ListNook

JohnBrownSurvivor Apr 13, 2026 +2997

How does he actually have the power to fire all these people? Or does he just say he wants them fired and whoever is in control of that institution just goes ahead and does what he wants?

2997

tropicsun Apr 13, 2026 +1881

Or how he can single handily cancel organizations like the national forest service… or sell public land.

1881

MACHOmanJITSU Apr 13, 2026 +1424

But Biden can’t tweak some loan terms for student borrowers.. f*** the Supreme Tabernacle.

1424

Primsun Apr 13, 2026 +235

The secret is just to redo it every month with a new legal justification or batshit theory ... or just delete the data and close the account I guess.

235

BirdLawyer50 Apr 13, 2026 +66

Yeah the trick is just do it and let everyone against it fight it out. Literally. Just do it. Biden could’ve ordered 0% interest and just didn’t because he was timid

66

MongooseBrigadier Apr 13, 2026 +156

"because he was timid" No, because it was illegal and he respected the rule of law. Just because it is more effective in the short term to do illegal things, doesn't mean that's good for democracy or a functioning state.

156

BirdLawyer50 Apr 13, 2026 +25

I’ll accept they were trying to do things lawfully but also bent over backwards to not even attempt something even vaguely creative to approach ch a perceived problem. It truly felt like “we have tried nothing and run out of ideas”

25

mrpenchant Apr 13, 2026 +68

He forgave over $180 billion in student loan debt and he introduced the SAVE repayment plan to help people out further. Saying he did nothing is absolute nonsense.

68

JailhouseMamaJackson Apr 13, 2026 +42

Did you miss where Biden DID attempt even more than he did for student loans and it got overturned?

42

Kryptosis Apr 13, 2026 +1

This is BS. I had a path to actually repay with Biden. Trump fucked that as soon as he could. So my parents said f*** it and spent my inheritance paying off the loans they talked me into years ago.

1

Illustrious-Tower849 Apr 13, 2026 +1

Right because he was timid

1

outerproduct Apr 13, 2026 +17

Or, you know, not batshit insane.

17

K10RumbleRumble Apr 13, 2026 +6

I honestly hope that it’s all so muddy and fucked at this point, whoever the hell shows up to attempt to salvage this dumpster fire just has to hit the reset button.

6

deepasleep Apr 13, 2026 +4

Because he wasn’t a lawless piece of shit.

4

annuidhir Apr 13, 2026 +2

He..did order 0% interest? It was called the SAVE repayment plan or something.That's what I've had for years now. Though, the Trump administration just ended that, so I have to change my repayment plan by June..

2

ProfNesbitt Apr 13, 2026 +48

This is my biggest problem no one is willing to do the “illegal” stuff for the side of good. When Biden forgave student loans he should have ordered all the records of the loans destroyed as well and had it done before a court could rule on it.

48

mrpenchant Apr 13, 2026 +24

I am not saying I don’t want my politicians to be more effective but how can supporting leaders just ignoring all laws and doing whatever they want actually be a good solution?

24

nachosmind Apr 13, 2026 +2

You can’t bring a knife to a gun fight, you can’t half measure against fascists. They made the first move by pardoning January 6th people who now are ready and can convince others Trump will save them even if they bend the rules of law. Biden / Democrats could’ve created extreme loyalty for 18-30 year olds but now doesn’t have that at a pivotal moment.

2

mrpenchant Apr 13, 2026 +16

You aren’t suggesting fighting fascism, you are suggesting becoming fascist though. You are just saying we should support people to be “good” fascists. Fighting fascists would be prosecuting those who have committed crimes and changing the system to prevent a repeat of events, not claiming absolute power for your dictator.

16

fevered_visions Apr 13, 2026 +6

> This is my biggest problem no one is willing to do the “illegal” stuff for the side of good. ["Let anyone who wishes the republic to be safe, come with me \[to f****** murder the jackass who is currently wrecking politics\]"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Senatus_consultum_ultimum)

6

thoughtfractals85 Apr 13, 2026 +11

Oh, supreme tabernacle is so good! I'm using that.

