Well when I think of TMZ, I envision that iconic 2006 photo of Britney Spears, Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan in a car.
225
Aggravating_Life7851Apr 25, 2026
+64
Do you remember it being referred to as The Bimbo Summit? Wild times
64
AMediaArchivistApr 25, 2026
+25
I remember the word fire crotch. I don’t remember who coined the term but I saw it on TMZ in the 2000s and it referred to Lindsay Lohan
25
funkympcApr 25, 2026
+39
"Fire crotch" has been an insult for as long as I can remember. Certainly predating TMZ by many years. I heard it for first time in middle school in the 90s.
39
SumpCrabApr 25, 2026
+13
Yeah, I have a few gingers in my family, firecrotch was around way before this.
13
jediracerApr 25, 2026
+5
Insult?
5
SomeCountryFriedBSApr 25, 2026
+1
More like "lewd slang"
1
K_LinkmasterApr 25, 2026
+1
Insult is hilarious. I hear fire crotch and it's damn near a mating call! Redheads rule! Make more! Their physiology is fascinating as well in that they have a higher pain tolerance. That makes warriors.
1
Self-ComprehensiveApr 25, 2026
+1
It's not an insult.
1
funkympcApr 25, 2026
+1
If i had red hair and was called fire crotch I would be personally insulted and would probably punch the person called me that.
That and that pic of Rihanna they published without her consent.
1
pocketjacksApr 25, 2026
+1
The first time I noticed TMZ was Michael Richards' freakout on stage where he was shouting the N word.
1
MaestroLogicalApr 25, 2026
+156
I would be all for this if it resulted in actual consequences for politicians.
As it stands, all it will do is further cement the 'politics as trashy entertainment' nature of our current zeitgeist and I can't see that being a good thing.
156
mollybolly12Apr 25, 2026
+49
Look up Tony Gonzalez, Eric swalwell, and Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick. Cory Mills is in the hot seat.
We all get the chance to show politicians actual consequences in November so TMZ has picked the perfect time to provide additional information to voters.
49
RollTh3MapsApr 25, 2026
+1
The only reason Gonzalez faced consequences is because Swalwell stepped down and the Republicans were ok with losing a vote if the Democrats did too.
1
mollybolly12Apr 25, 2026
+1
Yes, and? None of those three people should be in office. And Cory Mills is still absolutely on the clock. We got two predators and someone who abused campaign finance laws out of office in the course of a couple weeks. Celebrate the wins people, they’re few and far between right now. Pick yourselves up and take advantage of every piece of information you can get.
1
ThunkAsDrinklePeepApr 25, 2026
+1
> We all get the chance to show politicians actual consequences in November
[Looks at gerrymandered districts, and a lack of ranked choice or party seats.] Do we though?
1
mollybolly12Apr 25, 2026
+1
So gerrymandering prevents you from getting a sexual predator out of office? Or what are you saying? Three people resigned, and one more is likely on the clock due to public pressure from reporting on highly unethical/criminal/abusive behavior.
Things are far from perfect, but writing off the impact of your vote and your voice is just giving up.
By the way, Democrats have consistently pushed for nationwide bans on gerrymandering and VA and CA’s maps are temporary. Ranked choice has not been a nationwide reality but it’s possible in the future. There are very real cracks in the foundation of institutional democrats. We can affect change now more than ever.
1
ThunkAsDrinklePeepApr 25, 2026
+1
I vote. And there are wins. But we're playing at a c***** where the house has rigged the games. They overwhelmingly are winning and will continue to do so unless we make systemic changes.
1
mollybolly12Apr 25, 2026
+1
Ok what’s systemic changes are you currently working on?
1
notapoliticalaltApr 25, 2026
+11
This. There is something to be said for TMZ not necessarily adhering to typical Washtingon standards and culture, but at the end of the day, I think they will only make things even trashier.
