ListNook

JohnBrownSurvivor 9 hr ago +2997

How does he actually have the power to fire all these people? Or does he just say he wants them fired and whoever is in control of that institution just goes ahead and does what he wants?

2997

tropicsun 9 hr ago +1881

Or how he can single handily cancel organizations like the national forest service… or sell public land.

1881

MACHOmanJITSU 8 hr ago +1424

But Biden can’t tweak some loan terms for student borrowers.. f*** the Supreme Tabernacle.

1424

Primsun 8 hr ago +235

The secret is just to redo it every month with a new legal justification or batshit theory ... or just delete the data and close the account I guess.

235

BirdLawyer50 8 hr ago +66

Yeah the trick is just do it and let everyone against it fight it out. Literally. Just do it. Biden could’ve ordered 0% interest and just didn’t because he was timid

66

MongooseBrigadier 8 hr ago +156

"because he was timid" No, because it was illegal and he respected the rule of law. Just because it is more effective in the short term to do illegal things, doesn't mean that's good for democracy or a functioning state.

156

BirdLawyer50 8 hr ago +25

I’ll accept they were trying to do things lawfully but also bent over backwards to not even attempt something even vaguely creative to approach ch a perceived problem. It truly felt like “we have tried nothing and run out of ideas”

25

mrpenchant 6 hr ago +68

He forgave over $180 billion in student loan debt and he introduced the SAVE repayment plan to help people out further. Saying he did nothing is absolute nonsense.

68

JailhouseMamaJackson 7 hr ago +42

Did you miss where Biden DID attempt even more than he did for student loans and it got overturned?

42

Kryptosis 2 hr ago +1

This is BS. I had a path to actually repay with Biden. Trump fucked that as soon as he could. So my parents said f*** it and spent my inheritance paying off the loans they talked me into years ago.

1

Illustrious-Tower849 2 hr ago +1

Right because he was timid

1

outerproduct 8 hr ago +17

Or, you know, not batshit insane.

17

K10RumbleRumble 8 hr ago +6

I honestly hope that it’s all so muddy and fucked at this point, whoever the hell shows up to attempt to salvage this dumpster fire just has to hit the reset button.

6

deepasleep 6 hr ago +4

Because he wasn’t a lawless piece of shit.

4

annuidhir 5 hr ago +2

He..did order 0% interest? It was called the SAVE repayment plan or something.That's what I've had for years now. Though, the Trump administration just ended that, so I have to change my repayment plan by June..

2

ProfNesbitt 8 hr ago +48

This is my biggest problem no one is willing to do the “illegal” stuff for the side of good. When Biden forgave student loans he should have ordered all the records of the loans destroyed as well and had it done before a court could rule on it.

48

mrpenchant 6 hr ago +24

I am not saying I don’t want my politicians to be more effective but how can supporting leaders just ignoring all laws and doing whatever they want actually be a good solution?

24

nachosmind 5 hr ago +2

You can’t bring a knife to a gun fight, you can’t half measure against fascists. They made the first move by pardoning January 6th people who now are ready and can convince others Trump will save them even if they bend the rules of law. Biden / Democrats could’ve created extreme loyalty for 18-30 year olds but now doesn’t have that at a pivotal moment.

2

mrpenchant 5 hr ago +16

You aren’t suggesting fighting fascism, you are suggesting becoming fascist though. You are just saying we should support people to be “good” fascists. Fighting fascists would be prosecuting those who have committed crimes and changing the system to prevent a repeat of events, not claiming absolute power for your dictator.

16

fevered_visions 5 hr ago +6

> This is my biggest problem no one is willing to do the “illegal” stuff for the side of good. ["Let anyone who wishes the republic to be safe, come with me \[to f****** murder the jackass who is currently wrecking politics\]"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Senatus_consultum_ultimum)

6

thoughtfractals85 8 hr ago +11

Oh, supreme tabernacle is so good! I'm using that.

