· 168 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 16, 2026 at 7:49 PM

UK transfers about 1 billion dollars in frozen Russian assets to Ukraine

Posted by DramaMoonveil

UK contributes around $1 billion to Ukraine under G7 Russian asset-backed loan program
The Kyiv Independent
UK contributes around $1 billion to Ukraine under G7 Russian asset-backed loan program
The United Kingdom contributed 752 million pounds (around $1 billion) in frozen Russian assets to Ukraine under the Group of Seven’s Extraordinary Revenue Acceleration initiative, a loan program financed by profits generated from immobilized Russian assets.
🚩 Report this post

168 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
Melodic-Doubt7777 Apr 16, 2026 +3579
Money is the only thing the billionaire/oligarchy class cares about. Congrats to the UK!!!
3579
bongohappypants Apr 16, 2026 +769
Untrue!! They also care about children. Maybe too much. Like, a LOT.
769
Somo_99 Apr 16, 2026 +249
"care" is being a little too generous
249
muchawesomemyron Apr 16, 2026 +53
They care if there’s not enough being born. Watch the headlines shift from “why are millennials not having enough kids?” to “why are gen z not having enough kids?” in a few years.
53
dogfaced_pony_soulja Apr 17, 2026 +56
A few years? lol! [Fox News Analyst Says It's a 'Problem' That Teens Are Not Having Babies, Blames Young People for Declining Fertility Rate](https://people.com/fox-news-its-a-problem-that-teens-are-not-having-babies-11949524). That article is from People magazine… two days ago.
56
muchawesomemyron Apr 17, 2026 +25
I stand corrected. Also, what the frick?
25
recctyl Apr 17, 2026 +15
then again, its Fox. aka pure comedy.
15
xteve Apr 17, 2026 +14
It's also Christian. Control of the womb is pure church. And babies as the best recruits - that's Christian too.
14
ishtaria_ranix Apr 17, 2026 +6
Abrahamic in general.
6
bloomdecay Apr 17, 2026 +6
Anyone who thinks teenagers should be having babies belongs on several watchlists.
6
Zapp_Rowsdower_ Apr 17, 2026 +6
Ummm…Fox is already running with the ‘crisis’ of teens not having kids.
6
Stephen1729 Apr 18, 2026 +2
But they don't care enough not to stop waging war on the living standards on the working and middle classes. There ia a perfect correlation between the decline of the middle class and the rise of the billionaire class. I do not think that is an accident
2
AnunnakiResetButton Apr 16, 2026 +28
they consume children
28
Lauma_2025 Apr 17, 2026 +3
I feel bad for all the victims of Jimmy Savile. The monster died peacefully of old age.
3
RollingMeteors Apr 17, 2026 +3
>They also care about children. Maybe too much. Like, a LOT. ¿¡Is *all* the work around here done by children?! *¡Not the whipping!*
3
dan-the-daniel Apr 17, 2026 +22
We're calling them the Epstein class now.
22
Dear_Chasey_La1n Apr 17, 2026 +5
Power. Power you are looking for. They need power to get wealth, status and all that. Taking away their global power is what's needed. These fucks, every single one of them including their families need to lose access to the world by preventing them from traveling. A billion lost they earn tomorrow (literally). That doesn't hurt that's just annoying like a mosquito flying around.
5
Relevant_Tone4741 Apr 16, 2026 +1649
Waiting for Trump to post some outrage over this unfair theft of Russian assets
1649
mikey2505 Apr 16, 2026 +272
Maybe they'll threaten us with nukes...
272
Heisenberg_235 Apr 16, 2026 +90
Where is Lavrov when you need him
90
noir_lord Apr 16, 2026 +17
Has been a while, we need to up our game.
17
schwanzweissfoto Apr 16, 2026 +4
Just send the next billion.
4
letir_ Apr 16, 2026 +6
Lavrov got a bit fall from grace, but he is not fallen out of the window yet. Most of his ramblings are for internal auditory.
6
BoringRedHorse Apr 16, 2026 +3
We haven't heard from him in a while.
3
kdiggydigg Apr 16, 2026 +2
He's probably passed out or, at the very least, blacked out
2
truupe Apr 16, 2026 +10
Once Medvedev chugs a couple bottles of vodka, he'll chime in with his usual drunken threats.
