Whatever side you are on - *this* is clearly not what he was elected to do. Ridiculous.
256
gonko_86Apr 1, 2026
+70
I think we’re at a point where everyone who is capable of seeing what he is has already seen it. Even some h******* republicans are making uncomfortable noises about him at the moment.
What’s left supporting him are people who will happily let him tell them what he was elected to do, even if it contradicts what he said yesterday completely.
70
DarkLordofDownvotesApr 1, 2026
+33
The major problem, with the people that still fervently support him and others that voted for him but feel uneasy now, is that people *hate* to admit when they are wrong. That is a problem that crosses the aisle too.
But it's true...sometime you are wrong.
33
thereoncewasahatApr 1, 2026
+17
He also betrayed them.
He flat out did the opposite of what he said he would do.
If this doesn't wake them up then there is no hope.
17
cchestersApr 1, 2026
+12
Their hate for "others" supercedes anything bad about Trump.
12
monster_syndromeApr 1, 2026
+5
The issue is that a lot of policy decisions aren't really felt for years after they're signed into law. That's the biggest thing about the whole Iran conflict - the gas prices immediately went up so his base knows that Trump + Iran "war"= expensive gas.
5
THE-BSApr 1, 2026
+2
Admitting you are wrong is a sign of intelligence. How do you learn if everything you do is "correct"
2
gonko_86Apr 1, 2026
+2
If you’re already more smarterer than everyone you don’t need to do more learnin’
2
IjnefvijefnvifdjvkmApr 1, 2026
+22
let’s be clear. His supporters at this point are just a grouping of the intellectually challenged deplorables.
22
AdmirableBus6Apr 1, 2026
+3
Well of course at this point in his presidency the only supporters are gonna be h******* maga but when the next contender steps forward, assuming that a****** doesn’t condemn himself with attempted to seize a third term, the rest of the party will still support them
3
jimicusApr 1, 2026
+3
Which appears to constitute approximately 25-30% of the electorate.
3
Protean_ProteinApr 1, 2026
+3
Always has in the US. What’s fascinating is that Trump managed to hang onto another 25% or so of Republicans despite his obvious flaws. The Electoral College is a big part of the problem, but so is ideological recalcitrance.
3
jimicusApr 1, 2026
+2
I meant electorate in general, not just those who bother to vote.
2
Protean_ProteinApr 1, 2026
+2
Yeah. Back in the day it was “fundamentalist Christians” (voting for Bush I, especially…). Reagan was unconscionably popular…
2
Siggy1963Apr 1, 2026
+1
That's the nice way of putting it
1
Efficient_Resist_287Apr 1, 2026
+2
I don’t believe it.
US electorate is not sophisticated at all and highly believes in its own hype and media propaganda.
US electorate loves to hear its own ignorance out loud and will push back on contrary arguments.
Nothing happening right now should even be a surprise. Tariffs…Strait of Hormuz…NATO allies refusing to take part in an undeclared war, there is a historical precedents for all those.
2
jpk195Apr 1, 2026
+13
Trump says a lot of things.
It’s clear if he can, he’ll put the US out of NATO.
It helps Russia after all.
Not clear that he can do that though.
13
MagicBoyUKApr 1, 2026
+13
He can't. Congress passed a law in 2024 that stops him doing that. Rubio was one of the primary sponsors. 🤣
13
TemporarySun314Apr 1, 2026
+4
and you think rubio and republicans in general are afraid to be hypocrites? and have enough spine to say no to their king?
4
MagicBoyUKApr 1, 2026
+1
They don't have a King. The law says the President can't unilaterally remove the USA from NATO.
1
TemporarySun314Apr 1, 2026
+1
And trump Is not allowed to name the Kennedy center to Trump center, or the department of defense to department of war.
Still Trump just did it and Congress did absolutely nothing against it.
And when Trump removes us from NATO the same will happen. Not to mention that even a formal membership of the US will be worthless when Trump says that he as commander in chief would not send troops when article 5 is invoked...
