No, the President who always tells the truth told us it was total obliteration.
1576
toamnacriMar 28, 2026
+454
100% of one third was OBLITERATED
454
mike_pantsMar 28, 2026
+124
"Also please help us but we dont need help because we don't need anyone because we won the war and also we're sending 10,000 more troops and also I picked out these curtains zzzzzzzz."
124
Canuck-In-TOMar 29, 2026
+31
“Oh look. A sharpie!!!”
31
todumbtorealizeMar 29, 2026
+8
"OH damn I crapped my pants again."
8
ForeverFingersMar 29, 2026
+12
"Also, where's my statue -shart- zzzzzzzz."
12
toamnacriMar 28, 2026
+18
Just how demented this would sound if it wasn’t true!
18
Suheil-got-your-backMar 29, 2026
+20
No, see according to hegseth, there are no weapons left at all in Iran, if not for those 2/3. Its fully defenseless. If not for those 2/3. Hormuz also fully passable and 100% open… if not for those drones and missiles.
20
WJM_3Mar 29, 2026
+11
60% of the time, it works … every time
11
Lukin4Mar 29, 2026
+9
You just know Trump wears... Sex Predator
9
whizbangappsMar 28, 2026
+5
Totally?
5
toamnacriMar 29, 2026
+5
“Mostly”
5
4DollarsALBMar 28, 2026
+84
Trump lied but this headline is also extremely misleading.
>About a third of Tehran’s missiles have been destroyed, and another third was likely to be damaged or buried in underground tunnels and bunkers, the report suggested. A similar assessment was made about the country’s drone arsenal.
If you include damage to launchers their ability to attack is severely degraded and the headline is really meant to convey otherwise
84
LegsAndArmsAndTorsoMar 28, 2026
+37
Not only that but: missile_stock_pile = built_missiles - launched_missiles - destroyed_missiles
37
SeaworthinessSome454Mar 29, 2026
+21
I am shocked to see legitimate thought put into a comment in Listnook. Bravo for not letting the propaganda-esque headlines win
21
BehemothheekMar 29, 2026
+7
Also +supplied\_missiles, courtesy of China/Russia
7
tigersharkwushen_Mar 29, 2026
+10
Their drone launcher is literally just a slightly incline platform. They could launch drones from an angled dinner table. It makes no sense to say their drone launchers are destroyed.
10
ZasdfUnrealMar 29, 2026
+8
The people who know how to operate the launchers are mostly dead.
8
FuckDarthDoritoMar 28, 2026
+4
And so is your comment. To me, it seems like your comment is attempting to convey that since they’ve lost 66% of their arsenal, there’s not much left.
> The report, based on five people familiar with US intelligence, suggests that while most of Iran’s missiles are immediately inaccessible, **the country still has a sizeable stockpile**.
4
Little-Stage1948Mar 28, 2026
+19
Also also have to be able to launch them. Each time they do, it's another launcher lost, which is why they're more selective now.
19
of_no_real_opinionMar 29, 2026
+6
I have a small inkling they do not understand what the word obliterated means
6
EffReddit420Mar 29, 2026
+1
Thats why this war which will last 2-3 more weeks is over
1
Strict-Square456Mar 29, 2026
+1
Total obliteration of 100% of 30%.
1
SnakeOilerMar 29, 2026
+1
why am I not surprised that trump lied?
1
devindranMar 29, 2026
+1
Yes, but they unobliterated 2/3 of it susequently. With nothing but duct tape and superglue.
1
Relative_Drop3216Mar 29, 2026
+1
Totally means all of the 4 they can see
1
ButterscotchOk5339Mar 29, 2026
+1
Apparently, and according to the US government, obliterated means someone can still dig it up.
1
thejuvaMar 29, 2026
+1
Trump’s ministry of truth…
1
tormentnexusMar 28, 2026
+568
Soooo when will this special military operation actually end? Putin found out the hardest part of a 3 day war is the 1st 4 years.
