Excellent. Unlike cheaper and less capable version of Russian drone, Orion is more expensive, complex and relatively few in number.
Russia currently is supposed to have around 48 such drones and losing four in one swoop is painful loss for therm.
291
matteroffact_sp5 days ago
+11
Can you remember Bayraktars? That song was banging
11
MesMeMe6 days ago
+128
Smoking! :)
128
MillionEyesOfSumuru6 days ago
+50
The FP-2, with a 200 km range and 105 kg warhead, seems like it's making a difference, but it's probably going to get quite a bit better. They've been testing versions with the same range but 158 kg warheads. No way of knowing which were used in this attack, but that's getting into the range where large and fairly well hardened buildings should be nervous. For the non-metric folks in the group, that's a 350 lb bomb flying 124 miles.
50
One-Arachnid-21195 days ago
+20
Sorry, we'll need that in elephants and US football fields.
20
drleondarkholer5 days ago
+9
It's about 0.05 adult elephants in weight (or two newborn elephants) and about 2200 USA football fields. The weight measuring unit is rather inappropriate though, so I would rather measure it to be 1.5DJTs (Donald J Trumps).
9
Future_Ad78115 days ago
+4
I think that is based on an unrealistically low weight for a DJT. I don't care what any 'medical documents' that are released say.
4
-Agonarch5 days ago
+3
Whaaat? You're suggesting that the guy might not be 6'3" (yet much shorter than the 6'3" Prince of Wales and the 6'2" Vance and Musk) or more than 224lbs? (and therefore... *gasp*.. a bit of a fatty and not at all superfit?!)
Why, certainly a guy who's been accused of fraud as many times as him (and found guilty of cases of serious illegal fraud dozens of times) wouldn't just *lie* about this stuff?
3
FantasticFunKarma6 days ago
V1 anyone?
0
SecondaryWombat5 days ago
+6
Except with the ability to aim instead of *gestures in general direction of other country*
6
FantasticFunKarma5 days ago
+2
True!
2
spatenfloot6 days ago
+89
awesome news
89
beccadot6 days ago
+58
Still backing you, Ukraine!! Slava Ukraini!!
58
Bunch_of_Shit6 days ago
+32
russia losing tens of thousands of vehicles is unsurprising because its russia; the US loses 1 fighter jet and it’s a political disaster.
32
GraphiteBlue6 days ago
+18
As the saying goes "The death of one man is a tragedy, the death of millions is a statistic".
18
mavigogun5 days ago
+13
The US has lost a lot more than just one jet- aside from all the other aircraft, half a billion dollar advanced observations equipment, and people, we've lost our democracy.
13
himswim285 days ago
+7
> we've lost our democracy
Don't give up, it is in jeopardy, but we can still save it!
7
mavigogun5 days ago
+1
Something new? Maybe- but the order that got us here is a dead end.
1
Skykeep6 days ago
-8
Also USA is up against Iran, while Russia is up against more modern technology and armaments within Ukraine. A loss to one is not like a loss to the other.
-8
MaxedMinute5 days ago
+17
What are you even talking about? Iran has modern Chinese and Russian air defense systems. I'm not at all in favor of either war, but you're litterally just making shit up.
17
Possible_End_52725 days ago
+5
The dude thinks because they are middle eastern, they are not high tech. Iran has been playing a far smarter game than Russia. This guy is just a dumbass.
5
cattibri5 days ago
+2
iran might be the only near peer adversary in missile tech the us could have gone up against
2
SecondaryWombat5 days ago
+3
This is racism disguised as a military discussion.
Russia has been getting technological support from Iran for its invasion of Ukraine for a while now.
3
Lintson6 days ago
+64
My F1 brain can't unread Free Practice 2 drones
64
vonGlick6 days ago
+24
It is a free practice, real GP will be in Moscow. Hopefully soon.
