· 200 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 23, 2026 at 12:28 PM

Trump reclassifies state-licensed medical marijuana as a less-dangerous drug in a historic shift

Posted by citrus1330


Trump reclassifies state-licensed medical marijuana as a less-dangerous drug in a historic shift
AP News
Trump reclassifies state-licensed medical marijuana as a less-dangerous drug in a historic shift
A cannabis industry group calls President Donald Trump’s reclassification of state-licensed medical marijuana as a less-dangerous drug “the most significant federal advancement in cannabis policy" in decades.

🚩 Report this post

200 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
Sladay Apr 23, 2026 +1017
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-places-fda-approved-marijuana-products-and-products-containing-marijuana Only for those that have medical cannabis licenses. That's what it rescheduled to schedule three this morning. Further review of cannabis is scheduled for an expedited administrative hearing on June 29th. Small step forward but it's interesting to see where this goes.
1017
LordoftheChia Apr 23, 2026 +322
Yup, the relevant part of the article: >shifting licensed **medical marijuana** from Schedule I — reserved for drugs without medical use and with high potential for abuse — to the less strictly regulated Schedule III. It also gives **licensed medical marijuana** operators a major tax break and eases some barriers to researching cannabis.
322
Sladay Apr 23, 2026 +108
https://hightimes.com/news/politics/cannabis-rescheduling-could-happen-today-dont-call-it-legalization/ "It was also unclear Thursday how the order might affect operations in states where licensed recreational shops also serve registered medical patients. In Washington state, 302 of 460 licensed stores have endorsements allowing them to sell tax-free cannabis to registered patients — the implications for those operators remain to be clarified." It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out because I don't think anyone expected state medical cannabis and FDA approved cannabis treatments to be split from the rest of the cannabis review.
108
1800treflowers Apr 23, 2026 +8
I'm waiting to see if this affects Georgia. The medical cannabis bill is on the governors desk to sign into law but it hasn't happened yet. Wondering if this will help push it over the edge which would allow for stronger percentages. My dad's on it so I want to get something that actually works for his back pain.
8
WanderWut Apr 23, 2026 +35
I also read that this could also mean that for medical marijuana patients it would take out the need to test for THC. I mean if that’s true that would still be huge as it’s wild how you can be a legal patient and yet still not have a job due to actually consuming what you are legally prescribed. Of course we want it federally legal in general but this seemingly small step could be major in that regard at the very least.
35
girlinthegoldenboots Apr 23, 2026 +17
Some doctors won’t prescribe adhd meds if you are also a medical mj patient. Interesting to see how that shakes out there as well.
17
hashtagmoneyswag Apr 23, 2026 +8
There are already states that do this like NJ and NY - both illegal to discriminate based on appearance of THC in a drug test
8
trixilly Apr 23, 2026 +10
ah but say you work for a railroad and the FRA deems you as "safety sensitive" - a positive drug test will still remove you from your job even if its from CBD that's perfectly legal and non-intoxicating. Part of the problem with the test is that it tests for a metabolite & not for current intoxication. I would like sober operators & folks who are able to use their medical drugs in safe way & I don't know how we do that with current testing practices. The federal government loves to enforce its random drug testing practices.
10
hashtagmoneyswag Apr 24, 2026 +7
Actually extremely fair point. I actually completely forgot federal jobs aren’t subject to state law! Yeah I absolutely agree with you though - that should not be the case especially when it’s prescribed
7
Pinklady777 Apr 23, 2026 +77
Will this mean that if you have a prescription for it, it won't count against you on a drug test?
77
ScrofessorLongHair Apr 23, 2026 +101
Exactly why I'm in this thread. You would assume so. But I haven't seen it explicitly stated. F*** everything else, this is absolutely f****** critical, imo.
101
Danger_McNasty Apr 23, 2026 +65
That’s still directly up to your employer. I assume more specifically it’s up to the discretion of the insurance company they use. My current employer allows the use (not during work, of course) as long as your medical license is up to date.
65
ModusNex Apr 23, 2026 +23
It's going to be up to if it's a safety hazard like if you operate heavy machinery. It being a doctors prescription changes the rules somewhat.
23
The_0ven Apr 23, 2026 +17
> Will this mean that if you have a prescription for it, it won't count against you on a drug test? The employer decides what counts against you
17
Sladay Apr 23, 2026 +11
True but off clock use will be the interesting factor, especially in states that protect off-clock use.. I saw some speculation that it could be an ADA issue that could open litigation on employers if you have a medical card and they deny outright without examining a potential "reasonable accommodation."
11
Justkeepbreathing123 Apr 23, 2026 +5
It varies greatly based on where you live. There are no US federal protections against discrimination, including by employers, based on marijuana use, but there are some states and localities that have enacted protections
5
hali420 Apr 23, 2026 +14
This is how it started in Canada my friend. You are on your way.
14
AnonymousInMI Apr 23, 2026 +4178
So still illegal on the federal level? Dumb. Should have been legalized decades ago.
4178
nosungdeeptongs Apr 23, 2026 +1441
It’s a policy you keep in your back pocket in case you make a major political f*** up like going to war with Iran.
1441
PsyOpBunnyHop Apr 23, 2026 +518
*And then they came for the potheads* *But I did nothing, because I got high*
518
spaceykc Apr 23, 2026 +34
Randy Walters is a son of a b****
34
Musiclover4200 Apr 23, 2026 +12
That's why I fucked his wife and got filthy rich
12
LeaveThatCatAlone Apr 23, 2026 +156
Just don't steal my lemon pound cake. 
