ListNook

InvestigatorOk9354 Apr 14, 2026 +195

Good thing we completely obliterated their navy when this thing started right? There's no fast attack ships left to do that with, right?

195

alexjbuck Apr 14, 2026 +52

Fwiw, the conventional Iranian Navy (IRIN) appears to have been largely eliminated (lots of photos of them being struck in port largely) but the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy (IRGCN) which is basically only little fast boats may still have some capability.

52

Egad86 Apr 14, 2026 +2

I was under the impression that the IRGC was better funded and better equipped than the IRIN.

2

I-figured-it-out Apr 15, 2026 +1

There are reports of a carrier -the most protected of US navel vessels departing theatre damaged by small drones and speedboats. The efficacy of those vaunted US ship to ship weapons seems a little underwhelming. Swarms of gnats, are bloody hard to wholly eliminate.

1

InvestigatorOk9354 Apr 14, 2026 -22

Great point, I wonder if sailors will appreciate this fact when they are under attack by IRGC fast attack boats

-22

Bruvvimir Apr 14, 2026 +12

Those boats are the equivalent of a Hilux with an MG mounted at the back. Don't think the US Navy is particularly concerned.

12

InvestigatorOk9354 Apr 14, 2026 +4

That's reassuring, so the US Navy should be able to reopen the strait without any issues then, right?

4

Substantial-Reward70 Apr 14, 2026 +5

Reopen? Why? If they’re closing it right now.

5

TopofthePyramid Apr 14, 2026 +12

You seem a little slow, so let me assist. They are not a threat to the US Navy. A commercial vessel is a different story.

12

SporksInjected Apr 14, 2026 +1

I don’t think the navy is escorting anyone.

1

External_Counter378 Apr 14, 2026 +1

Right because the US has never been defeated with improvised weapons

1

Responsible-Ad-1086 Apr 14, 2026 +3

Am from the UK so know this didn’t need /S…. However other countries listnookors have no sarcasm detectors

3

DeadlyFern Apr 14, 2026 -5

Oh you sweet summers child.

-5

[deleted] Apr 14, 2026 +8

[deleted]

8

savuporo Apr 14, 2026 -1

Last year Houthis got a F-18 off USS Truman just by existing. Hubris isn't helpful

-1

FostertheReno Apr 14, 2026 +10

Their biggest win is a plane falling off the deck because an aircraft carrier did an evasive maneuver…

10

[deleted] Apr 14, 2026 +7

[deleted]

7

DarthShiv Apr 14, 2026 +1

Yeah the US was completely ok with that debacle

1

lefix Apr 14, 2026

They don’t need to, they are threatening cargo ships, not the US navy. And now the US navy does the job for them.

0

anomie89 Apr 14, 2026 +17

I mean, the US navy vessel will probably just blow them up fairly quickly.

17

I-figured-it-out Apr 14, 2026 -20

With what ammo?

-20

fury420 Apr 14, 2026 +20

With America's still barely touched stockpiles of anti-ship weaponry.

20

Odd-Seaworthiness826 Apr 14, 2026 -15

Unlikely, shooitng $5m missiles is a losing equation. The US has been using been using a-10 as the counter to IRGC boats.

-15

HyenaThen572 Apr 14, 2026 +4

You realize that our ships have traditional munitions for this kind of thing, right? It's literally why the 5 inch navel gun even exists.

4

Odd-Seaworthiness826 Apr 14, 2026 -1

A single gun, even multiple guns is not an effective solution It lacks the range and speed to handeling a 1500 boat getting in range to launch torpedos. It was not designed to handle a swarm. This was literally the scenario that was exposed in the 2002 millennium challenge. During the games Marine Lt. Gen. Paul Van Riper sunk a US fleet using a swarm of attack boats. Iran has modeled their defense after those games The A-10 is the counter to that. Its has the range, armour, ammo to handle this threat.

