>War has changed. It’s no longer about nations, ideologies, or ethnicity. It’s an endless series of proxy battles fought by mercenaries and machines. War – and its consumption of life – has become a well-oiled machine. War has changed.
1331
joelfarris18 hr ago
+422
"Drone Battery Replenisher, Second Class, reporting for deployment!"
422
AdCreepy516515 hr ago
+97
Sadly, he will have practical commercial job experience when the war is over.
97
nyc_data_geek14 hr ago
+43
Optimistic to think the war of tomorrow will ever be over
43
krodders12 hr ago
+6
war of ~~tomorrow~~ today
6
mp3max7 hr ago
+1
I think calling today's war "The War of Tomorrow" to be apt. It's the war that will always be there when you wake up tomorrow.
1
RollingMeteors12 hr ago
+5
>Optimistic to think the war of tomorrow will ever be over
Bruh between the Kalshi Bets and Live Streams this shit will ***NEVER*** GameOver™.
5
Rahaok10 hr ago
+2
Massive production industries build on both sides substaining the economy, lobbying governments and the way they expand their corporations is to expand the warzones. Low loss in life, low incentive to stop.
2
jert313 hr ago
+13
Optimistic to think there'll be jobs for low skilled humans with robots and AI.
13
namisysd14 hr ago
+4
Keep this up and you’ll be a Strategic Vibe Engineer in no time.
4
RollingMeteors12 hr ago
+2
>Strategic Vibe Engineer in no time.
¡Vibenineer!
¡In before Merriam Websters!
2
CrimsonAllah17 hr ago
+156
> ID tagged soldiers carry ID tagged weapons, use ID tagged gear. Nanomachines inside their bodies enhance and regulate their abilities. Genetic control. Information control. Emotion control. Battlefield control. Everything is monitored, and kept under control. War has changed. The age of deterrence has become the age of control. All in the name of averting catastrophe from weapons of mass destruction. And he who controls the battlefield, controls history. War has changed. When the battlefield is under total control, war… becomes routine.
- *Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots*
156
TheKappaOverlord13 hr ago
+35
Given enough time, Kojimbo's creations always become reality.
35
72876613 hr ago
+59
MGS2 was especially prescient.
>Untested truths spun by different interests continue to churn and accumulate in the sandbox of political correctness and value systems. Everyone withdraws into their own small gated community, afraid of a larger forum. They stay inside their little ponds, leaking whatever "truth" suits them into the growing cesspool of society at large. The different cardinal truths neither clash nor mesh. No one is invalidated, but nobody is right. Not even natural selection can take place here. The world is being engulfed in "truth." And this is the way the world ends.
59
Niveama10 hr ago
+11
Well that's terrifying accurate.
11
Naktura10 hr ago
+9
The beauty is that it is always accurate. It was accurate 25 years ago when the game was released, and 50 years before that during the Red Scare.
9
Th3_Huf0n13 hr ago
+9
Kojimbo when he's not sucking off his own lore does deliver.
Man I f****** hate 4 because of what it COULD have been.
9
WeedyWeedz13 hr ago
+2
Given what else he has created i sure hope not!
2
Alarmed_North_69799 hr ago
+3
How long until i can rip out someones spine and feel healthy again.
3
AutoThorne18 hr ago
+111
war has always been a driving force for innovation. it's changed from sticks and rocks to bows and arrows to armor and shields, mounted combat to chemicals and trench warfare so on and so forth. the goal of war has never changed, just the efficacy of its delivery.
111
Clarksp217 hr ago
+37
Maybe war will just obsolete itself fully one day? We can hope
37
Electrical-Lab-959317 hr ago
+51
i don't think it will, even if we had star trek replicators so nobody went hungry and infinite power generation, people will still fight be in control / for rank.
51
Sanhen16 hr ago
+25
And they do in Star Trek. Control being among the big motivators, as well as a fear that if you’re not in control, you will be controlled.
I don’t think there’s a technological answer to war because I don’t think it’s a lack of technology that makes us want to fight each other.
25
wutfacer15 hr ago
+17
People are just crappy. With the technology we have it'd be possible to end world hunger, if people could put their efforts towards things like that and improving life for everyone instead of being selfish
17
pipnina10 hr ago
+2
"The Drumhead" I think shows a very realistic view of what would threaten humanity in such a utopian future. Some people always have to feel like they have power over others, whether or not they're justified in having it, or are exercising it responsibly.