11

goonSquad15 8 hr ago +76

because congress is spineless and worried about going against trump

76

pigeieio 8 hr ago +68

Not spineless, complicit. They are on board for this. If they where not spineless they would be out publicly supporting and drawing attention to their part and really explaining to their constituents what they are doing to them and their constitution.

68

EvoEpitaph 7 hr ago +5

Agreed, spineless will be their "defense" when the tables turn and accountability is on the table. But it's 100% complicit.

5

winklesnad31 8 hr ago +16

He made massive cuts and forced moves no one wanted, but the Forest Service still exists. For now.

16

haveanairforceday 8 hr ago +21

Our society doesnt view government as primarily the rule of law, we think of it as the rule of the ruler. We have been lucky that the rulers before this one were principled enough that they tried to follow the law

21

crossdtherubicon 2 hr ago +1

This deserves more attention. I would add: people wrongly assume the President as being the central figure of government. And the President's unique powers do not in itself make the position the central mechanism of legislation. In conjunction with that false belief, Congress continues to allow the President to amalgamate more powers that traditionally the position did not have. By doing so, the President has become more powerful in practice but, not on paper. Congress has been passing less legislation - ie. doing less work - as more money has entered politics and they focus on fundraising. So, Presidents take advantage of that both in campaigning (they as an individual will fix the problems) and in their expanded powers as President (unchecked legal overreaches).

1

Yvaelle 5 hr ago +3

He can't, but every Republican in the country does anything he want. He isn't singlehandedly doing anything. 80 million Americans are gleefully ignoring the laws to obey his cult

3

UbiSububi8 9 hr ago +678

We need to significantly reduce the power of the president.

678

Capt1an_Cl0ck 9 hr ago +232

Yes. And yes.

232

Individual_Bell_4637 9 hr ago +214

The good news is, it wouldn't be that difficult. A properly functioning Congress seriously constrains the President's power. Unfortunately, they have not chosen to do so for quite awhile now.

214

KidOcelot 9 hr ago +27

Soo reduce presidential, and congressional powers? Im a little daring today, so maybe add in a third institution similar to Congress and House, to balance things out?

27

pcj 9 hr ago +41

I think allowing better recall/no-confidence options would be a good step. And also moving away from first-past-the-post voting options to encourage third party options.

41

TBTrpt3 8 hr ago +14

How about we stop letting the House go on recess for so long? I'm in favor of not giving them any break longer than a 3 day weekend. That's all I get, why should they get more?

14

Effective_Quail_3946 8 hr ago +9

And no benefits, no pensions if they shut down congress

9

pcj 7 hr ago +4

Causing Congress to go without pay/benefits in these scenarios would just strengthen the power of lobbyists, I fear

4

pcj 8 hr ago +8

I mean, I'm all for if they can't pass a real budget, then they immediately get recalled.

8

Individual_Bell_4637 9 hr ago +14

I'm not sure how you can reduce Congressional power without empowering the executive. Have judges make every call? The Constitution is pretty clear that Congress has primacy in lawmaking, spending, and war. In theory, Congress is the only branch that we control directly. You will never ever speak to the President, or a Supreme Court justice, but it doesn't take all that much effort to speak to your elected representatives personally. I don't know that we would want to reduce their power. It's more about getting them to actually exert it.

14

pubsky 8 hr ago +5

Or make it impossible for another branch to exert the powers of the other. It's pretty messed up that our supreme court has decided that if the legislature doesn't exercise it's power, it is fine to let the president or the court assume the power.

5

FinndBors 3 hr ago +2

I think the DoJ needs clear independence from both congress and the president. An independent DoJ would help tremendously right now.

2

Individual_Bell_4637 9 hr ago +3

I once read a crazy idea that I loved. A 3rd house of Congress, made up of citizens selected jury-duty style to serve one year.