11

goonSquad15 Apr 13, 2026 +76

because congress is spineless and worried about going against trump

76

pigeieio Apr 13, 2026 +68

Not spineless, complicit. They are on board for this. If they where not spineless they would be out publicly supporting and drawing attention to their part and really explaining to their constituents what they are doing to them and their constitution.

68

EvoEpitaph Apr 13, 2026 +5

Agreed, spineless will be their "defense" when the tables turn and accountability is on the table. But it's 100% complicit.

5

winklesnad31 Apr 13, 2026 +16

He made massive cuts and forced moves no one wanted, but the Forest Service still exists. For now.

16

haveanairforceday Apr 13, 2026 +21

Our society doesnt view government as primarily the rule of law, we think of it as the rule of the ruler. We have been lucky that the rulers before this one were principled enough that they tried to follow the law

21

crossdtherubicon Apr 13, 2026 +1

This deserves more attention. I would add: people wrongly assume the President as being the central figure of government. And the President's unique powers do not in itself make the position the central mechanism of legislation. In conjunction with that false belief, Congress continues to allow the President to amalgamate more powers that traditionally the position did not have. By doing so, the President has become more powerful in practice but, not on paper. Congress has been passing less legislation - ie. doing less work - as more money has entered politics and they focus on fundraising. So, Presidents take advantage of that both in campaigning (they as an individual will fix the problems) and in their expanded powers as President (unchecked legal overreaches).

1

Yvaelle Apr 13, 2026 +3

He can't, but every Republican in the country does anything he want. He isn't singlehandedly doing anything. 80 million Americans are gleefully ignoring the laws to obey his cult

3

UbiSububi8 Apr 13, 2026 +678

We need to significantly reduce the power of the president.

678

Capt1an_Cl0ck Apr 13, 2026 +232

Yes. And yes.

232

Individual_Bell_4637 Apr 13, 2026 +214

The good news is, it wouldn't be that difficult. A properly functioning Congress seriously constrains the President's power. Unfortunately, they have not chosen to do so for quite awhile now.

214

KidOcelot Apr 13, 2026 +27

Soo reduce presidential, and congressional powers? Im a little daring today, so maybe add in a third institution similar to Congress and House, to balance things out?

27

pcj Apr 13, 2026 +41

I think allowing better recall/no-confidence options would be a good step. And also moving away from first-past-the-post voting options to encourage third party options.

41

TBTrpt3 Apr 13, 2026 +14

How about we stop letting the House go on recess for so long? I'm in favor of not giving them any break longer than a 3 day weekend. That's all I get, why should they get more?

14

Effective_Quail_3946 Apr 13, 2026 +9

And no benefits, no pensions if they shut down congress

9

pcj Apr 13, 2026 +4

Causing Congress to go without pay/benefits in these scenarios would just strengthen the power of lobbyists, I fear

4

pcj Apr 13, 2026 +8

I mean, I'm all for if they can't pass a real budget, then they immediately get recalled.

8

Individual_Bell_4637 Apr 13, 2026 +14

I'm not sure how you can reduce Congressional power without empowering the executive. Have judges make every call? The Constitution is pretty clear that Congress has primacy in lawmaking, spending, and war. In theory, Congress is the only branch that we control directly. You will never ever speak to the President, or a Supreme Court justice, but it doesn't take all that much effort to speak to your elected representatives personally. I don't know that we would want to reduce their power. It's more about getting them to actually exert it.

14

pubsky Apr 13, 2026 +5

Or make it impossible for another branch to exert the powers of the other. It's pretty messed up that our supreme court has decided that if the legislature doesn't exercise it's power, it is fine to let the president or the court assume the power.

5

FinndBors Apr 13, 2026 +2

I think the DoJ needs clear independence from both congress and the president. An independent DoJ would help tremendously right now.

2

Individual_Bell_4637 Apr 13, 2026 +3

I once read a crazy idea that I loved. A 3rd house of Congress, made up of citizens selected jury-duty style to serve one year.

