Saw the funniest comment on Twitter describing this: "Don Zu: Break an enemy blockade by blockading their blockade."
1091
Elburro12915 hr ago
+203
Oh awesome!!! I’ve been collecting these!! Thank you!!
Book of don tzu
"Tariff, belittle and threaten to invade your allies. Nothing bad can happen, it can only good happen." - Don Tzu.
"If you don't know what you're doing, neither will your enemy."
• Don Tzu
"Surprise your enemies by backstabbing your allies"
-Don Tzu
"Surprise your allies by befriending your enemies."
-Don Tzu
"To command attention in a crowded room, shit yourself."
-Don Tzu
"promise a plan in 2-3 weeks, in 2-3 weeks deliver nothing"
-Don Tzu
"If you find yourself in a deep hole, keep digging but make sure you do it with the most expensive shovel available."
~ Don Tzu
"Don't try to understand war, economy, or diplomacy, for this is an impossible task. It's all computer." - Don Tzu
"Break an enemy blockade by blockading their blockade." - Don Tzu
203
Vencer_wrightmage14 hr ago
+55
>"Surprise your enemies by backstabbing your allies -Don Tzu
>"Surprise your allies by befriending your enemies." -Don Tzu
This is some Ferengi Rule 34/35 of Acquisition level kind of stuff.
55
Practical-Object929813 hr ago
+14
15- War is good for business
16- Peace is good for business.
14
Professor_Eindackel14 hr ago
+34
The Shart of War
34
ReallyBrainDead13 hr ago
+30
"The greatest victories are the ones you completely make up." - Don Tzu
30
tekniklee13 hr ago
+5
When Dow above 50k you become infallible
5
Elburro12912 hr ago
+3
Ohhh I’m adding this one to the list!!
3
Mr_Engineering13 hr ago
+6
>"promise a plan in 2-3 weeks, in 2-3 weeks deliver nothing"
Promise a plan in 2-3 weeks, in 2-3 weeks promise a plan in 2-3 weeks
6
IBM29615 hr ago
+219
Sun Tzu probably rolling around in his grave lol
219
InformationHorder15 hr ago
+241
If anybody has ever wondered why the likes of Sun Tzu and Clausewitz got so popular for writing down the blatantly obvious, this conflict is the answer to that question.
241
jimicus15 hr ago
+195
Sun Tzu's work is surprisingly readable - the English translation is only about 70 pages (and about 500 pages of footnotes explaining the translation).
Most of it boils down to:
1. Try not to fight a war in the first place.
2. But if you must fight a war, keep it short.
3. Make sure you understand your enemies strengths and weaknesses.
4. Don't skimp on the planning and preparation. This is the difference between success and failure. (Anyone who's ever played any sort of strategy game could have told you this).
5. Don't get yourself into a situation you can't get out of. Don't put your enemy into a situation he can't get out of.
Sun Tzu particularly hated sieges.
195
CrasseMaximum15 hr ago
+66
Yeah unfortunatly Donny does not read
66
PieTighter15 hr ago
+39
Neither does Kegsbreath.
39
TasteIllustrious758514 hr ago
+6
That's kind of a scary thing 😭, they hit a boat the United States is going all in and Iran will suffer even more.
6
MelangeBot13 hr ago
+4
The only man in the history of history who has "written" more books than he has read.
4
epanek15 hr ago
+39
5 Agreed. Allow the enemy a way to surrender with some honor left.
39
ii_Narwhal14 hr ago
+20
Yep, so much easier to continue to fight when you feel there is nothing left to gain by surrender, the way Trump is handing this it's like he literally has to do the opposite of whatever is the right thing in any given moment.
20
Crafty_Quantity_316213 hr ago
+22
In the Wheel of Time series, a character, Mat, says:
"*Always leave a way out, unless you really want to find out how hard a man can fight when he’s nothing to lose*.” - The Fires of Heaven
22
CliftonForce13 hr ago
+9
Seems to be why the negotiations failed. The US team strode in there like gods who were there to accept Iran's surrender while humiliating them as much as possible.
9
inconspiciousdude8 hr ago
+2
It also was just a ruse. They even sent destroyers to the strait during the negotiations to make sure they know it's a ruse. They don't want it to stop.
2
VossC2H6O14 hr ago
+4
Surprising Starcraft and other RTS games teaches you a lot about planning and understanding limitations.
