Does this mean trans men can compete in the women’s category?
I don’t imagine they’d want to, but it’d be an interesting point to make.
311
StrawberryDulcetMar 27, 2026
+154
Yes there was a trans man competing in the women’s events in the Paris summer games. A boxer. Hergie Bacyadan. https://www.thepinknews.com/2024/08/05/hergie-bacyadan-paris-olympics-trans/
He chose not to take hrt medication in order to compete as his birth sex.
154
catchy_phrase76Mar 27, 2026
+28
Like never took it or stopped for the games?
28
StrawberryDulcetMar 27, 2026
+64
He decided to prioritize his sports career and never took hormones.
64
Fantastic-Chair-9155Mar 27, 2026
+4
Wow that’s really interesting. He must be super passionate about his career!
4
Triaspia2Mar 27, 2026
+14
From my understanding they were waiting till after competing to start
14
MerisuolaMar 27, 2026
+16
> “[I] will never take ‘T’ and will never be on ‘T’, but consider myself a trans man because my heart says so,” the middleweight wrote.
From the linked article
16
Calm-Maintenance-878Mar 27, 2026
+20
They should fail the test, fair to compete. I do recall this playing out at a college level I think, not testing though. The trans man won…a lot…but it’s what the people are asking for. Might have been high school level, don’t recall in full.
20
OnlyKey5675Mar 27, 2026
+39
Yes. Trans men can compete in men's category.
Policies often allow this because transitioning from female to male (FTM) is not typically considered to provide an unfair competitive advantage
39
jgainitMar 27, 2026
+52
The poster was saying trans men competing in women’s. Dumb take
52
jgainitMar 27, 2026
+14
These takes are so dumb. I love how people like to say it’s complicated when it isn’t. Cis xx chromosome: women’s category. Everyone else, “men’s” aka open
14
CombatMuffinMar 27, 2026
+7
If you are trying to make it less complicated just dismiss segregation by gender... and then the results will likely be one sided and nobody wins anything, which also ends up harming women in sports.
The reality is that it *is* complicated, because there is no visble solution where everyone gets what they want. At some point somebody has to compromise, and so far there is no definitive consensus, which is why these debates and discussions continue.
7
indigoneutrinoMar 27, 2026
+2
Not if they're taking testosterone. If they're not, I don't see what would stop them.
2
whowhodillybarMar 27, 2026
+613
> “Eligibility for any female category event at the Olympic Games or any other IOC event, including individual and team sports, is now limited to biological females,” the International Olympic Committee said, to be determined by a mandatory gene test once in an athlete’s career.
I am getting Futurama Gender-Bender memories. The oil test before competing against the Fem-Bots.
Did the IOC just copy Futurama?
613
FattappleMar 27, 2026
+125
Hail! Hail! Robonia!
A land I didn’t make up!
125
Antichristopher4Mar 27, 2026
+228
Technically the IOC is copying themselves, just 40 years later.
They've already done this. In the 80s. It went terribly, because a lot of assigned female at birth, born-and-raised women suddenly discovered they weren't as "biologically female" as their lived experience told them.
https://www.ctvnews.ca/sports/article/gender-testing-returns-to-track-stirring-up-harsh-memories-and-doubts-that-date-to-the-1980s/
228
tpeeeezyMar 27, 2026
+115
that whole Futurama episode was directly making fun of mtf people btw
115
NlghtmanComethMar 27, 2026
+102
Not sure how a person could watch that and not realize this lol. It’s even more overt than the soutb park episode.
102
ThatKidDrewMar 27, 2026
+13
more than they make fun of everything else or?
13
adj_noun_digitMar 27, 2026
+3
If they want equality they should be okay with cartoons poking fun at them.
3
impoverishedwhtebrdMar 27, 2026
+42
How about they get equality first. Then we can talk about whether or not "poking fun" at them is okay. Not the other way around.
42
Gurlllllllll-Mar 27, 2026
+7
Yeah seriously. Trans people can't even f****** drive in Kansas and we're acting like there's equality.
7
Wild-Word4967Mar 27, 2026
+32
I wonder what they are going to do when they find out that there are a fair number of people who are intersex. They have genes of both genders.
32
kuroxnMar 27, 2026
+64
There have been cases already and they just get labelled as men too and unable to compete
64
FattappleMar 27, 2026
+21
Looks like they got that covered. From a quick search their criteria is related to the SRY gene being active. So like XX with active SRY gene would be considered male, and XY with inactive SRY would be female.
21
WeHaveTheMeepsMar 27, 2026
+89
From the article:
“It is unclear how many, if any, transgender women are competing at an Olympic level. No woman who transitioned from being born male competed at the 2024 Paris Summer Games, though weightlifter Laurel Hubbard did at the Tokyo Olympics in 2021 without winning a medal.”
89
AuroraBoreale22Mar 27, 2026
+11
So, it is, at best, marketing and propaganda, to appeal to a specific part of the political spectrum, at worst a step for "female genetic purity" or something like that. Doesn't sound bad at all /s
11
BioDieselDogMar 27, 2026
+94
There are good arguments on both sides, this is my best shot at summarizing and comparing the two views:
Person A's View: Women's sports should be a category for all people who live and identify as women. Excluding a sub-group (trans women) is seen as a form of discrimination that mirrors historical exclusions based on race or disability.
Person B's View: Women's sports were not created based on "gender identity," but as a protected category for those without the physiological advantages of male puberty. From this perspective, the category exists to ensure that those with female biology have a space where they can be competitive and win.
The debate essentially boils down to whether you believe the "protected category" of women's sports is defined by gender identity or by the absence of male physiological development.
94
wyldmageMar 27, 2026
+68
To take it a step further, look at the Special Olympics. An even more restrictive class of events designed to give those with severe physical restrictions a place to still compete.
Nowhere near as prestigious as ANY division of the regular olympics, but still a big deal for those who do compete there.
Would it be fair to allow Michael Jordan to compete in them if he cut his ears off? He'd qualify as having a disability...
But it would NOT be fair to all the other people participating in it.
As you bring up, Olympics should really have a "Anyone" category, and then have "Protected" categories that opt for more restrictive (female birth, no hormone therapies ever), rather than less. Because that's the intent behind the division in almost every sports league.
WNBA doesn't exist because women need a space free of penises on the court. They need a space where a biological woman is capable of being the best performer.
A great example is running. Olympic 10,000m run male record is Joshua Cheptegei's 26:43.14. For females, it is Almaz Ayana coming in at 29:17.45. A quick google shows that the USA \_High School\_ male record is 28:32.7. That is, a male high school athlete from a nation NOT known for setting Olympic records (and the kid was definitely white as can be) is faster than the best woman long distance runner that the world has ever seen.
If that event allowed MtF athletes, Ayana's record wouldn't even make top 10 within a decade. And within a century, "Women's" records would closely resemble men's.
68
MsmadmamaMar 27, 2026
+31
The special Olympics are for the mentally handicapped. You are thinking of the paralympics
31
althoradeemMar 27, 2026
+5
a man will crush a woman in just about any sport. its just an unfair advantage.
it's more about having an unfair physical advantage.
its just the way nature works. you can think yourself a different gender all you want it doesn't take those advantages away.
an example was lia thomas, from not being in the top 500 to being in the top 5.
it's just that big of an advantage.
