For context: Congresswoman Duckworth made a public statement confirming to the press that DHS could have been paying TSA this whole time.
During this, and still ongoing - the Senate has hung up on a vote, that has been fully voted on (100 votes in and counted) to prevent a Senator (who is still live-tweeting) from demanding Unanimous Consent to fund TSA outright.
Edit: The Republican Senator claiming to want/is attempting to force a clean TSA-only funding bill is [John Kennedy](https://xcancel.com/ArthurDelaneyHP/status/2037216792125333653#m). Sorry for taking so long to find/post this information. Arthur Delaney is a Huffington Post reporter, who contacted Senator Kennedy directly.
Trump heard both of those things and immediately 'signed an order' (called Markwayne Mullin's cell phone) to pay TSA.
It has nothing to do with Trump or DHS. They got full-nelsoned out of lying to the entire country for fourty one days.
3552
Pale-Factor-8574Mar 26, 2026
+1255
I love Tammy Duckworth. 😍
1255
fuboMar 27, 2026
+543
I would gladly vote for her for President. The last time we picked the junior senator from Illinois it went kinda okay.
543
Guitarist970Mar 27, 2026
+1
She’s actually be the senior senator if she declared for 2028 as Durbin is retiring when his term is up this year. She’d have my vote as a life long illinois resident.
1
ObeseTsunamiMar 27, 2026
+89
Technically we fought the bloodiest war in US history after he was elected… but it was a worthwhile cause. If only we’d snuffed out and prosecuted the losing side much harder.
Edit: Just saw that you meant Obama. My bad!
89
Environmental_Leg_74Mar 27, 2026
+67
We all make mistakes and yours was pretty funny. I was sitting here trying to remember what war Obama got us into and how it was bigger than the civil war. Thanks for the chuckle.
67
ObeseTsunamiMar 27, 2026
+1
I always just think of Lincoln as the president from Illinois even though he was born in Kentucky. And I think of Obama as the president from Hawaii even though he was the senator from Illinois. I think that technically the only president we’ve ever had that was born in Illinois was Reagan, but I think of him as the jackass from California.
1
W1nt3rmu4eMar 27, 2026
+1
You know, that actually checks out. You’re fine.
1
JafookiMar 27, 2026
+58
They're talking about Obama
58
ObeseTsunamiMar 27, 2026
+22
I know, I edited my comment. I always forget he was the senator from Illinois.
22
Metro42014Mar 26, 2026
+174
> During this, and still ongoing - the Senate has hung up on a vote, that has been fully voted on (100 votes in and counted) to prevent a Senator (who is still live-tweeting) from demanding Unanimous Consent to fund TSA outright.
Could you explain that more?
How is anything hung up on a vote that's complete?
174
Duane_Mar 26, 2026
+606
See for yourself, it's [still live](https://www.senate.gov/legislative/floor_activity_pail.htm).
Though all senators have voted on the motion, the current Pro Tempore won't close/tally the vote and move on to the next piece of business on the table.
___
A Republican(!) senator has claimed on Twitter that if the vote ends, he plans to immediately ask for unanimous consent to fund TSA regardless of other bills (and he's likely serious, as they have now held this vote open for FOUR HOURS to prevent it.)
Edit: The Republican Senator claiming to want a clean TSA-only funding bill is [John Kennedy](https://xcancel.com/ArthurDelaneyHP/status/2037216792125333653#m). Sorry for taking so long to find/post this information. Arthur Delaney is a Huffington Post reporter, who contacted Senator Kennedy directly.
___
No matter what, TSA was going to get funded today, and Trump has been buying time by telling the Senate Speaker to not 'close' or tally the vote. His 'executive order' claim is just his response to being fucked into a corner by the media + a defecting Senator who is tired of the bullshit while TSA starve.
606
diemunkiesdieMar 27, 2026
+77
>A Republican(!) senator
who?
>Senate Speaker
You mean the Majority Leader Senator John Thune? The House is the one with a Speaker. Or do you mean the person who is currently lowecase s speaking on the floor?
77
CalamityClambakeMar 27, 2026
+62
Yeah I also can't figure out what this person is trying to say. My best guess is that they are not American so they are using the wrong words for things.
62
chubbysumoMar 27, 2026
+167
That GOP senator is likely facing a viable dem challenger and they cant spin it anymore.
167
PhotoguppyMar 27, 2026
+53
And now they'll face a GOP Senator for going against dear leader.
53
Duane_Mar 27, 2026
+1
John Kennedy is not up for re-election until 2028 - so maybe he's just done watching govt. employees get fucked.
