This is absolutely not a good thing at all. Even extending deployments from 6 to 9 months is a hardship. This breaks the morale of crew and is terrible on families.
563
sloowhand2 days ago
+46
I know quite a few people who were on that Lincoln deployment. The big difference is that it was involved in a conflict that the crew largely supported. But even then it was really really hard.
46
_the_genius1 day ago
+22
My dad was in over 20 years. Dealt with long deployments, some of them extended. It sucked being a young kid without your dad for months at a time. I feel for every sailor and family member impacted.
22
AdventurousLet5482 days ago
+115
Morale is so low in the military that a lot of folks are leaving as soon as they can. It’s a shit hole without leadership.
115
mriguy2 days ago
+254
I’m not saying Trump is following Putin’s orders to wreck the American military. I’m just saying if he _were_, it would look exactly like what he’s doing.
254
overlordjunka2 days ago
+10
But that CO is gonna get another star
10
the_original_kermit1 day ago
+6
Legitimate question.
How did this become the longest deployment? I get the war with Iran and all, but were they already on a longer than expected deployment already before that started?
6
_the_genius1 day ago
+10
They were deployed down to South America for the Venezuela action and never came back to Norfolk. They steamed across the Atlantic to the Mediterranean to sit and project power.
10
the_original_kermit1 day ago
+2
Thank you
2
KwisatzHaderach941 day ago
+8
trump is practically encouraging a mutiny. doesn't matter if he gave service members a raise.
8
Chrisbap1 day ago
+4
Just wait until he sends them directly from his Iran war to invading Cuba.
4
onceinawhile2222 days ago
+813
What a way to ruin your military. Extend operations long past recommend maintenance parameters. Stress the crew with extended deployments so they don’t see their families. Hard to see what’s the purpose of this since it was all by choice of Trump.
813
captHij2 days ago
+268
All while making them sit on top of a couple nuclear reactors in a war zone while having to continually unclog the poorly designed toilets.
268
tepkel2 days ago
+119
>continually unclog the poorly designed toilets.
They should go old-school and just tack some pieces of plywood with holes cut in them to the side of the ship. They could call it the poop deck.
119
cwx1492 days ago
+39
Just cut holes in some of the wings of the planes and park them so the wing hangs off the side
39
WoodenInternet2 days ago
+11
use an F-35 for maximum toilet opulence
11
tepkel2 days ago
+8
Those fish will never see it coming.
8
Bagellord2 days ago
+9
No no no. Just have helos take off and they can lean out the sides. The wind from the rotor blade will waft the smell away, and if they go into a low hover the ocean spray will act as a bidet. I will not be taking any questions.
9
Xytak2 days ago
+12
As a safety officer, I see zero issues with this.
12
AcousticOnomatopoeia2 days ago
+1
With the poop rope?
Trust me, we don't wanna go back the days of the poop deck poop rope.
1
laptopAccount21 day ago
+1
Poop deck is actually paupe deck, french for aft.
1
tepkel1 day ago
+5
Whereas the word "joke" comes from Latin *iocus*.
5
AntiseptikCN14 hr ago
+1
LOL the number of people on that ship the brown trail would be visible from space!
1
ObjectiveDark402 days ago
+6
Each clog costs $400,000 to unclog
6
FreeUsePolyDaddy2 days ago
+10
$390,000 of that is the single-use toilet plunger specially designed for warfighters (TM pending). Removing the clog itself only costs $10,000.
10
ObjectiveDark402 days ago
+6
But for reals it's an expensive acid flush because a plunger won't get a t-shirt out of a vacuum toilet.
https://apnews.com/article/6df7cd0621a3bc06f4874ccaa02603a7
https://www.npr.org/2026/01/17/nx-s1-5680167/major-plumbing-headache-haunts-13-billion-u-s-carrier-off-the-coast-of-venezuela
6
Queermagedd0n2 days ago
+4
And feeding them what looks like shoe leather, dog food, and a small handful of chopped carrots.