-1

HyenaThen572 Apr 14, 2026 +4

You think a 1500 boat swarm is going to be put together? Not a chance in hell. They don't have torpedos btw. It's not WW2 anymore. The only possible way for these to threaten a US ship is with missiles that are easily defeated by CWIS.

4

[deleted] Apr 14, 2026 +18

[deleted]

18

Successful-Medicine9 Apr 14, 2026 +9

I think they mean what kind of ammo, which is also a strange question. Maybe they think US Navy vessels are only armed for conventional warfare against similar sized ships? Idk

9

supercali45 Apr 14, 2026 -18

US military is weak as shit right now except for The big bombs .. all the competent Generals are gone

-18

Based-God- Apr 14, 2026 +3

the big gun they have on the front of every warship and 25mm auto canons or 50. cal machine guns if they get too close for the big gun.

3

Odd-Seaworthiness826 Apr 14, 2026 +7

A-10, a burst of 30mm will shred a fast attack boat.

7

timkyoung Apr 14, 2026 +3

Aren't there also, like, ship-based attack helicopters that could handle this role as well? (I don't know. GPT told me that was an available option.)

3

Odd-Seaworthiness826 Apr 14, 2026

Not that im aware of. Helis fly low enough to be in range of the boats guns and lack the armor of an a-10. Perhaps as support or cleanup.

0

Majestic-Attitude615 Apr 14, 2026 -1

it's a good idea - but you would have to keep a lot of assets in the air all the time for that much coastline - and I don't know how long we would be willing to sustain that much activity - they would probably wait for things to die down and take some pot shots - start the activity up again - and - how long could that go on for - I wonder how many drones and tiny boats they have hidden all over the place

-1

Odd-Seaworthiness826 Apr 14, 2026 +3

A10s have a long time on station and they dont need to fly until movements is detected.

3

Boyhowdy107 Apr 14, 2026 +19

Fast attack boats against the US Navy would be a suicide mission. There is always a chance when it comes to guerilla warfare, but still. However, Trump is missing the point. The fast attack boats aren't about threatening the navy, they're about threatening commercial trade. I would assume we all have played a video game enough to know e***** missions suck. Shit that wouldn't threaten you head-to-head can still cause a mission failure by hitting the stuff you are trying to protect, or force you into an disadvantageous spot you wouldn't normally position yourself in to try and protect something else. So Trump's threat is basically chest beating about a tactic the IRGC probably isn't considering and a scenario that is not the one crucial to what the US considers it's (recently established) objective in the war.

19

UncleLazer Apr 14, 2026 +2

Cool. Now I have some Elder Scrolls e***** mission flashbacks.

2

wrt-wtf- Apr 14, 2026

The US isn’t there to play e*****. They’re there as a blockade.

0

YellowBook Apr 14, 2026 -1

Underwater drones will be having some fun

-1

Used_Butterfly3959 Apr 14, 2026 +5

Almost certainly, as fast attack craft have practically no weapons that can threaten a modern destroyer.

5

toxic0n Apr 14, 2026 +1

Have you seen what Ukranian sea drones did to the Russian Navy? Do you think Iran has the capability to build sea drones?

1

Colbert2020 Apr 14, 2026 +4

Unlike other Listnookors, I do not underestimate drones. I will say that the US navy is far more competent and would not have had the same losses experienced by Russia. It is all about detection and screening. Ukraine is absolutely the expert when it comes to this kind of thing. But Iran is not. They do possess sea drones, but they are much slower and cruder than Ukraine's. At least right now. Necessity is the mother of invention and Iran is a large country. They might be able to manufacture c**** naval drones and scale their production in the coming months. I'm not sure they will be able to if they cannot source the electronics needed.

4

Used_Butterfly3959 Apr 14, 2026 +4

Broke, poorly maintained Russian navy? Yes. Second question? No.

4

toxic0n Apr 14, 2026

I hope you're right and I'm not even American. Assymetric warfare can be tough. See Iranian drones against US AA. Some will get through.

0

InvestigatorOk9354 Apr 14, 2026 +2

sounds like it should be super easy to open the strait then?

