· 156 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Mar 28, 2026 at 10:24 PM

US has destroyed only a third of Iran’s missiles, intelligence suggests

Posted by C_arpet


US has destroyed only a third of Iran’s missiles, intelligence suggests
the Guardian
US has destroyed only a third of Iran’s missiles, intelligence suggests
Reuters report contradicts Trump’s claims that Tehran’s arsenal has been largely wiped out Middle East crisis

🚩 Report this post

156 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
hutthuttindabutt Mar 28, 2026 +1576
No, the President who always tells the truth told us it was total obliteration.
1576
toamnacri Mar 28, 2026 +454
100% of one third was OBLITERATED
454
mike_pants Mar 28, 2026 +124
"Also please help us but we dont need help because we don't need anyone because we won the war and also we're sending 10,000 more troops and also I picked out these curtains zzzzzzzz."
124
Canuck-In-TO Mar 29, 2026 +31
“Oh look. A sharpie!!!”
31
todumbtorealize Mar 29, 2026 +8
"OH damn I crapped my pants again."
8
ForeverFingers Mar 29, 2026 +12
"Also, where's my statue -shart- zzzzzzzz."
12
toamnacri Mar 28, 2026 +18
Just how demented this would sound if it wasn’t true!
18
Suheil-got-your-back Mar 29, 2026 +20
No, see according to hegseth, there are no weapons left at all in Iran, if not for those 2/3. Its fully defenseless. If not for those 2/3. Hormuz also fully passable and 100% open… if not for those drones and missiles.
20
WJM_3 Mar 29, 2026 +11
60% of the time, it works … every time
11
Lukin4 Mar 29, 2026 +9
You just know Trump wears... Sex Predator
9
whizbangapps Mar 28, 2026 +5
Totally?
5
toamnacri Mar 29, 2026 +5
“Mostly”
5
4DollarsALB Mar 28, 2026 +84
Trump lied but this headline is also extremely misleading. >About a third of Tehran’s missiles have been destroyed, and another third was likely to be damaged or buried in underground tunnels and bunkers, the report suggested. A similar assessment was made about the country’s drone arsenal. If you include damage to launchers their ability to attack is severely degraded and the headline is really meant to convey otherwise
84
LegsAndArmsAndTorso Mar 28, 2026 +37
Not only that but: missile_stock_pile = built_missiles - launched_missiles - destroyed_missiles
37
SeaworthinessSome454 Mar 29, 2026 +21
I am shocked to see legitimate thought put into a comment in Listnook. Bravo for not letting the propaganda-esque headlines win
21
Behemothheek Mar 29, 2026 +7
Also +supplied\_missiles, courtesy of China/Russia
7
tigersharkwushen_ Mar 29, 2026 +10
Their drone launcher is literally just a slightly incline platform. They could launch drones from an angled dinner table. It makes no sense to say their drone launchers are destroyed.
10
ZasdfUnreal Mar 29, 2026 +8
The people who know how to operate the launchers are mostly dead.
8
FuckDarthDorito Mar 28, 2026 +4
And so is your comment. To me, it seems like your comment is attempting to convey that since they’ve lost 66% of their arsenal, there’s not much left. > The report, based on five people familiar with US intelligence, suggests that while most of Iran’s missiles are immediately inaccessible, **the country still has a sizeable stockpile**.
4
Little-Stage1948 Mar 28, 2026 +19
Also also have to be able to launch them. Each time they do, it's another launcher lost, which is why they're more selective now.
19
of_no_real_opinion Mar 29, 2026 +6
I have a small inkling they do not understand what the word obliterated means
6
EffReddit420 Mar 29, 2026 +1
Thats why this war which will last 2-3 more weeks is over
1
Strict-Square456 Mar 29, 2026 +1
Total obliteration of 100% of 30%.
1
SnakeOiler Mar 29, 2026 +1
why am I not surprised that trump lied?
1
devindran Mar 29, 2026 +1
Yes, but they unobliterated 2/3 of it susequently. With nothing but duct tape and superglue.
1
Relative_Drop3216 Mar 29, 2026 +1
Totally means all of the 4 they can see
1
ButterscotchOk5339 Mar 29, 2026 +1
Apparently, and according to the US government, obliterated means someone can still dig it up.