568
Dramatic-Shape5574Mar 28, 2026
+123
When Tangerine Palpatine feels like it
123
HerbaciousTeaMar 29, 2026
+48
Nah, that's why this is extra special stupid. Trump doesn't get to choose when this ends. This only ends when *Iran* wants it to end. They're the ones bordering a vital economic chokepoint with the ability to threaten it for as long as they want.
48
Enlightened_GardenerMar 29, 2026
+30
Ohhh they haven’t figured this out yet, have they ? With the Houthis online now, the West is no longer even faintly in charge of the world’s oil supply.
I’m in Australia. The State govts are making public transport free, and everyone who can afford it is buying a Chinese EV. Completely ironic that the Age of Oil has been brought to a close by a conservative american administration.
30
shooshkebabMar 29, 2026
+5
And a massive boost to Chinese manufacturing industry technology and trade...ev cars, solar panels, soft power etc
5
rimshot99Mar 29, 2026
+7
The excursion is very complete. Just 4 more weeks.
7
tigersharkwushen_Mar 29, 2026
+3
He will be in office just three more years.
3
johnniewelkerMar 28, 2026
+6
Likely with clear war crimes. If Iran doesn’t negotiate with US - accept their demands essentially - I can see Trump getting upset and pushing for war-crime like actions.
If these don’t work, we will have troops. Trump is too ego driven to not want to save face.
6
Corrup7ioNMar 29, 2026
+1
The first 4 years are definitely the hardest part of the first four years. The 5th year is likely to be even harder
1
JohnnySmithe81Mar 29, 2026
+1
TBH I'm expecting Trump to declare victory, pick up his toys and go home then tell the world it's their problem before too long.
1
ZuparoebannMar 29, 2026
+1
It's already won, that's why Trump is sending thousands of troops to celebrate
1
Spare_Advisor_1464Mar 28, 2026
+277
While technically accurate, this is sort of a misleading headline. As the article says, 1/3rd is believed to be destroyed and another 1/3rd is inaccessible because they’re damaged or buried under rubble underground from the bombing.
So that is 2/3rds of Iran’s missiles that have been taken off the board, so to speak. I know that’s not the same as what Trump said either which was “they have very few rockets left”.
277
CircumspectCapybaraMar 29, 2026
+49
It's not even the missiles that matter, it's the transport erector launchers, and US intel has it at hundreds destroyed, representing the majority of their TELs. Which is very sensible because the US and Israel have local air superiority (though not air supremacy) over much of the country and excellent ISR, so anything that pops its head up its gonna get bonked. The effect is ballistic missile launch volume is down over 90% since the opening days of the war.
Of course, it's not the end of the story, since allied interceptor stockpiles are down too.
49
Guy_with_NumbersMar 29, 2026
+13
That's also quite misleading.
> It's not even the missiles that matter, it's the transport erector launchers, and US intel has it at hundreds destroyed, representing the majority of their TELs.
70% of their launchers "neutralized", roughly in line with 2/3rd of their missiles being taken out of commission.
> Which is very sensible because the US and Israel have local air superiority (though not air supremacy) over much of the country and excellent ISR, so anything that pops its head up its gonna get bonked. The effect is ballistic missile launch volume is down over 90% since the opening days of the war.
The reduction in launches is largely because US/Israel has targeted weapon/launcher stores that they already knew about. Air superiority/supremacy isn't that relevant here, because Iran is too big for US/Israel to always have something ready to respond to launches.
This issue with Iran's size is one of the many reasons why starting a war with Iran was off the table before Trump came around. This is why the reduction in launches has tapered off significantly, instead of being steadily cut down to zero.
13
Eazy-EidMar 28, 2026
+81
And then you have the launchers that are being taken out as well. That 1/3 missile stockpile is useless if you can't launch them.
81
_HISTMar 29, 2026
+10
And even more useless when your command centers are in ruins
10
Thog78Mar 29, 2026
+37
So far we see missiles fly though.
