· 199 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 17, 2026 at 12:50 PM

U.S. considers $20 billion cash-for-uranium deal with Iran

Posted by RollSafer



🚩 Report this post

199 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
VampiricClam 2 days ago +11859
US: buys 1bn worth of uranium from Iran for 20bn Iran: buys 20bn worth of uranium from Russia 3 months later
11859
SmurfRiding 2 days ago +2401
They mostly probably still have centrifuges to make enriched uranium.
2401
famine- 2 days ago +1216
Here is the problem with the orange pedo's zero enrichment plan: Iran can not comply without shutting down all of it's civilian reactors and forgoing medical isotope generation. Iran running low enriched uranium is actually a good thing. It was a requirement under JCPOA and they modifIed their reactors so they couldn't use natural uranium. Why? Because it massively reduces the amount of weapons grade plutonium that their reactors produce. Before modification their reactors could produce enough plutonium for 2 bombs a year.
1216
Oerthling 2 days ago +362
Even worse, by bombing Iran Trump double-motivated Iran to get nukes now. After Putin's invasion of Ukraine and Trump trampling international treaties, threatening allies and attacking Venezuela and Iran - everybody and his brother is going to pursue nukes as insurance against such unrestrained aggression. Non-proliferation was a good idea (too many nukes raise the risk of the damn things getting used one way or another) - but it can only work in a world with some level of restraint. Now that the post-WW2 order is crumbling even countries that previously ruled out getting nukes are going to reconsider. World is getting stupider fast.
362
XimbalaHu3 2 days ago +79
I'll be surprized if in the next 20 years germany at least doesn't have nukes and getting those are at the forefront of the public discourse. Brasil for one has had a huge wave of investiment in missiles and miniaturization of nuclear reactors, the missing steps for modern ICBMs as the country already has the enrichment tech. In the next 30 years I see most latent nuclear countries as activelly nuclear and we'll see a bunch of new latent nuclear countries pop up.
79
montarion 1 day ago +17
> germany at least doesn't have nukes and getting those are at the forefront of the public discourse. Germany _HATES_ everything that even sounds like nuclear, though
17
Lucky-Elk-1234 1 day ago +15
All it takes is one horrible war to change their mind though. If US bails from NATO and Europe gets entangled in some war with Russia etc then Germany might want a good deterrent. Its ground army is not exactly huge these days.
15
Ok-Lingonberry7143 2 days ago +364
The US has previously offered to give them low grade materials for reactors and medical use free of charge indefinitely. There are ways around it if they actually intend to give up chasing a bomb
364
PopUpClicker 2 days ago +566
But then you are at the mercy or a country not sticking to a deal
566
MysteriousQuote4665 2 days ago +484
Which Trump proved is a very real thing...
484
birdman424344 2 days ago +22
Just like the Lanisters’….
22
Pabus_Alt 2 days ago +89
This halfway measure really is the worst. The old "deal" was "let the superpowers have the bomb and in return everyone else gets nuclear power and security guarantees" Those security guarantees have *repeatedly* been shown to be not worth the paper they are written on.
89
samdajellybeenie 1 day ago +8
The guarantee is only as good as the guarantor.
8
Crazymoose86 2 days ago +231
The USA is known for honoring its deals and treaties so at least there's that. /s
231
geomaster 2 days ago +50
yes donald the liar in chief destroyed the deal that was working. propaganda channels fed this narrative to the lemmings and of course donald did nothing solve the issue. because destroying is easy, creating solutions is difficult. go ahead and name when donald came up with a plan or a solution to anything we're still waiting for the healthcare plan...
50
Nick85er 2 days ago +22
JUST WAIT TWO WEEKS LIKE EVERYONE ELSE YOU ANTIFA RADICAL TERRORIST /s
22
Schmantikor 2 days ago +12
I don't really see how they would want to give up nukes now. The government people's main thought when falling asleep must be "Why didn't we try building our nukes quicker? Then America couldn't have attacked us.". That's how I see it.
12
PolygonMan 2 days ago +9
"The US has previously offered for Iran to be permanently reliant on them for domestic civilian nuclear technologies." What kind of idiot would take that deal considering America's dealings with the rest of the world. They had already given up on chasing a bomb with the JCPOA, and Trump ripped it up. They had a fatwa against developing nuclear weapons and America murdered the guy who issued that fatwa. Now his much-more hardliner son is in that position, while the IRGC is much more politically powerful and the religious leadership is weaker.
9
Gauntlets28 2 days ago +56
Sure, but if they agreed to that then the US could easily take away that offer without warning, which they absolutely would if it hurt Iran.
