· 200 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 23, 2026 at 12:28 PM

Trump reclassifies state-licensed medical marijuana as a less-dangerous drug in a historic shift

Posted by citrus1330


Trump reclassifies state-licensed medical marijuana as a less-dangerous drug in a historic shift
AP News
Trump reclassifies state-licensed medical marijuana as a less-dangerous drug in a historic shift
A cannabis industry group calls President Donald Trump’s reclassification of state-licensed medical marijuana as a less-dangerous drug “the most significant federal advancement in cannabis policy" in decades.

🚩 Report this post

200 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
Sladay 2 days ago +1017
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-places-fda-approved-marijuana-products-and-products-containing-marijuana Only for those that have medical cannabis licenses. That's what it rescheduled to schedule three this morning. Further review of cannabis is scheduled for an expedited administrative hearing on June 29th. Small step forward but it's interesting to see where this goes.
1017
LordoftheChia 2 days ago +322
Yup, the relevant part of the article: >shifting licensed **medical marijuana** from Schedule I — reserved for drugs without medical use and with high potential for abuse — to the less strictly regulated Schedule III. It also gives **licensed medical marijuana** operators a major tax break and eases some barriers to researching cannabis.
322
Sladay 2 days ago +108
https://hightimes.com/news/politics/cannabis-rescheduling-could-happen-today-dont-call-it-legalization/ "It was also unclear Thursday how the order might affect operations in states where licensed recreational shops also serve registered medical patients. In Washington state, 302 of 460 licensed stores have endorsements allowing them to sell tax-free cannabis to registered patients — the implications for those operators remain to be clarified." It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out because I don't think anyone expected state medical cannabis and FDA approved cannabis treatments to be split from the rest of the cannabis review.
108
1800treflowers 1 day ago +8
I'm waiting to see if this affects Georgia. The medical cannabis bill is on the governors desk to sign into law but it hasn't happened yet. Wondering if this will help push it over the edge which would allow for stronger percentages. My dad's on it so I want to get something that actually works for his back pain.
8
WanderWut 2 days ago +35
I also read that this could also mean that for medical marijuana patients it would take out the need to test for THC. I mean if that’s true that would still be huge as it’s wild how you can be a legal patient and yet still not have a job due to actually consuming what you are legally prescribed. Of course we want it federally legal in general but this seemingly small step could be major in that regard at the very least.
35
girlinthegoldenboots 1 day ago +17
Some doctors won’t prescribe adhd meds if you are also a medical mj patient. Interesting to see how that shakes out there as well.
17
hashtagmoneyswag 1 day ago +8
There are already states that do this like NJ and NY - both illegal to discriminate based on appearance of THC in a drug test
8
trixilly 1 day ago +10
ah but say you work for a railroad and the FRA deems you as "safety sensitive" - a positive drug test will still remove you from your job even if its from CBD that's perfectly legal and non-intoxicating. Part of the problem with the test is that it tests for a metabolite & not for current intoxication. I would like sober operators & folks who are able to use their medical drugs in safe way & I don't know how we do that with current testing practices. The federal government loves to enforce its random drug testing practices.
10
hashtagmoneyswag 1 day ago +7
Actually extremely fair point. I actually completely forgot federal jobs aren’t subject to state law! Yeah I absolutely agree with you though - that should not be the case especially when it’s prescribed
7
Pinklady777 2 days ago +77
Will this mean that if you have a prescription for it, it won't count against you on a drug test?
77
ScrofessorLongHair 2 days ago +101
Exactly why I'm in this thread. You would assume so. But I haven't seen it explicitly stated. F*** everything else, this is absolutely f****** critical, imo.
101
Danger_McNasty 2 days ago +65
That’s still directly up to your employer. I assume more specifically it’s up to the discretion of the insurance company they use. My current employer allows the use (not during work, of course) as long as your medical license is up to date.
65
ModusNex 2 days ago +23
It's going to be up to if it's a safety hazard like if you operate heavy machinery. It being a doctors prescription changes the rules somewhat.
23
The_0ven 2 days ago +17
> Will this mean that if you have a prescription for it, it won't count against you on a drug test? The employer decides what counts against you
17
Sladay 2 days ago +11
True but off clock use will be the interesting factor, especially in states that protect off-clock use.. I saw some speculation that it could be an ADA issue that could open litigation on employers if you have a medical card and they deny outright without examining a potential "reasonable accommodation."
11
Justkeepbreathing123 2 days ago +5
It varies greatly based on where you live. There are no US federal protections against discrimination, including by employers, based on marijuana use, but there are some states and localities that have enacted protections
5
hali420 2 days ago +14
This is how it started in Canada my friend. You are on your way.
14
AnonymousInMI 2 days ago +4178
So still illegal on the federal level? Dumb. Should have been legalized decades ago.
4178
nosungdeeptongs 2 days ago +1441
It’s a policy you keep in your back pocket in case you make a major political f*** up like going to war with Iran.
