· 184 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Mar 27, 2026 at 1:52 PM

U.S. can only confirm about a third of Iran's missile arsenal destroyed, sources say

Posted by punishhhher



🚩 Report this post

184 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
Ganjajp Mar 27, 2026 +999
TIL Obliterated=33%
999
twinsea Mar 27, 2026 +401
Decimated=10%
401
Ganjajp Mar 27, 2026 +94
The Romans' military policy.
94
euph_22 Mar 27, 2026 +63
Which, people don't realize how brutal Decimation was in Rome. Here is how Decimation works. So they had a unit that did a big bad and needs punishment, usually for mutiny or the like. So they divide them up into groups of 10. They have them draw lots. The 1 guy who loses was beat to death by the other 9.
63
Imbendo Mar 27, 2026 +43
It was super rare. There are periods of 300 years where it wasn’t used even once.
43
KP_Wrath Mar 27, 2026 +34
“Ok, you fucks, we have to break out the archaic punishment r******* wheel for this one.” “Please be vivisection for the leader, please be vivisection for the leader.” “Decimation!” “Oh, Jupiter dammit!”
34
Jive-Turkeys Mar 27, 2026 +14
Reads like a Seth McFarlane cutaway lol
14
KP_Wrath Mar 27, 2026 +8
I even googled to make sure I got the right god, it was originally going to be Zeus dammit, but that’s Greek, not Roman.
8
TheDwarvenGuy Mar 27, 2026 +8
They have the same etymology believe it or not The original Indo-European god was something along the lines of "Dyaus Phter", a cognate of "deus pater" in Latin meaning "sky father" In hinduism it became "Dyauspitr", in greek it became "Zeus Pater" aka Zeus, in Latin it became "Jupiter"
8
MagicCuboid Mar 27, 2026 +8
lmao it was a great image. To sound even more Roman invoke genitalia in your swearing. “Oh Jupiter’s c***!”
8
ParisGreenGretsch Mar 27, 2026 +6
It absolutely does now that you mention it. Solid observation.
6
Jive-Turkeys Mar 27, 2026 +2
Much obliged! I see you ;) I hope your focus has been dialed in lately!
2
ParisGreenGretsch Mar 27, 2026 +3
I'm so focused I can't even see straight.
3
euph_22 Mar 27, 2026 +12
That too. Also once legions were regularly putting up and overthrowing Emperors they basically could not use that kind of collective punishment any more.
12
SPC54 Mar 27, 2026 +5
Not sure about how it would’ve worked pre-Marian reforms or towards the end of the empire as the military structure changed but at the peak of the republic and into the early empire the Roman army structure looked something like this Legion > Cohort > Century > Contubernium The last of which was a grouping of 10 men who fought together in formation, shared a tent/pack animal and basically did everything together so whenever a decimation occurred it wouldn’t have just been some random guy in the legion you beat to death/got beaten by; it would’ve probably been someone from your contubernium who you knew relatively well and had history with. (I’m not a historian; full disclosure that this is just my own understanding and may not be 100% correct)
5
euph_22 Mar 27, 2026 +6
Also Roman enlistment periods were 20-25 years long (depending on the period) and legion structures were pretty stable. You were living, eating, chilling, fighting with these guys for years to decades.
6
Shiriru00 Mar 27, 2026 +2
I get that it's a bit harsh, but how else are you going to get them to polish their breastplate properly?
2
SsurebreC Mar 27, 2026 +4
[We have video of this ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brCVlLOKxrg) (NSFW)
4
Full-Ear87 Mar 27, 2026 +6
Damn they had some good cinematographers back in the first century BC
6
Imbendo Mar 27, 2026 +9
It wasn’t a universal policy and was only used during certain eras. And even then we only have a few documented examples. While iconic, it was largely used during the early Republic and revived in the late Republic/early Empire, not as a routine practice.
9
ZMeson Mar 27, 2026 +6
We decimated their missile stockpile 3 times over -- in fact we've almost decimated their stockpile 4 times over (just need to get to 34.4% destroyed for that).
6
riko77can Mar 27, 2026 +2
“Yo! Yo! Yo! *TRIPLE* decimated Whaaaaaaaat!” Official Pentagon Press Statement /s
2
UsagiTsukino Mar 27, 2026 +3
Decem = latin for ten.
3
tedsmitts Mar 27, 2026 +4
Which is why December is the tenth month of the year
4
Tiernoch Mar 27, 2026 +3
Correct, the original lunar calendar started in March and only had 10 months ending in December. January and February were added later because winter sucks.