Especially because he's probably got a flight to catch - Senate and Congress go on recess this week, for the next two.
1
SteppeCollectiveMar 27, 2026
+1
The real answer. They have vacations coming up.
1
Shopworn_SoulMar 27, 2026
+26
>His 'executive order' claim is just his response to being fucked into a corner by the media + a defecting Senator who is tired of the bullshit while TSA starve.
Let's be honest, he fucked himself into that corner all by himself. He's a big boy doing big boy things.
26
CalamityClambakeMar 27, 2026
+32
The Speaker of the House is not in the Senate.
The person running the vote in the Senate is either the Vice President or the President Pro Tempore.
What "Speaker" are you talking about?
Are you trying to say that a senator is doing a talking filibuster? That still wouldn't make sense, as if the votes had already been counted, the filibuster would be over.
32
ddesla2Mar 27, 2026
+1
Haha I'm so f****** confused. I feel like I need an ELI5 of this ELI5 or w/e op wants to call it. Someone break this down like I'm a single celled o*****. Yeh, I know and meant what I said.
1
Pretend_Spray_11Mar 27, 2026
+17
It’s weird you’ve written multiple posts about this but won’t write the name of said senator
17
LividTacosMar 27, 2026
+5
Just slight correction, I assume you mean Majority Leader, not Speaker.
5
ndasmithMar 27, 2026
+80
Senator Duckworth told the press that the Department of Homeland Security already had the authority to pay TSA from money that was already there. Then the President told Senator Mullin to order that TSA agents should be paid immediately. Duckworth telling the press factual information is the reason.
80
tasiewbaoMar 27, 2026
+1
I don't get it. Is this a secret that only Duckworth knows? Why has no one else mentioned this like, 40 days ago. Why hasn't the press been writing about it? Why am I getting the sense that no one actually knows how this government actually works.
1
HereToFixDeineCableMar 27, 2026
+24
Project 2025 desperate to check off another box and privatize TSA by making them all miserable and quit.
24
Duane_Mar 27, 2026
+1
Hopefully it just turns into a lawsuit - they were able to have paid TSA the whole time, and didn't, which means the Executive Branch was impounding allocated funds. AGAIN.
1
diemunkiesdieMar 27, 2026
+23
>prevent a Senator (who is still live-tweeting)
Who? Name names?
23
Lowbacca1977Mar 27, 2026
+1
I think it may be John Kennedy of Louisiana. I can find an article about that from several hours ago from Mediatite discussing that possibility
1
memphisjonesMar 27, 2026
+47
This needs to be blasted everywhere. The democrats are getting crushed in the communication department
47
mduellMar 27, 2026
+21
Why has no one pointed this out in national media for 40 days?
21
ThreeKiloZeroMar 27, 2026
+1
Because the media is owned by a bunch of billionare magats?
1
modernmannMar 27, 2026
+10
Disgusting. Lie, cheat, steal pick 3
10
RedIzBkMar 27, 2026
+5
is there a link to the public statement?
5
matadataMar 27, 2026
+3
The info out there is pretty sparse so far. I could only find a couple of posts, including [this one](https://x.com/TimInHonolulu/status/2037305846955458607), which is an audio recording of her making the confirmation to a reporter.
3
Straight-Ad6926Mar 26, 2026
+1996
I’m sure the TSA agents who have been living on thoughts and prayers for six weeks will be thrilled to receive an executive order instead of a backdated mortgage payment.
1996
johnnycyberpunkMar 27, 2026
+377
What about the rest of DHS?
Still tens of thousands of unpaid federal workers…
377
LividTacosMar 27, 2026
+335
That Republicans could negotiate with Dems today to get paid. But instead, they think Democrats should roll over to their "mandate".
335
leffe186Mar 27, 2026
+1
They already did, and Trump nixed it.
1
CleanbriefsMar 27, 2026
+1
It’s disgusting the number of bots on Yahoo News comments blaming the democrats for everything.
X is a cesspool of bot farms blaming the democrats
1
baebae4455Mar 27, 2026
+1
Who tf reads Yahoo News comments?! 😂
1
Successful-Ad-847Mar 27, 2026
+1
Our parents
1
pineapple192Mar 27, 2026
+1
tbf at the end of the last shut down Democrats basically rolled over to their mandate so why would Republicans expect anything less. Republicans expect Democrats to be spineless and they're usually right.
1
FjorgVanDerPlorgMar 27, 2026
+1
Every time they use a shutdown as a cudgel, the democrats cave.
Every. Single. Time.