1
jpk195Apr 1, 2026
+1
Congress may be a bunch of cowards, but this is one move they won’t just sit back and watch.
1
TemporarySun314Apr 1, 2026
+1
I will believe it when I see it...
1
DarkLordofDownvotesApr 1, 2026
+4
This is the ol' give Russia everything it wants or needs to defeat them plan.
Classic.
4
KradgetApr 1, 2026
+7
I may be mistaken, but I think he also just... doesn't have the legal authority to do that.
He can yell "I DECLARE TREATY VOID!" but I think it's a congressional power. If that's the case, legally, it's about as binding as if I did it.
7
DarkLordofDownvotesApr 1, 2026
+8
I think legally you are correct but what I have seen is just flagrant abuses of the law *and no actual recourse when it happens* which is, now, a glaring problem in U.S. law and government.
8
KradgetApr 1, 2026
+1
One place we have seen Republicans occasionally push back on is things that directly cut into their own power.
Not all the time, but ceding the ability to withdraw from the NATO treaty to appease a guy who isn't going to be president in 3 years is a pretty big red line to let him stumble through when he's telegraphing that move.
1
Nervous-Leading9415Apr 1, 2026
+8
The 2024 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) blocks the President from withdrawing from NATO without two-thirds of the Senate or an act of Congress.
8
TemporarySun314Apr 1, 2026
+3
and trump will just say, I will not come when europe is attacked.
and the congress will do nothing, because they dont wanna make their king look bad...
3
Nervous-Leading9415Apr 1, 2026
+2
Well the cracks are getting bigger and bigger. And I don’t mean the west wing
2
tekkerslovakiaApr 1, 2026
+8
To those of us watching from the other side of the Atlantic, this actually seems pretty similar to what he was elected to
8
DarkLordofDownvotesApr 1, 2026
+1
Well, to be clear, I think his platform was couched in terms of having Europe (and other nations that we support) pony up funds for their own defense, etc. fine, whatever. That resonated with a lot of Americans.
Thats different than invading Iran and crying when no one wants to help.
1
Dealan79Apr 1, 2026
+4
Are you sure about that? He made it absolutely clear that withdrawing from NATO would be an objective of his second term if re-elected in 2020, and his rhetoric on other NATO nations constantly portrayed them as being moochers who "steal" from the US. That didn't soften during Biden's presidency. This wasn't hidden. He said it loudly and often, and in media channels that were clearly broadcast to his base. If we're ever going to recover as a nation after Trump we need to come to terms with the fact that a lot of his voters wanted him to do the horrible things that he's doing or threatening to do, they just didn't want any of the consequences to affect them personally.
4
DarkLordofDownvotesApr 1, 2026
-1
Look man, it's been a long time and I feel like I lived a thousand lifetimes since he was re-elected but I did find this at least: https://abcnews.com/amp/Politics/allies-doubt-trump-threatened-bail-nato-spending-feud/story?id=56547031
Of course that's one article and I realize that - so don't pummel me into dust please. But, as an American, I don't remember a lot about any firm campaign promises about dropping out of NATO.
-1
skyper_markApr 1, 2026
+1
That's not really how most of his cult sees it. He has sold them the idea that NATO = bad and this to them is the cherry on top.
Of course, what matters will be the actual money and power behind Trump's presidency and I think they're still aware that leaving NATO is a terrible idea, so they won't go through with it.
It's gonna be yet another episode of common Trump behavior. He'll say a bunch of shit then slowly walk away when he sees nobody important was actually tagging along
1
seedless0Apr 1, 2026
+1
MAGA: That's why he's a genius!!!
1
ProcedureSeveral9058Apr 1, 2026
+1
Im sure his supporters will agree with him. They elected him cause they have the same room temperature iq
1
Gentle_SnailApr 1, 2026
+55
NATO is a defensive alliance - its not its job to bail Trump out of a offensive war that he barely even told anyone he was starting.
