· 67 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Mar 28, 2026 at 5:43 AM

Trump ratchets up attacks on NATO, says U.S. no longer needs alliance

Posted by FootballPizzaMan



🚩 Report this post

67 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
greywar777 Mar 28, 2026 +1
NATO is a defensive alliance. Its not there to backup someone who is attacking other countries. Just non stop 24/7 insanity from these folks.
1
TinyKittenWhisper Mar 28, 2026 +1
Why would you need allies for your own war, deal with it men!
1
MrPloppyHead Mar 28, 2026 +1
Except the paedophiles don’t want nato anymore. Everything he does seems to benefit Russia.
1
Euclid_Jr Mar 28, 2026 +1
And they did respond when we asked for an assist after 9/11. Trump understands nothing, and has enough parasites and Russian dupes that will reinforce his ignorance.
1
Catspaw129 Mar 28, 2026 +1
"*NATO is a defensive alliance.*" Oh, poo on you. Everyone knows that the best defense is a good offense. /s
1
Youarethebigbang Mar 28, 2026 +1
trump's entire presidency is a Putin talking point.
1
biasednotshyaboutit Mar 28, 2026 +1
Right?! He is truly putin’s b****.
1
TheQuidditchHaderach Mar 28, 2026 +1
*"C*** Holster"*, says Colbert. 👌😆
1
Big-Rule5269 Mar 28, 2026 +1
Trump is also full of shit about how much money the US has spent for NATO, being nowhere near the trillions his orange makeup slathered ass claims. Also, the US has not put more money towards Ukraine than the EU, with EU countries that have a tiny GDP compared to the US. 
1
barryvm Mar 28, 2026 +1
There's also the thing that NATO countries spend money to buy USA weapons, effectively sponsoring the USA defense industry and jobs as well as bankrolling its designs. Now that Trump has made it clear this was an awful idea, which will now be corrected. Jobs will be lost and that already enormously expensive military will become even more expensive. Another issue is that NATO effectively puts the entirety of Europe either in the USA's camp or at the very least forced them to be neutral (as in this case). Again, Trump has destroyed that now. Europe is rearming as Trump has effectively destroyed faith in the USA honouring the treaty, and with that rearmament will come policy independent of the USA. It might not be coherent, given the various countries involved, but it will immensely complicate whatever the USA thinks or wants to do in the region or in adjacent ones. America first is effectively America alone, and when it is alone all the power accrued through its alliances and its privileged position at the center of global trade and finance will suddenly be very visible, because it will be gone.
1
WulfwoodsSins Mar 28, 2026 +1
Canada, too, has taken a similar rearming stance. Local Colt plant just got big contracts to start pumping out rifles.
1
Paatos Mar 28, 2026 +1
If things go like it has been going, there will be firefights between the US military and (ex) NATO forces. Now, is the US military really up for it? It will likely be boots on the ground instead of just shooting missiles at civilians, and effectively will lead to WW3. It benefits only the BRICS countries at the expense of US lives & livelihood. Is it truly so that the general US citizen doesn't give a f*ck even if it leads to that?
1
areyoualocal Mar 28, 2026 +1
Don't worry, the US' GDP will match soon enough, once the Billionaire flee the sinking ship.
1
TheQuidditchHaderach Mar 28, 2026 +1
He puts that orange shit on his ass, too?! 🤢🤦
1
goldmanstocks Mar 28, 2026 +1
He’s just trying to place the blame of the size of the US military budget and reason they don’t have healthcare on NATO. This is what the Brexit folks did, blame EU for the waste of money, money that could be better spent on the NHS. They’re just leveraging anger on healthcare and pointing it at a shiny object.
1
JeffSteinMusic Mar 28, 2026 +1
Just gonna keep floating the suggestion that everything Donald Trump’s regime and the Republican Party do is with the underlying aim of *whatever will most damage American society and America’s standing in the world*. When you look at everything through that prism, everything makes sense. Have we not spent the past decade watching foreign adversaries have their way with him and by extension his political party?
1
Shenanigans99 Mar 28, 2026 +1
Yep. Recruited willingly or unwillingly, doesn't really matter, by Putin to do all the things to the US and its allies Putin always wanted to do.
1
It_Starts_Smoll Mar 28, 2026 +1
If he *was* a Russian asset, bent on destroying the US, what would he do different?