Only one side cares if people starve or become homeless. So they know this will work again, because it always has and likely always will. Shumer and Jeffries fold like well oiled deck chairs.
1
Michael_G_BordinMar 27, 2026
+1
The thing is, this isn't a total government shutdown. This is just DHS funding. Democrats don't need to cave. The only people at risk are DHS employees. A nice explanation can be [found here](https://case.house.gov/government-shutdown/).
1
FjorgVanDerPlorgMar 27, 2026
+1
Yeah I get that but here's the thing, that's logical. Trump doesn't do logical, or rational, or sane for that matter. The words "abusive relationship with reality" fit perfectly.
For GOP shutdown stopped being their problem a long time ago. Now to them its just another button you press to own the libs. They will either cave, or it can go on for years until they all quit, Trump has ICE now. Trump never has to cave on this and right now he's just selectively paying the public facing part TSA, out of an ICE budget that's bigger than the US Marines.
Not to say I think they should cave, they should have shut down everything sooner and not budged an inch.
1
PancakesandcowsMar 27, 2026
+1
I thought last time, a few Democrats broke ranks to pass it, and the rest of the Democrats were pissed off at them?
1
TheSavouryRainMar 27, 2026
+1
Yet they have no problem filibustering anything and everything
1
Mysterious-Tie7039Mar 27, 2026
+1
Yup, including the Coast Guard.
1
burlycabinMar 27, 2026
+1
I'm in the maritime industry. The Coast Guard's partial shutdown is an extraordinary headache for us.
1
firemage22Mar 27, 2026
+1
which is why they should go back to the Treasury after we break up DHS
1
Just-the-ShaftMar 27, 2026
+1
CISA is also just trying to do its best while hemorrhaging talent
1
wildwildwasteMar 27, 2026
+1
It wasn't even an EO, because they always could have been doing it. Dude just text MarkWayne and said pay em.
1
ITrageGuyMar 27, 2026
+81
I'm so confused, didn't Trump just send ICE to the airports to clean things up? Whatever happened with that?
81
Thunderclone_1Mar 27, 2026
+1
They aren't trained as TSA agents, so they just clog up the lines for food
1
XibbyMar 27, 2026
+95
\> I'm so confused, didn't Trump just send ICE to the airports to clean things up? Whatever happened with that?
Since ICE doesn’t have any authority to do TSA’s job, literally cleaning up (picking up trash) was something they are doing.
95
Ampallang80Mar 27, 2026
+1
Nah only the national guard would do something productive outside their role when assigned a bs posting. This mfers just standing there
1
MatrixF6Mar 27, 2026
+1
ICE isn’t trained to do ANY of the TSA jobs…
X-ray, scanners, metal detectors, identifying stress factors, de-escalation (especially the last one).
1
djfudgebarMar 27, 2026
+1
So Trump could have just paid them whenever he wanted but used them as bargaining chips.... again?
1
AcanthisittaNo6653Mar 26, 2026
+289
Trump could have resolved this weeks ago, but he let it fester instead.
289
squiddlebiddlezMar 27, 2026
+119
I bring it up every time I can because it cannot be stated enough and people need to get his M.O. through their skulls—he bargains with YOUR suffering and he is willing to make you suffer to death if it means he thinks he will get his way.
Remember he had the GOP shoot down their own border bill so he could have something to campaign on aside from the fact that he is a convicted felon who was starting to steal and seemingly sell government secrets. A month later after that stunt, Laken Riley was killed and he got the exact outcome he needed to skirt past his criminal convictions back into the White House.
He will send young white people to their deaths if it gets him power. He damn sure doesn’t have a problem with wrecking your lives for whatever the f*** it is he’s trying to do now.
119
draelbsMar 27, 2026
+1
Project 2025 wants TSA privatized. (amongst other parts of the government.)
1
KoharagirlMar 26, 2026
+923
“Congress holds the purse strings” has become the punchline for a joke.
923
jayfeather31Mar 26, 2026
+294
Yep. It's pretty obvious just how much more powerful the executive is at this point when Congress doesn't do a damn thing to stop it.
Checks and balances are a joke at this point.
294
LiveChocolate8819Mar 27, 2026
+118
"Checks and balances" exist to defeat any proposed legislation/action deemed too left-wing by corporate interests.
118
jayfeather31Mar 27, 2026
+1
It's really difficult to argue against that, especially in light of our bourgeois democracy.
Honestly, when was the last time anything transformational from the left actually came through Congress? A weak Healthcare reform in 2010 that was literally a repackaged program the Republicans had in Massachusetts signed by Governor Romney?
1
Credit_SignalMar 27, 2026
+1
That's the real truth!