3

cyvaquero Apr 13, 2026 +8

The House of Representatives is the people’s house and the same people that would be in that proposed “jury pool” voted for who is in the House. If you think picking randos would be an improvement you really need remember that roughly half the population is below average intelligence.

8

Individual_Bell_4637 Apr 13, 2026 +3

So, the people in Congress for the last 10 years are high intelligence? I'll take my chances. And there is a big big difference in the House. They are people who want to be politicians.

3

greenman5252 Apr 13, 2026 +5

Seems like the Republicans support what the leader of their party is doing since they control all the levers in the house, Senate, and Supreme Court

5

Individual_Bell_4637 Apr 13, 2026 +1

Yes, I agree. I'm including this current Congress among many others in recent past as being way too agreeable with Presidents of their own party. Which is to be expected to some extent, of course. And there's always been a power of the 'bully pulpit', or the 'pen and phone'. But there was a time when Congressional leaders expected to set their own legislative agenda, even when the President shared their party affiliation. The President reacted to Congressional priorities. For a lot of years now, it has been the other way around.

1

full_bodied_muppet Apr 13, 2026 +5

Congress has actively stripped away its own power in favor of the president for decades now. One party continued operating under the honor system and the other has been salivating about it, and we're experiencing the direct result.

5

Individual_Bell_4637 Apr 13, 2026 +1

I agree with your first sentence completely.

1

Cormacolinde Apr 13, 2026 +6

Chosen? Congress hasn’t been a democratic body for a while. The US was an oligarchy long before Trump.

6

Capt1an_Cl0ck Apr 13, 2026 +2

Spineless Republican bootlickers.

2

dejavuamnesiac Apr 13, 2026 +1

Congress will always be limited by MAGA State reps. The power of the entire federal government needs to be reduced. States Rights! Coalitions of Blue States can check an out of control Fed. Nothing in the constitution requires such a huge federal gov

1

bros402 Apr 13, 2026 +2

Let's repeal the Reapportionment Act of 1929 and adopt the Wyoming Rule.

2

Individual_Bell_4637 Apr 13, 2026 +3

I'm right there with you, all in on that idea. Have been for decades, and it's good to see folks on both sides of the aisle seeing the value there. If nothing else, at least local leaders are easier to primary/recall/persuade than national ones with large gerrymandered enclaves of safe votes to sit on. ETA: I would even take your statement a step further, and say that the Constitution clearly intends to privilige State governments over the federal government, with the stated exceptions of certain functions, such as defense and import/export control.

3

Gay_Giraffe_1773 Apr 13, 2026 +172

The President actually legally has very little power. What is happening is outside the bounds of legality and is just happening because the so called "checks and balances" we have are just handshake agreements with no teeth when the people who are supposed to do the checking and balancing are complicit.

172

the_sneaky_artist Apr 13, 2026 +27

Just "handshake agreements with no teeth" means he actually does have a lot of power.

27

Kaffe-Mumriken Apr 13, 2026 +14

You fell into the same trap of “the president is a good faith actor”

14

eliz1bef Apr 13, 2026 +50

He's doing things the president doesn't actually have the power to do and people are just rolling over like friendly dogs and peeing themselves.

50

thefuzzhead Apr 13, 2026 +17

That means prying the patriot act out of their 80 year old corrupt little fingers.

17

LowerRhubarb Apr 13, 2026 +14

More like prying Citizen's United out of their malicious clawed hands. The moment that c*** passed bribery became legal.

14

T1442 Apr 13, 2026 +7

They don't have the power to forgive student loans or help people in any way.

7

jwely Apr 13, 2026 +28

**This is a wild miss.** The president does NOT have this power, but a Republican Congress and stacked/stolen Republican supreme court that makes up our "checks and balances" has willfully conceeded this power to him. A measure they will certainly undo the moment their special boy isn't in the Whitehouse anymore. Republicans **as a party** are going to try and pin this on one horrible man who is certain to grow into his role of being universally hated, and the American people are so fuckig stupid that it's going to work. In a just world, it would mean the complete extinction of the Republican party (and quite possibly the Democratic party too) due to sweeping election reform that made room for 6+ viable parties to form and thrive like every other healthy democracy on earth has.

