· 199 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 2, 2026 at 11:24 AM

UK to host talks with 35 countries on reopening Strait of Hormuz, US absent

Posted by barsik_


US absent as UK hosts talks with 35 nations on reopening Strait of Hormuz | The Jerusalem Post
The Jerusalem Post | JPost.com
US absent as UK hosts talks with 35 nations on reopening Strait of Hormuz | The Jerusalem Post
British foreign minister Yvette Cooper will chair the virtual meeting of about 35 countries including France, Germany, Italy, Canada and the United Arab Emirates.

🚩 Report this post

199 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
imthefakeagent Apr 2, 2026 +239
Best investment Russia ever made.
239
40to6inthe4th Apr 2, 2026 +75
Belarus and Hungary were the test dummies for their political and cyber warfare, the USA was the long term target and prize. I can believe our Billionaires sold us out to the Russians and Israel, I cant believe the entire Republican Party and their voting base flipped towards outright supporting Russia so hard. This country needs to be split up, cause "the grand experiment" just ain't workin anymore.
75
Jops817 Apr 2, 2026 +18
I mean, Republicans visited Putin on literally July 4th, all anyone would have needed to know...
18
RarelyReadReplies Apr 2, 2026 +4
I would love to see the US split up, then I could start considering the sane part of your country friends and allies again. Until that happens, or America gets its act together for 2 or 3 decades in a row, us Canadians will definitely be treating you like any other dangerous superpower (China, India, etc.)
4
VreamCanMan Apr 2, 2026 +16
I mean eh not especially. Russia hasn't really done all that well despite interfering so heavily. The US isn't going to set russia in its sights beyond nuclear policy, so it was never the US presumably expansionist Russian foreign policy needed to consider. The UK and EU defence arrangements are all far more interconnected and far more resilient than 20 years ago, neutral european countries now take action against or alliances protecting from Russian aggression, and europe as a whole is very effectively diminishing the future strength of the Russian economy and future military capability by maximising the amount of ordinance ukraine has available. Putin could very easily be said to be the best nato advocate the world has seen in decades
16
Pleasant_Narwhal_350 Apr 3, 2026 +2
That's because the Russia-aligned interests in Britain (Farage and Corbyn) are currently powerless.
2
OldLondon Apr 2, 2026 +1088
If Starmer gets a peace prize it will be the best thing ever - Trump will legit explode 
1088
Anaptyso Apr 2, 2026 +298
As a bonus, the Daily Mail and Telegraph in the UK would as well, which would be very funny to watch.
298
Frogblood Apr 2, 2026 +46
They'd just call the Peace prize woke and complain that Starmer isn't personally harpooning boats crossing the channel.
46
Maeran Apr 2, 2026 +44
I would love that so much
44
Goldf_sh4 Apr 2, 2026 +8
It would be so good.
8
Agent_Stormbird Apr 2, 2026 +5
Wouldn't come close to GB news
5
Ham_I_right Apr 2, 2026 +21
Can we get Obama involved somehow for a back to back peace prize for the meltdown potential of trump?
21
TherapinStormblessed Apr 2, 2026 +11
You ain't thinking bigly enough: I say, let's give the Nobel Peace prize to the world population for their unrelenting resilience, bravery and optimism in the face of apparently overwhelming challenges (war, climate change, economic crisis after crises) - that is, the whole world EXCEPT one Donald J. Trump.
11
Doowoo Apr 2, 2026 +15
Only solution would be another war
15
Chusten Apr 2, 2026 +30
Or, global replacement of the petro-dollar and accepting a 2% toll per shipment to Iran. Turning Iran into a global economic power. US losses and the world moves on without them.
30
Doowoo Apr 2, 2026 +6
No.. in Trumps head.. against the UK
6
WTFnoAvailableNames Apr 2, 2026 +3
Everyone loses if that ends up happening. Well everyone except Iran, China and Russia. Iran is a terror state.
3
Chusten Apr 2, 2026 +3
That might be a more stable world order than the current one, apparently.
3
Frozefoots Apr 2, 2026 +1420
"Go get your own oil!" UK: Okay. Hey, 35 countries, we're going to see how to get our own oil, you in? 35 countries: Bet! Incoming Truth Social meltdown about how unfair this all is?
1420
Arthurmanercatsirman Apr 2, 2026 +233
I didn't mean like that! You don't ask for things, you just take them 
233
Electronic-Source368 Apr 2, 2026 +151
Grab them by the petrochemicals?
151
diemenschmachine Apr 2, 2026 +25
pedochemicals\*
25
JonBunne Apr 2, 2026 +34
Trump: You guys weren't supposed to make deals. That's my thing. The deal.
34
Status_Jellyfish_213 Apr 2, 2026 +9
Only thing that a****** can deal in is the art of the shart.
9
ChucksnTaylor Apr 2, 2026 +123
I shouldn’t be surprised any more but god this is such an insane development. Trump starts a war of his own choosing, it results in a completely predictable outcome of closing the strait and turning the world economy upside down. So he says “I’m ending the war soon, but the straits not my problem, good luck with that”. HOW IS IT NOT YOUR PROBLEM?! It’s only closed because of you!!
123
DoireK Apr 2, 2026 +61
It is his fault, but not really his problem. The guy is a f****** a****** and so are an awful lot of Americans. Time for europe to go it alone.
61
gildedbluetrout Apr 2, 2026 +36
Yeah Americans are mostly cunts really. Im sick to the back teeth of them.