1
thejuva Mar 29, 2026 +1
Trump’s ministry of truth…
1
tormentnexus Mar 28, 2026 +568
Soooo when will this special military operation actually end? Putin found out the hardest part of a 3 day war is the 1st 4 years.
568
Dramatic-Shape5574 Mar 28, 2026 +123
When Tangerine Palpatine feels like it
123
HerbaciousTea Mar 29, 2026 +48
Nah, that's why this is extra special stupid. Trump doesn't get to choose when this ends. This only ends when *Iran* wants it to end. They're the ones bordering a vital economic chokepoint with the ability to threaten it for as long as they want.
48
Enlightened_Gardener Mar 29, 2026 +30
Ohhh they haven’t figured this out yet, have they ? With the Houthis online now, the West is no longer even faintly in charge of the world’s oil supply. I’m in Australia. The State govts are making public transport free, and everyone who can afford it is buying a Chinese EV. Completely ironic that the Age of Oil has been brought to a close by a conservative american administration.
30
shooshkebab Mar 29, 2026 +5
And a massive boost to Chinese manufacturing industry technology and trade...ev cars, solar panels, soft power etc
5
rimshot99 Mar 29, 2026 +7
The excursion is very complete. Just 4 more weeks.
7
tigersharkwushen_ Mar 29, 2026 +3
He will be in office just three more years.
3
johnniewelker Mar 28, 2026 +6
Likely with clear war crimes. If Iran doesn’t negotiate with US - accept their demands essentially - I can see Trump getting upset and pushing for war-crime like actions. If these don’t work, we will have troops. Trump is too ego driven to not want to save face.
6
Corrup7ioN Mar 29, 2026 +1
The first 4 years are definitely the hardest part of the first four years. The 5th year is likely to be even harder
1
JohnnySmithe81 Mar 29, 2026 +1
TBH I'm expecting Trump to declare victory, pick up his toys and go home then tell the world it's their problem before too long.
1
Zuparoebann Mar 29, 2026 +1
It's already won, that's why Trump is sending thousands of troops to celebrate
1
Spare_Advisor_1464 Mar 28, 2026 +277
While technically accurate, this is sort of a misleading headline. As the article says, 1/3rd is believed to be destroyed and another 1/3rd is inaccessible because they’re damaged or buried under rubble underground from the bombing. So that is 2/3rds of Iran’s missiles that have been taken off the board, so to speak. I know that’s not the same as what Trump said either which was “they have very few rockets left”.
277
CircumspectCapybara Mar 29, 2026 +49
It's not even the missiles that matter, it's the transport erector launchers, and US intel has it at hundreds destroyed, representing the majority of their TELs. Which is very sensible because the US and Israel have local air superiority (though not air supremacy) over much of the country and excellent ISR, so anything that pops its head up its gonna get bonked. The effect is ballistic missile launch volume is down over 90% since the opening days of the war. Of course, it's not the end of the story, since allied interceptor stockpiles are down too.
49
Guy_with_Numbers Mar 29, 2026 +13
That's also quite misleading. > It's not even the missiles that matter, it's the transport erector launchers, and US intel has it at hundreds destroyed, representing the majority of their TELs. 70% of their launchers "neutralized", roughly in line with 2/3rd of their missiles being taken out of commission. > Which is very sensible because the US and Israel have local air superiority (though not air supremacy) over much of the country and excellent ISR, so anything that pops its head up its gonna get bonked. The effect is ballistic missile launch volume is down over 90% since the opening days of the war. The reduction in launches is largely because US/Israel has targeted weapon/launcher stores that they already knew about. Air superiority/supremacy isn't that relevant here, because Iran is too big for US/Israel to always have something ready to respond to launches. This issue with Iran's size is one of the many reasons why starting a war with Iran was off the table before Trump came around. This is why the reduction in launches has tapered off significantly, instead of being steadily cut down to zero.
13
Eazy-Eid Mar 28, 2026 +81
And then you have the launchers that are being taken out as well. That 1/3 missile stockpile is useless if you can't launch them.
81
_HIST Mar 29, 2026 +10
And even more useless when your command centers are in ruins
10
Thog78 Mar 29, 2026 +37
So far we see missiles fly though.
37
Nose-Nuggets Mar 29, 2026 +29
My understanding is a 90ish% drop in launches. It was something like 400 a day when it started, it was down to 40 a day by day 10, and less than 10 a day now.