3
YouGotDoddified Mar 27, 2026 +28
actually makes sense since it only took 33% of the country to vote for the fuckhead to obliterate the government
28
enginerd12 Mar 27, 2026 +15
33% of the time it works everytime.
15
Real_Skip_Bayless Mar 27, 2026 +19
It's almost like Iran has been planning for this exact scenario for...like...decades....
19
TheFoxsWeddingTarot Mar 27, 2026 +4
The part that’s gone is 100% gone. So 33% of the stuff we knew about which is 50% of the real total is now 100% gone.
4
Shintaro1989 Mar 27, 2026 +8
33% of the stock they knew about.
8
Skeeter_206 Mar 27, 2026 +2
Yeah, this is more than likely half that number.
2
Dartmouthest Mar 27, 2026 +2
TOTAL ANNIHILATION (I only had one and saved the rest for you and your classmates)
2
owen__wilsons__nose Mar 27, 2026 +2
I mean it's *basically* obliterated. What's the next number after 33, genius? 100, exactly.
2
SergeantThreat Mar 27, 2026 +2
To be fair, 1/3 of the gulf’s oil production capacity has been destroyed in this mess and I’d consider that obliterated
2
aquabarron Mar 27, 2026 +6
Keep in mind the launchers are over 75% destroyed. In military terms this and the above stat are definitely is “obliterated”. If at any point a military group suffers casualties at this rate it is total decimation, especially if they have barely touched the opposing force
6
qtx Mar 27, 2026 +12
> Keep in mind the launchers are over 75% destroyed. Visible* launchers.
12
GrandRub Mar 27, 2026 +6
"the opposing force" in this war isnt a armed force - its the international economy...
6
Sinocatk Mar 27, 2026 +570
Afghanistan was a mountain country with poor folks. Iran is a bigger mountainous country with a lot more money and people and weapons. Did the USA spend trillions and years to replace the taliban with the taliban and learn nothing?
570
JLRfan Mar 27, 2026 +259
Donald J Trump, learn something?
259
ZMeson Mar 27, 2026 +56
After his first term didn't go the way he wanted, he learned he had to appoint complete sycophants to all his cabinet positions, senior positions, and judgeships.
56
Sinocatk Mar 27, 2026 +13
Grifting? Sure he’s a pro!
13
smurfsundermybed Mar 27, 2026 +34
They did, but the current regime sacked the folks with that knowledge because they wouldn't go along with something that they spent years studying the futility and stupidity of doing.
34
Battle_Intense Mar 27, 2026 +13
We only spent tens of billions and a month to replace one Khamenei with another Khamenei, so I guess that's progress.
13
yaosio Mar 27, 2026 +12
The US learned that it's owners get richer with war.
12
xynith116 Mar 27, 2026 +20
Iranians are also highly educated and fanatically religious (not to say the Afghans aren’t but I don’t know much about them). Iran is no comparison to any previous country we’ve fought in the last 50 years, including Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, or any LATAM intervention. I think they’re more akin to North Korea in the Korean War in terms of national capability. So I think someone (everyone) in the WH / DoD doesn’t recognize that this isn’t the same level of fight that we’ve been used to for the last 50 years. Edit: I don’t mean that all Iranian people are fanatics. Just the people in power.
20
Sinocatk Mar 27, 2026 +18
Nah, I know some Iranians, some are a little crazy but most just are decent people. Don’t forget they were and are quite nice people just living their lives The other surrounding states don’t like their version of the book. So here we are
18
xynith116 Mar 27, 2026 +2
I’m not saying fanaticism means you’re crazy or a suicidal terrorist. That’s really US propaganda that’s been pushed since 2001. It just means you’re really motivated and aligned ideologically. Which in this context is good for Iran.
2
angular_circle Mar 27, 2026 +29
The Iranian people are likely the most secular in the Muslim world apart from Albania and the Kurds. That's why operation epic fail was preceded by 40k dead protestors. So no, not comparable with Afghanistan. Afghanistan was a failed nation building project. Iran is a proper nation already, its leadership is just not exactly preferred by many both on the in- and outside.
29
xynith116 Mar 27, 2026 +8
Perhaps their internal dissent is rising and that will turn into a problem at some point. Of course I would hope that the Iranian people would naturally choose to return to democracy like they had in 1953. But seeing them kill 40k people was not a sign of weakness of their regime. It was a clear sign of strength. To be able to kill that many people and face no follow on repercussions is a sign of strength. See for example, Tiananmen Square, the Soviet purges, etc. I think Trump only interpreted it as a sign of weakness because he thinks it showed the regime is desperate. But that’s probably far from the truth, and I don’t trust US media propaganda that’s says their internal structure is ready to collapse.