156
bballkj7 Apr 23, 2026 +50
afroman is on his “Freedom of Speech” tour right now!! Lemon pound cake will be served at the set!!!!! Ask me how I know? I’m going, b****!!!
50
Soft-Detective-1514 Apr 23, 2026 +55
Not Mama’s lemon pound cake!
55
OrbitalColony Apr 23, 2026 +5
🎵 Afroman will bring it to ya Afroman is gonna do ya Afroman is gonna screw ya My proof’s on the internet 🎵 https://youtu.be/HM8Ee6pcXvQ?si=9iB093AyFRaURUjd
5
orcusgrasshopperfog Apr 23, 2026 +16
Momma's pound cake? But it tastes so good
16
Popular-Rule Apr 23, 2026 +5
And don't touch the lemon cherry gelato too
5
ThatGuyWithCoolHair Apr 23, 2026 +15
*Da dada duhdaduh*
15
mattchewy43 Apr 23, 2026 +7
I was gonna call my congressman, but then I got high.
7
TheThebanProphet Apr 23, 2026 +11
And then ICE raided my house because I got high~
11
UOLZEPHYR Apr 23, 2026 +102
This one. Its political point to use BECAUSE Trump is a popularist, he says things people like, Reclassify Marijuana No tax on tips Lower energy Lower gas And all the other bullshit hes spouted off. Ironically HIS republican held house and senate could very easily pass theough lege basically nailing all this shit done and closed - capping costs of stuff like insulin, cancer drugs, ending tax on tips and over time, capping costs on energy and gas ... f****** having Congress amend Controlled Substance Act and rescheduling Mary as Class 3 OR better - just declassified it in its entirely and letter the states decide (which is think he said originally was his end goal) - But, this guy is a liar and pedofile, hes bought and paid by AIPAC and Bibi, a traitor to the union. Release the Trump-Epstein Pedo Files
102
nosungdeeptongs Apr 23, 2026 +14
release the epstein files.  do not release the pedo files please.
14
microwavepetcarrier Apr 23, 2026 +14
Release the Pedo Files, lock up all the pedophiles.
14
devi83 Apr 23, 2026 +18
> going to war with Iran. Which was a policy you keep in your back pocket in case you make a major f*** up like going to Epsteins island.
18
Sit_Ubu_Sit-Good_Dog Apr 23, 2026 +90
It’s so dumb. This only applies to medical. Recreational is still schedule I. The same plant could be scheduled differently depending on where it’s sold. >Marijuana or marijuana-derived products that are **not distributed through a state medical marijuana** program will continue to be classified in Schedule I.
90
cocktail_wiitch Apr 23, 2026 +594
I fully believe the prohibition of cannabis has everything to do with hemp and the impact it would have on major industries (oil, textiles, pharmaceuticals), and less about THC. They used to reefer madness propaganda to get people on board. I agree this should've been done a long time ago.
594
Massive-Rate-2011 Apr 23, 2026 +533
We’ve been able to farm hemp for a while. Hemp isn’t banned. 
533
Halgy Apr 23, 2026 +111
Yep. Hemp is legal to the extent that CBD extracted from hemp (and the derivatives synthesized from it) are legal in my state, even though normal weed isn't.
111
sketchtireconsumer Apr 23, 2026 +114
> Yep. Hemp is legal to the extent that CBD extracted from hemp (and the derivatives synthesized from it) are legal in my state This ends this year
114
robodrew Apr 23, 2026 +41
Good job dumbass legislators, now the extraction will have to be done using low THC cannabis, and it will be a lot more labor intensive to make medications that have extremely low to no THC.
41
darkkilla123 Apr 23, 2026 +63
moscow mitch snuck that in there because americans are not getting drunk enough and the alcohol buisness is struggling due to the rest of the worlds self emposed boycott of red state products
63
bo_dingles Apr 23, 2026 +19
>moscow mitch Wasn't just moscow mitch, the ruling class decided we don't need it under the cover of a "think of the children" bullshit move. Remember "the AGs sent a letter asking congress to fix that loophole", was 39 states, not just one side of the aisle: Alabama, Hawaii, Maryland, North Dakota, Arizona, Illinois, Massachusetts, Ohio, Arkansas, Indiana, Minnesota, Oklahoma, California, Iowa, Mississippi, Pennsylvania, Colorado, Kansas, Missouri, Puerto Rico, Connecticut, Louisiana, Nebraska, Rhode Island, Delaware, Maine, Nevada, South Carolina, Georgia, New Hampshire, New Mexico, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, U.S. Virgin Islands, New York, North Carolina, Wyoming Certainly some of this is to prop up that alcohol industry as genz is definitely not drinking at a rate of previous generations, but there's plenty more industries that benefit so here we are.
19
Halgy Apr 23, 2026 +14
I've been thinking that I should visit my friend in Missouri more often, anyway
14
clay_perview Apr 23, 2026 +249
You are forgetting the big player the alcohol industry, legal cannabis is crippling them.
