[The UK is already in the middle of a major medication shortage.](https://mediwatch.co.uk/guides/medicine-shortage-uk-complete-list) Dozens of medications are out of stock, it is just not really reported on. My pharmacist was able to find me an alternative, but the medication I was prescribed has now been out of stock for 18 months.
1318
cheerylittlebottom84Mar 28, 2026
+95
Yep, my slow-release propranolol has been out of stock for months. They've switched me to a higher dose of fast-release instead, which... kinda works but not really. Dreading it getting any worse.
95
DuckmemansMar 28, 2026
+20
80mg sr? Cos the 160mg is back in stock but it's the 80 I need. Been on it for over a decade.
Instant release has given me nothing but problems.
20
cheerylittlebottom84Mar 28, 2026
+3
Yep! IR hasn't been too awful but it's definitely not achieving what the SR did.
3
DuckmemansMar 29, 2026
+3
Ah that's good to hear.
I've had my ADHD medication stopped because the IR version isn't keeping my heart rate under control.
When/if I find it's back in stock anywhere I'll let you know
3
SleepingguitarmanMar 28, 2026
+1
Huh, seems weird they'd do that instead of prescribing a lower amount of instant release that'd be equal to what your blood concentration would of been on the slow release, but have you take it 2-3 times a day.
1
cheerylittlebottom84Mar 28, 2026
+2
They did originally - I used to be on SR and IR together, to cover all bases - but it wasn't having any effect at all so they changed to the higher dose. They tried splitting it into twice daily but that didn't work out either. Really, I just need the SR back but there's no sign of it being in stock. I'm seeing my doctor soon so I'm going to float the idea of going on 160mg SR until the 80mg is back; it's overkill really as 80mg always worked great but the IR alone just isn't cutting it.
I've had issues getting mometasone cream over the past year too but that seems to be resolved now.
2
SleepingguitarmanMar 29, 2026
+2
Well hey i'm really sorry to hear that you haven't been able to get the medications you need. I'm on quite a few meds myself and i know how important and can be to be on the right things.
I hope you're able to find something that works relatively well while you're waiting for the medication that works for you becomes available again. Best of luck friend!
2
zzazzzzMar 28, 2026
+667
brexit gains really showing fruit by now..
man i really hope the UK govt can stop stepping on its d*** and get their head back in the game soon.
667
JacobK101Mar 29, 2026
+7
unfortunately after the starmerpocalypse it's pretty likely that reform will win the next election, and it's all but guaranteed they'll do Brexit, but dumber
7
SpamgrenadeMar 28, 2026
+104
The price of basic over the counter stuff shot up after brexit.
104
ermagerditssupermanMar 28, 2026
+19
I have huge sympathy for you guys - the US has had a shortage on stimulant meds for about 2 years, and while it's marginally better now (depending on where in the country you live), I know so many people across the nation who had to go without their meds for weeks to months. It was only 3 weeks for me, and my work speed & quality went down enough for my manager to notice and reach out to see what was going on. (I was able to find a supply that was double my dose, but could be manually split in half) . I also once couldn't get my migraine meds for one month during storm season (huge migraine trigger for me), and ended up bedbound in pain for several days.
I hope you all are able to get your medications soon!
19
DespairTravelerMar 29, 2026
+7
Unfortunately stimulant shortage in US isn't some kind of mistake. It's by design plan by DEA. They have been maliciously manipulating wrong quotas for producers for last few years to produce this effect.
7
sad_handjobMar 29, 2026
+1
how do you know this?
1
johnnyspiralMar 28, 2026
+50
p******* loser here, most are those are old and aren't currently an issue and some of them aren't shortages at all.
50
wolfgang169Mar 29, 2026
+3
Yeah this list is bad
3
sedahrenMar 28, 2026
+6
Yep, that's why I went cold turkey on my SNRIs 3 weeks ago. It's been a ride!
6
1egg_4uMar 29, 2026
+2
You are really not supposed to do that
You have to taper off of them carefully or you could give yourself serotonin syndrome
2
sedahrenMar 29, 2026
+1
Well yes I am aware. But after phoning around every p******* in my area with no luck I didn't have a lot of choice. Tried to get a GP appt to at least get some sertraline, but no luck.