5
robert_madgeMar 27, 2026
+8
You know what I find interesting about Lia Thomas? Facts. While she ranked high in some individual events she was never the best overall and routinely got her ass handed to her. From Wikipedia:
In a race during January 2022 at a meet against UPenn's Ivy League rival Yale, Thomas finished in 6th place in the 100m freestyle race, losing to four cisgender women and Iszac Henig, a transgender man, who transitioned without hormone therapy.[24]
In March 2022, Thomas became the first openly transgender athlete to win an NCAA Division I national championship in any sport after winning the women's 500-yard freestyle with a time of 4:33.24; Olympic silver medalist Emma Weyant was second with a time 1.75 seconds behind Thomas.[25][26][27] Thomas did not break any records at the NCAA event, while Kate Douglass broke 18 NCAA records.[28] Thomas was 9.18 seconds short of Katie Ledecky's NCAA record of 4:24.06.[29] In the preliminaries for the 200 freestyle, Thomas finished second. In the final for the 200 freestyle, Thomas placed fifth with a time of 1:43.50. In the preliminaries for the 100 freestyle, Thomas finished tenth. In the finals for the 100 freestyle, Thomas placed eighth out of eight competitors in 48.18 seconds, finishing last.[30]
8
Jettx02Mar 27, 2026
+1
This is the problem I have with the debate, people spread misinformation without bothering to check. When competing on the men’s team before her transition she had the 6th fastest time for the 1,000 yard freestyle. It’s simply a lie to pretend like she wasn’t extremely good before her transition while competing as a man. She was ranked much lower as a man, but she was also a freshmen dealing with severe mental health issues.
The fact is that whether she had an unfair advantage or not, it doesn’t actually matter for what people are going to believe. People who want to insist she was awful and the only reason she’s good now is because of her transition will do so with or without evidence and some people will be adamant that her male puberty did ABSOLUTELY nothing to give her an advantage, but most people won’t stop to consider the natural differences within people in general.
Michael Phelps is actually a great example. He has genuine genetic advantages over other biological men, should he have to take something that causes his muscles to produce lactic acid as a standard rate? The argument against trans athletes is generally not a scientific one, even from people who pretend like they care about the science
1
GottaUseEmAllMar 27, 2026
+16
Banned from competing in women's events\*
They're not banned from the Olympics.
16
MoreCarnationsMar 27, 2026
+135
Women’s sports should be protected. This is a good thing.
135
RobCoxxyMar 27, 2026
+1
Only one trans woman has competed in 20 years and she came last.
The only thing this is going to do is result in women who have lived their entire lives as cis women, with children, everything, who have previously undiagnosed varieties of intersex conditions having their lives turned upside down, identity called into question, and harassed by the press and the sad billionaire wizard author.
It's the entire reason sex testing was abandoned in the first place. It's humiliating, it's a financial burden for poorer countries, it's easy to get false positives and
.. it's utterly meaningless. Human DNA, human sex is varied, and a lot more people live outside the bigot-idealised, "baby's first biology lesson" absolute binary than you realise.
[Here's the guy that discovered the SRY Gene and convinced the IOC to abandon this test the first time around on why this is a bad decision](https://theconversation.com/world-athletics-mandatory-genetic-test-for-women-athletes-is-misguided-i-should-know-i-discovered-the-relevant-gene-in-1990-262367)
If the IOC really gave a rat's ass about "protecting women" surely it would, I dunno, [ban rapists from participating instead?](https://www.theguardian.com/sport/article/2024/jul/25/ioc-investigation-child-rapist-steven-van-de-velde-paris-olympic-games-2024)
1
Dependent-Title-1362Mar 27, 2026
+17
I had to scroll from California to Tokyo to find this comment. 100 % agree
17
[deleted]Mar 27, 2026
+255
[removed]
255
CraziestMoonManMar 27, 2026
+255
I will get downvoted to hell for this but I agree with them doing this. I have no problem in everyday life with whoever wants to be whatever gender they want and live life how they want. When it comes to sports I don’t think it should be allowed though. Men and women are so different and it does create a unfair advantage.
255
SaltyTigerBeefMar 27, 2026
+6
Pre-complain about downvotes and I will always oblige. Now you can feel persecuted. You’re welcome.
6
BaguetterektMar 27, 2026
+4
"I know I'm going to get downvoted to hell but uhhhhh transwomen no sportacus"
*Reliably never downvoted to hell, several hundred upvoted actually*
4
zizou00Mar 27, 2026
+7
Sport is inherently about unfair advantages. I'm not built like Saquon Barkley. No amount of training will get me to be as fast as Usain Bolt was. They would be able to beat me in any sport, let alone their own specialisation. Is that fair? No. Of course not. But it shouldn't be. Sport is about competing under a code and maximising any advantage you can find without breaking the rules.
More women will be unfairly punished under this ruling than any number of trans athletes will ever exist in women's sports. We've already seen cisgender women (usually non-white women, which is the real kicker) get transvestigated despite being relatively mundane within their classes, they just look masculine or are big. Which duh, every athlete is gonna show signs of being what we call traditionally masculine, because having muscles and being able to be a professional athlete and to look like a professional athlete was for so long a male dominated endeavour, so people got used to the hallmarks of being a ripped athlete being a masculine thing. Women produce testosterone. It is not the be-all and end all of athleticism.
7
KatsuleleMar 27, 2026
+1
You can’t compare men with women for this, you have to compare trans and cis women. This happens all the time with this stupid debate that I wish would just go away. Trans women are not the same as a cis man competing. People just nonchalantly state “men have such an advantage” while ignoring the fact trans women aren’t men. Hormone therapy does reduce athletic performance, how much is the only thing that should matter. And I don’t care if people want to ban trans women from competing as women (due to having a small advantage here or there because sports is suddenly perfectly fair and it’s definently only bound by determination) or make a new category that will barely ever see participants. I’m just tired of this all being labeled “men in womens sports” because it’s not true unless you’re actually transphobic. So if you wanna comment on this debate please just do so without using the bs language shoveled to the masses while pretending you’re an ally or supportive.
1
breckenduskMar 27, 2026
+39
The problem isn't with comparing cis men with trans women, it's with comparing trans women with cis women. It's unfair to cis women, full stop. Reduced athletic performance is only significant if it fully negates the natural athletic advantage of being born male which is effectively impossible.
39
secretman2therescueMar 27, 2026
+4
A study just came out showing that trans women fare worse in strength per kilogram of body weight when compared to cis women. I believe 19% worse
4
AnAvidIndoorsmanMar 27, 2026
+7
Sports science research/methodology is famously horrible and the number of elite trans athletes is very low for study purposes.
Can you link the study you're referencing?
7
CBennett2147Mar 27, 2026
+14
Perhaps not every individual comment needs to state "biological male versus biological female." People do, in fact, abbreviate their thoughts for the sake of brevity. It's not necessarily an attack on trans people.
14
KatsuleleMar 27, 2026
+1
How is “trans women in womens sports” so much longer that it requires brevity?
I get that politicians decided to make this a bigger issue than it really should be, and as such poisoned the waters with very specific language so we don’t focus on them lining their pockets with money. But to say that misrepresenting an issue is just in the sake of brevity is either ignoring what the language is actually saying or being genuinely hostile.
1
TeflonTony69Mar 27, 2026
+3
"trans women" are biological males and often have gone thru male puberty making it objectively a male body competing against female bodies its literally that simple
3
TotheendofsinMar 27, 2026
-16
If it created an unfair advantage then surely you have examples of Trans Women winning medals
-16
lewgerMar 27, 2026
+46
I think you've got your logic wrong. Being able to win an Olympic medal consists of an incredibly small number of people who have the physical gifts / mental grit and dedication.