8
angular_circle Mar 27, 2026 +5
>But seeing them kill 40k people was not a sign of weakness of their regime. It was a clear sign of strength. I wasn't arguing against that, you just wrote that the "Iranians are fanatically religious", which isn't true. Iranians are at most moderately religious but oppressed by a fanatically religious regime.
5
likeahurricane Mar 27, 2026 +13
They've also been funding and therefore learning immensely from asymmetrical warfare in regional conflicts. The government and military structure is designed to operate autonomously. If we have boots on the ground, it's going to be fighting a decentralized, fanatical insurgency that will put Iraq's militias and the Taliban to shame.
13
Creatret Mar 27, 2026 +6
Remaines to be seen if they're good at fighting when the enemy shoots back. They don't issue warnings to their military and population for no reason.
6
Nessie-Swimms Mar 27, 2026 +5
No they aren't. Demographics shift show they are increasingly less religious. Only 32% of the population is Muslim. Then out of that group the number drops with practicing Muslims.
5
Alternative_Hour_614 Mar 28, 2026 +2
This an over the top generalization. Do you know any Iranians? Highly educated- absolutely. Fanatically religious? Not at all. In fact many are essentially secular.
2
Hungry_Orange666 Mar 27, 2026 +2
Maybe they operate under assumption that ruling regime isn't supported by majority of Iranians, and creating small window of opportunity to rise against regime will be enough.
2
Sialala Mar 27, 2026 +11
That window closed the moment Iran government started executing people in the streets 2 months ago. If this was about Iranian people, the attack should have been carried back then. Now it's about Israel and maybe Saudis getting what they want.
11
FunkyMonk100k Mar 27, 2026 +3
Tbf I think that’s when they started moving assets to the region. But I do agree, it’s too late to cause an uprising and may have solidified the folks on the fence against a common enemy
3
Feowen_ Mar 27, 2026 +193
But he said it was totally obliterated. Like over a week ago. I'm starting to think this Trump guy doesn't tell the truth.
193
angular_circle Mar 27, 2026 +33
They did "obliterate" the launchers. The strategy was always "kill the archer, not the arrow". A major issue for the US is now that drones don't need archers.
33
Old_Ladies Mar 27, 2026 +29
They are still launching ballistic missiles every day.
29
atrde Mar 27, 2026 +10
At a significantly lower rate
10
fourunderthebridge Mar 27, 2026 +7
Compared to the first 3 days. But over the last couple of weeks the number of launches have stabilized.
7
dsdvbguutres Mar 27, 2026 +5
1/3 of it is completely obliterated
5
Own-Development2437 Mar 27, 2026 +6
Well they obliterated the ones they found, just not the ones iran has hidden in mountain tunnels
6
bld44 Mar 27, 2026 +2
…. Just starting to?
2
16quida Mar 27, 2026 +84
Now I ain't the best at maths but the 90% that Trump was telling us doesn't equal 1/3
84
wrldruler21 Mar 27, 2026 +31
The original military briefing probably told Trump the missiles were "90% disabled" or "90% rendered ineffective". Missiles buried under rubble are not a threat.... Until they are unburied.
31
Mrgluer Mar 27, 2026 +19
no, the stat is that there’s a 90% drop in launch rates. surprise surprise, they don’t need to blow up all the missiles, they can just blow up the stuff that shoots the missiles and you’ve effectively made them worthless.
19
Zipz Mar 27, 2026 +4
Jesus Christ It’s honestly wild how far I had to go to get someone that actually uses logic here
4
Mrgluer Mar 28, 2026 +2
dude the amount of bots in all politic subs is cancer. look at the amount of fresh accounts that only speak of one or two conflicts, they’re always couple months old.
2
Meowser02 Mar 27, 2026 +7
The missile launchers, not the missiles themselves
7
stickdutra Mar 27, 2026 +155
so is less than a third, got it
155
supercyberlurker Mar 27, 2026 +69
That's where us credibility is now because of Trump. I just assume the lies are as lying as possible.
69
whatlineisitanyway Mar 27, 2026 +31
When the world is more likely to believe what Iran tells them than the US government you realize how little influence the US now has. Their soft power is near zero. They can only count on their military might and this war could easily expose that.
31
___xXx__xXx__xXx__ Mar 27, 2026 +8
Kind of has already. "Guys, we've got a round hole here!" US runs in all eager to brag about having the best square peg in the world.
