· 78 comments · Save ·
For Sale Mar 23, 2026 at 10:26 PM

United Nations rejects U.S. effort to erase trans women: “It stops here”. One advocate accused the U.S. of being “willing to lie” to “push forward their own gender ideology onto people in the U.N. system.”

Posted by southpawFA


https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2026/03/united-nations-rejects-u-s-effort-to-erase-trans-women-it-stops-here/

🚩 Report this post

78 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
southpawFA Mar 23, 2026 +384
>The failed resolution came after the U.S. also failed at the beginning of the conference to introduce amendments to the conference’s agreed conclusions. Those amendments included the redefinition of gender, along with others that align with the current presidential administration’s positions on gender equality, DEI, reproductive rights, climate change, and digital regulation. After CSW delegates voted against the amendments, the U.S. forced a vote on the agreed conclusions, marking the first time in the conference’s 70-year history that the document was not adopted by consensus. The U.S. was the only member state to vote against the agreed conclusions, which represent CSW’s priorities and guidelines on gender equality and justice for the world community. >Speaking to Devex, Jennifer Rauch, global advocacy officer at Fòs Feminista, accused the U.S. of being “willing to lie” to “push forward their own gender ideology onto people in the U.N. system.” >During last Thursday’s final CSW session at the U.N. Headquarters in New York City, the representative from Belgium said that the U.S. resolution was “factually incorrect as it misquotes and contradicts Annex IV of the Fourth World Conference on Women, and attempts to rewrite what was carefully agreed and reflected in Beijing over 30 years ago.” >On behalf of 25 other member states, Belgium called for a “no action motion” to block the proposal. Pakistan and Chile were the only two member states to vote with the U.S. against the motion, with 23 countries voting to block the anti-trans proposal and 17 abstaining. >“It was a huge moment of the world telling the U.S. that it stops here,” María Paula Perdomo of the LGBTQ+ advocacy organization Outright International told Devex. “We follow the rules, and if you want to bring this, do it appropriately, do it with due process, and bring it with truth.” I don't get what Christian nationalists get out of being so cruel and hateful towards trans people. They think they are winning souls to Christ by kicking trans people into the dirt. To me, it's the biggest repellent to Jesus. If being a Christian means being a hateful bigot that spits in the face of trans people and plots to commit genocide against them because "The Bible tells me so!", then I'd rather never be a Christian and join my trans friends in hell for eternity. It sounds better than being where they are.
384
Zeguaros Mar 23, 2026 +200
The thing worth naming is that this was never really about theology. Anti trans Christian nationalism is a [highly funded, strategically coordinated political project](https://www.npr.org/sections/shots-health-news/2024/09/25/nx-s1-5127347/more-trans-teens-attempted-suicide-after-states-passed-anti-trans-laws-a-study-shows). Trans people are a target because they challenge the rigid social hierarchy these movements are wrongly trying to build and protect. The cruelty is entirely their point. Defining an out group to rally against is how you keep the movement cohesive. The human cost of that strategy is measurable, states passing anti trans legislation see suicide attempts among trans youth increase by [72%.](https://www.thetrevorproject.org/research-briefs/state-level-anti-transgender-laws-increase-past-year-suicide-attempts-among-transgender-and-non-binary-young-people-in-the-usa/) The UK is facing the same thing right now and it’s not a coincidence. The Alliance Defending Freedom, a US anti LGBT organisation, has [spent over £410,000 in the UK since 2017](https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/5050/revealed-us-anti-lgbt-hate-group-dramatically-increases-uk-spending/) , with American evangelical groups having spent over [$280 million on European advocacy](https://humanists.uk/2024/04/08/american-christians-spending-millions-to-push-religious-conservatism-in-the-uk/), EXACT same playbook.
200
the_tanooki Mar 23, 2026 +52
Precisely. It's easier to get people to look where you want when you put fear into them. "Christianity" is a means to and end. It was never and will never be about Christ. They found a scapegoat and will use that to get what they truly want: power and money.