56
keboh 2 days ago +37
Ya, agreed. And with the rug-pulling they’ve seen from Trump, the chances of them trusting the US for long-term, stable deals like this is basically zero.
37
spackletr0n 2 days ago +31
It sounds so reasonable, right? Iran should take this deal. If we can get a time machine back to 2015 when the US honored deals and did not use leverage (like tariffs) to capriciously extract new concessions. The cost of screwing over the other side of a negotiation is that they don’t trust you anymore. Trump didn’t read that chapter in The Art of The Deal, I guess.
31
I_AM_THE_SEB 2 days ago +27
The problem is, the US is not reliable anymore. Iran cannot trust the US to honor any deal, so they cannot risk to be dependend on US deliveries for anything
27
Coffeedemon 2 days ago +17
>free of charge indefinitely. And zero reason to doubt the US at all!
17
apexxin 2 days ago +5
Except this isn’t really a thing, especially for many medical isotopes which need to be produced and used in a very short window. Can’t just ship em a bunch and let it sit in a warehouse.
5
nezroy 2 days ago +17
> The US has previously offered to give them low grade materials for reactors and medical use free of charge indefinitely. The last 12 years has proven why any country that actually takes a deal like this with the US is demonstrably stupid as f***. I'm *Canadian* and I will never again vote for a government here that would actually consider a proposal of that nature from the US. And we were best friends, neighbors, and defense partners. I cannot fathom anyone arguing in good faith that *Iran* should do anything but laugh at a "deal" like that.
17
NoxiousStimuli 2 days ago +8
>There are ways around it if they actually intend to give up chasing a bomb Something they shouldn't consider precisely because of Trump. He's demonstrated perfectly clearly the threat a rogue nuclear equipped nation poses.
8
ithinkitslupis 2 days ago +16
They can buy civilian reactor levels directly that was always an option. South Korea, Spain, UAE, Switzerland, ... list goes on... all run their nuclear programs that way. Russia will even take the spent fuel back afterward like they did with JCPOA. Iran only has one nuclear power plant for reference and another 2 planned eventually, it currently makes up \~2 percent of their grid so it's really not that big of a piece of their infrastructure. Their civilian power plant reactor takes \~5% enriched, the TRR for making medical isotopes takes 20%, they still enriched to 60% and higher which they have no need for except playing politics with weapon risks.
16
Goat_inna_Tree 2 days ago +10
Mostly probably is the most definit thing I have heard in a long time. Its a 50/50 long shot, but there is only a 10% chance of that.
10
one8sevenn 2 days ago +83
- The U.S. and Iran are negotiating over a three-page plan to end the war, with one element under discussion being that the U.S. would release $20 billion in frozen Iranian funds in return for Iran giving up its stockpile of enriched uranium
83
Shorties 1 day ago +29
What!? Isn’t this what was criticized about the previous Iran deals!?
29
Stockholm86er 1 day ago +28
This is literally the Obama deal. I kid you not. And Trump was the a****** that was saying the deal was bad because we will be paying them billions, when in fact it's been iranian assets all along and now he is doing the exact same deal. Trump is a POS and can't stand that Obama is better than him on all counts. The ultra baby narcissist.
28
TechnicalScheme385 2 days ago +126
Total differences. Iran has Industrial grade uranium. We buy it, for 20x the price. Meanwhile Iran is BANKing on their shipping fees, and this buyout plan. Later Iran buys weapons grade uranium from Russia or China. with the money trump gives them. So what was all this bitching about Obama and giving Iran 1.7B?(their own money back) Because trump trumps trump!
126
shef175 2 days ago +102
The $1.7B also wasn’t just “giving” money to Iran. It was a repayment of funds Iran spent with the U.S. in a 1979 arms deal and settled a long-running court case. But of course, facts are hard to process and inconvenient when you can further anger and scare your voting base. This is just an unforced stupid and bad idea, which is entirely on brand with this administration.
102
Morganvegas 2 days ago +24
Getting educated requires effort, remaining ignorant is much easier.
24
chokokhan 2 days ago +27
I am downright shocked Trump has bankrupted so many businesses before including casinos. What this business acumen???? How?!?!?
27
[deleted] 2 days ago +3642
[removed]
3642
tri170391 2 days ago +1152
MY deal is better, it is 20x bigger than Obama's /s
1152
Spork_Warrior 2 days ago +364
Your statement doesn't need to be marked as sarcasm. He really would boast about something like that.