2

Used_Butterfly3959 Apr 14, 2026 +10

Isn't the US closing it?

10

InvestigatorOk9354 Apr 14, 2026 +5

I can't keep track any more, this war is so confusing

5

[deleted] Apr 14, 2026 -6

[deleted]

-6

Used_Butterfly3959 Apr 14, 2026 +5

Think the US is the one closing it right now. You know with the whole announcement and the ships moving to close it.

5

shinku443 Apr 14, 2026 +3

They're closing it on top of it already being closed by iran. So it's a double negative so I think it's actually open now

3

[deleted] Apr 14, 2026 -3

[deleted]

-3

Used_Butterfly3959 Apr 14, 2026 +5

[https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/apr/13/strait-of-hormuz-blockade-what-why-explained-navy-trump-iran](https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/apr/13/strait-of-hormuz-blockade-what-why-explained-navy-trump-iran) Oops.

5

Colbert2020 Apr 14, 2026

You really need to read more than headlines. The situation before the US "blockaded" the strait is that Iran was giving "permission" for ships to pass through if they paid a toll. These ships assumed they could pass unmolested. Vessels docking at Iranian ports to buy their oil were also permitted to pass. Iran was ending benefiting from the high oil export prices and the toll. So, the US has put a stop to this. While the war is going on, the US is not allowing any vessel to dock with Iran and also isn't allowing ships to pass if they paid the "toll."

0

timkyoung Apr 14, 2026 +1

Sending in a naval group who's mission is to prevent any traffic from passing through the strait is a very different task than assuring the safe passage of all civilian ships through the strait.

1

Account_no_62 Apr 14, 2026 -4

They've already learned how they would lose from numerous small boats destroying the navy. As k general riper.

-4

Used_Butterfly3959 Apr 14, 2026 +5

You mean if they break the laws of physics with teleporting motorcycles and multi ton missiles on top of rowboats? I'm gonna put my money on the USN. Riper was a shit who wanted a soundbite for his consulting work, not a serious adversary. He gamed the engine of his simulation to teleport his ships into a CSG and then keep their defenses off. He then threw a hissy fit after being told he can't win a chess game by throwing his pieces at the opponent and pissing on the board.

5

[deleted] Apr 14, 2026 +5

[deleted]

5

Account_no_62 Apr 14, 2026 -1

They literally had to remake the war games in 2002 because the navy lost. The most expensive games to date, lost 19 ships in less than 10 minutes from a combination of speed boats, missiles, and airplanes without radio communications. Now the boats are faster and they have more drones than aircraft.

-1

RiPPeR69420 Apr 14, 2026 -6

Some capability is an understatement. The fast attack boats are similar in or surpass the capability of the Ukrainian drones that have fucked up the Russian navy. They represent the majority of the prewar combat power of the Iranian Navy.

-6

PrestondeTipp Apr 14, 2026 +6

Wow, then Iran is really fucked if that's their prewar combat power

6

rhino369 Apr 14, 2026 +4

And why hasn’t the Iranian gov used these to f*** up the US carrier groups that were pounding Iran for weeks? Because they can’t actually do it. Maybe in tight quarters, but the US isn’t parked right off Iran.

4

posthuman04 Apr 14, 2026

How easy will it be to mistake fishing boats for them?

0

Frustrated9876 Apr 14, 2026 +1

Fish populations gunna EXPLODE!!

1

euph_22 Apr 14, 2026 +32

We've destroy the Iranian Navy on days 1,2,3,5,8,13 and 21.

32

XO1GrootMeester Apr 15, 2026 +2

Fibonacci numbers, next claim will be on day 34

2

PrestondeTipp Apr 14, 2026 +5

Sure, if you consider speedboats a navy The same way I consider my daughter in T-ball a professional athlete

5

MouldyPingu Apr 14, 2026 +4

Well it's great to get paid for doing something you love.

