· 150 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 9, 2026 at 2:17 AM

US Army veteran charged with leaking classified information to journalist

Posted by IllustriousPark4487

🚩 Report this post

150 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
deraser Apr 9, 2026 +1022
Couldn’t copy the whole story (IDK why), but here is the important bit: “WASHINGTON, April 8 (Reuters) - A U.S. Army veteran was charged ​on Wednesday with providing classified information to a journalist for a book that alleged drug trafficking, murder ‌and corruption at a military base where she had worked, the Department of Justice said. Courtney Williams, 40, of Wagram, North Carolina, was indicted by a federal grand jury on charges related to "her alleged transmission of classified national defense information to individuals not authorized to receive it, including ​a journalist," the Justice Department said in a statement. Prosecutors alleged Williams violated a provision of the U.S. Espionage ​Act.”
1022
drewwhose Apr 9, 2026 +1242
She also talked a lot about all the sexual harassment and racism in the spec ops. Don’t trust this DoJ
1242
kstargate-425 Apr 9, 2026 +470
This is the only thing she has going for her as for one the courts already dont trust the [DoJ with them entering fraudulent evidence in court in 35 separate cases](https://youtu.be/2RMqaMQIHKo?si=SuIMApkkFZQKSFpd) in just the first 9 months (happened once in previous decade) and also thry have either run off or fired all the competent AG's and staff. Hopefully she has good attorneys that will rip this to pieces as f*** that, the SecDef and many other WH officials leaked top secret info that could get servicemen killed yet was brushed under the rug. The whole SignalGate thing happened multiple times as well and wasnt just a one time thing besides it being months after the Pentagon released an OpSec Special Bulletin saying specifically not to use Signal or its clones for official business yet they continued to use it.
470
Lastcaressmedown138 Apr 9, 2026 +108
I mean How many times did kegbreath get caught sending shit to people he shouldnt or through ways he’s not supposed to..
108
orionxavier99 Apr 9, 2026 +21
I was gonna say the president too but you are also correct.
21
GoodOmens Apr 9, 2026 +60
I'm all for throwing people leaking information to our adversaries for money (e.g., Aldrich Ames) or even just for lolz points like Jack Teixeira in jail but if this person was trying to whistle blow / showcase corruption then WTF.
60
P01135809-Trump Apr 9, 2026 +29
My country has laws to protect whistleblowers. I'm not sure if America has laws.
29
reddit_ending_soon Apr 9, 2026 +33
> I'm not sure if America has laws. We really dont have laws anymore. Its only a matter of time before everyone catches on.
33
SlickStyle Apr 9, 2026 +20
We have laws, but our laws only protect people who have enough money to pay the people who know how to manipulate them.
20
Numerous_Photograph9 Apr 9, 2026 +9
It does, but they've lately been under attack or just ignored. At least by the DOJ or Congress. The courts I think have been better about upholding them. But, whistleblowing also is a legal or oversight process, not just going to the press, so not sure it's relevant here.
9
6thReplacementMonkey Apr 10, 2026 +1
We have laws but they are for protecting rich people and oppressing poor people.
1
PaarthurnaxUchiha Apr 9, 2026 +45
Not just a cool guy unit — but Delta specifically. That doesn’t surprise me, but it’s a let down. These communities typically get filled by people who run their brains on pure testosterone like they are operating a diesel.
45
memberzs Apr 9, 2026 +5
The big question is was the information she gave known to her to be classified or what it just memoir type information about her experience. And entirely unknown to her the info was part of some classified investigation or data set.
5
Jmizzy978 Apr 9, 2026 +10
If you read the indictment, she texted the journalist on the day the book/article was published upset that he used all the classified information she gave him. She said she thought she was just giving him background on how the unit worked but that he wouldn’t publish those things. She then emailed her mother that she would probably be arrested. Her mom asked why, and she replied that she disclosed classified information to someone and even quoted the relevant criminal statute. The article included a lot of information about how they set up cover identities, procure cell phones for covert use, set up front companies, etc. I don’t think they will have any problem proving she knew she was disclosing classified information.