36
IamDDT Apr 2, 2026 +9
I'm American, and you are correct about two thirds of this country. One third loves Trump. One third can't be bothered to vote. And only the last third actually cares.
9
DoireK Apr 2, 2026 +12
Yeah I know not all are cunts, some are amazing people, but far too many are sadly.
12
IamDDT Apr 2, 2026 +5
Don't insult cunts that way! Cunts bring joy to billions! Can these people say the same?
5
LoopStricken Apr 2, 2026 +2
I wonder if their ancestors are smiling at them.
2
loralailoralai Apr 3, 2026 +2
Americans need to stop telling us this. We are aware. We are also aware that you’re ALL enabling him now. Just stop trying to ‘educate’ us. We know *far more* about the u.s than you know about the rest of the world. We are not ignorant.
2
ExcellentAirPirate Apr 2, 2026 +38
The Philippines and Maylasia just struck deals to allow ships thru, everyone is just going to go around the US and broker deals directly with Iran, no one's want to go kill their people trying to open it by force. We stepped on the rake and are mad no one else wants to step on the rake
38
RarelyReadReplies Apr 2, 2026 +3
Iran has already said they want to basically turn it into a toll route. Want to go through the strait? It's going to cost you. I expect we'll see something along those lines.
3
globalzee Apr 3, 2026 +2
>*We stepped on the rake and are mad no one else wants to step on the rake* I love this analogy
2
Fast-Satisfaction482 Apr 2, 2026 +72
Petro Pound incoming. Make Britain Great again. 
72
nineandaquarter Apr 2, 2026 +9
That has a much nicer ring to it.
9
Ephialties Apr 2, 2026 +3
sounds like fossil fuel s*** time...
3
Ziazan Apr 2, 2026 +2
the pp
2
MercantileReptile Apr 2, 2026 +10
"So, about the history of British Petroleum in Iran...." - Iran, probably.
10
madogvelkor Apr 2, 2026 +17
I expect if there's any payment to Iran involved Trump will threaten tariffs and sanctions on the nations involved. For funding terrorism or something.
17
ozgii Apr 2, 2026 +25
Try sanctioning the whole world, see how that works for you. Buuuuut, russia is a big trading partner with iran, and he is doing his best to make russia great again.
25
madogvelkor Apr 2, 2026 +6
It would be a way to work around the court blocking his blanket tariffs. Existing US sanctions laws on Iran would allow Trump to issue sanctions on any country or company that gives any payment to Iran. Completely bypassing the Supreme Court ruling and no need for Congress to pass new laws.
6
TupacBatmanOfTheHood Apr 2, 2026 +2
100% he'll throw a tantrum and do this
2
Even_Trifle9341 Apr 2, 2026 +5
I know of a country with lots of oil that could use some democracy.
5
roChipftw Apr 3, 2026 +2
America?
2
Budget-Tadpole7520 Apr 2, 2026 +2
Will they be exchanging in US dollars?
2
cre8ivjay Apr 2, 2026 +5
Should Canada say the same to the US?
5
sully545 Apr 2, 2026 +24
Canada is listed as one of the 35
24
dpwtr Apr 2, 2026 +629
They will shift further from the US and make deals with Iran via China (and probably India) to resolve it as soon as possible with no military action. Both China and Iran will be receptive because all that matters is making the US look like this entire excursion wasn't worth it, but they'll still make a play to bring an end to the Petrodollar.
629
peterpan764 Apr 2, 2026 +146
Iran has the choke Russia has the supply China has the alternative system to use I am far away from an expert but this could seriously hurt the dollar no?
146
Leading-Onion4659 Apr 2, 2026 +220
Not just that, the whole balance of power will slowly shift. Not tomorrow but maybe in coming years. Trump has done more damage to the US than any so-called enemies of murica.
220
squeeze-my-lizard Apr 2, 2026 +20
Let's say the current generation's grandsons and granddaughters will not cast them in a good light. Electing a traitor once is understandable (everyone makes mistakes); electing him twice is an awful mistake, but not removing him from power for as long as his authoritarian regime will last is completely unacceptable.
20
tweek-in-a-box Apr 2, 2026 +82
Which is why this whole Krasnov theory makes sense
82
plague042 Apr 2, 2026 +8
"Theory". At this point we can pretty much say Trump works or is being blackmailed by Putin.
8
NegativeCreeq Apr 2, 2026 +3
Trjmps just the enemy within.
3
Altruistic_Finger669 Apr 2, 2026 +3
He literally made europeans hate the US...and not just trump. Americans in general have lost true standing. One thing is that he is a maniac but the fact his approval rating isnt at 10% is even worss
3
tosser1579 Apr 2, 2026 +35
Basically, also project 2025 really wants de-dollarization to happen so it is on Trump's Bingo card. Oil trading in the Yuan, or some other currency is going to cause the value of the dollar to decline which is going to further push inflation.
35
peterpan764 Apr 2, 2026 +19
I just don’t see the goal here. Do they want to devalue the dollar to get out of their debt? I refuse to believe that this happened „because trump felt like it“.
19
tosser1579 Apr 2, 2026 +29
The underpinning of de-dollarization by the people who are seemingly in charge right now, is that because the US dollar is the world's reserve currency, it causes the US to operate in trade deficits and that hollowed out US manufacturing. Ending the 'Dollar Empire' will remove those trade deficits and cause massive onshoring of American Industry. What has Trump been trying to do through his tariffs?