52
CatCatchingABird Mar 24, 2026 +1
Pretty much. It's the in-group method of domination and control. Fascists governments do not want people to have autonomy. It starts but does not end at the LGBTQ community.
1
southpawFA Mar 24, 2026 +1
Yup. I've been pointing that out for the longest. I wrote a post about the Alliance Destroying Freedom years ago. They literally were the ghouls that employed Dr. Stephen Levine, who literally defended the Catholic priest sex abuse. [https://tygersongbird.substack.com/p/christian-nationalism-is-cancer-episode?utm\_source=publication-search](https://tygersongbird.substack.com/p/christian-nationalism-is-cancer-episode?utm_source=publication-search)
1
Karma_1969 Mar 24, 2026 +1
This is why I don’t let people like J.K. Rowling or Richard Dawkins off the hook for their exclusionary speech. They aren’t just jerks with bad opinions who are otherwise harmless, their words cause real and measurable harm, and they have blood on their hands.
1
BadahBingBadahBoom Mar 23, 2026 +41
Honestly US evangelical Christianity really stumps me. Like this is a religion that was literally founded on loving everyone whoever they are even if they are different to you, loving and accepting specifically the outcast/persecuted in society, believing everyone is inherently good and how God made them. If it weren't for all the Christian hate layered on top it would be a masterclass in diversity, equity and inclusion.
41
serafinawriter Mar 23, 2026 +1
It's not just American evangelicals, although they are perhaps the noisiest and the ones that dominate media culture. The only two Catholics that I know are also virulently anti-LGBT and especially anti-trans. At the end of the day, no denomination is free from religious bigotry. There are select Christians who do practice "love thy neighbour", but I don't know of any denominations or prominent Christian institutions that prescribe this rule and actively urge its supporters to live by it. I have no problem with personal faith but organized religion is a cancer. Tax the churches, start regulating "Christian schools". I'm an advocate for religious studies in school, but only because it's an opportunity to teach kids from a young age about all the various religions and the cultural / historical impact they've had on human civilization.
1
duncan-the-wonderdog Mar 24, 2026 +1
Episcopalians and Seventh-Day Adventists?
1
serafinawriter Mar 24, 2026 +1
I'm unfamiliar with these ones so I can't say. I did know a Seventh-Day Adventist fanily a long time ago who had to inject Christianity into everything and considered Catholics "Satan worshippers" though lol. Not morally abhorrent perhaps but certainly annoying :) I also thought about Quakers after I wrote the comment. Again I don't know a lot about them but I've heard they are strict pacifists and are generally good people. Honestly, what I always say to my Catholic colleague when he decides to go on about what is or isn't moral in the eyes of God, is that a real Christian has only two commandments, to love God, and love each other. That's Jesus' own words. And neither he nor the vast majority of Christians come anywhere close to that.
1
Pseudonymico Mar 24, 2026 +1
The most famous Seventh-Day adventist I've heard of is the guy who invented corn chips to prevent kids from masturbating (and encouraged circumcision for teenaged boys and applying carbolic acid to teenaged girls' clits, without anaesthetic in both cases, for the same reason).
1
Shoadowolf Mar 24, 2026 +1
Because they cherry pick things in the bible that fits them and ignore everything else. It's just an excuse for their hatred.
1
natnguyen Mar 23, 2026 +77
If there is an afterlife I want to go where all my fellow queers go and never have to deal with this trash ever again.
77
DwarfPaladin84 Mar 23, 2026 +18
I agree with ya 💯
18
ijustwannanap Mar 24, 2026 +1
I would take an eternity of trans infighting over silly shit over what's happening irl now
1
Clerithifa Mar 24, 2026 +1
Gay Heaven seems pretty cool
1
ctothel Mar 23, 2026 +23
Some people think that there is a Way Things Should Be, and that deviation from this Way is Wrong. They will not be able to tell you why these things are Wrong, for two reasons: they don’t understand that harm is necessary for something to be wrong, and they confuse their feelings of discomfort at the unknown for objective reality. They think it’s an adequate basis to judge others on. This is basically a complete definition of a social conservative *voter*. A social conservative politician may or may not conform to this definition, but they will absolutely capitalize on it.
