Trump suggests US, Iran could work together to remove 'nuclear dust'

Bro there was literally people on the other side of it just recently and he called them

Nah dude even called Artemis II today, we're not safe from him even in space hidden behind the freaking Moon

That was nice for a while, wasn’t it?

You sure about that? If you haven't been there, how could you know there isn't some crappy online lunar tabloid pumping out formulaic stories about his every moronic utterance?

It’s worse than that. They sanewash everything.   He could say “you’re all gonna die tomorrow!!!!!! Or maybe I’ll just off the pope, or the president of a country starting with the letter C. Stay tuned. Whatever I do will be out of the goodness of my heart!!!!“  and media would report “Trump announced plans for tomorrow. Said stay tuned. He’s such a jokester.

> PRESIDENT RAMBLES INCOHERENTLY AGAIN, SHITS SELF

Can’t wait for my return flight.

You know the deal, We called the last guy Sleepy Joe because the World could sleep at night without a worry that at Friday Night he would be declaring a World Crisis.

He's either leaving willingly or he's getting dragged out kicking and screaming. That's assuming though the Big Macs don't do him in before then.

Oh hes not leaving office for sure.

No, that would be Don Jr

That was our firm position in the Obama administration. The Trump admin has basically just said, nope, too nice, we're going to back out of that and return to needling in various ways ("maximum pressure"). The Iranian leadership (not unreasonably) think that negotiating with Trump is a fool's errand because he can't be trusted. They're awful but you can understand why they might not want to give up all their power for vague promises of assistance, especially if it might decrease their own power even if it did arrive. Negotiating with these types of regimes is a delicate business which we've just steamrolled right over, with predictably bad results.

How is it not unreasonable??? The US attacking Iran literally enforced the precedent that unless you have nuclear deterrent you will be invaded. That precedent was set first by Russia attacking Ukraine, but it could be explained away bc Putin is a psychopath. The US following in those footsteps signals to all medium sized nations that they need to arm...and do it quickly. If you were running Iran today, would you give up nuclear weapons knowing that it's the only way to prevent an invasion? The post ww2 western world order worked under the fiction that rational democratic states would not start wars of aggression, therefore nuclear weapons were safe only in their hands. As of today, that is demonstrably no longer true and arguably never was. Iraq 2 at least was under false pretence with the consent of the "people" The attack on Iran just proved that what all the anti American regimes have been arguing for the last 50 years has merit - that the US wages wars for resources. Except this time the US can't even pretend there was a justification. Well played MAGA, you just gave every anti American zealout rhetorical ammunition for the next 50 years.

Arguably its between zero and 30 odd people in charge. You need the supreme leader to make executive decisions and hes currently laid up in a coma. One step down is all the regional leaders with there individual command structures, zones of influence and militarys to direct at the control of the regional leader. So nobody is capable of making overarching decisions and 30+ dudes of various ideological goals but generally pointed to survival at all costs are gonna be impossible to negotiate with. See you tomorrow when the ceasefire is broken because the peace negotiations keep going to a vegetables gmail and not the people who could do something

I suppose *technically* uranium cannot be destroyed on human timescales without a nuclear explosion or reactor?