249
pyronius Apr 23, 2026 +56
Yep. A while back, shortly after Louisiana saw a proliferation of legal, hemp-derived thc drinks, the state legislature started pushing to ban them. There was a huge backlash, but they kept pushing it forward. A little digging revealed that basically all the pressure for the ban was coming from a single local alcohol industry bigwig who also happened to be one of the Republican party's largest donors. Literally nobody *except* the alcohol industry wanted it banned. Even Republican politicians eventually had to cave and only impose restrictions on where it could be sold, because their own voters would have driven them out of town. The "compromise" was to ban it in bars *except* for the bars that were already selling it, which was basically all of them. So, basically any new bars (and there's a lot of churn in New Orleans, which is the largest market) would be forbidden from selling it.
56
VelvetElvis Apr 23, 2026 +29
The private prison industry.
29
Dzugavili Apr 23, 2026 +115
I mean, this is really it. Any competing intoxicant is a killer for casual drinking, and pot really fills in that niche.
115
HippyDM Apr 23, 2026 +101
It really did for me. Drank way too much in the Marines, got out and found weed, never looked back. Now beers will sit in my fridge for weeks.
101
Taint__Paint Apr 23, 2026 +54
Good for you, man! Same here. Switched from booze to bud and it’s made a world of difference in my life. Saved my marriage too. There is no reason for liquor to be legal and weed to still be seen as a horrible drug.
54
DannyPowers98 Apr 23, 2026 +14
Same same. Never really had a problem with over drinking, but realized that it never really made me feel good. Switched to edibles instead. Much cheaper, lost some weight, and feel more mentally clear.
14
Ok_Astronomer_8667 Apr 23, 2026 +6
Edibles are much healthier and won’t give you a hangover. Easy choice for me.
6
hyprmatt Apr 23, 2026 +14
This is exactly what I plan to do when I get out. I really think we'd have less weight issues in the military if we could smoke a joint instead of knock back a 6 pack on a Tuesday night.
14
espressocycle Apr 23, 2026 +8
It's not a killer for casual drinking. It's that the big players in the industry rely on alcoholics.
8
ApprehensiveYak3287 Apr 23, 2026 +13
Alcohol is terrible and deserves to be taken down by cannabis in my opinion!
13
insanitazer Apr 23, 2026 +9
Apparently, enough of Trump's friends got into the cannabis business on an industrial level for him to loosen the laws and start making money there
9
ElGrapeApe Apr 23, 2026 +101
https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/RS22131 The farm bill gave broad legalization to hemp.
101
Eggmegmuffin Apr 23, 2026 +106
And the bug beautiful bill closed that loophole
106
Mature_BOSTN Apr 23, 2026 +51
Belief is a wonderful thing . . . but facts?? There's no way that hemp would disrupt "oil, textiles, pharmaceuticals" in any meaningful way. Im not sure where this 'religion' around hemp comes from, but the maths don't math. There is nothing SO UNIQUE about hemp that if fully legal it would disrupt any of those industries when no other plant has come close.
51
BPD_trash_panda Apr 23, 2026 +9
It's got more to do with the fact that it's very hard to make money off of it pharmaceutically (or at all really) if it's legal. It's not called "Weed" for no reason, pretty much anyone can grow it. If it were 100% legal, well theres not much of an industry because a few folks can do homegrows of enough weed to supply an entire neighborhood really. Greenhouses and grow operations have high over head and would never be able to compete with people just growing it on their own in their garden or as a hobby. So they'd prefer to keep it somewhat illegal so that they can make money off of it.
9
Mature_BOSTN Apr 23, 2026 +11
I can understand that the cannabis grow and retail industry wants to keep it regulated. But "big oil" and "big pharma" and "big fiber" . . . I call BS on those having vested interests. And given the popularity of edibles and various formats . . . I'm not so sure that homegrown dried leaves products would run dispensaries out of business. But I'm not a user so what do I know?
11
Guardian_of_theBlind Apr 23, 2026 +9
It's actually mostly about alcohol. Alcohol consumption went down considerably in the states and countries that legalized. The same effect can be currently seen in Germany and this is also the reason why our conservative parties were so against it. And weed is way more healthy (Not smoking weed, smoking weed is ridiculously unhealthy) and way less dangerous than alcohol.
9
TheDrAlbrhect Apr 23, 2026 +29
That was one thing, the other thing was straight up racism. Dark-skinned minorities depicted as alcoholics or druggies has been a thing since...basically when the US became independent.
29
Aggravating-Salad441 Apr 23, 2026 +22
This is the actual, historical answer. Marijuana was associated with racist tropes about Mexican immigrants.
22
virtualjupiter Apr 23, 2026 +11
This is the correct answer. Racism is the primary excuse for cannabis prohibition. 
11
keylimedragon Apr 23, 2026 +9
Historically it was more about anti-black and anti-latino racism at first, or at least using it that way. Nixon was also directly responsible even though he admitted that it was "not particularly dangerous". It was useful for him to target anti-war hippie protestors plus black and Latino people. I believe the tobacco and alcohol industry might have had something to do with it later, but they didn't even know to lobby about it back when it was first made and kept at schedule I. It's also possible that old conservatives had it drilled into their brains for years and years that drugs including weed are bad, or they think their constituents really don't want legalization. Old habits die hard.
9
sirbassist83 Apr 23, 2026 +26
close-ish, its still banned because of the alcohol and tobacco lobbies.
