· 143 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 23, 2026 at 3:40 PM

Trump tells BBC King's visit could 'absolutely' repair relations with UK

Posted by Alarming-Safety3200

Trump tells BBC that King's visit could repair relations with UK
BBC News
Trump tells BBC that King's visit could repair relations with UK
In a phone interview with the BBC's North America editor, the president discussed next week's visit and his relationship with the UK PM.
🚩 Report this post

143 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
mrfixitx Apr 23, 2026 +183
Only if the King is nice to him and tell him he is the best President ever though.... Otherwise we will get a temper tantrum and be told how weak the king is.
183
Somhlth Apr 23, 2026 +80
Only afterwards. Trump was famous for meeting with Trudeau and not having the balls to say anything until he got in his plane and started rage tweeting. That's his go to if someone isn't kissing his fat ass.
80
Yelworc0242 Apr 23, 2026 +21
He doesn't understand that the king has zero actual power.
21
gleipnir84462 Apr 23, 2026 +16
I mean, on paper the king does have power, but in practice any move by the king to influence politics would be ignored at best, and trigger a constitutional crisis at worse. Trump is not likely to know the difference between theoretical power and actual power.
16
melody-calling Apr 23, 2026 +7
the king meets with the prime minister every week with no witnesses present and I’ll bet you they don’t discuss the weather 
7
jimicus Apr 23, 2026 +33
They’re British. If there is one discussion I absolutely guarantee they’re having, it’s about the weather.
33
Vio_ Apr 24, 2026 +3
"I suggest you stick to two subjects: the weather and your health."
3
Killboypowerhed Apr 23, 2026 +1
It's no secret that chuck has met with politicians behind closed doors and influenced them
1
DFWPunk Apr 23, 2026 -1
That's not the same as having power. Politicians are influenced by all sorts of people.
-1
Jonestown_Juice Apr 24, 2026 +6
Trump doesn't know how the American system of government works. He damn sure doesn't know how the UK's works.
6
Protean_Protein Apr 23, 2026 -4
The King is literally the equivalent of the President in certain ways, in Canada at least—Head of State. The Prime Minister of Parliament rules at the behest of the monarch, who can, technically, dissolve parliament.
-4
Ortsarecool Apr 23, 2026 +2
"technically" is doing **a lot*" of work in that sentence
2
Protean_Protein Apr 23, 2026 +1
No it isn’t. The Governor General is literally the Monarch’s representative, and has that power.
1
Ortsarecool Apr 23, 2026 +2
Yes. He is. What do you think happens if they ever actually try to exercise that power?
2
ItsMeAstra Apr 23, 2026 +2
Trigger a constitutional crisis leading to an election.
2
Protean_Protein Apr 23, 2026 +1
The practical norms are there so long as people abide by them. Recent history has shown that democratic institutions held up by norms are beholden to the whims and good faith of those in power. Going all the way back to Thomas Hobbes’ (apparent, but not clearly anti-democratic) criticism of the English Revolution, we’ve had to contend with the fact that Sovereign power depends not merely on a tacit social contract, but on the teeth and will to enforce the law. So yes, there are practical realities we live with that make parliamentary monarchs effectively toothless. But that isn’t guaranteed. Hell, Russia’s post-Soviet descent into totalitarianism was built on the back of a constitutional Republic with term limits and everything.
1
gleipnir84462 Apr 23, 2026
Again, that's all theoretical power. Yes, he is technically head of state, and yes he does, on paper, have the power to dissolve parliament, refuse to acknowledge a prime minister, or even refuse to give assent for legislation, but in practice, any attempts by the king to do these things would likely see the royal family ousted completely. So while the king is the head of state in name, the defacto head is the PM, as the king cannot go against parliament without causing a constitutional meltdown. In reality, the king is a glorified ambassador these days, albeit a damn good one, and the source of much of Britain's soft power around the world.
0
Protean_Protein Apr 23, 2026 -2
No, it’s not theoretical. It is literal.
-2
samuraipanda85 Apr 23, 2026 +3
It doesn't matter. He hears the King and if that guys praises him than Daddy might finally love Donald.
