"We didn't need them, but they didn't come and we're very frustrated, but we absolutely didn't need them, and we won, but they could have helped, but not really, and I never asked them to help, but they should have helped, but they were never needed".
5868
The_Corvair2 days ago
+3126
The fact that this is a pretty damn accurate representation of the state of affairs, and that the originator of that trainwreck of a concept of a thought *still* sits in the Oval Office instead of a 24/7 nursing home, is proof positive that the US is so fucked that the words to accurately reflect that have yet to be invented.
3126
GingerSoulEater412 days ago
+920
Not nursing home.
Jail cell
920
recumbent_mike2 days ago
+134
I know jail is too much to ask - but I've seen nursing homes. I'm willing to settle.
134
Triedfindingname2 days ago
+74
As long as it is one that is publicly funded and represents a lower middle class setting.
74
TheGreatPornholio1232 days ago
+42
Preferably in a deep-red GOP state with a failing rural hospital system that balked on any Obamacare money to "own the libs," even though it'll just get redirected to another state...so Tennessee is in play.
42
DonkeyTron422 days ago
+18
I would settle for house arrest at this point. Anything that gets this senile cockwomble out of power will be a positive move for the world.
18
The_Corvair2 days ago
+208
That's where he should have been for the last decade, roughly. At least. But the US instead gave him their highest office, and staffed it with yes-men (and women) in every branch of government. But now he's *also* grown actually demented to a degree where keeping him in power has become an actual threat to the entire world.
I'd absolutely love to see him in jail, once he's out of office, and properly adjudicated for the crimes he already has been convicted of. But let's start with getting him out of office, first.
208
HopeThisIsUnique2 days ago
+14
Given his mental state I'm sure you could use the latter and convince him it was the former.
14
[deleted]2 days ago
+66
[removed]
66
[deleted]2 days ago
+16
[removed]
16
Professor_Eindackel2 days ago
+8
They are in for a shock 72 hours later.
8
PsyavaIG2 days ago
+17
Iron Maiden so its the last lady he touches
17
dragnansdragon2 days ago
+10
My only beef is an iron maiden would be too metal for such a b****.
10
Procrasturbating2 days ago
+41
I would settle for coffin. GO TEAM CHOLESTEROL!
41
Oerthling2 days ago
+52
For the sake of the US it would be much better if he gets democratically removed from office.
If he just dies then it's random save for no reason. The sorry state of affairs that got him into office would remain unchallenged.
It would be much better for American democracy if his removal is a deliberate act.
52
gemusevonaldi2 days ago
+13
I would even add that it seems that everybody is waiting for his death so they wouldn't have to do anything about it. In my opinion, America might be in way worse situation if there are no consequences to Trump's actions.
13
NoShitsGivin2 days ago
+5
Sure, jail is nice. But who is going to hold him accountable?
5
Eyehopeuchoke2 days ago
+39
The fact that a president can withdrawal from nato and then the next president can spend their time trying to undo all the dumb shit the previous president has done is crazy to me. These are long term agreements and shit and we let some shit bag make decisions to f*** up years and years of work is f****** nuts.
39
Vechio492 days ago
+46
The President can't withdrawal from NATO
46
Icy-Ad-77672 days ago
+22
Agreed since it now takes a an act of congress and it will never pass a filibuster
22
PresentRaspberry68142 days ago
+22
Quite a few things the President has no authority to do that the President has gone ahead and done.
22
andreasmodugno2 days ago
+8
...instead of a 24/7 prison cell...
8
htownmidtown12 days ago
+217
His speeches the past week or 2 included talks about NATO (he wasn’t remotely asked about it) and so he’s been trying to do this. In fact, he’s been trying to destroy NATO during his first term. Hrmmmmm. I wonder why. Hrmmmmm. Such a mystery 🙄
217
robilar2 days ago
+109
"We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia" - Trump Jr
109
RealJembaJemba2 days ago
+45
We really need to have _much_ stricter requirements to be president. You couldn’t land a job at walmart with the shit this guys pulled, yet a man bought and owned by every evil foreign government with a checking account can be the “ruler of the free world”
45
robilar2 days ago
+4
For every layer of government. But let's be real: the people that would be setting those requirements are the people that shouldn't have those positions. A psychopath isn't going to make a good babysitter.
4
htownmidtown12 days ago
+9
That whole administration… ugh. I strongly suggest to people who are now 18-30yo look back and research it. It’s all historical and factual. They might think they lived it but unless you were an adult and living on your own with without college and Covid to distract you and shit…….
When Paul Ryan and the Tea Party passed their huge tax bill they dipped out or gelled into whatever this shit is, Russia be damned. We had McCain save the Affordable Care Act in dramatic fashion.
The pass of the BBB? Yeah those people are staying. That grift is solid.
I’m 36 with chronic back pain and I am so fucked.
