Leaders who don’t resign are complicit in these crimes.
24
JeffSteinMusicApr 2, 2026
+24
another episode of “Things That Can And Will Happen When The Vast Majority* Of Free-Willed Adults In America Absolutely Refuse To Care About Their Own Governance”
[32% voted Republican in 2024 + 37% couldn’t be bothered to vote at all = 69% = Vast Majority]
24
neutrino71Apr 2, 2026
+11
How can it be a war crime if it's not even a war?
MAGA's next slogan
11
ceemeebonnieApr 2, 2026
+2
[ Removed by Listnook ]
2
Tetris_PeteApr 3, 2026
+2
We had no choice, Biden made us do it.
2
InterviewNo3538Apr 3, 2026
+4
This is probably why they fired that army chief.
4
SarnseregApr 3, 2026
+1
So at what point do the world leaders call him out and damn the consequences of offending his fragile ego?
1
chemicaxeroApr 3, 2026
+1
Do people remember what happened to the Nazi leadership during the Nuremberg trials? Yeah..
1
GeshtiannaSGApr 3, 2026
+1
I remember one of them getting a charge dropped because the US did the same.
1
jcpopmApr 3, 2026
Well you see that bridge could be used to transport enriched uranium so it had to go.
0
Thrown_Account_Apr 2, 2026
-7
Well bridges are considered civilian infrastructure it is also considered military at the same time. It is not a war crime to attack bridges in war.
-7
KyzzzApr 2, 2026
+18
This was an unfinished civilian highway bridge, multiple sources indicate this bridge wasn't even operational yet, so the US's claim that this bridge was used to "transport missiles" is another one of their many lies. But even if you accept the "dual-use" framing, international humanitarian law doesn't give you a blank check to destroy it. You still have to satisfy proportionality: 8 civilians killed and 95 wounded, struck with 2,000-pound JDAMs on Sizdah Bedar — a national holiday when families are outdoors - followed by a second strike while rescue workers were still pulling people from the rubble. That double-tap alone is a potential war crime under Geneva Convention protections for medical and rescue personnel.
And when you have the Cheeto in chief gloating about attacking the bridge after he said he'll
"bomb Iran to the Stone Age", you're not looking at a "military necessity" argument, but rather the deliberate targeting of civilian infrastructure to terrorize a population into submission which is war crime
18
Thrown_Account_Apr 2, 2026
-16
Most bridges are not solely civilian especially a highway bridge out of the capital with a military base. You know why the US has it's highway system? It is because they wanted a better method to move troops and supplies in case of a war.
-16
KyzzzApr 2, 2026
+9
Going to give you the same response as in the other thread so others can see past your misinformation:
By that logic every road in Tehran is a valid military target because a military base exists somewhere in the city. That’s not how international law works. Proximity doesn’t equal military objective — the bridge has to make an effective contribution to military action and its destruction has to offer a definite military advantage. This bridge wasn’t even operational yet. And even if it were, you still have to satisfy proportionality: 8 dead, 95 wounded, 2,000-lb bombs on a national holiday, double-tap on rescue workers. The Hague tribunal prosecuted the destruction of the Mostar Bridge under exactly this framework.
9
Thrown_Account_Apr 2, 2026
-8
> The Hague tribunal prosecuted the destruction of the Mostar Bridge under exactly this framework.
And found the defendants not guilty as it has military purpose (they still got hit with other crimes).
-8
Skittle69Apr 3, 2026
+5
You could at least try and engage with the comment's other points.
5
IllustriousRange226Apr 2, 2026
-3
When we said be gay do crime, this was not the crimes we had in mind.
17 Comments