3
Heisenberg_235 Apr 23, 2026 +1
Would require more than half a dozen brain cells for that
1
JaVelin-X- Apr 23, 2026 +5
And then During the speach he'll say "the king kissed his ass. When Everyone said the king never would"
5
Protean_Protein Apr 23, 2026 +2
Maybe he’ll have some high priced consorts who can pee on him or something. 🙄
2
Oldestswinger Apr 23, 2026 +2
He loves to meet other kings
2
MisterBlisterKisser Apr 23, 2026 +18
Dump is a dictator not a king. Don’t ever put him in the same class as King Charles.
18
caitnicrun Apr 23, 2026 -16
Is this the same king with the nonce for a brother?  Sounds like exactly the same class.
-16
MisterBlisterKisser Apr 23, 2026 +20
The King is not responsible for his brother’s actions. I am speaking solely about King Charles. If Dump were meeting with Andrew you’d have a point but he’s not. He’s meeting King Charles. 
20
BixbySn7der Apr 23, 2026 -9
He is not responsible for Andrew's crimes. But he knew for years what his brother was up to.
-9
MisterBlisterKisser Apr 23, 2026 +2
You expect blood to turn against blood?
2
TheDylorean Apr 23, 2026 +6
If the family member is doing something illegal and you are in a position of power meant to uphold the rule of law, yes.
6
MisterBlisterKisser Apr 23, 2026 +3
That’s not how reality works. 
3
caitnicrun Apr 23, 2026 +2
So you're saying if you learned a family member was molesting children you would NOT turn them in?
2
mob19151 Apr 23, 2026 +3
Yes wtf
3
MisterBlisterKisser Apr 23, 2026 +3
I’m not saying you shouldn’t turn in a family member. I’m saying it’s unrealistic to expect a person to turn on their family member. I bet a lot of crimes throughout history have been covered up due to family loyalty.
3
LittleSchwein1234 Apr 23, 2026 +6
It isn't the King's fault that his brother is a shithead, is it?
6
[deleted] Apr 23, 2026 -7
[removed]
-7
caitnicrun Apr 23, 2026 -1
Ah, nothing like a bit of the ol racism. And it's the North of Ireland! 😛
-1
MisterBlisterKisser Apr 23, 2026 +1
Not on any map I’ve seen. And since when is Irish a race? I’m Canadian and very pro-Britain. I very much support my monarch Charles III, King of Canada.
1
caitnicrun Apr 23, 2026 -1
Fair play to you.  I had some respect for the queen, but let's be honest: it's not like wee Charlie actually earned his position. - And since when is Irish a race? Since racists hang banners like KAT.
-1
MisterBlisterKisser Apr 23, 2026 -3
The Queen didn’t earn her position either. That’s not how royalty works. It’s an hereditary bloodline.  Irish are of the white race. This was determined years ago after Americans tried to claim Irish and Italians weren’t white. 
-3
caitnicrun Apr 23, 2026 +1
- The Queen didn’t earn her position either. But she did do her bit in the war.  I respect the things she's DONE, not just warming a crown for Charlie boy.  - Irish are of the white race.  Ah you're one of those gowls.  A mind is a terrible thing to waste.
1
TheSchlaf Apr 23, 2026 +1
And he wears a suit and says "thank you".
1
NaughticalNarwhal Apr 23, 2026 +1
>“Bestest boy evar” *(tussles trumps hair, gets pushed down a flight of stairs)* - King
1
Vio_ Apr 24, 2026 +1
"You are my second American president. The first was Joe." 
1
Lundetangen Apr 24, 2026 +1
King Charles seem rather old and would seem absurd to think of him as Prime Minister of the UK. Then you have Trump that is 2 years older as the President of the US.
1
jimmybirch Apr 23, 2026 -2
The king is weak on crime and foreign policy
-2
noir_lord Apr 23, 2026 +122
As a Brit, No it f****** won't. Most of us aren't that happy about him even going though some of us realise that we are also exposed to the US economy/tech in ways that are near existential (that's a fuckup of the past). This ain't gonna fix jack shit, he'll still be a war mongering felon who shits on his allies and MAGA can still f*** all the way off.
122
Dashyguurl Apr 23, 2026 +14
The king is only going at the behest of the government, Trump is obsessed with the royal family and his state visit is part of the reason the UK got one of the first ‘trade deals’ offered by Trump. They’re sending the king to defuse Trump and prevent another disaster based on Trump’s stupid whims.
14
Maeran Apr 23, 2026 +12
Last time the goodwill lasted 5 minutes. It is not worth the expense to play nice with Trump.