8
mschuster91 Mar 27, 2026 +6
>They can only count on their military might and this war could easily expose that. That the US has limp d*** syndrome when it comes to fighting wars, now that has been exposed ever since Iraq. A bunch of former camel riders armed with Kalashnikovs in shitty Soviet era tanks, that shouldn't have taken 8 years. The US is still the top dog when it comes to any war involving superpowers due to its nuclear arsenal. But that's about it.
6
Beautiful-Tackle8969 Mar 27, 2026 +4
Successfully fighting an entrenched insurgency is extremely difficult if not impossible when your military is thousands of miles from home and the enemy is well organized and determined. It’s hugely expensive to fly in weapons, supplies, and fresh troops. Meanwhile the enemy has the home advantage. They know all the places to hide, they can stealthily place IEDs and stage ambushes. They can pick off your men one by one and then blend back into the civilian population. They have a lot of civilians on their side as scouts, supplying food, hiding weapons, etc. A military trained in battlefield tactics, be it the US or any other power, is not going to be effective in this type of conflict.
4
Reno_valetore Mar 27, 2026 +2
I think they might also realise, they can't count on their military might either
2
affordableproctology Mar 27, 2026 +4
I used to think the USA were liars in a diabolically proficient sort of way like CIA backed coups and international espionage. Now I just think it's full of incompetent bafoons fat with wealth and greed. It's almost like the paper tiger era of the soviet union.
4
JaVelin-X- Mar 27, 2026 +10
it's only a third of what they think they know about
10
BritishAnimator Mar 27, 2026 +5
All Completely Obliterated....some of it.
5
pmormr Mar 27, 2026 +4
100% of the weapons we obliterated were obliterated though, so it rounds up.
4
Objective_Mousse7216 Mar 27, 2026 +3
Probably more like 5%
3
Old_Ladies Mar 27, 2026 +2
Not like they won't be making more constantly. You will know when Iran runs out of their stockpile when they go weeks to months without firing any till they built up some more to make a volley.
2
steelcryo Mar 27, 2026 +11
They're probably also counting all the missiles that exploded hitting a target in that number knowing this administration
11
jpiro Mar 27, 2026 +10
~~Total~~ Partial Obliteration!
10
Weird_Priority_9119 Mar 27, 2026 +12
How many of those missiles were destroyed when they hit their targets?
12
punishhhher Mar 27, 2026 +38
The intelligence stands in contrast to President Donald Trump's public remarks on Thursday that Iran had "very few rockets left". He also appeared to acknowledge the threat from ​remaining Iranian missiles and drones to any future U.S. operations to safeguard the economically vital Strait of Hormuz. Reuters has reported that he is weighing whether to escalate the conflict by ⁠deploying U.S. troops to Iranian shores along the Strait.
38
BritishAnimator Mar 27, 2026 +18
He will do boots on the ground, several times so you don't notice it happening. Diplomacy or apologising are not this administration's strong points. Running away is another possibility but then the average American's life will become a lot riskier for the forseable future.
18
likeahurricane Mar 27, 2026 +9
It's so f****** painful to watch - Iran has all the cards on negotiating as it controls the strait. Trump will never agree to their demands. So the really "smart" people in the administration are going to tell him, "A limited incursion into coastal areas will degrade their ability to control the strait." And then the Shahed drone launches will move just a bit inward, and we'll follow...and then...
9
GuelphEastEndGhetto Mar 27, 2026 +6
To the mountains they will go. Ask Russia what the mountains were like in Afghanistan. Side note: Just read a summary of Russia’s attempt to control Afghanistan and the storyline is quite similar. Went on for 10 years before Russia turned around and went back home. Ten years….
6
jimicus Mar 27, 2026 +7
But even if Trump was telling the truth, what's he done to Iran's supply lines? Because I don't imagine they'd be sitting there saying "Ah well. Looks like we have very few rockets left and we're now sitting ducks.".
7
HP844182 Mar 27, 2026 +4
They've been attacking their military industry base which will make it harder to rebuild their stock
4
SenorPinchy Mar 27, 2026 +5
And they still have like 80,000 shahed drones. And they one need ONE to keep the straight closed. Welcome to asymmetric warfare 101.
5
jqman69 Mar 27, 2026 +33
Destroyed is a weird word for launched
33
CaptainCanuck93 Mar 27, 2026 +19
"We bravely destroyed the incoming missiles with our Anti-Missile Liquified Natural Gas Terminals."
