Who were the contracted drivers? Why were they attacked? Why does UNICEF not provide their own neutral drivers? Was it a miss in communication or coordination? The article seems kind of pointless without the relevant facts.
2
jews4beer1 day ago
+11
A press release like this is literally put up as a whatabout to the fact that Hezbollah legit ambushed UNIFIL troops earlier. And Reuters conveniently left out who actually did it in their headline. Quick gotta quote some Hamas representatives.
11
Zontromm1 day ago
+9
standard lack of info for reuters for anything related to israel
9
Haqueward1 day ago
-2
Why even bother asking questions that you wouldn't be interested in the answers anyway? You'll defend this garbage behavior regardless. These are the same people quadruple tapping first responders.
-2
Mission_Scale_86023 hr ago
-3
I asked questions because I was interested in the answers since the information was not provided in the article. No you presume to know my actions before I have made them, are you psychic?
First responders or Hezbollah operatives?
-3
oOoRaoOo16 hr ago
+5
They are water truck drivers contracted by UNICEF. Why bother asking questions when you don't even bother to read the article.
You know you'll have to read the comments too right?
5
Mission_Scale_8609 hr ago
+1
I know they drove for UNICEF but who were they, what’s their background.
1
Haqueward23 hr ago
-7
Predictable gross response. Everything is Hezbollah/Hamas. Worms in the brain. Get help, the world doesn't buy into this Israeli psychosis anymore.
-7
OB1KENOB22 hr ago
+1
[Not everything is as clear as it seems.](https://wck.org/news/gaza-update-8-12/?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=21558764761&gclid=CjwKCAjw14zPBhAuEiwAP3-Eb0CDrGHAvB8PTYmz2tVuBxmsYuiS-v4O-qbVGBLIzo4BDlh2P5LhOxoCghsQAvD_BwE)
1
Nukes-For-Nimbys18 hr ago
-1
UNICEF I'm more inclined to believe, they actually do focus on their mission.
This ain't UNRWA who straight up collaborate with Hamas.
-1
Honest_Type_29931 day ago
-7
Doubt
-7
Hill_Orc_Warrior22 hr ago
-3
It was terrorist water probably
-3
Ultra_Metal18 hr ago
-5
The UN is not a credible source.
-5
Nukes-For-Nimbys18 hr ago
-4
UNICEF are not UNRWA.
The former are an actual aid agency the later are behind the UNs terrible reputation.
-4
Ultra_Metal18 hr ago
+1
Still part of the UN, which means it has no credibility.
1
ShreddedCredits9 hr ago
+1
It is long past time for the United States to not only stop giving this rogue state free weapons, but stop selling it weapons.
16 Comments