29
Thog78 Mar 29, 2026 +5
Thanks, I didn't have the numbers, just saw the videos kept coming. If that really reflects the reduction of their capacity, sounds like they're cooked.
5
ghost396 Mar 29, 2026 +4
Yeah, articles like this are very suspect because these charts are well sourced and easy to package for a full picture for what's happening, and it tells a very different story than this post. So why is world news getting tons of posts titled like this one all of a sudden?
4
RiPPeR69420 Mar 29, 2026 +9
The launchers aren't hard to make. Especially the containerized ones, which are rigged up out of a standard shipping container. As long as Iran has the ability to lob a missile or a drone at a ship in the straits the risk of transit outweighs the reward, if Iran has declared them closed. The US and Israel can only suppress that ability by flying large numbers of combat sorties, which aren't c****, and that ops tempo can't be maintained indefinitely. Modern combat aircraft need lots of maintenance. Plus Iran still has production facilities. I'm betting Iran can outlast the US and Israel on this one.
9
tes_kitty Mar 29, 2026 +7
You still need to make them which takes time, people and material, some of it specialized (hydraulics). And every time a launcher gets destroyed, you have a good chance of also losing trained personel and special equipment you can't easily replace.
7
chuloreddit Mar 29, 2026 +38
Also, you kill the archer not the arrows. Their launch systems are being blasted
38
_HIST Mar 29, 2026 +16
With no means of delivery and no command to give orders might as well be cool set pieces
16
uberclont Mar 29, 2026 +7
Iran has been striking Israel for the last 24 hours. I don’t think they are diminished yet. 
7
Total_War_6757 Mar 29, 2026 +7
Even if they had 2 rockets left they'd still be able to bomb Tel Aviv.
7
Gen_Constant_Maybe Mar 29, 2026 +3
Yeah, from what I understand, it’s much more simple to just blow up the launch systems and the skilled operators.
3
Nose-Nuggets Mar 29, 2026 +7
Someone watches Ryan McBeth :)
7
No_Iron_8087 Mar 28, 2026 +22
The reality is, the ones that are “inaccessible” are presumed inaccessible. How could you possible even gauge that without observing on the ground? Are they presuming there are only two entrances to these facilities? Are they assuming that the Iranians were unprepared for such strikes? I cannot believe a nation that has been preparing for this war for 40 years, stockpiled their missiles without considering a bombing campaign could prevent access to them. Further, these numbers are kind of redundant when you don’t know how many they’ve got. “90% of launchers are down”, but we don’t know the number they have, so 90% of the ones we know of, which could very well be 10% of actual launchers. Same with the missiles, 1/3 out but 1/3 of what? The presumed number you believe they may have? The decentralised nature of the regime means intelligence has to infiltrate every IRGC compound in every province, and get access to missile bunkers to gain such knowledge. I don’t think it’s accurate to extrapolate a number from only a handful of bunker visits and propaganda videos
22
professorzaius Mar 29, 2026 +4
Agree, and as you point out logically, removing 1/3rd of a big number still leaves a big number 🤣
4
Reasonable-Owl-232 Mar 28, 2026 +7
My biggest criticism of Trump is he summarises complex answers with single lines, which causes more confusion. Between 1/3 being destroyed, another 1/3 inaccessible, and the other 1/3 being difficult to use and launch, effectively Iran have few rockets available to make meaningful damage. Trump has grossly oversimplified the real answer, although he is more or less correct in terms of Irans practical ability to launch rockets. If I had 100 $1 coins, and 33 were destroyed, 33 were buried underground, and the other 33 were under guard of wild dogs, I'd still have $67 but practically speaking I'd only have $1 to spend.
7
MarkLVines Mar 28, 2026 +34
> My biggest criticism of Trump is he summarizes complex answers with single lines, Of all the criticisms you might summon, that’s the biggest, you say.
34
theartificialkid Mar 29, 2026 +16
I’ve always said the thing that bothers me the most about actual rapist, felon, draft dodging warhawk, fraudster, adjudicated conman and charity thief Donald Trump is the way he simplifies things.
16
thereoncewasahat Mar 28, 2026 -5
They have no idea how many are left. They will have stock piled many underground; waiting to use them to hit the straight and the islands if taken. They have been preparing for exactly this scenario for decades. America, clearly, has not. Good luck to the Marines, they're going to need it.
