· 69 comments · Save ·
For Sale Apr 25, 2026 at 7:22 AM

TMZ is flexing in Washington, with high-profile results. What took so long?

Posted by LynnK0919


TMZ is flexing in Washington, with high-profile results. What took so long?
AP News
TMZ is flexing in Washington, with high-profile results. What took so long?
TMZ is making a splash in Washington, D.C., bringing its Hollywood-style paparazzi tactics to politics.

🚩 Report this post

69 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
talk-spontaneously 12 hr ago +225
Well when I think of TMZ, I envision that iconic 2006 photo of Britney Spears, Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan in a car.
225
Aggravating_Life7851 12 hr ago +64
Do you remember it being referred to as The Bimbo Summit? Wild times
64
AMediaArchivist 11 hr ago +25
I remember the word fire crotch. I don’t remember who coined the term but I saw it on TMZ in the 2000s and it referred to Lindsay Lohan
25
funkympc 9 hr ago +39
"Fire crotch" has been an insult for as long as I can remember. Certainly predating TMZ by many years. I heard it for first time in middle school in the 90s.
39
SumpCrab 9 hr ago +13
Yeah, I have a few gingers in my family, firecrotch was around way before this.
13
jediracer 9 hr ago +5
Insult?
5
SomeCountryFriedBS 6 hr ago +1
More like "lewd slang"
1
K_Linkmaster 4 hr ago +1
Insult is hilarious. I hear fire crotch and it's damn near a mating call! Redheads rule! Make more! Their physiology is fascinating as well in that they have a higher pain tolerance. That makes warriors.
1
Self-Comprehensive 5 hr ago +1
It's not an insult.
1
funkympc 5 hr ago +1
If i had red hair and was called fire crotch I would be personally insulted and would probably punch the person called me that.
1
Solid_Stress_9801 10 hr ago +17
Greasy bear said it
17
Defiant_Tomatillo907 5 hr ago +1
[https://i.imgflip.com/5s2lch.jpg](https://i.imgflip.com/5s2lch.jpg)
1
woahwoahwoaharies 11 hr ago +3
sounds like perez hilton’s doing
3
VapidRapidRabbit 7 hr ago +1
That and that pic of Rihanna they published without her consent.
1
pocketjacks 5 hr ago +1
The first time I noticed TMZ was Michael Richards' freakout on stage where he was shouting the N word.
1
MaestroLogical 12 hr ago +156
I would be all for this if it resulted in actual consequences for politicians. As it stands, all it will do is further cement the 'politics as trashy entertainment' nature of our current zeitgeist and I can't see that being a good thing.
156
mollybolly12 9 hr ago +49
Look up Tony Gonzalez, Eric swalwell, and Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick. Cory Mills is in the hot seat. We all get the chance to show politicians actual consequences in November so TMZ has picked the perfect time to provide additional information to voters.
49
RollTh3Maps 7 hr ago +1
The only reason Gonzalez faced consequences is because Swalwell stepped down and the Republicans were ok with losing a vote if the Democrats did too.
1
mollybolly12 7 hr ago +1
Yes, and? None of those three people should be in office. And Cory Mills is still absolutely on the clock. We got two predators and someone who abused campaign finance laws out of office in the course of a couple weeks. Celebrate the wins people, they’re few and far between right now. Pick yourselves up and take advantage of every piece of information you can get.
1
ThunkAsDrinklePeep 7 hr ago +1
> We all get the chance to show politicians actual consequences in November [Looks at gerrymandered districts, and a lack of ranked choice or party seats.] Do we though?
1
mollybolly12 7 hr ago +1
So gerrymandering prevents you from getting a sexual predator out of office? Or what are you saying? Three people resigned, and one more is likely on the clock due to public pressure from reporting on highly unethical/criminal/abusive behavior. Things are far from perfect, but writing off the impact of your vote and your voice is just giving up. By the way, Democrats have consistently pushed for nationwide bans on gerrymandering and VA and CA’s maps are temporary. Ranked choice has not been a nationwide reality but it’s possible in the future. There are very real cracks in the foundation of institutional democrats. We can affect change now more than ever.
1