28

JohnBrownSurvivor Apr 13, 2026 +20

Seriously! Every time I would see the Democrats giving more power to the president, even when they are in power (and a democratic president would never use that power anyway), I would just be screaming at the wall that all they were doing was giving power to a future Republican president so that it can be abused. And that is exactly what the orange a****** is doing right now. He's abusing power as fast as he can left and right, just to prove that he can and just to destroy as much as possible. Something tells me he knows he's going to hell, and he's trying to make it so that Satan cedes his rule of hell to Trump as soon as he gets there.

20

CondescendingShitbag Apr 13, 2026 +3

Kevin McCarthy would really like to know why the Democrats would allow this.

3

Ltjenkins Apr 13, 2026 +2

Don’t those powers already not exist? There just isn’t the rest of the government to challenge/restrict on these proclamations? We live in a world where he can just executive order away amendments of the constitution but that’s not how it works.

2

pushaper Apr 13, 2026 +2

Americans catching up to 2003?

2

UbiSububi8 Apr 13, 2026 +1

Better late than never?

1

Kaarl_Mills Apr 13, 2026 +2

I'd say abolish the office at this point

2

mattxb Apr 13, 2026 +1

We already did then congress and the supreme court gave their power to trump to do whatever he wants

1

RayzTheRoof Apr 13, 2026 +1

Most of what he does isn't even within the powers of the president. It's just that no one tells him no.

1

matthieuC Apr 13, 2026 +1

Just wait for a President to get elected and the supreme court will now say the president is a symbolic figure,

1

dejavuamnesiac Apr 13, 2026

I’d say reduce the power of the entire federal government and move everything possible to the States or coalitions of States. Otherwise every time MAGA gets back in power they just destroy anything federal that was rebuilt and they pardon all the criminals. Any federal crime can generally be prosecuted at the State level.

0

UbiSububi8 Apr 13, 2026 +2

Republicans have been trying to shift stuff from federal to state for decades. Especially when they couldn’t win federally. If this was policy, some states might not have civil rights.

2

StoicWoobie Apr 13, 2026 +168

The Presidio Trust is a federal agency and it's board of directors is appointed either directly or indirectly by the president. I believe the directors serve at the pleasure of the president and thus can be dismissed by the president.

168

Unusual_Flounder2073 Apr 13, 2026 +105

Usually the new trustees are selected so there can be a handoff. But as usual the president uses chaos to destroy our national institutions.

105

badwolf1013 Apr 13, 2026 +13

He probably just found this out (from Stephen Miller, I’m sure,) and decided to replace them with his “friends” (aka people who can enrich him.)

13

tremere110 Apr 13, 2026 +71

They are federal national park employees. As president he has the authority to fire them. Unfortunately.

71

Eastern-Manner-1640 Apr 13, 2026 +8

doesn't the park service have a legislatively defined structure and purpose that can't be carried out with no employees?

8

Xeorm124 Apr 13, 2026 +2

There's no details on how long it can go without a director or other such employees. And if they dislike the way it is being managed it would be on Congress to legislate and enforce their will on the Executive. In practice they seem fine with it and don't think it'll blow back on them in the polls, so it's fine to do so. Nonenforcement of laws by the executive to nullify them is a pretty common practice. The uncommon bit is doing it with relatively popular laws like the national park service.

2

Zipps0 Apr 13, 2026 +21

If you read the article they were expecting to get replaced at some point and were essentially acting as stand in’s until new board members were selected to replace them. They had some class in the statements the released as well. It’s more the manner in which Trump is acting.

21

Material_Reach_8827 Apr 13, 2026 +14

Enough liberals stayed home or voted 3rd party in 2016 that Republicans got to appoint 3 hardline SCOTUS justices, tipping the court 6-3 conservative for decades (when it could've been 5-4 liberal). These people then proceeded to overturn old precedent or make up new rules to grant the president even more power, and it's responsible for basically everything that's happened since then. In particular there's a pending SCOTUS case that's almost certainly going to go Trump's way which will prevent Congress from placing any restrictions on a president's ability to fire most appointees, except probably for the ones conservatives care about (e.g. Federal Reserve).