America should be leaning more on the unnamed other country in this war, as from leaks it seems like the conflict was initially their idea.
55
lidstahApr 1, 2026
+35
Let's not forget the fact he and his sycophants spent last year insulting his NATO allies while putting ridiculous tariffs on them, and threatening to invade a goddamn ally.
Narcissists bullies die alone.
35
EnthusiasmUnusualApr 1, 2026
+8
Exactly. The US was not attacked. If it was, like before, NATO would come to their aid.
8
StennanApr 1, 2026
+1
He could at least make the effort and bring the case by having his NATO representative invoke Article 5. It reads that the common defence is activated if US territory is attacked. To my knowledge, the US bases are not a part of the USA, even if they have troops stationed there. Also, if Tehran struck back in response to the initial attack by targeting only the US forces, they would have stronger legal standing than the US. But they are bombing all over the place, so I am not sure anyone is in the right other than the civilians who just want to be left alone.
1
DesperidesApr 1, 2026
+88
It has been kind of a pointless alliance since the American president started working for Russia.
88
Capital_Network4032Apr 1, 2026
+5
I get so confused lately, is he working for Russia or Israel?
5
DesperidesApr 1, 2026
+37
Both, until their goals conflict. Then we'll see who has more damning blackmail or bigger bribes.
The only demographic you can be absolutely sure he isn't working on behalf of is the American people.
37
Protean_ProteinApr 1, 2026
+5
Whoever the last powerful person is to speak with him. He has zero ideology and zero scruples. He just wants power and money.
5
calvin43Apr 1, 2026
+1
"And here's something else, Bob, I have eight different bosses right now."
"I beg your pardon?”
“Eight bosses.”
“Eight?”
“Eight, Bob."
1
PugsAndHugs95Apr 1, 2026
+11
The NDAA passed at the end of Bidens presidency had a measure in it that required 2/3rds of the senate or separate legislation passing both chambers as a requirement for withdrawing from NATO. NATO members wishing to leave require a years notice as well, and that was probably tied up in a previously ratified piece of legislation long ago.
So legal barrier is high, and since only Congress can declare war, military treaties by proximity are likely entirely or majority under their constitutional authority.
That’s assuming the Supreme Court isn’t entirely corrupt.
I think many sitting members of congress and the Supreme Court are waiting for a decline in perceived political power before turning against Trump. I think everyone wants to see the temperature of the water from the midterms before committing to a direction.
I also think that’s why the Trump administration has been trying so hard to build out the DHS as a brown shirt vehicle for voter intimidation and disruption. Along with challenges to birthright citizenship, mail in ballots, federal oversight of elections, and all that stuff. It’s quite literally a determining factor in Trump and his family and crime buddies power, and likelihood of prosecution and consequences of their actions.
11
Pol_PotamusApr 1, 2026
+2
Good thing Trump always follows the law.
2
deadR0Apr 1, 2026
+1
Aren't we in a war that congress didn't declare?
1
TheBurningEmuApr 1, 2026
+1
I don't think he can legally leave NATO officially, but as the Command In Chief of the armed forces he could, in theory, just refuse to honor the treaty by not sending forces if a NATO member was attacked. That would basically put any diplomatic credit the US has left (probably not much at this point, to be fair) in the shredder.
Again, it all comes down to congress actually doing their job and checking the power of the executive for any consequences to be on the table.
1
PugsAndHugs95Apr 1, 2026
+1
Congress is certainly THE issue. Congress can legislate, repeal legislation, offer constitutional amendments for ratification, and is the sole means by which to enforce consequences against the executive. The court can rule against the executive, but compliance relies on them being rule followers.
Congress could impeach the president, but the GOP Congress members are using Trump as a vehicle for self-enrichment, policy initiatives, and as a means to stay in power. Democrats also benefit from the lack of oversight and self enrich themselves as well. And are guilty of much the same when a Democrat holds the executive.
