24, 2026
+2
Last week I got the "age verification check" here on listnook, and my initial reaction was "well it's been fun, cya later."
I'd recently deleted my main account anyway and was moving away from spending so much time on it.
But jumping on a day or two ago to check the news and I noticed I'm allowed back on this account.
But I'll go bush before giving them me eyeballs.
2
PacificTSPApr 24, 2026
+77
Unfortunately it’s everywhere now. Business Facebook accounts are requiring video of your face. Going through the airport yesterday no passport was required just walk up to the terminal and it scans your face.
77
mindfulmuApr 24, 2026
+31
I'd assume they wouldn't use my 'i have to lift a buttcheek to slide out a fart without shitting myself' face.
31
yzerman88Apr 24, 2026
+2
Left cheek? Or right
2
mindfulmuApr 24, 2026
+8
For the sake of the hypothetical I usually lift my right buttcheek up, mostly because my wallet is in my left side.
But now im wondering if my butt has a dominat side.
8
dirty_hookerApr 24, 2026
+8
Yo. Stop wearing your wallet in a cheek pocket unless you remove it to sit. It wrecks your back to sit like that.
8
mindfulmuApr 24, 2026
+3
At some point I'm just going to get a fanny pack and be done with it.
3
Zealousideal-Gap964Apr 24, 2026
+13
I always opt out of the face scan, it’s not necessary. And you don’t need passport for domestic flights in the US
13
Koala_eiOApr 24, 2026
+38
> And you don’t need passport for domestic flights in the US
There are a few other countries in the world.
38
PeripatetictylApr 24, 2026
+7
Yea? Name ~194 others?!
7
PacificTSPApr 24, 2026
+11
I fly internationally quite a bit. I’m everywhere at this point. I don’t even use my Facebook account I don’t have it on my phone but it still requires verification
11
Strange_Drive_6598Apr 24, 2026
+24
Not even for a hot Latina?
24
Jesus_Is_My_GardenerApr 24, 2026
+31
Depends, are they in my area now?
31
irealllylovepenguinsApr 24, 2026
+3
Depends how many pages she needs i guess. If she wants duplex that's extra.
3
obeytheturtlesApr 24, 2026
+3
What size b**** are we talking?
3
mindfulmuApr 24, 2026
+4
A half Brazilian half Japanese, parts model whos already oiled up for a photo shoot wouldnt convince me to scan a knee for her.
4
MutaitoSenseiApr 24, 2026
+6
Yeah, at this point it's almost a rallying cry
I AIN'T SCANNING SHIT
6
NorwegianSpaniardApr 24, 2026
+2
Like with captchas, at this point we are little more than just free training material providers to these corporations, I mean, other than squeezing our wallets dry too.
2
Wire_Cath_Needle_DocApr 24, 2026
+2
What about piss?
2
BarnezhiltonApr 24, 2026
+2
Take that, barcodes on grocery products!
2
mindfulmuApr 24, 2026
+3
Those are ok, I only scan those before I own them. But once I own them, no more scanning!
3
LehmanPartyApr 24, 2026
+2
I scanned them once and there were aliens living in there
2
JoshSimiliApr 24, 2026
+267
It might prove they're human but will it prove they're the person in (most of) the profile photos?
Otherwise this is just verifying that you're being scammed by a human being instead of artificial intelligence.
267
AYASOFAYAApr 24, 2026
+91
It does scan for that. I saw someone talking about this online so grain of salt:
The AI catfishers are trying to get around this by adding one weird photo at the end that looks like a strange painting but does have the eyes of the human behind the catfish, enough to satisfy the scanner even though the rest of the photos are fake.
91
IntelArtiGenApr 24, 2026
+56
It's funny the amount of engineering they put to do the verification and how easy it's circumvented
56
gaflarApr 24, 2026
+53
[Here's a source](https://youtu.be/rjxAYdUe8uU?si=Rae2w3ai7_QtGcT6)
It's not just eyes, the scammer is straight up AI-slopping their own face onto a random image and using it to get verified. Which means if you find one of these profiles, the last photo will be the face of the guy trying to scam you (potentially on Ariana Grande's body on a billboard) which is pretty creepy.
Also it doubles as a filter for people who won't fall for the scam - if you ask them about the weird photo, they know you're not a good target.
53
coldwildfl0wersApr 24, 2026
+10
Lol I was looking for the link to this video to post here too, glad someone beat me to it.