29
Dry_Traffic8365 Apr 2, 2026 +33
There is logic to it. What it fails to grasp is what it does to America’s power projection. And if I can quote Dave Chappelle’s act from a few years ago, to people saying they want jobs to come back to the US - ‘why so iPhones can be $9000? Nobody wants to work that hard’ But then. I’m not an economist. I just don’t quite understand how that move doesn’t cut the legs off America on a global stage but that be a good thing
33
DesecratedPeanut Apr 2, 2026 +28
And the American way of life. There wont be a utopian future of safety standards, workers rights and somehow american born manufacturing it'll be a dark future of zero rights, bad conditions, poor pay, poverty like you've never seen before in the US, and shit slow to grow industry that will be outflanked by China at every turn.
28
Tasty_Goat_3267 Apr 2, 2026 +12
Outflanked by China? If the US goes that route, within 20 years Ghana would outflank the US on all those points.
12
Taxing Apr 2, 2026 +80
The oil matters more to all of them, they need it, they benefit from reopening.
80
CaptainRAVE2 Apr 2, 2026 +10
Cheaper and easier to pay Iran’s toll than most other strategies in the short term
10
[deleted] Apr 2, 2026 +3
[deleted]
3
Gh0stPeppers Apr 2, 2026 +37
The biggest problem with ditching the USD as the petrodollar isn’t the idea, it’s the replacement. What realistically takes its place? Right now, the only serious alternative is the euro, not the Chinese yuan. China still actively manages its currency, and that lack of transparency and market freedom makes it a tough sell globally. Countries don’t want to tie their energy markets to something the government can directly influence whenever it wants. That’s the part people gloss over. It’s not just about moving away from the dollar, it’s about trusting what replaces it. As for the current political climate in the U.S., yeah, it’s messy. But geopolitically, it’s short-term noise. Three years feels long domestically, but on the global stage that’s nothing. Major structural shifts like replacing the dollar in global energy markets don’t happen based on one administration. For that kind of change, you’d need a clear, long-term economic advantage and stability from the alternative. That’s not really there right now. So what you’re seeing is more hedging than replacing. Countries might explore options, but a full shift? That’s a different level, and we’re not there yet.
37
nightwing0243 Apr 2, 2026 +21
We have been incredibly lucky that America didn't sink into autocracy for as long as it did given how easy it did happen under Trump. They have always been only one election away from this happening because the US has previously been operating under the "good chap" theory - which a lot of western countries also do. But America's political system seems much easier for a cult of personality to thrive. The US government has either had politicians in charge that do adhere to rules and precedent (even if is half-assed), and politicians who don't but at least put up the facade that they do. Trump exploited that. He knew enough people supported him that anything he did wouldn't put much of a dent on his momentum; but he also knew that the US justice system wouldn't actually do anything to him. He doesn't pretend to hold himself to any standard - he just does and says whatever he wants and there is nobody left in the republican party to at least tell him "hey, maybe that's not such a good idea sir". You say it is "short term noise", but it's not. The chances of America having a free and fair election have drastically shot down now that ICE are Trump's hired thugs who can and will use voting suppression tactics come the mid-terms; and he is attacking mail in ballots now. Even when Trump dies - there will be plenty of people to step in to try and replicate his success; and god knows what happens if it's someone worse than Trump who is actually intelligent about it. The point is that unless there are some serious political reforms in the US if/when democrats take power again it's always going to be "in one election it can happen again" - even if you were to elect Obama to third term at this point. And that's the true damage of Trump's second term. The world is gearing up to move on in a world where the US is no longer the big boy at the table. A full shift doesn't happen overnight, but Trump is somehow ensuring it happens as fast as possible. A lot of countries the US has historically been allied with have shown him nothing but the respect he demands for the past year - and somehow it still wasn't good enough for him. He has threatened the sovereignty of his neighbors, trash talked Europe again and again and again, and now he has rattled the world economy by bombing another country he didn't need to bomb; then proceeded to spread misinformation and play the victim by claiming the US was always there for NATO, but NATO was never there for the US. Like are you f****** kidding me? Combine that with his authoritarian nature domestically? No. There is no easy road back to the way things were. That line has been crossed. If it wasn't before Iran, it certainly is during and after Iran.
21
Inveniet9 Apr 2, 2026 +24
Well, sounds like euro then. And the trust in the US is damaged long-term. Even if a Democrat wins, we still need to address that the current war is not that different from wars the Democratic Party was also involved in, Epstein files are still there and were blocked from publishing by Democrats, and also a new Trump can come anytime. The EU has a lot better reputation.
24
FratStarWorldWide Apr 2, 2026 +8
The problem with the euro is there is no way to get it to be backed by oil. People tend to forget the mining processes to get Lithium and Cyan etc. the parts that make semiconductors and batteries are some of the most toxic substances as byproducts on the planet. EVs are not this great environmental friendly save that everyone thinks they are. To top that off the amount of infrastructure and power that would be needed to run a world run by EVs is not even capable by current modern power systems. A world run by petroleum isn't going anywhere soon. You have very few options in a world run by oil.
8
LionRight4175 Apr 2, 2026 +5
Semiconductors and batteries can be recycled, oil can't. If a car battery or a solar panel goes bad (which takes like 30 years these days), the material is still sitting there to be turned into a new version, with minimal loss. Once the conversion to EVs and renewable energy is done, we could hypothetically switch to maintenence mode and only mine what is needed to replace catastrophic losses (fires and the like). The same can't be said for oil. There is no way to reuse or recycle it. The only way to reduce the pollution from oil is to use less of it, and the only path to doing so that is currently feasible is renewables.
