· 118 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 21, 2026 at 10:16 AM

US gov't blocks China's largest LED chipmaker's $239 million bid to acquire Dutch lighting firm Lumileds — US blocks acquisition attempt of European firm

Posted by ZealousidealHead5488


US gov't blocks China's largest LED chipmaker's $239 million bid to acquire Dutch lighting firm Lumileds — US blocks acquisition attempt of European firm
Tom's Hardware
US gov't blocks China's largest LED chipmaker's $239 million bid to acquire Dutch lighting firm Lumileds — US blocks acquisition attempt of European firm
Semiconductors using gallium nitride tech continue to be a red line for CFIUS.

🚩 Report this post

118 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
EndOfDecadence 1 day ago +1633
As a Dutch person: how our government handles this stuff is ridiculous, too afraid to step on toes, letting our strategic assets fall into foreign hands. Its not only the Chinese, but also the US. Our government is highly digitalized, and the company that is responsible for all the software is being sold to an US company ffs. Absolutely incredible and infuriating, we need to wake up from our geopolitical vacation.
1633
M4chsi 1 day ago +280
What is going on with ASML at this very moment is also astonishing.
280
__LankyGiraffe__ 1 day ago +121
Can I please get a skinny on what is happening?
121
M4chsi 1 day ago +300
They are building a new campus [that is expected to create 20,000 new jobs.](https://www.dutchnews.nl/2026/03/asml-gets-green-light-for-new-campus-creating-20000-jobs/) at the same time they [lay of a lot of jobs to innovate](https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2026/03/13/asml-moet-simpeler-worden-ook-dat-is-innovatie-a4922672) despite [profiting off tax returns from the Innovation box](https://fd.nl/bedrijfsleven/1592577/ruim-90-vanalle-voordeel-uit-innovatiebox-naar-asml-msd-en-booking) scheme of the Dutch government.
300
__LankyGiraffe__ 1 day ago +34
Thank you for that
34
EndOfDecadence 1 day ago +44
Nothing wrong with firing obsolete layers of management.
44
M4chsi 1 day ago +38
I’m not that familiar with the details, but from what I’ve heard, they don’t seem to be obsolete, and employees are even [protesting against](https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wcsGsSPYU6s) the layoffs, which also seem to be harming the work culture.
38
EndOfDecadence 1 day ago +135
1700 people in management where fired after engineers had repeatedly warned about the rising bureaucracy in the company, and falling behind on innovation because of it. ASML listened and removed a part of that management layer. Nothing wrong with staying competitive.
135
Reddia 1 day ago +8
No one has been fired yet.
8
Astralsketch 1 day ago +20
middle management didn't like that
20
Mezatino 1 day ago +4
I’m middle management and absolutely useless in the role. I bet plenty of them were too lol
4
[deleted] 1 day ago +1
[deleted]
1
M4chsi 1 day ago +1
I'm not trying to do anything. This is just what I hear from people working at ASML.
1
Public-Position7711 1 day ago +35
Yeah. It’s been an online trend where people make these videos of them selves whispering to the camera and tapping on things with their fingernails. Really weird.
35
CheeseStickChomper 1 day ago +17
That is ASMR
17
939319 1 day ago +16
No, ASMR is saying PC is the best gaming platform.
16
caboosetp 1 day ago +9
No, that's PCMR. ASMR are the appendages you use to transport your hands to different locations to perform tasks.
9
Few-Sheepherder-1655 21 hr ago +3
No that’s PCR. PCMR is the Precancerous Molecular Resource.
3
M4chsi 1 day ago +2
What? That does indeed sound weird.
2
ImaginaryCheetah 1 day ago +11
it's mostly a f*****. 95% of ASMR "content creators" are women, most of whom happen to be wearing revealing clothing in at least some of their videos. the other 5% is sweet sweet japanese woodworking videos.   there's a whole additional f***** of "bedtime story" videos, which ostensibly are just people reading bedtime stories, but in reality is 99% women whispering sensuously^1 and often wearing revealing clothing   ^1 up to interpretation.
11
Recent-Result2852 1 day ago +15
Sounds like someone only gets off on Japanese wood.
15
ImaginaryCheetah 22 hr ago +2
ain't no shame in my game. i also dig stuff like [industrial processes](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LtzUvmoCMpY) and [street food cooking](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9e1cw8KfO2E), which i think could still qualify as ASMR, but there's a distinct lack of scantily dressed women involved in these.
