I thought Trump said the US sunk all of Iran’s water boats.
623
Niner_oscar_76 days ago
+375
He was told there wouldn't be fact checking.
375
Reasonable-Gas56256 days ago
+90
For those that don't get the reference, that's what Vance said in his debate with Tim Walz after being fact checked by the hosts.
>The rules were you guys weren't going to fact check.
> - JD Vance
90
ParisGreenGretsch5 days ago
+41
It's amazing the stupid shit these people can say out loud without the slightest blowback from supporters. They need a shepherd.
41
Kolbin8tor5 days ago
+24
Their supporters are, objectively, some of the dumbest motherfuckers to have ever lived.
24
michoudi4 days ago
+2
Don’t d******* the number of people who know better, they are just evil.
2
watchitbend5 days ago
+14
It is f****** unfathomable that these words were even uttered. It shows everyone that there is no good faith at play. These people are diabolical and shouldn't be anywhere near power, and they got elected.
14
Creaturesteachers5 days ago
+5
As a non American, I sort of want to fact check what you’ve said because it sounds unbelievable. These clown con men being in power is crazy.
5
Arboreal_Web5 days ago
+3
It did happen. And it was still unbelievable.
3
Reasonable-Gas56255 days ago
+2
>I sort of want to fact check what you’ve said
No no, I was told there would be no fact checking!
Seriously: https://xcancel.com/HQNewsNow/status/1841291195919606165
2
too-left-feet5 days ago
+1
I wonder how JD is doing after his “ the people of Hungary don’t take me seriously, the people of Iran don’t take me seriously” tour
1
SlumdogSkillionaire5 days ago
+1
He could always fall back on his faith, except the Pope doesn't take him seriously either.
1
quats5556 days ago
+26
He’s a narcissist; he believes everything he says is the gospel truth just because he said it. I don’t know if, somewhere buried underneath the narcissistic ego and rage, he might actually realize he’s lying or not.
26
solblurgh6 days ago
+6
He literally does the "STOP THE COUNT" everywhere, not only during election
6
Ok_Astronomer_86676 days ago
+28
He also said their air defenses were completely destroyed, and then they shot down one our jets a few days later.
28
Possible-Pea26586 days ago
+28
he also said Iran wants him to be supreme leader. Also said there was a ceasefire. He says many things, none of which are true
28
marshalist6 days ago
+5
And president of Venezuela. He will be busy that's for sure.
5
im_thatoneguy5 days ago
+4
That one was actually fake news. He was in context clearly doing one of his stupid little one man plays acting out a hypothetical conversation within Iranian leadership.
4
Competitive_Time_6046 days ago
+5
He didn't account for Davy Jones' locker.
5
1877KlownsForKids6 days ago
+1
And Davy Jones is super pissed ever since SpongeBob defeated him
1
RiPPeR694206 days ago
+13
The US sunk Iran's blue water Navy. These fast attack boats are speedboats armed with a mix of torpedoes, rockets, machine guns, suicide charges and occasionally anti-ship missiles. More like Ukrainian drone boats, but manned.
13
Halbaras5 days ago
+3
Iran has USVs as well, one of the tankers that was previously attacked in this war was struck by one. Some of the fast attack boats can apparently be operated as drones as well.
Part of the reason the US is begging allies to come die for Israel in the strait for them is they're genuinely worried about having warships get damaged. Ukraine crippling the black sea fleet from shore wasn't entirely down to Russian incompetence.
3
RiPPeR694205 days ago
+2
To be fair, the US Navy learned a hard lesson from the USS Cole and has been actively preparing for Iranian FIACs for years. I'm not discounting the threat, but it's significantly less of a threat to the US Navy because the US Navy is significantly better equipped, better maintained and better trained to deal with this sort of threat. But there aren't too many scenarios where the US doesn't lose a ship or two, though it would probably be LCSs as opposed to Burkes. Which would be acceptable from a military standpoint (as it stands with this idiotic endeavor), but a political disaster.
2
rememberall6 days ago
+3
Yeah... But now they have to worry about the land boats
3
joelfarris5 days ago
+1
Hey! You leave my auntie's Cadillac out of this!
1
Sethypoooooooooo6 days ago
+8
I think they were referring to Iran's ship's. They also have hundreds of small boats with weapons mounted on them.
I remember them following us around when I was on deployment in 2017, you'd look out and have 20 small boats following you anywhere you went.
8
tomdon886 days ago
+9
I guess he’s talking about the non-water boats.