12
jimicus Apr 23, 2026 +3
Because the royals represent something Trump can never be in a hundred different ways.
3
DFWPunk Apr 23, 2026 +3
> They’re sending the king to defuse Trump and prevent another disaster based on Trump’s stupid whims. It's a bold strategy, Cotton. Let's see if it pays off for 'em.
3
seedless0 Apr 23, 2026 +7
Your king can offer TACO some phony title like Duke of Donnyville and invite him to the place to try the new gold throne, which is actually a deep dark dungeon out in nowhere...
7
Dingcock Apr 23, 2026 +3
The UK doesn't have much "nowhere" left anymore, would have to be an island like Saint Helena
3
jimicus Apr 23, 2026 +2
I’m struggling to see the problem with this.
2
eggyal Apr 23, 2026 +2
The good people of St Helena might disagree.
2
jimicus Apr 23, 2026 +1
How about Rockall?
1
Rod_ATL Apr 23, 2026 +1
Royal titles issued to US citizens are not recognized in the US. 
1
seedless0 Apr 23, 2026 +6
Like TACO cares?
6
RezzleG Apr 23, 2026 +2
Obviously it isn't 'fixing' the Trump regime but if it repairs UK/US relations to the point where the US is not so unpredictably hostile to us, then that is a short-term win for us while we work on energy independence and a slow but gradual decouple from the US in the long term. Whether you like Trump or hate him like most of the world does right now, you have to admit that having the US on-side is still hugely beneficial to the UK.
2
noir_lord Apr 23, 2026 +8
> realise that we are also exposed to the US economy/tech in ways that are near existential (that's a fuckup of the past). Yes, that is what I noted. > you have to admit that having the US on-side is still hugely beneficial to the UK. Not really, I actually think the US is net negative to the UK, it's just our economies are so intertwined we can't tell them to f*** off without wrecking ourselves, so instead we mitigate it as best we can, hence the King going to stand next to the idiot. Is what it is, Realpolitik matters more and in reality it kinda has to.
8
Dingcock Apr 23, 2026 +1
The US is the largest importer in the world. Germany imports less than half what the US does. The US imports more than 10% of total world imports. The US is also the UKs largest trading partner by far and by far the country the UK has the largest trade balance surplus with. It's hugely beneficial to the UK. Access to the US is hugely beneficial to any exporting country, including the UK. I would love for my own country to move away from this but it's going to be painful, and then what ? It's not like you can easily replace access to the US market.
1
noir_lord Apr 23, 2026 +5
We take the French route, we trade but we also don’t let them cross lines. Our market is valuable to them as well, if you include tech and services it’s huge. The problem currently is weaponising that doesn’t work because that assumes both sides are rational actors and one side is irrational. In the meantime we start making decisions that are best for *our* interests and Europe.
5
Dingcock Apr 23, 2026 +1
The UK market is valuable to the US but it's not the same. To the UK, the US is the #1 trade partner but to the US, the UK is #9. Also on the balance of trade, the UK wins as the net exporter to the US. The value is not the same, at all. I hate glazing the USA like this, but it's just reality at this point. I wish we made different decisions in the past but it is what it is.
1
noir_lord Apr 23, 2026 +3
US isn’t our largest trading partner, The EU is. They are large but a lot of that is financial/services and software/tech. Frankly our dependence on their big tech is one of our major problems (and the EU’s to be fair).
3
jimicus Apr 23, 2026 +1
If you look at international trade partners, you see a similar pattern across many countries. The top 3 or so are massive. After that, they start dropping off quickly. Even being in the top ten is no guarantee of significance.
1
Dingcock Apr 23, 2026 -1
The EU as a whole is yes, I don't think that is a fair comparison to one country.
-1
noir_lord Apr 23, 2026 +3
It’s a single trading bloc, agreements are signed with the EU, it’s entirely fair.
3
Dingcock Apr 23, 2026
Sure the agreements are signed at the EU level, even if you want to include them I'm not sure being #2 really changes anything I said...
0
Counterpoint-4 Apr 23, 2026 +1
You said it ' unpredictably'. Trump will turn on a dime so probably wasted effort but....we'll try!
1
DFWPunk Apr 23, 2026
You think this will somehow reduce the likelihood of him being unpreditably hostile? I don't think you've been paying attention.