1441
PsyOpBunnyHop 2 days ago +518
*And then they came for the potheads* *But I did nothing, because I got high*
518
spaceykc 2 days ago +34
Randy Walters is a son of a b****
34
Musiclover4200 2 days ago +12
That's why I fucked his wife and got filthy rich
12
LeaveThatCatAlone 2 days ago +156
Just don't steal my lemon pound cake. 
156
bballkj7 2 days ago +50
afroman is on his “Freedom of Speech” tour right now!! Lemon pound cake will be served at the set!!!!! Ask me how I know? I’m going, b****!!!
50
Soft-Detective-1514 2 days ago +55
Not Mama’s lemon pound cake!
55
OrbitalColony 2 days ago +5
🎵 Afroman will bring it to ya Afroman is gonna do ya Afroman is gonna screw ya My proof’s on the internet 🎵 https://youtu.be/HM8Ee6pcXvQ?si=9iB093AyFRaURUjd
5
orcusgrasshopperfog 2 days ago +16
Momma's pound cake? But it tastes so good
16
Popular-Rule 2 days ago +5
And don't touch the lemon cherry gelato too
5
ThatGuyWithCoolHair 2 days ago +15
*Da dada duhdaduh*
15
mattchewy43 2 days ago +7
I was gonna call my congressman, but then I got high.
7
TheThebanProphet 2 days ago +11
And then ICE raided my house because I got high~
11
UOLZEPHYR 2 days ago +102
This one. Its political point to use BECAUSE Trump is a popularist, he says things people like, Reclassify Marijuana No tax on tips Lower energy Lower gas And all the other bullshit hes spouted off. Ironically HIS republican held house and senate could very easily pass theough lege basically nailing all this shit done and closed - capping costs of stuff like insulin, cancer drugs, ending tax on tips and over time, capping costs on energy and gas ... f****** having Congress amend Controlled Substance Act and rescheduling Mary as Class 3 OR better - just declassified it in its entirely and letter the states decide (which is think he said originally was his end goal) - But, this guy is a liar and pedofile, hes bought and paid by AIPAC and Bibi, a traitor to the union. Release the Trump-Epstein Pedo Files
102
nosungdeeptongs 2 days ago +14
release the epstein files.  do not release the pedo files please.
14
microwavepetcarrier 2 days ago +14
Release the Pedo Files, lock up all the pedophiles.
14
devi83 2 days ago +18
> going to war with Iran. Which was a policy you keep in your back pocket in case you make a major f*** up like going to Epsteins island.
18
Sit_Ubu_Sit-Good_Dog 2 days ago +90
It’s so dumb. This only applies to medical. Recreational is still schedule I. The same plant could be scheduled differently depending on where it’s sold. >Marijuana or marijuana-derived products that are **not distributed through a state medical marijuana** program will continue to be classified in Schedule I.
90
cocktail_wiitch 2 days ago +594
I fully believe the prohibition of cannabis has everything to do with hemp and the impact it would have on major industries (oil, textiles, pharmaceuticals), and less about THC. They used to reefer madness propaganda to get people on board. I agree this should've been done a long time ago.
594
Massive-Rate-2011 2 days ago +533
We’ve been able to farm hemp for a while. Hemp isn’t banned. 
533
Halgy 2 days ago +111
Yep. Hemp is legal to the extent that CBD extracted from hemp (and the derivatives synthesized from it) are legal in my state, even though normal weed isn't.
111
sketchtireconsumer 2 days ago +114
> Yep. Hemp is legal to the extent that CBD extracted from hemp (and the derivatives synthesized from it) are legal in my state This ends this year
114
robodrew 2 days ago +41
Good job dumbass legislators, now the extraction will have to be done using low THC cannabis, and it will be a lot more labor intensive to make medications that have extremely low to no THC.
41
darkkilla123 2 days ago +63
moscow mitch snuck that in there because americans are not getting drunk enough and the alcohol buisness is struggling due to the rest of the worlds self emposed boycott of red state products
63
bo_dingles 2 days ago +19
>moscow mitch Wasn't just moscow mitch, the ruling class decided we don't need it under the cover of a "think of the children" bullshit move. Remember "the AGs sent a letter asking congress to fix that loophole", was 39 states, not just one side of the aisle: Alabama, Hawaii, Maryland, North Dakota, Arizona, Illinois, Massachusetts, Ohio, Arkansas, Indiana, Minnesota, Oklahoma, California, Iowa, Mississippi, Pennsylvania, Colorado, Kansas, Missouri, Puerto Rico, Connecticut, Louisiana, Nebraska, Rhode Island, Delaware, Maine, Nevada, South Carolina, Georgia, New Hampshire, New Mexico, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, U.S. Virgin Islands, New York, North Carolina, Wyoming Certainly some of this is to prop up that alcohol industry as genz is definitely not drinking at a rate of previous generations, but there's plenty more industries that benefit so here we are.
19
Halgy 2 days ago +14
I've been thinking that I should visit my friend in Missouri more often, anyway
14
clay_perview 2 days ago +249
You are forgetting the big player the alcohol industry, legal cannabis is crippling them.
