· 176 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Mar 27, 2026 at 10:38 AM

Trump’s horrors keep accumulating. We need the No Kings protests more than ever

Posted by zsreport


Trump’s horrors keep accumulating. We need the No Kings protests more than ever | Moira Donegan
the Guardian
Trump’s horrors keep accumulating. We need the No Kings protests more than ever | Moira Donegan
Thousands of No Kings events will be fueled by anger over ICE violence, the Epstein files released and a war in Iran. These protests have power

🚩 Report this post

176 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
specqq Mar 27, 2026 +103
it has been mathematically proven that no list of all of the horrible things he's done can ever be complete.
103
yrotsihfoedisgnorw Mar 27, 2026 +10
Time is going to pass. The list is going to grow.
10
Miles_the_AuDHDer Mar 27, 2026 +7
It's also been proven that a single half day of protesting every few months achieves absolutely nothing and that the politicians being protested against will completely ignore them. We need to be protesting daily in the millions for as long as it takes. Anything less and it's all meaningless. Or even better, a nationwide strike.
7
williammunnyjr Mar 27, 2026 +3
This! I’m not doing the protests because it’s stupid. A nationwide strike for a few days!!! Now we be talking. We need some rich mofos to setup a fund for folks at a certain income level to draw from. Let’s goooooo!!!!!
3
omniwombatius Mar 27, 2026 +4
At each of these events, there are people with tables and booths set up who will tell you exactly what they are doing in all the time between protests, and would you like to help volunteer with them? There are a lot of people doing a lot of work every day. The protests are a necessary stepping stone to get to the general strike.
4
witchgrove Mar 27, 2026 +210
do we? things have only gotten demonstrably worse since the last no kings 'protest', the largest assembly in US history. these no kings events seem to just act as a tension release valve. people stand with a sign for a couple hours (as long as permits allow) and then go home. and then things get worse. these are not protests. we need a national strike.
210
RenideoS Mar 27, 2026 +27
It's a fair comment, real protest movements in other countries tend to be sustained and disruptive. The US is considered by most to be fairly culturally un-used to real protest movements in the modern era. But of course, American citizens are also in a state of serious economic precarity. Which makes it hard for them, and they have never reached the tipping point where it felt like they had nothing to lose. Personally I also think the whole idea is a bit silly, it appeals to US mythological self-conception. King George had far less power than Trump has, Parliament made most of the decisions at the time of the war, and the presidency was always set up to be a constitutionally constrained King, but the King was already constitutionally constrained by then, and the constraints on the president were never all that strong. What the US needs is a lot of constitutional amendments to create independence in institutions, including the judiciary, the DoJ, to remove the pardon power, etc. Might not be a slogan, but then, I'm not sure shouting we hate trump is going to resolve anything either.
27
phyneas Mar 27, 2026 +6
> But of course, American citizens are also in a state of serious economic precarity. Which makes it hard for them, and they have never reached the tipping point where it felt like they had nothing to lose. I suspect those in power are actively trying to keep that balance in place, as well; that's really the key to prevent mass uprisings. If people are secure and don't think they'd be risking much by engaging in sustained protesting (e.g. because they have strong social safety nets and public healthcare and can't be fired from their jobs on a whim), they will protest. If people think they have nothing left to lose, they will riot. If, on the other hand, they *do* have something to lose and they fear that there's a real risk they'll lose it by engaging in sustained protests, then they'll be quiet and won't cause trouble.
6
_DapperDanMan- Mar 27, 2026 +1
That's exactly it. Which is why we all have phones.
1
UnquestionabIe Mar 27, 2026 +9
Saw someone say it earlier and fully agree; it isn't a protest as nothing is really being disrupted, it's a rally. People who are upset are basically having a little picnic, showing off their cute little signs, and comforting each other about the misery we're all living in. Personally I think it's mixture of good and bad aspects. Good on that it does get some people more motivated and willing to reach out to help the community along with fighting in more effective ways. Bad in that some will just take it as "well did my part, all should be well eventually". And of course the most negative part being baked into our culture in that none of this changes or goes aways without a massive change in the system. Trump could explode on stage and we can all witness his soul being dragged to Hell. Still doesn't fix any of the issues we're dealing with. The bare minimum is stripping the entire GOP of any power, probably should imprison much of it as well. Following that with going after the various organizations and foundations writing up their plans for treason. After that comes the oligarchy/corporations and we still wouldn't be close to what needs to be done... Point being the No Kings stuff is less than a single percentage point of what adds up to real change. It's an alright starting point, needs a more focused message and future plans for starters, but we're all going to need to work a lot harder than taking a weekend every couple of months to direct our anger at Trump collectively.
9
crystal_castles Mar 27, 2026 +35
There's an important role for lawnchair protests, but i feel like the invasion of Kharg once markets close will be the beginning of the end. Gas lines by the summer
35
aircooledJenkins Mar 27, 2026 +60
They demonstrate that there are people out there who disagree with the current administration. It is buoying for people who are isolated and don't see that in their normal life. The size of the protests can give pause to people who are in the edge. Sure, they're not violent and flashy and they don't end with a head on a pike, but they are necessary.
60
cyborgedbacon Mar 27, 2026 +24
I'm happy the protests are showing that a lot of us don't agree with this Administration (and showing the rest of the World this country still has sane people left), but the protests are just not enough. To make it felt throughout the country, it needs to be done on a weekday where it halts all business. Unless the country/Economy shuts down for just a day only then will it finally cause a change from those in the Government. Otherwise we either rely on the mid terms (without meddling from Trump's goons), or the service members follow through with their sworn oaths to protect this country and it's citizens from the threats currently in the White House.
24
FrayCrown Mar 27, 2026 +48
...no one is saying protests should be violent. But these big protests, that have permits and don't actually disrupt anything, are...mostly therapy sessions for white liberals. Which is fine. But peaceful demonstrations only work if your opponent has a conscience. No Kings has already broken protest records, and nothing changed. Same for the Women's March.
48
Bonesnapcall Mar 27, 2026 +30
Yup. I get downvoted for saying this in every protest thread: Protests that are easy to ignore are easily ignored.
30
AlphaGoldblum Mar 27, 2026 +7
I've also been excoriated before for pointing out that we don't want to lose our creature comforts. I'm not saying we don't want change, but we want it in way that doesn't disrupt our craft beer night. We want Trump sent to prison and for a Patagonia sale to happen the next day.  But even if Trump doesn't actually get sent to prison, we'll still be at Patagonia.
7
ashedmypanties Mar 27, 2026 +2
Our comforts, they come with a price tag.
2
FrayCrown Mar 27, 2026 +19
Yeah, you can't fight fascist, genocidal monsters with the power of friendship and brunch.