0
RezzleG Apr 23, 2026 +1
Did I at any point say that the kings visit will gatuntee the reduction of the likelihood that the Trump administration will be unpredictability hostile towards the UK? I don't think you know how to read.
1
SKULL1138 Apr 23, 2026 +1
It’s not like the King can have any influence on the govt’s policy anyway. The Labour Party decides until the next election, not the King.
1
mob19151 Apr 23, 2026 +2
Trump doesn't need to know that.
2
BernardMatthewsNorf Apr 23, 2026 +1
I think he should go and be like 'I'm here in my capacity of King of Papua New Guinea.'
1
rgvtim Apr 23, 2026 +1
It wont do anything of substance, but it will massage Trump's ego, which is the biggest problem the US has right now.
1
noir_lord Apr 23, 2026 +1
Pretty much, it’s one of the more useful sides of been a constitutional monarchy, the king or queen is a figurehead head of state separate to the Government. They’ve been that way since Parliament became sovereign.
1
Ok-Assistant4338 Apr 23, 2026 +1
At the end of the day neither of our governments care about us. They’re going to do what’s best for them personally
1
Intruder313 Apr 23, 2026 +17
It will stroke Trump's ego at best.
17
Dominarion Apr 23, 2026 +8
Well the whole US has been hijacked to serve as Trump's ego stroker these past 10 years.
8
LincolnHighwater Apr 23, 2026 +2
That's pretty much all it takes, other than money. It's not like Trump has concerns other than his own personal gratification.
2
mob19151 Apr 23, 2026 +1
They're essentially the same to him.
1
Dominarion Apr 23, 2026 +15
Said king had to come to Canada to make a speech about defending Canada's sovereignty a year ago. His speech was a barely veiled diss on Trump. I'm not sure he's keen to go to Washington.
15
LittleSchwein1234 Apr 23, 2026 +17
I don't think the King is a huge Trump fan. King Charles is an environmentalist, Canada's head of state, and believes in democracy and rule of law.
17
Dominarion Apr 23, 2026 +11
And surprisingly, for a royal, he has a thing for underdogs. He's the only former Prince of Wales who cared about Wales in the last few centuries.
11
Maeran Apr 23, 2026 -1
An environmentalist who is popular with the Sauds
-1
noir_lord Apr 23, 2026 +2
> I'm not sure he's keen to go to Washington. Privately I’m sure he’s not but that’s the deal, Royals go where the government “requests”, the Royals have shook hands with butchers many times over the decades. They are a diplomatic tool abroad, I’m pretty sure Charles doesn’t want to go anywhere near trump because it’s absolutely going to draw more attention back to all the Andrew shit.
2
YourAutoModsSucks Apr 24, 2026 +1
The kings speech wasn't even written by himself, he read out a speech prepared by the Canadian Government. The situation is kind of weird - I wouldn't like speaking someone else's words, but he had to because of weird diplomatic/historical reasons/power dynamics.
1
Dominarion Apr 24, 2026 +3
Of course. It is even more complex than that. He have absolutely no authority in Canada, he's entirely figurative. The monarchy is kept in Canada because re-opening the Constitution to remove it would be a nightmare. On the other hand, he's not a puppet either. These things are negociated. The speech is vetted and approved by the King's "team". Just setting the calendar of the visit is a power play. These things are studied and planned for maximum impact. Two last things to consider, this was a golden opportunity for Charles to "pad more prestige points" in Canada. He read the speech the Canadian government prepared for him, but he did it with more intensity than anybody expected. The other thing is that the other comments surrounding the speech were his to make and, contrarily to the bland soup the Royals usually offer, he came out strong and emotional. Look, I'm a Canadian-Quebecer republican (in the sense I want to abolish the monarchy). For historical and political reasons, I have no affection for the British Crown. However, I try to be honest and not partisan, and he did us a solid there. I'm also quite jaded and cynical in general and I was moved. I mean, he made a part of his speech in a solid french, better than a lot of our own politicians, he even made his french sound more Quebecois than France French. He's a devious old weasel, the b******, lol.
3
YourAutoModsSucks Apr 24, 2026 +2
Yes, it's very weird. Similarly as an Australian we have the same kind of arrangement. We're left alone mostly, but occasionally get reminded we have a monarch who is separately and jointly king of a whole bunch of places collectively known as 'The Commonwealth'. He does seem to try and do the right thing, but is still far removed from being able to conceive the lives of his 'ordinary' citizens. I think is decent at heart, and grew up in a mess of a very opiniated and powerful family... The USA lost the plot when their supreme court ruled the president could be beyond the law under some circumstances, and that was whilst Biden was still president. The whole point of the founding of the US and its laws were trying to avoid the very circumstances they're now experiencing.