14

JohnBrownSurvivor Apr 13, 2026 +3

And then, the SCOTUS will try to reverse themselves as soon as a Democrat gets elected. You know, if we ever have elections again.

3

spectra2000_ Apr 13, 2026 +3

Most of the time he doesn’t, but those responsible for keeping him in line and telling him no are either cowards or in league with him

3

long-da-schlong Apr 13, 2026 +2

Yes, the second one

2

bros402 Apr 13, 2026 +2

Some of the people decide to actually listen to him when he says it (when he doesn't have the power to do it). Or they resign in protest.

2

JohnBrownSurvivor Apr 13, 2026 +1

And they should NEVER resign in protest. Rise to follow the illegal/immoral order and force then to fire you.

1

MillHall78 Apr 13, 2026 +3

He was able to disband the US Forest Service because the US Department of Agriculture controls it & that's the industry that destroyed US farms by reducing their human consumption crops over our lifetimes to just 20%, with around half of that exported. It's one of our most corrupt departments. Something should also be said about the culture of Americans never bothering to start class action lawsuits.

3

bigginz87 Apr 13, 2026 +1

Presidio is federal land, just like Ocean beach and other areas I can't remember at the moment

1

Alexis_J_M Apr 13, 2026 +1

The board is appointed by the president and serves at his pleasure. Normally this isn't a heavily politicized position, but Trump weaponizes or commercializes everything he can.

1

RottenPingu1 Apr 13, 2026 +2907

He doesn't even know what they are. This is someone else.

2907

dubbzy104 Apr 13, 2026 +685

He thought it was the San Francisco President Trust

685

RoarOfTheWorlds Apr 13, 2026 +101

Ex-President Trust will rue the day he walked afoul of big strong dear leader 💪

101

Max_Trollbot_ Apr 13, 2026 +3

I though the Ex-Presidents only robbed banks and surfed

3

boot2skull Apr 13, 2026 +44

Presidio? I never understood that Phil Collins song.

44

Nonconformists Apr 13, 2026 +38

It’s about a girl he met in the Stu-stu-studio

38

Flip_d_Byrd Apr 13, 2026 +6

And she was a stu-stu-stutterer.

6

ClayQuarterCake Apr 13, 2026 +7

Or the San Presidio Landscaping

7

hkohne Apr 13, 2026 +5

Does SF even have four seasons? Or Four Seasons? Of any kind? And I don't think "fog" can be counted as a season.

5

Uhhhhh55 Apr 13, 2026 +233

Stephen Miller

233

RottenPingu1 Apr 13, 2026 +105

I think you are right. That guy is dangerous.

105

schlamster Apr 13, 2026 +93

Oh you mean the guy who is an unelected official who moved into military housing at the beginning of the administration to “protect his family” — think about that. He knew that what they were about to hatch over these next few years was SO EGREGIOUS that he pre emptively moved his family onto a military base as a civilian advisor.

93

Uncle_Hephaestus Apr 13, 2026 +104

probably the nazi traitor Steve Miller.

104

dogsanddogsanddogsan Apr 13, 2026 +47

One of those freedoms cities with no laws that’s just for billionaires and their slaves

47

NaiveChoiceMaker Apr 13, 2026 +44

Libertarian cities have never worked out. They’ll never work out.

44

FreeUsePolyDaddy Apr 13, 2026 +32

Bears love them though.

32

My_Name_Is_Steven Apr 13, 2026 +15

and fire.

15

nuixy Apr 13, 2026 +1

Peter Thiel has offices there.

1

jvs8380 Apr 13, 2026 +185

Next, he’ll announce he’s building a Trump Presidio Hotel just to own the libs

185

_bk_adv Apr 13, 2026 +1709

He literally called environmentalists terrorists. He’s a disgusting human being.

1709

winterwolf2010 Apr 13, 2026 +458

Trump “is” an environmental terrorist. He’s hazardous to the environment.