1
Emu1981Mar 28, 2026
+3
I love that you call that a medicine shortage when the [Australian equivalent](https://apps.tga.gov.au/prod/MSI/search/) has 402 current shortages listed and 97 anticipated shortages.
3
BlueberryPianoMar 28, 2026
+3
The first sentence of the linked article:
> There are currently 215 active medicine shortages
Calling it "dozens" is really understating it, but if you'd read any of the article you'd know it's not a mere 24 medications they're talking about.
3
BWWFCMar 28, 2026
-3
back in my day, every prescription was... "more beer"
-3
iAmFridayFaceMar 28, 2026
+29
Ironically, I'm on medication now because my old prescription was always more beer lol
29
SpiritedPark4511Mar 28, 2026
+7
My matron at school did once tell me that drinking Guinness would help my glandular fever. My 97yr old grandma also swears by it.
7
Marsa_AdamslMar 28, 2026
+1843
Wild how quickly "regional conflict" turns into "your p******* can't fill your prescription." Global supply chains are so fragile it's honestly terrifying.
1843
Taako_CrossMar 28, 2026
+270
We literally saw what happened during Covid then when that ship got stuck in the Suez Canal. No lessons were learned.
270
Johannes_PMar 28, 2026
+89
And how COVID itself strained worldwide logistic chains.
89
fevered_visionsMar 28, 2026
+37
Was Covid really 6 years ago now? Damn.
37
markpbMar 28, 2026
+978
Globalisation works best when leaders act somewhat rationally.
Thanks America, solid job!
978
neroseleneMar 28, 2026
+406
Still baffles me that nobody was able to reign the administration in and not beat it into their skulls that this whole attack on Iran was a TERRIBLE idea.
Then I remember they fired anyone with more then a single braincell.
406
Lard_BaronMar 28, 2026
+241
There’s a filter to get into positions of influence in Trumps administration. They have to believe the 2020 election was rigged.
Anyone who’s got through that filter’s brain is cooked.
241
Tyler10274Mar 28, 2026
+51
The other filter is if your throat can accept around 4 inches.
51
1337duckMar 28, 2026
+16
*It doesn't get that far, though.
16
OsmeOxysMar 28, 2026
+8
4? Let's be realistic here... He definitely measures the taint.
8
KyanpeMar 28, 2026
+25
It's not about truly believing it. I don't think any of his associates actually believe that horse shit. It's a question of whether they'll peddle his fake narrative to keep manipulating their fan base.
25
masta030Mar 28, 2026
+44
One of the senior fema officials claims to have teleported to a waffle House, many of these people are crazier than you'd think
44
cannot_walk_barefootMar 28, 2026
+8
And too many groups wanting this. The Israel lobby, the weirdo evangelical end time extremists, probably the defence contractors. Trump is an idiot, if you want war he's very easy to persuade
8
kace91Mar 28, 2026
+55
It took the whole western world to convince them to avoid invading *Europe.*
55
VanvincentMar 28, 2026
+9
It’s a terrifying thought that we might even now have been at war with the US. Danish troops were fully prepared for an American attack. Perhaps the only thing that prevented an invasion of Greenland was Israel and Saudi Arabia pushing the US administration to war with Iran instead.
9
CuteLine3Mar 28, 2026
+20
I'm baffled that people are still baffled that the cadre of "wearing the oversized shoes the Führer picked for them" is doing anything but furiously nodding at everything he wants to do.
20
fevered_visionsMar 28, 2026
+28
> reign the administration in
rein in. reign is what a king does; rein is what you use to control a horse
28
pixepoke2Mar 29, 2026
+3
Don’t rain on their parade
3
markpbMar 28, 2026
+15
When you surround yourself with sycophantic yes-men, there’s no one left to tell you when you’re making a really big mistake.
15
Hairy_AlMar 28, 2026
+8
See also - Elon Musk
8
Johannes_PMar 28, 2026
+6
See how Putin's henchmen tell him that they would take Kyiv in three days.