4

xnmyl Apr 14, 2026 +2

They're literally the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Core **Navy** They're a Navy just like The Bears are a professional football team. Just because they suck doesn't make them not a Navy

2

Mr_Industrial Apr 14, 2026 +1

I dont think the bears would be a navy even if they were good.

1

Common-Concentrate-2 Apr 14, 2026 +8

[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ga-5CTcXn4Y](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ga-5CTcXn4Y) They may not be in the actual water yet - Another thing stored in a tunnel

8

Competitive-Fruit-18 Apr 14, 2026 +6

Personally enjoyed their rock disguise at the beginning

6

the_jokes_on_u Apr 14, 2026 +12

Their formal navy is fundamentally destroyed. Speed boats are hard to assess as part of someone’s navy lol…

12

Frustrated9876 Apr 14, 2026 +5

Ukraine doesn’t even HAVE a navy, but Russian ships keep sinking. 🤷‍♂️

5

vreemdevince Apr 15, 2026 +1

Their ships sink regardless of being at war/in conflict. It's the nature of Russian vessels.

1

TheSleepyTruth Apr 14, 2026 +3

These "fast attack ships" would not really constitute a navy by any modern definition. They are literally more akin to small civilian motor boats that can carry a couple dudes with machine guns. Maybe rigged with explosives for a suicide mission.

3

treesandcigarettes Apr 14, 2026 +2

they've got speedboats stored up in underground bunkers along the coast. by navy they meant all of the significant warships. no speedboat is getting anywhere near a US warship before getting shot down

2

daroach1414 Apr 14, 2026 +2

Water boats have been eliminated but lava boats are still a problem

2

Sxualhrssmntpanda Apr 14, 2026 +2

Even if it were (it's not), that's not the reason they say this. The reason they say this is so that they have an excuse to blow up anything and anyone they want and then claim it was an honest mistake because they thought it was an Iranian fast attack ship. Pretty much straight from the IDF playbook.

2

geekworking Apr 14, 2026 +41

Tens of millions of dollars per missile to shoot at row boats. Military contractors rejoice!

41

CRUSTBUSTICUS Apr 14, 2026 +7

They have other weapons systems for things like this that are astronomically cheaper per shot.

7

InvestigatorOk9354 Apr 14, 2026 +4

Anything to keep the market going up, it's all we have left

4

restore_democracy Apr 14, 2026 +6

At least the Dow is over 50k!

6

InvestigatorOk9354 Apr 14, 2026 +6

Can someone ask Pam what the Dow is at right now?!?!

6

timkyoung Apr 14, 2026 +3

Pretty sure missiles aren't the first line of defense against fast attack boats. Guns on the ships, helicopters with guns and A-10s with guns would likely be the first choice before missiles. Because, like you said, missiles are expensive. But bullets are relatively c**** in comparison.

3

Rustic_gan123 Apr 14, 2026

Depending on the missile (harpoon, hellfire) up to 1.5 million.

0

ikesbutt Apr 14, 2026 +23

Dear US Congress......... please grow a spine and get grandpa out of the White House?

23

InvestigatorOk9354 Apr 14, 2026 +10

"Best we can do is nothing. 🤷‍♂️" - Congress

10

Sxualhrssmntpanda Apr 14, 2026 +3

Congress? How about the 200 million citizens saying they didnt vote for this? The U.S. government have made it *very* clear they will not lift a finger to stop all this and are fine with the constant lies.

3

ikesbutt Apr 14, 2026 +1

Am almost 72 and can barely take my trash dumpster to the end of the driveway but I wish I could participate in "no kings" protests

1

Sxualhrssmntpanda Apr 14, 2026 -2

I appreciate your conviction. It is more than most show. That being said, weekend strolls do not affect the government. They might raise awareness but they will not force change on their own.

-2

ikesbutt Apr 14, 2026 +1

Agree.........maggots need to be voted out of office but I live in a predominantly red state (Missouri) full of maggots. I live in St. Louis which is blue but the rest of the state except for Kansas City and Columbia is red.........full of bigots and dumb asses that have their heads up their asses.