3

cyvaquero 8 hr ago +8

The House of Representatives is the people’s house and the same people that would be in that proposed “jury pool” voted for who is in the House. If you think picking randos would be an improvement you really need remember that roughly half the population is below average intelligence.

8

Individual_Bell_4637 8 hr ago +3

So, the people in Congress for the last 10 years are high intelligence? I'll take my chances. And there is a big big difference in the House. They are people who want to be politicians.

3

greenman5252 8 hr ago +5

Seems like the Republicans support what the leader of their party is doing since they control all the levers in the house, Senate, and Supreme Court

5

Individual_Bell_4637 8 hr ago +1

Yes, I agree. I'm including this current Congress among many others in recent past as being way too agreeable with Presidents of their own party. Which is to be expected to some extent, of course. And there's always been a power of the 'bully pulpit', or the 'pen and phone'. But there was a time when Congressional leaders expected to set their own legislative agenda, even when the President shared their party affiliation. The President reacted to Congressional priorities. For a lot of years now, it has been the other way around.

1

full_bodied_muppet 8 hr ago +5

Congress has actively stripped away its own power in favor of the president for decades now. One party continued operating under the honor system and the other has been salivating about it, and we're experiencing the direct result.

5

Individual_Bell_4637 8 hr ago +1

I agree with your first sentence completely.

1

Cormacolinde 8 hr ago +6

Chosen? Congress hasn’t been a democratic body for a while. The US was an oligarchy long before Trump.

6

Capt1an_Cl0ck 8 hr ago +2

Spineless Republican bootlickers.

2

dejavuamnesiac 9 hr ago +1

Congress will always be limited by MAGA State reps. The power of the entire federal government needs to be reduced. States Rights! Coalitions of Blue States can check an out of control Fed. Nothing in the constitution requires such a huge federal gov

1

bros402 6 hr ago +2

Let's repeal the Reapportionment Act of 1929 and adopt the Wyoming Rule.

2

Individual_Bell_4637 8 hr ago +3

I'm right there with you, all in on that idea. Have been for decades, and it's good to see folks on both sides of the aisle seeing the value there. If nothing else, at least local leaders are easier to primary/recall/persuade than national ones with large gerrymandered enclaves of safe votes to sit on. ETA: I would even take your statement a step further, and say that the Constitution clearly intends to privilige State governments over the federal government, with the stated exceptions of certain functions, such as defense and import/export control.

3

Gay_Giraffe_1773 9 hr ago +172

The President actually legally has very little power. What is happening is outside the bounds of legality and is just happening because the so called "checks and balances" we have are just handshake agreements with no teeth when the people who are supposed to do the checking and balancing are complicit.

172

the_sneaky_artist 9 hr ago +27

Just "handshake agreements with no teeth" means he actually does have a lot of power.

27

Kaffe-Mumriken 8 hr ago +14

You fell into the same trap of “the president is a good faith actor”

14

eliz1bef 9 hr ago +50

He's doing things the president doesn't actually have the power to do and people are just rolling over like friendly dogs and peeing themselves.

50

thefuzzhead 9 hr ago +17

That means prying the patriot act out of their 80 year old corrupt little fingers.

17

LowerRhubarb 9 hr ago +14

More like prying Citizen's United out of their malicious clawed hands. The moment that c*** passed bribery became legal.

14

T1442 9 hr ago +7

They don't have the power to forgive student loans or help people in any way.

7

jwely 8 hr ago +28

**This is a wild miss.** The president does NOT have this power, but a Republican Congress and stacked/stolen Republican supreme court that makes up our "checks and balances" has willfully conceeded this power to him. A measure they will certainly undo the moment their special boy isn't in the Whitehouse anymore. Republicans **as a party** are going to try and pin this on one horrible man who is certain to grow into his role of being universally hated, and the American people are so fuckig stupid that it's going to work. In a just world, it would mean the complete extinction of the Republican party (and quite possibly the Democratic party too) due to sweeping election reform that made room for 6+ viable parties to form and thrive like every other healthy democracy on earth has.