19
come_on_seth Mar 27, 2026 +1
Let me take on all the apathetic voices in this thread. Apathy is a mental illness that can be offset by reminders of solidarity and victories. Protests are the result of organizations working together. This is both a learning curve and a message to power. Participants are encouraged and inspired. Improvised spontaneous relationships increase connections which creates strength. So far everything mentioned can be leveraged to the more assertive forms of protest like boycotts and general strikes. Proof of ROI can be seen in the blue tsunami that started a year ago with the special elections. Add to that the significant political victories with each TACO. Ask yourself,” Why is the SAVE ACT floundering?” Answer is the politicians are getting the message. Also, why are so many republicans retiring? Because the writing is on the wall. Every protest, not just No Kings , every special election victory is sending a message. Apathy kills democracy. If you are apathetic, get help. If you won’t get help, keep your sickness to yourself.
1
FrayCrown Mar 27, 2026 +3
Lol. To say that No Kings is responsible for legislative change is unfounded. Again, your cute, lawful protests do nothing. People in grassroots movements who are directly pressuring individuals are getting way more done. You can march all you want. That won't change the fact that our country is run by a fascist pedophile, and many powerful Dems are doing nothing. Or they're complicit, like Fetterman. By all means, have your white liberal group therapy session. If it makes you feel better and more connected or empowered, that's awesome. But don't make up facts. Your little crusade against "apathy" is similarly pointless. You're not gonna close ICE detention centers because you went to a march that didn't shut anything down. Calling anyone who thinks differently than you 'apathetic' is hypocritical. Activism that's different than your is still valid. I guarantee you haven't spent the time I have in sexual reproductive health clinics, helping patients. To me, you seem apathetic, as your march will do absolutely jack shit for them.
3
UnquestionabIe Mar 27, 2026 +4
Thank you. It is not apathetic to point out this rally (because it is isn't a protest) is mostly a feel good exercise to let the lesser engaged complay as protesters. I've seen more disruptive produce sales at the grocery store. That isn't saying violence or vandalism is required but to make any sort of serious impact requires people and businesses to be forced into awareness, even if it's just pissing them off because it gets in the way of the usual day to day. If some use it as a starting point to look towards reaching out and furthering the cause great but on it's own it's accomplished nothing. Real change is things like you said you're doing, volunteering in the community and helping our fellow human beings with material support (even if it's just being present to be back up for others).
4
thegreatlizard99 Mar 27, 2026 +4
They aren’t needed if they don’t lead to action.
4
rocksoffjagger Mar 27, 2026 +2
A protest with no list of demands is meaningless theater. There's a reason no one hears about No Kings for like 3 months between events. There is no grassroots organizing or local chapters. There's no mechanism for the people who participate to have a voice in what the protests will be about. It's all just astroturfed by billionaires who want to prevent this anger from spilling out into something that affects actual societal change. Controlled opposition.
2
baitnnswitch Mar 27, 2026 +1
There is absolutely grassroots organizing happening at these protests. There are always folks with tables and clipboards trying to get folks signed up for mutual aid/DSA/activist groups. Have you actually been to one?
1
Gibonius Mar 27, 2026 +1
> The size of the protests can give pause to people who are in the edge. Also our institutions. A lot of companies and elite institutions gave in to Trump in the early stages of his administration because it didn't seem like there was any meaningful resistance. Having tens of millions of people out in the street demonstrating against Trump gives all those institutions incentive to not just cave when Trump pressures them.
1
Bahamabanana Mar 27, 2026 +1
They don't work! That's the gist of it. If anything, I agree that they're delusional. They're just theatrics that let the ruling class pretend they give a shit while they make everything worse, or maybe just call it fake news and paid shills and call it a day. If there's no consequence, it doesn't matter. It doesn't have to be violence, a strike would do fine, it just has to be felt by *all*
1
Hardass_McBadCop Mar 27, 2026 +2
Additionally, it visually shows those in power how many are against their policies. While many won't care, the support of some . . . Less redhat Republican politicans will be given pause.
2
AbsolutelyHorrendous Mar 27, 2026 +7
I mean, respectfully though, the No Kings protests draw in millions of those who don't support Trump's policies... but ten times as many people literally voted for him at the last election. Ultimately when the expression of anger is just people giving up their weekend, rather than going on strike or something truly disruptive, its too easy to disregard the protests as just middle class liberals venting in public
7
aircooledJenkins Mar 27, 2026 +5
I've maintained that these protests, and the country in general, have remained peaceful because Republican and the Trump Administration's policies haven't started hurting enough yet. These gas prices are certainly getting previously disconnected people to notice. If food and goods prices spike suddenly, that will be another one. The DHS going a month without pay *should* (in my opinion) make every single person affected by that shutdown vote against GOP politicians. I'm rambling. The protests will remain peaceful because it's not hurting enough yet. There will be a tipping point when 70% of Republicans can no longer deny that Trump, the GOP, and the Epstein class are directly responsible for their lives being so much more difficult. (There will always be roughly 30% that will never ever admit it.)
5
Unable_Technology935 Mar 28, 2026 +1
Yep. I'm surrounded by them in Indiana. I'm thinking the shit is about to hit the fan this summer. I'm hoping we shut down Valparaiso Indiana tomorrow. Lots of Republicans will not be happy.
1
Chillers Mar 27, 2026 +7
Yep huge strikes are needed. Protests only work On a government that cares about free speech.
7
TemporaryUser10 Mar 27, 2026 +6
It's an opportunity to meet like-minded people to build networks, and an opportunity to show how your local community is feeling without the filter of social media.  We also need a national strike
6
AbsolutelyHorrendous Mar 27, 2026 +3
Yeah its all well and good having these mass protests, but with no recognizable leadership and no actual demands, its too easy for the government to just ignore them and say 'well, we don't even know what they want'. I saw an article that was telling people not to forget what the last No Kings protests achieved, which basically amounted to... the protest itself, being the achievement. There are some people for whom protesting is actually a victory, rather than a means to an end, which is why expressing anger is given almost equal weight to effecting actual change, even though the former arguably achieves next to nothing
3
Interesting-Rip-8717 Mar 27, 2026 +15
They are a good place to start and meet people and learn how to get more politically active.
15
baitnnswitch Mar 27, 2026 +6
Yup. There are usually sign-up tables for those thinking about doing more than just protesting.
6
AbsolutelyHorrendous Mar 27, 2026 +6
Okay, and what has any of that actually achieved though? Part of the problem is, protesting isn't being seen as a means to an end, but as an achievement in itself. All these people who are meeting up and learning to get more politically active, okay what does that actually mean in practise?
6
AlphaGoldblum Mar 27, 2026 +10
>All these people who are meeting up and learning to get more politically active, okay what does that actually mean in practise? Exactly. The most crucial aspect of Civil Rights was the backbone of community support that existed for the protestors. A protestor could go out and put their economic position at risk because they knew the community *would not let them starve*. The community had bail funds ready to go, an extra room in their house, an open kitchen. Not everyone involved in the movement was marching out in the streets, but the protests would not have been possible if not for the community waiting with an open door and a warm meal once the protests were done for the day.  No Kings doesn't seem interested in building a universal protesting safety-net to allow for the next step. So far, mutual aid has been localized to a handful of communities - which is fantastic, but paltry when you look at the numbers involved in the protests. And it's clearly not enough, as people immediately pivot to the fear that "we can't afford to lose our jobs". The idea of mutual aid doesn't even materialize for us and we don't question why, despite marching side by side with millions of people.