10
TM627256 Apr 10, 2026 +1
She was a TS/SCI holder who was working withing JSOC. She knew what was and wasn't classified, that's a foregone conclusion with her background. It's like asking whether a CIA deep cover agent knew whether they were deep cover lol.
1
memberzs Apr 10, 2026 +1
There's a difference between I witnessed these illegal activities And these illegal activities were documented and classified.
1
TM627256 Apr 10, 2026 +3
It isn't about witnessed illegal activities. She went into detail about how she personally arranged for and procured cover stories and documentation for operators within the command. She also went into detail disclosing how shell corporations are established and maintained throughout the country which enable covert ops around the world. That's what she's being charged with disclosing, not her abuse allegations.
3
Barragin Apr 9, 2026 +185
This is about shit that went down at Bragg, and it's all true....
185
TK_4Two1 Apr 9, 2026 +16
And we held those men in such high regards...
16
James-W-Tate Apr 9, 2026 +3
F****** Fayetteville.
3
OkStop8313 Apr 10, 2026 +3
How does Bragg seem to account for half the recent military scandals? WTF is going on there?!
3
Barragin Apr 10, 2026 +2
Everything - drugs, murder, cartel links, child prostitution even. You name it. [https://www.fayobserver.com/story/news/crime/2026/04/04/73-child-sexual-exploitation-counts-filed-against-fort-bragg-soldier/89438549007/?gnt-cfr=1&gca-cat=p&gca-uir=false&gca-epti=z11xx49p119450l117150c119450u002949e007700v11xx49&gca-ft=103&gca-ds=sophi](https://www.fayobserver.com/story/news/crime/2026/04/04/73-child-sexual-exploitation-counts-filed-against-fort-bragg-soldier/89438549007/?gnt-cfr=1&gca-cat=p&gca-uir=false&gca-epti=z11xx49p119450l117150c119450u002949e007700v11xx49&gca-ft=103&gca-ds=sophi) [https://www.wfae.org/show/charlotte-talks-with-mike-collins/2025-12-28/fort-bragg-cartel-author-discusses-drug-trafficking-and-murders-impacting-the-u-s-special-forces](https://www.wfae.org/show/charlotte-talks-with-mike-collins/2025-12-28/fort-bragg-cartel-author-discusses-drug-trafficking-and-murders-impacting-the-u-s-special-forces)
2
lafolieisgood Apr 9, 2026 +93
So it wasn’t even about this war effort but just shady shit that happened on her base when she was active? Yet Seal Team 6 members can write books and profit off their service?
93
Mitchard_Nixon Apr 9, 2026 +60
Well her information was true.
60
TM627256 Apr 10, 2026 +2
And she went into very deep specifics on how things were done, down to specific locations, towns, agencies. Not just "this one of in this one country that ended with 'stan' we raided a collection of buildings with bad guys in them. Also, most of the SEAL and Delta guys vet their books through the DOD to allow them to redact or approve things based on their current classification. She didn't.
2
calguy1955 Apr 9, 2026 +124
The trumpets call her a leaker. I call her a whistle blower.
124
pabo81 Apr 9, 2026 +15
Technically to be afforded the protections of a whistle blower you need to disclose the information to some sort of law enforcement or regulatory agency (like CID or the Inspector General).
15
PresentRaspberry6814 Apr 9, 2026 +27
even when they are patently compromised?
27
Numerous_Photograph9 Apr 9, 2026 +11
Unfortunately, the law is written like that. One can hope that if those "proper" legal routes don't pan out that public opinion can protect you when going outside those channels. If the case becomes big enough, oversight in Congress may protect someone.
11
Actual-Recipe7060 Apr 10, 2026 +1
She leaked classified information. Not a whistleblower
1
calguy1955 Apr 10, 2026 +2
So all they have to do when they commit or cover up criminal activity is call any information about it “classified”?
2
Actual-Recipe7060 Apr 10, 2026 +1
No, she leaked classified information and Unit TTPs. She broke the two NDAs she signed. Whistleblowers leak for the public good. What she leaked wasn't anything that impacts the public.  