4
ForwardHuckleberry2612 hr ago
+3
Seems like Trump screwed up on all 5 points
3
Curious-Look604214 hr ago
+2
If only Jiri reminded himself of these last night
2
AK_Panda14 hr ago
+14
For real. So much of Sun Tzu seems like common sense when you read it, but then you see shit like this.
14
EstablishmentFull79713 hr ago
+8
Von Clausewitz says: Everything is very simple in war, but the simplest thing is difficult.
8
LearningT0Fly15 hr ago
+33
Very Roman of them. How to deal with an enemy’s walls? Build walls around their walls.
33
AK_Panda14 hr ago
+13
That did work in a lot of situations. No one expects the double siege.
This more like if someone captured all your food supplies and you just went "Haha, jokes on you, I didn't want them anyway, now I'm building a wall around you and the food"
13
EternalNewCarSmell15 hr ago
+11
tbf if you really dig into the details the Western Roman Empire was by far the most American thing ever until like the 1950s.
11
mdevi9415 hr ago
+3
USA about to enter their empire phase
3
Short_Switch_180715 hr ago
+18
Trump's fat ass would fall into the Rubicon
18
Flower_Murderer15 hr ago
+5
Cesar phase or post Hadreon?
5
Alt4rEg015 hr ago
+5
Caligula
5
Identita_Nascosta15 hr ago
+7
Nero?
7
history_is_my_crack14 hr ago
+2
People falling for 1st century Patrician propaganda to this day....
2
YeetedApple15 hr ago
+5
Enter?
5
StephenHunterUK15 hr ago
+7
The British in both world wars did actually blockade Germany. There's just not as many movies made about our submarine operations, [although I have seen this one.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/We_Dive_at_Dawn)
7
accforme15 hr ago
+21
Wasn't that how the Battle of Alesia took place?
Maybe those more familiar with antiquity can shed light.
21
Stop_Doomscrolling15 hr ago
+15
Calling Alesia antiquity makes me feel old somehow.
15
claimstoknowpeople15 hr ago
+7
feels like it was just yesterday
7
Baneofarius15 hr ago
+4
Yes, but that was because a larger Gaulish force was on the way to reinforce and it would have been more dangerous for the gaulish forces to meet up or for the Romans to be flanked while besieging.
4
Wartz15 hr ago
+9
I mean, this actually is technically a sounder strategy than their current / recent ideas
9
Time-Weekend-861115 hr ago
+4
The point is that shipping vessels from Iran's allies could pass through. Now they can't.
4
rich84easy14 hr ago
+5
While you think your statement is funny, logically it’s not correct, he is blocking them from earning money by charging the ship and letting them pass. Not that I support it, but listnook tends your avoid thinking logically.
5
Paraparo15 hr ago
+15
In fairness, if it's going to be a game of blockade chicken, this is how it's to be played. The selective passage of boats to Iran's allies was going to be a big lifeline and point of leverage. It's Iran's strongest card, it wasn't going to be overlooked.
Iran has explicitly used a tactic of attacking US aligned interests in a play to exert third party pressure on the US. Likewise, this is more or less the same in reverse. And there is a nonzero chance if boats are stopped those allies who are heavily dependant on Iranian oil are keener to lean on Iran than fight the US on the matter.
15
jpharber15 hr ago
+18
I agree. Out of all the stupid aspects of the war, the blockade of a (selective) blockade is one of the less stupid things about it. Despite how utterly stupid it sounds at first.
18
jimicus15 hr ago
+4
Considering that up until now, all we've heard from the US is nonsensical "We'll destroy the whole country!" remarks from Trump, I wonder if some adults in the military have finally had a chance to have their say.
4
Special_Watch872513 hr ago
+5
Yeah, it’s more the kind of action that makes sense tactically but really highlights just how stupid the entire conflict is.
The thing is … isn’t enforcing this blockade going to force the US Navy to uh commit what amounts to acts of war against third party countries?
5
wheniaminspaced12 hr ago
+3
Not really? These have been historically viewed as somewhat acceptable if conducted in a certain way. I.e. you dont blow up the ships.
Iran's destruction of civilian vessels parked in other countries waters is technically more problematic and didn't provoke much of an international response.
The only real wild card here would be China, they could choose to involve themselves directly and test the blockade militarily, but their navy isnt properly equipped to really do so. The trade actions they could take would hurt the US but do similar levels of damage domestically.