37
Nose-NuggetsMar 29, 2026
+29
My understanding is a 90ish% drop in launches. It was something like 400 a day when it started, it was down to 40 a day by day 10, and less than 10 a day now.
29
Thog78Mar 29, 2026
+5
Thanks, I didn't have the numbers, just saw the videos kept coming. If that really reflects the reduction of their capacity, sounds like they're cooked.
5
ghost396Mar 29, 2026
+4
Yeah, articles like this are very suspect because these charts are well sourced and easy to package for a full picture for what's happening, and it tells a very different story than this post. So why is world news getting tons of posts titled like this one all of a sudden?
4
RiPPeR69420Mar 29, 2026
+9
The launchers aren't hard to make. Especially the containerized ones, which are rigged up out of a standard shipping container. As long as Iran has the ability to lob a missile or a drone at a ship in the straits the risk of transit outweighs the reward, if Iran has declared them closed. The US and Israel can only suppress that ability by flying large numbers of combat sorties, which aren't c****, and that ops tempo can't be maintained indefinitely. Modern combat aircraft need lots of maintenance. Plus Iran still has production facilities. I'm betting Iran can outlast the US and Israel on this one.
9
tes_kittyMar 29, 2026
+7
You still need to make them which takes time, people and material, some of it specialized (hydraulics). And every time a launcher gets destroyed, you have a good chance of also losing trained personel and special equipment you can't easily replace.
7
chuloredditMar 29, 2026
+38
Also, you kill the archer not the arrows. Their launch systems are being blasted
38
_HISTMar 29, 2026
+16
With no means of delivery and no command to give orders might as well be cool set pieces
16
uberclontMar 29, 2026
+7
Iran has been striking Israel for the last 24 hours. I don’t think they are diminished yet.
7
Total_War_6757Mar 29, 2026
+7
Even if they had 2 rockets left they'd still be able to bomb Tel Aviv.
7
Gen_Constant_MaybeMar 29, 2026
+3
Yeah, from what I understand, it’s much more simple to just blow up the launch systems and the skilled operators.
3
Nose-NuggetsMar 29, 2026
+7
Someone watches Ryan McBeth :)
7
No_Iron_8087Mar 28, 2026
+22
The reality is, the ones that are “inaccessible” are presumed inaccessible. How could you possible even gauge that without observing on the ground?
Are they presuming there are only two entrances to these facilities? Are they assuming that the Iranians were unprepared for such strikes? I cannot believe a nation that has been preparing for this war for 40 years, stockpiled their missiles without considering a bombing campaign could prevent access to them.
Further, these numbers are kind of redundant when you don’t know how many they’ve got. “90% of launchers are down”, but we don’t know the number they have, so 90% of the ones we know of, which could very well be 10% of actual launchers. Same with the missiles, 1/3 out but 1/3 of what? The presumed number you believe they may have? The decentralised nature of the regime means intelligence has to infiltrate every IRGC compound in every province, and get access to missile bunkers to gain such knowledge. I don’t think it’s accurate to extrapolate a number from only a handful of bunker visits and propaganda videos
22
professorzaiusMar 29, 2026
+4
Agree, and as you point out logically, removing 1/3rd of a big number still leaves a big number 🤣
4
Reasonable-Owl-232Mar 28, 2026
+7
My biggest criticism of Trump is he summarises complex answers with single lines, which causes more confusion.
Between 1/3 being destroyed, another 1/3 inaccessible, and the other 1/3 being difficult to use and launch, effectively Iran have few rockets available to make meaningful damage. Trump has grossly oversimplified the real answer, although he is more or less correct in terms of Irans practical ability to launch rockets.
If I had 100 $1 coins, and 33 were destroyed, 33 were buried underground, and the other 33 were under guard of wild dogs, I'd still have $67 but practically speaking I'd only have $1 to spend.
