· 84 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 17, 2026 at 12:30 AM

Trump invites the leaders of Israel and Lebanon to the White House for the countries' first high-level talks since 1983

Posted by WayOutbackBoy


Trump invites the leaders of Israel and Lebanon to the White House for the countries' first high-level talks since 1983
Oskaloosa Herald
Trump invites the leaders of Israel and Lebanon to the White House for the countries' first high-level talks since 1983
Trump invites the leaders of Israel and Lebanon to the White House for the countries' first high-level talks since 1983.

🚩 Report this post

84 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
RadiumJuly Apr 17, 2026 +233
Oh boy, I hope they both like McDonalds food! But in all seriousness, I hope it is a productive meeting. Even a meeting organized by a Trump white house that leads to lasting peace is a good thing, especially if it is peace on just terms that sees Lebanon keep its territory.
233
Expln Apr 17, 2026 +76
How can it be a productive meeting? this is all performative. israel is not fighting lebanon they are fighting hezbollah. which is not going to be part of these negotations. israel is going to negotiate with a government that has ZERO influence on hezbollah and are unwilling to fight them whatsoever. so it doesn't even matter what "agreements" they come up with. hezbollah is not going to comply and the lebanese government has no power to do anything about it. This whole thing is a complete joke and will lead to nowhere.
76
Daily_Heroin_User Apr 17, 2026 +13
Yeah this is a fugazi so trump can pump the stock market like he’s doing claiming there’s going to be peace any minute now with Iran. He’s been saying all week there would be peace “in the next couple days” and still no meeting scheduled after they walked out of the last one.
13
EttinTerrorPacts Apr 17, 2026 +9
Israel and Lebanon have a shared interest in eliminating Hezbollah. Unlike Palestine (in terms of Hamas), the Lebanese government knows this, even though they have no ability to act against them. So in theory, they could look for a framework to work together
9
supx3 Apr 17, 2026 +4
It’s not performative. In the past this would have been impossible with Hezbollah’s stranglehold on the country. Just wanting to look into the cause of the massive explosion in the harbor nearly caused a civil war in the past. This is proof that Hezbollah is weak and does not control the country anymore. The Lebanese government is still worried about a civil war if they try to crackdown on Hezbollah themselves which is why they haven’t done anything significant. There is lots of work to be done but maybe, just maybe, this can lead to something good. 
4
xnmyl Apr 18, 2026 +1
If Lebanon meets with Israel, Hezbollah will probably double down and create more problems for Lebanon. I don't see the meeting happening
1
Skrivus Apr 17, 2026 -13
Fighting hezbollah...by killing a 1 year old infant at their dad's funeral...or doing a targeted strike on a anti-hezbollah leader in Beirut. They're annexing land. Settlers will move into this "buffer area" and then they'll have to annex more land in the name of the settlers to make a new buffer to protect them.
-13
Expln Apr 17, 2026 +1
Surely, surely. Then don't give them an "excuse" by keeping hezbollah around. which is terrible for lebanon anyway.
1
wildfirestopper Apr 17, 2026 -6
A bully only understands one thing. They will continue to come back for more unless you show them we won't tolerate this anymore.
-6
Lefaid Apr 17, 2026 +2
You know, that is what far right Israelis say too. Strange.
2
Expln Apr 17, 2026 +1
[ Removed by Listnook ]
1
LusciousLucyLeather Apr 17, 2026 -7
Israel is currently flattening Lebanon just like Gaza! Iran included Lebanon in the 10 point deal so both countries would be at peace but BiBi continues to bomb civilian infrastructure in the Middle East. Who knows what DT is doing. He's playing "Quien es mas macho?" when he should be getting out of the war or pushing up daisies.
-7
Virtual-History-6099 Apr 17, 2026 +35
I don't want Israel seizing territory but I also understand the rationale in occupying it minus a peace treaty. Hezbollah bombarded Israel's north, operated in the south in violation of the 2024 ceasefire, the UNIFIL peacekeepers did nothing to stop that, and same with the Lebanese army. I recall reading the testimony of a former UNIFIL peacekeeper who explained how the Lebanese army wouldn't take action against Hezbollah even when the UNIFIL reported their activity. I don't always like what Israel does but when you strip things down to the bare logic I understand the frustration of Israelis. Now granted where it gets complicated is when Israel attempts to create facts on the ground like with the Golan Heights and Syria, so on the flip side I also understand the skepticism towards Israel and landgrabs. I just want recognition of the Israeli perspective whether one agrees or disagrees. 