5
KT7STEU Apr 2, 2026 +3
What I like about renewables is how they create an higher degree of independence. Example: Blackouts in Cuba. In general regulatory reforms, financing mechanisms, and developing a local skilled workforce for capacity building would be needed for such a development.
3
rsa1 Apr 2, 2026 +5
> Right now, the only serious alternative is the euro, not the Chinese yuan. That presupposes that it needs to be a single currency. Why does it? Each country could sell or buy in their own currencies. A lot of trade happens that way, including in oil with the likes of Russia. > As for the current political climate in the U.S., yeah, it’s messy. But geopolitically, it’s short-term noise. Three years feels long domestically, but on the global stage that’s nothing. But will it end after 3 years? Let's say the next POTUS is a sane person. But what happens after another 4 years, do we again throw the dice? What happens another 4 years after that? The American voter has shown twice that they're willing to vote for Trump. And one of those times was after he carried out an insurrection. The American Congress has shown that they will happily allow a psychopathic POTUS to do whatever he wants, including brazenly breaking the law. Framing this as "noise" assumes that the problem resides in Trump personally, when in fact he's merely showing the massive structural flaws of the system. And an international order that revolves around the US automatically inherits those same structural flaws. Which is why it would be a massive mistake for other countries to go back to business as usual after 3 years. And it's also why it would be a mistake for them to replace the US with China and start revolving around them. Because that again guarantees a Chinese Trump in a few decades; much sooner in fact because that system has fewer checks and balances. > Major structural shifts like replacing the dollar in global energy markets don’t happen based on one administration. It's not because of one admin, but the fact that the petrodollar is based on a deal that the US will protect the ME. With Trump explicitly reneging on his part of the bargain, other countries have no reason to continue holding up their end.
5
BroccoliSome256 Apr 2, 2026 +16
I don't think you fully appreciate the disdain for the US in many of the countries that has been building since Trump's first term and exploded during this one. There is an overwhelming amount of noise to distance ourselves from the US not only when it comes to oil but all trade, security, the lot. The Republican party is not going to return to what it was once Trump is out either, and the American public have proved we can't trust them to vote in sensible people.
16
NYGiants181 Apr 2, 2026 +8
Disdain is one thing, but we’re talking about hard economics. Again, what replaces it?
8
helm Apr 2, 2026 +6
Yeah, "don't trust us with anything" is the message I've heard from USA for 10 years now.
6
n05h Apr 2, 2026 +7
Perhaps Europe should also make a push for a Europetro.
7
ev00r1 Apr 2, 2026 +6
Unless something insane happens, I don't see European armies fighting Saudi Arabia's wars for them. (Or any other petrostate for that matter)
6
NYGiants181 Apr 2, 2026 +4
Isolationism Germany in the 1930s
4
Optimus_Prime_Day Apr 2, 2026 +3
Maybe they'll block ships destined to the US and the deal will have a US tax on it for countries reselling to the US (so those countries would increase prices just on sales to the US). Sounds like the UK cleaning up after trumps dump.
3
saulsa_ Apr 2, 2026 +73
Trump couldn't make it anyways, he has a Bored Of Peace meeting that day, and they're going to McDonalds afterwards.
73
jeepcrawler93 Apr 2, 2026 +14
They're gonna get some hamberders
14
PloppyTheSpaceship Apr 2, 2026 +3
They've got a special meeting planned at McDonald's - Ronald will be there, and they get the ball pit all to themselves.
3
cecirdr Apr 2, 2026 +32
The world is re-globalizing without us. We are now a pariah. Maybe we thought we'd deglobalize the world and knock everyone down, but instead, they'll just make their deals with each other and leave us out. We are in for a world of hurt. So much winning! /s
32
Significant-Ad1890 Apr 2, 2026 +3
Please Stop Mr.President, We can't handle this much winning anymore.
3
cheesesilver Apr 2, 2026 +235
You're all missing the point - they will just make a deal to pay a toll per ship and Iran will be the new master of the Strait moving forward.
235
LolzPatrol Apr 2, 2026 +158
I truly believe there is no way forward other than this. Then Iran gets to decide who has passage and can keep the flow of oil blocked for the US. If the US bombs / invades Iran then there would be 35 countries or more with an incentive to pressure the US out of doing so and at the same time the US looks weak and stupid on the world stage. All while Iran profits from using the strait as a toll. They were playing chess all along.
158
CelerMortis Apr 2, 2026 +95
Not to d******* Iranian strategy here, but it’s not hard to win a chess match against a toddler that just shit himself 
95
miscfiles Apr 2, 2026 +29
It is, however, hard to win said chess match without getting covered in shit.
29
bestmaokaina Apr 2, 2026 +19
I can see the US just bombing the strait by sheer jelousy that they are being left out of the deal lol
19
reptarge Apr 2, 2026 +25
U.S. doesn’t use the strait. It keeps prices higher for the U.S. because it’s based off the price of the oil internationally. Once the international oil prices are controlled for the countries that use the Strait, it will bring down the cost for the U.S.
25
RontoWraps Apr 2, 2026 +8
The U.S. doesn’t get much oil from this area of the world. It won’t really affect the U.S. that much. Bahrain, UAE, Kuwait, etc. mostly export to Asian markets. China, SK, Japan, India, Singapore, etc.
8
Seralph Apr 2, 2026 +3
And if all this countries no longer use USD to transact for their oil? What will happen to the US economy I wonder hmm?
