Trump specifically mentioned terrorists when announcing this.
Right after convicting 8 U.S. citizens on totally bogus terrorism charges.
They want to kill us for protesting/dissenting.
https://apnews.com/article/prairieland-detention-center-shooting-antifa-trial-5650d9c3db0592671a1d5b5b27a47d2d
Edit typo
Edit II to add link
797
Usual-Caregiver55899 hr ago
+312
Should be noted that in 1953, when we overthrew the Iranian government and installed Pahlavi (the Shah) as its new leader, he proceeded to execute dissidents and more than 80,000 people were killed because of it. This is why Iran shouts "Death to America".
And Trump wants to *be* him.
312
Jesus_Is_My_Gardener9 hr ago
+37
How long before we get another Kent State?
37
JohnBrownSurvivor9 hr ago
+179
Have you been paying attention? We've had several Kent States worth of murders already.
179
ShadowNick8 hr ago
-161
ICE is the national guard?
-161
427BananaFish8 hr ago
+115
Yes, ICE is a militarized federally sanctioned security force that, like the National Guard at Kent State, was charged with quelling protests and ended up murdering American citizens on American soil.
115
Least-Worth-86348 hr ago
+36
I can't really see a difference
36
slimdiesel937 hr ago
+2
One has killed people for the thrill and fun, the other out of fear and anxiety
2
ShadowNick7 hr ago
-1
I don't think the National Guard in Kent did it out of fear.
-1
slimdiesel937 hr ago
+1
I wasn't there but in no way could they have been more enthusiastic than ICE. There are at least standards and training in the national guard and most people I'm aware of that sign up aren't doing it so they can harass people.
There is no training or standards in ICE, and most of the people it seems that apply enjoy every bit of brown shirting around. I also can't anecdotaly why someone would join ICE because nobody I know or associate with has done it or admits it
1
Flame_MadeByHumans6 hr ago
+1
Your assessment of the National Guard today vs 60 years ago and anectdotes about personal connections can’t really do justice to the setting of Kent State.
There’s plenty of people in every level and branch of the military that are undisciplined and joined for more than just a respectful duty of the country. The National Guard going into Kent State was victim to the same rhetoric today that the protestors are agitators and going to cause real harm.
More than anything, both ICE today and the National Guard then’s actions and killings of American citizens was a mixture of both fear/anxiety (due to propaganda and the government labelling protestors as bad) AND bad actors within both that are trigger-happy.
1
ShadowNick8 hr ago
-43
State national guard and Federal Agents. There's no difference at all?
-43
Sit_Ubu_Sit-Good_Dog8 hr ago
+21
You see a difference between which one kills civilians?
21
JohnBrownSurvivor8 hr ago
+15
Next you're going to be trying to make a distinction between what proportion of them were wearing black socks on any given day. Y'all trolls really really need to up your game.
This is the kind of distinction without a difference that gets you mocked right off of the third grade playground. Let alone not taken seriously when it comes to history and national politics.
15
ShadowNick7 hr ago
+1
Thanks for calling me a troll. Ohio Governor James A. Rhodes deployed the national guard not the federal government at Kent. The Gestapos aka ICE are being deployed by the fed government because they know all their new hires which are just Proud Boys and Jan 6th goons are finally able to fulfill their life long dream of shooting someone and getting away with it. And will gladly do anything their ordered to shoot.
Not trying to be factitious but I'd hope that National Guards people of today would go yeah I'm not gonna go shoot protestors considering their role even when ordered to. Again I'd hope.
1
cycopl7 hr ago
+1
I like your optimism. An old friend of mine was in guard and is the most MAGA person I know. Probably would shoot protestors given the opportunity. Haven’t exchanged more than a dozen or so words with him over the last decade but I still hear about his exploits from other friends. Anecdotal I know.
1
tedlyb7 hr ago
+6
Really? This is what you’re going with?
6
myjobistablesok8 hr ago
+4
State national guards can and do become federalized.
4
Least-Worth-86348 hr ago
+5
Not when they are both killing innocent American citizens 🤷
5
ARoroncyObserver6 hr ago
+1
"They're the same picture" meme.
1
Dk17246 hr ago
+1
I'm uninformed on the convicted terrorism charges, can you supply a link to further reading on it?
Firing squads are preferred in military situations and when one has to dispose of many prisoners. Just saying.
