People are dumb, someone replied to me here the other day saying the tanker crew were pussies and they should just gun it and speed through the strait
16
dwilkes827Apr 10, 2026
+21
Fast and the Furious 14: Hormuz Drift
21
alpha-delta-echoApr 10, 2026
+8
That only works for the MV Leeroy Jenkins.
8
DaveShadowApr 10, 2026
+5
"Captain, they're aiming right at us! At this speed, we're toast!"
"Quick! Increase speed to 30kmph! That will save us!"
5
Von_RalphApr 10, 2026
+37
Tell those dumb yanks to f*** off, every f****** one of them is culpable now, they all sit back and whinge, but do nothing to save their own country.
37
RaverjamesApr 10, 2026
+12
These are the same people who, in a natural disaster, refuse aide because "God" will save them... Then proceed to die...
12
PeaTasty9184Apr 10, 2026
-1
The option at the moment is an armed revolution. We ain’t there yet.
-1
Chainsaw_WookieApr 10, 2026
+10
I’ve got a simpler option, stop mindlessly consuming shit you don’t need and shut down the economy.
10
IncidentalIncidenceApr 10, 2026
-3
damn you figured it out, can't believe that nobody thought of that before
-3
Chainsaw_WookieApr 10, 2026
Well it hasn’t happened yet has it ?
0
IncidentalIncidenceApr 11, 2026
-3
nothing gets by you huh
-3
PeaTasty9184Apr 10, 2026
-6
Yeah..:I don’t need things like food and gas in my vehicle to go to work.
-6
Chainsaw_WookieApr 10, 2026
+6
And you also don’t appear to be able to read.
6
the_moosemanApr 10, 2026
+2
Well they are American.
"Over 50% of U.S. adults read below a 6th-grade level, with roughly 43 million adults (21%) possessing low literacy skills. As of 2023, 28% of adults are at or below Level 1 literacy"
2
DogWithaFALApr 10, 2026
+1
So you’re saying something like a well regulated militia, necessary to the security of a free state would work?
1
PeaTasty9184Apr 10, 2026
+1
That’s the National Guard. They are likely not on the side of the good guys.
1
PlatyPunchApr 10, 2026
+13
Is f****** off and going home an option?
13
IncidentalIncidenceApr 10, 2026
+16
with the strait closed? realistically no.
(which isn't to say that Trump isn't dumb enough that he might just do that anyway)
The GCC, the EU (+UK), and several countries in Asia can't accept Iranian sovereignty over the Strait because for GCC, their entire economies are pretty much based on shipping through the Strait, and for Europe and Asian oil importers, a lot of their oil comes through the Strait. And the GCC countries have a long-term conflict with Iran independent of their economic exposure, so they can't exactly pay Iran billions in tolls a year that will Iran will turn around and use to finance separatist and terrorist groups in all of their neighboring countries as they have been doing for the last 40 years.
16
SweetRoll789Apr 10, 2026
+10
I'm not American but unfortunately due to decisions by Trump this will soon be everybody's problem. What happens if there is not enough supply to keep agriculture, transport, business going?
10
406highlanderApr 10, 2026
+5
It already is everyone's problem. Prices at the pumps are higher than normal, just about everywhere; this morning I saw petrol at £1.60 and diesel at £1.98 *per litre* (3.78 litres in a US gallon, so petrol is £6 per US gallon and diesel is £7.48 per US gallon). I've seen videos from other countries noting a *huge* jump in forecourt pricing.
High prices for fuel puts pressure on haulage companies, leading to higher costs for transport of goods, leading to higher prices at retail for those goods. Plus *much* higher insurance costs for any shipping traffic going through the Strait of Hormuz, plus the toll fee per ship if Iran gets its way on that. And this doesn't even take into account the cost to repair and replace all the oil/gas infrastructure Iran has been destroying. And the fact that pump prices go down slowly after the barrel price drops. Everything is going to cost more money.