4
WCland2 days ago
+45
Hegseth is an idiot and fantasizes about tough soldiers and sailors that apparently never need to rest. If he actually knew anything about military matters, he’d know the most effective soldiers are well rested and have had rotations off the front lines.
45
Cookie_Eater1081 day ago
+6
Wasn't that a known thing since Roman times?
Troops fight ineffectively when winded. Which is why formations were created that allowed for frontliners to rotate effectively midcombat with rear forces in a safe manner. You can only maintain a shieldwall for so long before your arm gets sore.
6
Hongxiquan2 days ago
+47
If you look at it from a large scale view it looks like a pretty good way to ruin the American military by screwing with morale
47
mixmasterADD2 days ago
+58
They will still vote R
58
DTFlash2 days ago
+28
He thinks they're suckers and losers so why would he care?
28
f1del1us2 days ago
+5
I don’t think it was a choice more a lack of caring in any sense. I imagine he does not see it as people but just a thing to execute his desires, like a hammer so to speak.
5
ffrkAnonymous2 days ago
+15
Cruelty is the purpose.
15
MrFishAndLoaves2 days ago
+6
You give them too much credit. I think they are just out to destroy America.
6
Teantis2 days ago
+5
Shit at this point I think ascribing them any motives or plans that have a time horizon longer than their immediate nasty urges of the moment might be giving them too much credit.
5
aradraugfea2 days ago
+9
I gotta wonder if Trump is trying to get Zero votes so he can claim it was rigged
9
Milli_Rabbit2 days ago
+14
Hes literally the definition of his generation. They're here to exploit us for every drop of blood and every dollar all the way to their dying breath.
14
NrvusRaccoon2 days ago
+7
Lots of military folk voted for Trump so they are getting what they want
7
merrysunshine22 days ago
+3
Wonder if those that did even comprehend that though. I can’t imagine what the FRG group postings look like.
3
Luniticus1 day ago
+1
If only we had 10 other aircraft carriers so we could rotate them through deployment and shore duty while still maintaining a presence in multiple theaters of operation with proper planning.
1
ericmm761 day ago
+1
And look at the meals.
1
nazerall2 days ago
+254
I know some guys in the Navy that are really f****** sick of our military leaders.
254
CantAffordzUsername2 days ago
+196
I had to look it up but a vast majority of our serving men and women voted for him both terms so….the ones you know are the minority
Shocked how stupid the ones are who voted for him twice after all the shit he as said about them
196
cameron42002 days ago
+58
They hate immigrants and gay people more than they hate their jobs unfortunately
58
shwarma_heaven2 days ago
+12
That is basically what it comes down to... Economy? No more wars? Going to jail all pedophiles? Going to wear the debt?
All just window dressing for the real reason they voted for him.
12
[deleted]2 days ago
+31
[deleted]
31
premature_eulogy2 days ago
+49
...but that *is* identity politics.
49
RVAforthewin1 day ago
+2
Veteran here. We received pay raises annually, regardless of who was in office. I served under Dems and Republicans.
2
Kabby3602 days ago
+8
It depends on the specific job fields. Most of the folks joining the military have prior service family members so they follow in their footsteps, which tends to be conservative areas and my grandad and dad voted republican, I might as well too.
Tends to be a lot of ammo, maintenance, grunt folks.
8
atooraya2 days ago
+163
It’s okay. They’ll vote republican again in 2028.
163
missed_sla2 days ago
+42
61% of them voted for Trump so I don't know what to tell them
42
BigJellyfish19062 days ago
+9
Why self sensor?
9
nazerall2 days ago
+19
Voice to text
19
hoverbeaver2 days ago
+7
My phone actually puts in the swears. Or did you say eff asterisk asterisk asterisk asterisk asterisk asterisk?
7
turikk2 days ago
+2
Google keyboard does not
2
hoverbeaver2 days ago
+7
Aw, dang, that’s f******* unfortunate
7
Bob_Chris2 days ago
+2
Oh it definitely can.