6
[deleted]Mar 28, 2026
+15
[removed]
15
pigsbountyMar 28, 2026
+3
That shouldn’t baffle you. These people don’t have any sense.
3
SaratrooperMar 28, 2026
+1
It's either truly unchecked bad ideas, or their billionaire backers are intentionally telling them to do those things to destroy everyone and everything.
1
TheRadBaronMar 28, 2026
+1
The American voter had to spend ten years forcing out of everyone competent or honorable before this could happen.
That's honestly reflects pretty well on the systems at play (and badly on the voters).
1
Zealot_AlecMar 28, 2026
+1
May MAGA lose 100 House seats in midterms
1
manical1Mar 28, 2026
+1
haha. surprise!like pearl harbor. heee heee.
the administration didn't really play nice.
1
Cubey42Mar 29, 2026
+1
Because the entire administration is fighting a holy war
1
OverthinkingWineauxMar 29, 2026
+1
It's a distraction from the trumpstein files, the chaos is the point
1
hollow114Mar 29, 2026
+1
They made sure to specifically get rid of those people
1
PolicyWonkaMar 28, 2026
+25
Exactly. Globalization is a major stabilization force in the world. When people felt upon each other to produce goods and services, there’s pressure to remain cooperative.
25
LystAPMar 29, 2026
+3
The vast majority of people alive today have only ever living in the age of globalization. People don't understand what the end of globalization really means - not yet.
3
TheWhiteManticoreMar 28, 2026
+11
Election has consequences….
11
8JHF8Mar 28, 2026
+19
The crazy thing about that is that the people who won are saying this. To me that sounds like, "haha you elected us so f--k you". To be clear, I didn't elect them.
19
The_Vee_Mar 29, 2026
+1
We found out how vulnerable globalization is during COVID. It's about securing resources now. Europe is very dependent on oil coming from the Strait of Hormuz, as is China. Whoever becomes the dominant leader in the middle east will have an economic upper hand.
1
TheoremaEgregiumMar 28, 2026
+60
Every redundancy, fallback or stockpile eats into profits.
60
c0reMMar 28, 2026
+114
That’s the point of globalization. If everyone is interdependent, nations are less likely to fight. It’s also more efficient when it works.
Basically maintains peace because fighting looks like cutting off your left hand with your right. We become a single large interconnected entity.
But if any leaders are too stupid to figure this out the whole entity dies together.
114
ZephensisMar 28, 2026
+23
Making life sustaining medicine supplies dependent on international relations is dumb though since there are tons of things like natural disasters that could also interrupt the flow of goods. Pharmaceutical manufacturing shouldn't be exclusively on the other side of the planet.
23
TheDwarvenGuyMar 28, 2026
+10
The thing is that pharmeceuticals are highly specialized and are invetiably gonna need some kind of exotic chemical that only has the expertise to be produced on the other side of the planet
10
PopingheadsMar 28, 2026
+15
Well the other problem is it requires everyone to be on the same page to start with. And a lot of countries like Russia will never be. And even excluding war it also is problematic when worker/environment protections are so much worse in countries where production is outsourced too.
So maybe the concept is more flawed than it appears overall.
15
Zombie_CoolMar 28, 2026
+8
The problem is that those *outside* the system still have ways of meddling with those *inside* of it, which is exactly what Russia has done.
Admittedly it was also arrogance on the West's part to believe that globalization would somehow democratize Russia and China and bring them to heel through the the power of Free Market. How's that working out these days?
8
zzazzzzMar 28, 2026
+2
given histry and how often there was war id say it worked pretty well..
2
tlst9999Mar 28, 2026
+7
Well yes. Russia and North Korea being out of the system is already accounted for.
The problem starts when the US, one of the largest players in the system, wants to destroy itself.
7
AlbertaNorth1Mar 28, 2026
+3
That’s where sanctions become a bad tool though. If the only way for your economy to be productive for the average citizen is access to global markets then all sanctions do is hurt the normal population.
3
fevered_visionsMar 28, 2026
+3
It kind of sounds like how nuclear weapons have resulted in fewer great powers conflicts...when it works, it works. When it fails it fails BAD.