1
ThunderheadStudio Apr 9, 2026 +48
Was it Ft Hood? I mean it could easily be a half dozen. These problems aren't exactly deep under wraps.
48
PaarthurnaxUchiha Apr 9, 2026 +61
Fort Bragg, Delta teams or Delta related.
61
CaliforniaNavyDude Apr 9, 2026 +7
None of those allegations would be classified. I don't know what information they are saying she shared that's classified, but if that's all there is, those allegations should be investigated. Not charge the soldier who talked about them.
7
Jmizzy978 Apr 9, 2026 +7
If you read the article/book, she revealed a lot of details about how the unit operates. She talked about how they establish cover identities, that operators often travel under civilian cover using front companies (and how those companies are established and maintained), how they procure cell phones directly from manufacturers, back-door agreements they have with State DMVs, credit card companies, etc. to generate real (yet fake) identities. I'm sure a good deal of that is classified, even if informed observers could probably guess all of that happens. Further, she sent a text to the journalist the day the article was published pissed off that he published all that information. She thought it was just for background and that he would only publish the harassment claims. It looks like 1) she messed up by telling him way more details about her job at the unit than necessary and, 2) the journalist screwed her over big time.
7
CaliforniaNavyDude Apr 9, 2026 +3
Yeah, I refuse to use news sources with predatory terms of service, so I couldn't read the article. The things you describe would very much be classified and she should be prosecuted for such revelations. That author shot themselves in the foot over this, though, because they totally screwed over their source. Who's gonna wanna talk to them after this? Who's gonna want to hire them? Rule #1 in journalism, protect your source. This kind of failure can lead to lifelong ostracization, deservedly so.
3
Local-Hand6022 Apr 9, 2026 +2
The author didn't have a story without all the cool james bond esque details about how Delta Force operates. Without those the story is just random woman sues her employer over a few inappropriate comments and settles out if court. If she was smarter and had some self awareness she would have realized that. 
2
CaliforniaNavyDude Apr 9, 2026 +2
The fault for this is on both her and the journalist. She knew she shouldn't share that classified information with anyone and the journalist violated ethics to publish it.
2
Local-Hand6022 Apr 9, 2026 +1
Not really. Only she had a legal obligation to keep classified information to herself. The fact that she had the very poor judgment to risk her life by trusting a journalists ethics really tells you everything you need to know about this woman. 
1
CaliforniaNavyDude Apr 9, 2026 +1
The works of John Locke may help you understand the points I'm driving at, and why the two here can both be in the wrong in separate ways. There's a lot of videos on YouTube and some solid podcasts that cover it in a digestible way.
1
ohgodimbleeding Apr 9, 2026 +5
Fort Bragg / Fort Liberty.
5
MovieGuyMike Apr 9, 2026 +3
Sounds like a hero to me.
3
Lone-Pilgrim Apr 9, 2026 +2
So this whole thing totally validates what Harp was writing about.
2
Trust_me_I_am_doctor Apr 9, 2026 +2
The journalist was the author of the book The Fort Bragg Cartel. In the book there's a whole part where he talks about a former civilian admin worker in Delta Force who was constantly subjected to sexual harassment throughout her career. She said there's absolutely no one to go to because they are all protected. The book is great but if you're a happy American propaganda Kool-Aid drinker, you should probably pass.
2
play_images Apr 9, 2026 +3
Yeah good luck trying spin this as a security risk when this administration is notorious for leaking shit. On top of the point of what she shared was sexual assault in the military, funny how we never seem to want to talk about the f****** HORRID treatment women get in the military.
3
OkStop8313 Apr 10, 2026 +1
Are drug trafficking, murder, and corruption vital to national defense?
1
alnarra_1 Apr 9, 2026 +1
Wait is this in relation to the Ft Bragg Cartell book?
1
Dracoson Apr 9, 2026 +2544
It's only cool if you do it over Signal...everyone knows that
2544
baronvonpoopy Apr 9, 2026 +551
She should’ve typed in “we are clean on OPSEC.” That makes everything kosher, right?