2
Kewkky2 days ago
+340
I was in the Navy. I'd be SO f****** pissed at Trump if my 6-month deployment was extended to a year or more (in this case, 10 months so far) and I got no f****** liberty ports in the meantime. I'm pissed just reading this article's title.
340
ParabolicHyperbole2 days ago
+80
Same. Did 18 years, most of them on the carrier. I wonder how many chemlights / float coats have gone over the side thus far. I can’t imagine the mental toll this is taking on the crew + air wing.
80
lolofaf2 days ago
+28
As someone who doesnt know, what are chemlights and float coats, and why are they important for the mental wellbeing of the crew?
28
ParabolicHyperbole2 days ago
+128
“Float coats” are just a different term for life preserver. They’re required for anyone who’s on the flight deck. They also have a little beacon in them that is saltwater activated, so if you fall overboard it turns on a strobe light and sends out a radio signal that’s received onboard the ship. Aviation rescue swimmers also use chemlights (glow sticks) to mark them when they’re in the water at night.
Whenever one of these float coat beacons goes off, or if someone spots a chem light in the water, a “man overboard” is called, and Every. Single. Person. onboard the carrier has to muster immediately. The rescue helicopter that’s on Alert status also launches immediately to search for/pick up the person in the water. It’s a real pain in the ass. When you’re on the later months of deployment, some people will throw a float coat/chemlight overboard because they’re pissed off at the world and want to make everyone miserable with them.
128
lolofaf2 days ago
+32
Thank you! The context is incredibly helpful
32
nowahhh2 days ago
+22
> some people will throw a float coat/chemlight overboard because they’re pissed off at the world and want to make everyone miserable with them.
They're just like me fr
22
CatrionaShadowleaf1 day ago
+2
We spent an entire f****** week on one deployment getting a man overboard call every night. Day check was completely wiped out by day 4. I hope they found the a****** who was doing it. Either way it finally stopped after that week, but it was abject f****** misery.
2
Healthy-Stage-1422 days ago
+12
Some members may not make it. I lost a buddy who ... Well yea.. after his deployment was extended.
12
Finn-reddit2 days ago
+9
I lost a cousin that way. F****** pointless.
9
tcmart142 days ago
+2
Y’all had that problem too on the carriers? I was on an LHD and it was usually bored Marines since for like 5 months out of a 7 month deployment the have nothing to do but watch anime and occasionally ship’s tax.
2
thewolf92 days ago
+142
Especially given that anywhere you stop you’re now hated by the locals
142
picaohm2 days ago
+20
Hey shipmate guess it's on the dinner menu tonight!?!
20
merrysunshine22 days ago
+7
Not much bc they’re running out of food
7
Stevil4583LBC2 days ago
+11
Coming home from desert storm, we got sent to Bangladesh to anchor in the bay for a month.
11
mschuster912 days ago
+7
>and I got no f****** liberty ports in the meantime
IIRC they did get shore leave while the ship was in Split, Croatia for a week worth of repairs.
7
Missile_Lawnchair2 days ago
+16
These sailors are going to absolutely destroy the next port they have liberty at lol
16
FreeUsePolyDaddy2 days ago
+18
Which is something else that already doesn't help foreign opinions of the US, and hasn't for decades.
18
Moneyshot_ITF2 days ago
+1
Military men will still heavily vote Republican
1
PabloPicasshooole2 days ago
+124
I'm sure they'll be able to see their families again soon...as soon as they're done in Cuba.
124
fyrefox452 days ago
+29
The carrier for Cuba is called Florida lol
29
MooPig482 days ago
+1
No, then they’re going to Greenland
You didn’t think he’d forgotten about Greenland, did you?
1
Ok-disaster20222 days ago
+27
Morale on board must be in the depths of the ocean. They can't even have a "beach day" to get some respite because they're in a war zone.
They need to be rotated out And given a break before they burn out completely.
27
otterpusrexII2 days ago
+11
My friend is missing the birth of his first son due to the extension. They planned on him being back a month before. He’s not the only one. This is where morale is sinking.
11
Double_Resort_92232 days ago
+76
Are the sailors still taking shits over the side of the flight deck?