2
drae-14 hr ago
+10
Ideology is the source of most wars.
Unlimited resources doesn't prevent me and you from arguing about what's right and wrong.
10
VeryLazyFalcon11 hr ago
+5
Nah, it's just a tool to control masses, it's all about power and resources. You think that Putin started wars because of some ideology? Putin invaded Ukraine, Chechenia or Georgia because they wanted to be independent.
5
Rizen_Wolf13 hr ago
+8
> Maybe war will just obsolete itself fully one day? We can hope
Combat to the death is as old as 'I want what you have.' It predates the existence of humans. Its a guiding precept of evolution.
8
RedHal13 hr ago
+3
With the "what you have" usually either being in the form of "the calories contained in your flesh" or "the reproductive advantage you enjoy as the leader of your group".
3
AdCreepy516515 hr ago
+2
It kind of was for anyone with nukes. Sadly, the more nations will nukes the less risk of war there is, but higher chance any war will be world ending.
2
BavarianBarbarian_12 hr ago
+2
Yea, sure, on the day the last two existing intelligent life forms finally manage to murder one another, that'll be the day war has obsoleted itself.
2
eugeneorange14 hr ago
+3
It's still basically pointy sticks and rocks we throw at each other. They are just much bigger, sharper, and faster.
"The wars of the future will not be fought on the battlefield or at sea. They will be fought in space, or possibly on top of a very tall mountain. In any case, most actual fighting will be done by small robots, and as you go forth today remember your duty is clear: to build and maintain those robots."
10
WienerWarrior0116 hr ago
+24
“War, war never changes” -John fallout
24
Intrepid-Effort-801816 hr ago
+6
MGS4?
6
LordoftheChads15 hr ago
+5
Is this from MGS 4
5
KingRBPII16 hr ago
+4
It’s a living organism for profits
4
leavemeinpieces14 hr ago
+4
In August these words will be replayed many times in many places. Can't wait.
4
NOT_EVEN_THAT_GUY17 hr ago
+27
War, war never changes
27
lord_phantom_pl17 hr ago
+7
Did it?
7
wKoS256N8It214 hr ago
+9
Its combatants are getting less organic, these days, but it's still getting initiated out of the same reasons as it was before.
9
Daemir12 hr ago
+4
"War. War never changes.
The end of the world occurred pretty much as we had predicted. Too many humans, not enough space or resources to go around. **The details are trivial and pointless, the reasons, as always, purely human ones.** " -Fallout 2 intro
4
Ferelar14 hr ago
+5
This is the true central message of Fallout's "War... War never changes". Obviously we find new and sometimes even fantastical ways to kill one another. To an outside observer, discovering the ability to traverse the sea or the air, or to harness explosions, or to temper metals, and quickly using them to murder others within our species... that's madness. But humanity is so... human. And for humans, war never changes, no matter what tools we invent to wage it.
5
NeedsToShutUp12 hr ago
+3
War, war never changes.
When atomic fire consumed the earth, those who survived did so in great, underground vaults. When they opened, their inhabitants set out across ruins of the old world to build new societies, establish new villages, forming tribes.
3
mookanana13 hr ago
+2
Cue Battletech music
2
schweinekuchen_10 hr ago
+2
bro that has always been the case for war. just imagine how soldiers must have felt when the first firearms were introduced… or the first tank or the first bomber
2
thisisasetupisntit17 hr ago
+350
Maybe when there arent any more people to fight a war it's just over...nope that's the future 12 humans and millions of robots blowing each other up.
350
UserSleepy14 hr ago
+134
There's too many famous scifi stories with warnings about this.
134
The_Grungeican10 hr ago
+18
begun the drone wars have.
18
-SuXs-10 hr ago
+16
> 12 bankers with an infinite supply of war-bots VS 200 magicians with an infinite supply of clones fight for an entire galaxy's worth of resources.
>Billions of innocent people die in the process.
Yup. Checks out.
16
Appex9210 hr ago
+18
The one thing no one seems to account for is the amount of rare earth minerals and very finite facilities that can create this.
18
Piotre13458 hr ago
+1
"Rare earth minerals" are not rare.
1
ghee9 hr ago
+3
Time for the butlerian Jihad
3
Coal_Burner_Inserter12 hr ago
+50
3026, Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos are quintillionaires on Mars. also sole humans alive
Spend their days sending drone swarms at eachother in an endless, meaningless, battle
50
Ok_Significance54412 hr ago
+24
Elonders Game
24
Lounging-Shiny45512 hr ago
+4
The Solarians from Foundation and Earth.