19
sloowhand Mar 27, 2026 +7
I’ll win this fight by letting him hit me in the face so many times that he gets tired and can’t fight back anymore.
7
lyonellaughingstorm Mar 27, 2026 +2
Ahh, the Homer Simpson strategy. Too bad Iran is turning out to be Drederick Tatum
2
wrldruler21 Mar 27, 2026 +5
I mean, putting your enemy under seige and encouraging then to shoot all of their ammunition, is a valid military strategy.
5
Pjpjpjpjpj Mar 27, 2026 +4
Yes, clearly “we obliterated 90% of their missile capability” means the US employed the valid military strategy of provoking Iran to launch 30% of their missiles of which about 1/5th hit their targets.  And now shall we also discuss how much of America’s missile inventory has been depleted in Iran’s “valid military strategy.” Oh look: “In the first 16 days, the U.S. used over 6,000 defensive and offensive munitions, according to estimates from the Payne Institute for Public Policy. That includes nearly 46% of ATACMS and Precision Strike Missiles and nearly 40% of U.S.-operated THAAD interceptors. The Payne Institute also estimates the U.S. would deplete its stockpiles of those three munitions within a month at that rate.” So the US used 40-46% to get Iran to use 30%. Strategy validated! Trump is giving time for Iran to capitulate because the US doesn’t have the weapons to continue the current strategy. He has his fingers crossed, but is positioning for the next escalation - US troops on the ground invading a country of 93m people… 27% the size of the entire US. 
4
Own-Secret2028 Mar 27, 2026 +2
Even RUSI estimates conservatively that the US will be bone dry in around 2 months, and these are allies using the numbers *we've* supplied. 
2
pluismans Mar 27, 2026 +2
Missiles generally destroy themselves in impact. Technically correct is the best kind of correct!
2
unl1988 Mar 27, 2026 +3
missiles don't matter. tanks don't matter. planes don't matter. soldiers don't matter. It is Iran's asymmetrical capabilities that matter. Just ask the 46 year old frat boy in charge of the FBI. drones, cyber attacks, IEDs, that is what matters.
3
CountryFriedSteak78 Mar 28, 2026 +3
It’s becoming clear that they don’t know shit about f*** right now.
3
Philo_Publius1776 Mar 27, 2026 +21
The US isn't targeting the missiles. They're targeting the launchers. They had ~100 launchers at the start of the war and the US has destroyed ~80 of them. The missiles don't matter once the launchers are taken out.
21
Bishopjones2112 Mar 27, 2026 +16
Not sure where your data comes from but the current holding is about 100-200 launchers. Which is still dramatically lower than what they had before this war started but they have more than the 20 you are saying. You are right to a point though once the launchers are gone they will have to take the warheads from remaining missiles and use the explosives for the shorter range/slower drones.
16
Philo_Publius1776 Mar 27, 2026 +5
The press briefing from the CENTCOM general overseeing the operation is the source.
5
lordaddament Mar 27, 2026 +2
But launchers are the cheapest things to mass produce though
2
Drenlin Mar 27, 2026 +5
They're mostly SCUD-family launchers though. Those are c**** and plentiful elsewhere in the world. Edit: They're also not that hard to improvise. We learned that in Iraq already. They were building SCUD launchers out of semi trailers.
5
Philo_Publius1776 Mar 27, 2026 +12
They're really not. They are c****, but they aren't plentiful and they're not easy to make. Iran lacks the capacity to build them at all at the moment.
12
Drenlin Mar 27, 2026 +4
Why do you say that? They managed to get the Houthis producing them while fighting both halves of the Saudi coalition and al-Qaeda, and Yemen has *far* less operational industrial capacity than Iran. The only really complicated part of a SCUD launcher is the guidance system and those are pretty easy to make in this day and age. The rest isn't much more complicated than some amalgamation of a dump truck and a tanker. Just a big cradle on a hydraulic ram with fuel transfer lines integrated somewhere.
4
Philo_Publius1776 Mar 27, 2026 +2
No they didn't...you seem to have some confused ideas about SCUDs.
2
Drenlin Mar 27, 2026 +4
Care to elaborate? Most of Iran's SCUD variants use MELs where the working bits are basically just bolted to a heavy flatbed trailer. They're not overly complicated devices, all things considered.
4
Philo_Publius1776 Mar 27, 2026 +3
They're complicated enough that Iran has not been able toe meaningfully produce more, despite efforts at trying.
3
mmoore327 Mar 27, 2026 +4
Those would be the ones they fired already?