76
WearySail50392 days ago
+51
Oh definitely. That happens even when the toilets work haha
51
RadiantEnvironment902 days ago
+20
Wait is this real or a joke? Cuz it feels like it could go either way.
20
bigmac220772 days ago
+23
Never heard of the poop deck?
23
mavajo1 day ago
+1
Just for anyone that doesn’t know - this is a joke. That’s not why it’s called the poop deck. It’s based on the French word for “stern”, *la poupe*.
1
Stevil4583LBC2 days ago
+8
Pro tip: sit in a helo net and let er rip
8
LalaKroft2 days ago
+2
As long as there's no great white shart attacks, it's fine
2
man_eat_man2 days ago
+23
It was just 1 year ago when they spent billions to "eliminate" the Houthi's threat at Red sea.
23
yassssssirrr2 days ago
+18
I was in the Navy. This is a nightmare. When people say that Hegseth spent all that money on steak and lobster, I knew what was up. F*** this administration.
18
BigJellyfish19062 days ago
+17
This is going to crater retention… and recruitment for that matter. And they deserve it.
17
spec-tickles1 day ago
+1
Ah don’t worry. I’m sure they’ll just kick the draft back on. Can’t resign if we’re all screwed.
1
Wayelder2 days ago
+8
Not easy to keep the rich pedophiles out of prison is it?
8
ckglle3lle2 days ago
+9
Hegseth and Trump despise armed service. They view them as servants to be exploited and berated. Trump views it as a low status job for losers who don't have connections. Hegseth thinks only in terms of movie tropes and memes. The only amount of shit either is able to summon for any serviceman is PR stunts and managing a media cycle.
9
MyPants2 days ago
+89
Can't wait to see the movie in ten years about how sad the sailors were to be bombing school girls.
89
Time_News_84522 days ago
+27
Epic Furious
Starring an AI copy of Chuck Norris as a pilot shot down behind Iranian lines. Even on the ground he carries on his mission and infiltrates the Iranian secret storage of nuclear material and disables it before being rescued. Afterwards he proudly proclaims mission accomplished to president Trump, played by Dolph Lundgren with a digitally de-aged body.
27
moldivore2 days ago
+15
"Who you writing that letter to Johnny? Your girlfriend? Hahaah"
"Yeah yeah, laugh it up Tim. I'm just writing a letter to our secretary of war, Pete Hegseth, to thank him for going to war for Jesus. Someone has to let him know we back him 100% He's just done so much for us and the American people."
15
FlirtyFluffyFox2 days ago
+8
I'm glad someone else though the hurt locker or whatever it was called was f****** creepy
8
IvoShandor2 days ago
+16
Is this the carrier with the broken toilets and waste system? Sounds like a Carnival Cruise.
16
Time_News_84522 days ago
+6
A real shit show
6
KDR_11k2 days ago
+2
And burning laundry.
2
mt66062 days ago
+1
It's a POS. If hegseth wants to sacrifice something, the ford will be it.
1
markth_wi2 days ago
+7
Every single decision is harmful to the United States - and always has been.
7
WasteBinStuff2 days ago
+24
That's a f****** horrible record to have to break.
A really "shitty" record to make them break, Petey.
There's not a single sailor aboard that ship who is happy about that record. I'm sure that there are plenty of gung-ho boys and girls aboard who got to the point where they figured, "F*** it. We're close, might as well be proud to break it if we're close anyway."
....but not one of them is happy about it.
And it sure doesn't help with retention and recruiting.
24
Ok-disaster20222 days ago
+12
It's amazing but I think the GOP found the worst SECDEF since McNamara.
12
WasteBinStuff2 days ago
+12
Aah. McNamara was bad in his way, but he at least had nominal and relevant qualifications. Hegseth is unqualified, dangerously incompetent, and a juvenile prick on top of it. If Hegseth lasts anywhere near as long as McNamara ,God help us and our soldiers.
12
Goldenrule-er2 days ago
+1
You forgot that he's also a raging alcoholic, but I suppose that was included under "dangerously incompetent".