1
007meowMar 27, 2026
+21
I do wonder what kind of precedent is being set by this administration, and how a democrat could use it to their advantage.
Yes the GOP will REEEE as they always do, but is there any legal precedent being set?
21
j01101111shMar 27, 2026
+32
Not as long as we have this supreme court. They will bend over backwards for Trump but a Democrat would never get these same rulings.
32
Sigma_Function-1823Mar 27, 2026
+1
Yup
The precedent was set by the SCOTUS granting the current executive extra constitutional authority and privileges based on originalist motivated reasoning rather than evidenced legal precedent.
They, including the current SCOTUS conservative majority have no ability to understand even the basic cause and effect you just communicated so clearly.
Modern "conservatives" and unintended, unconsidered consequences are like water and wet so I suspect a great many of us are going to enjoy their predictable hypocritical whining and complaining while the damage they have caused is addressed.
Whatever a Dem. president does republicans will.claim they are victims( playing victim is their favorite thing), so who cares what they say or do at this point.
It's all about performative theater for them and really very little else.
Last time they tried this anti constitutional, anti representative democracy b.s. with the business plot they didn't get near the presidency for a long while after, so let's hope the orange fool doesn't exit before the full consequences of his criminality, stupidity and incompetence become undeniable,even to.his cult members.
Really its absolutely a good idea to completely ignore the arsonists objecting to the manner in which the fire they created is dealt with but yeah your not wrong at all.
1
hiigaranMar 27, 2026
+15
Only because half of the legislative are quislings who roll over and show their belly to the blowhard leading the executive.
At literally any point they could turn around and exert their power again but they don't want to either because they're scared or mewling sycophants.
15
Ordinary-Egg-56Mar 27, 2026
+1
no not congress. republicans haven’t done a damn thing to stop it. and of course they won’t, because this is what they want.
democratic legislators can’t push legislation through by themselves
1
MagnusPIMar 27, 2026
+36
>“Congress ~~holds the purse strings~~” has become the punchline for a joke.
FTFY. Though I don't know if it's so much "has become" as it is "turned themselves into".
36
toofastkindafuriousMar 27, 2026
+12
Just like the president can't unilaterally declare war
12
manondorfMar 27, 2026
+4
can, has, will again, who's gonna stop him
4
Rock-n-roll-KevinMar 26, 2026
+578
If he can, why did he wait?
578
Duane_Mar 26, 2026
+366
You can't gain leverage without threatening innocent lives, obviously.
366
HerkulezRokkafellerMar 27, 2026
+56
Art of the Steal
56
NotQuiteGoodEnougherMar 27, 2026
+11
Shart of a deal. That's the new Trump motto.
11
spazz720Mar 26, 2026
+92
He thought Dems would get the blame for not supporting the DHS funding bill.
92
Silvery_CricketMar 26, 2026
+66
Because he can see that no one likes ICE, and wants to use the financial suffering of TSA agents as leverage to turn people on democrats who won't agree to fund all of DHS at once. Both ICE and TSA fall under DHS' umbrella.
66
barimanlhsMar 27, 2026
+40
Its not like TSA are a well liked group either lol
They just happen to the be best worst option for a general level of stable everyone wants back
40
MudLOAMar 27, 2026
+38
As far as I know TSA aren’t killing innocent bystanders or kidnapping children for bait.
38
LateSoEarlyMar 27, 2026
+18
The way they’ve yelled at me for doing shit I’ve been yelled at not to do, or yelled at me for not doing shit I’ve been told to do before, you’d almost think that they want to kill innocent bystanders.
Obviously TSA isn’t a thousandth of a percent as bad as ICE, but Jesus Christ it’s seemed like some of them are really out to make your miserable flight even worse than it has to be.
18
Dizzy-Captain7422Mar 27, 2026
+11
Truly some of the saltiest people out there.
11
UnquestionabIeMar 27, 2026
+10
Because they're a do nothing 9/11 overreaction creation that has long since proven it isn't worth funding. They fail a large majority of their audits/tests and are the very definition of security theater and government overreach.
10
MudLOAMar 27, 2026
+5
As far as I know TSA aren’t killing innocent bystanders or kidnapping children for bait.
5
Late-Dingo-8567Mar 26, 2026
+37
really? because it was his leverage. Repeatedly this admin has put innocent people in harm's way to leverage funding discussions. they did the exact same thing w/ SNAP in November.