9
No_Criticism_58612 days ago
+4
He did more damage to NATO in his first year in 2nd term than Putin ever has. Threatening to invade Canada constantly and Greenland. Just insane
4
saulsa_2 days ago
+128
I’m not 100%, but this feels like it could be a direct quote.
128
IntelArtiGen2 days ago
+128
It's almost a direct quote, I'm really serious: https://x.com/clashreport/status/2039467412081299646
> "TBH I was really asking because I wanted to see what they'd do, we didn't need them" [we won blabla] "but we didn't need them, but I asked them anyway"
128
Xfuck1tX2 days ago
+8
JFC. I hate this f****** timeline.
8
unabashed_nuance2 days ago
+19
I just assumed this was a real quote.
19
wintersdark2 days ago
+10
It almost is; the real quote is longer but says the same thing.
https://x.com/clashreport/status/2039467412081299646 (credit OP)
10
ZeroMocha2 days ago
+12
“And they blamed me! For protecting them…from the threat. I opened the strait. I brought peace. I brokered the ceasefire and won. I won on day one. DJT”
12
magwai92 days ago
+6
[Make Arcadia Great Again!](https://youtu.be/S6_Bqdfjwbc?si=JfI2-1gsJac0XY7d)
6
RedofPaw2 days ago
+538
"Oh my, I don't WANT to leave NATO, but gosh darn it you just kinda forced me to do it. What's that, vlad? Join Russia in a defense pact? Well, I don't know, it would be a hard decision, but yes, okay, sir."
538
Shaitan342 days ago
+119
"Since we share a border, it just makes sense"
119
takeda642 days ago
+84
I like The Onion giving pros and cons of US leaving NATO and the first pros was "U.S. can finally join Warsaw Pact"
https://theonion.com/pros-and-cons-of-u-s-withdrawing-from-nato/
As you pointed out it's extremely stupid move for America, even if he only wanted to leave because he can't use NATO as personal army, withdrawing from NATO also means that those bases in Europe will be closed. It means US no longer will have global reach.
This is why I think he is a Russian agent, or maybe just extremely dumb person surrounded by agents.
84
JCDU1 day ago
+14
The question is always: what would a Russian asset do differently?
Usually the answer is "not much" or even "they'd be a lot more f****** discreet about it".
14
MerlinsMentor2 days ago
+25
> "Oh my, I don't WANT to leave NATO, but gosh darn it you just kinda forced me to do it. What's that, vlad? Join Russia ~~in a defense pact~~ *as a vassal*? Well, I don't know, it would be a hard decision, but yes, okay, sir."
25
RobinsonDL2 days ago
+1692
Trump administration can't withdraw from NATO unless 2/3 of congress approves. Marco Rubio brought it for vote and won. No president can withdraw without 2/3 of congress.
1692
RealRroseSelavy2 days ago
+817
US can't withdraw but can ignore any request concerning article 5.
which they would do anyways under NATO hating trumpler.
817
derkrieger2 days ago
+365
Would the US military ignore an obvious triggering of article 5 is the question? A bunch of generals went and spoke with other NATO generals in Denmark without Trump, aka the adults were talking.
365
DevilahJake2 days ago
+375
Kegsbreath is removing people that are most likely to push back on his idiotic orders, so that he can install loyalists.
375
htownmidtown12 days ago
+70
The loyalists have been there since 1/20/25 because they are not making the same mistake as last time minus a few.
70
leg_day2 days ago
+24
The christian nationalist loyalists have been in military leadership _long_ before they anointed a populist racist as their messiah.
24
permalink_save2 days ago
+37
DOJ and DOD need to be fully independent of the president. They should require 2/3 majority in congress to install the heads or hell, loop the house into it. It shouldn't even be vetoable by the president, having that single person choke point puts the whole process in a huge conflict of interest.
37
Dependent_Survey_5462 days ago
+41
Don't think the military can make that decision on their own?
Edit - legally speaking
41
goldflame332 days ago
+24
Yeah, it’s one thing to refuse illegal orders, it’s another for some generals to decide to issue the orders they think they should have received from the President.
Also, regardless of what Trump does, if Russia tried to invade Poland or something Congress could just declare war, considering the constitution explicitly sets that aside as their power
24
phoenixmusicman2 days ago
+21
>something Congress could just declare war
Would they, though?
21
TyrusX2 days ago
+12
They would not
12
Taellosse2 days ago
+26
The rule of law was dealt a lethal blow 2 years ago. Everything since has been watching while it bleeds out.
26
mewalkyne2 days ago
+66
Article 5's language is "such action as it deems necessary", which means doing nothing is a legitimate action if that's what they choose is deemed necessary.
66
ahuramazdobbs192 days ago
+19
Yeah. Article 5 does not mandate or obligate any specific course of action to a member state in support of another.