4
IntelArtiGen Mar 27, 2026 +7
It doesn't help a lot if we don't have the real numbers. US+Israel both target these missiles. They destroyed some of them. Some of them have been used. How many are left? 100? 500? 1000? I guess it's at least >100~200.
7
mhornberger Mar 27, 2026 +17
We can track launches, and those have fallen off precipitously. Though of course some will fall back on the idea that, despite them being bombed constantly, they're holding the missiles back for when they *really* get serious about attacking other countries. Similar to how Russia was said to be holding back the "good stuff" for later.
17
DeepLibrarian7247 Mar 27, 2026 +8
I'm not sure either that Iran is holding back the big stuff. But te comparison with Russia is not the right one, because Russia did commit his best troops believing they were going to win easily (exactly what the US do when they go in). Iran is the underdog here. And a valid strategy is holding back the good stuff to deplete AA defenses. It's been a couple of years we all know the USA and his allies have issues with stocks. So if we know, Iran who's preparing for exactly what's happening, may have been prepared for the rodeo.
8
IntelArtiGen Mar 27, 2026 +5
> we can track launches, and those have fallen off precipitously. True but all numbers aren't consistent. If they intercept 90% and they get 2 hits / day, it means Iran is able to send 20/day, and if they do that for 10 days, it means they still had 200 missiles left. I guess they're probably intercepting ~50% of iranian missiles and Iran probably still has hundreds of missiles left.
5
mhornberger Mar 27, 2026 +4
I said we can track *launches*. I didn't limit that to those missiles that got through. I know Iran doesn't have *zero* missiles left. And I don't know how many they do have left, but if they were flush, would they be increasingly parsimonious with launches?
4
Shinobismaster Mar 27, 2026 +2
I’m pretty sure the limiting factor for Iran right now is the launchers themselves. Having a large stockpile of missiles doesn’t do much if there are no launchers to use them
2
Surfer_Rick Mar 27, 2026 +2
They have over 80,000 drones and over 3,000 ballistic missiles.  So, a LOT are left. 
2
SporksInjected Mar 27, 2026 +2
Those generally only work against stationary targets and are fairly easy to shoot down. There are videos of Ukrainians taking them down with machine guns.
2
Raspberries-Are-Evil Mar 27, 2026 +2
Embarrassing aa f*** with a liar President.
2
Endscrypt Mar 27, 2026 +2
That’s not what Trump says I wonder who’s telling lies. …No I don’t it’s Trump he lied 🤥
2
blastmemer Mar 27, 2026 +2
“The assessment, which has not been previously reported, shows that **while most of Iran's missiles are either destroyed or inaccessible**, Tehran still has a significant missile inventory and may be able to recover some buried or damaged missiles once fighting stops.” So splitting hairs. Most are either destroyed have been hit and are buried.
2
CMGCookie Mar 27, 2026 +2
$1 billion a day...and this is what they got. But don't worry folks. Your gas bill will keep going up.
2
Ok-Boot-8106 Mar 27, 2026 +2
It's crazy their entire Navy has been destroyed 2 weeks ago , yet the number of ships destroyed goes up every day , think its up to 150ships , next week itll be 160
2
LMurch13 Mar 27, 2026 +2
Its amazing to see the US struggle without NATO. Maybe we shouldn't have betrayed our allies. 🤷
2
Small-Percentage-181 Mar 27, 2026 +2
You know they sent all the shit missiles first to use up the interceptors. Iran isn't Afghanistan or Iraq they are highly educated hence their nuclear,drone and missile programs this country has been under sanctions for decades but still exports drones and supports multiple militia, Iran is a regional super power even under sanctions, America is treating them like a 3rd world nation that will roll over after a few bombs, the bombing will do nothing but unite Iran.
2
ndc4051 Mar 27, 2026 +2
I would not be at all surprised if even a third is an exaggeration they will later walk back. Knowledgeable people who have slipped up and let the truth out have said they have no idea how many missiles Iran has because they have spent decades building networks underground to conceal and them and allow them to be moved quickly at a moments notice. Not to mention Iran is one the world leaders in ultra high performance concrete they use to build these underground bunkers and networks, making them much harder for our bombs to penetrate. For all we know, they could have a massive arsenal of missiles safely tucked away in a bunker under some mountain. They don't leave their equipment out in the open for us to count. When you don't have air superiority and you know your enemy has sophisticated spy satellites, why would you?