The biggest weakness though is that the states dictate ballot access and while the states control their own ballot laws, the parties have effectively been nationalized. You don’t get successful third parties because the Democrats and Republicans have used their state legislator members to effectively block the rise of successful third parties from forming and getting on the ballot.
Congress is effectively two national non profit political organizations. Those who run it decide effectively the political class in America and who gets inducted into it. They decide your choices and your choices will always fall in line with the party. Even if they let you run, they might use different tools to make you lose. See Bernie in the 2016 primaries as the perfect example.
1
EatpineapplerightnowApr 1, 2026
+19
I think his speech tonight is a withdrawel from Iran, going to blame his mess on NATO, and announce USA is pulling out of NATO
19
CheezyGoodness55Apr 1, 2026
+10
I think you're right: "Trump, in a phone interview with Reuters, said one element of his speech would be to express his disgust with NATO for what he considers the alliance's lack of support for U.S. objectives in Iran." As if. The U.S. has never registered lower in international estimation.
10
IcyColdFyreApr 1, 2026
+18
He can't pull out of NATO. Only congress can
18
AldrenApr 1, 2026
+23
Same with war spending eh?
23
BruceForsyth55Apr 1, 2026
+5
Doesn’t stop him and Kegseth refusing to back NATO with troops, etc if shit ever hit fan.
5
EatpineapplerightnowApr 1, 2026
+1
this is it. NATO is a deterence: its dead the min he announces it
1
EatpineapplerightnowApr 1, 2026
+6
i should have been more clear: he is going to TRY to pull USA out of NATO. It will end in supreme court.
6
deadR0Apr 1, 2026
+2
And they will "yes daddy" it
2
mreman1220Apr 1, 2026
+1
They didn't yes daddy his birthright citizenship rant today. Apparently he attended the hearing and stormed out when it went poorly for him.
1
liberal_texanApr 1, 2026
+3
I don’t see that stopping him from announcing it.
3
Troubleshooter11Apr 1, 2026
+2
Not officially, but i suppose he could minimize US involvement and cooperation with NATO from now on and keep yelling really often how the US is no longer going to help the rest of NATO. No, that would not make sense....yes, that would actually fit his style.
And yes, that could make Putin very eager to try something in the Baltic.
2
NorthernSlyGuyApr 1, 2026
+1
That never meant anything to king trump.
1
IjnefvijefnvifdjvkmApr 1, 2026
+2
Not true. The constitution is silent on ending treaties. Congress approves treaties, but that is all the constitution says. Presidents have cancelled treaties before and the SCOTUS refused to rule, saying it was a political question
2
Complex-Sugar-5938Apr 1, 2026
+15
They specifically passed a law requiring Congress to withdraw from NATO.
Not that it's enforceable in anyway if Trump just says he's not abiding by the terms.
15
IjnefvijefnvifdjvkmApr 1, 2026
+3
Thanks, important fact
3
EatpineapplerightnowApr 1, 2026
+3
yea, they did this under biden to prevent trump specifically from doing this, but the problem is that NATO is a deterence, and trump HAS the power to just not send troops. If he announces USA is out of NATO, its as good as dead
3
Greener-dayzApr 1, 2026
+4
Yeah exactly what he wanted. He knew they wouldn’t enter the war when he was calling for it, so he decided to make a public show of it to gather favor for the move. It’s a scheme, because republicans don’t want to foot the bill for security guarantees for Europe anymore so they can keep providing tax breaks to the rich instead of driving up the deficit.
If this happens it’s actually pretty damn bad for Europe in both the short term and long term and bad for the US in the long term.
4
Glove5751Apr 1, 2026
+2
Long term great for Europe, short term bad. For the US it's bad short term and long term.
2
Greener-dayzApr 1, 2026
+1
Why’s that? I don’t see how a post-NATO world is actually “great” for anyone apart of this discussion.
1
PickupyoheelApr 1, 2026
+4
This human being is so goddamn inept. He shouldn't even run a popcorn stand.