The number of MtF athletes is a tiny percentage and that they aren't close to the medals makes statistical sense.
It's no different to if I took "all the enhancing drugs" and still didn't have a chance at weight lifting.
46
PM_ME_FLUFFY_DOGSMar 27, 2026
+21
The number of humans with an exetreme genetic advantages to say swimming is also tiny but there Micheal phelps is with the most gold medals in history...
21
AutisumMar 27, 2026
+6
Yah, but they were born with those genetic advantages…
6
PM_ME_FLUFFY_DOGSMar 27, 2026
+8
So how is it any different??? Make it makes sense. If one advantage is unfair so should the rest. Ban tall people from basketball as its unfair short people have no hope of ever making the nba!
You also do realize this will only primarily ban cis women with dsd who were also born with that correct??? F****** doughnut for brain transphobes.
8
AutisumMar 27, 2026
+4
Shaq being born 7'1" is different from someone getting height surgery to get an advantage in bball. CIS women born with dsd is different from athletes taking chemicals to transition.
Imane Khelif is a good example of a woman who was born with high testosterone that gives her a crazy advantage over her competitors. What she went through (mandatory sex test and discrimination) is bullshit. But that's different from a woman transitioning to a man via testosterone shots and still competing against women.
4
OK_Stop_AlreadyMar 27, 2026
+8
>Imane Khelif is a good example of a woman who was born with high testosterone that gives her a crazy advantage over her competitors.
Her opponent had a history of losing to other cis women, and had a habit of diving when a match didn't look good for her.
by contrast, Imane Khelif is not an undefeated athlete. There is no 'unfair advantage'.
Its SPORTS. Its competition.
8
OK_Stop_AlreadyMar 27, 2026
+8
"taking chemicals" they're called hormones and produced naturally by the body.
8
crunchsmashMar 27, 2026
+7
Messi took growth hormones to increase his height.
7
TheRealK95Mar 27, 2026
+47
How many of you are going to parade this ridiculous argument? Growing up with the additional testosterone creates an unfair advantage physically. It’s basic science. Men and women’s sports have been separated for years because of it to provide a more equal playing field. It has nothing to do with gender discrimination. Just because a trans athlete may not have won a medal, doesn’t mean they don’t have an unfair advantage in that regard.
Besides, with all due respect, didn’t the trans UPENN swimmer break damn near every women’s swimming record once allowed to compete? That’s a clear case of a trans athlete having an advantage but I’m sure y’all will try to find a way to make it personal anyway.
https://www.npr.org/2025/07/02/nx-s1-5454369/upenn-swimming-records-feds-transgender-athletes
I personally think the solution that would be most fair is what major world races do, just introduce a non-binary category that allows athletes to compete without strict gender restrictions. There’s no perfect answer but yall seriously need to grow up here. It’s not transphobia to look for the best way to keep athletics fair for all.
47
TheBonesmMar 27, 2026
+4
I think "keep athletics fair for all" is a bit of an oxymoron, particularly based on "fair". if you are the best in the world it is because you were born that way (and have the nutrition/training necessary to maximize it). For example, Michael Phelps was born with longer wingspan and double jointedness, that is what allowed him to be the best swimmer. Is it much different if a person is born with a gender identity that doesn't align with their sex assignment? Is that fair or unfair? Is Michael Phelps fair or unfair?
4
TheRealK95Mar 27, 2026
+6
Of course there’s always going to be various advantages and disadvantages outside of people’s controls. But in the cases of people willingly changing their genders and then competing in those athletics, particularly men transitioning to women, generates an unfair advantage that you do generally have control over. I know there are obviously more complicated cases and nuances to that. But I don’t think it’s unfair to not want people to be able to compete with an unfair advantage from personal choices made within their control.
Steroid usage is an advantage that’s banned within someone’s control for example, and what does it do ironically? Increases testosterone. A man transitioning to a woman does have increased testosterone over someone born a woman.
6
OK_Stop_AlreadyMar 27, 2026
+5
If it were really about biological fairness you'd be against Phelps.
5
TheBonesmMar 27, 2026
+3
I don't agree with the "personal choice made within their control" perspective, since it frames life-changing treatment as being a decision made in order to win a medal in sports. People don't transition to do better in sports. But I do agree people take steroids to do better in sports, although not because it is part of a treatment plan.
3
tpeeeezyMar 27, 2026
+43
copied from another response
edit: stop awarding me thats stupid. this isnt even my comment i just copied it because its a succinct list. imma play marathon now and ignore my inbox
That is just patently false. Here are a few examples:
**Katheryn Phillips**
Kate Phillips won the 2025 USA Cycling national championship in the women’s masters 55-59 year ol category.
**Veronica Garcia**
Veronica Garcia won back-to-back state high school championships in Washington in the 400-meter run. She told anti-trans detractors after the state meet to “Get a life.”
**Ana Caldas**
Trans swimmer Ana Caldas won five national championships in swimming in the women’s 45-49 age category. Her margins of victory have shocked a lot of people, as she won by margins rarely seen in swimming.
**AB Hernandez**
AB Hernandez, a trans girl competing in girls track and field in California, blew away the competition at the Ontario Relays invitational, beating the second-place finisher by 8 feet, a shocking margin. It was about the same margin from second place to 13th place, which was last.
**Aayden Gallagher**
Aayden Gallagher won a high school girls track and field state championship in Oregon in the 200-meter race.
**Noa-Lynn van Leuven**
Van Leuven won the darts competition at her PDC Challenge Tour debut. Since then, some fellow darts players have spoken out against her inclusion in the sport, while her governing body stands by her.
**Tiffany Abreu**
The volleyball player was a big part of the team that won the 2022 Brazilian Cup. In 2025, at age 40, she won multiple major titles with her club, Osasco. Abreu came out several years earlier, stating she wanted to play in the Olympics. She was not selected by Brazil to compete in Tokyo.
**JayCee Cooper**
Cooper won the women’s 2019 national championship for bench press in the super heavyweight division.
**Michelle Dumaresq**
Michelle Dumaresq had fits and starts competing in the women’s category about two decades ago. Ultimately she won the right to compete and won the 2003 Canadian National Championships in downhill mountain biking.
**Laurel Hubbard**
The Olympic weightlifter won two Oceania Championships and two Commonwealth Championships, amongst many gold medals she won during her competition years, adding a World Masters Games title in 2017, when she won a silver in the World Championships.
**Jamie Hunter**
The billiards player won her first major ranking event when she took the 2022 US Women’s Snooker Open title.
**Veronica Ivy**
Ivy is a two-time masters world champion, notably winning the 2018 UCI World Masters Track Cycling Championships in her age category. Ivy was quickly denounced with hateful social-media messages. She continues to weather that criticism, and she has been a vocal proponent of trans inclusion in sports.
**Austin Killips**
Killips won the female New Mexico’s Tour of the Gila in May 2023. UCI shortly after announced they were re-examining their trans-athlete policy.
**Jenna Lingwood**
Jenna Lingwood won the 40-44 Masters championship at the 2022 USA Cyclocross Nationals in Connecticut.
**Tiffany Newell**
Newell won the women’s 45-49 Canadian indoor 5,000-meter race, setting a national record along the way, in 2022
**Wren Pyle**
Pyle won the 2022 USA Skimo 2022 National Championship in the women’s U23 Sprint.