3
imageize Apr 2, 2026 +7
This. Iran has realized how easy it is to close it. It's now their trump card and they'll be using it from now on. I can see them accepting a toll of some amount from every country except the US and Israel.
7
Gratts01 Apr 2, 2026 +17
Probably cheaper to pay the toll then spend billions in bombs and countless lives loss.
17
CaptainRAVE2 Apr 2, 2026 +4
With Europe only obtaining 4% of their energy through the strait and each ship carrying many millions worth of cargo, 2 million a pop is nothing.
4
DrogoOmega Apr 2, 2026 +18
Iran have long had defacto control over the strait. There are reasons as to why people haven't done Trump's dumb actions before. This is Trump's doing. People are not missing the point. What do you expect other countries to do, really? Everyone is already paying high prices. Everyone should just carry on and expect Trump to change his mind again? LOL
18
CaptainRAVE2 Apr 2, 2026 +3
In the short term it’s the best strategy while we shift supply acquisition to elsewhere.
3
IncidentalIncidence Apr 2, 2026 +8
Iran absolutely can't do that because it removes their leverage gives Trump carte blanche to continue the bombing campaign. Maybe after a ceasefire, but as long as Trump continues the bombing they can't open the strait.
8
rsa1 Apr 2, 2026 +6
Trump nether needs nor cares about a carte blanche. He operates on the principle of might is right. So if he thinks he can do it, he will, carte blanche or no.
6
Goldf_sh4 Apr 2, 2026 +2
How would that be bad?
2
SkipsH Apr 2, 2026 +103
The UK seems to be doing a really good job of being a diplomatic centre for a lot of conversation recently.
103
Anaptyso Apr 2, 2026 +39
It's fascinating watching Starmer be so useless on the domestic front, but doing a really good job internationally. It's as if he's two separate people with the same name doing a job share.
39
Mindless-Peak-1687 Apr 2, 2026 +78
Starter could fix all your problems and UK would still be unhappy with him.
78
YesTesco Apr 2, 2026 +17
He’s been good on the domestic front given how shit a state he was given 
17
TheArbitrageur Apr 2, 2026 +31
Where specifically has Starmer been useless domestically?
31
c0r3l86 Apr 2, 2026 +43
In the pages of the daily mail
43
ZenBreaking Apr 2, 2026 +64
Everybodys ships except the US can pass through
64
Own_Pop_9711 Apr 2, 2026 +35
The US doesn't have any ships that sail through this strait anyway.
35
Bacon4Lyf Apr 2, 2026 +8
So what was the point of all this
8
beesandchurgers Apr 2, 2026 +7
To try and deflect attention away from the fact that the sitting president of the united states raped and trafficked children with jeffery epstine
7
Own_Pop_9711 Apr 2, 2026 +3
Because the parts of the us that make it an economic powerhouse are very exposed to the price of oil.
3
Razzler1973 Apr 2, 2026 +36
Would be funny is diplomacy wins the day. The US pull out, declaring 'victory', everyone nods at them while side-eyeing each other behind their backs Everyone else has access and the US has to pay various fees for vessels through the Straits I know it *won't* happen like that but it'd be funny
36
IncidentalIncidence Apr 2, 2026 +16
The US doesn't send anything through the strait in the first place, that's kind of the entire point of why Trump was able to start the war at all.
16
HuckleberryLow2283 Apr 2, 2026 +4
The USA needs everyone to continue using dollars to buy oil though 
4
WilliamAgain Apr 2, 2026 +2
But we utilize the products and byproducts that pass through the straight. It does not matter if we ship anything through there if we buy and use the products that others do ship through there, e.g. helium, fertilizer, plastics (oil), etc.
2
MeatPopsicle_Corban Apr 2, 2026 +7
If that's true and the strait does not matter to the USA why has gas all over the USA risen so much?
7
jnikga Apr 2, 2026 +22
Because 20% of the world’s supply is missing from the market. U.S. producers are free to sell to the highest bidder
22
Scotsmania Apr 2, 2026 +5
It's not quite true. They weren't reliant on it as only 2% of their petroleum and 7% crude oil passes through there but that's still a lot of ships and doesn't count those from other types of industries.
5
darkstar8239 Apr 2, 2026 +3
It’s not that it doesn’t matter, it’s that the US uses it very little. As the other person said 20% of oil is out of the market, low supply = prices increases overall everywhere. This also means any products and food which uses oil for manufacturing, transportation, etc will also see price increases
3
SP1570 Apr 2, 2026 +18
Israel and the US declared war on the world order and eventually a new one must come out it...maybe not the one they would have wanted.
18
Nikiaf Apr 2, 2026 +30
We're witnessing in real time the establishment of a new world order. The West is now building itself as a united front, *without* the US.
30
bp332106 Apr 2, 2026 +6
We are now the Far West. The Far West is populated by idiots and radials.
6
Significant-Ad1890 Apr 2, 2026 +2
Canada and Mexico should ally with the world to make huge WALL between America and them. Then Let them use that middle land as prison for the world. Sending every felon there. And of course Putin would also help to De nuceiarize that piece of garbage land. Since Felon is already a president there they would Win together.
2
alfi_k Apr 2, 2026 +9
Pretty impressive by Iran winning a war against the US and destroying NATO in less than two months.
9
10pencefredo Apr 2, 2026 +15
Come on guys. Pull together and make a non-combative deal with Iran. If the US are not part of it or we have to pay in Yuan, that's on the US. They alienated themselves. We need to face up to their new future. I just hope Iran will be on board.