551
Dracoson Apr 9, 2026 +128
Probably best not to use the word kosher with this administration.
128
barktwiggs Apr 9, 2026 +72
Kosher is cool as long as it's Bibi firing missiles at brown people. Everything else is par for the antisemitic course.
72
CO420Tech Apr 9, 2026 +41
I love how they've labeled it "antisemitic" to say anything negative about Israel as a country, regardless of whether you're talking about Jewish people or simply their government's actions.
41
A-Bone Apr 9, 2026 +25
Well..   that's how propaganda works. 
25
JFKsBrain Apr 9, 2026 +22
The real military guys were clean on OPSEC, until tough guy Hegseth started his drunken boasting.
22
fellatio-del-toro Apr 9, 2026 +1
OPSECS a go, commence spillage, ready to copy, over.
1
Clayp2233 Apr 9, 2026 +82
Or at Maralago as Trump did with a journalist and staffer, showing them attack plans on Iran
82
JFKsBrain Apr 9, 2026 +44
The “situation room” at Maralago is just a draped off part of that shithole’s chintzy ballroom.
44
cyb3rg0d5 Apr 9, 2026 +14
It’s ok, they talk really quiet so nobody can hear them.
14
JFKsBrain Apr 9, 2026 +6
lol. I highly doubt that that uncouth b****** is even capable of speaking quietly.
6
RenamedAccount185516 Apr 9, 2026 +1
Cone of silence
1
Different_Victory_89 Apr 9, 2026 +1
Cone of shame
1
Beard_Hero Apr 9, 2026 +2
If it happened while he was potus, then it’s allowed because the power of classification originates from the office of the potus (with a few exceptions). Does that make it okay or wise? Absolutely not. But if it was when he wasn’t potus, then it’s definitely illegal.
2
Clayp2233 Apr 9, 2026 +4
It was when he wasn’t potus, it was part of the jack smith indictments. He’s on audio saying “I could have declassified these but I didn’t” and the staffer sounds uncomfortable that they’re being shown the documents
4
Beard_Hero Apr 10, 2026 +2
Roger dodger. I assumed that was the instance being referenced, but I also wasn’t going to pin it down to a single instance because he’s probably done it several times.
2
Clayp2233 Apr 10, 2026 +1
Yeah an Australian billionaire accused him of showing him nuclear submarine documents among “scores” of other classified documents when he was out of office.
1
alppu Apr 9, 2026 +13
Or stack the papers in your bathroom
13
Annual_Strategy_6206 Apr 9, 2026 +1
With a copier. Doesn't everyone have a copier in their bathroom?
1
sasquatchmarley Apr 9, 2026 +22
Honestly though, why not have your lawyer argue in court that Hegseth and the rest of them did the same openly and faced no repercussions, call for dismissal of the case and have a judge state why the two cases are different. Have it put on record at least.
22
fotosaur Apr 9, 2026 +2
And drunk… again
2
mvw2 Apr 9, 2026 +2
Or at a get together in Mar-a-lago.
2
joshhupp Apr 9, 2026 +2
I get my Top Secret info from gold plated bathrooms
2
skrilledcheese Apr 9, 2026 +3
And in Warthunder forums.
3
dudedudd Apr 9, 2026 +1
Sadly, that was just them being inept. (Which they should have been jailed for as well).  She purposely leaked the info. 
1
A_Nonny_Muse Apr 9, 2026 +1
Or quietly and directly to a Russian server, like how Doge did it.
1
Heimerdingerdonger Apr 9, 2026 +838
Draft Dodger Goes Scot Free After Storing Classified Intel In Public Bathroom
838
MIAMarc Apr 9, 2026 +186
and selling it to our enemies don't forget that
186
EverythingGoodWas Apr 9, 2026 +90
And manipulating the stock market with it
90
kwangqengelele Apr 9, 2026 +6
And raping children for decades
6
igloojoe Apr 9, 2026 +59
Remember when Trump gave Russia information on all our spies overseas...
59
syynapt1k Apr 9, 2026 +10
How quickly that was forgotten..