2
thebetterbeanbureau 1 day ago +1
It sounds GREAT
1
JackSpyder 1 day ago +100
Same for the UK france etc. We b**** about enshittification and a lack of jobs and lack of tax i come. But we sell all our companies in Europe to China or america etc then suddenly the staff are let go, thibgs offshore, quality plummets to slop, and we wonder why there are no jobs and big European companies and all the tax money suddenly drops to €1 and is funneled abroad. We're having our industry and institutions sold from under us.
100
ChapterN7 1 day ago +20
Billionaires just buying up the world. Somethings gotta give.
20
calmingchaos 1 day ago +13
Canada: “first time?” Everyone seems to be selling to two countries now and it’s absolutely terrifying.
13
M4chsi 1 day ago +29
Another big problem is, that even European big money (like banks, central banks and governmental stock funds) are not willing to invest into europe.
29
Albertuscamus12 1 day ago +4
Offshoring to America makes no sense lol, the labor costs are significantly expensive here. China/India/SE Asia makes sense, that's where all of America's jobs are going to
4
beginner75 1 day ago +6
Your politicians are paid off to sell off assets?
6
Heizard 1 day ago +12
But think about those short term profits! And shareholders! /s
12
NeuroPalooza 1 day ago +19
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this the same as the EU imposing certain rules on US companies, which they do all the time (rules which end up impacting American consumers?) If you do business in another country, you become subject to certain limitations, and the more business you do, the more beholden you are. It's not necessarily a bad thing, just the cost of international business.
19
EndOfDecadence 1 day ago -6
Not entirely the same thing. Yes, we have some rules in the single market. For example food safety standards. If you want to sell your stuff on our market, you need to adhere to these rules. Strategic interests however should always be protected. If we sell it to another country meaning we could lose our interest over it, we simply shouldn't sell it. In the case of the software: the US has this rule that it can access any data from US companies if needed. So we would be mad to give this software company to the US, where the only question will be *when* another state (the US) will look into Dutch citizens files. That has nothing to do with the cost of doing business, its just incredibly stupid.
-6
SneakyFire23 1 day ago +11
Nope! The legal mechanism is the same, the EU forces any legal entity with an EU presence to comply with EU laws. In this case, this company has a US presence, therefore will need to comply with US laws.
11
EndOfDecadence 1 day ago +9
Yes, nothing wrong with that specific case. I'm talking about my example, the company behind DigiD. I'm not criticizing the law or the mechanism, I'm criticizing my government for allowing such a sale because of the mechanisms in place.
9
TinkW 1 day ago +4
At least you're not Brazil, where a company that owns rare earth mines (ehich can easily be clasified as. Aceitação asset) is being sold to some random ass American company just so that the US government can have access to it now that it's not that easy to get the minerals from China. And somehow the far-right in the country is all-in for it because their dream is to be US' dogs.
4
Due-Department-8906 1 day ago +2
If it makes you feel better (it won't), the US also does this kind of stupid offloading. For a long time most of our RAM chips were made in either China or, you guessed it, Taiwan. Insanely sketchy. Years later the CHIP act gave the CEO of micron money to build in the US and now he acts like he's a genius of military defense for not having all the assets in China and Taiwan... These rich people are insanely stupid and short sighted, yet they own everything. They only think in terms of their bonus, not the welfare of the company. Just look at the Boeing 737 Max fiasco. Just about bankrupt one of the most important companies on the planet... and the CEO got a sweet $63 million payout for murdering hundreds of people. Classy.
2
asd417 20 hr ago +1
Yeah it's ridiculous. Why isnt ASML treated like the TSMC of EU?
1
KGN-Tian-CAi 1 day ago +1
We as EU are too reliant on Washington for defense but also overly dependent on Beijing for economic prosperity. The priority order is as such.
1
___metazeta___ 1 day ago -6
The US DOE developed the UV tech at national labs. ASML licenses it and builds the lithography machines. If anything, we need to bring this tech back to the US and cancel ASMLs license agreement since they seem to want to appease foreign adversaries.
-6
EndOfDecadence 1 day ago +8
Quite uninformed comment. Cymer is owned by ASML. This entire machine is full of products only a single company can make. Cymer for the (DUV, old version) light source, Zeiss for the lenses and Trumpfh for the laser.