**Natalie Ryan**
Ryan won two major competitions in Professional Disc Golf Association’s elite tier in 2022, including the MVP Open.
**Sadie Schreiner**
Rochester Institute of Technology sprinter Sadie Schreiner won the 2024 Atlantic Region Outdoor 200-meter title. She also won multiple Liberty League championships.
**Juniper Simonis**
The roller derby athlete has won multiple World Championships with the Women’s Flat Track Derby Association. She was featured on The Trans Sporter Room podcast in 2019.
**CeCé Telfer**
Telfer won the Division II NCAA championship in the 400-meter hurdles as a senior at Franklin Pierce University in 2019. She was named Outsports’ Female Athlete of the Year that year. @cecetelfer
**Lia Thomas**
The University of Pennsylvania swimmer won a national NCAA Division I title in the 500 freestyle and made it to the final heat of the 100-free and 200-free.
43
FriesianRiderMar 27, 2026
+16
Mediocre men becoming top of the line female athletes doesnt mean they are better than the 0.1% of female athletes, it still means they have an unfair advantage. They are just to shit to utilize it.
16
TheAerialMar 27, 2026
+14
Just because other athletes have been able to overcome their unfair advantages doesn’t mean they still aren’t unfair advantages lol.
Unfair Advantages =/= Automatic win.
Unfair =/= Insurmountable
Unfair doesn’t automatically become fair just because it wasn’t enough of an advantage to win.
14
swiftlessonsMar 27, 2026
+4
Not a medal but have you ever watched any of Fallon Foxes MMA fights? After seeing her break a cis woman’s orbital bone, I started rethinking this subject and accepted the possibility that there could be an inherent advantage. Mainly because it really did look like a man beating the breaks off a woman, who later attested that she’s never felt any woman who was that strong or hit so hard. Maybe the advantages don’t carry over as much in other sports, I don’t know.
4
Tonybrazier699Mar 27, 2026
+5
Broken orbital bone is literally one of the most common serious injuries in MMA
5
Ok-Preference-1681Mar 27, 2026
+3
In women's mma it's not really common though, but it does happen.
3
CarrieDurstMar 27, 2026
+2
Best we can do is tons of cis women with DSD
2
pizza_the_muttMar 27, 2026
+1
If this is the wrong thing to do then I ask what is a better test to decide who is eligible for the women's events in the Olympics. If the answer is "no test", then there are no longer women's events in the Olympics, but rather two categories with meaningless labels attached.
1
engin__rMar 27, 2026
+13
Things seemed to work okay in the period where they weren’t doing sex testing and were allowing intersex women to compete.
13
kuroxnMar 27, 2026
+4
So basically women's events have to be turned into a kind of Paralympic event?
4
AndroidUser37Mar 27, 2026
+7
That's what they originally were, dude. The point of a separate women's division was to give them a cordoned off section for themselves. The "men's" division is really the open division anyways. Women are allowed to attempt to compete in the men's, it's just exceedingly rare due to the overwhelming advantage dudes have.
7
kuroxnMar 27, 2026
+3
We're truly shooting ourselves on the foot 😴
3
TheGriffinMar 27, 2026
+18
Oh okay so you're not banned from the white house, you're just not invited
18
gooberfishieMar 27, 2026
+6
More like, your not banned from using the washroom, just the women's washroom. They can still compete in the Olympics.
6
Available_Border1075Mar 27, 2026
+14
That’s good, as long as they can still compete in male and mixed gender categories
14
DumE9876Mar 27, 2026
+2
Except in the cases of sports that are different between men and women. Gymnastics for example. Men’s gymnastics is different to women’s artistic gymnastics, which is different to women’s rhythmic gymnastics. A artistic gymnast woman who the IOC says is not a woman can’t just go do the men’s events. The only event that’s 1:1 is vault. They both do floor, but with different emphasis. The other events (beam and uneven bars for women; parallel bars, horizontal bar, pommel horse, and still rings for men) aren’t things one can just go do well without training.
2
KulaanDoDinokMar 27, 2026
+10
F*** off, it’s the same thing.
10
night_dudeMar 27, 2026
+7
Which effectively bans them from the Olympics because they aren't going to compete in events for a gender they don't feel they belong to. Don't split hairs.
7
YourBonesAreMoistMar 27, 2026
+4
That's on them. Nobody should sacrifice an entire sports division because 2 people got their feelings hurt
4
B0NESAWisRRREADYMar 27, 2026
+5
Which sucks, but whether or not they *feel* they belong to a gender shouldn't be grounds to provide a disadvantage to other athletes.
Sport needs to have a more objective basis than that, unfortunate as it may seem socially. It literally cannot exist otherwise.
5
[deleted]Mar 27, 2026
+410
[removed]
410
SaltyTigerBeefMar 27, 2026
+138
That’s why trans athletes are winning all the medals… oh wait.
138
GirafferageMar 27, 2026
+5
Reality is there are so few trans athletes that this whole debacle is not remotely a problem. The biggest complainer about it is a swimmer who tied with a trans athlete for 5th place...
Why is this a topic anybody is focused on when we are worried about Americans being sent to die in a war for another country.
5
emaw63Mar 27, 2026
+251
For those keeping track at home, exactly one trans woman has even competed in the Olympics in the 20 years they've been allowed to compete. She DQ'd in her weightlifting event.
The actual consequence of this testing policy is that a lot of phenotypically female athletes who have lived their entire lives as female are going to discover they have an intersex condition and have their lives uprooted as a result (this is fairly common for elite female athletes!) This is the big reason the IOC stopped doing this 20 years ago
251
xejeezyMar 27, 2026
+35
Can you add a source for those numbers? A google search indicates 99.9% of cisgender women have XX and intersex combos are between 0.02- 1
35
emaw63Mar 27, 2026
+49
https://www.readtpa.com/p/the-iocs-new-policy-isnt-really-a
>the policy “also restricts female athletes such as two-time Olympic champion runner Caster Semenya with medical conditions known as differences in sex development, or DSD
...
>World Athletics has acknowledged that certain DSDs are roughly 140 times more prevalent among elite female athletes than in the general population, so even if you start breaking down just how rare individual conditions are, they’re more likely to show up in athletes. We don’t know exactly how many women the IOC’s new screening will flag, but we have a pretty good idea of the scale. At the 2016 Rio Olympics, the entire women’s 800 meter podium consisted of athletes with DSDs: Semenya took gold, Francine Niyonsaba of Burundi won silver, and Margaret Wambui of Kenya earned bronze.
49
JcbAzPxMar 27, 2026
+3
Assuming you meant .02% that would still be more than 800 thousand people. Not out of the question that a few of them could be Olympic hopefuls.
3
Public-Radio6221Mar 27, 2026
+9
They are talking about athletes, not regular people.
9
Elgard18Mar 27, 2026
+5
People underestimate how common that kind of percentage still is, especially when then strongly selected for.
Let's take the conservative end of your range, 0.02%, and multiply it by the overrepresentation factor of 140 mentioned by the other commenter. Suddenly you're at 2.8%, or roughly 3 out of every 100 Olympic athletes. Which if accurate would likely mean that this would come up for someone at most if not all Olympics.
5
Ok-Preference-1681Mar 27, 2026
+2
If she succeeded on her planned lifts she would have gotten 3rd place, so a bronze medal. She was over 10 years older than her next nearest aged competitor, at 40 something years old dude.