10
Green_Dream20 Apr 16, 2026 +2
They don't need to. They will threaten us with having to repay the money. Any peace agreement with Russia is going to cover what happens to that money. Trump will sign a document giving it back to his best mate Putin. This is what Belgium was afraid of about 6 months ago and no other EU country offered to back then up and guarantee the money should they give it to Ukraine.
2
SwimmingThroughHoney Apr 16, 2026 +70
THE MEAN ENGLAND JUST GAVE AWAY MONEY THAT BELONGS TO THE GREAT AND VERY NICE LEADER OF RUSSIA! TOTALLY UNFAIR!
70
FlyingHippoM Apr 17, 2026 +13
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER
13
schwanzweissfoto Apr 16, 2026 +9
*Perfidious Albion* using its powers of *sudden and inevitable betrayal* for good once in a while.
9
jrr6415sun Apr 16, 2026 +6
england is so weak on crime
6
InvisaBlah Apr 16, 2026 +57
I’d like to recommend that the next Russian asset we send to Ukraine is trump himself, but they don’t deserve that
57
Kona_KG Apr 16, 2026 +7
Considering how apathetic the US admin. is toward actual crises and how fast news expires over here, we'd probably threaten to reenact the battle of Trafalger for a week before moving on. In other words, please do. In all honestly, we might not even notice at this point
7
Kichigai Apr 17, 2026 +4
Depends. If we send Trump, alone, no phone, no entourage, no protective detail, just a lone man with a large print English/Ukrainian phrase book, and give him to Zelenskyy to choose what kind of experience he has, under constant threat of Russian bombardment, that would feel appropriate. Does Zelenskyy give him the perspective of his own experience, as a head of state abandoned by the United States and their security promises after 1991 (a near-peer experience)? Or does he turn Trump loose into the public teniments of Kyiv, and the struggle for warmth and survival amid Russian attacks in the most well defended area of Ukraine (an experience he has condemned average Ukrainians to)? That seems fair. And karmic.
4
willstr1 Apr 17, 2026 +2
He is heavy enough to cause some serious damage to a Russian tank if you dropped him from high enough
2
Whywouldanyonedothat Apr 16, 2026 +5
As he rightly should! Being a Russian asset himself, he's probably scared, he'll be stolen, too
5
Worried-Pomelo3351 Apr 17, 2026 +2
Putin is going to be so pissed. This is great.
2
Moveyourbloominass Apr 16, 2026 +693
Transfer it all.
693
Master_Positive_2772 Apr 16, 2026 +393
I think in a lot of cases the money is funds generated through interest on frozen Russian assets. It's assumed to be better that way because that puts off the legal question of appropriating assets rather than freezing them for another time, assuming it'll be after reparations are decided many years from now.
393
Cookie_Eater108 Apr 16, 2026 +363
It's also quite strategic. Ukraine is no beginner at this. Much of the funds that are sent their way will be directed right back to the nation that helped them through arms purchases- so it would not surprise me if the UK sees a 1 Billion dollar arms purchasing order coming in the near future. The people of the UK get a large manufacturing boost, Ukraine receives weapons- it costs nothing to the UK government itself. The only loser in this arrangement is Russia.
363
Kichigai Apr 17, 2026 +40
>Much of the funds that are sent their way will be directed right back to the nation that helped them through arms purchases Ukraine also isn't stupid or beholden to stupid people. Starmer I would hope isn't so petty as to punish Ukraine for buying arms from the most cost effective source. If they can get a better deal out of Sweden for the Gripen versus the EuroFighter, I don't think Starmer is going to be a vindictive SOB.
40
snuff3r Apr 17, 2026 +46
I don't think EU or The UK give a c*** where the money goes - I'd imagine they trust Ukraine wholeheartedly. Ukraine has a lot of good friends now. With the conflict being in the UKs backyard, all money they send is considered an investment in their own safety, and Ukraine has been very smart with the funds they have access to. Im on the other side of the world (Australia), but I really wish we had stronger strategic links to EU/UK than the US. Despite changing/transitioning slowly and carefully, we're definitely replacing strategic resource arrangements with the US with better arrangements with more trustworthy partners, locally and with EU.
46
bongohappypants Apr 16, 2026 +22
Does Ukraine really need Tactical Morgan 3 Wheelers?
22
StaysAwakeAllWeek Apr 16, 2026 +55
We are manufacturing and sending 120,000 drones to Ukraine this year. That's more than the US military is currently procuring total.