35
RadiumJuly Apr 17, 2026 -14
I recognize the use and efforts of peace keeping forces. I have no objections to such operations, and I think there can be a world where Israeli troops can take part in such operations to help against terrorist organizations like Hezbollah. Let's be open and honest, call a s**** and s****. They aren't doing that in Lebanon. They say that is what they are doing as a cover story. We all know this is another annexation. The very moment that they have military control of a region, they will start moving in settlers. Israel doesn't have the credibility to claim otherwise. At this point I think it would be far better to let some other country in to conduct peace keeping. Maybe Turkiye, those guys dislike Iran and its proxies such as Hezbollah, and frankly would probably treat the Lebanese people with a little more sensitivity. But that really is more up to the people of Lebanon than me, living safely in a country very far away.
-14
Virtual-History-6099 Apr 17, 2026 +39
Keep in mind Israel had settlers in the Sinai yet they still removed those people to make peace with Egypt. Israel offered to return the Golan Heights in exchange for recognition from Syria. It may be too late for that now but Israel is willing to exchange land for peace. 
39
PikachuFloorRug Apr 17, 2026 +5
> At this point I think it would be far better to let some other country in to conduct peace keeping. https://unifil.unmissions.org/en/unifil-troop-contributing-countries
5
RadiumJuly Apr 17, 2026 -13
If Lebanon is ok with a UN led peace keeping mission to replace the Israeli soldiers then I think that would be great. No issue at all with that. I don't think it is likely to happen since the UN is a slow moving machine and somebody is bound to veto every step of the way, but I like the optimism.
-13
EagleRise Apr 17, 2026 +32
Are you... Are you not aware of how well the previous peace keeping mission went? It was like in its 40th year of disarming Hezbollah i think?
32
RadiumJuly Apr 17, 2026 -26
Hey, my first suggestion was Turkiye, it was some other guy that linked the UN. Go complain to him. My point has always been that whoever you send in should be with the consent of the Lebanese people.
-26
PikachuFloorRug Apr 17, 2026 +14
> My point has always been that whoever you send in should be with the consent of the Lebanese people. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_1701 > The Lebanese cabinet unanimously approved the resolution on 12 August 2006.
14
RadiumJuly Apr 17, 2026 -4
You do realize that you aren't saying anything? Just linking a prior resolution doesn't actually mean anything. Use your words buddy.
-4
PikachuFloorRug Apr 17, 2026 +27
> Just linking a prior resolution doesn't actually mean anything It's a UN resolution to send UN troops (UNIFIL) which included your suggested Turkiye to help the Lebanese Army disarm Hezbollah and remove them from southern Lebanon. Lebanon agreed to it. Here we are nearly 20 years later, and neither the Lebanese army nor UNIFIL removed or disarmed Hezbollah.
27
EmperorChaos Apr 17, 2026 +5
We don’t want turkey in our country.
5
theummeower Apr 17, 2026 +3
This is another meeting like Zelenskyy at the Whitehouse. They’re going to tell Lebanon to surrender their territory and let Israel do what they want
3
RadiumJuly Apr 17, 2026
I hope so. Having it so clear and in plain sight, for all to see, would be refreshing, I'm tired of the deniability. Having them outright state in front of the media their goals of annexation would really help show everybody exactly what is going on. Zelenskyy being asked to say thank you was a wake up moment for a lot of people, showing that the Trump regime was no friend to Ukraine. I can only hope Lebanon is afforded the same sincerity.
0
tierciel Apr 17, 2026 +2
If he isn't also inviting Hezbollah leadership it'll just be PR and photo ops. Lebanese government doesn't control Hezbollah and can't stop them from attacking or defending themselves. Israel isn't going to just go back home and leave Lebanon alone unless they're convinced Hezbollah is completely disarmed. So I doubt there will be much productive conversation. That being said I hope I'm wrong.