458

VentureQuotes Apr 13, 2026 +97

Trump IS an environmental terrorist

97

kstargate-425 Apr 13, 2026 +40

His tweet during the snow storm of the NE on Jan 23, 2026 was ironic considering weeks later the country hit new record highs across almost the whole country lol Trump tweet: >***Record Cold Wave expected to hit 40 States. Rarely seen anything like it before. Could the Environmental Insurrectionists please explain - WHATEVER HAPPENED TO GLOBAL WARMING???***

40

gwazmalurk Apr 13, 2026 +385

Next shiny object seen by the Kleptocracy

385

Dandan0005 Apr 13, 2026 +94

Yep it’s prime real estate and I have no doubt he wants to get his grubby little fingers all over it

94

justabill71 Apr 13, 2026 +12

And it has a golf course.

12

JC2535 Apr 13, 2026 +118

This is about building luxury homes and hotels.

118

Upstairs_Baby8424 Apr 13, 2026 +36

Nobody is going to build there because by time this goes through the entire process and a Democrat comes in they’re just going to undo everything. Developers be damned. I also think the state will step in at some point as well and put up roadblocks.

36

GreyBeardEng Apr 13, 2026 +109

"The Presidio Trust Board of Directors governs a federal agency established in 1996 to manage and rehabilitate the 1,500-acre former military post, the Presidio of San Francisco. It operates the site—containing hiking trails, housing, and businesses—to ensure it is self-sustaining through leasing revenue. "

109

Morningxafter Apr 13, 2026 +103

So one of his rich friends wants to control and privatize it.

103

donofrioms Apr 13, 2026 +38

“We haven’t received federal funds since 2013, the legislation that created the Presidio Trust was written in a fashion that it had to pay for itself by 2013 and it did,” Buell said. Which then begs the question, why is a federally fund board of trusts needed?

38

radiodmr Apr 13, 2026 +30

That's their job. To manage the Presidio, maintaining it's public uses and rents, so that it doesn't need federal funding. That's literally the job of the board.

30

MiloGoesToTheFatFarm Apr 13, 2026 +233

Trump: I want you to rename the Golden Gate Bridge, “Trump Bridge!” Presidio Board: No. Trump: You’re fired.

233

qdp Apr 13, 2026 +13

The Golden Pee Tape Bridge it is then.

13

Tomdoerr88 Apr 13, 2026 +3

He was probably just so angry when he found out it wasn’t made of actual gold

3

crafty_alias Apr 13, 2026 +1

Lmao, it's so crazy that I can imagine him actually writing an executive order to demolish the Golden Gate Bridge and rebuild it with solid gold. I can picture the people around him telling him it's a great idea.

1

BareNakedSole Apr 13, 2026 +110

That’ll get gas prices moving in the right direction…….

110

Mac62961 Apr 13, 2026 +149

Anything decent or is not getting cash from he just does not like

149

Frodojj Apr 13, 2026 +94

This was revenue neutral too. They haven’t received federal funds for over a decade.

94

ChaoticSenior Apr 13, 2026 +16

Development maybe?

16

Worthyness Apr 13, 2026 +10

Its in california, so it has to go.

10

Strawbuddy Apr 13, 2026 +11

Santa Francisco so Bay area, tech billionaire adjacent extortion/protection scheme. He's gonna shake down the Bay area for it's real estate

11

clownshow59 Apr 13, 2026 +84

To me it seems like he’s trying to set California up to be completely helpless versus fires.

84

rinderblock Apr 13, 2026 +79

The presidio itself sits right against the bay, it’s a beautiful and fairly lush park and therefore a pretty low fire risk relative to other national park land in other parts of the Bay Area. More likely this is just a chaos grenade being tossed at one of the jewels in San Francisco’s public and tourist frequented crown. Same tactic being used with Alcatraz.

79

funkyloki Apr 13, 2026 +31

He wants to build a luxury hotel there. Just watch. That's what he wants.

31

Hungry_Bat_2230 Apr 13, 2026 +3

He did this as retribution against Nancy Pelosi. She was the one who led the effort to create the Presidio Trust decades ago.

3

rinderblock Apr 13, 2026 +1

ok then that means it definitely wasnt him, or at least thats not how he made the connection. I think its more that picking on SF is easy points with his base.