11
illuminerdiApr 25, 2026
+6
> I think they will only make things even trashier
We both know this isn't remotely possibly for as long as Mango Mussolini is in the white house
6
Master_Art_1286Apr 25, 2026
+1
We’ve been there before during reconstruction/Gilded Age. Being in politics wasn’t a respectable thing back then
1
ImAnOptimistISwearApr 25, 2026
+1
sometimes you have to meet people where they are educate from there
1
Chrono_ConvoyApr 25, 2026
+141
Yea please sick the Papparazioli’s on Politicians
They need to be exposed
141
HuntguyApr 25, 2026
+30
Honestly. May as well stick the scum to the scum.
30
Witty-Stand888Apr 25, 2026
+64
I gotta admit they usually get the story before everyone else.
64
PalpitationNo3106Apr 25, 2026
+22
They pay more. If you had a photo of something scandalous, would you give it to the billionaire who owns the Post or the Times, or sell it to TMZ?
22
MedialunchApr 25, 2026
+5
Why not the billionaire?
5
HolmesdaleApr 25, 2026
+23
a) they're c****; and
b) there is a long history of catch and kill played by billionaires with political views
23
19snow16Apr 25, 2026
+5
TMZ isn't above catch, kill and, use that info for blackmail.
5
MedialunchApr 25, 2026
+2
But the comment made it sound like the party that wasn’t the billionaire pays more. As if we should all assume the same.
2
RollTh3MapsApr 25, 2026
+1
They said “give” it to the billionaire or “sell” it to TMZ.
1
godzillas_zillaApr 25, 2026
+1
Because reputable journalists wouldn’t pay for the picture/information. TMZ will so they usually get info first.
1
PalpitationNo3106Apr 25, 2026
+3
They won’t pay you.
3
DeekALeekApr 25, 2026
+47
TMZ is owned by Fox Corporation, which is owned by Rupert Murdoch. I am not sure what is the motive here.
Is this a crafty “divide & conquer” and “controlled opposition” tactic to keep MAGA and Rupert in power? Perhaps Rupert finally wants Donny to leave office because he’s pissed-off about something, so now he’s sending his TMZ mercenaries to further pressure MAGA congressmen and administration to do something about Donny by gathering kompromat on everyone? Maybe both, and/or something else?
We’re in psychotic times, no doubt. We even saw a day when ‘Infowars’ was taken over by ‘The Onion’ with Tim Heidecker as their new face. So maybe this is a good thing. However, the fact that TMZ are in Washington DC doing these “scoops” is yet-another example of how the current 4th Estate is failing the People (purposely or otherwise, because most major media outlets are owned by pro-MAGA bajilionaires).
::EDIT TO ADD:: Well *NO DUH* the motive is about the money. My question is how much leverage Rupert Murdoch is looking to gain over Trump and/or the next guy taking over as POTUS, and whether this may be a sign of a squabble between Rupert and some other oligarch jostling for supreme media influence.
Mind you: Jeff Bezos owns the Washington Post and AWS, and he chose to kiss the ring. But Disney chose to bring back Jimmy Kimmel after Trump’s FCC canceled him and saw ‘Streisand Effect’ higher ratings. So there are two main ways to get more money out of this administration: kiss the ring, or hit back with much larger crowd support.
47
Subliminal_KiddoApr 25, 2026
+28
Harvey's contract stipulated he would remain in control of TMZ and have editorial freedom. It's generally believed that Fox will keep that in place when his 5-year-contract is up for negotiations because he's too good at running the enterprise.
The Murdoch's prioritize money, they don't care if they come off as hypocritical or even monstrous\*. The Wall Street Journal has been criticizing Trump for years. One could argue Murdoch uses the Mac strategy of pitting his publications against one another and playing both sides so he always comes out on top.
\*Look into their UK tabloid The Sun. They used to run a feature called The Page 3 Girl, which was a topless photo of a model printed on Page 3. For decades, there was a loophole in British law that allowed girls as young as 16 to pose. They would even feature a little box with photos of the models at 15 in bikinis with a countdown until the number of days she'd be old enough for them to publish the topless photos. It's insane.
ETA: And if you want a good laugh. Head to Alex Jones' social media where he's sharing Tim and Eric sketches to try and prove that Tim Heidecker is a Satanist or something.