364
GotEggs 2 days ago +62
Always good to clarify things in today’s society, people are stupid remember? (That’s how we got this administration)
62
NubEnt 2 days ago +85
Trump already gave them billions in oil revenue and sanction relief because *(checks notes)* he went to war with Iran and caused huge economic ripples that he didn’t anticipate or plan for.
85
Law-of-Poe 2 days ago +234
Same way the pizzagate crowd got really quiet when it was found out that that Trump was blocking the fact that he’s all over the Epstein files—even raped a thirteen year old Epstein girl
234
Nwah2112 2 days ago +79
As an OG “there is an international cabal of billionaire child sex traffickers” believer I’ll never understand how Trump won so many of us over. Like from the earliest moments of the “conspiracy theory” going mainstream it was clear that he was at least tangentially involved or knowledgeable. Clearly not everyone who ever met Epstein was in on this, but there are tapes of Trump joking about Epstein liking women on the young side and it was known that he’d been on his plane.
79
NumeralJoker 2 days ago +31
Unfortunately, these were the people who were wishcasting pizzagate into existence, not those who cared if Trump was connected to Epstein. It didn't matter if the evidence points to Trump being guilty because Trump promised he would take down the federal government, which they saw as being run by a black man. That was sadly all that mattered at that time.
31
FamousVillage1890 2 days ago +15
Wilful ignorance.
15
MyHobbyAndMore3 2 days ago +7
"he will drain the swamp". as it turns out he is the swamp.
7
Gamelove0I5 2 days ago +52
Have you been to the conservative sublistnook recently. More and more people are waking up to trumps bullshit. For every die hard maga user there's a dozen centre right people being actually reasonable. Trump posting an ai pic of himself as jesus really pissed off conservative Christians.
52
LePouletPourpre 2 days ago +86
Yes. That sub is saturated with foreign actors though. I don’t believe anyone in the comments section. The mods also work over time to suppress any post critical of Trump administration.
86
Wolfgirl90 2 days ago +18
>More and more people are waking up to trumps bullshit. For every die hard maga user there's a dozen centre right people being actually reasonable.  If they gave even the slightest bit of a damn about being reasonable, then Trump wouldn't be president right now. They only care about what Trump is doing right now because his actions are affecting *them* now. He's deporting *their* friends, neighbors, and spouses. He's sending *their* loved ones into war. He's cutting *their* benefits. He's increasing *their* groceries and healthcare costs. And he's making a public mockery out of *their* religion. These folks wanted to bask in Trump's 3 ring circus, but are now wondering why they are starting to smell elephant shit. Like bruh, I told you to move out of the way of that elephant's ass a decade ago.
18
[deleted] 2 days ago +27
[removed]
27
Imaginary_Hamster847 2 days ago +35
Also, every single time he does something crazy, a bunch of conservatives online "wake up" for 36 hours until they get their Facebook (or Fox News or whatever) marching orders, and then it's right back to the cult
35
iliveonramen 2 days ago +16
I’ve seen it happen realtime with family members. On a family vacation they were shell shocked after Trump’s debate against Harris. After consuming a days worth of Fox News it was “5 versus 1” and Trump actually did well
16
reddollardays 2 days ago +6
It’s such a sad little safe space.
6
silverbullet1989 2 days ago +12
Those that "wake up" are instantly banned and removed from the sub. Cant have people going against the safe space echo chamber.
12
samanime 2 days ago +5
You know, I'm just now realizing, Trump always talks about the "Art of the Deal"... but he never said it was the art of the GOOD deal...
5
Odd_Perfect 2 days ago +17
Hey WeRe AbOut to Have NuClEar WeapOnSS!!! Don’t you want world peace!
17
brickne3 2 days ago +5
I'd be happy to part with all my research for just £10 billion, it's out in the shed and almost done, pinky promise!
5
AdventurousNecessary 2 days ago +8
Must be nice for Republicans to only have a single value. "Trump is always right". We should never forget or forgive the Republican party for the damage done to the vast majority of this country and its reputation.
8
Prior-Explanation389 2 days ago +5
The issue was that Obama didn’t give them enough!!! Duh
5
0fficerGeorgeGreen 2 days ago +8
I was literally getting that clap-back just weeks ago when talking about the stupidity of all this. 'At least Trump isn't just giving them money!' What's the excuse now? Never ending.
8
jpiro 2 days ago +19
Especially when all Obama actually did was give Iran back its own money.