24
Rosieu6 days ago
+12
Poor Lambiase, what did the poor bloke do to deserve to be banned to Moscow by Red Bull
12
Nameis-RobertPaulson6 days ago
+3
Papa Verstappen is getting him sent to the gulag.
3
TheFlyingBoxcar6 days ago
+19
Believe it or not, penalty for Ocon
19
Lintson6 days ago
+2
He's not a pay driver though
Who was the last French pay driver anyway?
2
t12lucker6 days ago
+2
Charles Pic maybe?
2
positiveexperience5 days ago
+2
Russia GP.
Practice & quali. in Crimea.
Race in Moscow.
2
epi_glowworm6 days ago
+1
Even there contact and destruction has happened. Senna blew up Prost is the incident I can think of
1
Marc-Muller6 days ago
+5
Big Bada Boom!
5
LeedsFan24426 days ago
+12
How are these FPV drones not jammed? How do they get so far into Russia without being not noticed?
12
No_Zookeepergame_276 days ago
+47
Did you not read the headline? It’s in Crimea.
47
LeedsFan24426 days ago
+7
Oh right but still they have attacked deep into Russia before
7
CassowaryVsMan6 days ago
+16
Operation Spiderweb used local Russian cellular networks for command and control. Difficult to jam without degrading cellular service across a wide area.
16
Lazy-Plankton52706 days ago
+9
That was the most Hollywood operation ever
If they put that in COD Ukraine people would say it's unrealistic
9
Detector1506 days ago
+3
I’m sorry I’m stupid, how does it being Crimea prevent the jamming?
3
rdc126 days ago
+5
He is saying that Crimea isn't in Russia, which is unrelated to jamming.
5
britaliope5 days ago
+2
It's more the fact that crimea isn't very deep in the territory controlled by russia
2
Marco_lini6 days ago
+15
Either they have several relay drones where the signal isn’t jammed. The drones are actually being piloted and navigated by video and they have AI guidance that can target autonomously without a signal for the last mile where jamming is the stringest.
15
LeedsFan24426 days ago
+5
It looked like it was manually piloted to me on the video
5
FrostyImplement95656 days ago
+8
My *assumption* based off of pure opinion would be that they're too local to be jammed effectively without jamming themselves.
8
StudyVisible2755 days ago
+5
Ukraine has been systematically degrading Russia’s air defense and electronic warfare capabilities.
5
erikwarm5 days ago
+2
So many different options for both control and remote guidance are possible.
There are systems that use sensitive cameras to look at star constellations for example
2
pjgf6 days ago
-5
I assume these are the fibre optic drones that can’t be jammed, but I’m not really familiar with the different models.
-5
LeedsFan24426 days ago
+8
I don't think they can use fibre optic drones that far away
8
SecureInstruction5386 days ago
+3
The drones could be fiber optic from the launch site but the launch site is remoted into from elsewhere. Like a relay site.
3
SecondaryWombat5 days ago
+1
These drones do not carry a spool of 200km fiber optic.
1
SecureInstruction5385 days ago
No but they might carry 5km of fiber optic cable from the launch site to the target.
From the launch site to the operator it could be a longer distance away as that might be outside interference range and allow for wireless transmission.
0
SecondaryWombat5 days ago
+2
I am pointing out that the drones have a flight range of 200km. The launch site to operator doesn't change the flight distance of the drone, they have a 200km flight range, they are not going to carry that much fiber optic line.
2
mavigogun5 days ago
+2
Excellent news! More, please!
2
Donnahue-George6 days ago
+1
Let’s f*cking go
1
U5K05 days ago
+1
That's an insane video.
Love how every strike drone provides after-action footage of the previous hit.
1
JasonEll5 days ago
+1
I wasn't aware that some Russian drones were called Orion so I was really confused about how Russia was operating the P-3.
1
Legends_never_die96 days ago
-1
So these drones are like Shaheds but bit starlink ?
-1
Major_Aardvark_6445 days ago
-7
I don't like wars dragging lasting so many days who ever have chance close war with one Atom bomb
58 Comments