7
MarkLVinesMar 28, 2026
+34
> My biggest criticism of Trump is he summarizes complex answers with single lines,
Of all the criticisms you might summon, that’s the biggest, you say.
34
theartificialkidMar 29, 2026
+16
I’ve always said the thing that bothers me the most about actual rapist, felon, draft dodging warhawk, fraudster, adjudicated conman and charity thief Donald Trump is the way he simplifies things.
16
thereoncewasahatMar 28, 2026
-5
They have no idea how many are left.
They will have stock piled many underground; waiting to use them to hit the straight and the islands if taken.
They have been preparing for exactly this scenario for decades.
America, clearly, has not.
Good luck to the Marines, they're going to need it.
-5
Amori_A_SploogeMar 28, 2026
+32
Obviously you didn't read the article.
32
trikuza23Mar 28, 2026
+12
Anytime they’re used, they get targeted…
12
dumcow2003Mar 28, 2026
+13
To suggest that the Marines hasn't been preparing, or that the fact the irgc keeping munition underground isn't well known is the dumbest shit ever.
They know its underground thats why they bomb underground facilities, to either bury it or destroy it
The marines are one of the most lethal forces in the world, you can be prepared but they will most probably kill you much more than die.
Now add the a10s, f-35s, f-15s, f-16s f-18s, bombers drones, warships, and helicopters, while Iranian defense systems are severely degraded, before the marines even set foot on an island they could drop literally a million pounds of explosives on it.
They don't want to fight in the mainland they are fighting in an island that is around 6km , the Iranians simply can't defend it.
When push comes to shove They will try to use asymmetric war and hit other oil production sites and kill as many marines as possible That's it
13
HamasDaddyOnFireMar 28, 2026
+42
But what percentage of *launchers*? Missiles are useless without the means to deliver them.
42
Nose-NuggetsMar 29, 2026
+31
Estimates are 75% destroyed. And given the change in launch cadence vs day 1, that seems to be a reasonable estimate.
31
HamasDaddyOnFireMar 29, 2026
+10
I hear higher, but cadence is key. Saturation is the game, and they can't effectively do it consistently anymore.
10
Nose-NuggetsMar 29, 2026
+6
Yeah, there's no guesswork about the cadence of missile launches, and that alone suggests some significant degradation in ability.
6
KE55Mar 28, 2026
+403
The US still has intelligence?
403
ElZane87Mar 28, 2026
+141
The biggliest intelligence.
141
TheSchlafMar 28, 2026
+47
CIA analysts, with tears in their eyes, are saying "only the best intelligence".
47
Common-Relation5915Mar 28, 2026
+11
But not any of the analysts who covered Russian intelligence and military operations, Tulsi Gabbard fired every single one of them.
11
very_anonymousMar 28, 2026
+16
Intelligence like no one has ever seen before.
16
HappySlappyManMar 28, 2026
+6
Low intelligence is still technically intelligence
6
J-uanpiMar 28, 2026
+9
The most powerful, and amazing intelligence agencies of the ENTIRE WORLD, the only one that can achieve stuff that traitors of Europe only dream with. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
/s
9
JonsezMar 28, 2026
+2
Grab them by their intelligence, they just let you when your a pedo
2
49orthMar 28, 2026
+2
Not in its current administration
2
EquivalentDetail5043Mar 28, 2026
+2
The lunatics are running the asylum.
2
ImbendoMar 28, 2026
+135
So once we destroy all of their missiles and leave…..won’t they just build more and then be in the same position they were before except now they hate us even more and know that they can close the strait in practice and not just in theory?
135
junkyard_robotMar 28, 2026
+69
I mean, it seems like the US and Israel have destroyed 1/3 of Iran's weapons by having their bases ancmd cities hit by Iranian missiles and drones.
69
PlaneswalkerHuxleyMar 28, 2026
+47
Successfully intercepted by a building.