19
dambthatpaper 2 days ago +33
>The U.S. and [Iran](https://www.axios.com/world/iran) are negotiating over a three-page plan to end the war, with one element under discussion being that **the U.S. would release $20 billion in frozen Iranian funds** in return for Iran giving up its stockpile of enriched uranium, according to two U.S. officials and two additional sources briefed on the talks. This is literally the first sentence of the article, so if I'm not misunderstanding it, this is also "giving Iran back its own money"
33
Plappedudel 2 days ago +334
Nice, so this is just Obama's deal, but 10 times more expensive. Tired of winning yet?
334
MessMaximum5493 2 days ago +93
If you add in all the costs of the war it's probably 20 times lol
93
u9Nails 1 day ago +10
Yay! We're great again now, right? Maga? He spent our taxes greatly?
10
noremac2414 2 days ago +8
Art of the deal
8
HeartFullONeutrality 1 day ago +4
You mean infinitely more expensive, since the money Obama paid them was not ours, but theirs.
4
CarPhoneRonnie 2 days ago +358
I think he solved the Denny’s maze this morn and is feeling good
358
Careless-Age-4290 2 days ago +76
"Still got it! 😏"
76
UnTides 2 days ago +9
Later that night on "I got the best score ever on cognitive test! And 100% on dementia test, they've never seen a better score"
9
Puzzleheaded-Lab-635 2 days ago +1300
umm....so we are paying them 20 billion for their uranium... sound like they will mine more uranium for cash in the future.
1300
MileHighManBearPig 2 days ago +827
The Cobra Effect. Well studied economic stuff. In British-ruled India a bounty for dead cobras backfired. To reduce the snake population, the government offered cash for dead cobras. Instead of reducing snakes, this led to people breeding them for money, resulting in more, not fewer, cobras.
827
wait_what_now 2 days ago +265
And then when they ended the program, everyone just released their broods, making it soo much worse!
265
killboticus89 2 days ago +47
Damn dog Britain really was out there AB testing colonies 
47
Somhlth 2 days ago +19
I'm thinking of ordering a shovel myself now.
19
blueye525 2 days ago +453
Wait so I’m clear: - we had a nuclear deal (JCPOA) which Iran was honoring. - Trump and republicans criticized Obama for sending Iran $1.7b in returned funding / interest accrued as part of the deal. - Trump pulls out of Iran deal in first term and puts sanctions back on. Iran begins nuclear program again. - Trump bombs Iran nuclear program in 2025 “completely obliterating” it. - in 2026 Trump initiates a war (in the midst of diplomatic talks) with one of the goals being “no nuclear program for Iran.” Trump admin assassinates leadership and bombs civilian infrastructure, providing Iran justification for wanting to have a nuclear weapon as deterrent. - Talks start again for a new nuclear deal, and we’re considering buying their Uranium for $20b. What reason does Iran have to trust any agreement made by this administration? They’re gonna end up taking our money and continuing on with their nuclear program regardless. Art of the deal folks. Republicans are a joke
453
No-Good-One-Shoe 2 days ago +142
You should add all the parts where Trump and his buddies made tons of money.  That's the true art of the deal. 
142
MaxGoldFilms 2 days ago +50
According to some reports from the Iran negotiating team in Pakistan (which may or may not be true), Kushner inquired about receiving a portion of the Hormuz Toll as a part of a deal. That may be propaganda, but it's effective because it wouldn't be out of character.
50
TheKingOfSwing777 2 days ago +21
This seems more likely than not tbh.
21
koshgeo 2 days ago +18
The best deal that the US can currently hope for is basically the same deal that it tore up previously, which was torn up by the same guy that is negotiating now. No wonder Iran is reluctant. And that's after spending billions of dollars on war and tanking the global economy, none of which had to happen. I'm sure whatever deal is struck we'll hear about how "nobody else could have negotiated a deal as well as President Trump."
18
FalloutRip 2 days ago +631
But we can’t have free school lunches. Or healthcare or scientific funding. No sir.
631
Independent-Cow-4070 2 days ago +147
$20B would probably connect DC to NYC with high speed rail lol
147
Nwah2112 2 days ago +92
California’s high speed rail was approved in 2008, meant to be completed in 2020, has yet to run a train and is now projected to be $90B over budget and completed in 2033. NY’s LIRR tunnel to Grand Central was $13B over budget and a decade later than projected. I don’t think the country is capable any longer of meaningfully and successfully investing in infrastructure.
92
Independent-Cow-4070 2 days ago +61
Well if we learn from the CAHSR experience and stop letting shill lawsuits stop construction, we could definitely do it In fact it would probably cost less than $20B if our government ever grows some balls
61
blitznoodles 2 days ago +19
Not just lawsuits, the state government should've tried funding it properly rather than just starve it of money.
19
digidado 2 days ago +9
You can blame republicans for literally all of that.