55
Master_Positive_2772 Apr 16, 2026 +66
We produce naval, recon, logistics, strike and fpv drones. All of which we provide to Ukraine. We've also given them all of the stuff which would now be redundant in a future war. 
66
lemlurker Apr 17, 2026 +30
The UK has a pretty killer high tech defense industry... Unlike the us which throws money and numbers at the problem the UK has pulled some really excellent engineering from pretty tight finances
30
Hail-Hydrate Apr 17, 2026 +13
Never underestimate the ingenuity of three blokes in a shed.
13
eric67 Apr 16, 2026 +22
It also means the leverage is maintained. It's held hostage. Spending the principle is like killing the hostage
22
Lexinoz Apr 16, 2026 +18
You are correct, last I heard, it is primarily interest of frozen assets, not the actual assets, for the reasons you stated.
18
SmoothStrawberry7777 Apr 17, 2026 +8
1 billion in interest?!? So they must have tens or hundreds of billion in Russian assets frozen to generate that much interest?
8
bbbbbbbbbblah Apr 17, 2026 +11
the capital city is not derisively called "londongrad" for nothing. Lots of oligarchs have/had a presence here. The banks were only too willing to assist in helping park their assets outside of Russia.
11
noggin-scratcher Apr 17, 2026 +3
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confiscation_of_Russian_central_bank_funds mentions a figure of £25 billion ($33.5 billion) frozen in the UK. Significantly more held in the EU though.
3
letruf Apr 17, 2026 +2
>Since Russia's full-scale [invasion](https://kyivindependent.com/tag/war/) in 2022, G7 countries have frozen approximately $300 billion in Russian sovereign assets. \- says the article we are commenting on.
2
Galaghan Apr 16, 2026 +2
Like what they do with the Euroclear money, indeed.
2
Fellowship_9 Apr 16, 2026 +31
In addition to what other people have said: transferring everything now means there is one less bargaining chip. At the moment the oligarchs will be looking at their frozen assets and trying to decide how to get them released. Once the assets are handed fo Ukraine, they have nothing to hope for, and less to gain by pushing for the war to end.
31
nolok Apr 17, 2026 +8
We're doing something very specific (I use the global we here, european countries doing that). We want to remain a safe place to invest, and not establish a precedent that if you do a war not directly against us but we disagree with, rule of law will still be followed. It's a big part of why europe is considered reliable and loyal. So we don't touch the frozen assets at date of seizure. Maybe they can be used in case of a peace agreement for reparations or whatever, or maybe as incentive for Russia to agree to terms, or whatever. But we use the interests generated, because the fund generated since seizure are considered differently by law. Might seem inefficient, slow, weak, whatever, the point is it's also one of our greatest strenght on the world stage : we can be trusted. The world need more of that, frankly.
8
anders_hansson Apr 17, 2026 +2
For reference, the article says: >The assistance is part of the Group of Seven's (G7) ERA initiative, a 50 billion dollar loan program that uses **profits from frozen Russian sovereign assets** to finance Ukraine and repay the loans. Using profits from the frozen assets is what the EU/Belgium has done for years. I also don't think that the $50B figure is random. The projected need for Ukraine (according to the EU, Ukraine and IMF) for 2026-2027 was ~€140B IIRC (under the assumption that the war ends in 2026). The loan that the EU ended up agreeing on was €90B, which means that it fell short by €50B, which is likely where the G7 efforts (including UK) come in. 90+50=140
2
Pickledpickler29 Apr 16, 2026 +487
UK has led in the coalition of the willing. As much as people can ridicule starmer, he’s done well regarding Ukraine. SLAVA Ukraine 🇺🇦
487
Soft_Author2593 Apr 16, 2026 +143
even Boris did tbf
143
Lexinoz Apr 16, 2026 +79
It's not hard to see the writing on the walls, reading that Russia winning in this war is bad for *everyone*.
79
Pickledpickler29 Apr 16, 2026 +16
It’s a good thing “Russia is winning” ain’t wrote often as they ain’t.
16
hornswoggled111 Apr 17, 2026 +10
Including Russia. The best outcome for them is a big rethink.
10
ThreeHeadedWalrus Apr 17, 2026 +6
Boris campaigned fiercely for brexit, lying to the population and encouraging the collapse of the EU, just like putin wants, f*** the mop head c***
6
Soft_Author2593 Apr 17, 2026 +2
That's why I was a bit surprised when he went hard against them...