10
AbsolutelyHorrendous Mar 27, 2026 +1
Its a problem with it being so decentralised by design. There's no element of 'okay, so where do we go from here, and how do we do it', even the political networking element makes it almost feel more like a social occasion for some people
1
t8rt0t00 Mar 27, 2026 +8
I was just about to say, these no kings protests have been really ineffective. They're only in areas already predominantly blue and not changing the opinions of anyone outside of these bubbles. The opinions of the administration have only hardened in response to them And while these events are organized well, they don't have any action behind them. You're totally right, we need real protesting. Either getting right up in the face of the administration (how many people can fit in DC?) or launch a nationwide strike
8
Btmama Mar 27, 2026 +3
In my town it’s just a huge social gathering with a bunch of wine moms who held poster making parties the night before. They walk around and congratulate each other on how witty they are and plaster pictures all over Instagram. They talk about how scared they are for their 401Ks and how tuition at their kids private school might go up. Then they run up to the cops to thank them and disperse into the pricey restaurants and bars to feel like they did something. I can’t bring myself to go to another one. They are performative bullshit.
3
Faustrolled Mar 27, 2026 +2
I could see why it wouldn't go with your h******* lifestyle that is all about change
2
P1xelHunter78 Mar 27, 2026 +8
While I agree the “no Kings” protests are just mostly performative (although they do serve a purpose to galvanize support against the administration), with a mid term looming our best bet is to vote these ghouls out. A general strike will only serve to punish a lot of the American work force. With so many Americans without any savings, the majority of them not in a union and a poor labor market employers will just fire workers who don’t show up. The best way to make sure in the future we can strike is vote out the GOP and join a labor union. Wanna start making an impact now? Ask a union how you can start a campaign.
8
witchgrove Mar 27, 2026 +12
This is not me saying not to vote. We will not vote our way out of fascism. We may vote our way out of current GOP leaders, but the fascist rot in our government is not exclusive to the GOP. The system didn't break, our system has always been broken and has always been anti-citizen. The institutions that have failed and have been captured will not magically become strong and good once current GOP leadership is gone.
12
P1xelHunter78 Mar 27, 2026 +7
And we can’t get out of fascism in the unemployment line either. You made a bad take, and told Americans to throw away their jobs by not understanding the reasons why a general strike is more or less prevented in America, especially with the economy collapsed. If anything mass unemployment breeds fascism. If you can strike do so if you wish, but a mass strike just isn’t feasible. We still have the vote.
7
blazesquall Mar 27, 2026 +11
If we wait until the working class has comfortable savings and robust mutual aid networks to take action, we will literally never take action. The ruling class built the treadmill specifically so we can't afford to step off it. Voting for short-term harm reduction is one thing.. but fascism and institutional rot don't politely wait for us to slowly build union density over the next few decades. We cannot vote our way out of captured institutions. History shows us that the state only makes massive concessions when they are absolutely forced to, through immense, disruptive sacrifice that grinds commerce to a halt.
11
P1xelHunter78 Mar 27, 2026 +3
And the only way to reform the institution is voting for candidates that aren’t fascist. It’s much harder to do that from a bread line. Starting a union is something everyone can do right now. Voting in the mid terms is something we can do right now. If you can strike, strike, but don’t expect a mass strike. It’s not feasible at this point in time. In my opinion the *only* way to enable such mass striking is to set up robust safety nets and workers rights. That doesn’t just happen by holding signs, it takes votes.
3
blazesquall Mar 27, 2026 +5
This is a cyclical argument: *We need safety nets to strike, so we must vote for politicians to give us safety nets, so we can eventually strike against the people funding those politicians.* The idea that we can vote our way into having the safety nets required to strike completely ignores the last fifty years of political history. We are several decades into having those exact safety nets systematically dismantled by the very same political class you are hoping will save us.. bipartisan consensus has gutted welfare, eroded labor protections, actively broken strikes the moment they actually threaten capital, etc. Politicians who rely on corporate donors to win elections are never going to willingly legislate the infrastructure required for the working class to effectively hold that same capital hostage. The labor rights we do have (the weekend, the 8.hour day, the original Wagner Act) weren't gifted to us because we voted for the right people in a midterm. They were concessions forced by mass, militant, and often illegal strikes that terrified the establishment into action. Telling people to wait for captured politicians to make striking 'safe' is just confirming you're never going to do it.
5
bIackphillip Mar 27, 2026 +1
Social safety nets would be nice, yes. But absent those, you HAVE to have a strike fund to support the workers so them and their families don't starve. And to have a strike fund, you HAVE to have a union. You need an organized workplace. That's step one. Without that, or at least without mutual aid networks that can support strikers who don't have an established union and/or social safety net... you have nothing.  Certain industries, also, just wouldn't really effectively pressure Washington if they went on strike. I'm a transcriptionist for clients mostly in the financial industry. My job is not actually essential. If my office went on strike, the only people it would affect are our clients at Merrill Lynch etc. But they can always just replace us with voice recognition software (just don't tell them that).
1
bIackphillip Mar 27, 2026 +2
Thank you. People (both our Fellow Americans and folks in other countries too) have no idea how unfeasible mass labor movements are here, and they just refuse to engage with our reasons why. Part of the challenge is that a *lot* of folks here are just *completely* ignorant about collective action in The States. A short primer on past movements during the 20th century would go a long way, but they don't teach us that shit in school. Most Americans just think the Black Civil Rights movement was just a bunch of marches, some sit-ins, some boycotts... but they have no idea how any of it actually worked. And if you don't know that, you can't really hope to replicate it -- much less tweak it to apply to your goals and the material realities of your present situation. If that makes sense.  Also, most of us don't live in states with a long history of organized labor, so we have to build the infrastructure from the ground up. That takes *time*. And I don't know about you, but I don't even work in an industry that would make much of an impact if my office went on strike. Not everyone does.
2
IrrelevantLeprechaun Mar 27, 2026 +2
And how do you suggest we afford a strike? Most of us live paycheck to paycheck. We miss even a couple days of work and it can mean being unable to make ends meet at the end of the month. Bills go unpaid, mortgages falter, we lose our healthcare, homes and entire livelihoods. So say we do it anyway. What good is a strike when it's populated by homeless, jobless starving participants? What good is a strike when all our jobs just get refilled within a week by other job seekers? Our society simply isn't structured for strikes. We have to commit to peaceful protest because it's the best tool we have.