9
knightgawd 2 days ago +8
Only if you let a private company run and it steam roll all the bull shit local and state governments do to prevent progress. See: California high speed rail.
8
ejoy-rs2 2 days ago +16
It's frozen assets. Not actual US money.
16
[deleted] 2 days ago +13
[removed]
13
Armano-Avalus 2 days ago +4
So it's sanctions relief?
4
xyouRABitchx 2 days ago +6
Did you read the article?
6
PedanticQuebecer 2 days ago +228
Remember when the Republicans made a huge deal of unfreezing about $30 Billion of Iranian assets as part of the JCPOA?
228
TJames6210 2 days ago +38
And unlocking those assets was reported by right wing media as "Obama sending Iran pallets of cash". Why tf are they so gullible?
38
PedanticQuebecer 2 days ago +24
I think it was pallets
24
Somhlth 2 days ago +82
Shhh. Republicans hate when you put two and two together.
82
Icutu62 2 days ago +121
So, couldn’t we have just offered Iran that from the start? Instead we wasted countless of billions of dollars, lost American lives and caused worldwide economic chaos. I’m beginning to think this “Art of the Deal” guy is a con man.
121
famine- 2 days ago +65
The world did under the JCPOA deal with Obama, and Iran was complying with all the requirements. The Republicans vowed to kill the deal in 2015/2016 when it was finalized, then in 2018 the orange pedo unilaterally pulled out of the deal. Iran has been slowly escalating for 8 years and reporting those escalations to the IAEA.   The deal was being worked on under Biden and slowly de-escalated under the pedo's second term.
65
Sideos385 2 days ago +17
Big difference is the money they got under JCPOA was their money already! We froze their assets!! This is literally handing them money which is what the republicans accuse Obama of doing
17
LUK3FAULK 2 days ago +8
It’s the same thing this time, this is unfrozen assets being given to them again. Still stupid though
8
El_mochilero 2 days ago +90
$20B for Iran, $20B for Argentina, $16B for Israel, $0 for your healthcare
90
Henry-8th 2 days ago +81
What a total knobhead. The Art of the Deal hey? The worst president in US history.
81
Azatis- 2 days ago +19
another L ! So they camouflage Irans reperations as uranium payment lol ! So much win...
19
BillButtlickerII 2 days ago +47
Dude this will go down as the stupidest administration in history. I don’t even need to know the future to know that no future president will make as many dumbass, corrupt, and narcissistic decisions. Genuinely f*** this administration, the GOP, and MAGA.
47
AcrobaticMistake2468 2 days ago +14
They bitched and moaned Moaned and bitched for years “Obama sent pallets of cash to help Iran engage in terror” Four hundred million is less than 20 billion right? I’m not crazy here am I?
14
BrothelWaffles 2 days ago +27
Remember when Republicans lost their f****** minds when Obama made the old Iran nuclear deal because part of it was giving them back their own money? Cause I sure as f*** do.
27
mortemdeus 2 days ago +23
I thought the whole reason we tore up the old Iran deal was because Obama gave them $1 billion. Now we are giving then $20 billion?
23
ratedsar 2 days ago +14
Trump in a future "What moron tore up that agreement, I had to go to war to get it back"  Just like usmca
14
ITSHOBBSMA 2 days ago +10
lol. And people want to complain about Obama funding terrorism?
10
roosterthumper 1 day ago +10
So over 15x the amount Obama released back, not even paid. So much winning. JFC how does he still have supporters.
10
Faroutman1234 2 days ago +16
Iran has thousands of trained nuclear engineers and thousands of centrifuges hidden away. They even can make modern carbon fiber centrifuges. The proverbial genie is out of the bottle. There is no way to inspect every cave in a country bigger than Iraq and Afghanistan combined. The best solution is to integrate Iran into the western economies so they have no incentive to attack neighbors. And defund the Israeli military.
16
royale_wthCheEsE 2 days ago +8
Aren’t these the same assholes constantly saying Obama had to pay Iran 1 billion dollars to get Iran to agree to the original nuclear agreement? ( note : he didn’t , just unfroze Iranian funds that Iran already owned)
8
kosmokramr 2 days ago +8
Remember when GOP lost their shit because Obama gave them $1bn not to build a nuclear weapon?
8
TheBlueBlaze 2 days ago +8
From the same administration that wouldn't let you forget that "Obama sent planes full of cash to Iran!", they are now considering doing what they constantly try to imply Obama did. They don't say "Obama used taxpayer money" because he didn't, he unfroze Iranian assets. He was effectively giving them back their own money. But this proposal *would*, in fact, be using taxpayer money to pay Iran.