26
Dzugavili Apr 23, 2026 +13
I don't think tobacco lobbies against it: marijuana does not compete against tobacco. There's been signs that a lot of the tobacco companies have been looking at getting into the market; just the material scales are very different, because very few people could smoke a pack of joints every day. But tobacco seems to be on its way out, so they might not have much of a choice about adapting.
13
Round-Butterscotch48 Apr 23, 2026 +17
Tobacco wants it legal. Not only is Big tobacco is a fan of anything that helps normalize smoking plant material. What other industry has more experience cultivating, harvesting and packaging a plant to be smoked ? As people continue to smoke less and less cigarettes. Legal marijuana is the perfect use of existing production and distribution infrastructure. Legal marijuana is the future of big tobacco.
17
Independent-Name4478 Apr 23, 2026 +1557
I want full federal legalization, it’s just stupid it hasn’t happened.
1557
Corgiboom2 Apr 23, 2026 +392
But that would ruin a campaign talking point.
392
threemo Apr 23, 2026 +61
What campaign talking point?
61
Zilithahz Apr 23, 2026 +135
Ironically it being in this weird limbo schedule 3 area is beneficial to both sides when it comes to campaigning. The democrats can say "we will fully legalize it federally" and Republicans can say "we will bring it back to schedule 1" but I am guessing that neither of them will do anything because they will lose a point to yap about.
135
TwoPoundzaSausage Apr 23, 2026 +41
It's funny, because that's the cause of all of this political division in this country: Politicians maintaining wedge issues to ensure job security.
41
AwarenessOk2359 Apr 23, 2026 +14
Do any Republicans ever say that?
14
CranberryLast4683 Apr 23, 2026 +6
It seems the parties are divided on the age old question of how to tax it rather than whether or not it should be allowed.
6
insidli Apr 23, 2026 +2085
Cool what about federal employee medical use?? Edit: omg 17 years on Listnook and I’ve never gotten this many upvotes!
2085
Justifiably_Bad_Take Apr 23, 2026 +1375
Both the FBI and CIA are perpetually low on white-hat hackers because- 1. Private sector pays magnitudes better 2. They literally cannot find people with a professional background in hacking who haven't smoked weed in the last 2 years
1375
Live-Pea4081 Apr 23, 2026 +635
Its 3 years. I was 3 years clean and then this admin came about and it was not a govt I wanted to work for so I started back again 
635
Water_offaduck_13 Apr 23, 2026 +135
That's a great point People who were on the fence because of those things could very likely easily flip to be who they want and not work for a shitty administration.
135
Journalist_Radiant Apr 23, 2026 +4
This is what happened to me. I’m not a hacker, but I got out of the military to go to school with plans to go back in and commission. That plan is now out the window because there’s no way I’m gambling being in during an insane and stupid administration.
4
crowwreak Apr 23, 2026 +39
I'm just picturing this as a recruiter showing up to your door and you answering lighting up with one hand and flipping him off with the other
39
LethalBacon Apr 23, 2026 +186
YEP, I backed out from an interview process for a Software role recently because of this. Even CBD use didn't fly. So f****** stupid.
186
ButterH2 Apr 23, 2026 +113
f****** CBD??? what next, ibuprofen use?
113
jdm219 Apr 23, 2026 +75
Ironically the government absolutely pumps that stuff to soldiers in lieu of medical treatment. Probably so many destroyed livers from it.
75
N3rdr4g3 Apr 23, 2026 +77
Ibuprofen (advil) causes stomach ulcers with overuse, but doesn't damage your liver. Acetaminophen (Tylenol) causes liver damage with overuse.
77
Vanviator Apr 23, 2026 +5
TMC = Tylenol Motrin Codine, lol *It's actually Troop Medical Clinic, but your 99% gonna leave with one of the above.
5
dj92wa Apr 23, 2026 +5
800mg Motrin in a giant white bottle. Take a knee, drink water. “Beat the heat, drill sar’, beat the heat!”
5
DogAnusJesus Apr 23, 2026 +9
Tbf, I've been a soldier. Ibuprofen is but a small part of the liver destroying equation.
9
Sethmeisterg Apr 23, 2026 +5
Yea but being a raging alcoholic is just fine.
5
Dull_Job_6372 Apr 23, 2026 +6
My dad worked in IT his whole career as a dba and never got tested. Meanwhile he smoked like a chimney since he was 14 lol. How times change.
6
bronsonrider Apr 23, 2026 +8
Friend of mine was the IT guy for a big company near me that was taken over by a US firm who bought in drug testing. My mate explained to them that he’d been smoking for 40 years, 20 of them at this firm, and nobody had ever bought it up before. The new manager gave him some c*** speech and my mate said fair enough and quit on the spot. This caused massive problems for them and 2 days later he’s back at work and they forgot about the testing. They tried to get him to teach someone else to do the job but he’s not that stupid. Worked there and smoked every day till he retired.
8
BPD_trash_panda Apr 23, 2026 +92
Yup. And then they end up contracting out to companies where the folks there all hold the same clearances but never get tested so they all smoke weed. I'm very familiar with the industry and it's hilarious quite frankly. The FBI and CIA pay poorly and won't hire people who have smoked weed. They then end up spending MORE money than they would have just hiring and paying some pot head hacker to have a govt contract with a private company staffed by a bunch of people who smoke weed. It makes no sense at all.
92
Issah_Wywin Apr 23, 2026 +8
Crazy that they don't have the same standards on alcohol drinking. "Oh, you drank beer 3 nights ago? You're fired"
8
Gronkattack Apr 23, 2026 +109
I mean the director of the FBI does coke so does it really matter?