2
schwanzweissfoto Apr 16, 2026 +10
*Even evil has standards.*
10
JustGoogleItHeSaid Apr 16, 2026 +8
Go Ukraine! 🇺🇦 ❤️
8
OverFjell Apr 17, 2026 +7
Starmer's domestic messaging may not be the best, but on a world stage, he does us proud imo.
7
Partysausage Apr 17, 2026 +2
I'm from the UK and right leaning, I always try and view all decisions from a neutral standpoint and remove my own bias when deciding if government decisions are a good or bad thing. Iv got to say the only consistent positive is his support of Ukraine. The rest of his policy's and decisions have been pretty shit though !
2
Remarkable_Doubt6665 Apr 16, 2026 +183
Big hug for UK!
183
NynaeveTugdHerBraid Apr 16, 2026 +22
Big, fat hug?
22
Hudsxn98 Apr 16, 2026 +9
Ayyyyy underrated
9
The__Scan Apr 16, 2026 +19
We did something good for once? Awesome! Almost missed that. Hugs back, also Putin can f*** straight off.
19
Safe-Heat1644 Apr 16, 2026 +221
noice
221
omfgeometry Apr 16, 2026 +95
Can't wait for some nuclear threats in the morning
95
UnTides Apr 16, 2026 +54
Hegseth "A Royale with cheese"
54
TechSculpt Apr 16, 2026 +26
Say strait again m***********, I dare you
26
GayMormonPirate Apr 16, 2026 +9
Oh god, I'm laughing but dying of existential 2nd hand embarrassment that the head of the US DoD is this stupid.
9
Heavy_Ad4529 Apr 17, 2026 +2
Ah, Pete "Let's Larp" Hegseth
2
miscfiles Apr 17, 2026 +2
A dis-Loyale with Sleaze
2
parsuval Apr 17, 2026 +7
They've already threatened four of our cities.https://www.businesstoday.in/world/story/sleep-well-europe-russia-threatens-uk-sites-with-potential-strikes-over-ukraine-support-526009-2026-04-16
7
Maeran Apr 17, 2026 +3
If we don't get a nuclear threat we aren't pissing them off enough
3
miscfiles Apr 17, 2026 +2
If Reading is one of them, they'll just be honoured to be counted as a city. For decades, the UK's largest town has wished for this!
2
Ritaredditonce Apr 16, 2026 +10
That's if they can rouse Medvedev from his drunken stupor.
10
AxiosXiphos Apr 16, 2026 +71
Our support of Ukraine is one of the few things I remain patriotic about.
71
GlassjawXVIII Apr 17, 2026 +2
Absolutely!
2
MaximDecimus Apr 16, 2026 +45
Russia is unbelievably stupid. You don’t put your war chest in a different country, take hostile actions against that country, and then expect them to not take it.
45
grchelp2018 Apr 17, 2026 +13
Putin has been telling his oligarchs to take their money out of the west for a long time. Putin wants that money in russia so he can touch it. So Putin might be pissed that Ukraine is getting money for the war but he is happy that the oligarchs are paying the price for not listening to him.
13
FlyingHippoM Apr 17, 2026 +29
Well, in fairness, they can't keep it in Russia because it would get ~~stolen~~ missapropriated.
29
Famous_Cod_6190 Apr 17, 2026 +5
the fact that only one country does this after years of war speeks volumes. We should have done that on a large scale as soon as the first sanctions didn't show any effect.
5
Gbrown546 Apr 17, 2026 +39
The thing that unites the UK politically is our disdain for Russia (specifically Putin and his cronies). They committed a nerve agent attack in our country that led to the death of a British citizen and nearly killed others. Also committed a radioactive attack that killed somebody too on British soil. Ukraine will always get our support.
39
sblahful Apr 17, 2026 +25
Except for Farage and Reform, who repeated all of Russia's talking points in an interview with Laura Kurnesburg just before the last general election in order to get the Russian bots on side.
25
LightDrago Apr 17, 2026 +3
Meanwhile, I get the impression that my fellow citizens in the Netherlands are dragging their feet, with a decent number of people being against spending any money on the Ukraine-Russia war, seemingly completely forgetting that [Russia shot down an airplane](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaysia_Airlines_Flight_17) with almost 200 Dutch citizens.