249
pyronius 2 days ago +56
Yep. A while back, shortly after Louisiana saw a proliferation of legal, hemp-derived thc drinks, the state legislature started pushing to ban them. There was a huge backlash, but they kept pushing it forward. A little digging revealed that basically all the pressure for the ban was coming from a single local alcohol industry bigwig who also happened to be one of the Republican party's largest donors. Literally nobody *except* the alcohol industry wanted it banned. Even Republican politicians eventually had to cave and only impose restrictions on where it could be sold, because their own voters would have driven them out of town. The "compromise" was to ban it in bars *except* for the bars that were already selling it, which was basically all of them. So, basically any new bars (and there's a lot of churn in New Orleans, which is the largest market) would be forbidden from selling it.
56
VelvetElvis 2 days ago +29
The private prison industry.
29
Dzugavili 2 days ago +115
I mean, this is really it. Any competing intoxicant is a killer for casual drinking, and pot really fills in that niche.
115
HippyDM 2 days ago +101
It really did for me. Drank way too much in the Marines, got out and found weed, never looked back. Now beers will sit in my fridge for weeks.
101
Taint__Paint 2 days ago +54
Good for you, man! Same here. Switched from booze to bud and it’s made a world of difference in my life. Saved my marriage too. There is no reason for liquor to be legal and weed to still be seen as a horrible drug.
54
DannyPowers98 2 days ago +14
Same same. Never really had a problem with over drinking, but realized that it never really made me feel good. Switched to edibles instead. Much cheaper, lost some weight, and feel more mentally clear.
14
Ok_Astronomer_8667 2 days ago +6
Edibles are much healthier and won’t give you a hangover. Easy choice for me.
6
hyprmatt 2 days ago +14
This is exactly what I plan to do when I get out. I really think we'd have less weight issues in the military if we could smoke a joint instead of knock back a 6 pack on a Tuesday night.
14
espressocycle 2 days ago +8
It's not a killer for casual drinking. It's that the big players in the industry rely on alcoholics.
8
ApprehensiveYak3287 2 days ago +13
Alcohol is terrible and deserves to be taken down by cannabis in my opinion!
13
insanitazer 2 days ago +9
Apparently, enough of Trump's friends got into the cannabis business on an industrial level for him to loosen the laws and start making money there
9
ElGrapeApe 2 days ago +101
https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/RS22131 The farm bill gave broad legalization to hemp.
101
Eggmegmuffin 2 days ago +106
And the bug beautiful bill closed that loophole
106
Mature_BOSTN 2 days ago +51
Belief is a wonderful thing . . . but facts?? There's no way that hemp would disrupt "oil, textiles, pharmaceuticals" in any meaningful way. Im not sure where this 'religion' around hemp comes from, but the maths don't math. There is nothing SO UNIQUE about hemp that if fully legal it would disrupt any of those industries when no other plant has come close.
51
BPD_trash_panda 2 days ago +9
It's got more to do with the fact that it's very hard to make money off of it pharmaceutically (or at all really) if it's legal. It's not called "Weed" for no reason, pretty much anyone can grow it. If it were 100% legal, well theres not much of an industry because a few folks can do homegrows of enough weed to supply an entire neighborhood really. Greenhouses and grow operations have high over head and would never be able to compete with people just growing it on their own in their garden or as a hobby. So they'd prefer to keep it somewhat illegal so that they can make money off of it.
9
Mature_BOSTN 2 days ago +11
I can understand that the cannabis grow and retail industry wants to keep it regulated. But "big oil" and "big pharma" and "big fiber" . . . I call BS on those having vested interests. And given the popularity of edibles and various formats . . . I'm not so sure that homegrown dried leaves products would run dispensaries out of business. But I'm not a user so what do I know?
11
Guardian_of_theBlind 2 days ago +9
It's actually mostly about alcohol. Alcohol consumption went down considerably in the states and countries that legalized. The same effect can be currently seen in Germany and this is also the reason why our conservative parties were so against it. And weed is way more healthy (Not smoking weed, smoking weed is ridiculously unhealthy) and way less dangerous than alcohol.
9
TheDrAlbrhect 2 days ago +29
That was one thing, the other thing was straight up racism. Dark-skinned minorities depicted as alcoholics or druggies has been a thing since...basically when the US became independent.
29
Aggravating-Salad441 2 days ago +22
This is the actual, historical answer. Marijuana was associated with racist tropes about Mexican immigrants.
22
virtualjupiter 2 days ago +11
This is the correct answer. Racism is the primary excuse for cannabis prohibition. 
11
keylimedragon 2 days ago +9
Historically it was more about anti-black and anti-latino racism at first, or at least using it that way. Nixon was also directly responsible even though he admitted that it was "not particularly dangerous". It was useful for him to target anti-war hippie protestors plus black and Latino people. I believe the tobacco and alcohol industry might have had something to do with it later, but they didn't even know to lobby about it back when it was first made and kept at schedule I. It's also possible that old conservatives had it drilled into their brains for years and years that drugs including weed are bad, or they think their constituents really don't want legalization. Old habits die hard.
9
sirbassist83 2 days ago +26
close-ish, its still banned because of the alcohol and tobacco lobbies.