2
Burius81 Apr 23, 2026 +9
I don't think Dementia Don understands that the King isn't actually the leader of the UK.
9
caitnicrun Apr 23, 2026 +3
Would 100% believe that.
3
ElTejon_TheDestroyer Apr 23, 2026 +22
Then I say cancel it. In the UK we don’t want a relationship with a country that tries to tell us what the f*** we can and can’t do. Come back after you’ve sorted yourselves out and this dickhead is out of the picture.
22
Ben-D-Beast Apr 23, 2026 +5
That’s simply not practical, regardless of how broken the US is, it is still the foremost global power and we are largely dependent on them in many areas. Decoupling from the US will take time, until then playing around Trump’s ego is the best strategy.
5
eggyal Apr 23, 2026 +1
> it is still the foremost global power Trump is doing his very best to change that. Give it a few more weeks, and I'm not sure this'll be true.
1
Calm_Chemist_4952 Apr 23, 2026 +8
This is a public service announcement: Trump has no credibility. Unless there is alternative independent reliable confirming sources, his words should be assumed to be fabricated. Stop repeating his lies. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
8
Bartimaeleus Apr 23, 2026 +5
Does he think meeting the British King legitimise him as a Monarch or something? He seems to have this obsession with monarchs of other countries
5
ScottyBoneman Apr 23, 2026 +5
It's funny that people haven't touched on the key message here. By 'repair relations with the UK' he means him forgiving you.
5
Imperial_Bouncer Apr 23, 2026 +5
BBC King?
5
jupiterkansas Apr 23, 2026 +3
Yeah, I paused for a while on that one too. And now I want to see the BBC KIng.
3
OddDot724 Apr 23, 2026 +1
After reading the evidence against Harvey wienstiens junk.... I'll pass on random bbc kings for a while.
1
government_not_ok Apr 23, 2026 +1
Ayooo! 
1
CowCompetitive5667 Apr 23, 2026 +4
The Emperor's New Clothes
4
Idiot_Savant_13 Apr 23, 2026 +3
For *how long*? Bone Spurs ain't renowned for enduring loyalty, so is the trip really worth the gas?
3
Illustrious-Job-6390 Apr 23, 2026 +3
A new president would do that too 
3
One_Handed_Typing Apr 23, 2026 +3
Trump usually has good things to say about Charles. I think there's a 1000% chance Andrew has dirt on Trump that he's given to Charles, and Trump knows it.
3
KingAso88 Apr 23, 2026 +6
Kings brother is a pedo and needs to go to jail. Only way to change my opinion on the royals
6
TruthSeeker1801 Apr 23, 2026 +2
Something I'm sure he is (privately) very supportive of, they have hated each other for decades even before Andrew was exposed. As it stands the King has done everything that is in his power regarding Andrew, anything more has to come from the government which also can't do much since there isn't enough evidence to prosecute and most of his crimes weren't under British jurisdiction. He is still under official investigation and the government is trying to get access to relevant information in the Epstein files but have thus far been denied.
2
Standard_Program7042 Apr 23, 2026 +6
I wonder if he thinks his close buddy Andrew is holding it and Jeff will be there and it will be like old island times.. He's basically functioning like a stroke victim so it wouldnt surprise me.
6
Sea_Awareness150 Apr 23, 2026 +2
Not for me it can’t. Over america and definitely over trump. Would not trust the septics not to do this all over again.
2
RichardThund3r Apr 23, 2026 +2
Whose BBC is he talking to?
2
IngloriousMustards Apr 23, 2026 +2
Who broke the relationship in the first place? WHO BROKE THE RELATIONSHIP IN THE FIRST PLACE?!?
2
0rwellsWarning Apr 23, 2026 +2
Will literally do this only to be able to say that a King came to pay him respects
2
Justmmmoore Apr 23, 2026 +2
Only if the king is a complete fool.
2
cyberkine Apr 23, 2026 +2
We'll see how far the relationship is repaired after King Chuck tells Trump he needs to support Ukraine more and lean on Putin to see reason.
2
scarab1001 Apr 23, 2026 +2
Not from the UKs point of view.