23
blitzkregiel Mar 24, 2026 +1
christianity is just the tool that conservatives are using to try and enforce a top down hierarchy. that’s it. it’s not about religion, it’s only about belief that they are better than others. and they think the system should enforce their version of that vertical hierarchy where, surprise surprise, they’re at or near the top and therefore everyone else has to pay tribute to them. once you see conservative ideology through the lens of the hierarchy everything they do and say finally makes sense, at least from the point of understanding why they do and say such horrible things.
1
LocutusOfBorgia909 Mar 24, 2026 +1
It's interesting that Pakistan voted with the US, both because they are, uh, *not fans* of the US, generally speaking, but also because Pakistan literally has an X gender marker option for their passports and national IDs and has a pretty long history, culturally speaking, with "third-gender"/trans people (*khwaja sira*). Not that trans rights are suddenly ascendant in Pakistan, but the situation there also isn't necessarily what one might assume from the outside.
1
BrilliantPiccolo5220 Mar 24, 2026 +1
As a parent to a trans person I wholeheartedly agree with you. My son is the exact same wonderful person he was before he transitioned, now he is just more himself. Edited for overzealous application of commas.
1
meltdown_popcorn Mar 23, 2026 +8
Amen
8
tjvs2001 Mar 24, 2026 +1
Cruelty is the point, their whole schtick
1
Northern_Ice_2501 Mar 23, 2026 +7
100 upvotes. I always enjoy your take Southpaw.
7
southpawFA Mar 23, 2026 +1
Thank you so much. I appreciate the love. I'm just trying to fight for my friends and family—i.e., our LGBTQIA+ community. They are our family.
1
stillavoidingthejvm Mar 23, 2026 +5
I feel like there's some % of them who are deep in the closet and long to be as free with themselves as out trans people are. This somehow smells like envy.
5
Total-System877 Mar 24, 2026 +1
It's not jus Christian nationalists.ive heard people who I woild never have considered cruel say awful, hateful things about trans people. The effort to "other" them into something less than human is succeeding. 
1
CptHA86 Mar 24, 2026 +1
"Gods don't make mistakes.!" They can't handle that life is more complicated than "either/or" and are reacting violently.
1
Nanasweed Mar 24, 2026 +1
They are the American Taliban.
1
fibonacciii Mar 24, 2026 +1
It’s because of dogma 
1
CharmingAd4640 Mar 24, 2026 +1
"Christian nationalists"? Are you implying that religious fanatics are the only ones with common sense and can't be bothered to be involved in other peoples make believe tales about imaginary genders and transformations? Outside of Reddit and twitter im pretty sure that's most normal peoples opinion on this matter. What does religion have to do with it
1
CouchCorrespondent Mar 23, 2026 +170
Good. More of this, please.
170
Prior_Coyote_4376 Mar 23, 2026 +175
Republicans are clearly pushing radical gender ideology that reduces women to wombs and men to monkeys, and they want to enforce this so badly that they’ve literally proposed genital inspections in schools I’m done pretending Republicans deserve a seat at the table. They’ve thrown away one of the greatest visions of a prosperous democratic nation of immigrants because they couldn’t handle a black man making their lives better They’re radical religious fanatics who literally want to drag us into civil wars over women’s rights and foreign wars over apocalyptic doomsday messages They’re literally insane, and pretending they’re not or downplaying it is almost as insane
175
southpawFA Mar 23, 2026 +72
I refuse to even entertain the thought of talking with Christian nationalists. They literally are plotting the genocide of trans people who have done nothing to them. They find the idea of trans people merely being happy and thriving in life as a spit in the face to their faith. They refuse to just coexist and love everybody. They have decided dead trans people as their sole form of happiness in life. It's despicable.