9
s0da_pressed6 days ago
+8
we must ELIMINATE the RADICAL BANANA BOATS and their crusade on “SPF”. Praise be to Allah!!!!
8
gsomething6 days ago
+4
Mountain boats
4
burtgummer456 days ago
+3
Not the small boats. Iran has a ton of them.
https://www.listnook.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2Fp2rn690s4sg61.jpg
3
Green_L3af6 days ago
+1
Not the fast ones apparently
1
bigtime11586 days ago
+1
It's not the water boats. These are Iran's fire boats now. Next he will defeat the earth boats.
1
philslist5 days ago
+1
They use jet skis and shit
1
asicarii5 days ago
+1
The navy sent him photos of them shooting missiles at rubber ducks because it’s just easier to get him back to his nursing home.
1
xJayce775 days ago
+1
Came looking for this comment, happy to not be disappointed (in Listnookor commentors at least).
1
Likes_You_Prone5 days ago
+1
As opposed to... Gravy boats?
1
SmartTrender5 days ago
+1
That was yesterday’s lie haha
1
NegativeCreeq6 days ago
+468
Trump will soon declare hes going after the one piece.
468
doomgoblin6 days ago
+47
He’s no Joy Boy.
47
SHADOWSTRIKE16 days ago
+31
He’s basically Season 1 Helmeppo
31
tech_consultant5 days ago
+17
Charlos unfortunately. Way more influential than Helmeppo.
17
ArchDucky5 days ago
+4
Hes Wapol.
4
fox_tamere5 days ago
+4
He's live action Wapol too.
4
rasticus6 days ago
+14
His sorry ass wouldn’t even make it to the Grand Line.
14
Dittopotamus6 days ago
+29
Wait what? He’s going after swimwear? Where does it end?!
29
espinaustin6 days ago
+36
It ends at the grand line.
36
Abrooch6 days ago
+20
It ends at the tan line.
20
BrianWantsTruth6 days ago
+8
I wonder how many times his aides have tried explaining that Pandora isn’t real.
8
jardex225 days ago
+2
Which one? The one with vaults that need to be liberated, or the one with the blue people that need a taste of freedom.
2
epanek6 days ago
+3
Trump lives each day as if tomorrow isn’t coming and yesterday can be lied about. Every day I think he wakes up and asks “how can I spin this about me.?” He has no curiosity. Each person is a transaction to obtain something.
3
jradio5 days ago
+2
The hair piece
2
ScientificAnarchist5 days ago
+1
God I just had a vision of him going and finding that chest the author dropped in the ocean with the us navy and ruining the end for everyone because he can’t let anyone have anything and we’re in hell
1
AnastasiaWookieTits6 days ago
+242
He probably thinks that was some great strategic insight on his part.
242
ygkg6 days ago
+24
Probably right. He doesn't seem to understand what a ceasefire is either.
24
[deleted]6 days ago
+11
[deleted]
11
ygkg6 days ago
+5
So kind of a ceasefiringback... I think that's how it would have to be written since it's clear that none of trump's ideas will ever ceasebackfiring.
5
Flyfisher585 days ago
+4
Sounds like Israel
4
sthlmsoul6 days ago
+8
DJT: Let's use US Navy and other US military assets to accomplish the goals of Iran!
Also while at it, let's insult and demean our long-standing allies around the world!
8
Schlonzig6 days ago
+3
He just revealed what they are afraid of, huh?
3
bijelo1236 days ago
+101
"Iran is finished. I will now be charging for passage.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER"
101
ddrober20036 days ago
+39
Don't worry though the money won't be going to the US. It will go to the "Peace Board" that Trump has sole access to. Though the US will pay for manning the passage.
39
406highlander6 days ago
+9
Is the Peace Board's bank account owned by a shell company in the Cayman Islands?
9
papaflush6 days ago
+9
Qatar
9
winterwonderland19056 days ago
+46
This guy is so far out of his depth. If This is what Americans voted for, everyone should just put them in the special needs corner for the next 2 years. JDVamce - listen to your Pope.
46
thisisa_fake_account6 days ago
+20
You wouldn't believe what happened the last time JD Vance met the Pope.
20
UniqueIndividual35796 days ago
+5
The pope died of embarrassment.
5
Calimariae6 days ago
+3
Killed Orban's career also.
3
Groentekroket6 days ago
+7
I can’t understand that Americans read these news letters and don’t do anything about it. In lots of other places they would protest for days but they are too lazy to come out of the couch.