10
SlaveToBuyApr 24, 2026
+11
This scan thing is complete bullshit it's just to pull data from their userbase and then most likely sell it. People who are running massive bot farms on the platform will always find ways around it. They always have.
11
GreatStateOfSadnessApr 24, 2026
+2
It's also part of a new feature that tells potential matches which of the five people in each of your photos you are instead of making them guess by swiping through six different crowd photos to try to figure it out.
2
toukayeahApr 24, 2026
+133
What level of dystopian nightmare is this?
133
HugsandHateApr 24, 2026
+50
The highest it's reached.
*^(So far.)*
50
VrylyApr 24, 2026
+3
Pk d*** level I think.
3
Hackwork89Apr 24, 2026
+6
We're just getting started, baby. We haven't even passed the tutorial level yet, and there are 99 levels.
6
Informal_Project_327Apr 24, 2026
+113
Nice way to steal biometric data.
113
TimelymannerApr 24, 2026
+19
Seems like the only winning move is for people to delete their Tinder profile and uninstall the app.
19
O_PLUTO_OApr 24, 2026
+10
I don’t think the average citizen is informed enough about data management and biometrics to be able to give consent to these corps for their data. We shouldn’t have an opt-out culture of data collection or even allow consent from users to have their data collected. It’s a government’s responsibility to protect its horribly naive and ignorant citizens but unfortunately it’s just taken advantage of
10
TimelymannerApr 24, 2026
+5
I agree with you, but the tech bros are the new robber barons. They have there hands all over most government legislation.
It also doesn’t help that most politicians who should be making laws to regulate new technology, are out of touch geriatrics.
So I see where all of this is currently at, and where it’s going and I have zero hope.
5
OopsAIIBotsApr 24, 2026
+3
I imagine that everyone who has had a phone with a camera in it anytime since the Snowden leaks already has theirs in a govt file somewhere.
3
Lopsided-Weather6469Apr 24, 2026
+117
They should do a full Voight-Kampff test
117
iHawXxApr 24, 2026
+39
"Do you long for having your heart interlinked? Interlinked."
They wouldn't have to change a thing.
39
NarrMasterApr 24, 2026
+15
Cells.
15
NosrokApr 25, 2026
+4
Interlinked
4
Drafo7Apr 24, 2026
+11
Never read/seen Blade Runner so had no idea what this was. Stumbled upon this gem on the wikipedia article:
>In real life, a magazine created an approximation of the test using questions and used it in jest on the candidates in the 2003 election for Mayor of San Francisco, concluding that at least half of them, including future Governor Gavin Newsom, would be classified as replicants.[69][70]
11
Lopsided-Weather6469Apr 24, 2026
+8
>Never read/seen Blade Runner
Bro you're missing out. You need to watch Blade Runner.
You can't read Blade Runner though since the book the movie is based on isn't called Blade Runner but "Do Robots Dream of Electric Sheep?" and it's somewhat different from the film. Both are masterpieces in their own right but have a very different philosophical focus.
8
Jesus_Is_My_GardenerApr 24, 2026
+10
Describe in single words, only the good things that come into your mind about your mother.
10
totallyRebbApr 24, 2026
+7
Let me tell you about my mother 💦🔫
7
IntelArtiGenApr 24, 2026
+4
I'm at a point where when a website blocks me for thinking I'm a bot, I use an LLM to see its content. I'm the bot, he's the human, I guess that's how it works now.
4
SemiHemiDemiDumbApr 24, 2026
+77
I'll do anything for love but I won't do that
77
SlaterVBenedictApr 24, 2026
+33
This is an interesting way to say “Tinder wants your personal biometric data for profit reasons.”
33
Blenderhead36Apr 24, 2026
+20
Saw a fascinating [YouTube video](https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rjxAYdUe8uU&t=932s&pp=ygUTVGluZGVyIHJvbWFuY2Ugc2NhbQ%3D%3D) about romance scammers on Tinder.
OP's buddy mentions that they keep matching with profiles that all conform to a weirdly similar pattern: attractive Caucasian male in his late 30s to early 40s, looking for a long term relationship, sporting a profile that seems very authentic, Verified badge, and the last photo on their profile is a piece of art that's been edited to incorporate the face of an Asian person. The art was always different, sometimes a painting, sometimes a sculpture, sometimes an oddly cropped billboard.