Let’s say Grenada managed to launch an attack on the USA (in this hypothetical it’s a US that isn’t Trumpist and isn’t threatening NATO partners themselves).
NATO members are not in this sense obligated to throw their full individual military might against Grenada. The US would be more than capable of addressing this threat with just a fraction of their power; it doesn’t need Lithuania or Slovenia to add some troops in.
Now let’s say it’s…Iran attacking Türkiye.
That becomes a much different scenario.
19
RealRroseSelavy2 days ago
+11
if only the adults in the US would have the guts to withstand trumpler. but with loyalists in critical command positions i doubt US would handle anything better than their self inflicted war-pains
11
TheSleepyTruth2 days ago
+5
Uniformed service members of the US military cannot act unilaterally without authorization from SECDEF and/or POTUS. Typically, under normal circumstances, thats a good thing. You dont want Generals going rogue. If any General tried to join a war in a foreign country based on their own desires that would be insane and basically a de facto attempt at a military coup.They would be immediately fired and likely imprisoned.
5
raikou19882 days ago
+16
These "adults" you are talking about voted for 🥭🤡 all three times and will advocate for a 3rd term
16
Fluffcake2 days ago
+5
Yes.
Generals are there to turn rambling into action, civilian leadership decide what actions.
And the civilian leadership is compromised, to put it mildly.
5
anillop2 days ago
+7
Congress can declare war if they choose to.
7
Darth_Nox5012 days ago
+6
Congress can't agree on what colors make up the American flag.
They'll never vote on a formal declaration of war.
6
Tribalbob2 days ago
+17
Something ironic about the only country to invoke article 5 ignoring article 5.
17
poppin-n-sailin2 days ago
+100
Lol I keep hearing and seeing people say "trump cant do... the USA cant...." but then they keep doing it anyway. its been over a year, and still there are people like you saying this. figure it out yet?
100
Notwerk2 days ago
+251
Haven't seen Congress stop his stupid shit once, so no reason to think they'll step in now
251
auradex9912 days ago
+118
This exactly. We have been saying for 5 years now that "this is the line".
It. never. is.
Congress is nothing but a bunch of spineless sycophants.
118
htownmidtown12 days ago
+9
5 years? 9 years and counting
9
The_Bitter_Bear2 days ago
+22
It would be like a lot of his other shit. Congress won't do anything to stop him but he also won't be able to really make it happen.
He'd "declare it" or issue an executive order and his base would cheer for it, FOX would run it for a while and such. Then later on it would be clarified by a judge or whatever that he didn't have the authority and the US actually hasn't withdrawn officiall/legally. Maybe they bother trying to get it through the house but likely don't even try knowing they don't have the votes to actually do it.
His base won't really pay attention to anything that happens with it after he declares it and will still think they aren't in NATO and other Republicans in office who know better won't correct them. FOX won't bring it up unless it becomes some talking point about "activist judges" or something.
At that point I imagine Trump gets bored with it and moves on to something else or has already created a bigger distraction/mess. Maybe causes some other disruptions in other areas ways that further harms the State's relationship with NATO members as well out of spite since he can't withdraw.
Of course if something happens to another NATO country triggering article 5 while he's still in office, that's when it could get ugly because he would absolutely refuse to honor it. Hell even if he doesn't say they've withdrawn I wouldn't count on the US right now in that situation.
Then the real question is, how does the rest of NATO choose to react to all of this? What do they choose to do when someone else gets into office and tries to repair the relationship? I'm sure all NATO allies have learned no matter what happens, moving forward they can never fully count on or trust the US again.
But outside of anything that is caused by inaction, I don't expect Congress will do anything to stop him either. Republicans have shown there is no line for them these days. They're all-in no matter what. They don't give a shit about what happens to the country or the constitution. Democrats won't have the numbers to do shit until after midterms, assuming they don't f*** that up then we'll see if they actually do anything.
22
Anaptyso2 days ago
+8
Not just Congress, but the Judiciary as well. Both of the key "checks and balances" have proven that they aren't going to stop Trump. He can get away with almost anything he wants now.
At this point he could probably even declare that he's going to run for a third term and nobody would stop him.
Laws, constitutions, legal precedents and political norms means nothing unless enough people buy in to them to enforce them. They aren't magically applied, but have to be rigourously upheld.
The US is now in a period of constitution crisis. The only thing stopping this being far worse now isn't Congress and isn't the Judiciary. It's just that Trump hasn't yet decided to push the limits as far as they'd go. He - or his successor - could definitely get away with a lot more than he's done so far.
8
NMe842 days ago
+23
There are a lot of things that Trump can't do that he did anyway. If Congress doesn't pull rank nothing will stop him.