15
CharlesAtHome Apr 2, 2026 +6
Europe didn't take the bait and get involved in any war with Iran, and they're probably all willing to pay whatever toll Iran asks for since their backs are against the wall. As an end result, we get more inflation and pay more for fuel long term (governments could cut fuel tax like Australia has already done), focus even more heavily on renewables to avoid this situation again, essentially lose the US as a military ally, Iran wins financially and we maybe see the end of the petrodollar. I can't imagine what happens between Israel and Iran though. Probably just diminishing attacks until it fizzles out by Summer.
6
Squeezy_Lemon Apr 2, 2026 +28
The orangutan created a deadlock situation and washed his hands.
28
CorrodedLollypop Apr 2, 2026 +19
That's offensive to Orangutans. They're intelligent, peaceful creatures. I prefer Trumpanzee, they're both loud, aggressive, bad smelling creatures that also both love to fling shit around.
19
apexxin Apr 2, 2026 +2
Not for nothin, but orangutans are violent creatures, just a bit more predictable than chimps
2
ProfetF9 Apr 2, 2026 +28
Trump: EU better spend more on defence, they are a paper tiger EU spends more but buy from EU countries Trump: NOT LIKE THAT :(
28
SqareBear Apr 2, 2026 +16
They should invite Iran. Im not kidding.
16
MJ-Franklin Apr 2, 2026 +10
Can the US be absent from everything ever going forward?
10
10-4-man Apr 2, 2026 +5
we going to have the second iteration of NATO.....No America Treaty Organization...
5
Own_Replacement8933 Apr 2, 2026 +124
This is a pretty big deal, not just because the strait is effectively shut, but because the US is actively sitting it out. Trump basically told everyone "go get your own oil" and the UK actually called that bluff. The two-phase plan makes sense on paper, diplomacy first then military cleanup after a ceasefire. But the elephant in the room is Iran. They’re still launching missiles and have zero incentive to negotiate while the strait is their best leverage. And without US warships in the mix, a 35-nation coalition is mostly just a lot of countries agreeing that someone else should fix the problem. Also worth noting: several of those 35 nations (like Australia) have openly said their navies aren't really ready for this kind of high-intensity mission. So the gap between political will and actual capability is pretty wide. Realistically, this is the UK doing damage control and trying to keep global energy markets from totally collapsing. But until there's a ceasefire, the strait stays shut and Iran knows it.
124
SoberBobMonthly Apr 2, 2026 +127
Thats a bit of an odd interpretation, when Iranian officials have given the go ahead for any countries offering dipolmacy and working with them, the ability to have their ships leave the strait. Also the USA is not "sitting this one out", we are excluding them. They were not invited.  As an Australian yeah of course we dont have a f****** navy big enough. We have a population one quater the goddamned size of Iran itself, let alone America or the UK. We are part of the talks because after the Gas shut downs, I think we are now second in  the world for LNG gas exports.  We understand that diplomacy works, and trade works. We choose diplomacy. 
127
Nikiaf Apr 2, 2026 +32
>Also the USA is not "sitting this one out", we are excluding them. They were not invited.  This is an extremely important distinction. They are not choosing not to participate, they were intentionally not included in this gathering. US soft power is eroding away by the minute right now.
32
Fitz911 Apr 2, 2026 +4
And the should get used to the feeling.
4
BWOTAFM Apr 2, 2026 +37
Mate, way to subtle for these cunts from the US. Let me try. You US cunts are cooked. You fucked up all your soft power and yes we will be able to do a deal because you fuckers are done on the international stage. Sit down and be the stupid cunts that you have always been. Your time in the sun is done, your as special as my shit and f*** off and just stay in your place. Talking is always better then killing people, and if you guys could get that through your thick f****** heads, maybe just maybe you would have less school shootings. F*** me you guys have become a f****** joke on every level, so do the rest of the world a favour and just stay in you fucked up "best cuntrey in the world" and stay the f*** out of the rest of the world's affairs for the rest of time, for the benefit of you know the majority of the population on earth. Sit in your shit hole and just pretend like the US is the world so the rest of us can move on and not deal with your shit.
37
Cirias Apr 2, 2026 +13
Well said mate
13
ninjeti Apr 2, 2026 +3
They really are cooked. I think most of them cant even realize it since their media is all about "us the best" and are really ignoring anything else happening in the world. In their own bubble. A lot of these poor schmucks will feel like they got hit by a shovel when everything plays out. There is a quote in Margin call movie that sums things up: "nah, they're all fucked". If someone is dumb enough for second term of orange man, well... there it is. Its sad tho... i guess they had it too good and wanted to make doomsday out of boredom.
3
thereoncewasahat Apr 2, 2026 +45
Even with the US we're not opening the strait by force. It would be a forever war, thousands at least dead, trillions wasted. We're going to have to stop bombing and pay them for transit. We are so fucked for years, if not decades.
45
TtotheC81 Apr 2, 2026 +48
Oh, the U.S is *never* going to live this down. Not only did they fail to bomb Iran into surrender, but they failed to secure or destroy Iran's nuclear weapon capabilities, and they actually woke Iran up to the chokehold it has over international shipping and the Middle East at large. That's a mountain-sized pile of clusterfuck for the world to deal with, now.
48
thereoncewasahat Apr 2, 2026 +26
Well said. The Iranians probably believed prior to the war that America had the ability to lift a blockade on the strait with relative ease. Now they can just apply the choke anytime they feel pressure. They are much stronger than they were before. That, and everyone blames Israel; that will come back to bite them.