3
HaschlolMar 28, 2026
+18
Crazy how pharmaceutical companies aren't forced to produce medication without shipping anything through a region that's been in conflict for almost a century
18
PringlesDuckFaceMar 28, 2026
+4
They basically are forced to though, because people won't support the costs of things like redundancy or domestic production that would alleviate the single points of failure. If there's even one company accepting the risk in order to produce more cheaply, they'll dominate others who can't offer same product at same cost. And if taxpayers don't allow the government to provide necessary funding to compensate, then there's basically no choice.
4
Grinder969Mar 28, 2026
+6
I think that is somewhat more a feature than a bug.
The Bretton wood accords put in place at the end of WW2 creates this system to create major disincentives for governments to start global conflicts like this, as the populace feels it almost immediately and pushes back on the leader (in theory).
6
TheAskewOneMar 28, 2026
+5
>Global supply chains are so fragile it's honestly terrifying.
Covid made that very clear, so thankfully we did what was needed… oh no wait we did absolutely nothing because why prepare when you can pretend everything’s fine and still make profit?
5
Stillwater215Mar 28, 2026
+6
The push for globalization was partially motivated by the idea that wide, interconnected supply chains would limit the appetite for larger conflict. One issue with sustained, long term sanctions on industrial countries is that if they can bring home large parts of their supply chains, they will be less impacted by conflict than their adversaries.
6
smurfsundermybedMar 28, 2026
+3
Nobody could have known that this would happen!
(Everyone knew. This a****** just kept firing people until he got to the ones who were just too stupid to not care)
3
oshinbruceMar 28, 2026
+3
Good thing we learned our lesson from covid and made thibg more resilient... oh wait
3
leidend22Mar 28, 2026
+2
Glad I need like 10 pills per day to stop my arteries from being 100% plugged in times like these. Almost died during covid (not obese).
2
SpamgrenadeMar 28, 2026
+1
Yeah all its taken is an easily avoidable major conflict.
1
boat_hamsterMar 28, 2026
+1
I thought covid disruption was a wake up about how fragile our incredibly complex supply chains were, and that we'd learnt our lesson, and were going to sacrifice a little efficiency for resilience. Apparently not.
1
qrayonsMar 28, 2026
+1
The trade off for increased efficiency is decreased resiliency.
1
Aranthos-FarothMar 28, 2026
+1
Well go be fair it was working completely fine for the last few decades.
Then the American population decided they don’t want to be educated anymore and voted in a turnip.
1
HesthetopMar 29, 2026
+1
A turnip would cause far less destruction.
1
TheDwarvenGuyMar 28, 2026
+1
The premise of the peaceful world order is that the world is too co-dependent on trade for major war to break out
Unfortunatley it's Trump's explicit goal to break that world order
1
Lazy_Membership1849Mar 28, 2026
+1
It's just like the Bronze Age, where trade for material to make bronze is so far, so few, and so centralized that it made it fragile, which is why much of Bronze Age civilization was just erased from the world when the bronze trade collapsed
We just repeat Bronze Age-style trade
1
SassyMoronMar 28, 2026
+1
I mean, if they weren't global they'd be a lot more fragile
1
ThrawDownMar 29, 2026
+1
No fret, the good news is that we earmarked more funding for the bombs we want to send to attack children in the middle east, so technically they wouldnt have the need for medicines, and through trickle down economics, we will eventually get more medicines...
1
JohnnyOnslaughtMar 29, 2026
+1
This was kind of the point of it. To make fighting wars so unpalatable that we wouldn't do it anymore.
1
Lonely_NoyaaaMar 28, 2026
+270
The c**** generic drugs that most people actually take every day, aspirin, ibuprofen, antibiotics, antidepressants, are the ones with no financial cushion to absorb a 30% freight cost spike.
The expensive brand name drugs will be fine. The ones regular people depend on won't be.
270
daviss2Mar 28, 2026
+65
Yeah exactly, I'm a heart patient and need 7.5mg aspirin and the past 2 months my p******* hasn't had any to buy and any they do get is instantly allocated to waiting prescriptions. I had to buy some online yesterday £7 for a box of 56.