10
Im_better_than__u Apr 9, 2026 +39
Immigrant loving draft dodger with anchor babies.
39
GirlNumber20 Apr 9, 2026 +134
She should have just stored classified information in a box in her bathroom and then told the journalist to go read it!
134
Moneyshot_ITF Apr 9, 2026 +30
That base is so f****** bad. During covid, special units were running it like the projects. Selling drugs, targeted beatings, etc
30
Superb_Health9413 Apr 9, 2026 +31
She should use the “I declassified it with my mind “ defense. Serious legal precedent.
31
drewroxx Apr 9, 2026 +126
I grew up and live outside FB. The book is very good and eye opening. It's funny they sue her because she shared her negative experiences but meanwhile every other ex SF in town is on podcasts and writing books and nobody cares.
126
ukexpat Apr 9, 2026 +59
Not “sue” (a civil matter), but “prosecute” (a criminal matter).
59
CHUBBYninja32 Apr 9, 2026 +65
This is for an older book about corruption and drug trafficking in the military. Not quite what Trump was fired up about.
65
anauthor Apr 9, 2026 +11
This DOJ is 100% corrupted and untrustworthy but, with that said, if you read the article there the leaker even expressed concern over text messages about the amount of classified material the author of the book was including, and she leaked information about TTP's used by our nations premier SOF units. It was not just her whistleblowing activities re: Sexual Assault and Harassment.
11
goldybear Apr 9, 2026 +27
Whistleblowers need to be protected. The pentagon papers changed the political landscape and anything that can do that for us now is welcome.
27
AngryMillennialFU Apr 9, 2026 +28
Meanwhile trump steals BOXES OF CLASSIFIED DOCS AND REFUSES TO GIVE THEM BACK AND THEN THE JUDGE HE APPOINTED AS HE WAS LEAVING THE WHITE HOUSE THROWS OUT THE SLAM DUNK CASE F*** THIS COUNTRY
28
groovypackage Apr 9, 2026 +18
Why do these people think that classifying illegal shit makes it go away?
18
rock_and_rolo Apr 9, 2026 +3
They think that because often it works. It is illegal to disclose, so there aren't many who can even investigate it.
3
Secure-Reading7225 Apr 9, 2026 +41
Wonder what he leaked. I can't pull open the article.
41
Glittering-Mirror602 Apr 9, 2026 +166
She apparently leaked info about super illegal shit happening with a unit out of Fort Bragg, chronicled in the book The Fort Bragg Cartel: Drug Trafficking and Murder in the Special Forces
166
duh_cats Apr 9, 2026 +32
Heard a podcast by the author and it sounded like a great book, but I quickly forgot about it. Glad I got another reminded to buy it.
32
Cerebral-Parsley Apr 9, 2026 +14
It is a fantastic book, can't recommend enough.
14
_kraftdinner Apr 9, 2026 +19
So I don’t have any connections to the military, just to give you an idea of my background. I loved this book. It was really interesting and the stories that the author was able to report were outstanding imho.
19
SophisticatedStoner Apr 9, 2026 +5
It's both fascinating and infuriating
5
Jess52 Apr 9, 2026 +4
QAA has a really good episode with the author too
4
sudoku7 Apr 9, 2026 +69
She leaked. WASHINGTON, April 8 (Reuters) - A U.S. Army veteran was charged ​on Wednesday with providing classified information to a journalist for a book that alleged drug trafficking, murder ‌and corruption at a military base where she had worked, the Department of Justice said. Courtney Williams, 40, of Wagram, North Carolina, was indicted by a federal grand jury on charges related to "her alleged transmission of classified national defense information to individuals not authorized to receive it, including ​a journalist," the Justice Department said in a statement. Prosecutors alleged Williams violated a provision of the U.S. Espionage ​Act. \[ not the full article, but enough of the start to get the gist , the rest of the article is mostly concern from free speech advocates \]
69
aaronhayes26 Apr 9, 2026 +124
Prosecuting veterans for blowing the whistle and making the military look bad. That should be good for morale.