26
Worthyness Apr 2, 2026 +2
Also the US got rid of the old aged religious men at the top and the Iranians replaced them with much younger religious zealots, so their leadership is gonna be in place for decades to come now.
2
Kriztauf Apr 2, 2026 +19
And the Israelis will be pissed about that since the IRGC is still getting money and will likely resume bombing intermittently, complicating the situation
19
thereoncewasahat Apr 2, 2026 +27
The Israelis being pissed off is not a bad thing after everything they have done to us.
27
Witty_Formal7305 Apr 2, 2026 +32
Israel can eat shit. Isreal and Trump dragged their ass on the carpet and left a trail of shit in every direction and now the rest of the world has to pay to clean it up, despite having nothing to do with this bullshit, if they're pissed about it that's honestly a bonus at this point, f*** em.
32
_k0kane_ Apr 2, 2026 +8
Isn't this the plan? Secure venezuela supply. Deny the world the strait, impose complications. Israel offers pipelines through itself Usa offers to sell its oil. Russia regains demand. Solid plan
8
thickwhiteduck Apr 2, 2026 +6
It’s difficult to think of any other logical reason right now.
6
urbanmark Apr 2, 2026 +5
You have failed to take into consideration the potential to make money. Private companies will be competing to rebuild the destroyed infrastructure, pump the oil and ship it as quickly as possible. It will not be years. It will be months. If it was hospitals and schools we were talking about, then it would be years.
5
truttatrotta Apr 2, 2026 +8
The 35 countries will work together and with others to diplomatically open it. If Iran isn’t interested in diplomacy they’ll build a military coalition. That’s those countries fixing it. No doubt Trump will get butthurt and cause more problems because he has no idea about diplomacy and won’t want others succeeding where he’s clearly been defeated.
8
LordSeismic Apr 2, 2026 +7
And what will it take for a ceasefire? Trump wont peace out until the Strait is free and open. Iran wont peace out until Trump leaves and possibly accepts some unflattering terms (reparations maybe?). Even if Trump just packs up and leaves theres nothing stopping Iran from imposing taxes.
7
Own_Replacement8933 Apr 2, 2026 +5
That's the real deadlock. Trump wants the strait open as a condition for peace. Iran wants Trump out as a condition for even talking. Neither side can get what they want without giving up exactly what they're holding onto. And you're right, even if the US packs up tomorrow, Iran's not just going to let tankers pass for free. They'll call it a "fee" or "security guarantee" or something. So the strait technically opens, but now everyone pays Tehran a toll. That's not a win.it's just a different kind of loss. Honestly? I don't see a clean exit here. Someone's going to have to blink first, and neither side looks ready to do that. Probably means this drags on until the economic pain back home forces one of them to fold. My money's on the US blinking eventually—public opinion and election cycles have a short memory. But by then, Iran's already won the long game.
5
NoForm5443 Apr 2, 2026 +6
The solution is not more missiles, or navy operations. It's diplomacy. Yes, that actually means paying Iran for using the strait
6
eelam_garek Apr 2, 2026 +8
It's a opportunity for Iran to come across as reasonable I suppose. Not saying they'll take it. But imagine how embarrassing it would look for Trump if this led to the strait being opened and his military campaign having to cease. Even Trump can't claim he won if he wasn't sat at the table.
8
urbanmark Apr 2, 2026 +4
We could seize control and then tariff the U.S boats.
4
thickwhiteduck Apr 2, 2026 +3
They’re talking about putting a toll on it. I’d guess there’ll be different rates depending on whose ship it is. Could be interesting.
3
Legitimate-Wash-6336 Apr 2, 2026 +4
It’s almost like Iran got the world by the balls and trump “thinks” he can brute force his own fuckup. The straight could have stayed open for all if trump wasn’t in the Epstein files. All for a pdf file.
4
MarkG1 Apr 2, 2026 +7
>All for a pdf file. Just put paedophile or if you're not feeling brave enough put sex offender.
7
_x_oOo_x_ Apr 2, 2026 +14
The longer term solution is phasing out fossil fuels completely ([currently](https://grid.iamkate.com) only 15.6% of the UK's electricity comes from fossil fuels, so the major remaining frontier is vehicles). China as always will be the w***** as the largest manufacturer of solar panels, batteries, EVs, wind turbines and so on.
14
WhiskeySourWithIce Apr 2, 2026 +6
And what of all the other non-fuel products and derivatives the world desperately needs to be shipped through the strait?
6
BecauseBatman01 Apr 2, 2026 +4
Honestly if I was in government I would come to realize you can’t trust Trump for anything. Dude just goes with the flow of whoever is throwing money at him and is quick to bite back at you at a moments whim. It’s best to just find solutions outside of the US and get them back in the table once Trump is out of office. You just can’t deal with people like him.
4
Ok_Rip_2119 Apr 2, 2026 +4
Just block all USA related ships and let others go through.
4
Mass_And_Sass Apr 2, 2026 +3
*UK to host talks with 35 countries on reopening Straight of Hormuz, US absent.* This is precisely what my country used to do. The alarm bells in every single think tank and other organization should be ringing loudly and not stop until this person is out of office. The amount of time it’s going to take to mend, if it’s *ever* able to be salvaged to get back to the same level before is (incoming not educated guess) 25+ years. Again, just a guess and i feel like it’s going to be longer than that if at all.
3
SniperGunner Apr 2, 2026 +4
Nobody unites countries like Trump does. He’s the best at uniting countries.