Tinder has the option to take a short video of your face, which their algorithm will then compare to your profile pictures and grant your profile a Verified badge if the video and one of the pictures match.
What OP determined was that these profiles were being operated by romance scammers in East Asia, who'd quickly try to move the conversation to WhatsApp and start talking about crypto. The photos were real, but not made by the person operating the profile; he was able to reverse image search the real Facebook and Instagram accounts they'd been taken from. That last photo was the scammer's real face and where the Verified badge was coming from (you only need 1 picture to match to get the badge), disguised in different pieces of art to make the pattern harder to spot. If the person messaging them mentioned that photo, they'd change the subject, and if they kept asking about it, they'd know that this one isn't a mark and stop messaging/block them.
20
____DEADPOOL_______Apr 24, 2026
+10
I saw this video too a day or two ago and am definitely sure that Tinder got so embarrassed by his reporting that they enabled this feature to save face. Now, it's going to cost them thousands of dollars in having to scrub all the fake profiles out there and they want to avoid that for sure. It was their cost cutting that made it so only one photo would be scanned.
10
permalink_saveApr 24, 2026
+4
What worries me is if they're doing it it's because it works, so who is getting catfished on tinder, sent to whatsapp, only for it to be spam about crypto, then saying sure, that actually sounds great sign me up. Because it had to have happened a few times.
4
SamyMerchiApr 24, 2026
+40
Would probably fail.
40
LaDmEaApr 24, 2026
+5
My eyes are black(the technical color assigned by my contact manufacturer) as night so probably yeah.
5
Loki-LApr 24, 2026
+15
I have seen enough movies to know how this ends.
Soon we will enter the eyeball harvesting to fuel the botfarm stage.
15
i_sell_you_liesApr 24, 2026
+3
And i'm over here just growing eyes in a petri dish
3
AngreekApr 24, 2026
+33
I’ve tried to do this, it’s wildly inaccurate and will just block you anyways. Even if you take the same exact picture/scan.. it ‘doesn’t recognize’
It’s a flagrant biometric accumulation gathering. Has nothing to do w verification.
33
redditscraperbot2Apr 24, 2026
+35
I’m so glad I’m married with kids at this point. Modern dating sounds like a kafkaesque nightmare.
35
Jim_ChaosApr 24, 2026
+7
I'm surprised to read people are still using Tinder. I would never trade again my sad but somewhat peaceful loneliness for that straight from hell app.
7
UnacceptableUseApr 24, 2026
+11
> World, the identity verification project co-founded by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman
Hey isn't that funny
11
dropdanApr 24, 2026
+7
Nice, they are taking action against AI by making it easier for actual users to finally choose to ditch the platform.
7
Reznik81Apr 24, 2026
+16
Sad. Then you have only matches left that don't reply. Say what you will against scammers and bots - at least they reply. XD
16
i_sell_you_liesApr 24, 2026
+2
Hey baby, I gotchu 😘
I love your green icon ❤️
Now that ur hooked on me, my love language is s*** hot crypto talk...
2
VTArxelusApr 24, 2026
+6
How about you just delete the suspected profiles instead?
6
DaymDApr 24, 2026
+5
Of course, you know for sure that they won't be selling these pictures and that this wasn't the original goal. Definitely...
5
Ripped_AllelesApr 24, 2026
+6
Tinder literally employs bot accounts, this is an excuse to collect and sell biometric user data.
I sincerely hope people are smart enough to realize how dangerous this is to consent to.
6
sh0tgunbenApr 24, 2026
+7
Too many pretenders in dating app
7
AyrtonomousApr 24, 2026
+4
Theres no proof of humanity in these dead empty eyes.
4
lostanApr 24, 2026
+3
pretty glad im not dating.
3
Wise-Treat-Apr 24, 2026
+3
Not to steal data, of course /s
3
sftpoApr 24, 2026
+3
can't wait until the first person with military clearance uploads most of their biometrics to the app
3
try_repeat_succeedApr 24, 2026
+7
Tinder is surveillance tech. Simple as that. This is just an excuse to get users to give up their biometric data. Go meet someone organically.
7
redpandafireApr 24, 2026
+6
It’s common sense but don’t scan anything and upload. Don’t upload n****. Just stop trusting these companies who will sell your data, then turn around and blame you for it.
They’re honestly needs to be an online privacy literacy course for every child.