109
Wittyname0 Apr 23, 2026 +48
It's always ok when the guys on top do it. We're talking about us peons
48
inspectoroverthemine Apr 23, 2026 +16
Coke has _always_ been ok if you are in the right circles.
16
Hairy_Mycologist_945 Apr 23, 2026 +23
Doubtful. They can be functional alcoholics but if they touch CBD they're suddenly engaged in moral turpitude or some bullshit.
23
Mastershroom Apr 23, 2026 +7
Your alcoholism doesn't even have to be functional if you're the Secretary of Defense.
7
kylewhatever Apr 23, 2026 +13
This is completely anecdotal but my gf switched jobs as a federal employee. She got drug tested, failed. They still let her keep her job and just had her re test a month later which she passed and has abstained since.
13
FiestyShibas Apr 23, 2026 +5
If he changes it to legal use for federal employees…. And the age change on military sign up. We might be looking at something bigger fellas. Piece it together.
5
jakelazerz Apr 23, 2026 +602
Nobody from the Epstein files has been prosecuted.
602
40to6inthe4th Apr 23, 2026 +164
The current AG literally said they will "not prosecute any predators from the Epstein files". The admit they know there are predators and outright say they wont prosecute them. Its going to take social revolt to get any changes done that we want to see at this point. The government at almost every level has proven they dont give a flying f*** about what the citizens want or need.
164
jakelazerz Apr 23, 2026 +19
It sets a dangerous precedent: We do not hold our elected officials to a higher standard and they can blatantly commit heinous crimes with no repercussions. Waiting out the clock is not going to fix anything, as the worst humans in the world (moreso than now) will continue to gravitate towards elected positions.
19
seeingeyegod Apr 23, 2026 +15
The Dow, The Dow
15
QuestshunQueen Apr 23, 2026 +1657
Didn't Biden start the ball rolling in 2021? https://www.npr.org/2024/05/01/1248403456/the-biden-administration-advances-its-aim-to-reclassify-marijuana
1657
Sabertooth767 Apr 23, 2026 +741
He did, yes, but it seems either of them could always have just done this, since the order simply goes around the review process.
741
SomeDEGuy Apr 23, 2026 +280
I honestly don't know if it is legal for him to go around the review process, but it would not surprise me to find out that he did something illegal. At least this one is positive.
280
Sabertooth767 Apr 23, 2026 +87
The legal justification is that federal law allows the attorney general to determine the appropriate classification for drugs that the U.S. must regulate pursuant to an international treaty. Will that reasoning hold up in court? I imagine we will see.
87
graveybrains Apr 23, 2026 +46
The law also requires the attorney general consult with the secretary of health and human services, evaluate the decision according to a list of criteria provided by congress, and the whole thing is subject to the regular rule making procedures (it also doesn't apply to anything explicitly scheduled by an act of congress, but that doesn't apply to marijuana). If they skipped all those steps I expect it'll get laughed out of court. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title21-section811&num=0&edition=prelim
46
espressocycle Apr 23, 2026 +11
SCOTUS has already invalidated multiple laws binding the executive branch, so what's one more?
11
HYDROMORPHONE_ZONE Apr 23, 2026 +47
Yeah legally we can’t even change the scheduling according to the different international treaties we are part of and created. Will that stop us? Probably not. Will other countries legalize? Maybe.
47
SkiingAway Apr 23, 2026 +36
Canada has legalized federally without issue.
36
thecashblaster Apr 23, 2026 +6
and Germany
6
cwaterbottom Apr 23, 2026 +6
Now that's interesting and new to me, do you have a name of a treaty or something I can look up when I get some time?
6
Binary-Trees Apr 23, 2026 +3
I think they are referring to the Single Convention of Narcotic Drugs.
3
ReserveFormal3910 Apr 23, 2026 +19
The difference is if a democrat tried this Republicans would be up in arms decrying federal overreach, but...
19
SLUnatic85 Apr 23, 2026 +11
trump has avoided the review process his entire presidency(s).
11
atreeismissing Apr 23, 2026 +12
This order doesn't go around the review process because the review process was completed under Biden. There are 2 ways to reschedule marijuana: 1. Congress passes a law 2. The President orders a review by HHS and DOJ and upon their review then writes and Executive Order rescheduling it (though to be fair, before the EO happens the President is supposed to work with Congress to update any laws that may be impacted by the EO which essentially moves it all back to option #1). Biden did the review process but hadn't written an EO, Trump wrote this EO without working with Congress, which means nothing will change other than possibly how the DOJ interprets state medical marijuana licenses, something the federal govt had already not been bothering to enforce at the federal level. AP News calling it an historic shift is just more white washing of Trump's faux-accomplishments.
12
EquipmentMaterial540 Apr 23, 2026 +12
if Biden had done it, Republicans would have fought him tooth and nail. Trump can do it because Democrats also support it, there's no one who wants to fight over it.
12
frosty_lizard Apr 23, 2026 +41
I assume he and his admin think that relaxing weed laws will save him with voters 😂 I'm sure his approval ratings have nothing to do with trade wars, ICE terrorizing the country, almost starting WW3 by threating to annihilate after attacking them and Lebanon (BC why not attack another country while your at it)
41
fer_sure Apr 23, 2026 +37
>think that relaxing weed laws will save him with voters As they say, a libertarian is a conservative who smokes pot. This could maybe get a few young men to come out to vote rather than stay home for the midterms.