37
Stinky_FartfaceMar 27, 2026
+13
Because, like the narcissist he is, he couldn’t fathom a scenario that people would blame him and the GOP for the shutdown. He probably still doesn’t. I’m sure he has a long list of people and institutions to blame. But the fact is, most people want ICE to be reigned in. Deploying them to airports was a dumb idea that was just going to make things worse without any additional leverage for him. So someone told him he had run out of road on this issue and it was best to try to own the solution than claim defeat, so he enacted it as an executive order rather than admit that he was wrong and this is what everyone wanted all along.
13
TechnicalScheme385Mar 27, 2026
+9
This is what I've been posting to all the facebook groups that talk about this. We have seen trump misappropriate congressional funds from so many budgets, why can't he do that with DHS for TSA? ICE has enough money allocated to it, that it now has more money than the marines. SO WTF is wrong with this situation?
commentors in those FB groups have been spinning circles. I'm sure some congressional reps have been hearing this as well.
And now, trump does it. Which destroys trumps narrative.
9
bryan49Mar 27, 2026
+7
Because TSA/airports are the hostages that were being held for a ransom of more ICE funding
7
UrPissedConsumerMar 27, 2026
+4
According to the Constitution, he can't ... not that such matters anymore
4
Taurius2Mar 26, 2026
+195
DHS: "In 2 weeks!
*2 weeks later*
TSA: "I haven't received a check...:
DHS: "You took 1 day off. It's against the rule to take a day off during shutdown. So no paycheck for you."
195
WyevezMar 27, 2026
+1
And now you owe us $50,000
1
LabOwn9800Mar 27, 2026
+134
So let me get this straight. Trump had the power to fix this 40 days ago but used our suffering for political
Leverage?
134
Safe_Base312Mar 27, 2026
+62
It's the conservative way.
62
guttanzerMar 27, 2026
+1
To be fair, Trump also has no clue. He could ask someone, but he’s so damn “me” oriented it never occurs to him that there might be more to things.
1
aguynamedvMar 27, 2026
+1
> So let me get this straight. Trump used our suffering for political Leverage?
This has *always* been the case. Always.
1
AntoniaFauciMar 27, 2026
+1
GOP has voted it down 11 times already.
Most people don’t know because:
* louder GOP and rapist in chief lying and saying it’s the Dems’ fault
* our useless media never corrects their lies
* the Dems have the worst messaging
1
SghnDubhMar 27, 2026
+1
He's not fixing anything. He has no authority to order this. Congress must authorize the spending. That's why they're not getting paid.
1
BlueHDMIVMar 27, 2026
+1
Yup Trump is like a child, he hates Dems so much he was willing to shutdown part of the government to get his way. It’s crazy how all these people actually believe Dems are responsible for this, they offered 8 clean bills to fund them but Trump wants his precious personal military to get even more funds than they need. MAGA will drink anything Fox News says
1
Ok_Key_4731Mar 26, 2026
+142
All the GOP had to do was pass ONE of the 8 bills to fund TSA that were brought up in the past month. 🙄
142
AntoniaFauciMar 27, 2026
+1
As of yesterday, Republicans had voted down 11. Not sure if there was another today.
1
Mikethebest78Mar 26, 2026
+63
This was chaos that he caused right? Or are we talking about different chaos? I can't keep track anymore.
63
GlassworthMar 27, 2026
+17
Is there any chaos in America in 2026 that can’t be traced back to Trump?
17
Miserable_Pie_8337Mar 26, 2026
+70
So Trump could've done this a month ago but chose to let the people responsible for protecting our airports go without pay...
70
rj319stMar 27, 2026
+30
He thought it would hurt the Dems but discovered his poll numbers were plummeting.
30
papaHansMar 26, 2026
+103
He's going to make it look like he is the hero of this f*** up.
103
Pale-Factor-8574Mar 26, 2026
+69
Nobody believes anything he says anyway, except Maga.
69
Resident-Writing850Mar 26, 2026
+23
Yeah, he'll say he has a power he had all along and they think it's new.
He creates a problem to further absolve himself of jail time and blames Dems. They believe it.
He was elected fairly in 2024 yet crows about illegals voting in the same breath as how he won by. magats praise him.
magats are the dumbest people I've ever met.
23
gwsthMar 26, 2026
+8
Unfortunately, that's enough to let him retain control of the country.
8
Pale-Factor-8574Mar 26, 2026
+10
That was Elon Musk's fault. He openly bragged about vote tampering.
He isn't doing so hot these days. I wonder if he will turn on Maga now.
10
DevonGrMar 27, 2026
+6
I think Elon and Trump both have some mutually assured destruction in versions of the Epstein files they can roll out if ever need be.