47
_aviemore_Mar 28, 2026
+15
Us also making sure Iran doesn't destroy world economy via high gas prices by ... lifting decade old sanctions on Iran. That'll show'em!
15
StephenHunterUKMar 28, 2026
+27
It would take time for them to rebuild the factories that have also been targeted.
27
milo_pengMar 28, 2026
+6
And then what? At best, it bought 5 years to a decade.
With the same people in charge, the only lesson they will learn from this is just to double down and go on hard mode.
6
LoveCreative1579Mar 28, 2026
+6
Except it turns out a lot of the factories are located in other countries
6
ImjustANewSneakerMar 28, 2026
+21
Lmfao this doesn’t even make sense, no one is shipping ballistic missiles to them
21
nevergoingtocomment3Mar 28, 2026
+9
Russia
9
LoveCreative1579Mar 28, 2026
+3
[https://mei.edu/publication/irans-drone-factory-tajikistan/](https://mei.edu/publication/irans-drone-factory-tajikistan/) this but missile parts and assembly.
3
__dying__Mar 28, 2026
+1
Except that they will be more angry this time when they rebuild.
1
Cereal_GrapeistMar 28, 2026
+10
Hmm you're probably right. The logical conclusion to that would be that we can't afford any half measures.
10
__dying__Mar 28, 2026
+2
Good luck overthrowing the Persian empire in their mountain fortress. I presume you'll be enlisting for the ground invasion.
2
xmuskorxMar 28, 2026
+27
What percentage of LAUNCHERS were destroyed?
Also 1/3 of missiles in a month is pretty good.
27
beekeeper1981Mar 29, 2026
+5
I think it depends if the next third is as easily found and destroyed.
5
toeknnMar 28, 2026
+46
And what % of iranian missiles have been fired?
For the downvoters its a simpe equation to calculate remaining iranian mumitions.
First you start with what they had pre war
Then you subtract what theyve fired
Then you subtract what has been destroyed
Then you subtract what is unusuable and unretrievble
Then You add in monthly production.
Probably not a favourable equation for Iran.
46
shooshkebabMar 29, 2026
+3
Sadly, they only need one drone every month, fired from the back of some camel drawn cart to keep the shipping closed for years.
3
MiserableTennis6546Mar 29, 2026
+3
And you of course know perfectly how many missiles and launchers they had before the war.
3
Cav829Mar 28, 2026
+44
I dunno, maybe it was a bad idea getting rid of so many people at our various agencies who knew what they were doing.
44
NadanteMar 29, 2026
+11
But it was necessary because competent people are not sycophantic. They think critically. We have to convince them to do stuff with morals and ethics and stuff. That's too difficult. We want blind loyalty. We need that to bring back Jesus and end the world with Israel!
11
Chef_The_FerretMar 29, 2026
+3
The launchers matter more than the missiles
3
Drak_is_RightMar 29, 2026
+5
The title is highly misleading. MISSILES AND DRONES. Vast majority of ballistic missiles have been used, destroyed, or buried. Iran has fired off 2500 ballistic missiles I believe (which put a major dent in their stockpile) then another like 1000 in the Israel war.
Far LESS of the drone stockpile has been destroyed, buried, or used.
5
CBT7commanderMar 28, 2026
+12
That doesn’t matter. Priority will always be launchers.
Also, 2 thirds of the missile stockpile being taken out isn’t bad (read the article)
12
PanicOverNothingMar 28, 2026
+4
I am not doubting that they could have destroyed a third of Iran' missiles and that another third have been at least damaged.
but this article leaves a lot of questions on the table.
How have they determined how many missiles Iran has left?
Since the war started how fast can they replenish the stock of missiles and drones?
Could they have been given any missiles or could they have missiles coming from their allies Russia and China?
Also afaik the 'missile cities' are also factories able to produce more missiles (I could be wrong on this).
The guardian article makes reference to a reuters article, however in the reuters article I was able to find (I will link below) a US official says it is difficult to gauge how many missiles Iran has left or has stockpiled.