ThunkAsDrinklePeep 6 hr ago +1
I vote. And there are wins. But we're playing at a c***** where the house has rigged the games. They overwhelmingly are winning and will continue to do so unless we make systemic changes.
1
mollybolly12 6 hr ago +1
Ok what’s systemic changes are you currently working on?
1
notapoliticalalt 9 hr ago +11
This. There is something to be said for TMZ not necessarily adhering to typical Washtingon standards and culture, but at the end of the day, I think they will only make things even trashier.
11
illuminerdi 8 hr ago +6
> I think they will only make things even trashier We both know this isn't remotely possibly for as long as Mango Mussolini is in the white house
6
Master_Art_1286 7 hr ago +1
We’ve been there before during reconstruction/Gilded Age. Being in politics wasn’t a respectable thing back then
1
ImAnOptimistISwear 5 hr ago +1
sometimes you have to meet people where they are educate from there
1
Chrono_Convoy 12 hr ago +141
Yea please sick the Papparazioli’s on Politicians They need to be exposed
141
Huntguy 10 hr ago +30
Honestly. May as well stick the scum to the scum.
30
Witty-Stand888 12 hr ago +64
I gotta admit they usually get the story before everyone else.
64
PalpitationNo3106 9 hr ago +22
They pay more. If you had a photo of something scandalous, would you give it to the billionaire who owns the Post or the Times, or sell it to TMZ?
22
Medialunch 9 hr ago +5
Why not the billionaire?
5
Holmesdale 9 hr ago +23
a) they're c****; and b) there is a long history of catch and kill played by billionaires with political views
23
19snow16 8 hr ago +5
TMZ isn't above catch, kill and, use that info for blackmail.
5
Medialunch 8 hr ago +2
But the comment made it sound like the party that wasn’t the billionaire pays more. As if we should all assume the same.
2
RollTh3Maps 7 hr ago +1
They said “give” it to the billionaire or “sell” it to TMZ.
1
godzillas_zilla 7 hr ago +1
Because reputable journalists wouldn’t pay for the picture/information. TMZ will so they usually get info first.
1
PalpitationNo3106 8 hr ago +3
They won’t pay you.
3
DeekALeek 12 hr ago +47
TMZ is owned by Fox Corporation, which is owned by Rupert Murdoch. I am not sure what is the motive here. Is this a crafty “divide & conquer” and “controlled opposition” tactic to keep MAGA and Rupert in power? Perhaps Rupert finally wants Donny to leave office because he’s pissed-off about something, so now he’s sending his TMZ mercenaries to further pressure MAGA congressmen and administration to do something about Donny by gathering kompromat on everyone? Maybe both, and/or something else? We’re in psychotic times, no doubt. We even saw a day when ‘Infowars’ was taken over by ‘The Onion’ with Tim Heidecker as their new face. So maybe this is a good thing. However, the fact that TMZ are in Washington DC doing these “scoops” is yet-another example of how the current 4th Estate is failing the People (purposely or otherwise, because most major media outlets are owned by pro-MAGA bajilionaires). ::EDIT TO ADD:: Well *NO DUH* the motive is about the money. My question is how much leverage Rupert Murdoch is looking to gain over Trump and/or the next guy taking over as POTUS, and whether this may be a sign of a squabble between Rupert and some other oligarch jostling for supreme media influence. Mind you: Jeff Bezos owns the Washington Post and AWS, and he chose to kiss the ring. But Disney chose to bring back Jimmy Kimmel after Trump’s FCC canceled him and saw ‘Streisand Effect’ higher ratings. So there are two main ways to get more money out of this administration: kiss the ring, or hit back with much larger crowd support.
47
Subliminal_Kiddo 11 hr ago +28