2
SyntaxLostMar 27, 2026
+3
She didn't. So, why are you trying to present a hypothetical when it's demonstrably false? If other competitors had have executed on their planned lifts, I'm sure the standings would also look very different.
3
billj04Mar 27, 2026
+38
But she didn’t succeed.
38
engin__rMar 27, 2026
+38
Yeah and if I ran an 8 second 100m I’d have the world record. Almost only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades.
38
OK_Stop_AlreadyMar 27, 2026
+3
If I competed in men's swimming and swam faster than Phelps I would also have a medal and a world record.
3
MistryMachine3Mar 27, 2026
+16
That’s not really the point. Just because you can’t use your advantage to victory doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.
16
14X8000mMar 27, 2026
+8
copied from another response
That is just patently false. Here are a few examples:
**Katheryn Phillips**
Kate Phillips won the 2025 USA Cycling national championship in the women’s masters 55-59 year ol category.
**Veronica Garcia**
Veronica Garcia won back-to-back state high school championships in Washington in the 400-meter run. She told anti-trans detractors after the state meet to “Get a life.”
**Ana Caldas**
Trans swimmer Ana Caldas won five national championships in swimming in the women’s 45-49 age category. Her margins of victory have shocked a lot of people, as she won by margins rarely seen in swimming.
**AB Hernandez**
AB Hernandez, a trans girl competing in girls track and field in California, blew away the competition at the Ontario Relays invitational, beating the second-place finisher by 8 feet, a shocking margin. It was about the same margin from second place to 13th place, which was last.
**Aayden Gallagher**
Aayden Gallagher won a high school girls track and field state championship in Oregon in the 200-meter race.
**Noa-Lynn van Leuven**
Van Leuven won the darts competition at her PDC Challenge Tour debut. Since then, some fellow darts players have spoken out against her inclusion in the sport, while her governing body stands by her.
**Tiffany Abreu**
The volleyball player was a big part of the team that won the 2022 Brazilian Cup. In 2025, at age 40, she won multiple major titles with her club, Osasco. Abreu came out several years earlier, stating she wanted to play in the Olympics. She was not selected by Brazil to compete in Tokyo.
**JayCee Cooper**
Cooper won the women’s 2019 national championship for bench press in the super heavyweight division.
**Michelle Dumaresq**
Michelle Dumaresq had fits and starts competing in the women’s category about two decades ago. Ultimately she won the right to compete and won the 2003 Canadian National Championships in downhill mountain biking.
**Laurel Hubbard**
The Olympic weightlifter won two Oceania Championships and two Commonwealth Championships, amongst many gold medals she won during her competition years, adding a World Masters Games title in 2017, when she won a silver in the World Championships.
**Jamie Hunter**
The billiards player won her first major ranking event when she took the 2022 US Women’s Snooker Open title.
**Veronica Ivy**
Ivy is a two-time masters world champion, notably winning the 2018 UCI World Masters Track Cycling Championships in her age category. Ivy was quickly denounced with hateful social-media messages. She continues to weather that criticism, and she has been a vocal proponent of trans inclusion in sports.
**Austin Killips**
Killips won the female New Mexico’s Tour of the Gila in May 2023. UCI shortly after announced they were re-examining their trans-athlete policy.
**Jenna Lingwood**
Jenna Lingwood won the 40-44 Masters championship at the 2022 USA Cyclocross Nationals in Connecticut.
**Tiffany Newell**
Newell won the women’s 45-49 Canadian indoor 5,000-meter race, setting a national record along the way, in 2022
**Wren Pyle**
Pyle won the 2022 USA Skimo 2022 National Championship in the women’s U23 Sprint.
**Natalie Ryan**
Ryan won two major competitions in Professional Disc Golf Association’s elite tier in 2022, including the MVP Open.
**Sadie Schreiner**
Rochester Institute of Technology sprinter Sadie Schreiner won the 2024 Atlantic Region Outdoor 200-meter title. She also won multiple Liberty League championships.
**Juniper Simonis**
The roller derby athlete has won multiple World Championships with the Women’s Flat Track Derby Association. She was featured on The Trans Sporter Room podcast in 2019.
**CeCé Telfer**
Telfer won the Division II NCAA championship in the 400-meter hurdles as a senior at Franklin Pierce University in 2019. She was named Outsports’ Female Athlete of the Year that year. @cecetelfer
**Lia Thomas**
The University of Pennsylvania swimmer won a national NCAA Division I title in the 500 freestyle and made it to the final heat of the 100-free and 200-free.
8
FoxxoMcFoxFaceMar 27, 2026
+10
Where's the Olympic medal on this list? Could've just led with that instead of a wall of random people who won, many of which are wins that don't really mean shit.
Children's sports and Women's billiards... Are you kidding me? The grasping for straws is just pathetic.
10
Hazelix99Mar 27, 2026
+6
No but you see me being trans gives me an inherent advantage in playing pool, obviously.
6
emaw63Mar 27, 2026
+11
None of these people are Olympians. No trans woman has medaled at the Olympics, which is what this thread is about.
11
whatssenguntoagoblinMar 27, 2026
+10
> She told anti-trans detractors after the state meet to “Get a life”
What was the point in adding this? It’s irrelevant to the data you’re trying to provide. There are a ton of questionable comments cisgender athletes make but those are irrelevant just like this one.
Stuff like that detracts from your point and makes the rest of your comment in question as pushing an agenda not based on facts.
10
TristanwithaTMar 27, 2026
+7
Alright, and we’re talking about the Olympics, of which none of these are.
7
CorronchilejanoMar 27, 2026
+57
Not a single trans woman has ever gotten an olympic medal.
Caster Semenaya, a cis woman her entire life, double medalist, would be excluded from participating. A lot more cis women, many of whom will never have had their gender questioned until these tests, won't be able to participate in the womens categories.
This will overwhelmingly be negative for women of any sort, which will no longer be participating in olympic sports.
Crazy that after this long that the entirety of the organizers of the olympics (and you) remain as ignorant and complacent to fascism this way.
57
Streiger108Mar 27, 2026
+45
Genuine question: being xxy is relatively rare in the population. If this will have a large impact, as you claim, on female presenting athletes, doesn't that indicate that they have an advantage over xx athletes? In other words, they're more prevalent in Olympic athletes than in the overall population.
45
delawanaMar 27, 2026
+47
Sure they can have a genetic advantage. The same way that Michael Phelps has a genetic advantage for swimming.
Olympic athletes are built with a ton of visible and invisible genetic advantages that make them olympians. So what’s so different about this one?
47
Dr_WahMar 27, 2026
+5
Serious question - would any rules prevent those in question, with genetic advantages, from participating in the men's events?
5
Spire_CitronMar 27, 2026
+5
Every Olympic athlete who stands a shot at a medal has a genetic advantage of some kind. That's just an aspect of what goes into making someone an exceptional athlete. For many sports, your height or the length of your arms or legs is critical and you don't stand a chance if you're only average. Sometimes different races or ethnic groups have a big biological advantage over others.
5
BethanyBluebirdMar 27, 2026
+26
Sure.. and Michael Phelps has a biological advantage against other swimmers because of a genetic mutation thst causes lactic acid to buold up more slowly in his muscles than in other swimmers, along with a much larger wingspan/more range of motion in his shoulders due to another condition... should he be banned because he has an innate biological advantage against other men competing because dude is basically half whale?