124
theuncleiroh Apr 9, 2026 +36
It will be, since the goal is to keep using the military as a political arm that is happy to traffick drugs and kill innocent people.  They don't want normal people in the military. They want it to be an arm of those who hate most every American, and trafficking and murder are part of that
36
Delicious-History486 Apr 9, 2026 +3
Course government doesn't want bad publicity for Special Forces. Drag her through the courts, bankrupt her from attorney fees. Be another punching bag for the administration.
3
Impossible_IT Apr 9, 2026 +2
Without reading the article yet, would that be Fort Hood, Texas?
2
sudoku7 Apr 9, 2026 +2
Fort Bragg. She was there from 2010 to 2016, and the charge is over discussions she had in 2022 to 2025 with a journalist.
2
IllustriousPark4487 Apr 9, 2026 +28
I'm not sure what's going on with Reuters. They were never paywalled and now sometimes they are and sometimes they're not? This one is loading for me.
28
Kinasen Apr 9, 2026 +2
Reuters has been paywalled for a few years now, it's pretty unusable. BBC is also putting up a paywall, starting in the past few months.
2
gomezwhitney0723 Apr 9, 2026 +5
https://archive.ph/xm7Gn Here’s a link that you should be able to pull up.
5
gomezwhitney0723 Apr 9, 2026 +6
https://archive.ph/xm7Gn Non-paywall link for those unable to load the original.
6
ro536ud Apr 9, 2026 +36
Of course they pursue charges since she’s a woman. If she owned a golf club and kept them in the bathroom she’d get rewarded I thought whistleblowers were protected if they are telling information about crimes being committed? I know we are in an era where the doj and president are corrupt but is there precedent where this is wrong?
36
Decent-Lawyer-4922 Apr 9, 2026 +4
It's sort of like HR. They are never Your friend. They are there to protect the company from Any liability.
4
UnionsUnionsUnions Apr 9, 2026 +11
Whistleblowers deserve to be protected.
11
Ok_Cucumber_7954 Apr 9, 2026 +3
Why is criminal activity considered classified?
3
ShamanSix01 Apr 9, 2026 +4
Here I thought this was about Hegseth.
4
Neologic29 Apr 9, 2026 +7
Oh, now we're back to caring about this again? F*** this stupid government. National security is a f****** catch all for any shit they want to do. They don't deserve to keep these secrets from us any longer. I'm sick of this shit. Release it all. No f****** secrets. They have lost any assumption of benevolence when it comes to classifying information.
7
PlayfulSurprise5237 Apr 9, 2026 +8
Wait, Kegsbreath is getting held accountable for his leaks of Intel? Oh nevermind he's not a vet, he's just a jackass 
8
Wakeup_And_Piss Apr 9, 2026 +5
So why isn't Kegsbreath being indicted?
5
TurtleRocket9 Apr 9, 2026 +6
Hegseth didn’t get charged for it though
6
PutinBoomedMe Apr 9, 2026 +8
Dumbass. Everyone knows you leave your classified info printed out and in piles of boxes next your fake golden toilet. Guaranteed no prison time
8
VicGenesis Apr 9, 2026 +3
You can only give out classified info if another country pays for it and comes to you golf course. We all know this.
3
MrRoboto12345 Apr 9, 2026 +7
Surprised it's not within the War Thunder sphere this time
7
derangedplague Apr 9, 2026 +4
He declassified it with his mind though.
4
Other-Comfortable-64 Apr 9, 2026 +4
Cool, so Hegseth is going to be arrested then?
4
ShadowS812 Apr 9, 2026 +2
Guess you have to keep that shit in a unlock bathroom
2
Phronias Apr 9, 2026 +4
He should've just taken it home at let the journalist use their bathroom.
4
ItzMcShagNasty Apr 9, 2026 +4
Charged for whistleblowing about the crime ring the military at fort bragg runs, no charges for any of the people involved in the crimes themselves. Classic. Our country will be fully dead soon, and you do not want to live near fort bragg when the country breaks up.