Overall this will be viewed internationally as much more acceptable than the war itself.
3
Averagelytalldude12 hr ago
+2
Ideally no one tests the US blockade. Just like they don’t test the Iranians.
2
Phase3Investor15 hr ago
+38
So with a blockade we have:
1- Prolonged strait closure
2- Reduced amount of oil in the market
3- Raised oil and gas prices
Genius
38
Sieve-Boy15 hr ago
+7
4- less fertiliser for the world.
You want government breaking riots, start with hungry people
7
Cream_Stay_Frothy15 hr ago
+4
I think there’s a probability that it puts Irans allies pressure on Iran, but if there were a time in US history that this strategy had the lowest probability of working, it’d be right now. Considering Trump’s global tariff policy, threatening longstanding allies, and his decisions to generally do the exact *opposite* of good will diplomacy as long as he has been in office.
He has eaten up so much of the worlds patience, and shown that the US will act with a complete disregard for any norms, treaties, or promises made (unless that country rhymes with *Schmisrael*). Other nations likely realize there’s a fairly high chance *even if* they can force Iran to open the Strait, there is no guarantee that Trump will re-open it himself, or decide to run it himself like a mob boss.
The people who are “Irans allies” are effectively China…. The rest are US “allies” who aren’t going to have a Ton of pull when it comes to getting Iran to capitulate.
Honestly- I won’t be surprised if we see China (or other affected US ally countries) begin to sell off massive amounts of US treasury bonds in response, which basically puts the pressure back on the US via the absolute shit show that creates in the US economy…
4
rmslashusr15 hr ago
+10
The Indian navy has been escorting their ship. Are we going to attack them if they refuse to be boarded? This is in India’s backyard and they have nuclear weapons and a modern navy including nuclear powered ballistic missile submarines. I can’t imagine them allowing their ships to be boarded.
10
HalfADozenOfAnother15 hr ago
+7
Since Centcom has actually confirmed the blockade I have to believe they know through whatever backchannel negotiations that India and China won't run the blockade.
7
unknownpoltroon12 hr ago
+2
\>I have to believe they know through whatever backchannel negotiations that India and China won't run the blockade.
That would be the expectation with any minimally competent or sane administration and leadership. We have neither.
And why would china not want an excuse to blockade Taiwan?
2
justinballsonya15 hr ago
+4
India will not run the blockade lol China would be the only one and with how precarious their economy is currently I doubt they do it either
4
morbob15 hr ago
+2
Some ships are going to start sinking and we are going to have a major oil spill, just give it time.
2
Fteven14 hr ago
+2
Sun Set
2
Stand_Up_381314 hr ago
+44
Last night trump said the blockade is in effect immediately. Now this. Tuesday, after his insiders buy oil puts or short positions, he’ll announce there is no plan for a blockade.
44
keep_it_irie15 hr ago
+205
Oh god he's going to try to rename it to the Strait of Trump, isn't he.
205
kiwiinNY15 hr ago
+98
He already floated that. Yup, he did.
98
ninja-badger115 hr ago
+31
Source?? Surely not
31
TakeTheThirdStep14 hr ago
+99
https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/27/trump-strait-of-hormuz-iran-war.html
And don't call me Shirley.
99
Muritavo14 hr ago
+17
Mt god... he says things and the contradicts in the same sentence... It's unbelievable...
17
MelangeBot13 hr ago
+10
it's part of flooding the zone
10
Northern_Ice_25019 hr ago
+3
No, that one is "the weave".
3
1877KlownsForKids14 hr ago
+16
You know he did.
https://nypost.com/2026/03/27/us-news/trump-considers-renaming-strait-of-hormuz-after-either-america-or-himself-once-he-evicts-iran/
16
Kendrome14 hr ago
+8
It's scary that it's almost believable.
8
Westbrooks3ptShot14 hr ago
+19
He literally did say it this morning.
19
Kendrome14 hr ago
+5
Gah, he is just the most (can't thing of a word to fully encompass him) person in the world.
5
Westbrooks3ptShot14 hr ago
+4
He said it this morning on a Fox News interview
4
Prohydration14 hr ago
+3
Trump trying too hard to remind everyone he's strait.
3
Thirdnipple7915 hr ago
+55
Let me guess. Extend deadline to Tuesday. Then taco.