26
Dzugavili 2 days ago +13
I don't think tobacco lobbies against it: marijuana does not compete against tobacco. There's been signs that a lot of the tobacco companies have been looking at getting into the market; just the material scales are very different, because very few people could smoke a pack of joints every day. But tobacco seems to be on its way out, so they might not have much of a choice about adapting.
13
Round-Butterscotch48 2 days ago +17
Tobacco wants it legal. Not only is Big tobacco is a fan of anything that helps normalize smoking plant material. What other industry has more experience cultivating, harvesting and packaging a plant to be smoked ? As people continue to smoke less and less cigarettes. Legal marijuana is the perfect use of existing production and distribution infrastructure. Legal marijuana is the future of big tobacco.
17
Independent-Name4478 2 days ago +1557
I want full federal legalization, it’s just stupid it hasn’t happened.
1557
Corgiboom2 2 days ago +392
But that would ruin a campaign talking point.
392
threemo 2 days ago +61
What campaign talking point?
61
Zilithahz 2 days ago +135
Ironically it being in this weird limbo schedule 3 area is beneficial to both sides when it comes to campaigning. The democrats can say "we will fully legalize it federally" and Republicans can say "we will bring it back to schedule 1" but I am guessing that neither of them will do anything because they will lose a point to yap about.
135
TwoPoundzaSausage 2 days ago +41
It's funny, because that's the cause of all of this political division in this country: Politicians maintaining wedge issues to ensure job security.
41
AwarenessOk2359 1 day ago +14
Do any Republicans ever say that?
14
CranberryLast4683 2 days ago +6
It seems the parties are divided on the age old question of how to tax it rather than whether or not it should be allowed.
6
insidli 2 days ago +2085
Cool what about federal employee medical use?? Edit: omg 17 years on Listnook and I’ve never gotten this many upvotes!
2085
Justifiably_Bad_Take 2 days ago +1375
Both the FBI and CIA are perpetually low on white-hat hackers because- 1. Private sector pays magnitudes better 2. They literally cannot find people with a professional background in hacking who haven't smoked weed in the last 2 years
1375
Live-Pea4081 2 days ago +635
Its 3 years. I was 3 years clean and then this admin came about and it was not a govt I wanted to work for so I started back again 
635
Water_offaduck_13 2 days ago +135
That's a great point People who were on the fence because of those things could very likely easily flip to be who they want and not work for a shitty administration.
135
Journalist_Radiant 2 days ago +4
This is what happened to me. I’m not a hacker, but I got out of the military to go to school with plans to go back in and commission. That plan is now out the window because there’s no way I’m gambling being in during an insane and stupid administration.
4
crowwreak 2 days ago +39
I'm just picturing this as a recruiter showing up to your door and you answering lighting up with one hand and flipping him off with the other
39
LethalBacon 2 days ago +186
YEP, I backed out from an interview process for a Software role recently because of this. Even CBD use didn't fly. So f****** stupid.
186
ButterH2 2 days ago +113
f****** CBD??? what next, ibuprofen use?
113
jdm219 2 days ago +75
Ironically the government absolutely pumps that stuff to soldiers in lieu of medical treatment. Probably so many destroyed livers from it.
75
N3rdr4g3 2 days ago +77
Ibuprofen (advil) causes stomach ulcers with overuse, but doesn't damage your liver. Acetaminophen (Tylenol) causes liver damage with overuse.
77
Vanviator 2 days ago +5
TMC = Tylenol Motrin Codine, lol *It's actually Troop Medical Clinic, but your 99% gonna leave with one of the above.
5
dj92wa 2 days ago +5
800mg Motrin in a giant white bottle. Take a knee, drink water. “Beat the heat, drill sar’, beat the heat!”
5
DogAnusJesus 2 days ago +9
Tbf, I've been a soldier. Ibuprofen is but a small part of the liver destroying equation.
9
Sethmeisterg 2 days ago +5
Yea but being a raging alcoholic is just fine.
5
Dull_Job_6372 2 days ago +6
My dad worked in IT his whole career as a dba and never got tested. Meanwhile he smoked like a chimney since he was 14 lol. How times change.
6
bronsonrider 2 days ago +8
Friend of mine was the IT guy for a big company near me that was taken over by a US firm who bought in drug testing. My mate explained to them that he’d been smoking for 40 years, 20 of them at this firm, and nobody had ever bought it up before. The new manager gave him some c*** speech and my mate said fair enough and quit on the spot. This caused massive problems for them and 2 days later he’s back at work and they forgot about the testing. They tried to get him to teach someone else to do the job but he’s not that stupid. Worked there and smoked every day till he retired.
8
BPD_trash_panda 2 days ago +92
Yup. And then they end up contracting out to companies where the folks there all hold the same clearances but never get tested so they all smoke weed. I'm very familiar with the industry and it's hilarious quite frankly. The FBI and CIA pay poorly and won't hire people who have smoked weed. They then end up spending MORE money than they would have just hiring and paying some pot head hacker to have a govt contract with a private company staffed by a bunch of people who smoke weed. It makes no sense at all.