-5
Amori_A_Splooge Mar 28, 2026 +32
Obviously you didn't read the article.
32
trikuza23 Mar 28, 2026 +12
Anytime they’re used, they get targeted…
12
dumcow2003 Mar 28, 2026 +13
To suggest that the Marines hasn't been preparing, or that the fact the irgc keeping munition underground isn't well known is the dumbest shit ever. They know its underground thats why they bomb underground facilities, to either bury it or destroy it The marines are one of the most lethal forces in the world, you can be prepared but they will most probably kill you much more than die. Now add the a10s, f-35s, f-15s, f-16s f-18s, bombers drones, warships, and helicopters, while Iranian defense systems are severely degraded, before the marines even set foot on an island they could drop literally a million pounds of explosives on it. They don't want to fight in the mainland they are fighting in an island that is around 6km , the Iranians simply can't defend it. When push comes to shove They will try to use asymmetric war and hit other oil production sites and kill as many marines as possible That's it
13
HamasDaddyOnFire Mar 28, 2026 +42
But what percentage of *launchers*? Missiles are useless without the means to deliver them.
42
Nose-Nuggets Mar 29, 2026 +31
Estimates are 75% destroyed. And given the change in launch cadence vs day 1, that seems to be a reasonable estimate.
31
HamasDaddyOnFire Mar 29, 2026 +10
I hear higher, but cadence is key. Saturation is the game, and they can't effectively do it consistently anymore.
10
Nose-Nuggets Mar 29, 2026 +6
Yeah, there's no guesswork about the cadence of missile launches, and that alone suggests some significant degradation in ability.
6
KE55 Mar 28, 2026 +403
The US still has intelligence?
403
ElZane87 Mar 28, 2026 +141
The biggliest intelligence.
141
TheSchlaf Mar 28, 2026 +47
CIA analysts, with tears in their eyes, are saying "only the best intelligence".
47
Common-Relation5915 Mar 28, 2026 +11
But not any of the analysts who covered Russian intelligence and military operations, Tulsi Gabbard fired every single one of them.
11
very_anonymous Mar 28, 2026 +16
Intelligence like no one has ever seen before.
16
HappySlappyMan Mar 28, 2026 +6
Low intelligence is still technically intelligence
6
J-uanpi Mar 28, 2026 +9
The most powerful, and amazing intelligence agencies of the ENTIRE WORLD, the only one that can achieve stuff that traitors of Europe only dream with. Thank you for your attention to this matter. /s
9
Jonsez Mar 28, 2026 +2
Grab them by their intelligence, they just let you when your a pedo
2
49orth Mar 28, 2026 +2
Not in its current administration
2
EquivalentDetail5043 Mar 28, 2026 +2
The lunatics are running the asylum.
2
Imbendo Mar 28, 2026 +135
So once we destroy all of their missiles and leave…..won’t they just build more and then be in the same position they were before except now they hate us even more and know that they can close the strait in practice and not just in theory?
135
junkyard_robot Mar 28, 2026 +69
I mean, it seems like the US and Israel have destroyed 1/3 of Iran's weapons by having their bases ancmd cities hit by Iranian missiles and drones.
69
PlaneswalkerHuxley Mar 28, 2026 +47
Successfully intercepted by a building.
47
_aviemore_ Mar 28, 2026 +15
Us also making sure Iran doesn't destroy world economy via high gas prices by ... lifting decade old sanctions on Iran. That'll show'em! 
15
StephenHunterUK Mar 28, 2026 +27
It would take time for them to rebuild the factories that have also been targeted.
27
milo_peng Mar 28, 2026 +6
And then what? At best, it bought 5 years to a decade. With the same people in charge, the only lesson they will learn from this is just to double down and go on hard mode.
6
LoveCreative1579 Mar 28, 2026 +6
Except it turns out a lot of the factories are located in other countries
6
ImjustANewSneaker Mar 28, 2026 +21
Lmfao this doesn’t even make sense, no one is shipping ballistic missiles to them
21
nevergoingtocomment3 Mar 28, 2026 +9
Russia
9
LoveCreative1579 Mar 28, 2026 +3
[https://mei.edu/publication/irans-drone-factory-tajikistan/](https://mei.edu/publication/irans-drone-factory-tajikistan/) this but missile parts and assembly.