1
Dust6012 days ago
+25
They’re at 295 days. Longest ever was like 322 article says. With no end to the war in Iran in sight they’re probably gonna break the all time record
25
Leafy02 days ago
+17
I mean they’re probably over a 20 day sail away from a home port anyways unless they go to Hawaii , so they’re pretty much guaranteed to break the record at this point. Unless they legit try and sail home at top speed the whole way.
17
Wipperwill12 days ago
+13
I was in the middle of deployment in 2001, 9/11. We were gone for 214 days. Of those, 142 days without a port.
13
Dust6012 days ago
+6
I really don’t know how ya’ll do it, and have so much respect for everyone who does. 142 days on a ship, that’s insane to me. I know how massive some of the ships are, but I get uncomfortable just thinking about it.
My brother was on a destroyer, but luckily was stationed in Japan so I don’t think he ever had to do any crazy long stretches.
6
Wipperwill12 days ago
+4
Before that, the longest I'ld ever stayed underway was 24 days.
3 months was doing a circle in the Indian Ocean waiting for our marines to come back. They were, i'm told, refurnishing an old Pakistani airbase. When they finished the army and airforce flew in and took it over. Those guys looked rough after 90 days without running water.
4
laptopAccount21 day ago
+2
Pretty much no days off either and a strict sleep schedule.
2
Several-Squash98712 days ago
+3
At this point I don't see that not happening. They have been forgotten about in the abyss of ships and the this n that's going on. These guys and gals don't even register as a blip on the hire ups radar. They are just a pawn to push around on a table. There's no human element to it anymore. I couldn't imagine... if they can keep them out for the entirety of the war they absolutely will. THEY DO NOT CARE ABOUT THEM!
3
merrysunshine22 days ago
+3
I wonder how often they’ve gone River City too.
3
Several-Squash98712 days ago
+2
More than enough I'm sure...
2
captHij2 days ago
+6
It would be surprising if there were not more than a few ring-knockers who are ecstatic to be able to prop up their profile with this in their service record.
6
outerproduct2 days ago
+8
This kind of a record isn't a good thing, it's a stupid thing, a very stupid thing.
8
EffingNewDay2 days ago
+5
I wonder what the rates of NJP are onboard?
5
Fonalder2 days ago
+5
"Can't get into trouble if you are on the boat all day every day" - Navy Leadership
5
KDR_11k2 days ago
+4
https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2026/04/16/iran-war-mail-packages-middle-east/89609308007/
They're running low on food, too. The Trump administration truly sucks at everything.
4
Keyann2 days ago
+1
Is that grey thing a tongue?
1
GeshtiannaSG2 days ago
+1
It’s that food Rey got at the start of The Force Awakens.
1
croolshooz2 days ago
+3
This is not a good record to break.
3
Suns_In_4202 days ago
+3
Going to be a lot of people not re-upping when they get back to port.
3
msr42day2 days ago
+3
As previously stated, SOS- save our sailors. Pres47/admin47 have no reference point for what these extra-long deployments do to the sailors, their families, and the ships and aircraft.
Serving in extra hot climates also does nothing for morale, except wear it thin.. Add to that the knowledge that the Iranians have the right weapons to destroy these top of the line ships.
Astonishingly wrong, pres47/admin47/joint chiefs of staff. But, the sailors are only fodder to these " mission without a cause" planners.
3
obbie292 days ago
+3
The US is like a toddler with no supervision
3
spribyl2 days ago
+2
There are no winners here
2
mriguy2 days ago
+8
Sure there are - the Russians in the near term, and the Chinese in the longer term. It will be a lot easier to take Taiwan when the US can no longer fully crew their carriers.
8
mschuster912 days ago
+1
Russia is headed for the shitters either way, demographically, economically and politically. Everyone noticed that Russia didn't come to Iran's aid and, more importantly because they actually had a security pact, Armenia's aid when Azerbaijan went on a genocide.