28

JohnBrownSurvivor 9 hr ago +20

Seriously! Every time I would see the Democrats giving more power to the president, even when they are in power (and a democratic president would never use that power anyway), I would just be screaming at the wall that all they were doing was giving power to a future Republican president so that it can be abused. And that is exactly what the orange a****** is doing right now. He's abusing power as fast as he can left and right, just to prove that he can and just to destroy as much as possible. Something tells me he knows he's going to hell, and he's trying to make it so that Satan cedes his rule of hell to Trump as soon as he gets there.

20

CondescendingShitbag 8 hr ago +3

Kevin McCarthy would really like to know why the Democrats would allow this.

3

Ltjenkins 8 hr ago +2

Don’t those powers already not exist? There just isn’t the rest of the government to challenge/restrict on these proclamations? We live in a world where he can just executive order away amendments of the constitution but that’s not how it works.

2

pushaper 7 hr ago +2

Americans catching up to 2003?

2

UbiSububi8 6 hr ago +1

Better late than never?

1

Kaarl_Mills 9 hr ago +2

I'd say abolish the office at this point

2

mattxb 8 hr ago +1

We already did then congress and the supreme court gave their power to trump to do whatever he wants

1

RayzTheRoof 7 hr ago +1

Most of what he does isn't even within the powers of the president. It's just that no one tells him no.

1

matthieuC 3 hr ago +1

Just wait for a President to get elected and the supreme court will now say the president is a symbolic figure,

1

dejavuamnesiac 9 hr ago

I’d say reduce the power of the entire federal government and move everything possible to the States or coalitions of States. Otherwise every time MAGA gets back in power they just destroy anything federal that was rebuilt and they pardon all the criminals. Any federal crime can generally be prosecuted at the State level.

0

UbiSububi8 7 hr ago +2

Republicans have been trying to shift stuff from federal to state for decades. Especially when they couldn’t win federally. If this was policy, some states might not have civil rights.

2

StoicWoobie 9 hr ago +168

The Presidio Trust is a federal agency and it's board of directors is appointed either directly or indirectly by the president. I believe the directors serve at the pleasure of the president and thus can be dismissed by the president.

168

Unusual_Flounder2073 9 hr ago +105

Usually the new trustees are selected so there can be a handoff. But as usual the president uses chaos to destroy our national institutions.

105

badwolf1013 8 hr ago +13

He probably just found this out (from Stephen Miller, I’m sure,) and decided to replace them with his “friends” (aka people who can enrich him.)

13

tremere110 9 hr ago +71

They are federal national park employees. As president he has the authority to fire them. Unfortunately.

71

Eastern-Manner-1640 9 hr ago +8

doesn't the park service have a legislatively defined structure and purpose that can't be carried out with no employees?

8

Xeorm124 8 hr ago +2

There's no details on how long it can go without a director or other such employees. And if they dislike the way it is being managed it would be on Congress to legislate and enforce their will on the Executive. In practice they seem fine with it and don't think it'll blow back on them in the polls, so it's fine to do so. Nonenforcement of laws by the executive to nullify them is a pretty common practice. The uncommon bit is doing it with relatively popular laws like the national park service.

2

Zipps0 9 hr ago +21

If you read the article they were expecting to get replaced at some point and were essentially acting as stand in’s until new board members were selected to replace them. They had some class in the statements the released as well. It’s more the manner in which Trump is acting.

21

Material_Reach_8827 7 hr ago +14

Enough liberals stayed home or voted 3rd party in 2016 that Republicans got to appoint 3 hardline SCOTUS justices, tipping the court 6-3 conservative for decades (when it could've been 5-4 liberal). These people then proceeded to overturn old precedent or make up new rules to grant the president even more power, and it's responsible for basically everything that's happened since then. In particular there's a pending SCOTUS case that's almost certainly going to go Trump's way which will prevent Congress from placing any restrictions on a president's ability to fire most appointees, except probably for the ones conservatives care about (e.g. Federal Reserve).