8
i_am_voldemort 2 days ago +7
Didn't the right complain that Obama did this?
7
brodamansisterwoman 2 days ago +8
And Obama only did this in order to get a deal that stops them from getting new weapons. Trump‘s deal wouldn’t even achieve that and he’s freeing up 20x the amount of sanctioned cash
8
TuringC0mplete 2 days ago +7
But we can't afford to forgive student loans, healthcare, fix the roads, medicare, medicaid, child programs, etc etc etc etc..... got it.
7
Sniperonzolo 1 day ago +7
Wait, wasn’t Iran’s uranium obliterated in a strike in 2025, and then obliterated again in the war a few weeks ago? Oh wait, let me get this straight: - Trump started a war - spent BILLIONS bombing Iran - failed to destroy their centrifuges and uranium stockpile TWICE - caused the world economy to have a stroke - increased inflation for literally everyone on earth including the U.S. - lost even the last grain of credibility the U.S. still had within NATO and its **former** allies - failed to overthrow the Iranian regime - failed to secure any support from Europe - removed sanctions on Russia - damaged oil, polymer and fertilizer production globally - got his allies in the Middle East bombed - Irreversibly undermined NATO …and NOW HE WANTS TO PAY 20 BILLION to Iran for giving up their uranium?
7
Main-Bandicoot6477 2 days ago +30
But I never stop hearing about how Obama gave them pallets of cash!!? And that it funds terrorism!! And why didn't we do this before we killed children and got Americans killed and spent ten times that already and increased costs for regular people all over the world?
30
poppadada 2 days ago +6
yeah, the u.s. lost the war and is actually going to pay more than restitution
6
VegetableYesterday63 2 days ago +7
Let’s see- Obama treaty no uranium enrichment- Trump here is $20 Billion What a buffoon
7
Constant_Section1491 2 days ago +6
Wait we were supposed to recover Uranium, not pay them 20Billions for it. Also where's the regime change which was the stated goal when the war began.
6
Correct-Shine-1692 2 days ago +6
Coming from the guy that was complaining about Obama sending planes of cash…
6
peePpotato 2 days ago +7
These guys are fuckn morons.
7
gwarrior5 2 days ago +6
Could have not ripped up obamas deal. USA is so great right now, so f****** great.
6
lushootseed 1 day ago +5
Weren't republicans furious when Obama unfroze iranian money? I am sure they all will praise trump for giving them $20B...
5
magnamed 1 day ago +6
So Obama's deal, but 20 billion instead of 2 billion.
6
MenaFWM 1 day ago +3
And maga is going to be ok with it, while they lost their shit over the Obama deal…
3
Spoons4Forks 2 days ago +11
Can’t wait for Ben Shapiro to meltdown when he finds out Trumps doing the Obama deal x20 lmao
11
GryphonCough 2 days ago +6
Oh I’ve seen this one before!  The republicans are going to lose their f****** minds because a sitting US president gave cash to Iran. They will proceed to scream-whine about it for the next decade.  We all know republicans have unmovable morals and are never hypocrites about anything ever. So they definitely won’t be cheering this on as a massive win this time.  /s
6
mshaefer 2 days ago +5
We wouldn't be talking about pallets of American cash, are we? 20, did you say? That's at least....\[math sounds\]...a lot more than the 8 the GOP has screamed about the previous admin authorizing \[edit: 1.8 from Obama, 6 from Biden\]. Of course, they'll be quick to point out that none of it is American cash, it's just unfrozen funds, exactly like the last admin(s) but we can just ignore that for now. So, great work guys! Really moved Iran's geopolitical standing ahead light years, eroded virtually all of our allied relationships, made it abundantly clear how dependent we actually are on foreign oil, lost a handful of planes and servicemembers along the way and ended up with a worse deal with a higher price tag, Hard to imagine how one President could've done a worse job in less time. But those Lego videos, though...
5
Impossible-Flight250 2 days ago +5
Didn't they criticize Obama for doing something similar, even though it was like 1 billion of their dollars?
5
Illustrious-Kiwi8670 2 days ago +5
So giving them back money for nuclear concessions? Where have I heard about that approach before? It would be hilarious if it wasn’t so pathetic..
5
OneNormalBloke 2 days ago +21
And that in essence if what Dr Jesus is after in the first place. Question is, who will personally benefit?
21
kalekayn 2 days ago +5
No money for healthcare or education in the US but plenty of money for war and paying off dictatorships and other evil people.
5
dylanholmes222 2 days ago +4
BRO WHAT THE F***
4
The_mingthing 2 days ago +4
Wasn't Trump going to get it for free?