72
OhhEmmGeeWTF Mar 23, 2026 +16
Their faith is deeply rooted in patriarchy and superiority complex.
16
OhhEmmGeeWTF Mar 23, 2026 +13
Eloquent, precise
13
sorcerersviolet Mar 24, 2026 +1
People who are insane don't know what they're doing, or don't know what they're doing is wrong, and so are legally not responsible for their actions. The Republicans, on the other hand, know exactly what they're doing here. Don't let them off the hook.
1
Lowkey_Danger Mar 23, 2026 -45
I get why you feel that way, but stuff like this usually has way more nuance
-45
JohnnyFire Mar 23, 2026 +43
Nuance is fine. I'm willing to talk nuance. What so much of the GOP is doing regarding trans people is without nuance. It's blunt, it's ideologically rotten, and done with the express consent not to protect women or children or whatever the f*** they want to ascribe it to today but to blanket demonize a miniscule part of the population rather than offer them the most basic of humanity.
43
sleepymeowth052 Mar 24, 2026 +1
Trans Rights are Human Rights
1
Speartree Mar 24, 2026 +1
Indeed they are! I'm kinda proud of my Belgian representatives now. They don't always get it right, but this was a big one.
1
Jorgen_G_Pakieto Mar 23, 2026 +44
The US conservative Christian ideology doesn’t have an ability to stand on its own merits like everyone else’s does which is why they literally have to change the laws of their societal reality in order to make it succeed. These right wing clowns are pathetic, their way of life is unsustainable & we need to be aggressive about making them realise that fact.
44
Historical_Bend_2629 Mar 23, 2026 +67
Human rights. Legislation attempting to erase trans people with the focus on trans-women is misogynistic, but they are happy to erase trans-men, as well.
67
Lynda73 Mar 23, 2026 +8
This administration targets trans women for the cruelest treatment, especially. Like the latest order than trans women are to be put in men’s prisons. No such order for trans men.
8
Fickle_Blueberry2777 Mar 24, 2026 +1
That’s not true at all, what happens is trans men get *erased* and just treated as women, and their experiences in prison is also particularly bad as they often get forced into solitary confinement and are often faced with things like harassment, SA, denial of healthcare, so on and so forth. The erasure of trans men and their experiences looks exactly like this, and claiming they don’t face anything just adds to the erasure and oppression they already face mostly alone and unheard.
1
LocutusOfBorgia909 Mar 24, 2026 +1
There was just a news story a couple of months ago about trans men being specifically targeted for sexual assault and use as slave labor by guards at ICE detention centers (where they were housed with women based on their sex assigned at birth), which had apparently been going on since before Trump took office this second time. Maybe you should take a seat and stop saying gross shit about trans men, whose experiences you clearly don't understand and don't care to understand.
1
MercyPewPew Mar 24, 2026 +1
This is just false. We are equally effected by transphobic administration. Trans men already face greater barriers to transition due to Testosterone being a controlled substance, and we are statistically more likely to face violence than trans women, especially surrounding bathroom bans. Trans women have been made the boogeyman of the anti-trans movement, but that doesn't mean trans men aren't equally effected by the legislation being passed (and that we don't face our own unique systemic issues). Stop with the oppression Olympics
1
Fickle_Blueberry2777 Mar 24, 2026 +1
EXACTLY, not to mention SA rates and other crimes against trans men often get falsely reported as crimes against women, so we don’t really know just how *many* trans masc people face these oppressions because they don’t even get properly represented. The erasure is constant and incredibly loud, it’s beyond disingenuous for people to claim that trans men don’t face the same and worse.