6
UnfitToPrintMar 26, 2026
+29
Every time he does this shit I could repost the same Onion Headline: “President Heroically Solves Problem He Created”
29
MrFishAndLoavesMar 26, 2026
+4
Republican playbook.
4
alwaysmyfaultMar 27, 2026
+4
His idiot supporters will eat it up too.
"See, Trump committed to funding the TSA cuz the evil Librulz won't do it! He's for the people!"
4
spazz720Mar 26, 2026
+4
He actually just face the Dems a huge win
4
GMEN999Mar 27, 2026
+21
He should pay with the Billions he’s already grifted from the American people.
21
misdirected_assholeMar 26, 2026
+43
1)Start fire
2)Blame firefighters for not having fire put out yet
3)Put out fire, claim to be hero
43
TralphazoorMar 26, 2026
+33
3) claim to have put out the fire so his brain dead cult members believe what they’re told, not what they see with their own eyes.
4) fire still burns out of control
33
breakevencloudMar 26, 2026
+19
I’m not sure that’s how that works, but, then again, I’m also not sure of very much anymore.
19
brpajenseMar 27, 2026
+16
Seems like Trump is being a little too obvious in screwing over TSA workers.
Is privatizing or abolishing the TSA part of Project 2025 or something? Because Trump is going beyond holding TSA agents and travelers hostage to get the SAVE Act passed, and is actually trying to break the TSA by driving everyone to quit through mismamagement and then saying that Trump Airport and C***** Security can do it better but it needs an exclusive no-bid contract to do it.
16
potkettleracismMar 27, 2026
+23
Yes, privatizing TSA is part of Project 2025.
Edit: page 134, bullet point 4.
23
No-Personality1840Mar 27, 2026
+5
Yes, that’s part of Project 2025 privatization.
5
Corey307Mar 27, 2026
+1
It has its own full page in the project 2025 manual. There are billions to be made by private security contractors if the TSA is privatized. No they will not get it done cheaper but some billionaires will make extra billions..
1
ma-sadieJMar 27, 2026
+14
From what fund?
14
SwitchbackHellMar 27, 2026
+5
DHS got like $200 billion from the BBB last year.
5
Ok-Lets-Talk-It-OutMar 26, 2026
+62
Here is the dipshits full tweet, having the usual lies and dumbass claims:
*The Radical Left Democrats, and their “Leader,” Cryin’ Chuck Schumer, have made it very clear where they stand, and that is, ON THE SIDE OF CRIMINAL ILLEGAL ALIENS, AND NOT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. They are refusing to fund Immigration Enforcement unless the Republicans agree to their Open Border Policies, which will never, ever happen again. They almost destroyed our Country, allowing 25 Million People to enter from Prisons, Mental Institutions, and Insane Asylums, those that are Drug Dealers, and thousands of Murderers, many of whom killed more than one person. Because the Democrats have recklessly created a true National Crisis, I am using my authorities under the Law to protect our Great Country, as I always will do! Therefore, I am going to sign an Order instructing the Secretary of Homeland Security, Markwayne Mullin, to immediately pay our TSA Agents in order to address this Emergency Situation, and to quickly stop the Democrat Chaos at the Airports. It is not an easy thing to do, but I am going to do it! I want to thank our hardworking TSA Agents and also, ICE, for the incredible help they have given us at the Airports. I will not allow the Radical Left Democrats to hold our Country hostage any longer. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP*
62
Gonzomi313Mar 26, 2026
+75
My god this man is not only a liar but beyond unhinged. I can see why his MAGA base can relate to him.
75
MrFishAndLoavesMar 26, 2026
+22
Shit reads like it’s triggering the programming that Fox News imbeds.
22
D3athRiderMar 26, 2026
+41
> Mental Institutions, and Insane Asylums
Mental Institutions **AND** Insane Asylums?!? Golly gee, Beaver, that does sound bad!! 😱
41
SympathyCalmMar 27, 2026
+36
Continue to be convinced that he believes asylum seekers are people from asylums looking for one in the US
Every single time he talks about this he mentions it
36
djbtech1978Mar 27, 2026
+5
Don't forget the clan from Alpha Centauri B who stole all the kittens in America last year to fuel their spacecraft
5
BromodrosisMar 26, 2026
+12
Who knew it was just as easy as getting Markwayne to cut a few checks!
Man, this president stuff seems super easy.