Reuters article:
[https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/us-can-only-confirm-about-third-irans-missile-arsenal-destroyed-sources-say-2026-03-27/](https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/us-can-only-confirm-about-third-irans-missile-arsenal-destroyed-sources-say-2026-03-27/)
4
Practical-Heat-1009Mar 28, 2026
+6
Wow, the Guardian with another intentionally misleading headline. Surely it’s just an honest mistake and not something they do any time the US or Israel is mentioned.
6
AkrymirMar 29, 2026
+2
30% destroyed and 30% buried… but that’s drones and missiles. When you count just the long range ballistic missiles, 90+% are destroyed/buried.
2
Winter_Criticism_236Mar 29, 2026
+4
Translation - we have zero idea how many missiles they have and they sure keep firing them..
4
stonertearMar 28, 2026
+5
12 weeks instead of 4 weeks, I can live with that.
Key word here is missiles, not launchers.
5
MiserableTennis6546Mar 29, 2026
+4
Make that 120 weeks.
4
CodeMonkeyPhotoMar 29, 2026
+5
Well the US had certainly destroyed 2/3rds of its intelligence.
5
FUCKYOUINYOURFACEMar 29, 2026
+2
Houthi’s are about to get hit.
2
BluehibiscusEmpireMar 29, 2026
+2
How can public government statements and intelligence reports be so different?
2
JunkbaIIMar 29, 2026
+2
how do they get shot without launchers, precious?
2
TheAstburyMar 29, 2026
+2
Hard to destroy missiles if you are busy bombing schools and civilian infrastructure
2
C_arpetMar 28, 2026
+5
The US has only destroyed about a third of Iran’s missile and drone arsenal after a month of its war against Iran which aimed to degrade the country’s ballistic missile capabilities, according to a report by Reuters.
About a third of Tehran’s missiles have been destroyed, and another third was likely to be damaged or buried in underground tunnels and bunkers, the report suggested. A similar assessment was made about the country’s drone arsenal.
The report, based on five people familiar with US intelligence, suggests that while most of Iran’s missiles are immediately inaccessible, the country still has a sizeable stockpile.
That contradicts Donald Trump’s statement on Thursday that Tehran had “very few rockets left” and statements from other US officials that the war has eliminated its ballistic missile capabilities.
Iranian officials see its ballistic missile programme as a key deterrent, particularly given the vast military superiority of the US and Israel, which is within reach of its arsenal and views it as a direct threat.
Iran has used ballistic missiles and drones to devastating effect over the last month, continuing to pound Israel and key energy and public infrastructure in the Gulf, and inflicting huge damage on the global economy.
The US and Israel have said degrading Iran’s ballistic missile capacity is one of the chief aims of the war. IWashington has deployed thousands of more troops to the Middle East in recent days as the administration reportedly mulls a ground operation in Kharg island with the aim of reopening the strait of Hormuz.
Trump said on Thursday: “The problem with the strait is this: Let’s say we do a great job. We say we got 99% [of their missiles]. 1% is unacceptable, because 1% is a missile going into the hull of a ship that cost a billion dollars.”
Israel has made ballistic missile caches and launchers one of the primary targets of its aerial campaign in Iran. It says it has “neutralised” 335 or 70% of Tehran’s missile launchers. Iran has distributed its launchers across the country in an effort to evade Israeli detection and airstrikes.
The number of launches has declined as Israel and the US continue to their bombing campaign, but missiles have still managed to hit Israel and the Gulf as interceptors also run out. Israel, the US and Gulf states have spent billions and expended critical interceptor stocks to block Iranian missile barrages.
A US official, speaking anonymously, suggested that it would be impossible to assess Iran’s missile stockpile as much of it was stored underground. “I don’t know if we’ll ever have an accurate number,” they said.
Iran fired 15 missiles and 11 drones at the United Arab Emirates on Thursday, according to the UAE defence ministry.