1
MercyPewPew Mar 24, 2026 +1
Add onto this that any legislation limiting female bodies also affects trans men. Being told I have it easy because I'm a man now is just so f****** exhausting and frankly ridiculous
1
Leah-theRed Mar 24, 2026 +1
Yep. I live in a state that has already made laws that protect trans rights (for now) but I still struggle with the way people (mostly online but even some close friends of mine) have minimized or otherwise tried to police the way I talk about myself or my experiences as someone who is transmasc, especially as someone who is nonbinary and not looking for a "full" transition. No, I won't "pass easily." No, I won't get "male privilege." And even if I did manage to at least outwardly turn into the son my dad always wanted, I would still struggle with the way female reproductive decisions are made. I've been fighting for a hysterectomy for both health and gender reasons for a while now and that's in a fairly liberal state.
1
yagirlmimi Mar 24, 2026 +1
The joke is on them though since there’s no real way of erasing trans people, trans people have always existed and sure dysphoria to not be able to present as the gender identity one identifies with is cruel and somewhat of an obstacle but they underestimate a few things. The LGBTQ+ community are creative, resourceful, resilient and have mastered the art of petty. It’s not the first rodeo. Just a few dolls that I know alone could take down the NBA if they wanted, I can only imagine what some have on Republican officials.
1
ParagonFury Mar 24, 2026 +1
> The joke is on them though since there’s no real way of erasing trans people, Fully? No. Functionally? Completely possible, if they manage to turn enough of the population to their will.
1
cwk415 Mar 23, 2026 +27
This makes me sick. The people representing our nation are utterly reprehensible. 
27
PlainBread Mar 24, 2026 +1
Glad to see the world pushing back against chuds instead of attempting the failed policy of appeasement.
1
Lynda73 Mar 23, 2026 +16
Yes, call these people out. Hopefully the rest of the world can speak the truth unlike our lying “elected” officials.
16
mouseywithpower Mar 24, 2026 +1
No quarter for these psychos. The whole world should just reject us entirely until the right wing is demolished and we can rebuild some semblance of trust. Christian nationalism is a f****** disease.
1
JonnyHopkins Mar 24, 2026 +1
It's the fact that they care so much that bothers me. Who cares. Why are you threatened by this. B**** ass pussies.
1
Inevitable_Oven_2908 Mar 23, 2026 +21
This is a crucial step for human rights everywhere.
21
IrrelevantLeprechaun Mar 24, 2026 +1
Unfortunately as great as it is that the UN pushed back, the UN itself has no actual arm of enforcement, and most of their policies and resolutions are just performative suggestions that nobody is actually required to follow. I mean ffs they have some of the world's most regressive countries on their human rights board. And USA is increasingly looking like it's just going to start using its military to terrorize UN members into complying with their regressive ideologies. The US may have failed this time, but I fear that eventually they aren't going to be merely asking soon; they'll be *demanding*, and eventually *imposing* it by force.
1
Baron_Furball Mar 24, 2026 +1
In the defense of the US, not that they need it, but those lies worked pretty well during the War on Drugs.
1
BlahBlahBlackCheap Mar 24, 2026 +1
They were willing to lie about a war, the economy, voting rights...
1
AceofKnaves44 Mar 23, 2026 +3
Trump? Willing to lie? Never!
3
EH_Operator Mar 24, 2026 +1
Please open your programs to accept trans people. They’re not going to stop and they’re already doing batshit illegal and nonsensical medical experimentation on trans people in prisons and detention centers out of sheer hate. And it’s just getting started. We have nowhere to go and most of us are too poor to do anything about it.
1
VirtualGrey Mar 23, 2026 +5
Ok so anyone willing to let us queers in or is it just words as usual?
5
IrrelevantLeprechaun Mar 24, 2026 +1
The UN has no actual way to enforce anything (and it was never meant to), so while this is good news, it ultimately doesn't *mean* anything because the member countries can still end up doing anything they want and the UN can't stop them.
1
in1gom0ntoya Mar 24, 2026 +1
thankyou. the wholesale erasure being committed against ever non white CIS demographic is unacceptable and while preventable domestically it is only being ignored at best and enabled at worst.
1
Outside_Sherbert_357 Mar 24, 2026 +1
Call them out UN and everyone else.