4
Unlucky_CloverApr 1, 2026
+5
It’s like living with the worst roommate of all time. He constantly complains about you for some of the most minute things, shits all over the kitchen and gets mad the other housemates won’t clean it up, and then he’s talking about leaving.
He looks so dumb
5
ScrotumScrapingsApr 1, 2026
+11
Go home yanks. We have nothing in common and you won't be missed.
11
EnthusiasmUnusualApr 1, 2026
+1
They have more in common with Russia and Iran and Saudi.
Culturally, great place ..but a political basket case.
1
ScrotumScrapingsApr 1, 2026
+1
Yup. They're just russians with obesity issues.
1
Siggy1963Apr 1, 2026
+5
He's mad because our allies won't bail him out of the mess he created
5
hoorhaayApr 1, 2026
+5
Like the demented child he is
5
dodgyrogyApr 1, 2026
+3
Standard Trump procedure. Start something with no real plan. Create a huge problem. Make a ridiculous claim of amazing success and claim victory. Leave everyone else to fix the problem he created and clean up his mess.
3
Efficient_Resist_287Apr 1, 2026
+3
Putin and Xi are high five’ing each other right now.
3
brownsfan760Apr 1, 2026
+3
Bullshit. He would lose every base in Europe.
3
crunchyeyeballApr 1, 2026
+2
Also weapons contracts. I doubt NATO would allow itself to be dependent on a non-NATO country for arms.
Once those supply chains move, they're not coming back anytime soon.
2
ExtruDRApr 1, 2026
+2
This would be the biggest self-own since Brexit.
2
westernsocietyApr 1, 2026
+3
How can 1 clown manipulate your entire country to its knees ? Seems crazy
3
B_da_man89Apr 1, 2026
+6
republican party should never have power in the US government in our lifetimes, barring a reform of the party.
6
EquivalentSpot8292Apr 1, 2026
+2
He’s going to blow it up by executive order, understanding the pieces can’t be put back together once it is declared illegal.
2
vexxed82Apr 1, 2026
+2
Is there one place/person that has compiled all of his flip-flops. We've won > they need to open the Strat > we're leaving > why isn't NATO helping > We'll leave any day now > if Iran doesn't open the strait we'll bomb more > we don't need the strait > etc.
2
DragonfruitPossible6Apr 1, 2026
+2
Who cares. If an attack happened on Europe it is already clear they wouldn’t be helping. Possibly they will be the ones doing it, based on the things the president himself says. Time for everyone to wake up.
2
ianbattlesrobotsApr 1, 2026
+2
Just jangle some keys in front of him until his Big Mac arrives
2
RymbeglaApr 1, 2026
+2
Will hurt US defense industry- no wonder EU defense stocks are climbing today
2
hornyandwetttApr 1, 2026
+1
Cholesterol do your job
1
MagicBoyUKApr 1, 2026
+4
It's f*** all to do with the allies and f*** all to do with NATO.
USA and Israel made an unprovoked attack on Iran and started a war. Iran never attacked the USA, so NATO articles don't apply.
Clean your own shit up, Donald.
4
anywho123Apr 1, 2026
+4
wtf does POTUS have so much power? Removing ourselves from a global organization feels like a decision that shouldn’t fall to one imbecile whose clearly corrupt.
4
aldernonApr 1, 2026
+4
Republicans in Congress can stop this dotard whenever they want.
Republican voters can pressure their representatives to do their job- *whenever they want*.
***THIS*** is America.
They’re complicit.
4
Charizard3535Apr 1, 2026
+3
Okay bye.
3
NightchadeBackAgainApr 1, 2026
+2
Withdrawal from NATO requires a 2/3 vote from the US Senate, thanks to a bill that was voted into law a few years ago. The irony here is that Rubio was one of the sponsors for that law.