65
zzazzzzMar 28, 2026
+42
i mean if you can get it online for that c**** thats lucky at leasr. lets hope it doesnt get to where online is sold out.
42
ADHDBDSwitchMar 28, 2026
+12
Yeah I'm dreading a shortage of ADHD meds again. Can't exactly get restricted stimulants from the online shops easily.
12
stumblinbearMar 29, 2026
+8
Same. I'd probably just end up losing my job. I am completely non-functional in every capacity without them
8
invisible-bugMar 29, 2026
+3
I have to track everything I do during the day at work and it would all fall apart in an instant
3
Recom_QuaritchMar 29, 2026
+3
I got on the waiting list when it was 4 years........... I can't imagine what another shortage would do to me. I'm already diagnosed but not NHS recognised so I know I have it bad and yet I'm doomed to wait. Sometimes this makes me wanna cry, and this shortage scares me.
And our ADHD is nothing to someone in need of an MRI....
3
beadzyMar 28, 2026
+3
i always wait for a buy-one get-one promo or a coupon for 40% off and buy the biggest bottle. that’s here in the US. i think ireland is known for its generic drug industry for whatever that’s worth to you
3
Separate_Rise_8932Mar 28, 2026
+14
I think this is just an issue with your p******* in particular. I can go to any regular store around me and get Aspirin, for way less than £7.
14
daviss2Mar 28, 2026
+5
She specifically told me it's at the national wholesale level. And okay, i can also buy 300mg's at the p******* but I need 75's.
5
Separate_Rise_8932Mar 28, 2026
+7
Yes i bought those very recently.. from morrisons and from savers. A quick Google search will show they're available in multiple stores.
7
FroggerellaMar 28, 2026
+1
Is there not a way you can get it on prescription yourself? I used to have aspirin on prescription during a previous pregnancy due to pre eclampsia risk.
Not that even having it on prescription can help when there's shortages of the medication - it's a really worrying situation, I'm sorry.
1
daviss2Mar 28, 2026
+1
It is on a monthly prescription with the rest of my meds but you have to have an active repeat prescription at the p******* at the same time they get stock in to get stock allocated so it's still pot luck.
1
G0ld3nGr1ff1nMar 28, 2026
+1
Turns out relying on generic might not be so good...
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2019/05/12/722216512/bottle-of-lies-exposes-the-dark-side-of-the-generic-drug-boom
1
SkewedZenith7Mar 28, 2026
+398
It's okay, because Trump himself and his friends will make a lot of money
398
Martyriot15Mar 28, 2026
+59
Them yachts ain’t gonna afford themselves.
59
SkewedZenith7Mar 28, 2026
+18
Scalps have to be scalped
18
Reluctant_FirestormMar 28, 2026
+3
Insider trades have to be traded.
3
Watcher0363Mar 28, 2026
+2
The Gotta Yacht Club and Christopher Cross approves of this post.
2
potato_analystMar 29, 2026
+2
What's some dead people in UK... They fought so hard to break away from the UK. They would say...
2
SkewedZenith7Mar 29, 2026
+1
They don't care about Americans dying.. the only thing that matters is hoarding money
1
potato_analystMar 29, 2026
+1
Yeah I know that. I am talking about that they also dgaf about UK people.
1
msr42dayMar 28, 2026
+106
Disturbed, not disrupted...if you are on a life-sustaining medication and the supply is insufficient or sporadic, then life is disrupted. When an industry specialist describes emerging challenges, they often seem to divorce themselves from the human end-user for whom this challenge becomes a crisis. When US president47 can control himself or the US nation decides to restrain him and hold him accountable, the whole world will benefit.
106
Additional-Tax-5562Mar 28, 2026
+28
the people of america are trying, protesting in various forms, voting, trying to make change calling representatives; if it's that easy we would've had it done by now. there's literally a form of militia in the streets killing civilians and arresting based on racial profiling and they're now in the airports. along with the financial and supply issues spreading to america causing us to be strapped for any cash, mentally and physically exhausted from just existing. if it's so easy yall can come do something. literally tired of the outside preaching like america is just dormantly laying down for T, you do know he's getting rid of anyone who openly opposes or dislikes him.