23
juno_phoenix2 days ago
+32
he'll sign an EO and theyll all play along
32
Double_Yam30102 days ago
+12
No, he can’t withdraw. But somehow, in the whackadoodle nightmare world we now inhabit, we’ve allowed him to become the Commander in Chief of the world’s most powerful military. He can order that military into or away from anywhere he wishes. Thus he can de facto withdraw from NATO by refusing to order our military to abide by the Articles of NATO’s charter.
12
phido30002 days ago
+11
What about a King?
Also they can totally withdraw all their troops, planes and resources and take funding to zero.
11
Cosmic_Seth2 days ago
+59
Just pieces of paper.
Trump can effectively end NATO and we know Congress won't stop him.
59
Halinn2 days ago
+15
He can't. He can render the US's part in it void for the duration of his presidency, but because he can't withdraw, it'll be easier to restore that part of international cooperation when he's gone.
15
Stryker-Ten2 days ago
+19
Once the trust is broken, it isnt going to magically rematerialised when trump leaves office. Most people were willing to overlook the first time, to treat trump as a freak accident. Then you elected him again, and its an order of magnitude worse
You cant expect countries to plan their national security around such an unstable, unreliable partner. The whole western world is scrambling to form their own alliances, both economic and military, without the US. The damage has been done, there is no returning to how things were before. Best case scenario, it takes decades for the US to rebuild the trust it has lost
19
not_old_redditor2 days ago
+8
If some allied country gets attacked and Trump refuses to send in the us military to help, who would force him and how?
8
haloweenek2 days ago
+866
As a EU citizen - we should effectively act like US is not in NATO.
With current humors of agent orange anything is possible.
866
stunts0022 days ago
+278
It was clear when they treated Zelensky like that.
NATO went above and beyond to help protect American interests for 20 years after 911, but the moment the threat is coming for Europe they tried to weasel out of their commitments
278
Canadian-Man-infj2 days ago
+62
To be fair, Zelenskyy was trying to discuss serious diplomatic issues and they wanted to play dress-up and a game of "Crazy Eights," or something...
62
PureLock332 days ago
+25
like a bunch of toddlers playing tea party. "You're not dressed and you didn't say thank you!"
25
takeda642 days ago
+6
Because now US is run by Russian agent.
6
kvikklunsjrevolver2 days ago
+108
Stop buying American military equipment asap, build our own, invest in European tech, weapons, infrastructure, and most importantly, the people.
Europe should produce everything that is critical to the safety and stability at home, and never outsource those to others.
Investing in our own industry is a smart move, and we wouldn’t be beholden to others in the way we are now.
Americans would be happy, because they can’t blame Europe for anything, and the rhetoric from over there makes it obvious they don’t see us as allies, or understand the stranglehold they have on Europe, which I imagine a lot of Europeans would be happy to move away from.
108
notyourbusiness392 days ago
+43
I am Canadian and agree with you, I hope our government will side more with Europe than the crazy folks south of the border…..
43
Geodiocracy2 days ago
+14
Canadians will have always get a warm welcome in The Netherlands. Strong ties still from back when the Canadians liberated that country through sacrifices.
14
kvikklunsjrevolver2 days ago
+28
Canada is great, and the Canadian people seem to share values and goals with Europe to a large extent, we also seem to have a lot of the same problems.
Which means we could really benefit from deeper collaboration and integration.
Hope we can work together and collaborate in the future to make a better and safer world.
I also hope there exists some Canadian fast food chain that has poutine and stuff.
America is experiencing something that seemingly needs to run its course, the best we can do is try to make the world as good as possible and as safe as possible in the meanwhile.
I also want to say, I do not hate Americans, I have many American friends, and many things in my life I hold dear is American.
I do not know where the vitriol and hateful rhetoric comes from, but I do not believe it is a good basis for any kind of relationship.
It doesn’t build trust, it doesn’t build respect, it only distances us.
28
KiaRioGrl2 days ago
+7
Poutine is way better from an independent chip truck than any fast food attempt at poutine.
>America is experiencing something that seemingly needs to run its course, the best we can do is try to make the world as good as possible and as safe as possible in the meanwhile.
No wonder our Maple MAGA are so angry - it must be incredibly jarring for an antivaxxer to actually *be* a vaccine.
7
ThlintoRatscar2 days ago
+6
I hate to say it, (Like, I really hate to say it) but the best fast food poutine from a Canadian company is from a company called "New York Fries".
6
NoShitsGivin2 days ago
+6
Which is a Canadian restraunt chain... ironic.
6
kvikklunsjrevolver2 days ago
+4
Genius. I’m just saying, there are a lot of hungry people over in Europe that had no access to poutine whatsoever.
4
BigPlunk2 days ago
+23
As a Canadian citizen, I feel the same. I believe behind the scenes our leadership is doing exactly that. The world is moving on from the U.S. whether we talk about it openly at the top levels or not. Everybody involved understands the size of the U.S. armed forces and intelligence agencies. We also understand how entwined the U.S. is with the global economy and how big a lift it will be to disentangle.