14

JohnBrownSurvivor 7 hr ago +3

And then, the SCOTUS will try to reverse themselves as soon as a Democrat gets elected. You know, if we ever have elections again.

3

spectra2000_ 8 hr ago +3

Most of the time he doesn’t, but those responsible for keeping him in line and telling him no are either cowards or in league with him

3

long-da-schlong 9 hr ago +2

Yes, the second one

2

bros402 6 hr ago +2

Some of the people decide to actually listen to him when he says it (when he doesn't have the power to do it). Or they resign in protest.

2

JohnBrownSurvivor 3 hr ago +1

And they should NEVER resign in protest. Rise to follow the illegal/immoral order and force then to fire you.

1

MillHall78 7 hr ago +3

He was able to disband the US Forest Service because the US Department of Agriculture controls it & that's the industry that destroyed US farms by reducing their human consumption crops over our lifetimes to just 20%, with around half of that exported. It's one of our most corrupt departments. Something should also be said about the culture of Americans never bothering to start class action lawsuits.

3

bigginz87 3 hr ago +1

Presidio is federal land, just like Ocean beach and other areas I can't remember at the moment

1

Alexis_J_M 2 hr ago +1

The board is appointed by the president and serves at his pleasure. Normally this isn't a heavily politicized position, but Trump weaponizes or commercializes everything he can.

1

RottenPingu1 9 hr ago +2907

He doesn't even know what they are. This is someone else.

2907

dubbzy104 9 hr ago +685

He thought it was the San Francisco President Trust

685

RoarOfTheWorlds 9 hr ago +101

Ex-President Trust will rue the day he walked afoul of big strong dear leader 💪

101

Max_Trollbot_ 3 hr ago +3

I though the Ex-Presidents only robbed banks and surfed

3

boot2skull 8 hr ago +44

Presidio? I never understood that Phil Collins song.

44

Nonconformists 8 hr ago +38

It’s about a girl he met in the Stu-stu-studio

38

Flip_d_Byrd 7 hr ago +6

And she was a stu-stu-stutterer.

6

ClayQuarterCake 7 hr ago +7

Or the San Presidio Landscaping

7

hkohne 5 hr ago +5

Does SF even have four seasons? Or Four Seasons? Of any kind? And I don't think "fog" can be counted as a season.

5

Uhhhhh55 9 hr ago +233

Stephen Miller

233

RottenPingu1 9 hr ago +105

I think you are right. That guy is dangerous.

105

schlamster 7 hr ago +93

Oh you mean the guy who is an unelected official who moved into military housing at the beginning of the administration to “protect his family” — think about that. He knew that what they were about to hatch over these next few years was SO EGREGIOUS that he pre emptively moved his family onto a military base as a civilian advisor.

93

Uncle_Hephaestus 8 hr ago +104

probably the nazi traitor Steve Miller.

104

dogsanddogsanddogsan 9 hr ago +47

One of those freedoms cities with no laws that’s just for billionaires and their slaves

47

NaiveChoiceMaker 9 hr ago +44

Libertarian cities have never worked out. They’ll never work out.

44

FreeUsePolyDaddy 8 hr ago +32

Bears love them though.

32

My_Name_Is_Steven 8 hr ago +15

and fire.

15

nuixy 2 hr ago +1

Peter Thiel has offices there.

1

jvs8380 9 hr ago +185

Next, he’ll announce he’s building a Trump Presidio Hotel just to own the libs

185

_bk_adv 9 hr ago +1709

He literally called environmentalists terrorists. He’s a disgusting human being.

1709

winterwolf2010 9 hr ago +458

Trump “is” an environmental terrorist. He’s hazardous to the environment.