2
poliranterApr 1, 2026
+1
Official withdrawel yes. But Trump can always simply order US troops to not assist and stay in barracks. So to all intents and purposes, if the president refuses to support NATO, the alliance is a dead letter.
1
WannabeshmwanabeApr 1, 2026
+1
You have no allies.
1
TheGOPisTheDeepStateApr 1, 2026
+1
Krasnov Trump the pedophile and Putin puppeteer is just following his orders.
1
dwainedibbleyApr 1, 2026
+1
Proving again that he is in Putins pocket
1
SyringApr 1, 2026
+1
Act NOW, think Later (maybe)
1
dallasdudeApr 1, 2026
+1
“You’re welcome, Vladimir, sir, just like you instructed!” —putins c*** holster
1
redpandafireApr 1, 2026
+1
Oh that's interesting. Who created the rift again?
1
LildatercreaterApr 1, 2026
+1
“A rift”, the same way that there’s a rift between everyone at the movie theater and some guy who comes up and takes a shit in the front.
1
SnooRegrets6428Apr 1, 2026
+1
Tonight announcement will be troop withdrawal and end of nato.
1
BountyMakesMeCoughApr 1, 2026
+1
Isn’t Nato a defensive pact as in ‘we help each other when attacked’, this pre-emptive plunderstrike in Iran doesn’t qualify.
1
Jon_MaceApr 1, 2026
+1
He is trying really hard to pass the blame
1
Living_Impress_7769Apr 1, 2026
+1
"Amid being a c*** to your allies" there I fixed it.
1
BasicAppointment9063Apr 1, 2026
+1
He has never demonstrated an understanding of any aspect of NATO.
1
rickymist1Apr 1, 2026
+1
[ Removed by Listnook ]
1
PetulaxApr 1, 2026
+1
Rift came bit earlier, well before Trump started the war with Iran without the Congress approval , when Trump announced he will take Greenland and make Canada part of the USA. That wasn’t smart, if he already knew he is going to attack Iran.
To troll your allies, before you actually could use their help.
1
gordonjames62Apr 1, 2026
+1
USA has allies?
I was under the impression that you don't try to insult, bully, intimidate or annex allies.
1
UUMDApr 1, 2026
+1
Trump can't withdraw from NATO without congressional authorization.
1
gordonjames62Apr 1, 2026
+1
>He claimed that the US has successfully made the regime “incapable” of developing such technology, **rendering the continued presence of a large ground force unnecessary**.
Cue up "the grand old duke of York" music
1
RinboxApr 1, 2026
+1
On the next episode of when clowns have tantrums
1
iamnosuperman123Apr 1, 2026
+1
Could the NATO countries just kick out US forces from Europe? Without NATO there is little point them being there
1
not_that_planetApr 1, 2026
+1
He reminds me of one of those assholes you play p**** with that ALWAYS bluffs and ALWAYS raises.
1
RhubarbAfter4008Apr 1, 2026
+1
It's been clearly on the table since day 1 of his second term. You can't threaten something you've already been doing and expect it to have an impact.
1
darktumblesApr 1, 2026
+1
US are the only country to ever need NATO. North Korea China Russia and the Middle East will love a NATO withdraw. When a Saudi knocked down 2 buildings and killed couple thousand people they got stomped out by NATO not just the US next time they get to just fight the US and look how well Iran is holding against US and Isreal.
1
lexcynApr 1, 2026
+1
I'm sure Congress will stop him from doing this.... /S
1
YelloeisokApr 1, 2026
+1
He can’t pull out of NATO - don’t get distracted from Epstein, gas prices, golfing, the economy, the east wing, ICE, Iran, etc.
1
dobrodudeApr 1, 2026
+1
Something is seriously fucked up in this country, if one man can pull us out of a treaty we've been in for 75 years.
1
Company_WhipApr 1, 2026
+1
Lol he would need 66 Senators. He's just butthurt from losing too much.
1
Che_VarackApr 1, 2026
I think I can't be more harder than now. (Not a US citizen)
123 Comments