Harvey's contract stipulated he would remain in control of TMZ and have editorial freedom. It's generally believed that Fox will keep that in place when his 5-year-contract is up for negotiations because he's too good at running the enterprise. The Murdoch's prioritize money, they don't care if they come off as hypocritical or even monstrous\*. The Wall Street Journal has been criticizing Trump for years. One could argue Murdoch uses the Mac strategy of pitting his publications against one another and playing both sides so he always comes out on top. \*Look into their UK tabloid The Sun. They used to run a feature called The Page 3 Girl, which was a topless photo of a model printed on Page 3. For decades, there was a loophole in British law that allowed girls as young as 16 to pose. They would even feature a little box with photos of the models at 15 in bikinis with a countdown until the number of days she'd be old enough for them to publish the topless photos. It's insane. ETA: And if you want a good laugh. Head to Alex Jones' social media where he's sharing Tim and Eric sketches to try and prove that Tim Heidecker is a Satanist or something.
28
please_and_thankyou 5 hr ago +1
Harvey’s 75 yrs old. I know he won’t want to, but he’s gonna have to stop eventually.
1
DeekALeek 5 hr ago +1
Rupert Murdoch is 95 years old and isn’t stopping anytime soon.
1
dragonslayerbarbie 11 hr ago +9
> I am not sure what is the motive here. Money. More money. It's aways more money.
9
SonUnforseenByFrodo 9 hr ago +4
This. Always follow the Money to find Motivation
4
Mmicb0b 10 hr ago +2
I could see it as Murdoch turning on Trump
2
BadAtExisting 8 hr ago +1
Ratings and relevancy. Their traditional Hollywood/celebrity “news” has fallen off but everyone talks about politics and politicians’ scandals are far more juicy at this point
1
Putrid_Anybody_2947 12 hr ago +23
It wasnt their job its the media but the media is wants access ao they drop the ball.
23
sagenumen 10 hr ago +4
TMZ is media
4
mzlange 9 hr ago +1
Agree, there’s media and there’s journalism 
1
Exotic_Dependent3247 12 hr ago +13
Yeah this is not a good thing the joke has long been that DC is Hollywood for ugly people, but all this will do is magnify the worst people and the attention whoring not enable sober dialogue, but i guess that doesn’t exist.
13
Greatsnes 10 hr ago +10
If the Paps went after politicians as hard as they do celebrities then we’d get more shit done in this country. And man is that a sad sentence to type.
10
1970s_MonkeyKing 9 hr ago +3
Lawyering up. Connect that with "smelling blood in the water" midterms.
3
stryker_cast 12 hr ago +8
Who cares why, LET'S GOOOOOO TMZ!
8
JasonVorhehees 9 hr ago +3
They’ve been tipped that things are going to happen so they’re not afraid of blowback
3
my_boy_blu_ 12 hr ago +5
I love every bit of this. Imagine all the dirt they can find.
5
Zealousideal-Bite735 8 hr ago +2
I thought they were owned by the Murdoch empire?
2
whimsical-crack-rock 7 hr ago +1
TMZ is just another rabid dog on a leash, Someone wants them to go after certain people now. It’s not because they just want to bring accountability to the government. It’s a garbage organization, just because they happened to make someone you dislike look stupid does not mean they are “one of the good guys”
1
AirbagOff 6 hr ago +1
Harvey Levin is a right-wing gay man in the mold of Peter Thiel. He had no interest in using his powers for good and going after Republicans. Not sure what changed.
1
bomilk19 6 hr ago +1
Money. I predict a Thiel buy out.
1
Zestyclose-Ice-8569 11 hr ago +3
Funny the type of politicians/administration officials they go after with real questions as opposed to softball questions.
3
PlatonicTroglodyte 8 hr ago +3
Well for starters, TMZ is named after the Thirty Mile Zone centered on Beverly and La Cienega Blvds in LA, which is about 2,300 miles away from DC.
3
IamL0rdV0ldem0rt 7 hr ago +1
I have seen this exact comment elsewhere, what does that have to do with anything?
1
PlatonicTroglodyte 6 hr ago +1
Well, the headline wants to know why TMZ hasn’t been getting success in Washington reporting until now. My point was that it is a pop culture-driven, locally focused gossip organization based on the other side of the country, so maybe that’s why.
1
IamL0rdV0ldem0rt 6 hr ago +1
Ok, that makes sense and seems obvious now. I commented before fully waking up.
1
D-ouble-D-utch 8 hr ago +2
Wild they're the only ones asking hard questions.
2
ButtSpelunker420 10 hr ago +1
Flexing, really?
1
Oy_wth_the_poodles 7 hr ago +1
I’m all for this! Please report all the stupid shit they do when they should be “representing” their constituents.
1
Fun-Bug5106 7 hr ago +1
It seems they’re the only outlet not compromised in some capacity
1
ARoodyPooCandyAss 8 hr ago
I loved hearing this actually.
0
← Back to Board