55
actuallyapossom14 hr ago
+5
We're potentially getting a "two more weeks" on the negotiations front then too.
5
AdeptRisk68615 hr ago
+236
DO SOMETHING CONGRESS, YOU F****** PUSSIES
236
zombiekoalas15 hr ago
+65
Majority of republicans approve of trumps handling of the war. At least as of the 25th.
https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2026/03/25/americans-broadly-disapprove-of-u-s-military-action-in-iran/
Republican senators and house reps are dutifully representing their republican constituents.
65
gogreengolions13 hr ago
+25
Funny, in 2023, 47% republicans thought it was best to “play an active role in foreign affairs” as opposed to 53% wanting to “staying out”.
Now, 71% of republicans say the US made the right decision with this military action.
A truly brainwashed lot.
https://globalaffairs.org/research/public-opinion-survey/americas-foreign-policy-future-public-opinion-and-2024-election
25
sask35715 hr ago
+55
Congress have sat back and watched this develop. They have apparently decided that this erratic display of American exceptionalism and disregard for the rest of the world is what Americans want. Just as they did nothing about plans to take Greenland by force or annex Canada so they will do nothing about blockading the Strait of Hormuz.
55
Green-Discussion612815 hr ago
+16
My theory is half of them have dirt related to Epstein and some other shit, if potus goes down he will take them with him. It’s like a big circle jerk and we’re not in it.
16
redyellowblue503115 hr ago
+41
Republicans are more than ok with this, clearly.
41
Tree1Dva15 hr ago
+8
It's not even that, it's just that too many of them are too spineless to ever vote against dear leader
8
p3t3y515 hr ago
+8
Why, only 30% of Americans did anything to try to stop this child from being President. Congress are just doing what the people wanted.
8
Kataphractoi9 hr ago
+4
You expect Republicans, who control Congress, to stand up to Trump? Rofl.
4
Arkayb3314 hr ago
+8
This is why a 2 party system is the antithesis of democracy and progress.
8
bratleh15 hr ago
+8
They have a recess coming up in August, so if they start working now that could inconvenience them! Don’t you plebs ever think about their vacations! /s
8
Tsakax15 hr ago
+11
Aren't they on a 2 week recess right now f****** laziest people in america.
11
Awkward_Silence-14 hr ago
+2
That's the tricky part. Trump has dug the hole so deep there's no just backing out and going home anymore.
You can muzzle or even remove Trump from office but that hardly meets any of Iran's demands to resolve this. Some of which still seem to be non starters for the most of US political spectrum
2
Threecatproblem14 hr ago
+4
Stop using the generic term "congress"! It's the Talipublicans that are allowing this to happen while sitting on their hands. Democrats have been beating the drum and doing what they can, but when one party controls all branches of government and something really bad happens, don't try to throw the blame blanket on Democrats!
4
PapaTahm15 hr ago
+275
In the tinniest chance this isn't market manipulation,
Which everyone knows it clearly is.
Does U.S government even understand the consequences of doing this?
Like has anyone even warn them the possibility of Iran Blocking the Bab El-Mandeb Strait as well and of China doing not only Economical Retaliation but also intervening with this war?
Like they can't be this dumb, there's gotta be someone who know geography and geopolitics left in that room.
275
Content-Inspector99315 hr ago
+319
"Like they can't be this dumb"
oh, yes they can be
319
Nintendoh_6415 hr ago
+74
Not can. *Are*.
74
Kagari199815 hr ago
+25
They arent dumb, the cronies are actively profiting through all the shenanigans he put the world through.
The only dumb people here are the average joe who voted them into power.
25
Content-Inspector99315 hr ago
+25
I think it's both. They seemed to genuinely not expect Iran to respond this way and even with the tariffs, they seemed truly shocked that countries might retaliate with their own tariffs. They are corrupt and stupid.
25
FukushimaBlinkie15 hr ago
+6
Well don't forget about the core of people who think this war is going to bring about the return of Jesus and their pathway to heaven
6
Gecks77715 hr ago
+51
Rubio and Vance are probably the best they have. Most of the cabinet is made up of media people now.
After the military purges, probably even the military people reporting to the cabinet are yes-men (or at least keep-your-mouth-shut-and-follow-orders men).
51
DaLurker8715 hr ago
+16
How can you say they can't be that dumb after all of this? He seriously never had a single plan for how he was going to handle the straight of hormuz at all. Not once before starting this.