1
tyme Mar 28, 2026 +1
The end point of everything Trump/this admin does is making the rich richer and making everyone else a serf. To him and his comrades, that is an ideal society, because the rest of us are below them and really should just be happy with the table scraps they occasionally toss our way. We don’t deserve basic human rights, a living wage, etc. etc., because we aren’t part of their “chosen” class. It’s “prosperity gospel” all the way down.
1
sthlmsoul Mar 28, 2026 +1
A few very fundamental things that Trump could never figure out about NATO: * It is not a club with a membership fee. You don't owe other countries money through NATO  * It is a defensive alliance; you can call your allies if attacked, but not if you attack others * Only time that Article 5 of NATO was envoked was by the US post 9/11
1
Peach-Grand Mar 28, 2026 +1
The way the US media has been covering the NATO aspects has been so frustrating. So much misinformation about what/why NATO exists. Of course the US people are going to sour on this important alliance.
1
Prestigious_Chard_90 Mar 28, 2026 +1
Russia is getting great returns on its propaganda rubles because Americans are so stupid and gullible.
1
aleph32 Mar 28, 2026 +1
Asset Krasnov continues to deliver.
1
restore_democracy Mar 28, 2026 +1
This is the guy begging for military assistance, right?
1
Intel-Source Mar 28, 2026 +1
He was, but he got none!
1
Dark_Foggy_Evenings Mar 28, 2026 +1
Good stuff, General Bonespurs. Mount your horse & you n Uncle Sam can show us all how it’s done on your own. Unfortunately the US has no history or experience on which to draw of becoming bogged down in unwinnable wars against invisible enemies from which they eventually flee leaving an inevitable trail of misery & destruction in their unending and ravenous lust for power and territorial ambition…so he’ll just have to wing it. I’m sure it’ll all be just fine and he can lead an armoured column into Tehran personally whilst the Iranians throw roses at his feet.
1
baalsebul Mar 28, 2026 +1
And NATO doesn't need traitorous Trump-U.S.
1
Cheshire_Khajiit Mar 28, 2026 +1
NATO needs the USA, and the USA needs NATO. *Neither* need Trump and his little b**** squad.
1
It_Starts_Smoll Mar 28, 2026 +1
Trump maybe, but NATO *absolutely* needs the US military.
1
No_Confidence7355 Mar 28, 2026 +1
As you wish Lord Putin- DJT
1
compukiller Mar 28, 2026 +1
C’mon, don’t drag Putin into this. The poor guy has been through enough!
1
Intel-Source Mar 28, 2026 +1
He's swimming in money, while Trump is bankrupting us! (and everyone else).
1
compukiller Mar 28, 2026 +1
Yes, I know. It’s sad. But hey, I voted for Kamala. One term with that idiot Trump was more than enough.
1
Watashiwadaredemonai Mar 28, 2026 +1
Can you please just start talking about how Trump is a Russian spy now?
1
PropagandaSucks Mar 28, 2026 +1
Non-American question. Can this dipshit pull out of the alliance just like that or does it need congress etc?
1
KingMario05 Mar 28, 2026 +1
They made it so that it needs Congress.  But who in the current unit will stop him if he tries? Far fewer than you'd hope, I fear.
1
severalsmallducks Mar 28, 2026 +1
After Trump 1 congress made it so that it has to go through it. That said, trump can pull us forces out of nato territories down to a bare naked ass minimum, and effectively go out and say outright that the US won’t honor article 5. That would irreparably fracture the alliance 
1
barryvm Mar 28, 2026 +1
De jure, no. De facto, absolutely. He's the commander in chief of the USA military and his predecessors have long since arrogated Congress' war powers to the presidency. He could just order the military to not honour the NATO treaty when another member is attacked, or he could order the USA military to invade a NATO ally's territory (as he has threatened to do to Canada and Greenland). On top of that, there's also the option for him to do something so heinous or dangerous (e.g. use a nuclear weapon) that public opinion will force governments to withdraw from NATO or, more likely, force a reaction that will in turn cause the USA to withdraw from it. Everything we've seen up to now suggests that the USA Congress will do nothing, the USA's population will do nothing that Trump can't just ignore and the USA military will just follow orders. The USA government are fascists. They don't care about other people within or outside their country. They won't honour treaties, they won't honour alliances and they won't care if they destroy their own country in the pursuit of their own goals. The only thing that stops them is a concern for their own personal power and safety. There are no indications that betraying alliances or starting wars will cause their own people to become angry enough to topple their government, so the conclusion must be that NATO is dead already. So are all the other alliances the USA has. No one can trust Trump, no one can trust the Republican party and no one can trust the people who vote for them. There's no point to openly say so and give the USA the opening to dishonour it immediately, but no one is under any illusions that the USA is still an ally. Even the biggest NATO hawks have turned away from it now. The USA is aligning with our enemies, openly stating it'll help our own fascists to undermine our democracies, and threatening to invade us and our allies.