Agreed when it comes to China though. Mid term, it won't help them much outside of Taiwan because China has zero army resources to project meaningful force outside of its immediate vicinity. But long term? Oh boy did Trump bring a lot of other countries to shift to China.
1
Dry-Peach-63272 days ago
+2
Does AP not edit their shit anymore? What’s the “Mediterranean See”?
2
Spaceball862 days ago
+7
It's a Pope's holiday residence
7
20frvrz1 day ago
+1
Newsdesks started firing their copy editors and fact checkers back in Trump's first term, no joke. The integrity of our media has been in a slow downward spiral ever since, it's just been expedited recently.
1
Low-Invite26472 days ago
+2
I bet the sailors are loving that.🤦🏽♂️
2
refep2 days ago
+2
> The ship’s 295th day at sea surpassed the previous longest deployment by an aircraft carrier in the past 50 years, when the USS Abraham Lincoln was sent out for 294 days in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic, according to data compiled by U.S. Naval Institute News, a news outlet run by the U.S. Naval Institute, a nonprofit organization.
Huh why did the USS Abraham Lincoln spend 294 days at sea during covid
2
Sw0rdMaiden2 days ago
+3
Ask the Portsmouth electrical division working on the USS Harry Truman at the time. That's why the Abe was extended.
3
SaveTheAles2 days ago
+1
Do they get a ribbon for longest deployment?
1
Qcgreywolf2 days ago
+1
Ugh. I am so sorry my brothers in arms. I am soooo sorry.
1
MRHubrich2 days ago
+1
As a vet that has done 2 6-month deployments, I guarantee that my shipmates are not happy about it.
1
Direlion2 days ago
+1
These sailors are in the suck, of that I have no doubt.
1
macross19842 days ago
+1
Well, when you serve on aircraft carriers, you will run the risk of super deployment as it is happening now.
Though modern carriers are immeasurably better than those from WW II aircraft carrier it is an warship and warship is not creature of comfort.
1
CalmTrifle2 days ago
+1
Remember, it is not just the Ford itself. There are other ships with her. This CSG has about 6,000 or more people.
1
StriveNJive882 days ago
+1
Prob gonna break that record a few more times over… it ain’t over
1
unhallowed10142 days ago
+1
Anyone have an idea of the average cost per day of keeping a carrier deployed is ?
1
Egon882 days ago
+1
>The world’s largest aircraft carrier, the USS Gerald R. Ford, broke the U.S. record Wednesday for the longest post-Vietnam War deployment, a nearly 10-month span that saw it take part in both the military raid in Venezuela and the Iran war.
Can anyone knowledgeable tell me, in a situation like this, is basically the same crew the whole time or would they be rotating people in (in large numbers I mean, not just a few people here and there) to prevent burnout?
Would it be the same commanders the entire time as well?
1
20frvrz1 day ago
+2
It's the same crew the whole time.
2
Queermagedd0n2 days ago
+1
That's not a record we should be proud of...
1
veryboredatwork2 days ago
+1
I bet morale is really high among the crew who haven’t seen their families for ages….. sorry, I forgot they’re not humans but Hegseths ‘Warfighters’
1
Libinky1 day ago
+1
How’s the mess? No good food, no good toilets WTF?
Who is commander in chief?
Oh yeah
1
Leading-Debate-92781 day ago
+1
Nothing makes sailors happier than extending their tours.
1
Jeeves-Godzilla1 day ago
+1
Those poor families. The spouse is on the ship and the other at home taking care of kids by themselves for 10 months. They really need to rotate their crew, that is bad for morale
1
warrant2k1 day ago
+1
There's nothing honorable, heroic, or happy about this.
Navy life, especially on an aircraft carrier is hard, grueling, loud, and dangerous. The crew needs port calls to catch a break, physically and mentally. Staying at sea, especially not during wartime, just wears them down.
There is also the strain put on families at home. The sailor is missing births, deaths, birthdays, holidays, first steps, graduations, sports and events, the list goes on. This prolonged separation can strain the marriage, sometimes breaking them.