16
Alexexy15 hr ago
+4
Man trying his best at beating Iran at chess by copying their moves.
Genius.
4
morbie515 hr ago
+29
> but also intervening with this war?
There is close to a zero percent chance that China will get involved in this war imo
29
justiceformahsa15 hr ago
+1
Zero percent they'll get involved and start WW3 against the US as listnookors believe.
Non-zero chance they take action against the IR, given that's the far easier and cheaper thing for them to do to resume shipments.
1
Odd-Row948515 hr ago
+2
They might not intervene but it won’t be militarily. I suspect they would respond economically and then try to broker a deal
2
Scriefers14 hr ago
+5
I doubt it, China is in not great economic shape as it is. Any sanctions it imposes will just be met by the other side as well as the economic hit China losing access to 15% of its oil imports due to this blockade. We’ll see, but I have my doubts.
5
asdf-764415 hr ago
+25
Believe it or not, armchair Listnook generals are more qualified to strategize for this war
25
frontfrontdowndown15 hr ago
+14
Reporting for duty
14
BellyDancerUrgot15 hr ago
+17
There is no “tiniest chance” it’s really just market manipulation. Tweeting was getting old because people eventually catch up to reality but then u move on to blockading it urself.
The only thing orange taco face and his idiotic fart boi secdef chief will understand is the combined might of the France , UK, Russia , China , India , Japan and GCs economically and militarily bearing down on them. Anything less and they will keep making the situation worse for everyone. It’s actually easier and more justified to go against the US now than Iran.
It will be really poetic if trying to cause regime change in Iran ends up being the cause of regime change in the US. Seriously hope that happens.
17
fec224515 hr ago
+5
Trump is really bad at evaluating second order effects which means he'd fit right in here.
5
EqualPassenger427115 hr ago
+5
They are this dumb, hate is one hell of a blinder.
5
MachineSpirited708515 hr ago
+6
It probably is market manipulation. It's been like this since the beginning. Highly doubt US changing tactics now. China probably wouldn't retaliate; probably prepared for this outcome too
6
jamie991015 hr ago
+4
China is already intervening with this war by supplying Iran with intelligence and weapons. They don’t have the capacity to project enough military power into the region so they can’t test blockade even if they wanted to.
4
HatchingCougar15 hr ago
+4
They can test the blockade by sending a single frigate as an e*****
Puts the US in a quandary
If it (the US) does nothing, then others will do the same.
If it tries to board the tanker anyway, then China has a decision to make. They can do nothing and take a PR hit or they can kill the boarding team.
Now the US has an absolutely critical decision to make. Do they sink the frigate in return?. If they do nothing, they lost a helo or two of troops and a PR disaster. But if they sink the frigate (which they could easily do), the US would be instantly in a hot war with China. A war the US is ill prepared, over stretched & out of position to fight.
True. The Chinese cannot force project to challenge what the US has in the Gulf of Oman…. But at minimum, US warships in the western Pacific better prepare their lifeboats and other US assets in the region (cough: Guam) are in serious, serious trouble
4
Intrepid_Egg_772214 hr ago
+6
> But if they sink the frigate (which they could easily do), the US would be instantly in a hot war with China.
Actually the casus belli for war would have already been committed by China in a previous step when they decided to...
>kill the boarding team.
You don't get to murk soldiers from another country committing an interdiction action on a civilian ship (even one you find to be illegal) and not have it be an act of war. Now if the boarding team was trying to board the frigate, that would be different.
If China were to send a frigate to e***** the ship, that's a legitimate deterrent, but not because the frigate crew gets to shoot down American helis trying to board tanker vessels.
6
TheVoters15 hr ago
+3
[ Removed by Listnook ]
3
2ManyCatsNever2Many15 hr ago
+2
the administration that booked an important speech at the FOUR SEASONS *landscape company* in philly - yes, yes they are that dumb.
2
Norfhynorfh15 hr ago
+2
When does china ever intervene in anything?
2
Gecks77715 hr ago
+2
China is likely to avoid directly intervening in the war. Might impose economic sanctions on the US, though. Might even send its own ships to e***** its own tankers, and dare the US to take a shot, if things get bad enough.
Hell, there might be quite a few nations that start doing this if the US actually throws up a full blockade.