1
[deleted] Mar 28, 2026 +1
[deleted]
1
It_Starts_Smoll Mar 28, 2026 +1
The 25th amendment has a higher threshold than impeachment. It's really more for a president who is comatose. It's not going to happen.
1
Intel-Source Mar 28, 2026 +1
Trump could not care less about the international stage!
1
Luckydog12 Mar 28, 2026 +1
Just like a russsian asset would say.
1
OneAlexander Mar 28, 2026 +1
The US does need NATO though, because if it pulls out it then risks losing access to basing and military overflight rights of NATO countries and island territories that are vital to the US military supply chain. America's ability to cross the Atlantic, refuel ships, subs and aeroplanes, resupply soldiers, and carry on to the Middle East to defend Israel/Saudi Arabia and attack Iran/other regional nations depends on European ports and bases. Its spy planes and ground based SIGINT operate from European bases, its weapons caches are based there. It's the main way America projects power outside of the Pacific. Yes America has bases in other nations outside NATO, including in Europe (Ireland especially), but the US has courted those nations to gain those bases. Pissing off European NATO probably won't provide the same access.
1
WhatANoob2025 Mar 28, 2026 +1
Oh, trump is doing what everyone with a single brain cell knew he would be doing? The guy's been ranting against NATO since before running for president a first time and he's a notorious coward. Y'all never thought he'd actually stand by NATO commitments, did you? He's just using the lack of support for his offensive war, for which there is no casus foederis in NATO, as his excuse to undermine NATO further. Most pathetic subhuman ever.
1
Onlypizzafans69 Mar 28, 2026 +1
Time for European politicians to grow some f****** spine already, and close US bases. Rammstein and Aviano should be the first one to go, then good luck to americans when evacuating their wounded back to US from middle east.
1
timothywilsonmckenna Mar 28, 2026 +1
Perhaps once president Abe Simpson croaks, America might rediscover it's sense of shame. I won't hold my breath.
1
AdCharacter7966 Mar 28, 2026 +1
Can we please cut ties in NATO with the US, until they have an adult in Office again?
1
ProdoRock Mar 28, 2026 +1
Alright. Let’s see you project power then globally without your European bases. As usual, it’s all talk of bereavement without any view of strategy.
1
ok-painter-1646 Mar 28, 2026 +1
Making this comment because I’m not sure this is yet common knowledge. In 1987 Trump went to Russia for the first time. When he returned to the U.S. two months later he spent $94,801 on full page newspaper ads advocating the U.S. cut back on aiding allies. Suspicious, no? lol. Here’s what it said; To The American People: For decades, Japan and other nations have been taking advantage of the United States. The saga continues unabated as we defend the Persian Gulf, an area of only marginal significance to the United States for its oil supplies, but one upon which Japan and others are almost totally dependent. Why are these nations not paying the United States for the human lives and billions of dollars we are losing to protect their interests? Saudi Arabia, a country whose very existence is in the hands of the United States, last week refused to allow us to use their mine sweepers (which are, sadly, far more advanced than ours) to police the Gulf. The world is laughing at America’s politicians as we protect ships we don’t own, carrying oil we don’t need, destined for allies who won’t help. Over the years, the Japanese, unimpeded by the huge costs of defending themselves (as long as the United States will do it for free), have built a strong and vibrant economy with unprecedented surpluses. They have brilliantly managed to maintain a weak yen against a strong dollar. This, coupled with our monumental spending for their, and others’, defense, has moved Japan to the forefront of world economies. Now that the tides are turning and the yen is becoming strong against the dollar, the Japanese are openly complaining and, in typical fashion, our politicians are reacting to these unjustified complaints. It’s time for us to end our vast deficits by making Japan, and others who can afford it, pay. Our world protection is worth hundreds of billions of dollars to these countries, and their stake in their protection is far greater than ours. Make Japan, Saudi Arabia, and others pay for the protection we extend as allies. Let’s help our farmers, our sick, our homeless by taking from some of the greatest profit machines ever created — machines created and nurtured by us. Tax these wealthy nations, not America. End our huge deficits, reduce our taxes, and let America’s economy grow unencumbered by the cost of defending those who can easily afford to pay us for the defense of their freedom. Let’s not let our great country be laughed at anymore. Sincerely, Donald J. Trump All sorts of references to his current trash politics. U.S. needs a weaker dollar like Japan’s yen so it too can have trade surpluses like Japan. U.S. doesn’t need the gulf oil so all the other nations have to come get involved in his war and police the strait of Hormuz. You’d never hear him advocating for helping the homeless now, hah. Reduce the deficit? If he thought it was huge in 1987 look at it now, loooool 39 trillion and growing fast. Guess what it was in 1987? 150 billion. In today’s dollars that 437 billion. That’s LESS than Trump wants to ADD to the pentagon budget; 500 billion. It would be funny if it wasn’t so stupidly destructive.