4
Imaginary_Cow_6379 Apr 9, 2026 +3
Wait. So we’re *not* allowed to bring home documents again? I’m confused.
3
All_the_dinohorses Apr 9, 2026 +2
David Patraeus did it again?
2
Watsonwes Apr 9, 2026 +2
I read the book. It was great btw. There was absolutely nothing in there that was classified information. They just didn’t like being embarrassed
2
TheEldenRang Apr 9, 2026 +2
Why? Why are they being charged when this has haooened a thousand times over the past year and nobody has seen any consequences?
2
kaladin-throwaway Apr 9, 2026 +2
The drug trafficking and organized crime is an open secret at Fort Bragg. I hope it all gets exposed.
2
Icefyre24 Apr 10, 2026 +2
Reminds me of the whole thing with General Petraeus. He leaked things like : * Identities of covert officers. * War strategy and intelligence capabilities. * Notes from his meetings with President Obama. * Code words Despite leaking all that, he still only got 2 years probation, and a fine.
2
badpersian Apr 10, 2026 +2
Soo disclosing classified info is illegal? Like taking classified documents home and showing to pals?...
2
[deleted] Apr 9, 2026 +2
swim cobweb soup observation work caption continue liquid treatment rustic
2
PlayaNoir Apr 9, 2026 +3
>Harp said after the indictment that Williams was a "courageous whistleblower who exposed rampant gender discrimination and sexual harassment in ​the U.S. Army's Delta Force." ​He also said Williams ⁠wanted to be quoted by name in his work and cast the charges against her as "vague and weak." Is this the nature of the "classified" information?
3
EasternCandle Apr 9, 2026 +2
US President \*not\* investigated for ties to Epstein
2
Mo_Jack Apr 9, 2026 +1
Trump sells classified info out of Mar-A-Lago, and gives some away for free. What a friggin joke.
1
SleepingToDreaming Apr 9, 2026 +1
"Are you rich?" "No." "Do you have a dangerously stupid political group backing you up?" "No." "Are you the president who is a convicted felon who should be in prison for a multitude of things, but avoided it by being elected by said moronic group?" "No " "Well, it is guilty then."
1
musingofrandomness Apr 9, 2026 +1
I would be really curious what kind of actual legitimate classified information would be exposed in a discussion about drug trafficking and sexual assaults. You cannot legally classify something just because it embarrasses the government or government employees. Of course with the current regime, legality takes a back seat to their fragile egos. It would be one thing if the person shared classified locations or capabilities, but that entire discussion could be sanitized easily to "this event is alleged to have occurred at a forward deployed location", no details needed, it doesn't matter where it occurred so much as that it id alleged to have occurred and the names of the people involved. I suppose it is possible the names of the people involved could be classified due to their interaction, but that seems unlikely. Short of any further provided details, I am inclined to file this under "political witchhunt" with a goal of being an example to deter others.
1
hueythecat Apr 9, 2026 +1
Don’t leaks have to be vetted by Putin?
1
PDXGuy33333 Apr 10, 2026 +1
Streisand effect in effect.
1
jsmithers945 Apr 10, 2026 +1
“She”. “SHE”… “SHE”! One more time if you didn’t hear me. “SHE”
1
robcwag Apr 10, 2026 +1
The word for today, boys and girls, is SCAPEGOAT. Can you say SCAPEGOAT? I knew you could.
1
l0st1nP4r4d1ce Apr 9, 2026
I guessing this about Ft. Bragg. A notorious cesspit of band leadership and protectionism over favored recruits.
0
pre_pun Apr 9, 2026 +3
Anyone check Trump's bathroom lately?
3
Correct_Doctor_1502 Apr 9, 2026
Another whistleblower getting time for exposing government crimes
0
asu3dvl Apr 9, 2026 +1
Who gives an F? It’s all been reported to Putin by now, this sick orange traitor!
1
Andovars_Ghost Apr 9, 2026 -2
Oooooh. I thought my TS clearance meant ‘Tell Secret’. Whoopsie!
-2
strangebru Apr 9, 2026 +1
Now charge Hegseth for doing the exact same thing.
1
← Back to Board