2
PersimmonWorried2155 Apr 17, 2026 +1
They can meet in the East Wing. Oh wait…
1
TheSoupThief Apr 17, 2026 +1
You're a fantasist
1
iamnotafbiagnt Apr 17, 2026
He’s gonna give them all cold quarter pounders with no veg and a Diet Coke…
0
morerelativebacons Apr 17, 2026
It's just gonna be weird McDonald's.
0
728766 Apr 17, 2026 +66
>Israel: Disarm Hezbollah.  >Lebanon: No. That’ll be it.
66
Individual_Rip_54 Apr 17, 2026 +43
Lebanon couldn’t do that even if they wanted to do (which they actually probably do)
43
az78 Apr 17, 2026 +15
They need to invite Lebanon and Hezbollah to the White House for peace talks. The conflict with Israel is only a result of the Lebanese government couldn't contain the parasite that is Hezbollah from having de facto control of the rest of the state.
15
Individual_Rip_54 Apr 17, 2026 +1
Israel is acting like maniacs so they definitely need to be involved . I’m just not sure how having Israel meet with the Lebanese government helps.
1
AceAv81 Apr 17, 2026 -5
"The bombings will continue, until our relationship improves"
-5
enigmaticowl Apr 17, 2026 +26
Israel: Disarm Hezbollah. Lebanon: Ok. Lebanon: \*doesn’t\*
26
ForsakenRacism Apr 17, 2026 +6
Nah Lebanon will agree but they can’t enforce it
6
KopOut Apr 17, 2026 +5
No *thank you They are sticklers for manners at the White House
5
Copacetic_Chaos Apr 17, 2026 +7
Yes, they are sticklers for manners. That’s why Trump posted, “*Please* open the f****** Straight, you crazy bastards, or you’ll be living in Hell. *Thank you*.” /s
7
xnmyl Apr 18, 2026 +1
Lebanon would love for Hezbollah to be gone. They simply have no power to do so
1
WardenEdgewise Apr 17, 2026 +17
Will they just sit there in the Oval Office with Trump, while trump shits his pants and forces them to sit there and smell it? Are those the “high level” talks?
17
oshikandela Apr 17, 2026 -3
It's more like Isreal will whisper something into Trump's ear, Trump repeating half off what they said only to drift off and talk about Ivanka and the peace price and canines and windmills. Then he will leave. Leaving both representatives from Israel and Lebanon sitting awkwardly opposite each other. They'll exchange a few diplomatic words asserting their already established positions. Then the tensions in the middle East will grow
-3
drinkduffdry Apr 17, 2026 +26
This is good, in a sea of bad, but still good.
26
CommonBasilisk Apr 17, 2026 +18
Really? Look at how they treated Zelenskyy.
18
stuartullman Apr 17, 2026 +1
i doubt they will do that, i feel the goal here is more of a performance to show iran that if they play ball they'll get "royalty" treatment as well.
1
JetKeel Apr 17, 2026 -4
I wish I could have this optimism. But I’m banking on either Trump blowing it or Israel making untenable demands and then strutting around like they own the place.
-4
kamcknig Apr 17, 2026 +3
Trump invites Lebanon to be bullied by US and Israel 
3
Nurse_Hatchet Apr 17, 2026 +5
This is a good move. I hope they have a rare moment of competence and help facilitate a productive conversation.
5
TripMaster478 Apr 17, 2026 +15
Do NOT go to the White House. They treat every leader like absolute shit, and will try to pressure you into a bad deal.
15
NfiniteNsight Apr 17, 2026 +3
Not if you're Bibi.
3
aluke000 Apr 17, 2026 +5
What good is it to invite the Lebanese leaders when they have no control over Hezbollah? They are powerless to tell them what to do or to stop doing.
5
BaconISgoodSOGOOD Apr 17, 2026 +2
To celebrate this momentous occasion, Israel will be gifting top of the line smartphones to Lebanese leaders partaking in this meeting.
2
BaronVonStevie Apr 17, 2026 +4
every once in a while I think "is it so bad that Trump might do the right thing just to stick it to his critics?" and then I remember that, no, that never ever happens and he always finds a way to f*** things up worse.
4
jest4fun Apr 17, 2026 +5
The sad sack of mashed yams desperation is palpable.  Clutching at straws. Epstein diversion is taking its toll.