4
ScrewyYear 2 days ago +5
Everything this administration does is enrich Trump and his cronies. They’ll get richer while everyone else pays the bills.
5
SnivyEyes 2 days ago +5
Obama also released frozen Iranian funds and the GOP lied and said a plane full money was sent over.
5
Everheart1955 2 days ago +3
YOU MEAN LIKE THE DEAL YOU TORE UP, YOU F****** MORON
3
MEDICARE_FOR_ALL 2 days ago +4
Art of the deal. Sending 20 billion to Iran.
4
Hystus 2 days ago +4
Oh right, it's Friday!  Time to manipulate the market more
4
Moominsean 2 days ago +4
So we will give them $20 billion and they will continue to enrich uranium.
4
fjvgamer 2 days ago +4
Wait didnt Obama get roasted for giving iran their money back? Now we gonna actually give them tax money?
4
UofMtigers2014 1 day ago +5
Republicans crucified Obama for the Nuclear deal because we unfroze less than $2 billion in Iran assets. But not republicans are totally fine with $20 billion
5
Bleakwind 1 day ago +3
art of the f****** deal yall. EVERYTHING.. EVERYTHING this asshat touches turns to shit.
3
themadpants 1 day ago +4
This idiot and his administration are the most useless unqualified morons. We had a deal with them, where we gave them no money from American Tax Payers, and they allowed monitoring of their nuclear program by independant inspectors, and you tore it up because your ego would not allow something a democrat did to stand. And here you are getting us in to ridiculous amounts of debt like you have a blank check. whats another 20 billion? How much are your real estate agent negotiators, who are not qualified to tie a shoe lace taking off the top? FUUUUUUUUUU. The stupidity knows no bounds.
4
Oh_reaaaally 1 day ago +3
This is the same president that talks about Obama handing them a plane full of cash, this admin continues to outdue itself
3
Yourponydied 1 day ago +4
"Pallets of cash"
4
lushootseed 1 day ago +4
Why isn't Israel buying it as they were the ones that didn't want a nuclear Iran?
4
mcbeardsauce 1 day ago +3
Imagine how many people you could pull out of poverty with $20B?
3
Parking_Abalone_1232 1 day ago +5
I can't believe Chump is going to just give Iran $20B. Especially after all the bullshit he's given Obama for giving Iran money.
5
dntbstpd1 1 day ago +4
Haha, the MAGAt trash complained about Obama approving $400 million of IRAN’S OWN MONEY to be returned to them and now they’ll have to figure out some mental gymnastics to get over TWENTY F****** BILLION being handed to them by Trump lmao
4
Edwardv054 1 day ago +3
Obama had the same deal for only $1.7 billion, Trump screwed it up.
3
btspman1 2 days ago +12
I remember how PISSED the GOP was when Obama negotiated 1.7 billion. Are they going to be pissed now??
12
Weshtonio 2 days ago +8
A cash-for-something deal? Isn't that just buying? So they're buying some stuff. Couldn't they have just done that to begin with?
8
ballsackface_ 2 days ago +3
Hilarious
3
SpaceC0wboyX 2 days ago +3
Remember that time we already had a comprehensive nuclear deal with Iran and Trump and the republicans were going absolutely crazy because we were “giving them money” even though we just unfroze and unsanctioned their accounts. Now we’re gonna pay them to secure a worse deal?
3
ThePlasticSturgeons 2 days ago +3
Jesus Christ. Why not just lead off with that instead spending a trillion dollars on failed military intervention first? These are the stupidest people who have ever walked on two legs.
3
wtfbenlol 2 days ago +3
You're f****** kidding me. If I see one more magat talk shit about Obama giving Iran their own money I'm gonna flip
3
BoudinBallz 2 days ago +3
Jesus H tapdancing Christ
3
trip6god 2 days ago +3
Sounds like “negotiating with terrorist” but ok lol
3
Rodinsprogeny 2 days ago +3
I thought all of this was necessary because Obama "gave them pallets of money". But at least it was their own, newly unfrozen money, and not $20 billion of *taxpayer* money. Absolute clown show.
3
Fuck_Me_If_Im_Wrong_ 2 days ago +3
Didn’t we used to have a cash for uranium deal with Iran?
3
Capital-Control308 2 days ago +3
So the USA and Israel do $200B-500B damage to Iran and then offer $20B. Mmm
3
Saneless 2 days ago +3
Shart of the deal
3
Apprehensive-Tip9373 2 days ago +3
They still got $20 billion? That fiat machine has been going brrrrr for awhile now.