The thing about elite athletes is... they *literally all* have been born with some sort of biological advantage over other athletes. Maybe their brain is just a bit faster. Maybe their legs are a bit longer. Maybe their bones can withstand a tiny bit more force than other peoples' bones. Maybe a male athlete's body naturally produces more testosterone than other male athletes, or the same for a female-- It's what allows them to come out on top, wether that advantage is mental or physical. There are extremely strict rules about the levels of testosterone both men and women competing in the olympics can have in their bodies-- as long as a competitor is wothin that limit they should be allowed to compete.
'Top female athletes tend to have more muscle mass and higher testosterone levels than female athletes competing at a lower levels or your average woman' isn't exactly some sort of hot take..
26
OrwellWhateverMar 27, 2026
+13
> Maybe their legs are a bit longer.
Funny you should mention that... if you look at the height range for hurdles (especially women's hurdles), they're all within two inches of each other. Elite hurdles has such a narrow range of heights because your legs need to be exactly x number of inches so your max stride lines up perfectly with the distance between hurdles
13
FlopeMar 27, 2026
+2
Honestly, sports were way less controversial when we didn't understand how the human body worked. The entire idea of a "fair" sport is a complete fairytale. There has never been an objectively fair competition in history. I don't see why people would draw the line at a woman being XXY having an advantage over a woman who is XX, as if that is a bigger genetic advantage than Usain Bolt has over me in the 100 meter dash. If I was born on a treadmill and trained 18 hours a day for my entire life I would still never have a chance at outrunning Bolt. That's just genetics.
You think if I trained really hard I could ever compete against Michael Phelps? No, because I don't have f****** webbed feet or arms long enough to pick up dropped change without bending over. Literally nobody has a problem with Bolt or Phelps competing with their genetic advantages but when it comes to the Y chromosome suddenly everyone is an expert scientist with an opinion.
2
09f3jnsMar 27, 2026
+3
The Olympics didn't recognize transgender athletes until the Stockholm Consensus in 2003. Before that point, if an athlete had XY chromosomes then they would compete in the Men's category, and if XX, then women's. Women had competed in the Olympics for a century by that point.
My question to you: Why weren't women deterred from competing in the Olympics prior to 2003?
3
belljs87Mar 27, 2026
+3
Comparing this to fascism is just as ridiculous as your assumption that this will be "overwhelmingly negative" for all women.
Look, I'm all for people being who they want to be, who they feel they are, and taking whatever steps they seem necessary to reach the feeling of being comfortable in their own skin. Everyone deserves that right.
But, Olympians don't deserve to have to compete against people who went through puberty as the opposite gender.
I do not agree with any form of sex testing to achieve that result, however. You are correct that there would be women unfairly excluded due to technicalities, though that number would be exceedingly low according to statistics. The problem is, that number should be zero, so I can't get behind sex testing without a plan in place to address the cases in which someone is technically intersex, but would otherwise have grown up with no discernable advantage because of it.
3
CorronchilejanoMar 27, 2026
+13
>Comparing this to fascism is just as ridiculous as your assumption that this will be "overwhelmingly negative" for all women.
Very first line in the article.
>Transgender women athletes are now excluded from women’s events at the Olympics after the IOC agreed to a new eligibility policy on Thursday which aligns with US President Donald Trump’s executive order on sports ahead of the 2028 Los Angeles Games.
So none of this follows any other guideline other than a literal executive order.
13
WeHaveTheMeepsMar 27, 2026
+10
Not every trans woman has male levels of testosterone during development…
10
TomKansasCityMar 27, 2026
+12
Men and women are built differently in ways that affect athletic performance. Men generally have more muscle mass, especially in the upper body, denser bones, bigger hearts and lungs, and higher testosterone, all of which help with strength, speed, and explosive power. Women usually have more body fat, greater flexibility, and more slow twitch muscle fibers, which favor endurance and agility. These differences do not mean women cannot be amazing athletes, just that biology gives men an edge in raw strength and speed on average.
12
JackLaytonsMoustacheMar 27, 2026
+237
"We can look the other way for genocide, but draw the line at trans women!" - The IOC
237
CuriositiesMar 27, 2026
+200
There was also the rapist that competed in the 2024 Olympics. The man who competed for the Netherlands and admitted to raping a 12-year-old child years before.
But you know, ‘protect women’.
>Steven van de Velde (Dutch pronunciation: [ˈsteːvə(ɱ) vɑn də ˈvɛldə]; born 8 August 1994) is a Dutch beach volleyball player and convicted child rapist. He was convicted of child r*** in 2016; in 2014, when Van de Velde was 19, he raped a 12-year-old British girl, after contacting her on social media, travelling to Britain to meet her, and giving her alcohol. He returned to sport in 2018 and participated in the 2024 Summer Olympics, with the Dutch Olympic Committee standing by their nomination despite a petition calling for him to be removed. The same year, he won a bronze medal at the 2024 European Championships.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_van_de_Velde
200
1877KlownsForKidsMar 27, 2026
+80
There's also the rapist who was elected president
80
ZepertixMar 27, 2026
+3
Ok but I would love to see him compete in like skiing or swimming or ice skating. Wouldn't that legitimately be a good watch?
Maybe we can get him on board, think of the ratings!
3
DingerSinger2016Mar 27, 2026
+2
Those inflankles aren't gonna fit in some skates lmao
2
JackLaytonsMoustacheMar 27, 2026
+19
To be fair, they're "protecting" the competition, they never claimed to "protect" women from sexual assault.
19
spider_seasonMar 27, 2026
+20
Trans people don't have a superPAC that can torpedo congressional races. Israel does. 🇮🇱💀
20
RobCoxxyMar 27, 2026
+1
Trans woman*
There's only been one that competed in the last 20 years and she came last
1
RedNewzzMar 27, 2026
+12
I think it's a good call. What's much more important than Trans-women in sports are Trans-people accepted into their global communities with respect and dignity.
The tiny amount of Trans-women in high level adult sports has been so incredibly divisive for so little reward that I think it's done more damage to them as a class of people to be humanized by cis society and embraced as warmly as any other neighbor ... that the fights around the minuscule percentage in serious sport makes the social evolution of acceptance more controversial and adversarial than it does anything positive for the group as a whole to be seen as simply people.
The biggest conversation around Trans people for the last 10 years has surrounded a couple of dozen aspiring professional athletes that have become a hot cultural argument that distracts from the common humanity 99.9% of them share in an effort to simply go about their daily lives.
Ethical, educated, compassionate people have valid disagreements whether or not trans-women belong in "female sports", so the idea that most people around the world can even begin to approach that kind of nuance without devolving into hateful & fearful othering is honestly an unreasonable expectation.
I'm all for open categories or letting Trans-women compete in male categories *in order to completely extinguish the hate fuel around the topic* that has been so successful in getting more restrictive and negative laws passed against them worldwide.
I hope this takes away some of the red meat that haters have been using to fuel the heat of their bases, and that's triggered thoughtless, unsophisticated people into the hateful us-against-them viewpoint so many have taken.
12
EruditeIdiotMar 27, 2026
+94
Thank goodness we can finally put an end to transwoman metal streak which consists of…zero medals.
Trans women have been competing at the Olympics for over a decade and have won no metals.