But we also see how broken the US is and how a single election is the difference between democracy, sanity, respect (of alliances, agreements, commitments, etc.), decorum, evidence-based, science-backed decisions, rule of law, and progress and then in 4 years none of the above. The US is a bipolar Jekyl and Hyde on the global stage. Not only did it elect Trump twice, which says a lot about the country, but it's checks and balances were all just illusions. There's no evidence of a functioning democracy or an economy that serves anyone but the oligarchs. The U.S. appears to serve at the pleasure of billionaires/oligarchs, Russia, Israel, and others that do not operate in the interests of the greater good of the many. The US has showed the world who it is as a nation and we all believe you now.
Maybe if we saw U.S. citizens in the streets, mounting a peaceful and sustained resistance every single day, demanding democracy, rule of law, upholding of your constitution, and progress that supports the good of the many over the few, we could hold out hope. You know, like Minnesota did recently with ICE? But you're all too busy blaming political parties and leaders, waiting for someone to save you, shouting from echo chambers, and giving all the reasons why it is up to someone else or not a good time to stand up for your future as your country heads for the falls with the world in tow. It looks like you all want to wait for Trump to nuke another country or fully steal an election before you act meaningfully, but the damage will be done by then and it could be too late.
So the rest of the world will act like the U.S. still has a seat at the big kid table while quietly restructuring the world economy, militaries, and alliances to mitigate the potential future harm the crack-smoking, Godzilla toddler can do. Hopefully Godzilla's tiny purple fingers stay off the big red button in the meantime.
23
faffc2602 days ago
+28
just assume we aren't until he's out of office, it's very unlikely he'll be able to make it official in anyway besides his word, not law, since that requires a super majority to be in favor. he probably will refuse to aid nato till he's out of office so will effectively leave it till he's no longer running the american military, as article 5 compels very little "support" when called if the nation doesn't want to give it.
28
imianha2 days ago
+67
I don't think its gonna be that easy to rebuild the trust on the US.
67
EMP_Pusheen2 days ago
+35
It's not. This is decades worth of alliance building being undone by this fat idiot and his fat idiot voters. If it gets reversed in my lifetime I will be surprised. America has proven that as long as people are stupid enough that the country is at best a very unreliable ally if not outright adversary. We're also plenty stupid, so who would trust us going forward?
35
51ngular1ty2 days ago
+18
I think there is one way to do it. The US hands over this administration to the Hague/ICC. It's a pipe dream though.
18
scorchedcross2 days ago
+8
Step 1 of the program is acceptance.
Your country will pretty much have to do an AA program on steroids to atone.
8
Tribalbob2 days ago
+12
Yeah it's a weird thing a lot of Americans are saying "well, we just need to vote him out and all will be fine"
Speaking as a Canadian: lol not likely. That's step 1 of a very long, very hard and very humbling experience the US will have to go through.
12
ScoobyDoNot2 days ago
+11
The USA has demonstrated to its former allies that it is at best only ever 4 years from potentially electing a moronic despot, and that its much vaunted "checks and balances" are completely useless.
11
Blacksmith_Several2 days ago
+73
Nobody believes this is just a Trump issue anymore
73
MusicCityVol2 days ago
+30
Of course not. It's a Republican issue.
Democrats leave a LOT to be desired, but they aren't actively trying to blow up the Constitution along with every other treaty and agreement we've signed since the founding of the country.
30
Sensei_of_Philosophy2 days ago
+26
You fail to understand that its not just Trump. He's the symptom of the problem, not the actual problem.
The United States has its work cut out for it if it hopes to restore trust with the free world again. It'll take quite a long time as well, I'm afraid.
26
zzzoom2 days ago
+6
Half of your voters don't understand soft power. Trump isn't the problem, he's the result.
6
[deleted]2 days ago
+168
[deleted]
168
wtg29892 days ago
+155
Yeah because America has been known lately to stick to its checks and balances
155
Impressive-Weird-9082 days ago
+7
What do you mean? Donald has been cashing checks and watching his bank account balance. What else is there?
7
Loose_Skill66412 days ago
+31
the headline is wrong, the trump admin did not say it's thinking of leaving nato, they said they are thinking are shutting down their bases in nato countries
31
Telstar25252 days ago
+45
Won’t that make Putin happy
45
foghillgal2 days ago
+15
You Betcha!
15
foghillgal2 days ago
+15
That would be so dumb that they may do it. Cut your projection of force. Make yourself even weaker. Yup, great plan buddy.
15
Ixziga2 days ago
+291
Conservatives won't rest until every last ounce of dignity is gone
291
DoublePostedBroski2 days ago
+66
Anything to “own the libs”
66
Mr_IT2 days ago
+17
It’s beyond insanity
17
redditmademeregister2 days ago
+7
Call them what they are: Fascist Party of America.