2
rocksoffjagger Mar 27, 2026 +3
Thank you. These events are controlled opposition. They have no list of demands, there's no attempt to turn the individual actions into organization through meetings or local chapters that work in between major events, and they're all funded by dark money. It's opposition theater meant to distract angry but minimally engaged moderates who might otherwise join more effective, more radical protests if they weren't coralled into something toothless and ineffective.
3
BlondeBorednBaked Mar 27, 2026 +1
Trump doesn’t like when people protest. It scares him, even if it is peaceful. If it gets under his skin it’s worth it to me to show up. It’s a reflection of your character if you don’t want to protest the horrible things happening.
1
Mr-A-1991 Mar 28, 2026 +1
Most nations would have arrived at the "civil war" phase by now. America doesn't seem to want freedom very much.
1
Missingthefinals Mar 28, 2026 +1
Protesting for half a day every couple of months does f*** all Look at what South Korea did when their multiple presidents did shit wrong. Non stop protests with millions in the streets The US are to apathetic to do anything about their country falling into fascism
1
Equivalent-Excuse-80 Mar 27, 2026 +1
This is a literal demonstration. It’s demonstrates our mass opposition while we remain polite. It demonstrates that we will always have the power and soon we will stop demonstrating how we yield it peacefully. We are trying to save democratic systems, not destroy them. Democratic change happens legally; slowly. Breaking shit is just going to lead to another fascistic regime.
1
witchgrove Mar 27, 2026 +1
Courts are captured. Good luck following that legal process through to its end. Our system of democracy is a farce, our representatives serve only capitalism and not the constituency.
1
RizzardOfOz76 Mar 27, 2026 +73
I’m seeing comment after comment and post after post about how supposedly ineffective No Kings is. So let’s talk about what the protests are accomplishing and why they’re worthwhile. First of all, protests serve as an “entry point” for people to practice the “muscle” of political engagement and resistance. The vast, vast majority of Americans have never engaged in any act of political resistance whatsoever. Attending one is new and maybe even a little scary for a lot of folks. It’s just like weight-lifting. You can’t go into the gym after never working out in your life and immediately bench your body weight. You have to work up to it. If you think the protests don’t do enough and (for example) civil disobedience is necessary, how do you think people are going to do anything else if they’re not even used to going to peaceful, pre-planned, family-friendly marches/protests? Most people cannot go from 0-60 right away. Secondly, researchers from Harvard have found that “Nonviolent protests are twice as likely to succeed as armed conflicts – and those engaging a threshold of 3.5% of the population have never failed to bring about change.” Last year, a little over 2% of the US population attended a No Kings protest - and this year is expected to be bigger (in fact, it’s projected to be the largest protest in US history). The theorized mechanism behind this is interesting, and I encourage you to read further about it. Sources: https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20190513-it-only-takes-35-of-people-to-change-the-world https://www.nonviolent-conflict.org/resource/success-nonviolent-civil-resistance/ https://cup.columbia.edu/book/why-civil-resistance-works/9780231156820/ Third, many people who oppose this administration feel isolated and disempowered. The protests provide a simple and easy way for them to meet other like-minded folks, again serving as a jumping-off post for getting more involved in many other possible ways. Fourth, it’s not about him, it’s about US - us exercising our rights to assemble and protest the government (which the founders thought important enough to put in the first dang amendment!), gathering, networking, planning. It doesn’t matter if Trump Pooh-poohs them. What matters is that We The People get organized to oppose this regime effectively. That starts with simple, baby-steps actions and with coming together. Fifth, there’s a weird argument I’ve seen that people should do different things instead of attend a No Kings protest. But that’s a false dichotomy. You can do plenty of other things AND go to one of these. Finally, the idea that “one day won’t do anything” — well, yeah. No shit, Sherlock. One day wasn’t enough for the US civil rights movement of the 60s, either. Or the (ongoing) fight for LGBTQ rights. This shit takes time. Non-violent resistance is a tough row to hoe. But it does work. (See also: Ghandi, the US protests against the war in Vietnam, the Rose Revolution.) You know what doesn’t work? Sitting on the couch yelling at other people about not taking your personal preferred action. That’s a real Russian Bot move…pretty cringe. One of the world’s preeminent scholars on fascism, Timothy Snyder, posted that he’s going to No Kings III, and laid out why it is important in his substack: https://snyder.substack.com/p/no-kings-freedom Thanks for coming to my Ted Talk.
73
bungpeice Mar 27, 2026 +23
Nonviolent protests that succeed include a heavy dose of civil disobedience. That's is the difference between now and eras like the civil rights, suffrage, or labor struggle
23
AbsolutelyHorrendous Mar 27, 2026 +5
And they also involve at least some recognisable leaders and aims, too. You need someone who can sit around a table, express what the protest is actually standing for, who can tell their representatives what change the movement is fighting for. Deliberately fostering a movement with no aims and no leadership just so you can maximise numbers reads more like they're more interested in making headlines and breaking records, than actually bringing about real change. How can a movement that stands for nothing achieve anything?
5
Due_Bluebird3562 Mar 27, 2026 +1
>Nonviolent protests that succeed include a heavy dose of civil disobedience. That's is the difference between now and eras like the civil rights, suffrage, or labor struggle This is what people don't seem to comprehend. Calling No Kings a protest despite it lacking basically every key component of an effective non-violent protest is ridiculous. The entire point of a protest is to disrupt the status quo. No Kings is a social gathering. Which isn't a bad thing... it's just not remotely as useful as a "protest" with literally millions of people should be. Doesn't help that these No Kings events only happen every few months or so either.
1
Calvin_Ball_86 Mar 27, 2026 +11
Targeted "protests" against Trump's and his cronys businesses are required to cause any real concern. Trump said he didn't care about the last protest and his resulting actions showed the protests accomplished little. But if they were backed by threat of losses to his business interests, then I think we'd see change. 
11
Bosfordjd Mar 27, 2026 +7
ahh yes resources about non-violence referencing US civil rights....that shit was not non-violent lol. It required a lot of violence, and also required armed civil rights groups. There has been no successful non-violent protest in US history. Literally None. Everyone that's accomplished something long-term has involved significant violence. All of these required consistency as well, which this is not, and that's the single biggest issue. All it's doing is creating a huge economic event in the area and perpetuating the very capitalist system that's causing the problem. It's completely asinine.
7
AbsolutelyHorrendous Mar 27, 2026 +4
You have to have the carrot and the stick for it to work. The stick doesn't have to necessarily be violent, but it does have to actually be disruptive At the moment its kind of just 'If you refuse to listen to us, well... I guess we'll ask again in a few weeks'
4
Iowa_Dave Mar 27, 2026 +7
I've been to every Protest/rally I could get to. I feel it's important to get off the damn couch when things matter. People who depend on votes for a living need to see large groups of people saying at the most basic level "I'm not OK with what is going on here". Photos and videos of huge turnouts are likely as effective as the political advertising out there. It's US. WE are the ones we've been waiting for to show up and fix things.