7
No_Gur11136 days ago
+14
I think we need be fair to Americans for not protesting more ardently/violently. View their lives the way they actually live them, not how they’re portrayed on TV.
Many Americans are wage slaves who are one paycheck away from financial disaster. 1/3 would find it difficult to cover an unexpected $400 expense. They pay so much for health insurance and could still end up with a co-pay that may leave them bankrupt. Missing work could actually be life and death for them if they can’t pay for their health insurance and get sick.
And last but not least, America has a gun problem not experienced in other parts of the developed world. They have a policing problem. They have an ICE problem. A protest there ≠ a protest in many places.
I’m Canadian and I have no issue protesting here, but I’m not too sure I’d be chomping at the bit to protest if I lived in the USA. Too many twitchy fingers on hair triggers.
14
SvedishFish6 days ago
+2
We're not on the couch, we are working, because if you skip work to protest, youll get fired. the iob market is tough so there's no guarantee youll find something comparable. And in America there's mostly no social safety net, so your kids can go hungry. And your health insurance is tied to your job, so you lose medical care too. Need to take your kid to the doctor? Lol without insurance you don't *have* a doctor. If you get arrested while protesting, it can make you un-hirable. The risk to your family is just too much, especially knowing that your protest will accomplish jack shit because no one with power is going to do a damn thing about it anyway.
Until there is a real tangible risk to your family that outweighs the risks of protesting - when you can no longer afford to feed your kids, or when they're physically in danger - most people are going to keep their heads down and go to work.
Edit: also important to add, there's tons of protests here. There's always someone protesting something, and anti-trump protests regularly. But the idea of protesting for days on end is impossible. There's no way to sustain that momentum when there's no end in sight.
2
lzrs26 days ago
+31
Somehow Palpatine returned
31
TheSamurabbi5 days ago
+3
Temu Palpatine
3
bier00t5 days ago
+1
Comparing him with Palpatine is like comparing mosquito to the swarm of wasps
1
Jon_Mace6 days ago
+50
How is it that no one is doing anything about this man’s incompetence. He says one thing and changes his mind the next day.
50
Completely-Lost96 days ago
+41
Anyone with any power to do something is on the inside getting rich off stock market manipulation
41
MidRoundOldFashioned6 days ago
+13
Remember in school how watergate was portrayed?
This won’t be in textbooks. They’ll have enough money to make sure this corruption doesn’t get exposed to millions of school children.
13
LonelyNovel19855 days ago
+1
Can you guess which currently incarcerated Epstein-associate had a father who worked in the publishing of educational textbooks?
1
Anxious-Bite-2996 days ago
+6
the cruel reality might actually be, that this whole shitshows only reason is to be able to manipulate the markets. if u think if it that way, the iran war is perfect! he makes billions
6
Feynnehrun6 days ago
+2
Because the people with the power to stop this are getting disgustingly rich from it.
2
Bughunter90016 days ago
+2
He doesn't change his mind, that implies some kind of consideration, and an ability to retain information.. He doesn't have permanence of thought, he merely shits out a series of disconnected sentences
He doesn't hold opinions that can be repeated by asking the same deterministic question, he's like a slow fleshy LLM
2
SpareBee34426 days ago
+11
He should try eliminating inflation back home.
11
asdhjasdhlkjashdhgf6 days ago
+5
are speed boats inflatable?
5
fiftyfivepercentoff6 days ago
+8
Release the Epstein files !
8
NewEnglandViclas6 days ago
+12
Tommorow:s headline "Why won't anyone help the US destroy Iranian 'fast-attack' ships, why is NATO turning its back on us?"
The Art of the Deal Ladies and Gentlemen
12
redredgreengreen16 days ago
+15
Fast attack ships he claimed were all sunk 3 days ago
15
shatteredmatt6 days ago
+11
He knows the Iranians will attack the US Navy with drones right and not “fast attack ships”?
11
Calimariae6 days ago
+7
Maybe Iran takes a page out of Ukraine's book and turns those boats into sea drones.
7
_hockenberry5 days ago
+4
So the orange weirdo is going to put navy ships in range of iran territory/small boats? This sounds like a real good idea. Prepare the body bags.
4
qawsedrf125 days ago
+3
I thought he eliminated all of their "water boats" ?
3
Tigereyesxx5 days ago
+4
He said he had already eliminated their Navy?…
4
DoctorLudnik_7176 days ago
+9
THEY'RE NOT GOING TO USE SHIPS YOU F****** IMBECILE.