458

VentureQuotes 9 hr ago +97

Trump IS an environmental terrorist

97

kstargate-425 8 hr ago +40

His tweet during the snow storm of the NE on Jan 23, 2026 was ironic considering weeks later the country hit new record highs across almost the whole country lol Trump tweet: >***Record Cold Wave expected to hit 40 States. Rarely seen anything like it before. Could the Environmental Insurrectionists please explain - WHATEVER HAPPENED TO GLOBAL WARMING???***

40

gwazmalurk 9 hr ago +385

Next shiny object seen by the Kleptocracy

385

Dandan0005 9 hr ago +94

Yep it’s prime real estate and I have no doubt he wants to get his grubby little fingers all over it

94

justabill71 7 hr ago +12

And it has a golf course.

12

JC2535 9 hr ago +118

This is about building luxury homes and hotels.

118

Upstairs_Baby8424 6 hr ago +36

Nobody is going to build there because by time this goes through the entire process and a Democrat comes in they’re just going to undo everything. Developers be damned. I also think the state will step in at some point as well and put up roadblocks.

36

GreyBeardEng 8 hr ago +109

"The Presidio Trust Board of Directors governs a federal agency established in 1996 to manage and rehabilitate the 1,500-acre former military post, the Presidio of San Francisco. It operates the site—containing hiking trails, housing, and businesses—to ensure it is self-sustaining through leasing revenue. "

109

Morningxafter 8 hr ago +103

So one of his rich friends wants to control and privatize it.

103

donofrioms 8 hr ago +38

“We haven’t received federal funds since 2013, the legislation that created the Presidio Trust was written in a fashion that it had to pay for itself by 2013 and it did,” Buell said. Which then begs the question, why is a federally fund board of trusts needed?

38

radiodmr 5 hr ago +30

That's their job. To manage the Presidio, maintaining it's public uses and rents, so that it doesn't need federal funding. That's literally the job of the board.

30

MiloGoesToTheFatFarm 9 hr ago +233

Trump: I want you to rename the Golden Gate Bridge, “Trump Bridge!” Presidio Board: No. Trump: You’re fired.

233

qdp 6 hr ago +13

The Golden Pee Tape Bridge it is then.

13

Tomdoerr88 4 hr ago +3

He was probably just so angry when he found out it wasn’t made of actual gold

3

crafty_alias 3 hr ago +1

Lmao, it's so crazy that I can imagine him actually writing an executive order to demolish the Golden Gate Bridge and rebuild it with solid gold. I can picture the people around him telling him it's a great idea.

1

BareNakedSole 9 hr ago +110

That’ll get gas prices moving in the right direction…….

110

Mac62961 9 hr ago +149

Anything decent or is not getting cash from he just does not like

149

Frodojj 9 hr ago +94

This was revenue neutral too. They haven’t received federal funds for over a decade.

94

ChaoticSenior 9 hr ago +16

Development maybe?

16

Worthyness 8 hr ago +10

Its in california, so it has to go.

10

Strawbuddy 7 hr ago +11

Santa Francisco so Bay area, tech billionaire adjacent extortion/protection scheme. He's gonna shake down the Bay area for it's real estate

11

clownshow59 9 hr ago +84

To me it seems like he’s trying to set California up to be completely helpless versus fires.

84

rinderblock 8 hr ago +79

The presidio itself sits right against the bay, it’s a beautiful and fairly lush park and therefore a pretty low fire risk relative to other national park land in other parts of the Bay Area. More likely this is just a chaos grenade being tossed at one of the jewels in San Francisco’s public and tourist frequented crown. Same tactic being used with Alcatraz.

79

funkyloki 8 hr ago +31

He wants to build a luxury hotel there. Just watch. That's what he wants.

31

Hungry_Bat_2230 5 hr ago +3

He did this as retribution against Nancy Pelosi. She was the one who led the effort to create the Presidio Trust decades ago.