37
rrdubbs Apr 23, 2026 +12
That’s gotta be the intent here. Caesar’s games in the Colosseum to distract from failures.
12
m1sterlurk Apr 23, 2026 +8
"State-licensed medical" being deemed "legal" while "unlicensed" weed is still Schedule I, meaning that our law enforcement has deemed it a substance with no medical usefulness. Destroying our entire drug law infrastructure needs to happen very badly.
8
Fadedcamo Apr 23, 2026 +10
It definitely doesn't hurt. I mean keeping weed illegal at this point is benefiting who? Some law enforcement and prison lobbys? Everyone sees where the wind has been blowing on legalization of this drug for a decade or more. There's plenty of low information voters out there who will hear all this random shit about how bad Trump is and this and that about corruption and shrug and think "both sides". Except trump legalized it. So good enough for them.
10
projexion_reflexion Apr 23, 2026 +16
Schrodinger's court would've stopped Biden in his tracks. 
16
asque2000 Apr 23, 2026 +36
Biden got the ball rolling on reclassification, and trump put a stop to it, and then did the same thing in order to take credit for it.
36
naththegrath10 Apr 23, 2026 +103
Yes, and it’s actually a microcosm of the failure of the Biden administration. They started the slow roll process of things getting better but didn’t want to actually rock the boat so it just kicked the can down the road a bit. Eventually leaving the door open for someone else to take credit
103
SvenTropics Apr 23, 2026 +117
I still think it's crazy that every single time a ballot initiative has come up to legalize recreational marijuana since 2008, it has had over 50% of the votes. This means, just among voting people, more than half of them want it to be completely legal for recreational adult use. Not even a prescription medication. In one of those cases, it didn't pass because the state requires 60%, but it got within a few percent of that. Then you look at the politicians, and they're like "well I guess we can make it from the most serious possible dangerous category to the less serious but still totally dangerous category."
117
AgnewsHeadlessClone Apr 23, 2026 +46
Florida checking in. Yeah, we needed 60% due to a prior ballot measure. The previous ballot measure made it so all future ballot measures would need 60% to pass. If I recall, the 60% amendment passed with much less than 60%
46
BrainCane Apr 23, 2026 +13
And they stopped counting at 57%..
13
justlikethatmeh Apr 23, 2026 +650
Only trying so soften the republican party's image for the mid terms.
650
Going_Native Apr 23, 2026 +388
Ohio voted to legalize recreational use and now the republican controlled statehouse is rolling parts of it back. So much for popular opinion.
388
ToiletPunisher19 Apr 23, 2026 +130
If it makes the people of Ohio feel any better South Dakota straight up said no to the ballot initiative to legalize it
130
karny90 Apr 23, 2026 +108
Tennessee won’t even allow us to vote on it because it would pass. Instead they passed a law that would still make it illegal even if it’s legal federally.
108
fevered_visions Apr 23, 2026 +34
"party of freedom"
34
karny90 Apr 23, 2026 +19
Tennessee is blasted with propaganda constantly to the point a vast majority believe Democrats are a detriment to society even though we haven’t had a democratic governor since ‘11. It’s been straight up Republicans across the board, in every position since then. But somehow it’s not their fault, it’s the democrats. (We’ve had a massive influx of non-resident conservatives over the years who move here for the no state income tax and have completely taken over every aspect of the government to set up their own personal “safe space”)
19
Specialist-Bee-9406 Apr 23, 2026 +11
So do we Canadians need to smoke more weed and exhale it over the border?  We can piggyback it on the forest fire smoke. 
11
-SHAI_HULUD Apr 23, 2026 +25
Kristy Noem got tired of terrorizing South Dakota so she decided to terrorize the entire country. What a c***.
25
Geno0wl Apr 23, 2026 +10
Didn't they do some fuckery with that? Like they saw a ballot initiative and passed their own weed legalization law that canceled the ballot initiative, but then after the submission deadline repealed the law they just passed.
10
End3rWi99in Apr 23, 2026 +4
I really don't get it. They can look to dozens of other states that have fully legalized and have absolutely no problems from it, and a shit load of new tax income. Who even are the lobbying groups against it at this point?
4
sixcharlie Apr 23, 2026 +18
South Dakota voted for full legalization back in 2019. Kristi Noem decided the voters didn't understand the referendum so it's still not legal.
18
Halgy Apr 23, 2026 +6
South Dakota voted to legalize recreational use several years ago, and Noem flat out ignored it. Nebraska legalized medical use two years ago, and the GOP governor/legislature is doing everything in their power to avoid actually implementing it.
6
interprime Apr 23, 2026 +5
Same thing happened in VA. The public voted on legalization, it passed, and then Youngkin basically went “Nuh uh” and blocked any attempts to allow recreational dispensaries to open.
5
Scaryclouds Apr 23, 2026 +9
Feels familiar as a Missourian… the Missouri state house loves to constantly undermine ballot measures when it enacts something an inch to the left on Ronald Reagan.  Yet people continue to vote in Republicans 🙄
9
nloxxx Apr 23, 2026 +8
I just quit smoking weed and this new law still pisses me off so much as an Ohioan. One of the reps said something along the lines of, “Voters knew we could come along and make changes at any time, we’re still following what the voters want,” while stripping out parts that the voters wanted.