9
Twiggyhiggle6 days ago
+5
I was just thinking- what about the drones. They can just launch drone swarms.
5
DrakyulMihawk6 days ago
+6
Bwahahahaha..
All I hear is "more tax payer's money will be drained"
6
metallicadefender6 days ago
+8
Better hope Iran doesnt have Ukrainian level Drone systems.
Remember when a country with no Navy destroyed Russias navy?
8
Sifaka6126 days ago
+8
What ships? I thought US destroyed their navy.
8
ohst8buxcp76 days ago
+2
I have a boat in my backyard, is that a navy?
2
solidgoldrocketpants6 days ago
+4
What's a fast-attack ship?
"Anything we like."
4
BritishAnimator6 days ago
+5
Hey, anybody thought of water drones? HELLO? This is Iran, they make advanced drones. Sea drones are a thing. Anybody? Trump? Mr Navy? Nope....nobody thought of that. Ok.
5
burtgummer456 days ago
+7
Soooo many comments that don't know what they f*** they are talking about. These are the fast attack boats Iran has. They hid them in tunnels and warehouses. They were not "sunk" because they probably weren't even in the water and aren't on any target list.
https://www.listnook.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2Fp2rn690s4sg61.jpg
7
BRUTAL_ANAL_SMASHING6 days ago
+3
The same bullshit they’ve used forever.
Have a family friend, retired navy. Told me all the time about how when they would pass through the strait Iran would send these ships out.. they’d run em over if they got in the way back then.
They’re hardly special military boats, just some extra stuff on the hulls.. bigger motor and some guns.. boom “fast ship”
3
Bored20015 days ago
+2
They're not going to take out a destroyer, but they drop mines well enough.
2
JordanRS19806 days ago
+2
Wouldn't drones be more effective, regardless?
2
HarEr896 days ago
+2
The stock markets don't care and expect another round of talks in the coming days.
2
CaroCogitatus6 days ago
+2
Trump says a lot of shit. Trump makes idle threats every damn day. Can we please dispense with these headlines?
u/reuters, I expect better from you.
2
nowyuseeme6 days ago
+2
But he's destroyed then he said and won?
Dedicated and decimated without mercy.
How can fast attack ships still be in Iran's control?
How strange.
2
Mainetaco6 days ago
+2
Buuuuut they already ElImINaTed tHeM..
2
Strange_Drive_65986 days ago
+2
Not obliterated?
2
Grave_Knight5 days ago
+2
I'm gonna assume these fast attack ships will be unarmed save for nets they drag behind them. Just like the ones near Venzeula.
2
sirhackenslash5 days ago
+2
The fast attack ships from their navy that we completely obliterated twice? Damn, that's crazy.
2
jazir555 days ago
+2
>using the same **system of kill**
Dawg just named a new anime
2
GeneralCommand44595 days ago
+2
I’m so exhausted with this that I’ve either forgotten what this war is about or no one knows. Which is it?
2
wicket1465 days ago
+2
This idiot is about to get more Americans killed and he doesn’t care.
2
Rockeye75 days ago
+2
Did he not already say all of Irans Navy was at the bottom of the sea.
2
DrStrangelove20255 days ago
+2
Ah, yes, the vessels you put in harm's way for no reason will defend themselves. Is there a single commander out there dealing with this that's thinking, "Hell yeah! Crusades and Armageddon baby! Time to field test this shit!"
2
Kiiaru5 days ago
+2
The ones trump deliberately chose NOT to strike months ago because they wouldn't be an issue?
2
bighugebaby6 days ago
+4
RIP 2 week truce. We hardly knew ye.
4
jockfist50006 days ago
+4
Never seen winning like this before!
4
NachHymnen6 days ago
+4
80% of iran military navy is made of small fast attack boats equiped with anti-ship missiles.
But he said he destroyed all their navy....
4
Fearless_Push_42276 days ago
+2
Aren't there 6 thousand of them, and US ships have to stay far away for safe engagement?
2
bradland6 days ago
+3
Yes, there are many of them, and yes, US Navy ships use distance as a part of their defense, but this strategy is not unknown to the US military.
In 2002, the US participated in the Millennium Challenge. In that exercise, the US forces were the Blue Team, with the Red Team representing opposing forces. In that exercise, a retired USMC Lt. Gen. Paul Van Riper (yep, that's a real name) used swarm tactics to overwhelm and defeat a US Carrier Battle Group. The Red Team used small, fast-boats laden with explosives simultaneously with cruise missiles.