2
starfire10K Mar 27, 2026 +2
Rubio told us Iran make 100 missiles per month and they had over two decades to prepare. Iran have already launched 3500-4000 missiles since start of the war. Obviously initial official IDF assessment of 2,500 ballistic missiles, was completely wrong: https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/idf-assesses-iran-has-some-2500-ballistic-missiles-was-accelerating-production/ If that third is roughly 3,500–4,000 missiles, the total starting count had to be at least 10,500–12,000.
2
thejoshimitsu Mar 28, 2026 +2
Lol. This is optimistic reporting too. I bet you that it's not even a third of their missile arsenal deployed. The yanks couldn't win in Vietnam, they couldn't win in Afghanistan. What the f*** makes them think they can win in Iran? They won't even be able to establish a military foothold in the country. No American boots will touch Iranian soil. Admire defeat and just leave Iran and the rest of the middle east alone ffs.
2
manniesalado Mar 28, 2026 +2
Don't worry. Russia, China and India will have the stocks topped up soon.
2
xmuskorx Mar 28, 2026 +2
yeah, but what % of launchers
2
Fast_past3600 Mar 27, 2026 +5
I'm not defending Trump, but what is being said here is not logically inconsistent: Iran may have throngs of missiles, but what Iran and the U.S. have done is attack the launchers and hammer the control systems. If people bothered to read: >Israeli military officials say Iran had 2,500 ballistic missiles capable of reaching Israel before the war. Over 335 missile launchers have been "neutralized", representing 70% of Iran's launch capacity, a senior Israeli military official said. What is happening here is that Iran has missiles but fewer ways to transport missiles to the launchers; many of the launchers left are old and in disrepair; the command and control systems have been wiped out and the people giving commands and orders within the IRGC are dead. So yeah, they may have 67% of their original missile inventory left; but, do they have any way to launch them? And if so, is anyone alive to give the orders? Does anyone on Listnook read the actual articles anymore?
5
Disastrous_Ant5657 Mar 27, 2026 +4
I don't even believe those numbers. The actual amount is way lower.
4
SHUT_DOWN_EVERYTHING Mar 27, 2026 +3
Mission Accomplished… in progress.
3
Economy_Field9111 Mar 27, 2026 +3
The idea that we have reliable estimates of their real capabilities at this point seems pretty laughable to me. We obviously don't know what's actually happening. Pretty much *nobody*. Most effective media apparatus in human history counts for nothing because all it does is distort, distract, and deny.
3
DeepLibrarian7247 Mar 27, 2026 +5
Israel seems to have been able to infiltrate Iran power structure really deep. They probably know everything about everything. Now, are they sharing all the information or are they keeping some information from their allies...?
5
SourceUnusual2479 Mar 27, 2026 +3
It’s Trump this is what he does. He will completely lie, bypass the constitution, then throw his own people under the bus and blame anyone and everything else. And it will work. And then he will do something even more stupid and we will all forget and move on. He’s a child whose parents (Congress, Senate, SCOUTUS) just spoil him with everything he wants and never enforce the rules
3
This-Grape-5149 Mar 27, 2026 +4
We will need a full blown crisis to remove him and even then I’m not sure it’ll be enough. Really need something bad to happen to the elite. Only thing I can think of is a stock market implosion
4
Boys4Ever Mar 27, 2026 +2
Can’t we just declare victory and claim Iran begged for their lives so our insecure can get back to padding their wallets and spare our sons and daughters from their sins?
2
Hacym Mar 27, 2026 +3
Mission accomplished. 
3
arvigeus Mar 27, 2026 +2
Translation: Iran would have to replenish only ~33% of its missiles, courtesy to Russia, China, and allies.
2
IKillZombies4Cash Mar 27, 2026 +1
so 25%.
1
RLewis8888 Mar 27, 2026 +1
My faith in any information coming out of this administration is triple-obliterated.
1
Tex1931 Mar 27, 2026 +1
About a third of what they don’t know
1
JLRfan Mar 27, 2026 +1
Recall, too, that US/Israeli intelligence does not have a complete picture of launch capacity: [https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2026/03/11/us-cannot-locate-irans-missile-launchers/](https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2026/03/11/us-cannot-locate-irans-missile-launchers/)
1
Gentle_method Mar 27, 2026 +1
Paywall. I feel like articles like these are stupid because they enforce commenting without reading anything.
1
regaphysics Mar 27, 2026 +1
I believe the goal has always been destroying the launchers, not the missiles. I’d like to know what % of launchers remain.
1
Ranger30 Mar 27, 2026 +1
Obliterated? He keeps using that word I don’t think it means what he thinks it means
1
Vkardash Mar 27, 2026 +1
If "official" sources are saying about the third. Just know they're lying. Nothing this administration says is true. Literally nothing!