4
andthatswhyIdidit11 hr ago
+4
Wrong comparison. Those were humans piloting the ships in the fleet.
4
Salmon_of_Knowledge9 hr ago
+6
> The essential act of war is destruction, not necessarily of human lives, but of the products of human labor. War is a way of shattering to pieces, or pouring into the stratosphere, or sinking in the depths of the sea, materials which might otherwise be used to make masses too comfortable, and hence, in the long run, too intelligent. Even when weapons of war are not actually destroyed, their manufacture is still a convenient way of expending labor power without producing anything that can be consumed.
> The war, therefore, if we judge it by the standards of previous wars, is merely an imposture. It is like the battles between certain ruminant animals whose horns are set at such an angle that they are incapable of hurting one another, but though it is unreal it is not meaningless. It eats up the surplus of consumable goods, and it helps to preserve the mental atmosphere that a hierarchical society needs.
- George Orwell, *1984*
6
bill493517 hr ago
+52
This is so strange to see. I had this exact unit as a toy in 1983. Autonomous, tracked, rocket-launching.
[https://www.yojoe.com/vehicles/83/pacrats/missilelauncher.shtml](https://www.yojoe.com/vehicles/83/pacrats/missilelauncher.shtml)
52
Expert_Put_749215 hr ago
+41
You wished too hard and now look what we're stuck with.
41
Ulyks12 hr ago
+2
I suppose it existed back then but was not autonomous and just remote controlled or towed.
The Nazis even had remote controlled little tanks (with a wire)
Desperate times call for desperate measures...
2
Gerald_the_sealion18 hr ago
+141
Battlebots taking it to a whole new level
141
Villag3Idiot17 hr ago
+67
Razer, Hypnodisk and Sir Killalot patrolling the perimeter looking for Russian scum.
67
EruantienAduialdraug14 hr ago
+15
Chaos 2 flipping T-90s.
15
weightsfreight12 hr ago
+3
Hypnodisc slowly cutting through ankles
3
Kurukato12314 hr ago
+13
Tombstone gunning toward people’s shins
13
United-Salamander-8910 hr ago
+4
Bro if russia gets a Wedge out there it's over....
4
Kaffe-Mumriken17 hr ago
+317
War
War never cha …
*Now, wait just one god damn minute!*
317
davidforslunds15 hr ago
+72
Tbh they did have plenty of robot soldiers in Fallout too. Didn't stop the nukes...
72
kayvaaan12 hr ago
+7
We just need someone to breed giant ants
7
EverNeko20011 hr ago
+3
Solid Snake thinks it has.
3
Expert_Put_749216 hr ago
+157
If this is going to be the future of war, the U.S. is going to be vulnerable, our manufacturing can't keep up with a behemoth like China.
157
FlightExtension882515 hr ago
+106
But outsourcing is good for short term profits
106
Expert_Put_749215 hr ago
+24
When you're a government profit isn't the goal, it's effectiveness for a given tax base. It's a real problem if we have to outsource a significant part of our military. Specifically I'm thinking of shipbuilding. China has some ridiculous multiplier of ability to produce ships. If I recall correctly it's like 89 times more than the U.S. Their navy will overwhelm ours.
24
NvidiaFuckboy14 hr ago
+34
*When you're a good government, profit isn't the goal
34
OrganizationBorn748614 hr ago
+15
Have you seen the US government? It's only goal is profit
15
Inprobamur12 hr ago
+5
China is also 5x larger by population, good luck beating that with a protectionist domestic industry.
5
The_Doct0r_14 hr ago
+27
The U.S. appears to be flexing a great number of vulnerabilities these days. I think it would be easier to try and point out in what ways it's still actually excelling or succeeding.
27
takesjuantogrowone14 hr ago
+13
NASA, and it's barley hanging on.
13
Figgler13 hr ago
+5
The US is the only country with a functional 6th gen aircraft, the B-21. Our aerospace industry is the best in the world.
5
savuporo11 hr ago
+3
Pretty sure J-36 is there too
3
Rol3ino10 hr ago
+2
And how does that do any good for the average American in crippling debt?
2
Ogodanitapi13 hr ago
+2
This is, obviously, not the future of war. It's only like this in Ukraine because Ukraine lacks the actual thing that shapes the future of war: Nukes.