A lot depends on how effective the blockade is. Actually going into the Strait and up to Iranian ports would make for a very effective blockade, but if Iran still has any smoke left to send, it could be very dangerous too- all it takes is one lucky shot, one shaky-cam video of a US warship sailing away trailing smoke, to turn this whole thing into a propaganda disaster.
Staying farther back and running down ships spotted via satellite is safer, but your interdiction rate won't be 100%, especially if a bunch of ships leave at once and scatter in different directions, forcing the US to choose which ones to chase and board.
2
HarEr8915 hr ago
+3
Officially never. China could send weapons to Iran with planes when there is a naval blockade but then US would bomb the planes and airports.
3
Atheist_373915 hr ago
+2
>Like they can't be this dumb,
Oh my sweet summer child
2
HellyFurtado15 hr ago
+2
Ron Howard: *There wasn't.*
2
landomakesatable15 hr ago
+9
doesn't this help Iran's effort of putting pressure on the oil supply to the REST OF THE WORLD ?
What? is USA now going to apply tolls on other countries?
Wouldn't Iran just send a few drones towards the blockaded ships?
9
Little-Chemical500615 hr ago
+83
So I guess now instead of Iran causing the oil price spike cause they block the Strait of hormuz. US is fully responsible for the oil price spike cause theyre the one blocking now.
Trump cause oil prices spike and sky high inflation by blocking oil flow. Thats gonna go well for midterm
83
Professional_Lime54115 hr ago
+20
Can you say Depression?
20
Little-Chemical500615 hr ago
+12
Updated headline: Trump cause global depression by blocking the Strait of hormuz
12
CustardVivid948315 hr ago
+5
No but I have it.
5
Lenske9715 hr ago
+3
Us and Israel caused this problem not iran
3
Little-Chemical500615 hr ago
+5
Optics is what im getting at. They can blame Iran for oil price cause they block the Strait.
That excuse wont fly if the US is doing its own blockade
5
StephenHunterUK15 hr ago
+4
It's blockading the Iranian ships so they don't benefit from the higher prices.
4
jorgebrks15 hr ago
+7
Three weeks ago the US lifted the sanctions on the sale of Iranian oil, which permitted them to benefit from the higher prices.
7
Thoroughaway00815 hr ago
+2
Very optimistic of us to expect there will be midterms this fall…
2
YoHabloEscargot15 hr ago
+4
My prediction is it’ll be riddled with lawsuits by the DOJ and Johnson will refuse to seat anyone in until the lawsuits clear… many months later, if at all.
Both of these have occurred in various forms before so it’s clearly in their playbook. I don’t see them pulling any stops if it means protecting their power.
4
Miserable_Vehicle_1015 hr ago
+1
I have a feeling they're not concerned about the midterms in the slightest.
1
FlimsyConclusion15 hr ago
+8
This is so beyond stupid.
To me this reads as another headline Trump wants to run with than TACO out, so his insiders can continue making bank manipulating the markets.
8
Zayaaz15 hr ago
+6
trump probably has some illness and going the walter white route. instead of drugs it’s market manipulation.
6
Cautious_Goose_556815 hr ago
+2
He is 79 years old. He is dying of old age
2
Nano_Burger15 hr ago
+6
I thought that the goal was to "un-block" the strait?
6
DisgrumpledBurnerTec12 hr ago
+4
"Open the strait you crazy bastards"
"Were closing the strait"
Excuse me
4
elinamebro15 hr ago
+4
So.. what does this do? I have no military experience so can someone enlighten me on the what strategic tactic this might be?
4
Khamvom14 hr ago
+5
Strategically, it applies political + economic pressure on the Iranian government. Iran relies heavily on its ports to export oil and to import just about everything else (food, consumer goods, raw materials, etc).
Essentially try to choke Iran to the bargaining table.
5
Foreign_Dimension85614 hr ago
+4
And send fuel prices to the moon. I'm smart, not like dumb. THANK YOU FREDO
4
cancercureall14 hr ago
+4
This will make oil even more expensiver. Orange you excited?
Even if they wont sell to us directly this means more competition for the existing and available supply. F*** us once, f*** us twice, orange man will f*** us thrice.
4
every-day_throw-away13 hr ago
+3
As if there was any question regarding why the world is paying more for gas it's perfectly apparent now.
3
KiwDaWabbit212 hr ago
+5
Trump Last Week: Open the Strait or we’ll annihilate your entire population!