Within a few minutes, the Red Team had sunk 19 ships, including a carrier. The event led to significant controversy, with Van Riper ultimately walking out on the exercise after a forced reset and a change of rules that favored the Blue Team. Pretty much bullshit.
However, it's been more than 20 years since then, and fast-boat tactics weren't new at the time Van Riper used them. Fast-boat swarm tactics go way back. Iran bought some of their earliest fast-boats from Sweden in the 1980s.
What Van Riper did was demonstrate the clear limit of contemporary AEGIS tracking systems. Those limits are not the same today, but using small, c**** boats to overwhelm billions of dollars worth of advanced naval technology is an S-tier asymmetric warfare strategy.
In the intervening years, that exercise was reviewed by the entirety of the US military leadership who weren't so close to the specific exercise, and were therefore more willing to recognize the defeat and the urgent need for counter-measures
The USN has added specific counter-measures to their layered defense strategy. Advancements in directed-energy weapons are a major factor in reducing the asymmetry of swarm tactics. Laser and HPM weapons cost very little to fire, because the consumable is primarily energy.
They've also developed much lower cost traditional weapons like counter-force drone swarms and interceptors. This helps avoid the problem of using a $4M missile to defeat a $50k threat.
Arleigh Burke destroyers now have HELIOS, and smaller boats have ODIN. HPM is still in development, but should be on the water in 2026. Interceptor drones are in active use, and kinetic interceptor drones are mid-rollout.
Joint Maritime Operations are also playing a big role. There are a *lot* of A-10 enthusiasts, so you've likely heard about this already, but the Navy is working together with the Air Force to deploy A-10 patrols in the area. The A-10 has a very effective canon onboard, as well as a new laser guided variant of old school rocket pods. This combo provides a relatively inexpensive response to Iranian swarm tactics.
It's worth pointing out though that the A-10 cannot operate from a carrier. Without US Air Force bases in the region, we would not have this option. The Trump administration appears to be speed-running a strategy that is very likely to dramatically reduce the number of bases we have around the world. Just f****** brilliant.
3
skywalkerRCP6 days ago
+2
Thought they had no Navy and were obliterated?
2
HeatWaveToTheCrowd6 days ago
+2
Same fast-attack boats that have been totally obliterated already?
2
NewSanDiegean6 days ago
+1
I’m sure 98.2 is a number he just made up
1
[deleted]6 days ago
+1
[removed]
1
isthereadrwho6 days ago
+1
Considering if they're that close they probably have explosives , I'm going to go with one way or the other those boats will not exist for long. The question is how many other boats are they going to take with them.
1
Jouglet6 days ago
+1
FIFA peace prize w*****.
1
tpatmaho6 days ago
+1
and we’re gonna build a wall and make mexico pay for it.
1
Cloudhead_Denny6 days ago
+1
That's uhm...that's war isn't it? Enemy moves units too close to your units, kill enemy right? Jesus this guy is a dullard.
1
seancbo6 days ago
+1
oh good, for a minute I thought they would just wave at them
1
30MINUTETWEEZER6 days ago
+1
So does that mean they won't?
1
aa20516 days ago
+1
As opposed to… waving at them?
1
ProfessorDerp226 days ago
+1
I’d be more worried about sea-drones.
1
chilladipa6 days ago
+1
What about drones and ballistic missiles, fired from the coast?
1
rruusu6 days ago
+1
So far we have seen "fast-attack ships," "big boats of oil," and ships that "may bunk into one of their sea mines." His vocabulary is getting more and more garbled by the day.
1
nomoreusernamersleft6 days ago
+1
I thought all those ships / boats have been eliminated
1
Hoopy_Dunkalot6 days ago
+1
But he said they had no navy.
1
Johnny-Unitas6 days ago
+1
Does he think stating the obvious makes him sound smart?
1
TwoTalentedBastidz6 days ago
+1
Only a matter of time before US racks up more senseless deaths when Iran starts attacking the troops occupying the strait.
1
Orpa__6 days ago
+1
I keep hearing about these small fast attack boats that are supposedly not a problem
1
PapaCaqu6 days ago
+1
The same fast attack ships that have all been sunk?
1
ux3l5 days ago
+1
Well, the ceasefire ended already before they met to negotiate, either because Israel didn't stop bombing Lebanon/Hezbollah or because Iran didn't lift the blockage, depending on which side you ask.
1
Ship_fan5 days ago
+1
doesn't Iran have drones though?
what's his plan once the US navy ships start getting hit by drones?