28
beadzyMar 28, 2026
+7
yes short of radical violence, this is all we can do. we have to change those in power for things to change. not sure but it seems like work thinks we’re complicit for not moving to behead those in government. it’s like saying “you know how you win against the bad guys? become bad guys!”
7
shinjikun10Mar 28, 2026
+12
That's wishful thinking. 1/3rd of the country heard "immigrants are eating cats" and signed him up. They're completely entrenched. In 3 years or 7 years or whenever, it will happen again and we'll get someone who ramps it up even more. I'm really glad there are people who still hold out hope, but I'm not convinced. Just look at Bush 1, Bush 2, and this.
12
beadzyMar 28, 2026
+3
are you joking? you’re giving 77M (if that) all the power
jfc if people focused more on the 200m that didn’t vote for trump (includes non voters) everyone would be better off.
these comments feel more like encouraging complicity or giving up in advance. you can give up but stop trying to convince people they should too
3
msr42dayMar 28, 2026
+1
Without some hope that US residents care about their community (family, closest friends, work associates, mpg 'bros' and other affinity groups), this semi-functional.democracy with a highly finicially-dependent/governed socity/culture will disintegrate into disconnected regionally based nation states. It's not gotten that bad yet. But there is very real strains.
1
sealconMar 28, 2026
+60
There isn't much the UK isn't dangerously vulnerable to these days. We've spent the past three decades cutting back our ability to make pretty much anything for ourselves.
Another example just from this week is that due to us having the world's highest industrial energy costs, for the first time in our nation's history we are now facing becoming a net importer of salt, the world's most important mineral.
This is happening to pretty much every physical thing we need. We can't just blame Trump, the people who have run this country for the past 30 years need to answer for this.
60
Gamer0607Mar 28, 2026
+88
And people voted for him.
Twice.
88
ScrufflMar 28, 2026
+38
The first time was a shameful embarrassment. The second is an indictment.
38
fuzzy_dice_99Mar 28, 2026
+12
Some three times
12
pinewind108Mar 28, 2026
+5
Hence my theory about pod people slowly taking over. /s... well, mostly.
5
stdstaplesMar 28, 2026
+10
But hey, the orange fucktwat and co make a lot of money
10
MPD1987Mar 28, 2026
+9
As a diabetic on metformin, this scares me so bad
9
Wanna_make_cashMar 28, 2026
+46
Maybe we should have diversified oil pathways and shipping methodology decades ago instead of deciding that it's perfectly A-OK for a majority of the world's oil to be required to pass through a small body of water in a very unstable region of the world.
The fact that one country can hold most of the world's oil hostage is just ridiculous.
46
eucalyptusmacrocarpaMar 28, 2026
+35
It's not most of the world's oil. It's about 20% of the world's oil.
The problem is that there a bunch of countries that get most of their fuel from that 20%. So they are disproportionately affected
35
CheatedOnOnceMar 28, 2026
+7
Or maybe just don’t go to war
7
tlst9999Mar 28, 2026
+10
Building a land pipeline or railway in a very unstable region of the world is also a risky proposition.
It's a giant sitting target for missiles when war does happen, and it's still the same result once missiles start hitting that pipeline.
The Druzhba pipeline itself has been regularly attacked during the Ukraine war and can't operate anyway.
10
catpawsplsMar 29, 2026
+2
This also goes to show the importance of investing in renewable energy sources
2
Imaginary-Ad-7919Mar 28, 2026
+13
The UK has had supply chain issues since COVID, so another disruption like this could hit them faster than most countries.
13
_PM_ME_PANGOLINS_Mar 28, 2026
+2
It was Brexit, not COVID.
2
SacredficeMar 28, 2026
+13
How about eggs? Sure will it's turn again soon.
13
Formal-Try-2779Mar 28, 2026
+7
This is what happens when countries are taken over by Ethno nationalist extremists.
7
WolvesinthestreetMar 28, 2026
+3
Will this also affect EU?