3
__dying__ Mar 28, 2026 +1
Except that they will be more angry this time when they rebuild.
1
Cereal_Grapeist Mar 28, 2026 +10
Hmm you're probably right. The logical conclusion to that would be that we can't afford any half measures.
10
__dying__ Mar 28, 2026 +2
Good luck overthrowing the Persian empire in their mountain fortress. I presume you'll be enlisting for the ground invasion.
2
xmuskorx Mar 28, 2026 +27
What percentage of LAUNCHERS were destroyed? Also 1/3 of missiles in a month is pretty good.
27
beekeeper1981 Mar 29, 2026 +5
I think it depends if the next third is as easily found and destroyed.
5
toeknn Mar 28, 2026 +46
And what % of iranian missiles have been fired? For the downvoters its a simpe equation to calculate remaining iranian mumitions. First you start with what they had pre war Then you subtract what theyve fired Then you subtract what has been destroyed Then you subtract what is unusuable and unretrievble Then You add in monthly production. Probably not a favourable equation for Iran.
46
shooshkebab Mar 29, 2026 +3
Sadly, they only need one drone every month, fired from the back of some camel drawn cart to keep the shipping closed for years.
3
MiserableTennis6546 Mar 29, 2026 +3
And you of course know perfectly how many missiles and launchers they had before the war.
3
Cav829 Mar 28, 2026 +44
I dunno, maybe it was a bad idea getting rid of so many people at our various agencies who knew what they were doing.
44
Nadante Mar 29, 2026 +11
But it was necessary because competent people are not sycophantic. They think critically. We have to convince them to do stuff with morals and ethics and stuff. That's too difficult. We want blind loyalty. We need that to bring back Jesus and end the world with Israel!
11
Chef_The_Ferret Mar 29, 2026 +3
The launchers matter more than the missiles
3
Drak_is_Right Mar 29, 2026 +5
The title is highly misleading. MISSILES AND DRONES. Vast majority of ballistic missiles have been used, destroyed, or buried. Iran has fired off 2500 ballistic missiles I believe (which put a major dent in their stockpile) then another like 1000 in the Israel war. Far LESS of the drone stockpile has been destroyed, buried, or used.
5
CBT7commander Mar 28, 2026 +12
That doesn’t matter. Priority will always be launchers. Also, 2 thirds of the missile stockpile being taken out isn’t bad (read the article)
12
PanicOverNothing Mar 28, 2026 +4
I am not doubting that they could have destroyed a third of Iran' missiles and that another third have been at least damaged. but this article leaves a lot of questions on the table. How have they determined how many missiles Iran has left? Since the war started how fast can they replenish the stock of missiles and drones? Could they have been given any missiles or could they have missiles coming from their allies Russia and China? Also afaik the 'missile cities' are also factories able to produce more missiles (I could be wrong on this). The guardian article makes reference to a reuters article, however in the reuters article I was able to find (I will link below) a US official says it is difficult to gauge how many missiles Iran has left or has stockpiled. Reuters article: [https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/us-can-only-confirm-about-third-irans-missile-arsenal-destroyed-sources-say-2026-03-27/](https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/us-can-only-confirm-about-third-irans-missile-arsenal-destroyed-sources-say-2026-03-27/)
4
Practical-Heat-1009 Mar 28, 2026 +6
Wow, the Guardian with another intentionally misleading headline. Surely it’s just an honest mistake and not something they do any time the US or Israel is mentioned.
6
Akrymir Mar 29, 2026 +2
30% destroyed and 30% buried… but that’s drones and missiles. When you count just the long range ballistic missiles, 90+% are destroyed/buried.
2
Winter_Criticism_236 Mar 29, 2026 +4
Translation - we have zero idea how many missiles they have and they sure keep firing them..
4
stonertear Mar 28, 2026 +5
12 weeks instead of 4 weeks, I can live with that. Key word here is missiles, not launchers.
5
MiserableTennis6546 Mar 29, 2026 +4
Make that 120 weeks.
4
CodeMonkeyPhoto Mar 29, 2026 +5
Well the US had certainly destroyed 2/3rds of its intelligence.
5
FUCKYOUINYOURFACE Mar 29, 2026 +2
Houthi’s are about to get hit.
2
BluehibiscusEmpire Mar 29, 2026 +2
How can public government statements and intelligence reports be so different?