1

Alexis_J_M Apr 13, 2026 +27

The assumption in the chatter I'm hearing is that Trump plans to bulldoze as much as he can of this beloved public land to build things he and his friends can make profit from. There's also the suggestion that he is doing it just to spite Gavin Newsome and other California politicians he has a grudge against, which unfortunately would be deeply in character for him.

27

Maoleficent Apr 13, 2026 +47

The First Felon does nothing but tweet, golf and spew ignorance. These types of things are the Project 2025 trolls who have been mapping out how to eat America alive from the inside out and destroy everything good that used to believe we were.

47

jpric155 Apr 13, 2026 +17

Bro is speed running his "king time" before Congress flips in the midterms and we get some sensible checks and balances.

17

Not_Legal_Chops Apr 13, 2026 +17

They gonna tear the place apart for high end housing and condos for rich ass motherfuckers.

17

pudding7 Apr 13, 2026 +2

If I was hired to bulldoze the Presidio, I'd be worried about being torn apart by the local people.

2

brickyardjimmy Apr 13, 2026 +30

Well. He did such a good job with the Kennedy Center, I'm sure this'll go well too.

30

ACorania Apr 13, 2026 +12

So it won't be maintained, he'll try and do something corrupt and it will all be tied up in court while it degrades until a new admin comes in?

12

kb7384 Apr 13, 2026 +10

Making way for the Yarvin/Theil technocracy, I see.

10

Ecstatic_Wasabi_5166 Apr 13, 2026 +15

Trump firing people isn't even surprising anymore

15

Lahm0123 Apr 13, 2026 +14

And he will replace them with stupid sycophants.

14

boot2skull Apr 13, 2026 +6

New c***** in San Francisco inbound.

6

EffingNewDay Apr 13, 2026 +5

Is he gonna try to make it an army base again? That’ll be a hilarious flop.

5

VaguelyArtistic Apr 13, 2026 +6

Well it won’t be a prison because he already wants to reopen Alcatraz. Hopefully the legal challenges will grind this to a halt.

6

CarlosAVP Apr 13, 2026 +11

Let me guess: gonna build a golf course?

11

the_skies_falling Apr 13, 2026 +10

It already has one

10

Morningxafter Apr 13, 2026 +2

Then he’s gonna slap his name on it.

2

peter303_ Apr 13, 2026 +4

Soon to become a golf course with a marble and gold clubhouse.

4

Soggy-State-9554 Apr 13, 2026 +4

A trust... So now a bank account or large piece of real estate is... Unmanaged? With MAGA vultures running around?

4

Big-Branch-9901 Apr 13, 2026 +13

Same old same old. What else do you expect from him?

13

rogman1970 Apr 13, 2026 +9

Looks like someone told the orange a*** no

9

NoProNoah Apr 13, 2026 +3

Well I don’t like that one bit.

3

MizunoHawk Apr 13, 2026 +3

Where are the rest of the Epstein Files? He causes confusion, fear, and discord to distract

3

Money_Tune6300 Apr 13, 2026 +3

Release epstein files

3

El_Chingon214 Apr 13, 2026 +4

Dementia Don at it again.

4

SomeSamples Apr 13, 2026 +2

This is about the golf course there right?

2

yourwishbag Apr 13, 2026 +1

It sounds like a lot of this is based on assumptions rather than confirmed actions. Concern about public land is valid, but it’s probably more productive to focus on verified plans or proposals instead of attributing motives without clear evidence.

1

grape_crustable Apr 13, 2026 +1

Is he gonna make it the Trump Presidio?

1

dubbleplusgood Apr 13, 2026 +1

Soon to be renamed by him as The Board of Presidio Donald J. Trump.

1

kriptoez Apr 13, 2026 +1

Who knows why, but don't forget Presidio has a rich history of child sexual abuse as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_A._Aquino

1

frosted1030 Apr 13, 2026 +1

He's so scared that anyone will speak out against him..

1

Trump fires entire San Francisco Presidio Trust board

💬 Send a Message

164 Comments