7
steelcryo2 days ago
+174
The **defence** force didn't join our **offensive** action, so we're leaving!
This is how f****** dumb this administration is.
174
Technical-Activity952 days ago
+36
also give us the greenland now or else...
36
External-Praline-4512 days ago
+9
Not dumb, just morally bankrupt opportunists and grifters. Trump was looking for an excuse to leave NATO to please daddy Poots.
9
platoface5412 days ago
+71
Putin and Xi laughing their asses off
71
ssfgrgawer1 day ago
+4
I never thought I'd see the day where the US would elect a dumber president than George Bush 2.
By comparison to the Orange Moron, Bush is practically a wordsmith of unrivaled skill and ability. We used to think he was dumb, but Trump has thrown the bar down a ravine and into the deepest depths that I'm concerned the Americans will never recover from this.
In less than 12 years we learned that the average American is even dumber than we thought, because they voted in the insane, dementia disabled, war criminal, convicted felon, dumpy trumpy.
Any respect I had for America drained away during the first trump administration. And they did it again? Come on America. Do better.
4
AsparagusFern3192 days ago
+272
God, I really f****** hope not
Either way. He's just. Incapable of going more than a few hours without lashing out at *somebody*, because god forbid anything be his fault / he take responsibility for his own stupid actions.
272
Bongressman2 days ago
+25
Like a violence, attention addicted vampire... someone always needs to be attacked for the thirst to be sated.
Life across the globe would be infinitely better, for all, if just one man decided to only play golf, sleep and eat McDonald's for 4 years straight. But nooooooooo!
25
GunsouBono2 days ago
+6
Thata either the narcissist in him or the dementia. Unsure which right now.
6
AsparagusFern3192 days ago
+4
I feel like this is a good place to put the "Both? Both. Both is good." meme from road to el dorado
4
wtg29892 days ago
+16
Yep. Always attacking
16
Persimmon-Mission2 days ago
+21
It’s is narcissism. Trump has the at least two of three of the dark triad (Machiavellianism)..and probably psychopathy too.
And people voted for it.
21
thetall0ne12 days ago
+54
“Thanks” - Putin
54
Remote-Ad-26862 days ago
+65
What’s next? Trump allows Texas to secede from the union ?
65
thorkun2 days ago
+57
I think as long as they paid him personally a lot of money he would see no problems with it.
57
Helpful-Gas-72752 days ago
+22
Don’t give him ideas. I could see him suggesting that he and Claudia Sheinbaum could develop a profitable joint venture applying tariffs to the good citizens of an independent Texas. In fact he suggested, just now, that he could work with Iran to jointly charge tolls to ships transiting the Straits of Hormuz. Some clever devil suggested they call it an “Ayatollah Booth”.
22
Silentrein2 days ago
+9
Can we convince Florida as well?
9
ThkAbootIt2 days ago
+6
He already said Cuba is next. Then probably Greenland (for some reason)?
6
20ol2 days ago
+18
They won't. They want to continue to sell weapons to NATO.
18
coreychch2 days ago
+35
If anyone has the cognitive ability in Trumps administration, they should actually *read* the NATO agreement, especially the bit about it being a defensive pact, not an offensive one. The U.S. *attacked* Iran - so you’re on your own.
But I guess Trump is just listening to Putin telling him that NATO is costing them billions for nothing in return. Thats how easily he can be manipulated.
35
MarmotFullofWoe2 days ago
+15
If the US withdraws from NATO they will lose all of their overseas bases.
Thats a fast way to become a regional power.
15
Helpful-Gas-72752 days ago
+125
The US left NATO a long time ago. Once Trump mused about not coming to the aid of a NATO country the value of US guarantees went to junk bond status.
125
One_Handed_Typing2 days ago
+49
Did he do this before or after he "mused" about invading two NATO countries?
49
obvilious2 days ago
+8
What? I don’t think people understand the breadth of what NATO encompasses. Just the standard bodies themselves are a significant part and would be seriously impacted if the US left.
8
whatsgoingon3502 days ago
+39
When did the Iran war end?
Last I checked the straight is still closed and negotiations haven't even truly started.
39
cptstubing162 days ago
+9
Not according to the stock market.
9
PureLock332 days ago
+9
and that's what really counts here.
9
staebles2 days ago
+7
Iran said we already violated the ceasefire
7
BlueCrystals_2 days ago
+8
*”Annnndd it’s gone.”*
8
Any-Difficulty27822 days ago
+31
he can’t, he isn’t congress
31
Not_Sure__Camacho2 days ago
+18
Hello, tariffs anyone?
18
flexecute112352 days ago
+10
Yes I often test my stove by analyzing its willingness to cut grass
10
Born-Media64362 days ago
+10
Full on grade school mentality. Children. You never invite me to your parties. No one ever comes to mine. F****** embarrassing.