6
PiperPeriwinkleApr 24, 2026
+6
> by making users scan eyes for “proof of humanity"
Finally theyve figured a way to keep my ex off
6
ThemodsarecuntzApr 24, 2026
+3
Rejected: Users eyes are dead inside
3
WhiteHeatBlackLightApr 24, 2026
+3
Same technique I use in public. Can confirm eyes are mostly dead
3
rcanhestroApr 24, 2026
+3
tbf, either way it's shit.
either you verify yourself with some "concerning data harvesting" method, or you accept that the ecosystem is filled with bots.
even though many of these companies aren't to be trusted with your data, people still complain about bots (here on Listnook as well), but if someone suggest any sort of ID verification people scream "but my privacy!!".
you can't have your cake and eat it too.
one has to give, either people accept verification systems, or they accept the bots.
3
Panda-MaximusApr 24, 2026
+3
Like you can't fake that too.
3
baylitheApr 24, 2026
+3
Back in 2024 when I was single I remember Tinder being full of bots. Can't imagine how bad it is now.
3
imnotlovelyApr 24, 2026
+3
I wonder if I could scan my dog's eyes for this 🤔
3
YanceyGlennApr 24, 2026
+3
I scan my eyes nervously. This is my fifteenth attempt. "No proof of humanity found" flashes in red across the screen. I begin to cry.
3
EwetuberApr 24, 2026
+3
I wonder when we'll finally reach the point that people will stop all this 'give them all your money and data' shit to the point that we talk to each other and find relationships in person again.
3
ftgyhujikolpApr 24, 2026
+5
Eyes and mouths (especially while speaking naturally) are where AI still struggles. There's also a lot of lighting problems and resolution mixing between elements in images but those are harder to detect with an algorithm accurately.
5
steelcryoApr 24, 2026
+5
Which is why they want people to scan them. Lots of AI training data to sell. This is a company that has monetised people's loneliness. I wouldn't trust them for a second.
5
DofoloApr 24, 2026
+5
Funnily enough, AI is very good at detecting if an image is AI modifed.
5
adamhighdefApr 24, 2026
+3
If it's from Gemini they encode data that survives cropping at the pixel level (its colour), likely similar done by other AI vendors to prevent training on AI generated content + trace bad stuff.
3
shamberraApr 24, 2026
+2
Would this "encoded data" survive resizing the image (particularly shrinking) or being saved as a different format (like .bmp to .jpg)
2
IntelArtiGenApr 24, 2026
+2
It really depends on many things, they thought about that obviously but if you distort the image enough clearly it won't work: https://deepmind.google/models/synthid/, they say:
> designed to stand up to modifications like cropping, adding filters, changing frame rates, or lossy compression.
There are many ways to circumvent this watermark, it's just a small protection, probably better than nothing.
2
obeytheturtlesApr 24, 2026
+2
Yes, probably. Modern "dumb" image hashing techniques already use various kinds of patched hashes which will survive standard scaling, rotation and translation. It follows that Google's fingerprinting system would be implemented to be at least as capable as these algorithms.
2
Loose_Skill6641Apr 24, 2026
+7
who still uses tinder lmao
7
IntelArtiGenApr 24, 2026
+3
I'm not sure the typical Listnook user is simultaneously the typical Tinder user, for reasons I refuse to disclose.
3
m15f1tApr 24, 2026
+2
That'll be a huge target for hackers and criminal organizations. Eye scans. Jummy.
2
Short_Switch_1807Apr 24, 2026
+2
What if we just all pretended this was 2009 and go back to WoW instead of social media...
2
f0rgottenApr 24, 2026
+2
This right here is why I have not used any dating apps, despite my post divorce loneliness.
2
ChildoftheApocolypseApr 24, 2026
+2
Scan for proof of humanity? On a dating app? 😂 Ok, good luck with that..
2
NosferatattooApr 24, 2026
+2
Why do so many people just willingly do this stuff? I'm not even into criminal activities and know its not wise to give random companies your eyes scans, fingerprints, ID, face scan etc.
2
MarcusQuintusApr 24, 2026
+2
That they will no doubt use AI to filter and learn from.
2
totallyRebbApr 24, 2026
+2
We should require "proof of humanity" for so-called world- and tech-leaders instead.
2
O-parkerApr 24, 2026
+2
Dump them ..it’s a crappy site
2
IunlachtApr 24, 2026
+2
Dark Souls ass request. There better be a magic wall opening after that.