While I believe the current Iranian regime needs to go away (and be replaced by a democracy designed and elected by the Iranian people), Trump's ham-fisted meddling has taken things from bad to worse - failing to enable regime change, and emboldening Iran's government to put a stranglehold on one of the most important shipping lanes in the world - and basically *everyone, everywhere* is now worse off for it - except for the rich, who seem to profit in any scenario.
5
msemen_DZApr 10, 2026
+5
It would take an insane amount of money to do this. First, escorting the ships will do nothing. The ships will be prone to artillery, missiles and drones. Those tankers are slow as shit as some commenters said.
Suppose one of the options is to put boots on the ground and take the southern shore of Iran, the strait can still be reached from deep inside Iran anyways. Lastly, you will need a massive amount of interceptors (which they are running low according to reports), and debris falling near and on the strait is a massive hazard for the insurance companies so they might not even want to cover anyone crossing.
You would not be able to realistically open it up with military force. It will need to be diplomatic.
5
NitWhittlerApr 10, 2026
+5
How much money and resources is this wasting?
No one needed "protection" until Trump and Netanyahu started all of this chaos.
5
dbandit1Apr 11, 2026
+3
Trump: "Help us please!"
Starmer: "F*** off"
3
MachineSpirited7085Apr 10, 2026
+3
good luck protecting cargo ships that move slower than a bicycle in someone else front yard lol
3
sroneApr 10, 2026
+2
Any discussions should include trying Trump on war crimes.
2
Relative_Drop3216Apr 10, 2026
-2
Any military presence in the strait is a mere sitting duck with turrets. Iranian drones will have a field day with the US war ships. They don’t even need to be there to do it.
-2
Satyriasis457Apr 10, 2026
-10
Starmer can't even secure british waters from russian vessels lmao
-10
OldLondonApr 10, 2026
+9
Unfortunately the previous gov roundly fucked our armed forces leaving us with f*** all. Unfortunately ships take a while to build, so not really labours fault unless you’d like him to go visit the magic navy tree? Anyway Russia got told to f*** off.
9
yubnubsterApr 10, 2026
+4
Given we literally tracked three of their subs at once with our own and Norways navy, as they moved around our territorial waters, that is obviously wrong.
They were legally permitted to be in those territorial waters, so unless they do something stupid they won't be stopped.
It may be inconvenient, but that's how international law works, assuming you come from a country that recognises it.
4
stickdutraApr 10, 2026
-11
Starmer can't be this stupid
-11
yubnubsterApr 10, 2026
+3
I'm what respect? What has he done?
3
OldLondonApr 10, 2026
At some point someone is going to have to clear this mess up - and it ain’t gonna be the tangoed one
0
stickdutraApr 10, 2026
+3
military option won't work in the strait though
3
Impossible-Bus1Apr 10, 2026
-1
It's has every single time in the past. In fact it's literally been the only solution that's worked.
-1
stickdutraApr 10, 2026
+2
when?
2
zosolmApr 12, 2026
+1
I think he just made it up
1
ImpossibleGoal3010Apr 10, 2026
-4
British PM and ORANGE FINGER talking strategy, better get Bond ,James Bond present to mediate
-4
AnxiouslyPessimisticApr 10, 2026
-7
Starmer stayed strong for all of a few weeks ay
-7
yubnubsterApr 10, 2026
+6
So, what decision involving British involvement and forces makes you think something has changed?
6
AnxiouslyPessimisticApr 10, 2026
-5
One assumes if you discuss options then you are at least now open to taking part
-5
yubnubsterApr 10, 2026
+3
Taking part in what? You seem to know something we don't.
3
AnxiouslyPessimisticApr 10, 2026
-4
“Military options for the strait of Hormuz”. It’s literally the title of the post…
-4
yubnubsterApr 10, 2026
+4
is a discussion equivalent to a commitment to get involved in the current conflict?
4
ImplausibilibuddyApr 10, 2026
+2
You do realise one of those options is "f*** off and sort this mess out yourself" and the UK would need to communicate this in some way, some kind of...talk?
45 Comments