1
Rich_Charity_3160 Mar 24, 2026 +1
The U.S. wasn’t called out exactly — the quotes in the headline aren’t from anyone at the U.N. or its member nations. The motion was blocked from coming up for debate because the existing usage of the term in the Declaration essentially aligns with the U.S. proposal without explicitly stating it in a way the prevents the U.N. from being more inclusive when its appropriate. From the U.N. [1995 Beijing](https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/n96/273/01/pdf/n9627301.pdf)g Conference on Women use of gender: > *The word "gender" had been commonly used and understood in its ordinary, generally accepted usage in numerous other United Nations forums and conferences; there was no indication that any new meaning or connotation of the term, different from accepted prior usage, was intended in the Platform for Action.* > *Accordingly, the contact group reaffirmed that the word "gender" as used in the Platform for Action was intended to be interpreted and understood as it was in ordinary, generally accepted usage.*
1
Arose1316 Mar 24, 2026 +1
Im 35/f/fairly attractive/nice figure. I have lived in the biggest of cities to the smallest of towns and worked in events and hospitality for 15 years - traveled all over the world, student of anthropology before i realized I couldn’t make any money - but did earn a respect for all colors and creeds - so I have a pretty good sample size of humanity, I’d say. I have been catcalled, asked out in the line in the gas station and called a slur when I denied him, cornered leaving the hotel I worked for in Vegas, asked to come home with someone at 7:30 am in the grocery store, feeling someone following me to my car, sucker punched by a guy I cut off at the bar, fired because I denied access to someone important and was young and dumb and thought HR was for the employees (lol), I’ve been raped at a friends party…I could go on for pages. I’ve been the victim of severe mental, physical, emotional, financial abuse that almost ended in my murder multiple times. I’d say I have an uncomfortable interaction once a week. At minimum. I love men. I really do. Nearly to my own demise. But there wasn’t one scenario listed above or in my vast experience of men and abuse - that involved a trans person or a woman other than myself. I can’t believe we’re burning because these loser dudes don’t want to admit they’re gay (okay among many reasons, but yeah)
1
Leah-theRed Mar 24, 2026 +1
Saying that gay and queer oppression is all based on people being closeted is extremely harmful. It's putting the onus of our mistreatment as only being enacted by the "bad" queers. People who are closeted do not do everything their power to harm others that are out, and cisgender and heterosexual people are just as capable of harming and dehumanizing us.
1
Arose1316 Mar 24, 2026 +1
Well. That certainly is quite an inference based on half a sentence. lol Genuine question - where am I saying that “gay and queer oppression is all based on people being closeted?” This was a Reddit comment, not a manifesto on queer oppression. I made a flippant comment intended to be about Lindsey Grahm and Trump enjoying men, not wanting to admit it, so they’re burning the United States to the ground instead of being okay with themselves. That’s it. Love how you ignore my experiences, by the way. Im a bisexual cis woman and victim of abuse that shared their story as an anecdote intended to express that trans folks aren’t the enemy and our leaders are nut jobs. Relax.
1
freereflection Mar 24, 2026 +1
I'm sure all the Muslim majority and Christian African countries are opposed to the US initiative as well. 
1
Savingsofthe5570 Mar 24, 2026 +1
Are they crazy? Gender ideology means thinking the word “trans women” has any meaning at all. Why do they purposely misunderstand?
1
[deleted] Mar 23, 2026 -46
[removed]
-46
AHugeHildaFan Mar 23, 2026 +15
The sheer ignorance of this comment is astounding.
15
UnpopularOpinionAlt Mar 23, 2026 +12
All conservative organizations (and conservatives) are useless
12
Elseiver Mar 23, 2026 +5
Yeah, if they were useful they'd be sending in peacekeeping forces to help against ICE
5
TheAmberAbyss Mar 23, 2026 +7
I agree, the UN as it is now is useless, it needs nuclear weapons and a standing army to invade failed nations like the United States.
7
CGI_OCD Mar 24, 2026 +1
Ok 🤡🤖
1
← Back to Board