1
Traditional-Look88391 day ago
+1
Just out of curiosity, at what point on ship deployments does it stop feeling like you’re a soldier and morso a prisoner?
1
chasehundreds1 day ago
+1
Probably about 4-5 months depending on your rate (job). They try to bring morale up with beer, but it’s milestones set for that.
1
Jumpstart_4111 day ago
+1
All that money. Someone is getting paid.
1
kctjfryihx991 day ago
+1
I know it’s not the point, but that’s not what “record” means
1
jackrabbit3231 day ago
+1
A lot of what they say about military wives when their husbands go on long deployments is true. I'd believe it if they said they started the laundry fire on one of those carriers on purpose.
A not insignificant number is going to come home to an empty house and divorce papers too.
1
armedandfriendly1 day ago
+1
I mean I wasn't in the Navy so I don't know what being on one for that long is like but my longest deployment was 15 months. 10 doesn't seem bad.
1
urbanek252517 hr ago
+1
I remember visiting and bringing meals and stuff to my friend's family when he was deployed to Iraq for absolutely no good reason. The kids missed him. His wife was stoic, but exhausted.
At least with Iraq, they could pretend it had something to do with 9/11. Protecting America, right?
This time, it's almost impossible to pretend it's for a good cause. Maduro never hurt the US. Iran wasn't hurting the US. They're out there for an unreasonably long time for no good reason except to give Hegseth an excuse be stupid and embarrass the US Military again.
1
helly108016 hr ago
+1
We should all be so proud.
1
clera_echo14 hr ago
+1
Alexander the Great’s soldiers mutinied when their campaign dragged on for too long, and they were winning, too.
1
AntiseptikCN14 hr ago
+1
How's the food? Got enough TP, although the Gerald Ford probably has plenty...? I bet morale is in the toilet...
1
What_Is_This_112 hr ago
+1
Is this the one you that pics of their food seems to show they are on restricted rations?
1
teddykaygeebee2 days ago
+1
Jfc. We were extended after a six-month deployment to help with Katrina. To me, that was insanely long.
Sucks for them.
1
LavenderCas2 days ago
+1
What does the title mean? Breaks the record except in Vietnam someone was deployed longer? So, they have just been deployed for a long time?
1
IllustriousPhone982 days ago
+2
It's the longest in over 50 years. If that helps you.
2
makerofshoes2 days ago
+1
It’s confusing. My dad was on the USS Midway in the Vietnam war, which held the record for longest deployment. I remember in the 00’s in the war on terror there was a news story about how some ship was going to break that record, because my dad commented on it at the time.
But now it says the Lincoln was deployed for 294 days and now the Ford is going to be 295. But then another article says that the Nimitz had a 341 day deployment in 2020/21, while the Midway was 332 days
1
20frvrz1 day ago
+2
I've been trying to get more information on this, and this is what I've found so far:
* [The USS Midway was deployed for 327 days from April 10th, 1972 to March 3rd, 1973](https://www.history.navy.mil/content/dam/nhhc/research/archives/command-operation-reports/vietnam/Midway%201973.pdf). I keep seeing 332 days as the reported number, but the link I provided contains those dates on page 4, which comes out to 327 days.
* They keep reporting on "post-Cold War era" records, so they're talking about records that have been set since the end of the Cold War in 1991.
* [The Nimitz was away from home for 341 days, however, it had extended isolation periods ashore to prevent COVID from spreading. ](https://news.usni.org/2026/04/15/uss-gerald-r-ford-breaks-post-cold-war-deployment-record)I'm not sure what the details of those periods are, but that appears to be the reason their record isn't counted.
* Re: a ship breaking the Midway's record in the 00s - the only thing I can find is the [USS Abraham Lincoln's 290 day deployment in 2003](https://news.usni.org/2026/04/15/uss-gerald-r-ford-breaks-post-cold-war-deployment-record).
It's been really hard to sort through these details, so if you or your dad have any insight I'd love to hear it! (I'm particularly perplexed by the dates of the Midway's deployment)
169 Comments