The US defence secretary, Pete Hegseth, said the vast tunnel network created an extra challenge in destroying Iran’s missile stockpile, but said the US military would continue regardless.
“We are hunting them down methodically, ruthlessly and overwhelmingly, like no other military in the world can do, and the results speak for themselves,” he said earlier this month.
5
dillpiccololMar 28, 2026
+18
The title of the article is misleading. The article also suggests another 1/3rd have been buried.
18
run_midnightMar 28, 2026
+22
They may have up to 2/3 of their missiles but [they have less than 40% of their launchers left](https://share.google/zlDWmSUs5UAeIGIfL)
22
StephenHunterUKMar 28, 2026
+10
Yes. You've got to physically put the missiles onto the launchers, fuel them up in most cases, drive to a launch point, raise the missile to firing position and launch... without being detected by a US or Israeli aircraft.
Unlike Iraq, which has wide open desert expanse, Iran is pretty mountainous, which limits the area to cover... and also slows down deployment.
10
smittehMar 28, 2026
+2
What's that saying, something like 63% of all statistics have a 47% chance of being 29% factually inaccurate, 81% of the time?
2
Kranken_DeHoggeMar 28, 2026
+2
>A US official, speaking anonymously, suggested that it would be impossible to assess Iran’s missile stockpile as much of it was stored underground. “I don’t know if we’ll ever have an accurate number,” they said.
how do we know how many launchers they have? and do we know of their capacity to rebuild launchers?
2
Man_under_Bridge420Mar 28, 2026
+10
How do we know about the missiles?
10
EssaielMar 28, 2026
+3
Surely the launchers are the more important target? Most of their missiles will be in secure bunkers.
Which will only ever be of any use with the launchers.
3
paradigm_shift2027Mar 29, 2026
+4
NO, NO, NO! President Trump said we have totally destroyed their military capability! The greatest president in the history of planet earth would not lie.
4
NerupeMar 29, 2026
+3
Have they let the Iranians know?
3
AusTex2019Mar 29, 2026
+1
They obliterated the intelligence community and agencies so they are just making it up.
1
rightsidedownMar 29, 2026
+2
"Intelligence Suggest", just stop, no one knows. This is all wild speculation either way, and we've been down this road before. Iran will either run out of missiles and some analyst who did a lot of guesswork with little information will be correct or they will keep shooting missiles and another analyst making another guess on little information will be the correct one.
2
gigorbustMar 29, 2026
+2
Sorry, Intelli… what? Never until this year did it become clear how differently words are defined; "intelligence" is a stretch.
2
[deleted]Mar 28, 2026
-1
[deleted]
-1
HonestMadridFanMar 28, 2026
+3
any day now
3
goflykite-Mar 28, 2026
+2
The reason no one ever attacked Iran isn’t because of their military. Their military is a joke. The real consequences is the potential for a global recession because of the straight of Hormuz. It’s impossible to protect ships going through the straight. Iran still holds all of the cards here.
2
SnooChickens1534Mar 28, 2026
+2
Is that the same intelligence that said if you wipe out the leadership the people will rise up and iran will be free, or the same intelligence that said they werent a threat to the USA but Trump said they were 2 weeks away from a nuclear bomb. Its hard to believe the lies that's coming out of America . But if it is truly a third of Irans missiles , then they've 2 months supply left . If we cant get a ceasefire by then , the global economy is going to crash .
2
clipse270Mar 28, 2026
+1
Who’s going to tell Trump
1
ynys_redMar 28, 2026
+1
So Iran still has the potential to create A LOT of problems?
1
ShiroliciousMar 29, 2026
+1
Israel seems to be giving much more accurate information when it comes to this kind of stuff atleast.
1
macross1984Mar 29, 2026
+1
Zelenskyy will be more than willing to help (for a price).