1

supercali45 Apr 14, 2026 +4

He has been repeating the same stupid shit since the start of the war He is fucked and just trying to two week the world’s economy to it’s collapse

4

mlody11 Apr 14, 2026 +19

How did we go from "Open the F-n' strait, you crazy b******, or you'll be living in Hell" to we'll destroy any Iranian ship that attempts to open the US blockade of the strait in less than 2 weeks?

19

Anfield_Cowboy Apr 14, 2026 +11

Blockading does make sense as part of negotiations

11

ddollarsign Apr 14, 2026 +9

he’s pulling the old bugs bunny trick where you switch sides and your opponent starts arguing for your side so you let them win but really you won

9

restore_democracy Apr 14, 2026 +2

By “he”, you mean the dead Iranian guy who is outsmarting Trump?

2

IAMA_Drunk_Armadillo Apr 14, 2026

That would be Bugs Elmer is Trump

0

InvestigatorOk9354 Apr 14, 2026 +11

When you have no plan, strategy, or goals anything is possible in 2 weeks time!

11

Fateor42 Apr 14, 2026 +4

We didn't. The blockade is only against Iran not the entire strait.

4

Ghola_Mentat Apr 14, 2026 +9

He said it applied to anyone paying Iran for passage. Those ships and the Iranian ships are the only ones getting through.

9

Hogesyx Apr 14, 2026 +1

Can’t wait for US navy to destroy tankers owned by the rest of the world. /s

1

Acceptable_Noise651 Apr 14, 2026 +3

They will just send boarding parties and commandeer the ships, filled oil tankers have value.

3

foul_ol_ron Apr 14, 2026 +2

If China is getting oil from there, it may lead to interesting times indeed.

2

Hogesyx Apr 14, 2026 +2

The type of things that gonna works wonder for geopolitics and not a rogue militant. /s

2

Richardogod Apr 14, 2026 +1

It'll make the us lots of money but screw the rest of the world. But hey, that's what Americans have been doing for a century now.

1

mlody11 Apr 14, 2026 +1

Look at me, I'm the captain now. Seriously, that should go over well.

1

rhino369 Apr 14, 2026 +1

Right so Iran is blocking 90% of traffic and the US is blocking the 10% that benefits Iran. I don’t see what’s confusing people.

1

Fateor42 Apr 14, 2026

Cool, but Trump can say whatever he wants to the public, the orders that actually came down to the military however were to blockade Iran ports in specific.

0

toxic0n Apr 14, 2026 +2

Dementia needs no reason

2

[deleted] Apr 14, 2026 +12

[deleted]

12

Golden-Rule-2024 Apr 14, 2026 +2

It's almost like there never really was a rescued pilot. Are they looking for a non descript person to play one on Faux news....that they can prance around?

2

PerfectReflection155 Apr 14, 2026 +11

Why is the US blocking the straight? Like just wtf is going on there now following the failed negotiations? Is US at War or just throwing its toys around in the water?

11

Based-God- Apr 14, 2026 +9

because if the gulf countries cant ship their oil the Iranians cant either

9

PrestondeTipp Apr 14, 2026 +11

Because Iran sells 90% of its oil through the strait. Blockading it effectively cripples Iran's economy.

11

ArtisticAd7795 Apr 14, 2026 +4

The US is currently using the blockade as a "Landlord's Leverage" play. By throttling the Strait, they are attempting to force a global dependency on high-priced US energy exports (like LNG) while simultaneously trying to squeeze Iran into a total nuclear surrender. The "failed negotiations" in Islamabad provided the perfect pretext to shut the door, but the real target is the world economy forcing allies into 20-year "vassalage" contracts under the guise of "maritime safety." It’s less about a war with Iran and more about an economic siege to secure US energy dominance for the next two decades

4

Sreg32 Apr 14, 2026 +1

There's so many toys to throw around Iran blocked it first, toddler Trump didn't like that so blocked it as well. So much blocking and so much unneeded global mayhem. But apparently Trump has anointed himself Jesus now, so all we be good lol

1

captHij Apr 14, 2026 +6

I was under the impression that trying to sink each other is the kind of things navies are supposed to do during a war. It would be kind of weird if they got together and shared a pleasant tea. It is also an admission that the administration's effort to end the war was a complete failure. A better man would be embarrassed at this kind of public emasculation. Must be nice to not be self aware.