12
smurkederp25Mar 27, 2026
+1
"Trump admits he has been holding the safety and security of Americans hostage so he can rig the midterms"
1
Furd__TurgesonMar 27, 2026
+33
Roses are red
Violets are blue
Break free little clot
Do what you do
/obviously not directed to any individual in particular
33
GlimdropMar 26, 2026
+27
If Trump really does pay TSA with Homeland Security money, that works for me. Homeland Security got $190 billion in the so-called “big beautiful bill” last year, so they should be able to afford it. Good use for that money actually. And Dems should then do everything they can to stop them from getting reimbursed for it.
27
GotenRockoMar 27, 2026
+11
Yep let the ICE money go to TSA, don't give TSA more money so ICE essentially gets a funding cut.
11
CrazyhatesMar 27, 2026
+11
This MF really just taco on his own threat?
11
Boundish91Mar 27, 2026
+8
To me the fact that you have a system which allows you to force people to work and not pay them is wild.
That's slavery.
8
jbomber81Mar 27, 2026
+1
The Dems have introduced legislation to fund TSA as a standalone bill multiple times
1
Frequent-Client1508Mar 27, 2026
+9
TACO trump said nothing gets done until the cheat election act.
9
untoldmillionsMar 27, 2026
+5
someone he's connected to must have had to stand in a long TSA line last night or this morning
5
AngrySumBitchMar 27, 2026
+8
Let me solve a problem that I created. Is that what happened?
8
SghnDubhMar 27, 2026
+1
He's not solving anything. He has no authority to order this. Congress must authorize the spending. That's why they're not getting paid.
1
brute-forcedMar 27, 2026
+8
This f****** idiot could’ve done this from day zero? And he refused because politics.
8
hifumiyo1Mar 27, 2026
+5
The DHS administrators have been the one not paying TSA. Trump trying to get credit for extinguishing a fire his people started.
5
Gold_Matter_609Mar 27, 2026
+7
Wow. So he was just holding out trying to make the Dems look bad. Another dumb move.
7
AThousandBloodhoundsMar 27, 2026
+1
Classic Trump. Create a problem then claim victory by resetting back to the way it was.
1
althor2424Mar 27, 2026
+1
Too bad his EO is like 90% of his others: invalid and unconstitutional
1
Rogue_AI_ConstructMar 27, 2026
+1
Well he has no constitutional authority to do so.
1
DeeRent88Mar 27, 2026
+1
If this happens watch all his supporters and the non political people say they’re getting paid thanks to Trump and no thanks to the democrats even though there had been multiple no strings attached bills introduced that had nothing on them other than to get the TSA agents paid and he had them all rejected.
1
CH49FEMar 26, 2026
+15
Didn’t he just previously divert money to ICE under other funding streams at the expense of other DHS employees, like TSA? This was and always has been a problem created by himself. He wanted to make sure his personal, underqualified, trigger happy army would remain loyal so ensured they got paid.
15
Aware-Chipmunk4344Mar 27, 2026
+7
Illegal. Dictatorship.
7
JackprizeMar 27, 2026
+6
You mean, he could’ve just done that at any time. Well I’ll be damned.
6
JackprizeMar 27, 2026
+3
The power was inside you the whole time…
3
Slanted_wordsMar 27, 2026
+1
Pretty he sure presidents don’t control the countries purse strings
1
S0biepanMar 27, 2026
+1
That this MF caused
1
LevelAd1126Mar 27, 2026
+1
Oh wow. Looks like the only thing stopping the paychecks all along was Trump himself.
1
cinemachickMar 27, 2026
+4
Can y'all pay the Coast Guard too? You don't want the person rescuing you from your yacht to be hungry!
4
BalanceOrganic7735Mar 27, 2026
+4
TACO Trump did what?
4
KakistocratForLifeMar 27, 2026
+4
Which he could have done day 1
4
Goge97Mar 27, 2026
+4
Create a problem, generate chaos, sit back and enjoy the suffering, then ride in on a white horse and fix it,!
The Trump Classic
4
Lysol3435Mar 27, 2026
+5
So if this was an option, he left them to languish for 40 days for fun?
5
mapoftasmaniaMar 27, 2026
+1
So he refused to sign a deal that would fund the TSA, so that he could try to look like a hero by funding the TSA?
1
jacscarlitMar 27, 2026
+1
One wildly illegal and two where is the money coming from? Just curious if he's getting the money from the correct source or not. I don't trust the accounting in this WH at all. I bet they already spent the tariffs they're supposed to pay back.
1
tani0521Mar 27, 2026
+1
It’s like asking a kid to clean his room every day for a month and the last day of the month he finally does it and expects you to be ecstatic.
1
Nowhereman50Mar 27, 2026
+1
>>claims there is no problem
>>blames someone for the problem
>>cuts funding to avoid the problem
>>slap dashes some solution with zero regard for cost or pain it causes
Have I summed up his entire presidency well enough?