7
aircooledJenkins Mar 27, 2026 +8
Standing in a crowd and yelling for an afternoon every few months is almost the least we can do, and we damn well better be doing it. I've said for years I wish I could do more, so if I'm not at least doing this, I'm being an ass. I also don't want to tell my kids and grand kids "While Republicans raped the country, I hid in a hole." In 2020 I signed up to be an election polling place worker and have participated in every primary and general election since. It has been gratifying to feel like a small part of the process that makes the country work. (I've also learned a bit about the security and safeguards Montana has in place to keep our elections legit.) It's maybe not much but without workers voting doesn't happen.
8
Maddkipz Mar 27, 2026 +4
Im gonna use one of my 3 wishes to retroactively have made Bernie president, see you on the new timeline
4
Faustrolled Mar 27, 2026 +5
He'd have been awful. He'd get nothing past the Congress and do a million worthless executive orders. He should have bothered talking to black leaders in the south
5
aircooledJenkins Mar 27, 2026 +6
Also consider going further back and stopping Roger Stone's malarkey in Florida so that Al Gore wins the presidency.
6
MoomenRider2012 Mar 27, 2026 +7
It would be more effective if all the people who attended these rallies stopped supporting the companies that directly support trump.
7
Tityfan808 Mar 27, 2026 +1
This this this. And treat every day that you can like a general strike even. Also, plaster stickers, posters, billboards, etc. all over the country mentioning Donny Dump’s corruption, pedophelia, you name it, and place it f****** EVERYWHERE! Make it look like a far right town plastered in everything MAGA but the opposite!!!
1
ridingpiggyback Mar 27, 2026 +5
In a very red county in a purple state, it is nice to know that there are people who are mad enough to gather. And, if passerby see it, they might see that they are not alone. I saw the crowd in October. I will be part of the crowd Saturday.
5
zsreport Mar 27, 2026 +15
A bit from the commentary: > It is a frequently lobbed criticism of No Kings, as it was of the Women’s Marches, that these sorts of vast public demonstrations of broad anti-Trump feeling suffer from being overly inclusive and insufficiently precise. And it is true that the No Kings marches have no demands, as such: they are more expressions of the passion and size of the anti-regime feeling in the United States than a meaningful program to leverage that feeling for specific political ends. > > But it is not true that the breadth of the coalition of the No Kings movement means that that coalition cannot be wielded in the service of more specific policy changes. In demonstrating the vastness of American popular discontent and the intensity of ill will toward the political right, the No Kings protests will show the human faces behind Trump’s disastrous approval rating; they will give politicians, ahead of the looming November midterms, a sense of the wisdom, or lack thereof, in following Trump’s political lead. In 2024, after Trump eked out a victory in the presidential election and won the popular vote for the first time, many commentators assumed that his return to power represented a dramatic and permanent cultural shift: that the culture wars were over, and that the right had won. But in reality, much of Trump’s support in 2024 was weak and noncommittal, his famous diehard fans less central to his support than their legend makes it seem. The No Kings protests are an opportunity to demonstrate – to politicians, to the media, and to America itself – that this country also contains large swaths of liberal and left-leaning people, people who dare to imagine that they matter as much to what this country is as the conservatives do.
15
Main-Cost2163 Mar 27, 2026 +9
Seriously. Every day its something new and worse. The sheer volume is the point—its meant to overwhelm us so we get numb. Dont get numb. Get loud.
9
Er3bus13 Mar 27, 2026 +3
If magats could read theyd be upset with you.
3
MysteriousSoup3819 Mar 27, 2026 +9
Future historians are gonna need a massive 10-part streaming docuseries just to cover the events of this month alone lmao. i am straight up tired of living through major historical events dude, just let me rest.
9
LongDukDongle Mar 27, 2026 +5
Start by changing the name to something like "No Despots..," or "No Fascism" or "No Pedophiles in the White House." "No Kings" is the dumbest possible name, like only the complicit opposition Democratic leadership consultation class could have come up with a name so stupid.
5
InevitableAvalanche Mar 27, 2026 +4
Need impeachment. Republicans have to worry about their souls at some point right?
4
Lonely_Noyaaa Mar 27, 2026 +11
Trump currently has the highest disapproval rating of any president at this point in their presidency this century.
11
Thunderclone_1 Mar 27, 2026 +5
Granted, this century only spans 26 years and 3 other guys as competition. Do we have data for Buchanan, reagan, Jackson, the great depression era presidents, Pierce, etc?
5
Narrow_Track9598 Mar 27, 2026 +1
I was born in the 80's. He's the least popular and shittiest one of my life so far
1
dcgradc Mar 27, 2026 +1
But still 80% with Republican whatever that means
1
Nyte_Knyght33 Mar 27, 2026 +6
No, we need a General strike. 
6
_recapitated Mar 27, 2026 +2
That would be something.
2
IrrelevantLeprechaun Mar 27, 2026 +4
And see YOU gonna pay my bills and my mortgage for me after a strike loses me my job? Are YOU going to provide my healthcare when I lose my employer provided insurance? We don't have the structures for a strike. It's simply not possible.
4
_recapitated Mar 27, 2026 +3
Nobody's making you do it.
3
Nyte_Knyght33 Mar 27, 2026 +2
If the strike is big enough there won't be enough people to run those companies that provide the things you are talking about. 
2
IrrelevantLeprechaun Mar 27, 2026 +2
Still doesn't solve the problem of our bills needing to be paid. You gonna cover that cost for us all by yourself?
2
Nyte_Knyght33 Mar 27, 2026 +5
It would if the people collecting your bills were participating in the strike. 
5
bIackphillip Mar 27, 2026 +2
Damn, you know what... that's actually a really good point. That's the kind of strategic thinking we need
2
Nyte_Knyght33 Mar 27, 2026 +1
With enough people, an effective general strike hits, it shuts down the entire country.  Minnesota did this to help get ICE out and that was just a state. 
1
Malice_Claymore Mar 27, 2026 +5
Yes. Going to stand around looking angry for 3 hours on a Saturday afternoon every once in awhile is definitely how you implement change 🙄
5
chatapokai Mar 27, 2026 +4
A march is totally going to solve everything, I’m sure they’ll see the people and think “hey we should fix the country” and it’ll all be sunshine and rainbows. Nothing is going to change unless it is forced. Otherwise it’s baseless pageantry. Start holding people accountable.
4
Pacific_Grim_ Mar 27, 2026 +17
Ah yes, the media calling for another pointless and polite protest that changes nothing. You’ll know you’re protesting correctly and hitting these pigs where it hurts when they fear your protest. Not when they’re praising it.
17
Calvin_Ball_86 Mar 27, 2026 +20
Remember how freaked out Trump got when folks decided to target Tesla dealerships? Yes, that was an effective tactic. 
20
Chief_Mischief Mar 27, 2026 +5
>Ah yes, the media calling for another pointless and polite protest that changes nothing Protests are highly visible temperature checks, but a widespread sustained anti-consumption movement and boycott of as many Trump donors/supporting orgs as possible would be the most effective peaceful means to fight back. What is ICE going to do, hold a gun to our heads to make sure we add a tip to the Walton family for a forced purchase of Trump-branded shoes or something?