3
BaitmasterG Apr 16, 2026 +30
We already live rent-free in Putin's head, hopefully this will wind him up a little bit more F*** you Russia
30
jsnxander Apr 16, 2026 +34
LOL! Now they should do the same for Trump family assets.
34
Accomplished_Big7413 Apr 16, 2026 +6
Making them pay for the defense against their own invasion. This is the exact precedent the rest of Europe needs to follow immediately.
6
jeobleo Apr 17, 2026 +7
Excellent. Now crack down on all the real estate in london owned by oligarchs.
7
AdventurousLet548 Apr 16, 2026 +25
Vance will be pissed since he is on Putin’s side.
25
dourdourdour Apr 17, 2026 +13
So that is why the press are after Starmer again. Keep it up Starmer. F*** em.
13
AquariusCamus Apr 16, 2026 +28
Thank you so much UK 🇬🇧
28
Spare_Ad7081 Apr 17, 2026 +6
UK sending a billion in interest from frozen Russian assets to Ukraine. Smart move using the profits without touching the principal. Russia is not going to like this one bit.
6
highdiver_2000 Apr 17, 2026 +2
Just think of the size of principal sum.
2
Shoggahn Apr 16, 2026 +17
Glorious UK
17
Aretirednurse81 Apr 16, 2026 +17
Wonderful news.
17
parker1019 Apr 16, 2026 +19
Get fucked putin
19
imjustsurfin Apr 16, 2026 +10
Go Starmer!!! Well done!!!
10
Debt101 Apr 16, 2026 +13
Proud to be British right now
13
OverFjell Apr 17, 2026 +4
Almost a weird feeling enit
4
PrestigiousVolume821 Apr 16, 2026 +5
if true this is fantastic news
5
Forward_Aspect_7736 Apr 17, 2026 +6
Just when you are feeling down, and listnook post like this appears lets go Ukraine
6
badger707_XXL Apr 16, 2026 +13
Thanks fantastic Brits!
13
100farts Apr 16, 2026 +8
Slava Ukraini! F*** yea!
8
K-tel Apr 16, 2026 +9
This is the way! Making Putey pay for his war has got to annoy the hell out of him.
9
poestavern Apr 16, 2026 +8
Thank you UK. You’re doing the right thing.
8
ynys_red Apr 17, 2026 +4
Nice one. Back Ukraine. Back the right horse.
4
ukuleles1337 Apr 17, 2026 +4
Thats fuckin amazing hahahaha! F*** you, russia!!!
4
Gone2georgia Apr 17, 2026 +4
Well done UK.
4
Reddit_2_2024 Apr 17, 2026 +3
Thank you United Kingdom!
3
filletofishupsai Apr 17, 2026 +3
More, please! But amazing work from the UK!!
3
deran6ed Apr 17, 2026 +4
Amazing
4
Any-Programmer6702 Apr 17, 2026 +4
Big move by the UK. 1 billion dollars is a massive boost for Ukraine's defense at a critical time. Every bit counts!
4
Ok_Professi Apr 16, 2026 +8
♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️
8
angrytroll123 Apr 16, 2026 +7
I've gladly contributed the 6000th upvote. Great news.
7
Master-Data-8765 Apr 16, 2026 +6
Noo, the integrity of banks not to f*** with your money. But good for Ukraine 🇺🇦
6
Only_Beautiful_9698 Apr 16, 2026 +6
Excellent 👍
6
RoyalGovernment3034 Apr 16, 2026 +3
Fabulous
3
Entire_Dog_5874 Apr 16, 2026 +3
Wonderful news.
3
thirteennineteen Apr 16, 2026 +3
Now that’s what I’m talmbaud!! Literally confiscate the money and redistribute it. It’s fairly straightforward.
3
ThatShadyJack Apr 16, 2026 +3
Suck eggs Putin you fascist
3
Fit-Significance-436 Apr 16, 2026 +3
Tremendous news
3
1800-5-PP-DOO-DOO Apr 17, 2026 +3
Checkmate scumbags. 
3
General-Researcher-2 Apr 17, 2026 +3
Stop lying in every news report about Russian assets. They are frozen and have not been transferred to anyone. This is about the interest, not the assets themselves. It’s the same story every time.
3
VanGrants Apr 16, 2026 +5
LETS F****** GO, THIS IS JUST A START
5
haversack77 Apr 16, 2026 +10
Excellent work Starmer. Now go and give Putin a bloody nose, Ukraine.