92
Issah_Wywin 2 days ago +8
Crazy that they don't have the same standards on alcohol drinking. "Oh, you drank beer 3 nights ago? You're fired"
8
Gronkattack 2 days ago +109
I mean the director of the FBI does coke so does it really matter?
109
Wittyname0 2 days ago +48
It's always ok when the guys on top do it. We're talking about us peons
48
inspectoroverthemine 2 days ago +16
Coke has _always_ been ok if you are in the right circles.
16
Hairy_Mycologist_945 2 days ago +23
Doubtful. They can be functional alcoholics but if they touch CBD they're suddenly engaged in moral turpitude or some bullshit.
23
Mastershroom 2 days ago +7
Your alcoholism doesn't even have to be functional if you're the Secretary of Defense.
7
kylewhatever 2 days ago +13
This is completely anecdotal but my gf switched jobs as a federal employee. She got drug tested, failed. They still let her keep her job and just had her re test a month later which she passed and has abstained since.
13
FiestyShibas 2 days ago +5
If he changes it to legal use for federal employees…. And the age change on military sign up. We might be looking at something bigger fellas. Piece it together.
5
jakelazerz 2 days ago +602
Nobody from the Epstein files has been prosecuted.
602
40to6inthe4th 2 days ago +164
The current AG literally said they will "not prosecute any predators from the Epstein files". The admit they know there are predators and outright say they wont prosecute them. Its going to take social revolt to get any changes done that we want to see at this point. The government at almost every level has proven they dont give a flying f*** about what the citizens want or need.
164
jakelazerz 2 days ago +19
It sets a dangerous precedent: We do not hold our elected officials to a higher standard and they can blatantly commit heinous crimes with no repercussions. Waiting out the clock is not going to fix anything, as the worst humans in the world (moreso than now) will continue to gravitate towards elected positions.
19
seeingeyegod 2 days ago +15
The Dow, The Dow
15
QuestshunQueen 2 days ago +1657
Didn't Biden start the ball rolling in 2021? https://www.npr.org/2024/05/01/1248403456/the-biden-administration-advances-its-aim-to-reclassify-marijuana
1657
Sabertooth767 2 days ago +741
He did, yes, but it seems either of them could always have just done this, since the order simply goes around the review process.
741
SomeDEGuy 2 days ago +280
I honestly don't know if it is legal for him to go around the review process, but it would not surprise me to find out that he did something illegal. At least this one is positive.
280
Sabertooth767 2 days ago +87
The legal justification is that federal law allows the attorney general to determine the appropriate classification for drugs that the U.S. must regulate pursuant to an international treaty. Will that reasoning hold up in court? I imagine we will see.
87
graveybrains 2 days ago +46
The law also requires the attorney general consult with the secretary of health and human services, evaluate the decision according to a list of criteria provided by congress, and the whole thing is subject to the regular rule making procedures (it also doesn't apply to anything explicitly scheduled by an act of congress, but that doesn't apply to marijuana). If they skipped all those steps I expect it'll get laughed out of court. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title21-section811&num=0&edition=prelim
46
espressocycle 2 days ago +11
SCOTUS has already invalidated multiple laws binding the executive branch, so what's one more?
11
HYDROMORPHONE_ZONE 2 days ago +47
Yeah legally we can’t even change the scheduling according to the different international treaties we are part of and created. Will that stop us? Probably not. Will other countries legalize? Maybe.
47
SkiingAway 2 days ago +36
Canada has legalized federally without issue.
36
thecashblaster 2 days ago +6
and Germany
6
cwaterbottom 2 days ago +6
Now that's interesting and new to me, do you have a name of a treaty or something I can look up when I get some time?
6
Binary-Trees 2 days ago +3
I think they are referring to the Single Convention of Narcotic Drugs.
3
ReserveFormal3910 2 days ago +19
The difference is if a democrat tried this Republicans would be up in arms decrying federal overreach, but...
19
SLUnatic85 2 days ago +11
trump has avoided the review process his entire presidency(s).
11
atreeismissing 2 days ago +12
This order doesn't go around the review process because the review process was completed under Biden. There are 2 ways to reschedule marijuana: 1. Congress passes a law 2. The President orders a review by HHS and DOJ and upon their review then writes and Executive Order rescheduling it (though to be fair, before the EO happens the President is supposed to work with Congress to update any laws that may be impacted by the EO which essentially moves it all back to option #1). Biden did the review process but hadn't written an EO, Trump wrote this EO without working with Congress, which means nothing will change other than possibly how the DOJ interprets state medical marijuana licenses, something the federal govt had already not been bothering to enforce at the federal level. AP News calling it an historic shift is just more white washing of Trump's faux-accomplishments.
12
EquipmentMaterial540 2 days ago +12
if Biden had done it, Republicans would have fought him tooth and nail. Trump can do it because Democrats also support it, there's no one who wants to fight over it.
12
frosty_lizard 2 days ago +41
I assume he and his admin think that relaxing weed laws will save him with voters 😂 I'm sure his approval ratings have nothing to do with trade wars, ICE terrorizing the country, almost starting WW3 by threating to annihilate after attacking them and Lebanon (BC why not attack another country while your at it)
41
fer_sure 2 days ago +37
>think that relaxing weed laws will save him with voters As they say, a libertarian is a conservative who smokes pot. This could maybe get a few young men to come out to vote rather than stay home for the midterms.