5
rocksoffjagger Mar 27, 2026 +1
Boycotts would be better than the worthless no kings slop, but actual disruptive actions would be way more effective. Get the millions of No Kings protesters blocking major Trump-aligned corporations from doing business and watch how fast things change.
1
Faustrolled Mar 27, 2026 +1
Yeah, they'd just give them huge giveaways really. Make it so you could only spend ebt at Walmart
1
Aggravating_Sand352 Mar 27, 2026 +2
What they do is start a conversation for the people that witness these protests but I agree its bullshit. We are at a point where we need to literally stop going to work but no one wants to be the first one because no big corporation is going to sponsor your time off when trump is so vindictave against businesses. If we were a better educated country we would already have started a general strike
2
Cold_Cardiologist258 Mar 27, 2026 +6
honestly it's just exhausting how every single week feels like an entire decade of news tbh. people are clearly hitting their breaking point and these protests are pretty much the only outlet left when the system feels this unresponsive.
6
iownlotsofdoors Mar 27, 2026 +3
another f****** bot with the exact same typing pattern with an account made at the exact same time as all the other ones on political sublistnooks
3
Cirias Mar 27, 2026 +5
You guys needed to have held a general strike many months ago. It's getting way too late, irreversible damage around the world is being done. Protesting simply isn't effective enough.
5
brokenmessiah Mar 27, 2026 +9
I just don't see how effective a protest can be when everyone knows people will just go home eventually.
9
IrrelevantLeprechaun Mar 27, 2026 +2
They're still doing far more than YOU are, Doomer.
2
[deleted] Mar 27, 2026 +1
[removed]
1
AbsolutelyHorrendous Mar 27, 2026 +2
This is the problem. Sure, getting people out on the streets is great for letting their voices be heard, but its easy to ignore those voices when they're all going home at the end of the day
2
brokenmessiah Mar 27, 2026 +4
Not even that, people leave when their phones are about to die. Protesting is supposed to be uncomfortable for everyone involved or its not effective.
4
Mutant-Cat Mar 28, 2026 +1
If you read the article you'd see that Donegan argues that protests serve as an entry point into activism for many people. Sure, some just go home and think they're done. But others will be activated to get more and more involved.
1
Creative_Visit122 Mar 27, 2026 +2
No we need a protest against dementia in politics and limits on age serving official government positions, as well as profiting from insider trading due to global market manipulation.
2
HostileCrabPeople Mar 27, 2026 +2
We need weekly protests
2
DaddyBison Mar 27, 2026 +3
We need a general strike with no pre-defined end date
3
Cleanbriefs Mar 27, 2026 +8
Any protest scheduled for one day, on a weekend, well it’s just not gonna do much tbh, a protest is about disruption, like, the French know how to do protests. Maybe hire a few European protest consultants. This way is not the way to make meaningful impact long term. Nobody is stepping down because of a Saturday 10-3pm protest.
8
InfamousYenYu Mar 27, 2026 +3
No Kings isn't supposed to be a checkmate to the epstein regime. It's the opening move of a longer game. No Kings is about marshalling the resources needed to wage a proper campaign. Manpower, legitimacy, and awareness. Each new face in the record breaking crowd is another potential activist. Breaking records builds awareness. Widespread nonviolence builds legitimacy. You're wrong about there being no meaningful long term impact. Increasing the recruiting pool for activists, building legitimacy and raising awareness are all long term benefits. European protestors have the advantage of preexisting infrastructure to enable civil disobedience (unions, strike funds, lawyers on retainer, etc), whereas Americans have to rebuild ours at scale. Comparing the two is reductive. Europeans lording their superior activism over their state side friends is mean spirited and wrong. The regressives are on the verge of doing to Europe what they did to the US, and the European left resting on their laurels will see them lose just like America did when we got complacent after the Civil Rights movement.
3
baitnnswitch Mar 27, 2026 +5
ITT: a bunch of comments saying "this one action isn't going to do anything by itself, better skip doing it" This is like arguing it's not worth it to write an op-ed, help on a campaign, join a mutual aid organization or any of it because that one move isn't going to destroy the evil power structure like throwing the one ring into the fires of Mt Doom. It unfortunately doesn't work like that. We need a protest even though a protest by itself isn't going to take it all down. And if you want a general strike or any real resistance, how do you think we're going to get there without a nationwide protest? You think people are going to risk losing their jobs if you just ask them to? "Hey guys the general strike is happening, believe me. This one is real." People need to feel like they're not sticking their necks out alone. That's the point.
5
rocksoffjagger Mar 27, 2026 +2
That is not what we're saying. We're saying this whole movement is controlled opposition. The No Kings protests have been around for a year now, and yet they have no list of demands, and have not created any local chapters or organizing groups for participants to play a democratic role in what the aims of the movement are or how they'll be achieved. This is not by accident. It's because the whole movement is funded by dark money from the donor class, with the intention of diverting angry but minimally politically engaged people into a controlled setting where they won't cause any harm to entrenched lower structures rather than allowing them to accidentally find their way to a more effective movement. The No Kings rallies aren't just useless, they're actively bad. Their purpose is to make people feel like they've done their parts and go home rather than demanding more.
2
baitnnswitch Mar 27, 2026 +5
That'd be a pretty silly move considering how much recruitment happens for orgs like the DSA and mutual aid groups at these protests. If their aim is to prevent progressives from getting organized, I can't see how they'd think this helps Hell if you hear of a better national protest to attend I'm all ears. But this protest losing steam now when there's no alternative protest at scale would signal to this admin and to the world we're rolling over. That's the reality now, like it or not
5
MiddleAgedSponger Mar 27, 2026 +5
Schedule a protest for 9:00 AM on a Monday in the middle of a highway. The people who buy politicians could care less about orderly non disruptive protests that don't cause disturbance or affect profits. The problem is extreme wealth inequality and billionaires ability to buy elections with their pocket change. They are not going up the the influence and wealth they bought if you ask nicely. Staying Docile isn't going to work.
5
IrrelevantLeprechaun Mar 27, 2026 +1
Ok go organize it yourself, big tough guy.
1
nemo1316 Mar 27, 2026 +5
we don't need them, we need real, effective resistance. economic boycotts. strikes. No King's does f*** all
5
IrrelevantLeprechaun Mar 27, 2026 +2
Go organize your own then, Doomer.
2
AlexRyang Mar 27, 2026 +8
No Kings is performative; relying on permitting, criticizing other protests, and only protesting once or twice a year.
8
mahlerlieber Mar 27, 2026 +4
I'm not sure who all reads articles/op eds like these, but it's probably not the people who need to read it. A No Kings rally may get some MAGAs to re-think their position, maybe it will give them the confidence to change their views while saving face...kinda the way MAGA came to be in the first place: it's become popular. But somehow, the MAGAs who are leaning on the fence need to see that their fears/anger/frustration are not in their imagination, and trump truly is not who they think he is.