10
Remarkable_Beach_545 Apr 16, 2026 +3
Is this profits from the assets, or the assets themselves?
3
Summer_VonSturm Apr 17, 2026 +5
It'll be the profits.
5
SwedishBoiKneeAttack Apr 17, 2026 +4
God save the king! Thank you UK!
4
rumoku Apr 16, 2026 +7
That’s not new initiative, and just latest tranche. G7 essentially sending profit from frozen Russian assets to Ukraine.
7
Trianle Apr 16, 2026 +2
Thank you!
2
trolley_trackz Apr 16, 2026 +2
No cards ukraine all the sudden has a jack and a 4. It could work!
2
Single-Wrangler3540 Apr 16, 2026 +2
Tally Hoe
2
ZR-71 Apr 16, 2026 +2
1 billion sounds like it could purchase a few drones and kill a few russian boys. good job, world.
2
beast_within_me Apr 16, 2026 +2
Is this the money that UK froze after the sale of Chelsea FC?
2
Barbu-Genial Apr 16, 2026 +2
Excellente idée, espérons que ce n'est que le début.
2
iAmMr_WHO Apr 17, 2026 +2
Awesome
2
That70s_Scrubs Apr 17, 2026 +2
Wow that’s big news
2
Ready_Mycologist8612 Apr 17, 2026 +2
🤌🏼🤌🏼🤌🏼🤌🏼🤘🏼🤘🏼🤘🏼🤘🏼💪🏼💪🏼💪🏼💪🏼
2
s3ct01d Apr 17, 2026 +2
Great news! Go UK!
2
FrozenChocoProduce Apr 16, 2026 +8
Russian: Don't you dare steal our money! UK: Staring in his eyes, calmly giving his enemy the money. "Nice day chap, i'nnit?"
8
xflashbackxbrd Apr 16, 2026 +4
Eu gonna do the same imminently
4
BadFootyTakes Apr 16, 2026 +2
Next transfer Abramovich's money.
2
PourSomeSugar69_420 Apr 17, 2026 +3
NOYCE. this is f****** great news.
3
The_Last_Bohican Apr 16, 2026 +6
All of Russia’s frozen assets should be given to Ukraine. We all know this war is illegal and Russia has to pay.
6
-4Q- Apr 16, 2026 +7
For once, my country is doing the right thing. I don't care too much about the missteps that get all the coverage, it's predictable that the good things Labour have done are not reported fairly by our biased media, but I'm proud that my Labour government are supporting Ukraine and telling tRump to go f*** himself both here and with regard to his war crimes in Iran.
7
needlestack Apr 16, 2026 +5
This is the way to do it. You want to invade a non-belligerent country? The world must make you pay for it. Literally.
5
unitedbsd Apr 16, 2026 +5
Good step in De-dollarization.
5
Koalateka Apr 17, 2026 +5
I don't get all the praise I see in this post. No country is going to trust the Dollar system anymore. This is a big step for the Brics taking over.
5
grammar_fozzie Apr 16, 2026 +2
More, please. Then focus on our billionaires and send that money to health insurance subsidies.
2
Numerous-Ad6460 Apr 17, 2026 +2
Should've been done within the first year. And it shoul be ALL of the frozen assets.
2
FlaminBollocks Apr 17, 2026 +2
This is the way
2
New-History7971 Apr 17, 2026 +2
Oh, yeah ! F*** ruzzia! Slava Ucraina!
2
PaleontologistNo7385 Apr 17, 2026 +1
YES!!!!!!!
1
BrittEklandsStuntBum Apr 17, 2026 +1
Sometimes we still do things right.
1
DatabaseMaterial0 Apr 17, 2026 +1
Hope something similar happens with the money the administration has pocketed through their corruption and cronyism.
1
yourmothersgun Apr 17, 2026 +1
Do me next!
1
Even-Buffalo-7179 Apr 17, 2026 +1
There are 300 billion assets that are left, and I’m not entirely sure if these are profits from frozen assets, or the actual assets themselves
1
smileola Apr 17, 2026 +1
Loool land vs money
1
HussingtonHat Apr 17, 2026 +1
"We shall bomb here, here and here!" "Cool. Hey guys, you want this dudes boat?"
1
UrsaMajor7th Apr 17, 2026 +1
Pre-reparations.
1
← Back to Board