1
sarcasticdick82Mar 27, 2026
+1
If that is all he had to do, why did he wait
1
johnn48Mar 27, 2026
+1
>to immediately pay our TSA Agents in order to address this Emergency Situation, and to quickly stop the Democrat Chaos at the Airports,” he added.
If he has the power to direct Markwayne Mullin to pay the TSA agents, why now rather than before so many agents quit. He stopped Thune from passing a compromise that would have allowed them to be paid separately from ICE, but he said no deals with the Democrats according to (R-LA) John Kennedy.
1
P2PdancerMar 26, 2026
+4
I’ll believe it when I see it.
4
Minimum_Run_890Mar 27, 2026
+3
So, he could have done this any time, saved a lot of pain and heartache for employees and danger to air travellers.
3
virgil_of_the_brooksMar 27, 2026
+3
So another instance where the orange shows seditious behavior by betraying the American people (whom he represents) by using his own government employees paychecks as leverage for his fascist agenda? Icing on the cake: he could’ve paid them the entire time and this whole shut down was for a nothing burger. Please how many more examples of treason does Congress need to see before action is taken? Arrest the orange, all of his goons, and any rep who supports his fascist agenda now before it’s too late
3
RoutineCowManMar 27, 2026
+4
Take it out of the ICE budget
4
theartistfnaSDF1Mar 27, 2026
+5
Holy f*** they need a union. Trump once again has to fix something HE broke.
5
illbejohnbrownMar 27, 2026
+5
"Trump says..."
That's the cue to stop reading
5
Tart-Pomgranate5743Mar 27, 2026
+4
TACO Thursday… and cue Trump touting how he’s “solved the problem Democrats created”.
4
alpar001Mar 27, 2026
+4
Proving he could’ve ended this months ago…
4
Popular-Web-3739Mar 27, 2026
+1
Good. He should cave. The EO isn't the right way to do this, but his trying to demand that their pay would only come if both full DHS funding and the SAVE Act were included has fallen flat on it's face. The TSA agents deserve pay and Republicans wouldn't pass a stand alone funding bill. Trump has to cave because people are pissed about the short staffing at airports and TSA has lost hundreds of agents due to no pay.
1
SheriffWyattDerpMar 27, 2026
+1
Okay, that was always allowed!
1
doublelist87Mar 27, 2026
+1
Donald you created this mess
1
TsuDhoNimh2Mar 27, 2026
+1
Pay them? With what money?
1
negativegh0stwrit3rMar 27, 2026
+1
This is even more evidence for No Kings protestors: The best way to make change is to block transit. Block airports. Block highways. Ted Cruz will love it :beachEmoji
1
IflydryandslyMar 27, 2026
+1
Create a problem, blame the dems, then try to come across as the saviour
1
gdghhfdffrfMar 26, 2026
+9
what about everybody else who is working for free?
9
korkythecat333Mar 26, 2026
+3
I would want cash up front.
3
Acadia02Mar 27, 2026
+3
Wow what a big strong man
3
ZebraComplex4353Mar 27, 2026
+3
No mention at all about retroactive payments
3
Tofurkey_TomMar 27, 2026
+3
So that means they have to sell some of the luxury jets with master bedroom suite that Noem used?
3
aflyingsquanchMar 27, 2026
+1
Blatantly illegal and unconstitutional.
1
PapasamabhangaMar 27, 2026
+1
Why is he so stupid? Why is Congress?
Who pays for things in this country is basic civics.
1
bkcarp00Mar 27, 2026
+1
With what money? Made up trump bucks?
1
MonkeyWrench1973Mar 27, 2026
+1
TACO strikes again...
1
BankshotMcGMar 27, 2026
+1
Why is it every time I'm about to finally use up all my travel card points this f****** guy manages to shut down the airports
1
PluginAlongMar 27, 2026
+1
This won't magically fix the problem, sure people might not be calling in "sick", but over 400 TSA agent's have quit. I doubt those people will just come right back.
1
Tr33Bl00dMar 27, 2026
+1
So it didn’t have to be like this? He could have done it day 1? This was just a ploy?
1
taffyownerMar 27, 2026
+1
He can’t do this period
1
48W451Mar 27, 2026
+1
Could have been avoided weeks ago by agreeing to the democrats idea of a carve out of TSA for funding and deal with the rest as a separate package.A deliberate action by Trump to make it sound like he's solving the 'Democrat problem'. Another bone cast to his MAGA cultist base as their great savior against 'Democratic extremism'.
198 Comments