28
please_and_thankyouApr 25, 2026
+1
Harvey’s 75 yrs old. I know he won’t want to, but he’s gonna have to stop eventually.
1
DeekALeekApr 25, 2026
+1
Rupert Murdoch is 95 years old and isn’t stopping anytime soon.
1
dragonslayerbarbieApr 25, 2026
+9
> I am not sure what is the motive here.
Money. More money. It's aways more money.
9
SonUnforseenByFrodoApr 25, 2026
+4
This. Always follow the Money to find Motivation
4
Mmicb0bApr 25, 2026
+2
I could see it as Murdoch turning on Trump
2
BadAtExistingApr 25, 2026
+1
Ratings and relevancy. Their traditional Hollywood/celebrity “news” has fallen off but everyone talks about politics and politicians’ scandals are far more juicy at this point
1
Putrid_Anybody_2947Apr 25, 2026
+23
It wasnt their job its the media but the media is wants access ao they drop the ball.
23
sagenumenApr 25, 2026
+4
TMZ is media
4
mzlangeApr 25, 2026
+1
Agree, there’s media and there’s journalism
1
Exotic_Dependent3247Apr 25, 2026
+13
Yeah this is not a good thing the joke has long been that DC is Hollywood for ugly people, but all this will do is magnify the worst people and the attention whoring not enable sober dialogue, but i guess that doesn’t exist.
13
GreatsnesApr 25, 2026
+10
If the Paps went after politicians as hard as they do celebrities then we’d get more shit done in this country. And man is that a sad sentence to type.
10
1970s_MonkeyKingApr 25, 2026
+3
Lawyering up. Connect that with "smelling blood in the water" midterms.
3
stryker_castApr 25, 2026
+8
Who cares why, LET'S GOOOOOO TMZ!
8
JasonVorheheesApr 25, 2026
+3
They’ve been tipped that things are going to happen so they’re not afraid of blowback
3
my_boy_blu_Apr 25, 2026
+5
I love every bit of this. Imagine all the dirt they can find.
5
Zealousideal-Bite735Apr 25, 2026
+2
I thought they were owned by the Murdoch empire?
2
whimsical-crack-rockApr 25, 2026
+1
TMZ is just another rabid dog on a leash, Someone wants them to go after certain people now. It’s not because they just want to bring accountability to the government. It’s a garbage organization, just because they happened to make someone you dislike look stupid does not mean they are “one of the good guys”
1
AirbagOffApr 25, 2026
+1
Harvey Levin is a right-wing gay man in the mold of Peter Thiel. He had no interest in using his powers for good and going after Republicans. Not sure what changed.
1
bomilk19Apr 25, 2026
+1
Money. I predict a Thiel buy out.
1
Zestyclose-Ice-8569Apr 25, 2026
+3
Funny the type of politicians/administration officials they go after with real questions as opposed to softball questions.
3
PlatonicTroglodyteApr 25, 2026
+3
Well for starters, TMZ is named after the Thirty Mile Zone centered on Beverly and La Cienega Blvds in LA, which is about 2,300 miles away from DC.
3
IamL0rdV0ldem0rtApr 25, 2026
+1
I have seen this exact comment elsewhere, what does that have to do with anything?
1
PlatonicTroglodyteApr 25, 2026
+1
Well, the headline wants to know why TMZ hasn’t been getting success in Washington reporting until now. My point was that it is a pop culture-driven, locally focused gossip organization based on the other side of the country, so maybe that’s why.
1
IamL0rdV0ldem0rtApr 25, 2026
+1
Ok, that makes sense and seems obvious now. I commented before fully waking up.
1
D-ouble-D-utchApr 25, 2026
+2
Wild they're the only ones asking hard questions.
2
ButtSpelunker420Apr 25, 2026
+1
Flexing, really?
1
Oy_wth_the_poodlesApr 25, 2026
+1
I’m all for this! Please report all the stupid shit they do when they should be “representing” their constituents.
1
Fun-Bug5106Apr 25, 2026
+1
It seems they’re the only outlet not compromised in some capacity
69 Comments