1
Ready-Ad61139 hr ago
+237
The next democrat president has the opportunity to do the funniest thing.
237
but_good8 hr ago
+55
Pay per view. Please.
55
threenil7 hr ago
+34
Just like Charlie Kirk would have wanted.
34
Suspicious_Story_4647 hr ago
+1
I hear there is a space for rent. Used to be a rose garden.
1
theLULRUS8 hr ago
+31
May he not live that long.
31
WhileCultchie6 hr ago
+1
[ Removed by Listnook ]
1
York_Villain7 hr ago
+22
That's nice to daydream about but the truth is they won't do shit. Not a damn thing.
22
Ready-Ad61137 hr ago
+1
Trumps setting the standard. If Trump can’t get impeached and convicted no president can. What crimes need to be committed to be removed from office then? Republicans are creating the framework for an even worse politician and assume a democrat wont retaliate or use the same tactics Trump did because of a political stereotype. (Watch them panic after midterms and in 2028)
The Supreme Court gave the president immunity for “official acts”. They could theoretically execute political opponents under the guise of “national security” or arrest people with bogus treason charges with how easily the justice department can be weaponized. The courts also have no enforcement mechanism.
We need massive reforms in the Supreme Court and some new amendments to restrict the presidents powers and eliminate corruption if we want to repair our government.
1
mohammedgoldstein7 hr ago
+1
Trump is the president of unintended consequences. PUC.
1
ZyronZA10 hr ago
+292
Can we please call it what it really is?
Its a regime. A fascist regime.
292
Sad-Excitement92959 hr ago
+44
Treason is a high crime.
44
fuzzy_one8 hr ago
+11
… and a shit ton of misdemeanors
11
Geth_8 hr ago
+11
"I may have committed some... *light* treason."
11
pk23177 hr ago
+1
"...I've made a huge mistake."
1
crookdmouth7 hr ago
+1
It's locked room treason or crazy uncle treason.
1
Geth_7 hr ago
+1
Mine was a reference to a famous quote from Arrested Development. I don't know what this is or what it's from.
1
crookdmouth7 hr ago
+1
I guess a bad joke about Trump explaining away sexual assault.
1
Mediocre-Program30447 hr ago
+1
I might be down for a little treason.
But only on Tuesdays.☝️
I sometimes mutiny on Mondays, so I'd like to keep that option open.
I haven't missed a Walk Out Wednesday in years. I've kinda got the ongoing record. A few times I woke up late, looked at the calendar and got myself in motion so fast that I didn't realize it was upside down. So I also hold the record number of times a single person has ever walked out mutinies.
"F*** you" Fridays, are just for "Me" time.
The various ways in which I have (and almost most certainly will) engage in sexual intercourse with, or within my local TGI Friday's... are always dynamic and evolving acts of sexual violence... with... some selection bias.
Saturdays and Sundays are sometimes for secrets, so come down at night, knock 33 times, and speak the following phrase:
"Sunday surprise! Monday Mutiny!"
✊️
*Edit*
Removed confusing text. 👀
1
amakai7 hr ago
+8
Well, yeah. Third of country is fascists in denial, makes sense they elected a fascist.
8
A_N_T7 hr ago
+1
I've been doing that for over a year, where have you been?
1
threenil7 hr ago
+15
The pro-life party, everyone.
15
NoBrain15069 hr ago
+48
It’s great timing for the midterms coming up in November as the Democrats plan on impeaching Trump on day one. Trump could be Exhibit A!
48
hutsunuwu8 hr ago
+15
I only want him impeached if there is a waiting police cruiser to take him from the White House straight to Alligator Alcatraz. Outside of that, I want him to stay in office and be a true lame duck for the remainder of his presidency. Let him have a taste of what they did to Obama in his last 2 years. Let him claim the mantel of power while being utterly powerless. That is a worse punishment for a man like Trump than removing him from his seat of power. Not to mention that would save us from getting Peter Thiel Jr. as president
15
TadpoleOfDoom8 hr ago
+17
Unfortunately that's still a punishment to America. No, impeaching him would be way better. He's truly powerless and the rotten democrats win in his mind.
17
ccarr3137 hr ago
+1
So how do you plan on flipping the supreme court?
Seems like you're forgetting how much the fascists actually control currently. And also forgetting how f****** weak Dems are.