1
friendsandmodels Mar 28, 2026 +1
Dont listen to the PDF
1
LinusUllmark Mar 28, 2026 +1
His words have really lost all weight
1
Motorbarge Mar 28, 2026 +1
He's pretty much wrong about everything so my guess is that Russia or China will do something to provoke the Donald. They are already scrambling to replace the 800 or so missiles that they fired into Iran so this is probably the worst time to flip off NATO.
1
Available-Trouble648 Mar 28, 2026 +1
TACO time. I bet when he was talking all that shit about taking Greenland the powers that be told him to knock it the f*** off. Even some in the GOP turned on him when he was about to threaten the existence of NATO. He’s just pouting, if NATO gave him a shiny trophy with his name on it he would announce we are staying.
1
Isosinsir Mar 28, 2026 +1
Just like his boss told him.
1
redalert825 Mar 28, 2026 +1
Then why tf are we in nato?
1
basilic85 Mar 28, 2026 +1
Salut ne venez plus en europe
1
ANTILAMER13 Mar 28, 2026 +1
25th Impeach Keep toilet paper from him
1
saiyanscaris Mar 28, 2026 +1
meaning soon no one will be our allies. just the united states of america and nothing else
1
Intel-Source Mar 28, 2026 +1
Trump said we don't need them!
1
Intel-Source Mar 28, 2026 +1
Trump will not work with them anymore! He will definitely pull out of NATO next.
1
Pumpkins_Are_Fruits Mar 28, 2026 +1
Yep, let’s piss off NATO right before we send Troops to a war that is not a war that we won
1
Artyparis Mar 28, 2026 +1
European here. NATO has no reason to exist anymore. We have supported US after 9/11, we had troops in Afghanistan : fair. Now Washington doesn't care when Russia starts a war in Europe. And consider Europe should be involved in its wars here and there. Who wants a chaotic ally who may drag you in his nonsensical battles he can't solve by himself ? Sad to say it's a new era. Europe has to cut dangerous ties and focus on its own defense.  We didn't ask for this.
1
Intel-Source Mar 28, 2026 +1
Yep! Trump said Ukraine is "not our problem!"
1
barryvm Mar 28, 2026 +1
This is especially egregious because the USA, together with Russia, guaranteed Ukraine's territorial integrity through a treaty in exchange for them giving up their nuclear arsenal. Now both have betrayed that treaty.
1
Intel-Source Mar 28, 2026 +1
Unfortunately, Trump is all about money. He sees Ukraine as a totally unwinnable war, and a complete waste of money. That's why he cut off all US funding for them!
1
barryvm Mar 28, 2026 +1
That's not all of it though. In a democracy, it is the legislature's job to ensure the executive upholds the treaties the legislature has ratified. It is now obvious that the Republican party has no intention to do that. They can not be trusted, and by extension the USA can not be trusted. It's why all the USA's alliances are effectively dead right now, only existing because no one outside the USA has any incentive to openly state that fact. It's also not just that they are greedy though, because that "money" the USA gave Ukraine was actually loans that they then used to buy USA weapons, subsidizing the USA's own industries, to combat one of the USA's main geo-strategic rivals. What this shows is not that the USA is selfish, but that it is either incredibly stupid or actively on the other side. It has become increasingly clear that it is both.
1
Intel-Source Mar 28, 2026 +1
Trump listens to military intel at the Pentagon. Once they told him that Ukraine has zero chance of winning this war, he kicked them to the curb.
1
← Back to Board