6

kraftdinnerwithsalsa Apr 14, 2026 +11

Old man shit pants, world reacts

11

nn666 Apr 14, 2026 +7

They will just bomb the boats, is this the dumbest timeline ever? Trump is literally making things worse for the rest of the world because he is an idiot. The world should bomb the US boats. Then we can all live in peace without these morons attacking everyone all the time in the name of "peace".

7

PrestondeTipp Apr 14, 2026 +6

Oh just bomb the boats. It's so simple, just bomb the most powerful navy in the world.

6

nn666 Apr 14, 2026 +3

Almost as easy as opening the straight huh. They gave up and are joining in on closing it. Sounds like another great idea from Trump.

3

TrashCapable Apr 14, 2026 +4

I thought the Iranian navy was destroyed?

4

Artyparis Apr 14, 2026 +2

Sounds like a perfect plan, as usual.

2

johnnycyberpunk Apr 14, 2026 +5

Ah. So the Navy will be blowing up random ships (based on Grok or ChatGPT ‘targeting data’) and they already plan to blame it on “Iranian fast attack ships”, whatever that is. Get ready for more dead Iranian civilians

5

Trahst_no1 Apr 14, 2026 +3

He thinks the Iranians are scared to die.

3

iDarth Apr 14, 2026 +4

Does he think Iranian fast-attack ships will expect flowers and champagne when they come close to the blockade?

4

CrabPeopleVibes Apr 14, 2026 +3

Can this fat f*** go one day without saying something?

3

Blunt_Hadder Apr 14, 2026 +3

Blowing up go-fast boats in Caribbean wasn’t enough without any proof now US Terrorist wants to blow up go-fast transport boats in West Asia?

3

BOPSurfcasting1 Apr 14, 2026 +2

You block our tankers, we block your tankers, everybody blocks everyone's tankers. Just like a nuclear war nobody wins in a oil war. What follows is oil winter.

2

Aggressive-Fail4612 Apr 14, 2026 +2

Great we can spend a million dollars eliminating a $5000 drone jet ski. We learned nothing from the war in Ukraine

2

flimsypantaloon Apr 14, 2026 +2

Trump is so full of shit that anything he says is ignored.

2

Green_Shape_3859 Apr 14, 2026 +1

It’s not a US blockage. It’s an Iranian blockade which the US is copying because they couldn’t defeat the Iranian blockade. A blockade that was the result of unwarranted aggression in the region

1

BenMullen2 Apr 14, 2026 +1

ngl: could just be an email to the navy people. kinda obvi

1

-Th3Saints- Apr 14, 2026 +1

On a larger body of water Ukraine drove out Russia with defacto no navy. True Russia is not a naval power and Iran does not have easy access to west tech to build a drone navy but i get the feeling they are going to make an effort.

1

catbaloney Apr 15, 2026 +1

No way! Really? F****** defense 101. Homie plz shut up. He just has to say something. Try silence. Everyone will like that. Channel Teddy Roosevelt. Trump's big stick diplomacy is all wrong.

1

I-figured-it-out Apr 15, 2026 +1

Trump is a genius at gas lighting the markets, pity he is a moron in every other regard!

1

pre_pun Apr 15, 2026 +1

> total control. Bing bing, bong bong bong, bing bing. You know what that is, right? We can only hope it's the Fool's Gold Code they gave him for the nukes.