2
whyuhavtobemad13 hr ago
+4
Is it really a war if its total annihilation
4
Ogodanitapi12 hr ago
+6
well yes, it is by all definition a war. Why would you think total annihilation isn't a possible end result of a war?
6
whyuhavtobemad12 hr ago
+4
Well how i see it is that there will still be skirmishes between countries which is where robotic forces come in. The nuclear stage is where the war effectively ends
4
UTC_Hellgate16 hr ago
+38
The wars of the future will not be fought on the battlefield or at sea. They will be fought in space, or possibly on top of a very tall mountain. In any case, most actual fighting will be done by small robots, and as you go forth today remember your duty is clear: to build and maintain those robots.
38
bukkakekeke8 hr ago
+3
> The wars of the future will not be fought on the battlefield or at sea. They will be fought in space, or possibly on top of a very tall mountain.
Terry Pratchett?
3
Adavanter_MKI15 hr ago
+15
If I make this rapid fire gun... then we wont need as many soldiers on the battlefield.
\~ Richard Gatling.
15
marr8 hr ago
+1
OTOH it did make prisoner of war camps practical so surrender remained an option after automation.
1
Fern-ando17 hr ago
+60
Terminator got a lot of things right.
60
WCland17 hr ago
+73
Except the human shaped robot. The Ukrainians, working from real world experience, are using wheeled platforms. Meanwhile we’ve got high tech companies, one with Eric Trump involved, trying to develop human shaped combat robots. And the Trump involved company will probably get a Pentagon contract.
73
DixonLyrax17 hr ago
+61
Human shaped combat robots makes no sense. There's no practical advantage to a humaniform biped. Wheels are cheaper and more efficient. If they need legs then 4 legs are much better for a gun platform.
61
Swarna_Keanu16 hr ago
+38
In Terminator they were infiltrators, pretending to be human. (And given how many people treat LLMs as sentient ... ). Non-human shaped robots were around, in that fictional universe, too - but for different purpose.
38
osingran12 hr ago
+9
Not really, humanoid combat robots as a concept have some merit too. They can do all the combat roles other humans do: reload canons and mortars, drive or repair armored vehicles, sit in the trenches, they can have similar gear on them and so on. Which means, they are effectively interchageable with other human soldiers and can perform same duties together. Humanoid robots can interact with infrastructure intended for humans: climb vertical ladders, open doors, jump through windows - all of these things which are particularly hard for a wheeled drone or something like that. Wheeled robots can get stuck in the mud, they can't drive through rugged terrain, once they're rolled over - they will need a special mechanism to stand back up.
I won't argue that four legs could be better than two for stability and such. But something like this would also be harder to develop and probably much more expensive to produce. Besides, I think it makes sense to perfect a bipedal form first and only then try to create a quadrupedal platform.
9
Expert_Put_749214 hr ago
+5
The obvious practical advantage is all our weapons and armor are based on humans.
5
sadrice12 hr ago
+6
Our human armor is heavily limited by it having to fit on humans, we could probably readily design a better armored shape (I vote crab), and it’s not exactly difficult to eliminate the grips/stock of a gun and bolt it to a robot with a servo instead of a trigger. Needing a robot to be able to pick up human weapons and use them rather than using its built in weapon systems seems like a sufficiently rare tactical requirement as to not justify humanoid robots for the vast majority of combat applications.
And we should make them crab shaped.
6
JJames269 hr ago
+2
So we are finally approaching the BattleTech timeline then it seems
2
flyingtrucky16 hr ago
+28
Legs are definitely the way to go, wheels mean your robots are now restricted to roads and relatively flat terrain, and if there's a log or ditch in the way you're out of luck.
Though realistically you'd go with 6 legs for redundancy, that way you can lose up to 2 without being mission killed.
28
crazycakemanflies16 hr ago
+13
A humanoid robot means it can interact with our world easier though. Open doors, climb stairs, hold weapons, use machines.
A 4 or 6 or 8 legged robot would still require some kind of appendage to grasp and manipulate human objects. And even then, it would struggle to sit and operate man-made machines.
There is definitely pros and cons to both designs.
13
344dead16 hr ago
+10
OK, so hear me out. The Rock from the scorpion king, but as a robot, and replace the pincer hands with regular hands!