37
rrdubbs 2 days ago +12
That’s gotta be the intent here. Caesar’s games in the Colosseum to distract from failures.
12
m1sterlurk 2 days ago +8
"State-licensed medical" being deemed "legal" while "unlicensed" weed is still Schedule I, meaning that our law enforcement has deemed it a substance with no medical usefulness. Destroying our entire drug law infrastructure needs to happen very badly.
8
Fadedcamo 2 days ago +10
It definitely doesn't hurt. I mean keeping weed illegal at this point is benefiting who? Some law enforcement and prison lobbys? Everyone sees where the wind has been blowing on legalization of this drug for a decade or more. There's plenty of low information voters out there who will hear all this random shit about how bad Trump is and this and that about corruption and shrug and think "both sides". Except trump legalized it. So good enough for them.
10
projexion_reflexion 2 days ago +16
Schrodinger's court would've stopped Biden in his tracks. 
16
asque2000 2 days ago +36
Biden got the ball rolling on reclassification, and trump put a stop to it, and then did the same thing in order to take credit for it.
36
naththegrath10 2 days ago +103
Yes, and it’s actually a microcosm of the failure of the Biden administration. They started the slow roll process of things getting better but didn’t want to actually rock the boat so it just kicked the can down the road a bit. Eventually leaving the door open for someone else to take credit
103
SvenTropics 2 days ago +117
I still think it's crazy that every single time a ballot initiative has come up to legalize recreational marijuana since 2008, it has had over 50% of the votes. This means, just among voting people, more than half of them want it to be completely legal for recreational adult use. Not even a prescription medication. In one of those cases, it didn't pass because the state requires 60%, but it got within a few percent of that. Then you look at the politicians, and they're like "well I guess we can make it from the most serious possible dangerous category to the less serious but still totally dangerous category."
117
AgnewsHeadlessClone 2 days ago +46
Florida checking in. Yeah, we needed 60% due to a prior ballot measure. The previous ballot measure made it so all future ballot measures would need 60% to pass. If I recall, the 60% amendment passed with much less than 60%
46
BrainCane 2 days ago +13
And they stopped counting at 57%..
13
justlikethatmeh 2 days ago +650
Only trying so soften the republican party's image for the mid terms.
650
Going_Native 2 days ago +388
Ohio voted to legalize recreational use and now the republican controlled statehouse is rolling parts of it back. So much for popular opinion.
388
ToiletPunisher19 2 days ago +130
If it makes the people of Ohio feel any better South Dakota straight up said no to the ballot initiative to legalize it
130
karny90 2 days ago +108
Tennessee won’t even allow us to vote on it because it would pass. Instead they passed a law that would still make it illegal even if it’s legal federally.
108
fevered_visions 2 days ago +34
"party of freedom"
34
karny90 2 days ago +19
Tennessee is blasted with propaganda constantly to the point a vast majority believe Democrats are a detriment to society even though we haven’t had a democratic governor since ‘11. It’s been straight up Republicans across the board, in every position since then. But somehow it’s not their fault, it’s the democrats. (We’ve had a massive influx of non-resident conservatives over the years who move here for the no state income tax and have completely taken over every aspect of the government to set up their own personal “safe space”)
19
Specialist-Bee-9406 2 days ago +11
So do we Canadians need to smoke more weed and exhale it over the border?  We can piggyback it on the forest fire smoke. 
11
-SHAI_HULUD 2 days ago +25
Kristy Noem got tired of terrorizing South Dakota so she decided to terrorize the entire country. What a c***.
25
Geno0wl 2 days ago +10
Didn't they do some fuckery with that? Like they saw a ballot initiative and passed their own weed legalization law that canceled the ballot initiative, but then after the submission deadline repealed the law they just passed.
10
End3rWi99in 2 days ago +4
I really don't get it. They can look to dozens of other states that have fully legalized and have absolutely no problems from it, and a shit load of new tax income. Who even are the lobbying groups against it at this point?
4
sixcharlie 2 days ago +18
South Dakota voted for full legalization back in 2019. Kristi Noem decided the voters didn't understand the referendum so it's still not legal.
18
Halgy 2 days ago +6
South Dakota voted to legalize recreational use several years ago, and Noem flat out ignored it. Nebraska legalized medical use two years ago, and the GOP governor/legislature is doing everything in their power to avoid actually implementing it.
6
interprime 2 days ago +5
Same thing happened in VA. The public voted on legalization, it passed, and then Youngkin basically went “Nuh uh” and blocked any attempts to allow recreational dispensaries to open.
5
Scaryclouds 2 days ago +9
Feels familiar as a Missourian… the Missouri state house loves to constantly undermine ballot measures when it enacts something an inch to the left on Ronald Reagan.  Yet people continue to vote in Republicans 🙄
9
nloxxx 2 days ago +8
I just quit smoking weed and this new law still pisses me off so much as an Ohioan. One of the reps said something along the lines of, “Voters knew we could come along and make changes at any time, we’re still following what the voters want,” while stripping out parts that the voters wanted.