I don't think they will successfully impeach him at all, even if they take both chambers. And if they did, he would probably laugh at them and tie it up in courts until his term ends.
1
Niceromancer6 hr ago
+1
Easy you ignore scotus.
It's happened in the past.
Scotus has no power of enforcement.
1
The_Vee_8 hr ago
+13
We can't easily get the drugs anymore for capital punishment. If there's one thing the US has, it's bullets.
13
Sorry-Climate-798210 hr ago
+58
Well, I guess that is one way to deal with illegal arrests and imprisonments--destroy the evidence before it can sue you.
58
Slouchingtowardsbeth9 hr ago
+27
War not going so well. I'm surprised he hasn't announced public hangings.
27
calmlikeabomb269 hr ago
+1
[ Removed by Listnook ]
1
VirtuaFighter69 hr ago
+10
Convicted child sex offender, Ghislaine Noelle Marion Maxwell, you’re up.
10
MaygarRodub8 hr ago
+7
She'll be pardoned.
7
Alive_Internet7 hr ago
+1
They can’t. If they pardon her, the Republicans are going to throw away all their midterm and 2028 election chances.
1
Piney_Wood7 hr ago
+1
I remember when I thought overturning Roe would accomplish that.
1
Niceromancer6 hr ago
+1
The Republicans on the house oversight committee are considering pardoning her.
1
Niceromancer6 hr ago
+1
The Republicans on the house oversight committee are considering granting her a pardon.
I wish I was kidding.
1
Broccobillo7 hr ago
+1
America is a fascist state.
1
Former_Base_106610 hr ago
+65
One more step toward the gas chambers. F*** this timeline
65
zanderkirk10 hr ago
+35
Gas chambers are already a legal method of execution. All they need to do is cram more than one of us in there...
35
Saurian429 hr ago
+9
Supposedly they already installed incinerators in the camps ICE uses.
9
forsuresies8 hr ago
+14
Which says something about the contractors who installed them, the companies that accepted the contracts, the suppliers who supplied the equipment.
Anyways anyone catch the convection of a 90 year old secretary from a camp a few years ago? Enabling genocide is also a crime, that will get you pursued for 70+ years legally, if the roving cleanup squads don't catch you first after this all ends. Power eventually shifts
14
DingerSinger20167 hr ago
+4
>Anyways anyone catch the convection of a 90 year old secretary from a camp a few years ago? Enabling genocide is also a crime, that will get you pursued for 70+ years legally, if the roving cleanup squads don't catch you first after this all ends. Power eventually shifts
Yeah that's good and all but there were a shitton more people who got away with being in the Nazi regime without any consequences.
4
FluxKraken8 hr ago
+20
I will be honest, if we are going to execute someone, this is more humane than pumping them full of lethal chemicals that take a while to work. This is instant death.
That being said, the government shouldn’t have thebpower to execute anyone at all.
20
AccountantRound26818 hr ago
+6
If I remember correctly, the news reported a condemned prisoner requested a firing squad execution recently. Perhaps in part this legislation is a response to that event.
6
sound_of_apocalypto8 hr ago
+3
You’ve summed up my viewpoint.
3
galaapplehound7 hr ago
+8
This. If I were told I had to die a bullet to the head by a sharpshooter at point blank range that will kill me instantly is way better than a cocktail of unknown drugs pumped into me hoping I'd die.
The death penalty should be abolished entirely but if they're going to use it the bullet is a better option.
8
Piney_Wood7 hr ago
+1
It won't be a sharpshooter. It'll be a gang of jittery overweight weekend warriors.
1
Niceromancer6 hr ago
+1
They don't waste sharp shooters on firing squads it's low ranking people.
Dumb mother f***** romanticizing something that we abandoned cause it wasn't effective.
1
allothernamestaken6 hr ago
+1
Firing squads don't shoot at the head, they shoot at the chest (aiming for the heart). Still probably pretty quick.
1
EntropySimian6 hr ago
+1
Seems like people romanticize a firing squad. There's not an executioner with a hand gun, inches from a head, it's a lineup at target practice distance. Maybe they'll set a new standard, but historically the squad aimed for the heart.
1
Niceromancer6 hr ago
+1
You have zero idea how lethal injections work.