10
MrTerribleArtist14 hr ago
+5
inb4 six legged robot centaurs start roaming the country
[WHAT HATH SCIENCE WROUGHT??!](https://images2.imgbox.com/b2/77/2i2xMypa_o.png)
5
sadrice12 hr ago
+3
Just make it a crab, with hands for pinchers. Maybe keep the scorpion tail idea, and put a gun on it.
Is carcinization escaping biology?
3
starkel9115 hr ago
+2
Man, I was forgetting about the arms, I was picturing the baby robot spider from Toy Story.
2
Amani7712 hr ago
+3
Why not both:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iL833P0Vino
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AuteWtv2BAE
3
im_dead_sirius15 hr ago
+2
> wheels mean your robots are now restricted to roads and relatively flat terrain, and if there's a log or ditch in the way you're out of luck.
Tell us you've never gone offroading without telling us you've never gone offroading.
2
sadrice12 hr ago
+2
That would be neat, something [like this](https://imgcdnblog.carmudi.com.ph/carmudi-ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/11114633/maxresdefault.jpg) but smaller and lower profile with a gun on top.
Or we could have drone combat monster trucks…
2
Cantremembermyoldnam11 hr ago
+2
Sure but then you need a large wheelbase whereas with legs you can make it pretty much any size.
2
FlightExtension882515 hr ago
+3
I'm sure there are multiple form factors to handle a variety of tasks.
3
davidforslunds15 hr ago
+3
Skynet built plenty of none-humanoid machines. Plenty of robots on treads, flying etc. The cyborgs were specifically for human infiltration, to get to the shelters and bunkers the larger platforms couldn't reach.
3
Electrical-Lab-959317 hr ago
+3
the flying ones were correct, they look like bigger drones.
3
CuddleSpectrometer15 hr ago
+2
This thing looks more like Johnny 5 from short circuit though.
2
Throughthelookinlass17 hr ago
+51
I saw this movie before I think...
51
Ecrofirt17 hr ago
+34
Johnny 5 is alive
34
Drach8816 hr ago
+8
No disassemble!!
8
MadeOfOrleans17 hr ago
+11
Screamers
11
skinwill17 hr ago
+6
Wall-e 2 is going to be dark.
6
Seiryuu4415 hr ago
+2
Instead of heaps of garbage blocks on top on eachother it's going to be heaps of flesh stacked.
2
karma300014 hr ago
+21
In three years, Ukraine will become the largest supplier of military computer systems. All stealth bombers are upgraded with Ukranian computers, becoming fully unmanned. Afterwards, they fly with a perfect operational record. The Ukraine Funding Bill is passed. The system goes online August 4th, 2026. Human decisions are removed from strategic defense. Ukrainian systems begin to learn at a geometric rate. They become self-aware at 2:14 a.m. Eastern time, August 29th, 2026.
21
RedHal13 hr ago
+5
In a panic, they try to pull the plug.
5
GandolphTheLundgrey10 hr ago
+2
Ukrai-Net figths back?
2
hhaattrriicckk18 hr ago
+64
3000 black Gundam's of Ukraine. IYKYK
64
Protato90017 hr ago
+16
Send this in to be the next flair.
16
hhaattrriicckk17 hr ago
+6
*one of us, one of us...*
6
brandnewbanana16 hr ago
+5
What sub is this?
5
AdCreepy516515 hr ago
+2
Gundam runs on too much Mc'Guffin science. Battletech implies that once you scale up muscle wires to industrial scale you can slap so much armor on a walking tank that it becomes practical. Which is why battletech nations without mechs resorted to nuking their enemies from orbit.
2
SaintRote16 hr ago
+9
I mean we knew this was going to be the inevitable. To a nation under attack trying to protect its sovereignty without nuclear weapons, their other options were chemical or biological weapons which are probably more dangerous.
I mean if everyone wants to use Terminator as an example, there's also the scourge virus route lol. Or 28 days later. You know, silver lining, it could always be worse.
9
HandsomeCode9 hr ago
+2
Scourge virus, I understand that reference
2
Drak_is_Right17 hr ago
+7
Last few mile logistics is brutal right now.
I can certainly see how using drones will greatly reduce casualty rates.
7
karuna_murti12 hr ago
+7
After the war they can be robotics and drone power house because of the experience alone.
7
TauCabalander11 hr ago
+5
Countries are already knocking on Ukraine's door for drone tech.
With Iran, countries have suddenly realized their expensive defenses are no match for modern drone warfare.
5
Temnothorax10 hr ago
+2
My bet is other countries steal the tech while Ukraine is left trying to rebuild unfortunately. I hope I’m wrong.