8
Shadow293 Apr 23, 2026 +16
Not going to work.
16
jcooli09 Apr 23, 2026 +417
Release the Epstein files.
417
[deleted] Apr 23, 2026 +8
[removed]
8
OGLikeablefellow Apr 23, 2026 +31
Yeah wtf
31
SurferRay Apr 23, 2026 +17
I think this has more to do with the upcoming ruling in U.S. vs Hemani than anything. Sounds like SCOTUS is going to rule in favor of 2A so that people can smoke weed and have guns. Big win for surface level Libertarians.
17
Vreas Apr 23, 2026 +68
Doesn’t mean shit when it’s still restricted. Ohio legalized a few years ago and somehow we now have MORE restrictions on what weed we can smoke or consume and where we can get it from.. it’s a f****** felony to even possess weed from another state or have it outside of its original packaging. They’ve consistently cut back grow allowances from weight to plants you’re allowed to have.. Politicians only care about making their investor friends rich.
68
Easih Apr 23, 2026 +12
wow thats crazy.
12
Vreas Apr 23, 2026 +24
Yeah man we had an awesome like 3 month window where restaurants and bars were serving thc edible drinks as long as you didn’t buy alcohol at the same time. You could buy disposable vapes, prerolls, knock off thca flower, etc at corner stores. Then they restricted everything down to only being able to buy from extremely overpriced dispensaries. Like I get regulated it to an extent but seems ridiculous. A judge just barred them from enforcing the corner store ban. It’s sad there’s so many empty shelves in beer carry outs and corner stores where they used to have all their products and were making a killing.
24
nloxxx Apr 23, 2026 +12
Gutted a whole job market with that, from what I’ve read. It’s alright though, those jobs are being replaced with *checks notes* a contract with Anduril Industries to build defense systems in Columbus.
12
bobandshawn Apr 23, 2026 +14
"It also gives licensed medical marijuana operators a major tax break and eases some barriers to researching cannabis."...so prices will be coming down...right?
14
AudibleNod Apr 23, 2026 +166
He couldn't have done this earlier in the week? I swear, he has no sense of timing.
166
liesliesfromtinyeyes Apr 23, 2026 +56
I bet he bet on it not to be on 4/20 on Polymarket
56
MentalSky_ Apr 23, 2026 +101
Reclassification is not decriminalization though.  You can still get arrested and charged. Just perhaps not be sentence to life in jail Whereas in Canada nothing happens to you
101
694meok Apr 23, 2026 +30
I can see the cam footage already. Dude in MAGA hat smoking weed while driving, cops pull him over, he yells "But Trump made it legal!!"
30
Squat_Cobbler89 Apr 23, 2026 +29
“Oh I’m sorry I thought this was America!”
29
geodebug Apr 23, 2026 +27
Still going to recriminalize hemp-derived THC in November so this is mostly meaningless.
27
perditaman Apr 23, 2026 +8
Wake me up when i can smoke on Saturday morning and not get fired from a random on Monday
8
DannyStress Apr 23, 2026 +6
See the democrats could have legalized it federally and had a massive amount of support thanks to new revenue streams through taxes. But no, they let Trump do this so he can tout it during the midterms and try to get votes
6
PraxicalExperience Apr 24, 2026 +6
While this sounds like something good, it's not. This will just allow pharmaceutical companies to get a stranglehold on the weed market. It also provides reasoning behind banning home grows: well, we don't let people make any *other* scheduled medicine at home, do we? It should not be scheduled at all.
6
HereToCalmYouDown Apr 23, 2026 +55
Sorry Trump... I love weed but I still hate you and the Republican party.
55
ProfessionalCraft983 Apr 23, 2026 +11
Couldn’t have said it better myself.
11
CivilAgent3443 Apr 23, 2026 +6
So f****** stupid, shit should’ve been legalized on a federal level decades ago.
6
PerpetuallyStartled Apr 23, 2026 +6
Democrats had the opportunity to take this win for years and years.
6
padbodh Apr 23, 2026 +65
Oh his internal approval polling must be low low
65
Psianth Apr 23, 2026 +16
Nah, he just has buddies in the industry who pay him well. Remember the cbd thing?
16
padbodh Apr 23, 2026 +21
I’m not astute but I have been paying attention for ~25 years and presidents only pull the weed lever when things are at their worst
21
ChesterComics Apr 23, 2026 +7
My prediction is right before midterms he'll sign some executive order to legalize it in an attempt to garner votes (don't forget the insider trading part as well) knowing full well that SCOTUS will just shoot it down.
7
ellus1onist Apr 23, 2026 +4
Living in Michigan I genuinely forget sometimes that weed is still widely illegal in this country. There are literally like 7 dispensaries within a 15 minute drive of me
4
InFin0819 Apr 23, 2026 +4
This is just a good policy change. Not going to let my opinion of him otherwise cloud that.
4
Kind-Philosopher5077 Apr 23, 2026 +5
That pedophile isn't doing anything other than distracting from his failures
5
PlayedUOonBaja Apr 23, 2026 +4
**Key Details on the Marijuana Review:** Initial Action (2022): President Biden called for a administrative review of how marijuana is scheduled under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) and issued pardons for federal simple possession offenses. HHS Recommendation (2023): The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) recommended that the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) reclassify marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III. Proposed Rule (2024): The Biden administration formally proposed reclassifying marijuana to Schedule III, recognizing its medical use, but this is not full legalization or decriminalization. Current Status & Next Steps (2026) President Donald Trump’s acting attorney general on Thursday signed an order reclassifying state-licensed medical marijuana as a less-dangerous drug. [-source](https://lamag.com/news-and-politics/biden-administration-moves-to-reclassify-cannabis-report/#:~:text=It%20is%20currently%20classified%20as,share%20the%20love!)