2
JMDeutschApr 24, 2026
+2
LMFAO.
This is like giving blood to drive a [Ford Pinto](https://www.autosafety.org/ford-pinto-fuel-tank/)
2
busty_snacklefordApr 24, 2026
+2
There’s no way I’d ever send a high res shot of my irises to a f****** dating app, what a nightmare lmao.
2
libruaryApr 24, 2026
+2
Add to the reasons to not use Tinder
2
warrant2kApr 24, 2026
+2
Iris patterns are one of the last secure biometric methods. But now I suppose even that can be duped.
2
TjbMkeApr 24, 2026
+2
Tinder is trash and a lost cause. They should just give up.
2
Confident_DragonApr 24, 2026
+2
Have you ever seen profiles with one of the images being some AI generated artwork with modified face? Scammers use that one for face verification (using their real face), rest of the images are stolen and not related to the scammer.
Tinder is so terrible with their security, and now they want scans of eyes? They should fix the basics and what they already have implemented instead of trying to gather more data about users.
2
jaybanziaApr 24, 2026
+2
yeah dont give a dating app your retina scan.
2
cracquelatureApr 25, 2026
+2
And then I will pay them 200 billion dollars for all of your eyes and feed it into my AI model, thus destroying this security concept 4 eva. Same old song and dance
2
Doctor_FritzApr 24, 2026
+6
Tinder is the biggest pile of shit there is. Used to be a customer until they banned my account out of nowhere. No option to appeal and talk to a person, no real reason given, just a vague message about breaking rules.
Tinder can go put itself where the sun doesn't shine
6
seventysevensevensApr 24, 2026
+3
I really hope people make an effort to meet people in person like in the old days.
Scanning your face in to this shut us not worth it.
3
LostInAPortalApr 24, 2026
+4
That era is long gone. Most people meet online these days, third spaces are no longer considered avenues for dating
4
Choice_Past7399Apr 24, 2026
+3
It's talking about World ID.
You scan your iris with infrared light at an orb.
It's one of the only private identification systems there are.
People freak out, yet, people don't mind scanning their faces every day (taking selfies) to help Google track them and train their AI systems.
3
permalink_saveApr 24, 2026
+3
Remember when people got pissed off about NSA. I said it during snowden, people pissed at the gov yet leave their phone on streaming their private messages and location to a corporation. This shit keeps getting normalized and all it takes is a corp making a flashy feature that "needs" data.
3
santathe1Apr 24, 2026
+2
Probably got a couple of eyes in the freezer I could use.
2
santathe1Apr 24, 2026
+2
Ice…I meant ice in the freezer.
2
sioux612Apr 24, 2026
+2
Thank god I'm done with dating apps
It genuinely feels like some of the larger companies work together to make bots as hard to recognize as possible.
In the past you could just reverse image search pictures of people that looked fishy. Nowadays google will tell you that it can't do that. Good chance you couldn't reverse image search the mona lisa anymore due to privacy concerns.
2
DemosthenesOrNahApr 24, 2026
+2
Persistent attestation is NOT solved, and any company or service claiming they can ID the end user is straight up lying and scamming you for biometrics and pii.
The big tech companies all know this, and everyone in the space knows who ever solves it will instantly ++ about a trillion dollars in valuation
2
imminentjogger5Apr 24, 2026
+2
people still use Tinder?
2
vagabond251Apr 24, 2026
+1
Most humans don't have enough humanity for this.
1
Evil_EgApr 24, 2026
+1
How to train AI to create fake iris images (annotated)
1
Bayo77Apr 24, 2026
+1
Datingapps already had that test where you have to upload a photo holding a Text or something to verify your not a fake profile.
1
timify10Apr 24, 2026
+1
AI, fakes eyes... Easy
1
FanOfFreshAirApr 24, 2026
+1
Mr. Beast would be denied.
1
Boys4EverApr 24, 2026
+1
Who's looking at eyes on Tinder 🤔
1
xX609s-hartXxApr 24, 2026
+1
So it will be completely empty for free users? I tried it once for a couple of months, then tried again years later and there still were the same profiles with the same photos.
1
BallBearingBillApr 24, 2026
+1
How about doing it for every pic an not just for an identity pic masked into a profile?
1
JaradcelApr 24, 2026
+1
Err wasn't World some scammy-seeming Blockchain shady tech company giving you 50 bucks if you joined up and scanned your iris? What happened when I blinked?