One of the chemicals in tye cocktail knocks the person unconscious.
Turn you just stop breathing.
Vs being shot, which is painfull then if it's not instantly lethal you slowly had painfully bleed out.
1
RookNookLook6 hr ago
+1
So funny story, when I was a kid we were learning about the death penalty and there was a lil map in our textbook that had which states did what, and I think Louisiana was the only one that still had the firing squad.
So I mention to the class that‘s the option I would chose, and everyone else gasped haha.
1
OldGeezerOGTM10 hr ago
+44
Sounds like Nazi Germany.
44
Politicsboringagain9 hr ago
+22
Nazi Germany did learn some of its eugenics practices from the US anti Black racist, laws, bullshit sciences.
22
fleebleganger8 hr ago
-2
As if a squeaky clean USA prevents the atrocities of the third reich.
-2
ItemEven64218 hr ago
+12
The death penalty is cruel and unusual
12
Tdb7139 hr ago
+17
Nothing says you’re pro-life like firing squads.
17
DataCassette9 hr ago
+11
Who is sitting around in their trailer park asking for this shit? It's completely random. I think the death penalty is already the death penalty. This is purely because the knuckledragger demo votes for ritual bloodlust.
11
Starbreaker998 hr ago
+12
Sure. But its also going to be used against us. Label protestors as terrorist, mass incarceration, then executions.
12
Ok_Matter_26177 hr ago
+1
Read Facebook comments & you’ll see these psychopaths want this
1
DataCassette7 hr ago
+1
Yes. *THEY DO* absolutely. But the core MAGA coalition is not viable with zero swing voters and all opposition energized and angry.
1
LengthClean7 hr ago
+1
All you educated forward thinking Americans are welcome up here in Canada. We don’t despise you, we despise the 51st rhetoric enablers and the current admin.
1
robustofilth7 hr ago
+3
It would be hilarious if the current administration all ended up facing a firing squad 🤣
3
Fit-Let81757 hr ago
+3
Trump may not be the bad guy many of us thought he might be. He actually may be worse.
3
Hamstaaboy9 hr ago
+7
Americans do love their guns.
7
Limabean25126 hr ago
+1
I am not against capital punishment and I am pro choice. I am laughing a little bit though this is coming from a pro life administration
Edit: not CP outside of lethal injection
1
bpronjon8 hr ago
+4
Save the Big Cheese a spot in line.
4
Bad_breath8 hr ago
+4
I guess firing squads are better than lethal injections, electric chairs or gas..?
4
clamdigger7 hr ago
+1
Holy f***, these people are barbarians
1
Possible_Ground_96868 hr ago
+2
Firing squads are more humane than lethal injection
2
Unite-Us-34038 hr ago
+1
When do they plan to execute those who remain on federal death row? Didn’t Trump say he would execute people there swiftly?
1
moss_field_journal8 hr ago
+1
Bringing back firing squads in 2020 like we’re speedrunning the worst parts of history. At minimum, every state should have an automatic review panel for wrongful convictions before any execution happens.
1
KE557 hr ago
+1
He'll be selling spectators' seats next. And rich MAGA gun nuts can pay to pull the trigger...
1
tehCharo7 hr ago
+1
And then accuses Obama of treason... What are they planning?
1
TheWolfbytez7 hr ago
+1
The firing squad for Trump would attract billions of views worldwide, why deprive the free market of such entertainment?
1
grilledscheese7 hr ago
+1
i think the death penalty is abhorrent in all cases and evidence of the deep barbarism at the heart of american culture, but that said, given how f****** awful their chemical based methods are said to be both for victim and observer, this is at least a more certain method that should reduce unnecessary suffering.
1
Fancy_Possibility4567 hr ago
+1
Trump should have to be the one to pull the trigger. Gotta feel the weight of these decisions
1
ironworkerlocal5777 hr ago
+1
You mean push the trigger, with his toe?
1
guttanzer7 hr ago
+1
Meh. By summer they’re going to be calling for public hangings. By fall, crucifixions.
Cruelty is the point.
1
BeeComprehensive52347 hr ago
+1
Lying politicians should go first.
1
cribsaw7 hr ago
+1
A finger on the monkey paw curls. This is how members of the Trump Administration are dealt with when this is all over.
1
Phreekai7 hr ago
+1
Ehh...more humane than lethal injection, which has a not insignificant failure rate.