8
IncidentalIncidence 1 day ago +2
this would absolutely be cutting off our nose to spite your face. Besides the fact that ASML machines are already subject to US export controls, it takes about 30 seconds to figure out why this would be catastrophic for everybody, the US included. It's true that the US can already make the light sources through Cymer, which is arguably the most difficult part. But it still took 20 years for the machine to be developed, including nearly 10 years *after* they already had a working light source. Even if we assume that onshoring it would go faster because we broadly know how it's done (which ASML didn't, they had to develop it all from scratch), it would take at the absolute minimum a decade between starting development and actually being able to deploy a machine, and more realistically 15+ years. Even laying aside whether it would be a reasonable and fair thing to do given that ASML developed the machines when the US manufacturers gave up on it (granted, they got a lot of US government money over the years to keep the project alive), it just isn't a realistic possibility in any reasonable amount of time.
2
SneakyFire23 1 day ago -12
No, it's because if the Dutch government did anything about this then the US companies would have no issue ignoring EU rules/regs/laws. This is literally the same mechanism that the EU uses to force compliance on a US company.
-12
EndOfDecadence 1 day ago +4
I don't think you understand what I'm saying very well.
4
DecembersDragons 1 day ago +410
*How* exactly can an American agency do this? Article didn't tell me. 
410
metamec 1 day ago +324
Because Lumineds has US subsidiaries, IP, customers, and contracts, which bring it under CFIUS scrutiny. If the CFIUS says "this stuff can't be part of any acquisition," then it effectively renders it pointless.
324
DecembersDragons 1 day ago +87
Got it. So if Lumineds had no such connections to the US then the CFIUS would have no say?
87
metamec 1 day ago +121
Yeah, that's about it. It's a trade off when businesses go multinational. They become party to multiple legal and security regimes at once.
121
PleaseGreaseTheL 1 day ago +19
They might also be restricted in doing trade here in some ways. European courts have sometimes blocked American company M&A's (and many other things)under all the same reasoning. This is nothing new and not some "oh no evil USA" thing. Its normal and all countries can do it. The EU blocked GE and Honeywell from merging, two American companies.
19
6295585628015862 1 day ago +33
Hoover, Gavin Belson’s head of security on the tv show *Silicon Valley* used CFIUS to great effect to stop Foxhole, an Ashley-Madison style dating app, from being sold to a foreign company. I had no idea it was a real law.
33
EndOfDecadence 1 day ago +41
The operational HQ is in the US.
41
JohnHwagi 1 day ago +16
When a foreign company operates in a country, they have to follow their laws. They operate in the U.S. and are subject to our laws, alike how American companies like Instagram can be fined by the EU because they operate there. This is better for both the Netherlands and the U.S. though, this is strategic tech funded by shared research between the U.S. and Europe.
16
Kalthiria_Shines 1 day ago +17
Same way the EU sticks its fingers in mergers between US companies, or fines Instagram or Steam or Blizzard or whatever.
17
SneakyFire23 1 day ago +41
It's the same mechanism that the EU uses to force US companies to comply, why is this so hard to understand when it's the reverse? For \*Years\* Europe has been taking advantage of this mechanism to force compliance against the US companies doing business there, now that it's on the other foot people are upset?
41
sol-4 1 day ago +5
Because EU victimhood. And anything EU is sacred on listnook.
5
M4chsi 1 day ago +3
The very same could have happened to the merger of Microsoft and ActivisionBlizzard.
3
hackenclaw 1 day ago +30
why would you want to sell the companny if you are making serious profit? (Are they? ohh)
30
Landon1m 1 day ago +25
You usually want to sell a company when you are in high profitability so you can get the most for it. There will be a premium for positive revenue beyond just the assets of a company. Companies sell every day.
25
HashMapsData2Value 1 day ago +4
Yes and the purchasing company can probably find some synergistic combination with its existing assets/portfolio.
4
CryptoThroway8205 18 hr ago +3
Ohh is right. Sounds like it's bad for the company since my search for the company turns up layoffs. Wouldn't be surprised if the company ends up shutting down.
3
WasThatInappropriate 1 day ago +21
Headline is a little misleading. This Dutch firm has operations (and a regional HQ) in the US, this is the element which is blockable. The firm could spin off its US facilities and be outside of US jurisdiction.
21
metalmonkey_ 16 hr ago +2
It depends on how much of their revenue is from the US. Moreover, moving HQ takes time and money.
2
Golemfrost 21 hr ago +7
Why does the US have any say in this?
7
trailercock 1 day ago +11
It's because the US government owns the rights to EUV technology, semiconductors and chip making. These tech products were first developed in the US and licensed to ASML and other companies. These companies can not sell or transfer the tech without US approval.
11
M4chsi 1 day ago +68
Thank you! Why can’t the EU do this?
68
kobrons 1 day ago +18
At least a couple of years ago there was no legal framework to stop stuff like this. Especially if the company was publicly traded. I don't know if that legal framework was created by now.
