This clearly illustrates the problem with land-based subsidies. If payments scale mainly with how much land you control, the biggest owners will keep winning, even when the money ends up benefiting foreign state-linked investors instead of ordinary European farmers
22
Hairy_Pound_13566 days ago
+9
Well are they farming shit in the EU?
9
MajorMess6 days ago
Shit-farmer, yuh know seh dat ah me Snow, mi ah guh blame
Ah lick he boom-boom down
'Tective man ah seh, seh dat ah me Snow, mi stab someone down di lane
Ah lick he boom-boom down
- Snow, 1993
0
Hairy_Pound_13566 days ago
+5
What the f*** even is this comment
5
MajorMess6 days ago
+1
It’s a joke. Don’t be scared.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSffz_bl6zo&list=RDTSffz_bl6zo&start_radio=1&pp=ygUNSW5mb3JtZXIgc25vd6AHAQ%3D%3D&ra=m
1
Hairy_Pound_13565 days ago
+3
I still have no idea what this supposed be
3
bio4m6 days ago
+12
They own farms in Europe and are getting farm subsidies that any farm owner can get
12
ShermansFieldOrder665 days ago
+10
They shouldn't.
10
Ok_Poetry_26964 days ago
-2
Why? If the condition are met I don't see the issue
-2
Pharoahtossaway6 days ago
+2
Now partner with a USA news corp and investigate the Saudi holdings in Califonia.
2
Deditch6 days ago
+2
is this not true for all executive leadership of farms that get subsidies? If you want to tie it to executive pay than do so but dont pretend that this isnt how it's supposed to work
11 Comments