This clearly illustrates the problem with land-based subsidies. If payments scale mainly with how much land you control, the biggest owners will keep winning, even when the money ends up benefiting foreign state-linked investors instead of ordinary European farmers
22
Hairy_Pound_1356May 7, 2026
+9
Well are they farming shit in the EU?
9
MajorMessMay 7, 2026
Shit-farmer, yuh know seh dat ah me Snow, mi ah guh blame
Ah lick he boom-boom down
'Tective man ah seh, seh dat ah me Snow, mi stab someone down di lane
Ah lick he boom-boom down
- Snow, 1993
0
Hairy_Pound_1356May 7, 2026
+5
What the f*** even is this comment
5
MajorMessMay 7, 2026
+1
It’s a joke. Don’t be scared.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSffz_bl6zo&list=RDTSffz_bl6zo&start_radio=1&pp=ygUNSW5mb3JtZXIgc25vd6AHAQ%3D%3D&ra=m
1
Hairy_Pound_1356May 8, 2026
+3
I still have no idea what this supposed be
3
bio4mMay 7, 2026
+12
They own farms in Europe and are getting farm subsidies that any farm owner can get
12
ShermansFieldOrder66May 7, 2026
+10
They shouldn't.
10
Ok_Poetry_2696May 9, 2026
-2
Why? If the condition are met I don't see the issue
-2
PharoahtossawayMay 7, 2026
+2
Now partner with a USA news corp and investigate the Saudi holdings in Califonia.
2
DeditchMay 7, 2026
+2
is this not true for all executive leadership of farms that get subsidies? If you want to tie it to executive pay than do so but dont pretend that this isnt how it's supposed to work
11 Comments