Trump Today: F*ck you, we’ll close the Strait ourselves!
5
Strykehammer11 hr ago
+2
He didn’t want the strait open, he just wanted to look like the good guy. Especially since it was him who realistically closed the strait
2
KiwDaWabbit211 hr ago
+2
In other words, he’s a world class untrustworthy moron.
2
Adept-Target540715 hr ago
+7
So the Iranians are blocking the straight. Now we’re blockading the straight. Is this the geopolitical equivalent of you can’t fire me cause I quit?
7
Brapfamalam15 hr ago
+6
Buy the dip
6
YoHabloEscargot15 hr ago
+6
With what?
6
Foooour14 hr ago
+2
2nd mortgage
2
tricksterloki14 hr ago
+4
Context:
>CENTCOM said the blockade will be “enforced impartially against vessels of all nations.” It said it would still allow ships traveling between non-Iranian ports to transit the Strait of Hormuz.
Trump is trying to pretend the Strait is open while trying to prevent Iran from being resupplied(?). Honestly, it's dumb and not going to work. F*** Trump.
4
Carey__Rowe15 hr ago
+11
ah yes. exactly what the world needed rn, another genius move that DEFINITELY won't spiral into a massive disaster
11
Single_Comment638915 hr ago
+3
I need to get on the prediction market betting stuff because I just know he's going to Taco.
3
mx3goose15 hr ago
+3
Why? I was told we already won like 3 weeks ago.
3
Used-Squirrel870415 hr ago
+3
Somebody friend of his covered his oil short.
3
epanek15 hr ago
+3
This will spike oil prices more.
3
AdPure564514 hr ago
+3
This is just funny. America must be bleeding an absolute fortune into this operation and it's all just to band aid over a snafu caused by the lack of competence in the original operation. Suck. Shit.
I suppose Trump is American Putin after all.
3
AvisLord1214 hr ago
+3
For a country that prides itself on freedom and democracy, we really can't seem to convince people that being a d*** to Middle-Eastern countries for no reason is a bad thing, when they provide oil
3
APLJaKaT13 hr ago
+3
Past time to unplug the USA. Not sure if you should plug it back in again or not. It appears to be FUBAR.
3
exgeo12 hr ago
+3
A blockade right after granting a sanctions waiver to Iranian oil at sea lmao
3
brute-forced12 hr ago
+3
Insufferable moron at the helm
3
Low_Search_666710 hr ago
+3
Wouldn't it be hilarious if nato showed up to end trump's blockade?
3
DarkFireFenrir15 hr ago
+8
Then he'll say Tuesday, then TACO, repeating the cycle
8
Jeffuk8815 hr ago
+7
Wouldn't blockading ALL Iranian ports spread thr US Navy and make them more susceptible to Iranian drones?
7
pogo000415 hr ago
+5
I want to see the reaction of the first Chinese tanker stopped by the US.That's gonna be fun.
5
academic_partypooper15 hr ago
+12
Pretty sure (1) US doesn’t have enough ships to do this (2) it’s going to burn so much resources, this siege will end in less than a month
Yes this is a siege, and sieges are expensive, especially naval sieges
12
SilverAgedSentiel15 hr ago
+6
Sorry can't hear you over Putin dancing to [Rasputin](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nl_Eo2QzqU4) as his staff drags bags of money around from oil sales.
6
greatthebob3814 hr ago
+4
Yo dawg, I heard you like blockades. So I put a blockade on your blockade...
4
Plane-Breakfast-881715 hr ago
+20
Good luck with that "blockade." The Chinese Navy is already in the Strait escorting their own tankers, so the U.S. Navy is basically being asked to play chicken with a superpower over a $2 million credit card transaction.
Trump completely failed to predict that the "weapon" wouldn't be a missile, but a Yuan-denominated toll booth. Now he’s trying to use the Navy as a repo man to stop the rise of the Petroyuan. This is exactly how the guy bankrupted his casinos—doubling down on a losing hand and hoping the other side flinches first.
20
awr9014 hr ago
+18
This is just not true at all. China isn’t escorting shit
18
yetanothrmate14 hr ago
+5
Mmmm it seems the chinese navy is there
And chinese oil is nationalized .... so yeah idk if usa messing with it is gonna go well or just escalate this into ww3
God trump is stupid
https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2026/03/08/china-bolsters-naval-presence-in-strait-of-hormuz-amid-us-pressure-on-iran-and-venezuela/#:~:text=This%20Chinese%20naval%20deployment%20towards,Iranian%2Dcontrolled%20Strait%20of%20Hormuz.