8
Shadow293 2 days ago +16
Not going to work.
16
jcooli09 2 days ago +417
Release the Epstein files.
417
[deleted] 2 days ago +8
[removed]
8
OGLikeablefellow 2 days ago +31
Yeah wtf
31
SurferRay 2 days ago +17
I think this has more to do with the upcoming ruling in U.S. vs Hemani than anything. Sounds like SCOTUS is going to rule in favor of 2A so that people can smoke weed and have guns. Big win for surface level Libertarians.
17
Vreas 2 days ago +68
Doesn’t mean shit when it’s still restricted. Ohio legalized a few years ago and somehow we now have MORE restrictions on what weed we can smoke or consume and where we can get it from.. it’s a f****** felony to even possess weed from another state or have it outside of its original packaging. They’ve consistently cut back grow allowances from weight to plants you’re allowed to have.. Politicians only care about making their investor friends rich.
68
Easih 2 days ago +12
wow thats crazy.
12
Vreas 2 days ago +24
Yeah man we had an awesome like 3 month window where restaurants and bars were serving thc edible drinks as long as you didn’t buy alcohol at the same time. You could buy disposable vapes, prerolls, knock off thca flower, etc at corner stores. Then they restricted everything down to only being able to buy from extremely overpriced dispensaries. Like I get regulated it to an extent but seems ridiculous. A judge just barred them from enforcing the corner store ban. It’s sad there’s so many empty shelves in beer carry outs and corner stores where they used to have all their products and were making a killing.
24
nloxxx 2 days ago +12
Gutted a whole job market with that, from what I’ve read. It’s alright though, those jobs are being replaced with *checks notes* a contract with Anduril Industries to build defense systems in Columbus.
12
bobandshawn 2 days ago +14
"It also gives licensed medical marijuana operators a major tax break and eases some barriers to researching cannabis."...so prices will be coming down...right?
14
AudibleNod 2 days ago +166
He couldn't have done this earlier in the week? I swear, he has no sense of timing.
166
liesliesfromtinyeyes 2 days ago +56
I bet he bet on it not to be on 4/20 on Polymarket
56
MentalSky_ 2 days ago +101
Reclassification is not decriminalization though.  You can still get arrested and charged. Just perhaps not be sentence to life in jail Whereas in Canada nothing happens to you
101
694meok 2 days ago +30
I can see the cam footage already. Dude in MAGA hat smoking weed while driving, cops pull him over, he yells "But Trump made it legal!!"
30
Squat_Cobbler89 2 days ago +29
“Oh I’m sorry I thought this was America!”
29
geodebug 2 days ago +27
Still going to recriminalize hemp-derived THC in November so this is mostly meaningless.
27
perditaman 1 day ago +8
Wake me up when i can smoke on Saturday morning and not get fired from a random on Monday
8
DannyStress 1 day ago +6
See the democrats could have legalized it federally and had a massive amount of support thanks to new revenue streams through taxes. But no, they let Trump do this so he can tout it during the midterms and try to get votes
6
PraxicalExperience 1 day ago +6
While this sounds like something good, it's not. This will just allow pharmaceutical companies to get a stranglehold on the weed market. It also provides reasoning behind banning home grows: well, we don't let people make any *other* scheduled medicine at home, do we? It should not be scheduled at all.
6
HereToCalmYouDown 2 days ago +55
Sorry Trump... I love weed but I still hate you and the Republican party.
55
ProfessionalCraft983 2 days ago +11
Couldn’t have said it better myself.
11
CivilAgent3443 2 days ago +6
So f****** stupid, shit should’ve been legalized on a federal level decades ago.
6
PerpetuallyStartled 1 day ago +6
Democrats had the opportunity to take this win for years and years.
6
padbodh 2 days ago +65
Oh his internal approval polling must be low low
65
Psianth 2 days ago +16
Nah, he just has buddies in the industry who pay him well. Remember the cbd thing?
16
padbodh 2 days ago +21
I’m not astute but I have been paying attention for ~25 years and presidents only pull the weed lever when things are at their worst
21
ChesterComics 2 days ago +7
My prediction is right before midterms he'll sign some executive order to legalize it in an attempt to garner votes (don't forget the insider trading part as well) knowing full well that SCOTUS will just shoot it down.
7
ellus1onist 2 days ago +4
Living in Michigan I genuinely forget sometimes that weed is still widely illegal in this country. There are literally like 7 dispensaries within a 15 minute drive of me
4
InFin0819 2 days ago +4
This is just a good policy change. Not going to let my opinion of him otherwise cloud that.
4
Kind-Philosopher5077 2 days ago +5
That pedophile isn't doing anything other than distracting from his failures
5
PlayedUOonBaja 2 days ago +4
**Key Details on the Marijuana Review:** Initial Action (2022): President Biden called for a administrative review of how marijuana is scheduled under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) and issued pardons for federal simple possession offenses. HHS Recommendation (2023): The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) recommended that the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) reclassify marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III. Proposed Rule (2024): The Biden administration formally proposed reclassifying marijuana to Schedule III, recognizing its medical use, but this is not full legalization or decriminalization. Current Status & Next Steps (2026) President Donald Trump’s acting attorney general on Thursday signed an order reclassifying state-licensed medical marijuana as a less-dangerous drug. [-source](https://lamag.com/news-and-politics/biden-administration-moves-to-reclassify-cannabis-report/#:~:text=It%20is%20currently%20classified%20as,share%20the%20love!)