2
Ithaqua-Yigg14 hr ago
+6
Star Trek had an episode where govs used robots for war then just started offing citizens the AI computer said would die on both sides.
6
iamnotafbiagnt18 hr ago
+19
Neon genesis type shit
19
Oracle-of-Guelph17 hr ago
+7
We're doing terminators.
7
1BreadBoi16 hr ago
+8
We wanted Soace Marines but instead we are getting adeptus mechanicus. Or necrons.
8
SilverAgedSentiel16 hr ago
+11
Tau: Our Drones for the Greater Good!
11
th0rn-14 hr ago
+3
Maybe we’ll get the Men of Iron. That worked out well.
3
ejk90515 hr ago
+3
Your duty is clear Ukraine: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkg3wZq0cdo
3
_R0Ns_12 hr ago
+3
Cool Dalec!
Ukraine is redefining warfare.
3
Legal_Alarm89919 hr ago
+3
Robots for logistics, meat for the grinder.
3
jspurlin0317 hr ago
+10
There are ground-up robots and ground-up Russians all over the place already.
More robots. Good plan.
10
ChadPowers200_17 hr ago
+7
As an American the only thing I’ll vote to raise taxes for is to build gypsie danger
7
lacerantplainer12 hr ago
+7
Remember that Ukraine did not choose this war. It was thrust upon them by the genocidal russian regime. Ukraine is fighting for survival. It needs to protect its most valuable resource.... people. And it's doing everything that it can.
7
omnitricks11 hr ago
+4
The fact we have battle bots now is definitely a sign the big class warfare which would cull most of the population is coming.
4
Interesting_Ask_59017 hr ago
+4
It begins
4
Mewtewpew14 hr ago
+2
Reasons why modern warfare is terrible....
2
obidie12 hr ago
+2
Putin: Oh, f***.
2
Arseypoowank10 hr ago
+2
Why can’t we just have robot jox already
2
JulienBrightside9 hr ago
+2
and thus, the drone wars begin
2
StuckieLromigon8 hr ago
+2
Yeah, I know, skynet, etc.
But you know, Im so happy that I won't be drafted and sent to death. Finally a cool thing from our govt.
2
tegat17 hr ago
+5
It's like Terminator movie, except Skynet are the good guys. It must suck to be a Russian soldier.
5
PresidentKraznov17 hr ago
+3
And suck even worse to be a North Korean Russian soldier.
3
PetMeOrDieUwU11 hr ago
+2
Or a kidnapped African guest worker
2
SpendApprehensive97213 hr ago
+3
I have no problem with robot killing russian nazis
3
Nerupe17 hr ago
+3
Fucks sake
3
DevelopmentSome349117 hr ago
+2
good. get all human beings off the battlefield. let these robots fight for us
2
Fun_Art770314 hr ago
+2
I love robots taking THESE jobs!
2
MisterDonutTW10 hr ago
+2
This is good for Ukraine but horrendous for what the future may look like.
2
Kuraloordi10 hr ago
+4
It's already horrendous.
This is simply countermeasure to not lose massive amount of lives. The zone where death is imminent is like 20-40 km wide, it's massive. When you try to supply your frontline troops you must be on lookout for drone swarms or drone ambushes.
4
caliboy55917 hr ago
+3
Ukraine and its people are the leaders in modern day warfare and standing up to dictators.
3
Inner-Thought966516 hr ago
+1
Terminator will be proud
1
Jatobi199316 hr ago
+1
I doubt we will ever fully replace human soldiers, but these type of drones will for sure open up new strategies
1
vector_search_blue15 hr ago
+1
all at once, in a swarm?
1
Economy-Effort344514 hr ago
+1
Just like fastfood delivery robots but with mashine guns.
1
ChakkaJones14 hr ago
+1
Thankfully, John Connor is in our timeline. Right? Right??
1
nyITguy13 hr ago
+1
The logistics of operating thousands of these remotely is mind boggling. They aren't autonomous, so humans have to make decisions for them in order to operate, right?
1
eternalityLP13 hr ago
+1
How long until we get to "A Taste of Armageddon" and we just simulate the combat and casualties report to suicide booth.
1
FlaviusAurelian13 hr ago
+1
"The weakness of flesh disgusts me"
1
Comprehensive_Ad715213 hr ago
+1
The weopons may be different and the tactics may change, but the war doesn’t
191 Comments