5
Khamvom14 hr ago
+9
> The Chinese Navy is already in the Strait escorting their own tankers
Is there a source on this claim?..Iran’s been giving safe passage to Chinese shipping, but nobody’s reported on Chinese warships actually escorting Chinese tankers through the Strait (wouldn’t make much sense for them to when Iran is already giving them safe passage).
9
Guillepron15 hr ago
+2
This!
2
bijelo12315 hr ago
+6
"Iran is finished. I will now be charging for passage.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER"
6
jiminuatron15 hr ago
+2
How do they blockade? They intentionally wander outside of missile range. Going closer is counter productive.
Will they board neutral vessels in open waters?
2
myflesh15 hr ago
+2
Sounds like drones are back on the menu
2
barweis15 hr ago
+2
Putin's puppet, Trump, doing another madman's bidding. The entire MAGA federal apparatus is infiltrated with Russian loving subversives.
2
abbaJabba15 hr ago
+2
Captain Brownpants the pirate
2
robbiejandro13 hr ago
+2
Isn’t this the plot of Star Wars episode 1
2
Loose_Ad_510812 hr ago
+2
TACO incoming on monday
2
MiniMini66211 hr ago
+2
Pump n dump Monday
2
SoraUsagi10 hr ago
+2
You've got it.
2
Next_Service378810 hr ago
+2
He's playing 1-D Chess
2
supercali4510 hr ago
+2
TACO soon for sure … he can’t stop Iranian oil from going to market because global rates will go up
2
RaspberryTop6369 hr ago
+2
Back to war, didn't take long.
2
Acceptable-Pin293915 hr ago
+5
Excited to see if China test this blockade.
They import a lot of Iranian crude.
80% of Iranian crude goes to China which makes up about 14% of Chinas oil imports.
5
chillinwithchilis14 hr ago
+3
They are not going to test this blockade at all.
Thats not in china’s interests at all.
They will play along till 2028 if they have to for when another president is elected
3
Mr-Lungu15 hr ago
+5
Act of war, isn't it? What happens if a Chinese or Indian ship ignores them? Do they sink it?
5
awr9014 hr ago
+4
Seize it with marines. Hold it until Iran agrees to terms. That’s the plan for now before actual boots on the ground in Iran.
4
Academic_Taste66314 hr ago
+2
Lmao America isn’t seizing any Chinese or Russian ships.
2
awr9013 hr ago
+3
They seized Russian ships in Venezuela. They will seize what they want because they are the US navy.
3
CatsBye9015 hr ago
+3
Well some of his buddies will be making money from this, bet your ass on that
3
ImpossibleDragonfly15 hr ago
+3
I wonder if people are still going to toss around the argument of freedom of navigation and international law now that the US is also breaking it.
3
dextercho8315 hr ago
+3
So you are giving the Chinese a chance to test their weapons against the US ships. That sounds like a smart idea...🤦♂️
3
Brilliant_Version34415 hr ago
+2
Those marines on those ships must wonder if they’ll ever get home
2
No_Cream_723613 hr ago
+2
Worst decision other Countries are hurting because of what we initiated. Some have since been able to get approval for ships to pass. Recent they agreed to let more Countries oil through. So now we are blocking they from recovering from the situation we imposed on them. Also where will our Navy be in sticking distance! Because of this the only threats that truly can truly do us damage are coming into help I worry for our Military! This move is childish. They won’t play with me so no one can play with them wahhhh wahh sad times!!
2
beefstake15 hr ago
+1
So let me get this strait. You want to close the strait you ostensibly want open because gas prices are tearing you a new one?
To do so you are going to need to commit massive amounts of naval resources to the strait itself, the Gulf of Oman and/or Arabian Sea.
Meanwhile Houthis be like "have you heard of second strait?".
F****** amateur hour.
1
MachineSpirited708515 hr ago
+1
Watch US say they will start charging a toll for ships leaving the strait. Good luck blocking China's oil tankers and goods.
1
Straight_Sea893515 hr ago
+1
Overtime it can get worse than sending ground troops out front. And eventually we find out that we have to send ground troops whatsoever…
196 Comments