5
threep03k64 Apr 17, 2026 +4
Unless the talks are how to work together to disarm Hezbollah, it all feels a bit meaningless. You can make all the agreements and positive statements you want, but the reality is that Lebanon lacks control over its own territory so is in no position to resolve the cause of the conflict. I'd love to be proven wrong. I'd love UNIFIL to actually serve a f****** purpose. But I don't know what these talks can really achieve.
4
clown_stalker Apr 17, 2026 +1
They gonna have JD, or some other shlup, asking why they haven’t said thank you yet and why they’re not in suits wearing MAGA merch?
1
ladymorgahnna Apr 17, 2026 +1
What a joke.
1
boilerdam Apr 17, 2026 +1
Oh nice! I bet they’re staying at Trump International! /s
1
Mister_Spacely Apr 17, 2026 +1
They better say “Thank you” and wear a suit ^/s
1
bryans_alright Apr 17, 2026 +1
Trump you are not Jimmy Carter!
1
Afgb89 Apr 17, 2026 +1
Something tells me that ICE might be around to verify the status of the lebanese delegations
1
Picnut Apr 17, 2026 +1
And if they can't get there because of there being no jet fuel available..
1
nova8808 Apr 17, 2026 +1
We need a dennis rodman of the middle east
1
llamajava Apr 18, 2026 +1
Happy Meals for EVERYONE!!!
1
EmptyVolition242 Apr 17, 2026
This isn't gonna lead to anything.
0
PokeballSoHard Apr 17, 2026 +1
Hes gonna torpedo it
1
Aretirednurse81 Apr 17, 2026 +1
Happy meals for everyone, yuck.
1
LincolnHighwater Apr 17, 2026 +1
To the White House? Why not to a nice MMA fight?
1
zealousshad Apr 17, 2026 +1
Lets hope for a joint battle plan v Hezbollah
1
FedBySheep Apr 17, 2026 +1
That would be the goal, approximately
1
Easik Apr 17, 2026 -1
Isn't Bibi wanted for war crimes & wasn't there something about him getting arrested if he landed in New York?
-1
carpuzz Apr 17, 2026
i think Trump would invite lebron james for the occasion..
0
NYGiants181 Apr 17, 2026
This mother f***** really loves focusing his time on countries that AREN’T the United States
0
Adept-Mulberry-8720 Apr 17, 2026 -1
Trump is out of his league. He will fail totally as in Iran, Venezuela, Greenland and probably Cuba! Hey, Trump: stick to home matters and let everyone else deal with the world you fucked up!
-1
pghtopas Apr 17, 2026 +4
Yet the Abraham Accords were a massive step towards peace.
4
TylerBourbon Apr 17, 2026 -4
Why? So Trump, Vance, and Bibi can all gang up on the leaders of Lebanon and tell them how they have no cards?
-4
Moveyourbloominass Apr 17, 2026 -5
This sick f*** has an arrest warrant out for crimes against humanity, and the United States inviting him. This is seriously fucked up. Trump's flaunting this to the other ICC members. Truly time to invoke the 25th!
-5
FedBySheep Apr 17, 2026 -1
Trump is plainly an obnoxious fool, but that people let their hatred for him override positive opportunities like this makes them just as stupid as he is.
-1
Carbonga Apr 17, 2026 -2
Just to have the leaders of Lebanon immediately being taken into custody for bullshit reasons and Trump become the king of Lebanon?
-2
vivianhtlee Apr 17, 2026 -3
Disarm? How good it works in the West Bank? The West doesn't even get to know their tragedy unless they or their allies are counterattacked. I'm not supporting terrorism. But I've started to think that it might not be possible to end terrorism when it is the only method through which the Middle East is perceived.
-3
vivianhtlee Apr 17, 2026 +1
A realistic approach is let the Lebanon government holds the army. The government keeps the army under control and maintains ability to protect themselves and counterattack if they're under attack or "settled".
1
FedBySheep Apr 17, 2026 +1
> Disarm? How good it works in the West Bank? Better than Gaza
1
Saganists Apr 17, 2026 -4
2 bullies invite person over to talk about how they could stop being bullied.
-4
vancityjeep Apr 17, 2026 -6
High level talks about his shitty taste and even shittier ballroom?
-6
← Back to Board