1

Moontoya Apr 17, 2026 +1

Fabs costing maybe 250k sunk by missiles costing 2million fired from ships costing a million a day to operate Great return on expenditure, I can hear the military complex springing a chubby

1

schu4KSU Apr 14, 2026 +1

He’s saying this for one reason. Has been told this stunt is very risky to US sailors if it escalates.

1

foul_ol_ron Apr 14, 2026 +2

If he can grow the conflict, he can show his voters how brave he is /s

2

Accomplished-Moose50 Apr 14, 2026 +1

I have a feeling that this days we will the the first sunken aircraft carrier.

1

HippyHunter7 Apr 14, 2026 +1

The f*** is a fast attack ship? No navys doctrines call for PT boats anymore and modern destroyers don't engage at those ranges.

1

Used_Butterfly3959 Apr 14, 2026 +3

Iran's navy has a handful of very old, very obsolete missile and PT boats. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tondar-class\_fast\_attack\_craft](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tondar-class_fast_attack_craft) [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zulfighar\_class\_air-defence\_boat](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zulfighar_class_air-defence_boat) [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peykaap\_I-class\_torpedo\_boat](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peykaap_I-class_torpedo_boat)

3

jsnxander Apr 14, 2026 +4

A Toyota Hilux with a snorkel kit and propellers.

4

rhino369 Apr 14, 2026 +2

They are likely to be somewhat effective in the strait because it’s so tight. But the US navy isn’t dumb enough to send vulnerable ships through the strait to get ambushed. These fast attack boats cannot clear the F-35s patrolling the strait.

2

adhq Apr 14, 2026 +1

Wannabe tough guy keep trying to play tough. He didn't get the message so far - next message won't be so subtle, me thinks...

1

LittleShrub Apr 14, 2026 +1

He’ll be golfing though.

1

16ozbuddz Apr 14, 2026 +1

Let's see if he takes the bait

1

BOPSurfcasting1 Apr 14, 2026 +1

5 - 6 weeks this war will take Trump reckoned, we are now at 6 weeks, 2 days with no end in sight.

1

deimoshipyard Apr 14, 2026 +1

Same system of kill!

1

Zatharas1 Apr 14, 2026 +1

The Emperor also shared a lack of concern regarding small, one-manned fighters

1

OverlordDontHurtMe Apr 14, 2026 +1

Say what you want but no one here would take any amount of money to be in the Iranian navy right now.

1

vctrmldrw Apr 14, 2026 +3

What Iranian navy? Trump has told us on several occasions that they've been completely destroyed.

3

MissInkeNoir Apr 14, 2026 +1

"Sampan off the port bow." If you know you know

1

Ragnangar Apr 14, 2026 +1

Pretty sure he meant “water boats”.

1

Orwick Apr 14, 2026 -1

Didn't we already sink all their ships?

-1

Unlucky_Accountant71 Apr 14, 2026 +2

Mom says it's my turn to use this comment on the next Islamic Listnook guard corps post.

2

restore_democracy Apr 14, 2026 +1

Praise Allah!

1

GeeBee72 Apr 14, 2026

I thought all their boats were sunk. Completely wiped out. Sir! But Sir, how can they have boats and no boats at the same time? The lord works in mysterious ways.

0

restore_democracy Apr 14, 2026

The same way the Strait can be open and closed at the same time.

0

Joyous-Volume-67 Apr 14, 2026

IWouldLikeToSeeThat.Gif

0

iMaximilianRS Apr 14, 2026

Don’t these guys make drones? Think they can figure out how to make one for the water.

0

Ok-Account-1732 Apr 14, 2026 -5

Let the US Admirals do what ever is needed …..period ! LFG

-5

UdderSuckage Apr 14, 2026 +3

Needed for what? Having clear operational goals makes tactical decision-making a lot easier.

3

restore_democracy Apr 14, 2026 +2

To open the strait so we can close it ourselves!

2

CrimsonAntifascist Apr 14, 2026

Like "getting the f*** outta there"?

0

Trump says Iranian 'fast-attack' ships that come close to US 'blockade' will be eliminated

💬 Send a Message

166 Comments