18
M4chsi 1 day ago +2
Thank you for the input. I didn't know that. Although I though, that falls under the antitrust law.
2
Silver_Middle_7240 1 day ago +28
The EU doesn't mind selling out to china. Europes leader envy china's system
28
M4chsi 1 day ago -16
Mental experiment: If you like the economic system of China, why would you want them to grow instead of adapting and applying their system to yours?
-16
FuraidoChickem 1 day ago +6
Because selling it give them money, which is nice.
6
Silver_Middle_7240 1 day ago -7
helping china be successful makes imitating their systems more palatable.
-7
M4chsi 1 day ago +1
That seems to be stupid. But our politicians are so stupid you could be right.
1
Xylus1985 1 day ago -13
Probably EU welcomes foreign investments into their market
-13
M4chsi 1 day ago +31
It’s an investment for the Chinese economy. They buy only for the ip and knowledge. As soon as they are done, they drop the company. Edit: Look at Osram or the whole german „Mittelstand“.
31
EndOfDecadence 1 day ago +24
We've seen multiple times now that companies being bought by China, the knowledge is stripped and production being moved abroad. Not in every case, but for strategic recourses this is definitely the case.
24
vector_search_blue 1 day ago +3
From a country that supplies 90% of Russia's electronics used in weapons against Ukraine
3
Dnabb8436 1 day ago +3
With china that's just asking for your shit to be stolen. Its not an investment
3
Big_Poppers 1 day ago +3
They are literally buying it?
3
Appropriate_Swim9528 1 day ago
So… basically Broadcom?
0
DutchProv 1 day ago +12
Can our government grow a f****** spine please.
12
Minimum_Leadership51 1 day ago +10
First time I'm glad the US is doing the EU's job. Why are we still selling out best companies out left and right? It's so stupid it's redicolous. I mean, I'm sure that they are well aware of that but I can't grasp a solid argument not to put your whole economy on sale... 
10
DefectMahi 1 day ago +27
It's actually ridiculous how companies back by the state (China) can own public companies in other countries. Isn't this just hostile takeover? Also shouldn't this be a massive clause to stop this from happening?
27
mewalkyne 20 hr ago +5
A hostile takeover is something else entirely, and isn't actually hostile.
5
Skythewood 1 day ago +30
Sounds like an EU problem and EU should be able to stop the takeover lawfully. Having the US do it just make the dutch look like pushovers.
30
pepehandreee 9 hr ago +1
Hostile takeover means the upper management (board of directors) of the company is against the acquisition, yet the pursuit continues through subterfuge (lets say, I wish to buyout ur company above market rate but u don’t want to sell, so I start pumping money via stock market into ur firm and start replace ur board members with those who r fine with me acquiring u). If company A wants to buy company B and company B is willing to sell, then this is standard M&A since well, there is nothing hostile. Whether A is a SOE or not matters very little, since if B only wants the bag, they wouldn’t care where the bag is coming from. People r not gonna like this statement, but if a company is in private sector and u r not part of the board nor r u part of the regulatory body, then ur opinion really shouldn’t mean shit during an acquisition deal.
1
Yaruo0310 1 day ago +20
Even doing this won’t be enough to stop China’s progress anymore.
20
DutchProv 1 day ago +7
Theres a reason China is buying these companies, and its not because they are useless to them.
7
catchy_phrase76 1 day ago +8
So just roll over and die? Small steps, China dumping on the EU while they buy little to nothing may get them to wake up and start to move now that China isn't dumping on the US in the way it was before. Great Power Competition is alive and well. It's not fought in overt warfare, just slow continuous momentum.
8
Astralsketch 1 day ago -1
except the war on Iran which will upend the global power balance but go off.
-1
catchy_phrase76 1 day ago +2
That might have different effects than you think. Trace back all of the Iranian backed groups keeping the middle east unstable and Africa keeps burning. Take away the groups Iran funds and there is a chance for the African Union, a chance for some sort of stability in the Middle East. A chance for the US to stop being engaged in a hundred little proxy wars with Iran. Where Iran just causes chaos everywhere to keep everyone occupied. Specifically on Africa, forcing those nations to partner with Russia, China or the US. Creating ripe grounds for coups. I'll criticize the US all day long, this venture into Iran doesn't look thought out at all. The end result may be a net positive for the region and Africa directly.
2
Astralsketch 1 day ago +1
the problem is no one can predict what is going to happen, it could lead to a horrendous refugee crisis if trump makes good on his threats. It could lead to Iran becoming a world power, it could lead to war with china, it's too stupid.