3

rinderblock 4 hr ago +1

ok then that means it definitely wasnt him, or at least thats not how he made the connection. I think its more that picking on SF is easy points with his base.

1

Alexis_J_M 8 hr ago +27

The assumption in the chatter I'm hearing is that Trump plans to bulldoze as much as he can of this beloved public land to build things he and his friends can make profit from. There's also the suggestion that he is doing it just to spite Gavin Newsome and other California politicians he has a grudge against, which unfortunately would be deeply in character for him.

27

Maoleficent 9 hr ago +47

The First Felon does nothing but tweet, golf and spew ignorance. These types of things are the Project 2025 trolls who have been mapping out how to eat America alive from the inside out and destroy everything good that used to believe we were.

47

jpric155 8 hr ago +17

Bro is speed running his "king time" before Congress flips in the midterms and we get some sensible checks and balances.

17

Not_Legal_Chops 8 hr ago +17

They gonna tear the place apart for high end housing and condos for rich ass motherfuckers.

17

pudding7 4 hr ago +2

If I was hired to bulldoze the Presidio, I'd be worried about being torn apart by the local people.

2

brickyardjimmy 9 hr ago +30

Well. He did such a good job with the Kennedy Center, I'm sure this'll go well too.

30

ACorania 8 hr ago +12

So it won't be maintained, he'll try and do something corrupt and it will all be tied up in court while it degrades until a new admin comes in?

12

kb7384 7 hr ago +10

Making way for the Yarvin/Theil technocracy, I see.

10

Ecstatic_Wasabi_5166 9 hr ago +15

Trump firing people isn't even surprising anymore

15

Lahm0123 9 hr ago +14

And he will replace them with stupid sycophants.

14

boot2skull 8 hr ago +6

New c***** in San Francisco inbound.

6

EffingNewDay 7 hr ago +5

Is he gonna try to make it an army base again? That’ll be a hilarious flop.

5

VaguelyArtistic 6 hr ago +6

Well it won’t be a prison because he already wants to reopen Alcatraz. Hopefully the legal challenges will grind this to a halt.

6

CarlosAVP 9 hr ago +11

Let me guess: gonna build a golf course?

11

the_skies_falling 9 hr ago +10

It already has one

10

Morningxafter 8 hr ago +2

Then he’s gonna slap his name on it.

2

peter303_ 6 hr ago +4

Soon to become a golf course with a marble and gold clubhouse.

4

Soggy-State-9554 5 hr ago +4

A trust... So now a bank account or large piece of real estate is... Unmanaged? With MAGA vultures running around?

4

Big-Branch-9901 9 hr ago +13

Same old same old. What else do you expect from him?

13

rogman1970 9 hr ago +9

Looks like someone told the orange a*** no

9

NoProNoah 7 hr ago +3

Well I don’t like that one bit.

3

MizunoHawk 4 hr ago +3

Where are the rest of the Epstein Files? He causes confusion, fear, and discord to distract

3

Money_Tune6300 3 hr ago +3

Release epstein files

3

El_Chingon214 8 hr ago +4

Dementia Don at it again.

4

SomeSamples 4 hr ago +2

This is about the golf course there right?

2

yourwishbag 4 hr ago +1

It sounds like a lot of this is based on assumptions rather than confirmed actions. Concern about public land is valid, but it’s probably more productive to focus on verified plans or proposals instead of attributing motives without clear evidence.

1

grape_crustable 3 hr ago +1

Is he gonna make it the Trump Presidio?

1

dubbleplusgood 3 hr ago +1

Soon to be renamed by him as The Board of Presidio Donald J. Trump.

1

kriptoez 2 hr ago +1

Who knows why, but don't forget Presidio has a rich history of child sexual abuse as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_A._Aquino

1

frosted1030 2 hr ago +1

He's so scared that anyone will speak out against him..

1

Trump fires entire San Francisco Presidio Trust board

💬 Send a Message

164 Comments