1
funderfulfellow5 days ago
+1
Iran should do another blockade on the US blockade of the Iranian blockade. A blockadeception.
1
AdHopeful38015 days ago
+1
Thes are ships from the same navy he "obliterated" last week?
1
judasmachine5 days ago
+1
I mean... Isn't that standard operating procedure for a warship?
1
Elegant-Waltz6955 days ago
+1
Trump said all Iran’s ships have been destroyed.
1
yamilonewolf5 days ago
+1
Didn't he say he sunk all their 'water ships' like a week or so ago? what boats are they attackign with \*rolls eyes\*
1
mbod5 days ago
+1
Why's my portfolio green? Do people just not give a shit what he says anymore?
1
ThatsABingoJa5 days ago
+1
Thought they had no navy?
1
milwaukee_citizen5 days ago
+1
Do words mean anything?
1
Md6935 days ago
+1
I thought they didn’t have a. Navy
1
BusterStarfish5 days ago
+1
Seems like that kind of goes without saying? Not that I’m in favor of this ignorant dipshit war. But, yeah, if a fast attack boat approaches our sailors they should eliminate it. Why is this a conversation?
1
Kreiri5 days ago
+1
They don't need ships to sink US ships. They have drones.
1
philneal335 days ago
+1
Are all the navy on drugs? all of the iranian navy has been sunk, bigly obliterated..
HAS IT NOT?
1
yubnubster5 days ago
+1
I assumed they would be allowed to get up close and personal enough to kiss anchors. How surprising.
1
shibaninja5 days ago
+1
Don Tzu say, we let you run blockade because blockade was figure of speech, not actual ture true words.
1
lepetitnuco5 days ago
+1
Weird one but if you focus on the title and look at trump with your peripheral vision, he looks exactly like kim jong un
1
JerseyCoJo5 days ago
+1
This a****** is playing irl battleship
1
Top_Conference_4775 days ago
+1
Corporal Pete said their navy had been destroyed
Surely he wouldn’t lie
1
oneseason20005 days ago
+1
Seems like an unneeded statement tbh considering what has constituted a target by this administration to date; [https://www.npr.org/2026/01/27/nx-s1-5688765/boat-strikes-us-cocaine-venezuela-fishermen](https://www.npr.org/2026/01/27/nx-s1-5688765/boat-strikes-us-cocaine-venezuela-fishermen)
1
dbandit15 days ago
+1
"Their Navy is totally destroyed"
1
oldcreaker5 days ago
+1
But he said he destroyed all their ships.
1
FingerCommon70935 days ago
+1
2 million dollar missile to shoot down a $250.oo drone. Wonder how many drones it will take to eliminate our stockpiles of patriot missiles?
1
Ezpz_commentz5 days ago
+1
If US ships are in range of Iran's air and naval drones I fully expect we'll see US Navy ships get droned before this is over.
Good luck stopping near daily or at least weekly coordinated strikes from missiles, mid-to long range drones *and* sea drones all attacking at the same time.
If nothing else the US Navy ships blockading the Strait could very quickly run out of defensive munitions.
1
SkyAdministrative9705 days ago
+1
Freindly reminder of the time the us ran a war game against a simulated iran and got there asses handed so hard by asymmetric suicide speed boats they had to restart the exercises with a bunch of restrictions on red team to make them "fight fair" and guarantee a blue victory. They are scared.
1
bier00t5 days ago
+1
Didnt he say that all iranian "boats" are destroyed?
1
Moniguess25 days ago
+1
The U.S. Navy is probably in the most danger since the 2nd world war. Modern drones warfare has shown to disproportionately affect naval warships. Nations like Ukraine could force the Russian navy into port with a few groups of drone boats strapped with explosives, imagine what Iran could do if they strapped the explosive power of a shahed drone onto a remote controlled drone boat. This will not end well for our navy. Most navy’s in the world are already outdated. Ours is no different.
1
n0respect_5 days ago
+1
inb4 "fast attack boats" are really just boats
1
studiesinsilver5 days ago
+1
I thought their navy was wiped out?
1
sergei-rivers6 days ago
+1
Not obliterated?
1
MachineSpirited70856 days ago
+1
Will this admin say "pay a toll or risk being sunk" ?
1
Broad-Lobster74706 days ago
+1
I thought they would just let them strike their ships.
1
redcyanmagenta6 days ago
+1
They still have fast-attack ships after being obliterated?
1
UbiSububi86 days ago
+1
Anyone remember him addressing the nation telling us how destroyed the Iranian military was?
176 Comments