10
RostyC2 days ago
+9
HE has hated NATO for a long time, starting when he visited Russia/putin and wanted to do business there. Probably got filmed and is now putin puppet So of course he wants NATO gone..
9
Notwerk2 days ago
+16
Of course he is. That's why Putin put him in power to begin with. This has been coming down the pike for 10 years at least.
16
UsefulImpact67932 days ago
+9
trump the traitorous toad doing dummy shit. Again.
9
androvich172 days ago
+9
DJT making Putin's wildest dreams come true. Best employee of the decade
9
Algae_Mission2 days ago
+16
Vladimir Putin’s greatest fantasy made real. The stuff he has on Trump must be really terrible. That, or Trump is exceptionally stupid. Probably both.
This is our Suez Canal moment and the beginning of the end of the American Century. And the rise of the Chinese Century.
16
Maus6662 days ago
+8
Great news, then the rest of us won't get dragged into more wars when the US inevitably gets attacked again by one or more of the millions of terrorists they're currently creating.
8
joeengland2 days ago
+7
Ridiculous fools. America is not a superpower without our allies. This is an idiotic step towards self-destruction, and we've done it to ourselves.
7
the_dj_zig2 days ago
+7
As always, he can’t do that. Only Congress can.
7
[deleted]2 days ago
+6
Doesn't Congress need to vote on that?
6
kyle7872 days ago
+7
And then a bunch of countries would kick our militaries out and close US bases. Thus taking away are ability to have assets staged around the world, our biggest strength in terms of logistics. I don't understand how this is even a conversation.
7
_ficklelilpickle2 days ago
+6
How does this dumb f*** still not comprehend that NATO - a *defense* alliance - was never going to join an offensive attack? Never mind an incredibly poorly thought out one?
Seriously, how the hell did the voter base come to the decision that this guy is the best you’ve got to offer? TWICE!?!?
6
queen-adreena2 days ago
+6
Does he thing that anyone's going to buy the USA's overpriced military shit without NATO?
He's speed-running "end the US empire" so effectively, it's impossible not to think it's on purpose.
6
SubRosaSubway2 days ago
+14
America’s ability to project power and influence in their historical sphere of influence would be ZERO by leaving NATO. Trump doesn’t understand history, the role of NATO and its value in the world. He’s dangerous and absolutely the dumbest President in the history of the United States.
14
redgrandam2 days ago
+6
He’s doing everything he can to create instability everywhere he can. People will be cleaning up his mess long after he’s gone.
6
Otazihs2 days ago
+6
He's been wanting to do this for awhile now. I swear, these fucks are Russian plants.
6
ptyslaw2 days ago
+7
Doesn’t it take 2/3 vote in the senate?
7
FeistyTie52812 days ago
+14
F*** Trump.
NATO has spent decades bailing the USA out of every shit situation their incompetent government has engaged in without any forethought.
Time for 'Muricans to deal with their own shit without everyone else constantly bailing them out.
Good luck without NATO.
14
Univeralise2 days ago
+11
Cool, so anyway.
Can us Europeans work together for a nuclear umbrella?
It doesn’t matter if he does or doesn’t anymore; he’s signalled his unreliability which damages NATO anyway
11
Melstead2 days ago
+15
Russia wants this, not Americans or Europeans.
15
Civil-Dinner2 days ago
+14
Trump would love to, but he has a significant barrier to overcome.
At this point, though, the Republicans have been so feckless, Trump probably thinks he can do it without Senate approval and no one is brave enough to tell him the truth.
14
kvikklunsjrevolver2 days ago
+13
I keep hearing about these barriers that are going to stop Trump from doing something, yet the things still happen.
13
Dazzling-Leave-74482 days ago
+10
He has been mulling since his first term and we should expect it to happen. He’s an idiot
10
BunRabbit2 days ago
+5
That'll be great for American defence contractors.
5
SpontaneousDream2 days ago
+6
Well, yeah. They're bought and paid for by Russia. How is this not blatantly obvious to people?
6
hammerofhope2 days ago
+5
The only thing this m*********** knows how to do is break things and walk away, leaving everyone else to clean up.
5
Ziegelphilie2 days ago
+5
The American weapon industry must love losing all the nato contracts
5
Informal_Process22382 days ago
+4
Trump has been against nato ever since russia started Controlling him decades ago
4
nedhamson2 days ago
+5
It still take a vote in the US Senate to do this and I hope they are not as stupid as Trump thinks they are.
5
WretchedRat2 days ago
+4
Trump effectively declared his intentions when he publicly talked about taking over Greenland. He was looking for a scapegoat in Iran. He would have backed out of that war and blamed NATO countries for failing to win.
Member nations of NATO should order the US military out of every base in their countries.