1
GrahamCawthorneApr 24, 2026
+1
We should do that with our elected officials
1
Xano74Apr 24, 2026
+1
Oddly enough this scan did not work on Jeff Bezos and Mark Zuckerberg
1
seanBLAMMOApr 24, 2026
+1
They should use the same system for the presidency
1
Shootforthestars24Apr 24, 2026
+1
People still use tinder? Lol
1
Logical_Net6108Apr 24, 2026
+1
How many false negatives will they find for people lacking light in their eyes on tinder
1
anunnaki_marauderApr 24, 2026
+1
80% dudes
1
bestestopinionApr 24, 2026
+1
The eyes is where the innocence is
1
Far-Maintenance-1947Apr 24, 2026
+1
Don't fall for this. Match Group (Tinder's/Hinge's owner) are a genuinely evil company and will sell your biometrics away.
1
ragingfeminineflowerApr 24, 2026
+1
So… give a dating app a retinal scan…?
Hahahaha NO.
1
EntertainerOk9179Apr 24, 2026
+1
And yet you let me take the first few rides every day before you verify that I am the person I say I am...
1
TheGreatGabe1Apr 24, 2026
+1
What if you don’t have eyes?
1
BasketseeksdogApr 24, 2026
+1
So first it was the finger ID, then it was Face ID, and now they want Iris ID. Eventually all that data is going to be in the hands of the highest bidder
1
ToolTimeTApr 24, 2026
+1
Because O******* with real humans is proof of humanity?
1
ComfortableExotic646Apr 24, 2026
+1
Dexerto on World News. Lads, this might be the biggest sign possible that listnook is done.
1
Xzentrix07Apr 24, 2026
+1
thisthe kind of thing that which happens when you entrust the machine to pave your path to an everlasting relationship or friendship
1
CrisisActor911Apr 24, 2026
+1
The unintended upside being no more MAGA Republicans will be able to access the app 👀
1
CiderbatApr 24, 2026
+1
Voight-Kampff test for the horny
1
Desert-NoirApr 24, 2026
+1
this isn’t fair, horny dudes will do anything and aren’t thinking straight in that state.
1
jcphamApr 24, 2026
+1
Better give me some dang worldcoin for scanning my eyeballs there Altman. The grift that keeps on grifting
1
negativeyodaApr 24, 2026
+1
I am so happy I'm not on the apps anymore
1
bigexpl0sionApr 25, 2026
+1
Too little too late. The app is fundamentally broken
1
ApstinenceSucks8Apr 25, 2026
+1
The Internet v2 is going to be a filtered instance of apps and services only available to those who can prove to be humans. Many different ways of authorization will exist, from government IDs, personal hardware IDs, facial or retinal scans, fingerprints, location based etc.
Essentially Internet v2 is going to be such that every non automated entity on it needs to be a human. Certain bots and macros might be allowed for specific tasks but only through legal entities that will be responsible for its operation.
Now that does not mean that such Internet wont have privacy and that governments will be able to spy upon citizens.
The current internet as we know it will be 99.9% AI bots trying to mimic human interaction and scam people.
Humans will eventually move from v1 into v2. The bots in v1 will exist in some sort of perpetual limbo scamming themselves and scraping the data that they think is real but is generated data from other bots.
At some point servers running those bots will realize v1 is no longer profitable and will switch bots off.
v2 Internet will have heavy penalties for humans who attempt to introduce AI into it. Penalties such as permanent banishment from v2.
Humans will at some point use cybernetic implants that will merge AI functions with them.
This is how Internet v3 gets made, to separate true humans against humans contaminated with AI neural interfaces.
v4 Internet is something beyond my current imagination.
I might take shrooms next week and will report if I figure out what v4 is going to be.
1
LivingEnd44Apr 25, 2026
+1
LOL, this is going to be entertaining. I can tell.
1
jormugandrApr 25, 2026
+1
Wouldn't it be obvious when they don't show up for your date?
1
Anybody220Apr 25, 2026
+1
I got on Tinder about 2 months ago. After a week, I had 100+ likes, and every day I would swipe over and over. How many matches did I have after 2 months?
Zero, none, nada, zilch. I deleted it last week.
1
AWiseCrowApr 25, 2026
+1
Do we have any Humanity left
1
Helpful-Aioli-7882Apr 25, 2026
+1
they're the ones that use fake AI profiles on its users to get $$$ anyways...
192 Comments