4
MassiveAd5466 Apr 2, 2026 +5
In a matter of days, Iran is going to realize it doesn't need to sell oil to make billions. It just needs to control the Strait of Hormuz. Thank you Donald Trump for making gas more expensive.
5
inminm02 Apr 2, 2026 +3
This unironically is starting to look like a reversed version of the suez crisis.
3
DARKKRAKEN Apr 2, 2026 +2
Except, Canada fucked the U.K. They were one of the biggest voices against the U.K and France when it came to the Suez Crisis. Probably because they were sucking up to the U.S.
2
International-Ad3147 Apr 2, 2026 +8
May actually be a productive convo
8
lm28ness Apr 2, 2026 +3
Imagine Iran allowing all ships to pass free of charge except those that head to the US or Israel, but I wonder how they would enforce something like that.
3
milkonyourmustache Apr 2, 2026 +3
Everyone should really just abandon the petrodollar, it's the perfect opportunity to do so. The US has abused their position of priviledge for long enough.
3
ledow Apr 2, 2026 +3
oh, oh, oh.... Someone HAS TO use the phrase "back of the queue" when America wants in on that....
3
Life-is-beautiful- Apr 2, 2026 +3
At \*SOME\* point, I would like to know how the US think tanks didn't game plan Iran taking over and control the Hormuz strait. It is not just about this issue, but we are trusting these guys with our national security. I'm concerned.
3
ImmediateDentist1269 Apr 2, 2026 +3
Feel like it's important that Iran attends.
3
scarab1001 Apr 2, 2026 +9
It won't work whilst America trying to decide what it's war aims actually were. May not work after that either. But after the abject failure of America at least someone is beginning to think how to de-escalate the mess the Orange Cockwomble created.
9
keepitfriend Apr 2, 2026 +6
Mate, what won’t work? Making a deal with Iran? Is the us going to attack European ships?
6
primalbluewolf Apr 2, 2026 +2
> Is the us going to attack European ships Certainly wouldn't rule it out...
2
yourfaceisfakenews Apr 2, 2026 +13
what are they gonna talk about ? sanctioning US and Israel to stop the attacks ? Is there anything these 35-37 countries can do to open the strait ?
13
Dingcock Apr 2, 2026 +40
Stopping the attacks isn't going to reverse Irans control of the strait Neither will continuing to attack
40
FuguSandwich Apr 2, 2026 +22
This is the fundamental problem. You can't reopen the Strait and keep it open by force. Conversely, if Trump just TACOs and withdraws the Strait remains closed. Starting a war with Iran was always going to lead to a quagmire. That's why, despite valid issues with the Iranian regime, Biden, Obama, Bush II, Clinton, and Bush I all decided against it. It's also why id didn't happen during the first Trump administration, because there were enough intelligent and experienced people surrounding him. Now, he's surrounded by a bunch of imbecile sycophants, so it happened.
22
Ok-Explanation1990 Apr 2, 2026 +11
If Trump bails and US withdraws (claiming some hollow victory perhaps to disguise defeat), will it actually stay closed? Or will collective, peaceful negotiating with 35 more reasonable, less volatile, violent nations - most of whom opposed this whole thing in the first place, prevail?
11
AdProud555 Apr 2, 2026 +5
Not without paying the toll...
5
Mizunomafia Apr 2, 2026 +6
You could simply use diplomacy and enter a deal of agreement with Iran, where they allow these 35 nations to get their oil. For instance by introducing fair trade. Excluding the US ofc.
6
Dingcock Apr 2, 2026 +4
That's true, but currently Iran considers many of those 35 nations allies of the US, so are enemies of Iran. Not sure a deal can be made under those conditions, atleast currently.
4
TrickshotCandy Apr 2, 2026 +22
We need to prepare for when Trump just fucks off, leaving a big old mess. Whole world cannot be continuously held to ransom by one idiot and his friends. Everyone is looking at ways to exclude US as much as possible. Trust has certainly been broken.
22
vinnybawbaw Apr 2, 2026 +11
>Is there anything these 35-37 countries can do to open the strait ? Switching to Yuan /s
11
wailferret Apr 2, 2026 +4
Except China doesn't want a strong yuan since it would kill their exporting cost advantage. They deliberately manipulate their currency to make it weaker against USD/Euro/JPY.
4
mmoore327 Apr 2, 2026 +7
It's about what to do after the US admits failure and just walks away...
7
keepitfriend Apr 2, 2026 +4
Yes they can sign a treaty with Iran 
4
ricktaylor78 Apr 2, 2026 +2
It’s simple: Don’t attack Iran and don’t be an ally of US
2
Confident-Visual7651 Apr 2, 2026 +2
The one to cause this whole mess just decides not to show up to school the day its time to have the talk.
2
Zimmonda Apr 2, 2026 +2
Trump said "congress wont let me withdraw from NATO? Fine I'll get us kicked out instead"
2
moan_of_the_arc Apr 2, 2026 +2
If this goes through, the petro dollar will take a hit?
2
ComprehensiveWin2841 Apr 2, 2026 +2
Cool. Cool. Cool… so we are the Russia now.
2
SwedishLenn Apr 2, 2026 +2
Release the Epstein files.
2
username_choose_you Apr 2, 2026 +2
Omg. Countries working together to offset the damage caused by Trump? Easter miracles do exist
2
kidsally Apr 2, 2026 +2
Somebody has to be the grownup in the room.
2
← Back to Board