1
catchy_phrase76 1 day ago +2
Iran becoming a world power? LMAO, they can't project power besides their little area. We fucked up, namely Bush Junior fucked up in labeling Iran a part of the axis of evil, when they were originally helping in Afghanistan. Trump fucked up and blew up the nuclear deal, instead of realizing we get inspections and they will come back to the table in the future. Pandora's box is open now though. You can call this stupid all day long and I'll agree. But this will be a bigger f*** up, if we just tuck our tail and declare victory now. It sucks, it's fucked up, there isn't a happy, singing why can't we be friends solution currently. China doesn't want a war. They are playing the long game for Taiwan right now. If munition stocks deplete, this could give China the opening to take Taiwan through force. Leaving us to sit and watch it happen. I have doubts that munitions are actually that low or could even go that low, but who the hell knows. You're right that you can't predict the future, you have to shape it. Or just put your head in the sand and accept what everyone else does...
2
Astralsketch 1 day ago +1
america is angling to control the straits of malacca too. China won't sit idly by and let america shut down it's oil imports, but they have reserves, they can let this play out for a while longer. And Yes, Iran could become a world power, they have force projection in the region, they could shut the al-mandeb strait down. They already threaten the gulf. They could become a power on the level below America or China.
1
catchy_phrase76 1 day ago +2
And that is why this is fucked and Pandora's box has to be dealt with, or this could spiral into something far less favorable. Iran currently has no capability to project power beyond their borders, just happen they are right on the strait. Iran isn't shutting down al-mandeb. The Houthis who they fund are. This is nothing more than a terrorist group who they support to start little fires and keep fires burning to distract from them. Same in Africa. Can only control what you can control, but can shape the outcome, or let someone shape it for you and get what you get.
2
AntiDECA 1 day ago +22
Why is America being useful and protecting European assets instead of Europeans? I mean, I know why, they have an egg in the basket too, but maybe the other 7 eggs in Europe should be doing something about it as well rather than trying to crack themselves. 
22
Ultra_Metal 1 day ago -7
European leaders are weak, stupid and incredibly corrupt.
-7
Martrim 1 day ago +12
Still better than an orange demented warmongering pedo
12
ChapterN7 1 day ago +10
If we set the bar that low then anyone can step over it.
10
Rdtackle82 1 day ago +1
All of em? Damn, those are pretty tough odds.
1
M4chsi 1 day ago -4
Maybe America wants to buy it? Edit: Of course I mean an American company.
-4
IncidentalIncidence 1 day ago +14
Lumileds was originally a joint venture between Philips and an American firm, which is why so much of their operations/assets are in the US, which is why the US blocking acquisition of that part of the business kills the deal.
14
s0rce 1 day ago +4
I visited the fab to look at buying some lab equipment. Was kinda sad how quiet it was with clean rooms shut down and no one around
4
__NadirZenith__ 22 hr ago +1
In the Nederlands? 
1
s0rce 22 hr ago +1
No, San Jose, California.
1
M4chsi 1 day ago +1
Interesting.
1
erebuxy 20 hr ago +2
Wow, the comment section today is unexpectedly sane. Huge W
2
thisismycoolname1 1 day ago +5
This is a good thing guys
5
MyAccountWasBanned7 1 day ago +4
If China wants to buy something from Europe, how tf does the US have any say in the matter?
4
Kalthiria_Shines 1 day ago +14
The same way that the EU has a say over two US companies merging?
14
metalmonkey_ 16 hr ago +1
The LED company is in the US. If Ford wants to buy BYD in China, can the chinese government block the sale ?
1
Seething-Angry 1 day ago +2
How can the US do this?
2
Kalthiria_Shines 1 day ago +16
The same way the EU needs to sign off on mergers and acquisitions Microsoft does. You're subject to the regulations of places where you do business.
16
_DanielC_ 1 day ago +2
I'm 100% that they made breakthrough and they want to sell the old one.
2
Abject_Rhubarb_3430 22 hr ago +1
How can Trumplstiltskin block a Dutch transaction?
1
SeeMarkFly 1 day ago +1
Too big to fail is ALSO too big to care. Well, they DO care about those quarterly profit reports.
1
Zealousideal_Amount8 1 day ago -15
How does America have the right to block a deal they aren’t involved in?
-15
IncidentalIncidence 1 day ago +15
well it's because they are involved in it
15
SneakyFire23 1 day ago +20
Same way the EU regulates American companies.
20
apoca1ypse12 13 hr ago
good!
0
← Back to Board