2
ventin Apr 23, 2026 +2
So he could be detained and deported by ICE
2
Varnigma Apr 23, 2026 +2
Why even come here? Just snub him. As an American I'd support that 100%.
2
OldLondon Apr 23, 2026 +2
No it won’t a shit ton of Americans are complicit in this bullshit extravaganza 
2
jabbytabby Apr 24, 2026 +2
It gives a new meaning to "Close your eyes and think of England."
2
RoosterBurns Apr 24, 2026 +2
Only if he meets Trump the same way Truss met the Queen
2
cardew-vascular Apr 23, 2026 +1
It could help Canada. Trumps attitude shifts with Canada everytime he talks to the king, so this could help us when it comes to the review of our free trade agreement. It's probably going to do shit all for the UK/US relationship but it could help get the US to back down on some of their rhetoric with Canada.
1
Iamarealbouy Apr 23, 2026 +1
The mad king wants the old king to come and kiss his ring.
1
1_g0round Apr 23, 2026 +1
yeah thanks for f****** it up to begin with
1
-DeadpooI- Apr 23, 2026 +1
If the king of England assassinates the president of the United States what side would Gerrard Butler be on in the ensuing 90 minutes of action?
1
Vinegarinmyeye Apr 23, 2026 +3
I had this hypothetical on my mind when they announced this visit too (without the Gerrard Butler bit). Charlie walks into the oval office, draws a sword and decapitates Trump... What happens next? There'd be some VERY pissed off Americans, but the rest of the world would be cheering. (Including a fair number of non-pissed-off Americans I'd imagine).
3
chodgson625 Apr 23, 2026 +1
Let’s all imagine for a moment that Chuck The Hippy talks Trump into an early retirement on a Scottish golf course. The royals are trained to at least attempt diplomatic coups like this, let’s just hope for the sake of the world that actually happens (No I don’t think it will either)
1
Counterpoint-4 Apr 23, 2026 +1
The poor king! Being civil to a senile child rapist egged on by his cabinet of yes men is more than I could do. Queen Elizabeth must have given him strong fortitude genes!
1
BlueHeartbeat Apr 23, 2026 +1
He's such a simple guy, it's actually incredible how many people read deep strategies into what he does.
1
CleverDad Apr 23, 2026 +1
By "relationship" I assume he means his own personal opinions.
1
Only_Dragonfruit_117 Apr 23, 2026 +1
King Charles, call in a sick day.
1
Mushroom_Tip Apr 23, 2026 +1
He has met Andrew many times. Maybe go see your good friend Andrew, Donald. Reminisce about old times raping girls.
1
DFWPunk Apr 23, 2026 +1
I honestly believe he thinks Charles is a king in the traditional sense rather than essentially holding a cerimonial role with no true power.
1
government_not_ok Apr 23, 2026 +1
I’m no fan of the king, but pls keep JD Vance away from him. 
1
Demonofthedark1313 Apr 23, 2026 +1
Two men with low morals who just couldn't be fauthful to their wives, yet they both refer to themselves as Christians.
1
Puzzled-Maize-2241 Apr 23, 2026 +1
What kind of award or trophy does the king need to give trump for that to happen?
1
crookdmouth Apr 23, 2026 +1
Don't do it Charles!
1
notthesethings Apr 23, 2026 +1
Who’s the current big black c*** King? I assume Lexington Steele has retired.
1
Significant-Ad1890 Apr 24, 2026 +1
With Trumps H****** Dance, which is his natural instinct, BBC wouldn't be any surprise to most of us. 
1
epi_glowworm Apr 24, 2026 +1
I’d rather see Agent Orange attend Questions Time.
1
Partiallyfermented Apr 24, 2026 +1
Bullshit. He'll savour the visit and then it's back to slagging off Starmer.
1
graeuk Apr 24, 2026 +1
might work for a week then he will just go right back to making threats. waste of diplomatic effort.
1
rockerscott Apr 25, 2026 +1
Birds of a pedo flock together.
1
entity21 Apr 25, 2026 +1
What if we don't want it fixed? What if we don't want to be associated with the embarrassment that is the USA until they put competent people in charge again?
1
Moontoya Apr 23, 2026
A would be king cosying up to an actual Monarch  Both have plenty of experience with infidelity  One talks to plants, ones about as smart as your average plant
0
← Back to Board