4
recjus85 2 days ago +19
Great, he's still a piece of shit.
19
yolo_speedwagon 2 days ago +19
Great! Still voting Democrat!
19
SeaworthinessSalt119 2 days ago +4
This ain’t shit. Tell me when it’s no longer classified.
4
Benromaniac 2 days ago +4
Should be at least on the same level as cigarettes and alcohol.
4
ZenRage 2 days ago +5
Of course it is still illegal. Prisons and policing are major industries in the US with a huge lobby. Being able to say, "I smell pot" is a very effective and time tested way for police to circumvent your 4th amendment rights which are otherwise a bar to a stop, a detention, a frisk, a search, an arrest, etc. that they want to push more people into the legal and prison system. This is all about money.
5
Aethermancer 1 day ago +4
It's all bullshit until they let federal employees use it. That's the real indicator of an actual policy change.
4
Grand_Fruit_9039 1 day ago +5
I really don't understand why people are happy about this. it's still federally illegal. this is literally nothing. grow up people. realize this is a nothing burger
5
minervascats 2 days ago +25
They know legalization will kill their market 💀
25
SuperTopperHarley 2 days ago +22
No. They just have to have a system in place to profit from the gold rush coming with legalization.
22
minervascats 2 days ago +8
This is what I'm saying... If they just randomly legalize across the board then they can't profit by keeping it "prescription only" or whatever other restrictions they have the power to enforce 
8
Adopteddaughtermargo 2 days ago +18
Cool now release the Epstein files
18
L_Cranston_Shadow 2 days ago +7
Unless I missed it, one thing the article doesn't mention, but is incredibly important, is that this also opens up banking to marijuana companies. Previously, all federally banking facilities, i.e. all banks, couldn't do business with them for fear of prosecution. This also should limit, but sadly not entirely eliminate, opportunities for corrupt and malicious asset forfeiture by for marijuana.
7
wombat-in-a-bikini 2 days ago +7
This has been an easy W lying on a silver platter for DECADES which Dems never seized despite widespread support from their base. Federal legalization of weed as an election goal will mobilize TONS of people
7
pokemomof03 2 days ago +12
This was started by Bidens administration but got tons of push back from republicans.
12
Sit_Ubu_Sit-Good_Dog 2 days ago +16
> The order signed by Todd Blanche does not legalize marijuana for medical or recreational use under U.S. law. But it does change the way it’s regulated, shifting licensed medical marijuana from Schedule I — reserved for drugs without medical use and with high potential for abuse — to the less strictly regulated Schedule III. It also gives licensed medical marijuana operators a major tax break and eases some barriers to researching cannabis. >The Trump administration also said it was jump-starting the process for reclassifying marijuana more broadly, setting a hearing to begin in late June. This is bullshit. It only applies to medical marijuana. Is recreational still going to be treated as a schedule I? How do you only deschedule part of the industry? Edit: I should have kept reading the article. >Marijuana or marijuana-derived products that are not distributed through a state medical marijuana program will continue to be classified in Schedule I. This is laughably dumb. The same plant could be scheduled differently.
16
uberares 2 days ago +10
I wonder if someone with a Commercial Drivers license could now use this to get out of drug testing for weed.. I mean, by the looks of it, if you have a valid medical reason and are licensed you can now drive commercially with no issues. Im sure that wont happen tho, but wonder how long till it comes up as a case.
10
anywho123 2 days ago +8
>”Trump signed an EO that can immedietly be undone by the next administration” FTFY. Can we stop pretending that this senile old man scribbling with his sharpie means anything permanent? Executive Orders are not legislation and are worth the paper they’re scribbled on.
8
roostercrowe 2 days ago +22
i hate for perfect to be the enemy of good but all i see this effectively doing is allowing producers to earn more profits by finally allow tax right offs - no way that this savings makes it down to consumers.
22
mediocre_remnants 2 days ago +55
It has nothing at all to do with consumers, it's about more opportunities for marijuana-based business. Besides the tax thing, it will allow more access to banking. Many banks weren't willing to work with marijuana companies even in legal states because of the federal scheduling.
55
ProfessionalCraft983 2 days ago +12
The banking thing is actually kind of a big deal. Legal weed shops currently have to deal in cash only which can be a huge security risk. That being said, f*** Trump. One good thing does not excuse or make up for the fact that he raped children, threatened genocide multiple times, and has been eroding our democracy and pushing fascism since his first term.
12
threeoldbeigecamaros 2 days ago +11
Access to the banking system will attract capital
11
Numerous-Positions_5 2 days ago +13
Now how about those Epstein files?
13
Knownzero 2 days ago +7
This started under a 2022 Biden era initiative.
7
← Back to Board