4
BlahBlahBlackCheap Mar 27, 2026 +6
The only way they rethink their position is if something about their position starts affecting them personally. For that reason Im hoping for 20 dollar gas.
6
IcyTransportation961 Mar 27, 2026 +5
Lol no maga people are swayed by protests against them, its been a decade
5
bluetenthousand Mar 27, 2026 +6
In a world where there are violent ICE responses and militaries in the streets attacking their own citizens, having people mass in opposition to their government is a powerful statement of solidarity. It isn’t so important as to change the minds of MAGA voters. It’s for all the Republicans and young disaffected men who had held their nose and voted Trump to understand that there is broad opposition policies.
6
mahlerlieber Mar 27, 2026 +2
Fair enough. I think this past election had a lot of people holding their noses. And dems need to figure out how to win these people back to stability...NOT back to the status quo.
2
bluetenthousand Mar 27, 2026 +2
Agreed. I’m tired of status quo Democrats who are owned by corporations and whose only argument seems to be we are better than Trump. That’s a low bar.
2
Faustrolled Mar 27, 2026 +1
You don't actually own a politician after donating a few grand. You just don't.
1
bluetenthousand Mar 27, 2026 +1
No you own them by putting millions into their campaign via SuperPACs that “aren’t allowed to coordinate” with the campaign.
1
timnphilly Mar 27, 2026 +3
No Kings protests will not be effective as long as kids & dogs attend to make it akin to a walk in the park; real protests inflict pain on the regime - and that is key. Trump is unlike any other in that he thrives on bad press. Trump will be laughing at Saturday's coverage as he watches while putting his signature on our money with his golden sharpie.
3
mahlerlieber Mar 27, 2026 +3
I was listening to a podcast yesterday (probably the Bulwark), and the organizer of No Kings was talking about how much "mirth" affects how authoritarians view the protests. This regime (and its cronies) has stopped talking about these protests because they've found that trying to incite them to violence is not working. Authoritarians love fear, and they love to be able to quash an uprising where people have pitchforks and torches...it gives them a reason to take retaliatory action. The "pain" that these protests inflict on these goons comes from seeing that what they are doing is not only *not* going to break our resolve, but it won't change our morale either. We will continue to call trump a clown and show him he isn't scary. Smiles at a protest are unique, and it does bother them.
3
Bosfordjd Mar 27, 2026 +5
A weekend protest, that does literally nothing. You have to show up, every day, shut down economic activity, drag lawmakers from their homes etc. US protesting is such a joke. It's just like watching democrats try to play inside the lines when dealing with lawlessness, it's feckless and a waste of time.
5
TwylaBloomy Mar 27, 2026 +3
we’re still dealing with the fallout from his presidency. Like, every week is another horror story. The No Kings protests sound crucial, though. We gotta keep pushing back! Can't just sit and wait for change to happen, ya know? It's time to stand up
3
glazzyazz Mar 27, 2026 +2
For all those that are here to denigrate the protests, I get your points, but don’t see any of you leading any resistance groups. Are you putting yourself out there and starting up any kind of group or are you just complaining about how things aren’t being done the right way?
2
Aggravatingbrah Mar 27, 2026 +4
They’re keyboard warriors, probably living in their parents basements talking about all the action WE should be taking. As they log back into Fortnite
4
Elguapo69 Mar 27, 2026 +3
For these No Kings protest to be effective they need to organize and centralize and march on Washington similar to the 60s civil rights movement protests. Nobody cares about a No Kings protest in Tulsa, Oklahoma or Fayetteville, Arkansas. The message is lost on deaf ears. But you pool all these little localized protests into one big one and time it when law makers are in session and maybe it gets more attention
3
elihu Mar 27, 2026 +2
I'd like to think there are people in Tulsa or Fayettville who are as frustrated with the Trump administration as I am, and want the world to know it. Seeing other like-minded people is a powerful thing even if the rest of the country has written them off as being from a red state and therefore they "don't matter". Marching on Washington would be neat, but it's not like the Trump administration or Republicans in Congress are going change policies. The sad fact is they're going to do what they're going to do and there's not very much we can do to stop it. What we can do is let our local governments, officials, bureaucrats, judges, police, and members of the armed forces everywhere that we don't approve of what Trump is doing and that if they were to oppose the Trump administration through whatever large or small means is available to them, they have the public's support. If someone wants to organize a march on Washington that's probably a worthwhile goal, but the decentralized No Kings protests are also worthwhile as they are.
2
IrrelevantLeprechaun Mar 27, 2026 +2
I don't think you understand how f****** huge USA is. How exactly can a Washington protest even work when most people are not just hours but DAYS of driving away from DC? You expect everyone to just drop everything they're doing to go spend two weeks driving?
2
No_Student_7337 Mar 27, 2026 +2
That protest can't accomplish what a few grains could. The orange dictator doesn't give a f*** and America is weak.
2
WillingElderberry301 Mar 27, 2026 +2
the fact that millions of people literally have to march in the streets in 2026 just to remind the government that the executive branch isn't a monarchy with absolute immunity is wild ngl. the founding fathers are definitely spinning in their graves right now.
2
Bittererr Mar 27, 2026 +4
Millions of people are only marching in the street to tell the government they don't want a monarchy because tens of millions of people told the government they did want a monarchy last election. Of the people who bothered to show up to vote, demanding a tyrant was the most popular choice.
4
elihu Mar 27, 2026 +2
Really, we went from having a president to having a king when the Supreme Court ruled that presidents are immune from prosecution for "official acts". Biden was the first king, he just didn't use his kingly powers. Whoever takes office after Trump will be a king or queen too, until we fix our broken political system.
2
iownlotsofdoors Mar 27, 2026 +1
sorry to tell you this but the guy you replied to is a bot
1
southernsun Mar 27, 2026 +1
How about a general strike instead of useless weekend protests? You know, land of the free, home of the brave kind of thing?
1
ZunarDoric Mar 27, 2026 +3
Action is needed, not protesting. Sounds alone will not force directional change
3
Aamun_Sarastus Mar 27, 2026 +2
I swear, there is some coordinated effort going on by MSM, to gaslight people into thinking sunday afternoon protests are somehow useful or important or enough. I really hope people who think scheduled summer sunday protests are somehow meaningful, useful or impactful are right. This shit looks vapid and performative to me. "Seee!! I was there, took a selfie. Therefore, I'm doing my best" What has this stuff achieved in past? Opposing side protested by trying to stage a coup. That's how they attack democracy. Good thing democracy is protecred by selfies of people holding picket signs. Weekend protests with clear, clean pre determined ending hour have as much effect to political climate as Stanley Cup celebrations or Mardi Gras. People you oppose are happy that you burn your energy in such a safe and trivial way. Maga equivalent of no kings rally is a version of Jan6 where a million people split between a thousand cities wave some maga signs around for three hours, then go home. "Honk if you like trump!!"