1
providencetoday Mar 27, 2026 +1
Don’t worry. Pete is a top mind. Top.
1
Tobias---Funke Mar 27, 2026 +1
So 5% then!
1
tazztsim Mar 27, 2026 +1
So if they “confirm” 33% it’s likely under 10%
1
kaewan Mar 27, 2026 +1
How many "confirmed" were actually just decoys?
1
Vegetable-Hold9182 Mar 27, 2026 +1
Probably even less
1
Oograr Mar 27, 2026 +1
Mission Complete-ish
1
DriveShaftBassPlayer Mar 27, 2026 +1
60% of the time, every time 
1
Samusen Mar 27, 2026 +1
Totally completely absolutely insanely 100% clearly nearly soon maybe almost potentially eventually over
1
Broken_chairs Mar 27, 2026 +1
2/3 being held in anticipation of boots on the strait of hormuz
1
apexxin Mar 27, 2026 +1
And you know they are counting the ones that blew our shit up in that third.
1
yagonnawanna Mar 27, 2026 +1
This just means they have no f****** idea
1
China_bot42069 Mar 27, 2026 +1
Can anyone tell me the last the us won a war? 
1
shanty-daze Mar 27, 2026 +1
How many have been destroyed as a result of them being fired at and striking targets in other countries?
1
SC_W33DKILL3R Mar 27, 2026 +1
Destroyed by the US or destroyed hitting Israel and neighbouring countries?
1
wijm02 Mar 27, 2026 +1
I thought it was 100%?
1
TyblosiinU Mar 27, 2026 +1
"The status of around another third is less clear but bombings likely damaged, destroyed or buried those missiles in underground tunnels and ‌bunkers, four of the sources said. The sources spoke on condition of anonymity given the sensitive nature of the information." Jeez people at least read the first two paragraphs of an article before commenting. Iran losing potential up to two thirds of their missiles in only one month of fighting is not great for them especially because their losing the ability to replace them.
1
526mb Mar 27, 2026 +1
My bet is they’re saving them if the US attempts to land ground troops. As soon as they put American boots on the ground they are going to let those things loose on every piece of energy infrastructure in the region.
1
Braklinath Mar 27, 2026 +1
If it's only a third... and they're scrambling to focus interceptors. Thats not good lmao. So much for "rebuilding the militaty" with a 1 trillion f****** dollar budget. How much did ya skim off the top? The whole f****** thing or what?
1
jsar16 Mar 27, 2026 +1
All but wiped out huh.
1
PurpleCoat6656 Mar 27, 2026 +1
100% of these people's brains are smoothe Af
1
DeepLibrarian7247 Mar 27, 2026 +1
So, he couldn't have support in CENTCOM before he started the purge? You really have somme difficulties to connect those 2 braincells...
1
44Stryker44 Mar 27, 2026 +1
With another 1/3 believed no longer usable and not factoring in the number launched
1
exoriparian Mar 27, 2026 +1
Babe, wake up! New lie just dropped!
1
SupaCrzySgt Mar 27, 2026 +1
Scott Steiner math
1
ezagreb Mar 27, 2026 +1
Well how many have been used already?
1
FauxReal Mar 27, 2026 +1
According to the White House this article is fake news. But so is the apparent justification of the current Iran war. [https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/2025/06/irans-nuclear-facilities-have-been-obliterated-and-suggestions-otherwise-are-fake-news](https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/2025/06/irans-nuclear-facilities-have-been-obliterated-and-suggestions-otherwise-are-fake-news)
1
hudimudi Mar 27, 2026 +1
Wondering how much of that the US actually destroyed, and how many aren’t existing anymore bcs they were launched. Reality could be even more grim than this.
1
CharredWelderGuy Mar 27, 2026 +1
Missiles huh? Even if accurate, most damage is being done by their drones, not Missiles.
1
Axin_Saxon Mar 27, 2026 +1
You know when Donald said that they decimated the Iranian stock pile, I thought he was being overdramatic as usual, but it turns out he was just being historically accurate.
1
Ne02126 Mar 27, 2026 +1
Are the missiles that are being used counted towards the total? Are they trying to say, "if Iran fires 10% of their missiles at Israel and US targets, then their stockpile has been decimated"? Bunch of idiots.
1
Lantzypantzz Mar 27, 2026 +1
If they said 100% then they wouldn't have a reason to invade claiming Iran still has wmds. Anyone starting to see how familiar this all is?
1
← Back to Board