94
Yuukiko_Mar 27, 2026
+47
and a single athlete
47
cholointheskiesMar 27, 2026
+16
Now DSD athletes on the other hand…
16
CarrieDurstMar 27, 2026
+15
Tons of athletes are gonna learn more about themselves
15
PolicyWonkaMar 27, 2026
+7
Who are biologically female and who are explicitly allowed to still participate in the women’s division…
At the end of the day, sometimes you’ve got the genetics to be an elite athlete and sometimes you don’t.
7
Ok-Preference-1681Mar 27, 2026
+27
This ruling bans anyone with the SRY gene and includes people with DSD.
Lin Yu Ting allegedly has a y chromosome, but she doesn't have the SRY gene on it, so she is eligible to compete, Imane Khelif has the SRY gene supposedly so would be banned going forward.
27
PolicyWonkaMar 27, 2026
+1
Straight from the IOC’s announcement:
> XY-DSD athletes with Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome (CAIS) (defined in
Schedule 1) and other rare XY DSDs that do not benefit from the anabolic and/or
performance-enhancing effects of testosterone should, on that basis, be included in the
Female Category.
1
Ok-Preference-1681Mar 27, 2026
+10
Yes, people with androgen insensitivity have effectively a non-functional SRY gene...
most people with DSD don't have CAIS
10
Peripateticdreamer84Mar 27, 2026
+16
That’s not the only intersex condition, and most of these women are only realizing they even are intersex because they advance sufficiently in sports to get their chromosomes tested. Most of them are significantly less clear cut on how it’s expressed as well. Not every DSD shows externally.
16
3rd-party-intervenerMar 27, 2026
+30
Let’s revisit this in one year. And see if healthcare cost have come down , housing is more affordable, etc. then people will realize they got conned on an issue that is basically non existent
30
raised_by_toonamiMar 27, 2026
+15
I’m so glad my trans landlord oil baron has lowered the cost of my groceries. Also props to trans people for overcoming so many struggles to dominate the global economy that keeps me tied to the job I hate so I can afford a middle man to cover my cancer treatments and not be one of the 60% of all bankruptcies that’s due to medical debt.
15
Front_Appointment_68Mar 27, 2026
+22
Not sure what the IOC has to do with any of the things you mentioned?
22
safetydanceMar 27, 2026
+2
First one competed in 2020 (technically 2021 due to covid)
2
SoFLShelfLoveMar 27, 2026
+58
Will this lower gas prices?
58
gd2121Mar 27, 2026
+100
IOC has influence on gas prices?
100
QuigleyPondOverMar 27, 2026
+3
Increased Oil Consumption
IOC
There the whole time!
3
crazylilrikkiMar 27, 2026
+8
Man we've been going after the wrong people this whole time
8
09f3jnsMar 27, 2026
+89
Did you think this decision was an act of Congress?
89
[deleted]Mar 27, 2026
+4
[deleted]
4
09f3jnsMar 27, 2026
+14
The IOC is an international body. How do you think the international community feels about transgender athletes?
14
AsparagusNew3765Mar 27, 2026
+24
>Will this lower gas prices?
So no organisations can do anything unless it lowers gas prices? 😂
24
safetydanceMar 27, 2026
+33
wtf are you talking about?
33
big_daddy_dubMar 27, 2026
+28
Seriously. How does this have so many upvotes?
28
DrFlabbySelfieMar 27, 2026
+8
There are clowns everywhere.
8
hermiona52Mar 27, 2026
+7
This comment is exactly on the same level as Trump requesting the Nobel prize from Norway's government.
7
DrFlabbySelfieMar 27, 2026
+5
Probably not. Maybe we should just go ahead and cancel the Olympics altogether since they won't lower gas prices.
5
Throwaway_567573Mar 27, 2026
+8
Tf does that have to do with the IOC? 😭
8
dontchewspagettiMar 27, 2026
+7
And also cis women with whatever the Olympic body feels is a biological sex disorder.
7
SexuallyConfusedKrabMar 27, 2026
+38
This is 100% being done only because the ‘28 games are going to be in the US.
I also know this thread is going to be swarming with people who barely played HS sports and NARPs who know jack shit about high level competition and athleticism giving their takes about women’s sports while barely watching them at all.
[as a reminder there is very little evidence for advantages of MTF trans people as athletes beyond height and weight.](https://bjsm.bmj.com/content/58/11/586)
38
ENTJragemodeMar 27, 2026
+24
aren't height and weight significant advantages in many sports though? especially if skill levels are similar
24
GarryofRivertonMar 27, 2026
+2
They are, these people just like to lie when they say that trans women have no advantages over cis women.
2
buffalonotbiMar 27, 2026
+1
That study is on sedentary adults, not athletes. Ones on athletes show the expected differences.
1
Sunshroom_FairyMar 27, 2026
+29
Wasn't there literally just a study done that showed trans women had worse physical condition than both cis women and cis men after a few years of HRT? Or am i misremembering?
Also, people operating at an olympic level already has massive genetic advantages to begin with. Including some cis women atheletes having significantly higher testosterone than average.
29
EwenfMar 27, 2026
+41
Yes, transition can lead to reduced muscle mass and lowered oxygen carrying capacity while retaining a larger skeletal frame.
41
rj6553Mar 27, 2026
+32
That study got misrepresented a lot. But it basically suggests that cis women may be slightly advantaged in some categories such as aerobic fitness, but the confidence grade was very low. but also trans women may retain an general advantage in many others (skeletal, lean mass, grip) in comparison to cis women which pretty much disappears when adjusting for hand size.
Pretty much the overall takeaway is that confidence grade is very low, and trans/cis women have comparable physical capabilities.
For people down voting. Here's the full excerpt from the conclusion. Since no-one wants to actually read it before making random claims using it as evidence.
This systematic review and meta-analysis shows transgender women exhibited higher absolute lean mass compared with cisgender women. However, no significant differences in physical fitness metrics (ie, upper-body strength, lower-body strength and VO₂ max) were observed after 1–3 years of therapy. Given
that lean mass and performance data were not necessarily derived from the same cohorts or study designs, direct correlations between muscle mass and functional strength cannot be established.
32
GodsNephewMar 27, 2026
+34
It’s low confidence for many reasons, but there was a specific variable that was not controlled. The trans women in that study were, on average, overweight to obese. While this was not true for the other three categories. Being overweight or obese has similar impacts on athletic performance to the results shown.
That information alone should be enough to immediately pause and consider how to interpret the findings.
34
williamtbashMar 27, 2026
+15
Please stop trying to pretend they’re on the same level.
15
ElephantOwn4201Mar 27, 2026
+10
Finally some sanity has returned
10
engin__rMar 27, 2026
+18
This will hurt women, and not just trans women.
There are going to be a lot of cis women who find out as a result of this testing that they’re intersex. These will be women who were assigned female at birth, who grew up as girls, who everyone treats as women, and who have trained their whole lives for the Olympics.
This sex testing will upend all of that. Some of those women, like Pratima Gaonkar, will take their own lives. Others, like Maria José Martínez Patiño, will “merely” be subject to national or international harassment campaigns.
Even the accusation of being intersex is enough to drag someone through the mud. We saw that happen with Imane Khelif, who had the misfortune of being caught in JK Rowling’s crosshairs.
This is a solution in want of a problem. It’s a huge mistake.
18
GlaitMar 27, 2026
+60
That's the problem when you start trying to define what a cis woman is, it gets complicated fast. Are we going by hormone levels, chromosomes, physical secondary sexual characteristics? That's kinda the cool thing about people is we don't fit into neat perfect little boxes and there is a lot more variations from the "norm" than people think since we aren't routinely testing for these things without cause.