And for the record, I believe this is what Putin wants. No more US; much easier to roll into other former Soviet Bloc countries with much less resistance.
4
mobani2 days ago
+4
Trump is so deranged. NATO is a DEFENCE alliance! How freaking hard is that to understand?
4
Pando52802 days ago
+5
Exactly why Russia helped him get elected.
5
famousbrouse2 days ago
+4
Being from the UK, I almost hope the US does withdraw as it will force our hand to rejoin the EU again as we will want to be part of the massive amount of investment into European defence companies that will inevitably happen as a result.
The US defence companies will be furious with the government I imagine if the withdrawal did happen.
In the long term Europe will inevitably be stronger if the US leaves by necessity, and would hopefully also lead to a bigger focus on internal investment into other areas, such as tech, so we are not so reliant on them.
Leaving NATO would be financially disastrous to the US.
4
tim_h52 days ago
+4
Okay, but you can no longer use ANY OF OUT TERRITORY FOR YOUR BASES OR OPERATIONS.
GOOD LUCK WITH THAT.
See ya, yanks
4
Fuddamatic2 days ago
+4
Trump cannot withdraw from NATO. Congress would have to.
4
GarnetOblivion12 days ago
+3
No he can’t withdraw but he can state that the US won’t fulfill any obligations of the treaty.
3
Lamb_or_Beast2 days ago
+4
He must really truly want this; he tries so hard to make our allies feel like enemies. Guess he wants to make this idea sound like a good one for the rest of NATO
4
LOUD-AF2 days ago
+4
Wouldn't withdrawl from NATO signal the possible eviction of US military assets located in NATO member countries? That could prove interesting.
4
Zetavu2 days ago
+3
They can pull all they want, without Congressional approval theh can't do anything.
Its like declaring war, oh wait...
3
OpeningPrune9232 days ago
+5
Good call. A shit-hole country with a criminal dictator wants to pull out of NATO.
Good riddance.
5
bishpa2 days ago
+5
I really like idea of Republicans running as the party that destroyed the most successful military alliance in the history of the world.
5
bicycle-made-for22 days ago
+4
To be honest I suspect that NATO would be better off without the USA anyway. Now they have realised that they have been rorted financially for years with USA defence contracts. Even if it is hard initially I do believe they would be better off without the strangling rope known as the USA round their necks. Let the ISA see how they get on without the various bases throughout Europe and the rest of the world.
4
enricokern2 days ago
+3
Good bye. Close all your bases in nato territory then too
3
Morden0132 days ago
+4
Please do! You don't belong there or in any alliance.
America first means America only and f*** the rest. Nobody should count on you.
4
Needle_Bearings2 days ago
+3
The end game of the right wing is always Fascism.
3
Environmental-Age1492 days ago
+5
Oh that's definitely a win for Putin.....weird coincidence
5
Old-Buffalo-51512 days ago
+4
Everyone knowledgeable on the subject iv spoken too has says the EU would experience significant benfits if American left NATO today because the security and economic situation has SIGNIFICANTLY changed in the last 5 years.
This isn't the threat it used to be...
4
Hot-Comfort88392 days ago
+4
Exiting NATO ends American power projection.
No NATO, no American bases in Europe, no forward deployment, no logistical dominance.
The power of the American military isn’t the technology so much as the ability to move upwards of a fully supplied & supported division almost anywhere in 48 hours.
That ceases with the withdrawal from NATO.
4
totallyRebb1 day ago
+5
It's one of his tasks from Putin et al to destroy/weaken NATO, one way or the other.
Be it by dragging them into a dirty war they don't belong in, or this.
Iran is just an excuse they can use for public consumption and the history books.
5
lattice_defect2 days ago
+21
f****** do it already.. we're all so sick of this bullshit and this never ending narcissistic nightmare..
21
Adept-Donut-42292 days ago
+6
Just GO already! NATO doesn't want your fat ass getting us into a war with no evidence!
6
Mba19562 days ago
+7
If the US wants to pull out of NATO then I foresee many countries happily opening the door for them to exit. This is something that would have been thought of as unthinkable only 2 years ago.
Nobody wants to be aligned with a country threatening to kill everyone in a country of 93 million people. But rest assured if they leave then they also vacate all Nato countries and I am sure the gulf states aren’t too enamoured with him either after he dragged them into his conflict.
America First can be America Alone.
7
Falconflyer752 days ago
+18
Whatever
the US never comes to anyone’s aid anyways
All they do is start fights to get more oil and drag the rest of the world into them
18
SillyGoatGruff2 days ago
+3
I mean, they just lost a war with iran that they started... how useful are they really right now lol
3
AleXstheDark2 days ago
+3
I wish. USA out, Ukraine in.
Time to stop buying USA weapons, Invest all that money in developing Europe's own weapons, our own satellites and our own nuclear weapons.
Mid-Long term is the best for Europe.
198 Comments