1
Ulrich453Mar 29, 2026
+1
I almost exactly might know that we’ve probably taken care of destroying nearly if not atleast a few of all of Irans missiles
1
CircumspectCapybaraMar 29, 2026
+1
It's not the missiles that matter, it's the transport erector launchers, and US intel has it at hundreds destroyed. The effect is ballistic missile launch volume is down over 90% since the opening days of the war.
Of course, it's not the end of the story, since interceptor stockpiles are down too.
1
die_in_a_fire_redditMar 29, 2026
+1
Is it bizarre that any random civilian like myself can see by the hour updates on the military movements in an emergent conflict?
It had to be false, right? No way what they are saying an be accurate.
1
greenman5252Mar 29, 2026
+1
That’s what “totally obliterated” means?
1
polygonalopportunistMar 29, 2026
+1
Totally destroyed
1
Kind_Silver_1921Mar 29, 2026
+1
Fake news it can only verify 1/3rd is destroyed because most of the sites they hit are underground
1
Iliker0cksMar 29, 2026
+1
This must be an old headline because this war was over weekend ago.
1
Bitter_Procedure260Mar 29, 2026
+1
This and the war in Ukraine remind me of WWI, where all the old world generals were using outdated strategies and their troops were getting decimated as a result. Countries like Canada performed comparatively better because their inexperienced generals had no preconceptions. Today we are seeing last centuries powers throwing billions of dollars worth of equipment at drone armies that might as well be infinite. The US can think what it wants, but Iran can dig in for years.
1
desanchoMar 29, 2026
+1
The word is totally obliterated, ok? They’re all totally obliterated….at least 1/3 of them.
1
journey01Mar 29, 2026
+1
It doesn't matter. I was told we won the war weeks ago.
1
Department-of-WarioMar 29, 2026
+1
Decades of preparation vs a whim.
1
ShakeMyHeadSadlyMar 29, 2026
+1
But we won?
1
bored_ryan2Mar 29, 2026
+1
Great, so they’ll put US boots on the ground who will get their asses torn up by missiles with cluster warheads and an actual significant Iranian ground army.
1
Mjr3Mar 29, 2026
+1
Are we including the missies destroyed upon impact with our bases?
1
ken_the_boxerMar 29, 2026
+1
Neew shipments arriving from Russia and China for sure
1
Princess_ActualMar 29, 2026
+1
So another three months.
1
BisjouxMar 29, 2026
+1
I guess maths isn’t this administration’s strong point. 33% isn’t the same as 100%.
It’s both a surprise and not really a surprise that they went to war with no actual plan.
1
fanatic_tarantulaMar 29, 2026
+1
Doesnt really matters how many missiles you destroy, aslong as you destroy the majority of the launchers.
1
OreokoMar 29, 2026
+1
Third of of missiles capacity in huge country like Iran that hide it's missiles under mountains in under a month is a huge achievement. Why people here talk like it's a bad thing?
1
Head_Summer2052Mar 29, 2026
+1
And Russia (Putin and his future successors like it, a lot!)
1
HarithBKMar 29, 2026
+1
i mean that is pretty good figures considering the fact the US didn't go after missile storage sites but rather missile launchers and transport.
it doesn't really matter if you have a million missiles if you only have 10 launchers and if you launch a single missile that launcher will get taken out. the effect is you only have 10 missiles left.
this isn't me moving the goal post or anything this is what they US army said they were going for since day one.
the issue is this idea hasn't kept up with how modern warfare has evolved with the war in Ukraine. Drone warfare means the objective a missile does can be done with by a single person anywhere.
this blunder would not have happened had the US been more involved in working with and sending arms to Ukraine. there is a reason Sweden has been so invested and willing to send arms to Ukraine and make deals for factories etc. you need to take part in conflicts where modern proper armies meet or you will be left behind in the rapid development of arms that happens on the frontline.
Iran has been very involved on the arms front for Russia in that conflict and changed there focus to drones for themselves.
156 Comments