1
RenamedAccount1855167 hr ago
+1
How about a firing squad for child rapists? I think that the FBI currently has a bunch of files on billionaires who trafficked and raped children.
1
leaonas7 hr ago
+1
Just like Hitler. Soon it will be marching naked prisoner over to a pit, shoot them in the back of the head, and then bulldoze dirt over the heap of dead bodies. He’s jerking off to the idea.
1
Dull-Dance-36157 hr ago
+1
Careful what you wish for.
1
JTalbotIV7 hr ago
+1
Just in time for him to die, and all his cronies to lose the legal protections...
1
Acrobatic_Club23827 hr ago
+1
Great. This would apply to pedophiles right?
1
Xyro777 hr ago
+1
The method of death brought back is irrelevant. The only thing that needs to change is how frequently it’s used.
1
_TallOldOne_7 hr ago
+1
Well someday soon they (the Trump administration) won’t be in power in anymore and subject to the laws of this nation and therefore prosecutable.
So I support this decision.
1
huebomont7 hr ago
+1
Ok honestly firing squad is the only way we should do executions.
Obviously Trump is bringing them back because he thinks it’s super tough and violent so no credit there.
But it’s the most humane - you’ll die immediately before feeling much, unlike the “calm” looking drug cocktails we give people that create paralysis and terrible pain for minutes.
And the people doing it don’t get the option to feel like they’re doing something clinical and nonviolent. If you’re going to be an executioner for the state you should accept that you are murdering people and if you don’t think that’s something you want to be doing or don’t trust it’s for a good reason you shouldn’t do it. Having to shoot a person does that.
Firing squads are the only way for us to both be humane and honest about what capital punishment is.
1
O-parker6 hr ago
+1
Resident Rump tries each day to reach a new level of low
1
Samurai56M6 hr ago
+1
If you have good shots, and people who are mentally fit enough to be on the squad, a firing squad is actually much more humane then lethal injection or electrocution. Its quicker, almost instant, the person being executed feels no pain because of how instant it is. Im not aure why people are calling this out as barbaric, as its actually one of the most humane and considerate versions of execution.
1
SueSudio8 hr ago
Firing squad is more humane than many of the other death penalty procedures we currently use.
0
Essex1157 hr ago
+3
This is not the comment you want to make
3
SueSudio7 hr ago
+1
Why? It’s the truth. Abolishing the death penalty would be preferable, but if we have one it should be as humane as possible.
1
Awesomedinos18 hr ago
+2
There is no humane death penalty.
2
SueSudio7 hr ago
+1
Firing squad is the lesser evil of the current methods in place. Hiding from that fact or pretending otherwise just leaves a more inhumane procedure in place.
1
aimlessnameless8 hr ago
+1
Is their first task to execute Trump & his terrorist regime?
1
hellbunny8 hr ago
-1
Not being funny, but I've always wondered why America - which is famously pro-gun - doesn't execute people like this? Like, if you've made the decision that it's okay for the state to kill some people, to a certain degree the method doesn't matter all that much, and with such prevalent gun culture - why not use them for this? What's the historical argument against?
-1
Briebird448 hr ago
+9
It not the firing squad that’s necessarily the problem, it’s the death penalty itself considering innocent people get jailed ALL THE TIME.
9
MaygarRodub8 hr ago
+2
But this post is about firing squads, not execution itself.
2
hellbunny7 hr ago
+1
Oh I get that (and am very much against the death penalty in general) - but once you've crossed that moral line it just seems strange that the US suddenly feels a bit icky about something that seems core to American identity.
1
possiblecurb8 hr ago
+2
It's traumatic for the people that have to execute the accused. It's also not the most efficient, with human error and empathy, shooters will miss or shoot to maim. It's hard to find a polite way to murder someone.
2
SnuffleWarrior8 hr ago
Line Trump up on the wall and I'm all in
0
SnoozingBasset9 hr ago
-8
If there is capital punishment that is reasonable swift, what difference does the method make?
-8
OldLondon8 hr ago
+3
It’s not guaranteed instant death I’d suggest
3
MaygarRodub8 hr ago
Neither is lethal injection. There have been many mistakes.
0
OldLondon6 hr ago
+1
Yes, capital punishment is barbaric and should be banned globally.
131 Comments