60
TheGriffinMar 27, 2026
+52
There's no functional way to define women without excluding cis women of some kind
52
cholointheskiesMar 27, 2026
+6
The issue seems to be whether one went through male puberty or not. That’s why they made exceptions for DSDs that don’t put one through male puberty
6
Yuukiko_Mar 27, 2026
+43
Everyone knows Algeria is a famously LGBTQ-friendly country /s
43
1egg_4uMar 27, 2026
+28
I was hoping someone would say this, biology is a lot messier than the people trying to validate their bigotry want to believe. Mutations happen, abnormalities happen, people have quirks and I would wager especially at the highest levels of athleticism.
The end result of these kinds of policies based on discrimination that want to jam people into boxes is that not everyone is going to fit their intended box perfectly and now you get cis women who will now going to be told they arent "woman enough for woman club"
Its a means of controlling women and an ambiguous concept of femininity in disguise and convenient idiots take the bait
28
swiftlessonsMar 27, 2026
+39
I doubt “a lot of women” will discover they’re unisex, considering that less than two percent of the human population is born intersex (by the broadest definition of the term) and also only 1 in 500,000 people are olympians. So, what you really mean is “a few, if any at all.”
39
engin__rMar 27, 2026
+21
Two percent is a lot, especially if this gets rolled out to the regional and national leagues that feed into the Olympics.
21
Tube_WarmerMar 27, 2026
+14
He misspoke, its not 2%. Its 0.028%. And no, 2% of 4 billion people is not a lot. Or, are you saying that because 2% of people are born with more or less than two legs, we cant classify human beings as bipedal?
This is a silly argument.
14
SteamcurlMar 27, 2026
+4
Except that women with intersex conditions are waaaay more numerous in elite sport than the general population:
140 Times Higher Prevalence: According to World Athletics (formerly IAAF) and data published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine, the prevalence of DSD athletes with high testosterone levels in elite women’s athletics is roughly 140 times higher than in the general female population.
4
SliceIkaMar 27, 2026
+16
Hurt women? Lol no biological women wants a biological man to compete in women sports.
16
rita-bMar 27, 2026
+2
You will be tested while competing on junior level, I suppose. No need to create an international news then. Or you are saying we should not be dna-tested ever in fear of finding our bio sex? You can plan a kid and discover you are xxy as well., etc
Imane Khelif became the topic of discussion when her multiple sparring partners questioned the source of her **unusual** strength, not when Rowling decided to twit something.
I absolutely see no other solution ever possible. If anything, it could be a voting among all active female athletes. I doubt the results of voting will be different. I doubt Imane Khelif sparring partners wanted her on the ring or that **their feelings should be valued less just because they don't have a y chromosome**
2
[deleted]Mar 27, 2026
+11
[removed]
11
Amalgam2001Mar 27, 2026
+5
Some actual level of sanity returns. The normal average person will never agree with trans woman being in woman sports. Its an extremely polarizing topic and I doubt you will ever be able to convince people on it
5
monorelsMar 27, 2026
+9
The title is misleading.
It should actually read like this:
People with male bodies are banned from competing against people with female bodies because it gives them an unfair advantage.
This, by the way, is the reason why there are separate competitions for men and women.
9
fatcatpartytimeMar 27, 2026
+3
So a female athlete who went through female puberty but has intersex chromosomes is no longer able to compete even if her hormone levels are normal — please explain how that’s is fair?
Sports exalt genetic exceptionalism constantly — height, lung capacity, etc etc but all of a sudden it’s a problem if women don’t meet a very narrow definition of “woman.”
Do we want exceptional people being exceptional or do we want a narrow idea of what it means to be human?
3
monorelsMar 27, 2026
+7
Of course, this is a topic for debate, because, for example, in sports,
there are also weight qualifications for many events.
But, in fact, this is the reason for the division between men's and women's sports –
because it is precisely this difference in human bodies that is the most noticeable difference
in the physical qualities of athletes:
[https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7930971/](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7930971/)
So, instead of a complex set of parameters like lung capacity or height,
athletes are simply divided into those with male and female bodies.
And they compete in these categories.
There are undoubtedly women who are stronger than the average man
and men who are weaker than the average woman.
But in Olympic sports, victory is now decided by hundredths of a second or millimeters.
For curiosity's sake, you can look at women's and men's world records.
And if unfair competition is allowed, abuses will immediately begin.
There are plenty of examples of this.
This isn't a philosophical issue, it's a technical limitation.
Nothing's stopping you from founding your own Olympic movement,
where everyone competes against everyone else.
But it seems to me that even then you'll have to exploit technical limitations
simply because the world isn't perfect.
7
[deleted]Mar 27, 2026
+3
[removed]
3
MrBundy22Mar 27, 2026
+7
Good this should be common sense
7
BigHeadDeadassMar 27, 2026
+6
ITT no one knows what hormone replacement therapy does nor understand the rigorous and strict testing for hormone levels athletes go through to compete. Also funny how this singularly targets MtF trans people. By the logic of the committee, FtM athletes, brimming with testosterone, have to compete with women. Funny how when discussing trans people trans men are always left out. Funnier still is the timing of this. It's been a non-issue for 20 years and suddenly they decide to reverse the decision. Gee I eonder what changed politically
6
dog_of_societyMar 27, 2026
+12
Trans men often just get banned completely if they've medically transitioned, because testosterone counts as doping by their rules. Source, I'm a trans man.
But yeah, they don't usually give a singular shit about us in the media. Guess it's inconvenient to their narrative that they're arguing for us to use women's bathrooms (read: be effectively banned from public restrooms).
12
Master-Rent5050Mar 27, 2026
+13
"No woman who transitioned from being born male competed at the 2024 Paris Summer Games, though weightlifter Laurel Hubbard did at the Tokyo Olympics in 2021 without winning a medal."
13
SheenPSUMar 27, 2026
+5
It’s pretty straight forward actually considering it’s a one way issue affecting women’s athletics
FtM athletes don’t dominate their competition like the MtF athletes do
5
DingerSinger2016Mar 27, 2026
+7
MtF athletes don't dominate their competition. They rarely qualify for the Olympics, and they haven't ever medalled.
7
sokrateszMar 27, 2026
+4
Do they? How many Olympic medals have mtf athletes won?
4
CoyoteAdmirable8512Mar 27, 2026
+10
Good. The Olympics will be fair.
10
dumbasstupidbabyMar 27, 2026
+8
Where are the Epstein files?
8
YohnWood14Mar 27, 2026
+29
How’s that related to the Olympics? Did Trump order the IOC to do this? Not everything is about the US
29
alftimMar 27, 2026
+4
Finally common sense and justice prevails
4
thomas_walker65Mar 27, 2026
+6
solving a problem that never existed in the first place
6
rita-bMar 27, 2026
+2
Why every sub wants to victimize transgenders? This rule is about any y-chromosome bearer
2
[deleted]Mar 27, 2026
+2
[removed]
2
teddy1245Mar 27, 2026
+2
But they didn’t. Also does this mean trans men can’t compete with men? Or does no one care about that?
2
KnockclodMar 27, 2026
+1
A win for women, actual women, who dream of winning a gold medal one day
1
CrazyDisastrous948Mar 27, 2026
+3
Hormones change people's body, including muscles and bone density. Everyone supporting this knows nothing about hormone replacement therapy or how it works.
200 Comments