4
recjus85 Apr 23, 2026 +19
Great, he's still a piece of shit.
19
yolo_speedwagon Apr 23, 2026 +19
Great! Still voting Democrat!
19
SeaworthinessSalt119 Apr 23, 2026 +4
This ain’t shit. Tell me when it’s no longer classified.
4
Benromaniac Apr 23, 2026 +4
Should be at least on the same level as cigarettes and alcohol.
4
ZenRage Apr 23, 2026 +5
Of course it is still illegal. Prisons and policing are major industries in the US with a huge lobby. Being able to say, "I smell pot" is a very effective and time tested way for police to circumvent your 4th amendment rights which are otherwise a bar to a stop, a detention, a frisk, a search, an arrest, etc. that they want to push more people into the legal and prison system. This is all about money.
5
Aethermancer Apr 23, 2026 +4
It's all bullshit until they let federal employees use it. That's the real indicator of an actual policy change.
4
Grand_Fruit_9039 Apr 24, 2026 +5
I really don't understand why people are happy about this. it's still federally illegal. this is literally nothing. grow up people. realize this is a nothing burger
5
minervascats Apr 23, 2026 +25
They know legalization will kill their market 💀
25
SuperTopperHarley Apr 23, 2026 +22
No. They just have to have a system in place to profit from the gold rush coming with legalization.
22
minervascats Apr 23, 2026 +8
This is what I'm saying... If they just randomly legalize across the board then they can't profit by keeping it "prescription only" or whatever other restrictions they have the power to enforce 
8
Adopteddaughtermargo Apr 23, 2026 +18
Cool now release the Epstein files
18
L_Cranston_Shadow Apr 23, 2026 +7
Unless I missed it, one thing the article doesn't mention, but is incredibly important, is that this also opens up banking to marijuana companies. Previously, all federally banking facilities, i.e. all banks, couldn't do business with them for fear of prosecution. This also should limit, but sadly not entirely eliminate, opportunities for corrupt and malicious asset forfeiture by for marijuana.
7
wombat-in-a-bikini Apr 23, 2026 +7
This has been an easy W lying on a silver platter for DECADES which Dems never seized despite widespread support from their base. Federal legalization of weed as an election goal will mobilize TONS of people
7
pokemomof03 Apr 23, 2026 +12
This was started by Bidens administration but got tons of push back from republicans.
12
Sit_Ubu_Sit-Good_Dog Apr 23, 2026 +16
> The order signed by Todd Blanche does not legalize marijuana for medical or recreational use under U.S. law. But it does change the way it’s regulated, shifting licensed medical marijuana from Schedule I — reserved for drugs without medical use and with high potential for abuse — to the less strictly regulated Schedule III. It also gives licensed medical marijuana operators a major tax break and eases some barriers to researching cannabis. >The Trump administration also said it was jump-starting the process for reclassifying marijuana more broadly, setting a hearing to begin in late June. This is bullshit. It only applies to medical marijuana. Is recreational still going to be treated as a schedule I? How do you only deschedule part of the industry? Edit: I should have kept reading the article. >Marijuana or marijuana-derived products that are not distributed through a state medical marijuana program will continue to be classified in Schedule I. This is laughably dumb. The same plant could be scheduled differently.
16
uberares Apr 23, 2026 +10
I wonder if someone with a Commercial Drivers license could now use this to get out of drug testing for weed.. I mean, by the looks of it, if you have a valid medical reason and are licensed you can now drive commercially with no issues. Im sure that wont happen tho, but wonder how long till it comes up as a case.
10
anywho123 Apr 23, 2026 +8
>”Trump signed an EO that can immedietly be undone by the next administration” FTFY. Can we stop pretending that this senile old man scribbling with his sharpie means anything permanent? Executive Orders are not legislation and are worth the paper they’re scribbled on.
8
roostercrowe Apr 23, 2026 +22
i hate for perfect to be the enemy of good but all i see this effectively doing is allowing producers to earn more profits by finally allow tax right offs - no way that this savings makes it down to consumers.
22
mediocre_remnants Apr 23, 2026 +55
It has nothing at all to do with consumers, it's about more opportunities for marijuana-based business. Besides the tax thing, it will allow more access to banking. Many banks weren't willing to work with marijuana companies even in legal states because of the federal scheduling.
55
ProfessionalCraft983 Apr 23, 2026 +12
The banking thing is actually kind of a big deal. Legal weed shops currently have to deal in cash only which can be a huge security risk. That being said, f*** Trump. One good thing does not excuse or make up for the fact that he raped children, threatened genocide multiple times, and has been eroding our democracy and pushing fascism since his first term.
12
threeoldbeigecamaros Apr 23, 2026 +11
Access to the banking system will attract capital
11
Numerous-Positions_5 Apr 23, 2026 +13
Now how about those Epstein files?
13
Knownzero Apr 23, 2026 +7
This started under a 2022 Biden era initiative.
7
← Back to Board