3
ShiroliciousMar 28, 2026
+21
Would be great if Globalization would be back on everyones agenda. There is less likely to be conflict if everyone has to depend on eachother.
This current trend of protectionism is fuelling more conflict. Though lets be honest its mostly the US who is doing it.
21
beadzyMar 28, 2026
+3
hmm just in time to push trump RX i bet
3
bussymonkeMar 28, 2026
+4
how convenient for depopulation
4
MidnightChimpMar 28, 2026
+13
Nothing drastic will happen. We saw happened during covid, rich countries outbid the poorer ones and it will happen again. It will be just a bit more expensive for the consumer. The real suffering will happen in the poorer countries
13
thpkht524Mar 28, 2026
+20
Tf you mean lol? The shortage has already happened: https://mediwatch.co.uk/guides/medicine-shortage-uk-complete-list
20
rclonecopymoveMar 28, 2026
+4
This. There's not going to be a fuel shortage in the West bit it will be a lot more expensive. And the precursor materials for APIs will impact drug production in South Asia, helium will make medical imagery and semiconductor production more expensive and the higher cost of urea will drive food prices up. It's going to be an absolute ball ache but it's not like we're going to run out of aspirin tomorrow.
4
CouldBeLessDepressedMar 28, 2026
+6
"There's not going to be a fuel shortage in the West"
I don't know why people keep saying this because it's just not true. It might not happen as quickly, but oh my yes it is going to happen. The west does not have the refining capacity to be self sufficient. Never has, never will. It can have all the oil in the world, and it wouldn't matter because it can't refine enough of it. The west and in particular the USA is walking straight towards mass starvation and food riots. There were fuel shortages in the 70's when less of the fuel was affected during those gulf conflicts and there was less overall demand. But the situation now is several times worse because there is even less available now with even less potentially available week after week, or conversely there are several times more oil production and capacity that has been lost. And, the demand is several fold higher. So, it doesn't matter where the oil supply chain has or has not been impacted, because it doesn't work in piecemeal. It's all 1 singular supply because of how the markets have formed. If you pinch off any part of it, the whole is impacted. No one is set up to handle all of their own needs, and everyone has been completely reliant on this world-wide system. I could go into why that's the case but the Tl;dr of it is OPEC makes investing in your own local oil industry impossible because no investor is going to drop billions of dollars to build all that extraction and refining capacity just to be undercut by OPEC.
6
ZeeMastermindMar 28, 2026
+2
So, this year is the year to start a vegetable garden
2
34710x2Mar 28, 2026
+2
Will Trump continue to drag this out to force other countries to join in?
2
Maus666Mar 28, 2026
+3
It's not actually up to him at this point. They're in too far for him to be able to give into his instincts and TACO.
3
34710x2Mar 28, 2026
+7
That’s more than likely true. Can’t wait for dump to declare victory for a 15th time and continue to gaslight his base
7
formallyhumanMar 28, 2026
+2
Better not run out of Nurofen Plus.
2
Wants-NotNeedsMar 29, 2026
+2
Sounds like the U.S. may be sucking everyone into another world war.
2
InevitableTension699Mar 28, 2026
+6
Maybe the UK leaders can stand up to trump instead of helping him drag this out for years?
6
Worldly_Anybody_9219Mar 28, 2026
+4
With allies like these (the US), who needs enemies?
4
AnAncientOneMar 28, 2026
+4
The good old Brexit multiplier.
4
Overall_Curve6725Mar 28, 2026
+2
Why is it taking so long for the world to turn on the Trump. He doesn’t hold all cards
2
OverthinkingWineauxMar 29, 2026
+1
The size and strength of the military
1
nogardiratMar 28, 2026
+1
Great time to stock up on aspirin before prices skyrocket
1
american_cheesehoundMar 28, 2026
+1
And if we could all steer clear of blocking the Suez Canal again, that'd be great.
1
Compl3t3AndUtterFailMar 29, 2026
+1
This is what absolutely terrifies me. I need to start a medication that I'll take for the rest of my life and I can not ever stop it or my condition will deteriorate. I'm terrified to start it.
154 Comments