2
TheIncredibleHelck Mar 27, 2026 +1
We need the cowards near him to sack up and arrest him. He's done enough illegal things as president and from before that he should be in jail by now. Its disappointing how fragile democracy is when nobody is willing to enforce it.
1
aberwiesokolleg Mar 27, 2026 +1
[ Removed by Listnook ]
1
Kennydoe Mar 27, 2026 +1
[ Removed by Listnook ]
1
OkFix4074 Mar 27, 2026 +1
Bro america needs to vote sanity back in mid terms , everything else is pointless
1
faith_apnea Mar 27, 2026 +1
What we need is for people to put their pride away and to learn basic [Civics](https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/us-government-and-civics). * Foundations - How our government works (or did at one time) * Three branches (before the absolute corruption) * Civil rights Without a solid understanding as a cornerstone, dumbasses will just keep voting for conmen like Trump.
1
itsdietz Mar 27, 2026 +1
Ya but they van only be scheduled on days nobody is working /s
1
Camiott Mar 27, 2026 +1
[ Removed by Listnook ]
1
my_midlife_isekai Mar 27, 2026 +1
🧊🔨3278-5447-0437🧊🔨 IYKYK
1
Torrsall Mar 27, 2026 +1
Of all the horror I've seen since he took over, the atrocities to Gaza residents really hit hard. The beatings, the shootings, the stealing, the starvation and the thirst make me ashamed to be a human involved with supporting that blood thirsty behavior. Imagine being forced to watch as criminals burn your infant son while others cheer for your eradication?
1
_recapitated Mar 27, 2026 +1
Weird. Usually you stage a protest because there's something you need that isn't a protest.
1
KingPotential4586 Mar 27, 2026 +1
Imho We need to seize the means of production more than ever!
1
bIackphillip Mar 27, 2026 +1
I don't mean to be a cynic, but God we are f****** cooked. The best alternative to the No Kings protests people can come up with is a nationwide general strike. It's not gonna fuckin happen. Y'all don't even know the first thing about strikes, probably because the vast majority of y'all aren't and haven't ever been in a union. It's not our fault, this was by design. The American labor movement was stopped in its tracks before unions could really take hold everywhere, which is why the average American just thinks "strike is when everyone decides not to go to work for a day, then Change magically happens"
1
ProfessorUnfair283 Mar 27, 2026 +1
no type of protest will be enough. asking an american to anything but whine to a news camera is more than their government gives them the autonomy to do of their own free will. we need foreign military stability if our own wont step in. cops here used to say that we didnt have to worry about state department thugs because of all the malitias around. i dont know what theyre doing now.
1
Accomplished_Lab_675 Mar 28, 2026 +1
Sorry to say but we need much more than just performative protests.
1
Kelp72plus Mar 28, 2026 +1
It’s been argued, by people who study protests as change agents, that these kind of one day protests dissipate actionable change power protests. They get people out, but make no demands, are over in a day…as opposed to ongoing protests and marches - as in US civil rights and S Korea, goal of immediate change continuing until change happens. Even the ones in MN this past winter are more pushback and caused more change. I hope it goes well, but I want big change.
1
HowardBunnyColvin Mar 27, 2026 +2
we need to take the protest to the ballot box and vote in representatives that reflect said ideals no more hiding or staying at home because of gaza
2
elihu Mar 27, 2026 +6
Some people are never going to vote for candidates they see as genocide enablers. It's like the trolley problem; some people aren't going to pull that lever no matter how wrong some other person thinks they are. Voting in representatives that reflect one's ideals might mean backing primary candidates that every reasonable human being can support without feeling like they're compromising their principles. Being for continuing to send weapons to Israel with no strings attached is a losing position that's way out of step with the majority of the Democratic party -- and most independents, for that matter. Hopefully most of the Democratic candidates up for reelection have figured this out by now.
6
Fun-Sun-8192 Mar 27, 2026 +1
No you don't. You need to actually do REAL actions. Do not go to No Kings. You are wasting time and energy that would be better spent on doing almost ANYTHING in your community. "We assembled as a big crowd" is not action if you aren't planning to DO something with that crowd. Getting together to demonstrate with no plan and no demands is pointless and wastes morale and energy that everyone attending would do better by investing into local and state level work. That kind of work is hard to conceputalize and hard to do though, so people go for an outlet like this where they can imagine they did something by standing outside for 2 hours. They haven't. They can't. No Kings is pointless.
1
jpg52382 Mar 27, 2026
Lame and ineffective. We don't have a king, we have a oligarchy, pls pay attention.
0
Sufficient-Will3644 Mar 27, 2026
On a Saturday?
0
IGetBoredSometimes23 Mar 27, 2026 +2
Do these protests have any actual demands in terms of policy? 
2
rocksoffjagger Mar 27, 2026 +1
These events are controlled opposition. They have no demands (except those imposed ON their own protesters), they're funded by massive amounts of dark money from the donor class, and they give people the feeling they've done something when they haven't. It's a classic example of mobilization without organization. I attended a couple at the beginning, and after I was lectured about using bad language for yelling "f*** ICE" at the last one by the organizers and reprimanded for yelling something about Karen Read at the Canton, MA police at one of the ones I attended, I realized this was not a useful event. I genuinely think these "protests" are worse than nothing, because they coopt actual frustration and anger that would naturally go into something more productive and grassroots if they didn't exist. Compare the Minnesota ICE protests to No Kings and the difference is staggering. We absolutely need mass protest, but that protest absolutely CAN NOT be No Kings.
1
khearan Mar 27, 2026 +1
A 1 day protest, although great to see millions united against an enemy of America, is not effective.
1
Due-Resort-2699 Mar 27, 2026 +1
It’s no longer enough to march with signs and slogans . Trump and his administration needs to be removed from office. An “American Spring” is needed. The people must take to the streets and stay there .
1
[deleted] Mar 27, 2026 +1
Yay let’s get in the street and yell since all else has failed
1
Standard-Contest-949 Mar 27, 2026 +1
He will be hiding out at Mar a largo and golfing not giving a shit.
1
One_Weird2371 Mar 27, 2026 +1
These rallies are pointless and accomplish nothing. Voting is what matters. 
1
Traditional-Walk-954 Mar 27, 2026 +1
Seriously. The list is so long it feels like a dystopian novel. Every week a new chapter.
1
ToubDeBoub Mar 27, 2026 +1
Times running out on this. In November, the transition into a fascist dictatorship will be complete. Soon after, Trump will be replaced with the more controllable puppet Vance to finish transition into oligarchy that's happened for decades.
1
MistahBrukshot13 Mar 27, 2026 +1
I think we need a lot more than just another No Kings protest. Trump and co do not give a single f***.
1
HailYurii Mar 27, 2026 +1
Sounds like everyone at the no kings protest should do something.
1
← Back to Board