3
Sad-Side-8704 2 days ago +3
Lmao isn’t this what maga raged about last time? We GAVE them tax payer dollars right?? /s
3
liquidsyphon 2 days ago +3
I thought they hated the Obama deal because he gave them money? Or didn’t he just unfreeze their own money? He’s setting up Iran to have their own toll booth and paying them billions….
3
9ersaur 2 days ago +3
In EU5 this is called paying war reparations after losing a war
3
veryboredatwork 2 days ago +3
So it was a shakedown in the end?
3
AngryMillennialFU 2 days ago +3
They bitched about Obama unfreezing funds now its ok if their white jesus does it?
3
fhilcollins666 2 days ago +3
I hope that they have to send pallets of cash. Oh, the sweet sweet MAGA schadenfreude.
3
Baxkit 2 days ago +3
Can a historian tell us if there has ever been any dumber leadership in any major society in history?
3
ElectricDayDream 2 days ago +3
Wait. Wait.. we are gonna pay them with money on pallets? But this time it’s our money on pallets?!?!?! Where’s the burning effigies?!?!
3
MrBubblepopper 2 days ago +3
I thought all the weapons grade stuff was destroyed or burried underground Right ??
3
PaceEBene84 2 days ago +3
This might as well be an admission of defeat
3
DepletedPromethium 2 days ago +3
Iran doesnt even have weapons grade uranium due to the previous nuclear weapons deal that was inplace. So now the US wants to buy their shit uranium and help further fund the shaheds and other weapons of war going to help russia against ukraine? what the actual f***.
3
oncemoor 2 days ago +3
Trump is the epitome of starting a fire, causing more damage, getting back less than we had before and then claiming victory.
3
long-and-soft 2 days ago +3
How is this not worse than the Iran nuclear deal lmao
3
williamgman 2 days ago +3
Can we stop using the term "US" on these stories? It's the folks proping up the Trump administration considering this.
3
enakj 2 days ago +3
Didn’t Trump and MAGA go bad shit crazy when Obama’s administration made a similar deal with Iran? Hi pot, this is kettle.
3
velwein 2 days ago +3
So… we’re sending them pallets of money… wasn’t that one of the MAGAts memes about Obama’s original deal, that was only a fraction of this?
3
Odd_Zookeepergame_69 2 days ago +3
Oh you mean that the US could have just asked nicely to purchase the uranium and didn't have to start a war that effected everyone in the world?
3
jimnylover 2 days ago +3
Imagine if Obama came up with this idea. The Republican backlash
3
SeparateSpend1542 2 days ago +3
Tell this story to your kids when they don’t have healthcare
3
sullen_agreement 2 days ago +3
and Obama got lambasted for giving Iran back its own money conservatives are not serious people
3
III00Z102BO 2 days ago +3
The same people that lambasted a previous administration for releasing Iran's own money in exchange for a deal regarding their nuclear program. Of course.
3
Gildenstern2u 2 days ago +3
We’re all done paying taxes right?
3
sjrotella 2 days ago +3
\*Insert Dennis Reynolds You Dumb B**** Meme\*
3
cutlineman 2 days ago +3
Obama giving Iran money to stop their nuclear program is bad because it would never work, but Trump giving Iran money to do the same thing is good and will definitely work. Got it. Just wanted to make sure I was following along.
3
thinkmoreharder 2 days ago +3
We learned nothing from the planeload of gold and Swiss francs.
3
themightywurm 2 days ago +3
we should just let them have one of our nukes now and get it over with
3
cash8888 2 days ago +3
Healthcare
3
just_mark 2 days ago +3
just think. this problem was resolved by Obama orange man ripped it up cuz it was from a black president he has tried and failed to reach an agreement even half as good
3
tekniklee 1 day ago +3
Let me buy my way out of this with someone else’s money
3
sonofblackbird 1 day ago +3
Oooh but Biden was giving Iran money??? Imagine how many drones they can make with 20b
3
Starter-for-Ten 1 day ago +3
Trump is paying £20b for nothing.  It's part of the deal to keep the straight open. But he has to say that he's getting something for his money....he's not. 
3
JoshAllentown 1 day ago +3
Remember when Trump was so upset about the Obama deal to give them back $1.7 Billion that legally already belonged to them?
3
Tirrus 1 day ago +3
Wasn’t the right recently raging about Obama/biden giving Iran a bunch of money?? I wonder how they’ll spin this as a good thing. F****** lemmings.
3
KuroKageB 1 day ago +3
Ooh... are they offering "pallets of cash?"
3
← Back to Board