2
JunkbaII Mar 29, 2026 +2
how do they get shot without launchers, precious?
2
TheAstbury Mar 29, 2026 +2
Hard to destroy missiles if you are busy bombing schools and civilian infrastructure
2
C_arpet Mar 28, 2026 +5
The US has only destroyed about a third of Iran’s missile and drone arsenal after a month of its war against Iran which aimed to degrade the country’s ballistic missile capabilities, according to a report by Reuters. About a third of Tehran’s missiles have been destroyed, and another third was likely to be damaged or buried in underground tunnels and bunkers, the report suggested. A similar assessment was made about the country’s drone arsenal. The report, based on five people familiar with US intelligence, suggests that while most of Iran’s missiles are immediately inaccessible, the country still has a sizeable stockpile. That contradicts Donald Trump’s statement on Thursday that Tehran had “very few rockets left” and statements from other US officials that the war has eliminated its ballistic missile capabilities. Iranian officials see its ballistic missile programme as a key deterrent, particularly given the vast military superiority of the US and Israel, which is within reach of its arsenal and views it as a direct threat. Iran has used ballistic missiles and drones to devastating effect over the last month, continuing to pound Israel and key energy and public infrastructure in the Gulf, and inflicting huge damage on the global economy. The US and Israel have said degrading Iran’s ballistic missile capacity is one of the chief aims of the war. IWashington has deployed thousands of more troops to the Middle East in recent days as the administration reportedly mulls a ground operation in Kharg island with the aim of reopening the strait of Hormuz. Trump said on Thursday: “The problem with the strait is this: Let’s say we do a great job. We say we got 99% [of their missiles]. 1% is unacceptable, because 1% is a missile going into the hull of a ship that cost a billion dollars.” Israel has made ballistic missile caches and launchers one of the primary targets of its aerial campaign in Iran. It says it has “neutralised” 335 or 70% of Tehran’s missile launchers. Iran has distributed its launchers across the country in an effort to evade Israeli detection and airstrikes. The number of launches has declined as Israel and the US continue to their bombing campaign, but missiles have still managed to hit Israel and the Gulf as interceptors also run out. Israel, the US and Gulf states have spent billions and expended critical interceptor stocks to block Iranian missile barrages. A US official, speaking anonymously, suggested that it would be impossible to assess Iran’s missile stockpile as much of it was stored underground. “I don’t know if we’ll ever have an accurate number,” they said. Iran fired 15 missiles and 11 drones at the United Arab Emirates on Thursday, according to the UAE defence ministry. The US defence secretary, Pete Hegseth, said the vast tunnel network created an extra challenge in destroying Iran’s missile stockpile, but said the US military would continue regardless. “We are hunting them down methodically, ruthlessly and overwhelmingly, like no other military in the world can do, and the results speak for themselves,” he said earlier this month.
5
dillpiccolol Mar 28, 2026 +18
The title of the article is misleading. The article also suggests another 1/3rd have been buried.
18
run_midnight Mar 28, 2026 +22
They may have up to 2/3 of their missiles but [they have less than 40% of their launchers left](https://share.google/zlDWmSUs5UAeIGIfL)
22
StephenHunterUK Mar 28, 2026 +10
Yes. You've got to physically put the missiles onto the launchers, fuel them up in most cases, drive to a launch point, raise the missile to firing position and launch... without being detected by a US or Israeli aircraft. Unlike Iraq, which has wide open desert expanse, Iran is pretty mountainous, which limits the area to cover... and also slows down deployment.
10
smitteh Mar 28, 2026 +2
What's that saying, something like 63% of all statistics have a 47% chance of being 29% factually inaccurate, 81% of the time?
2
Kranken_DeHogge Mar 28, 2026 +2
>A US official, speaking anonymously, suggested that it would be impossible to assess Iran’s missile stockpile as much of it was stored underground. “I don’t know if we’ll ever have an accurate number,” they said. how do we know how many launchers they have? and do we know of their capacity to rebuild launchers?
2
Man_under_Bridge420 Mar 28, 2026 +10
How do we know about the missiles? 
10
Essaiel Mar 28, 2026 +3
Surely the launchers are the more important target? Most of their missiles will be in secure bunkers. Which will only ever be of any use with the launchers.
3
paradigm_shift2027 Mar 29, 2026 +4
NO, NO, NO! President Trump said we have totally destroyed their military capability! The greatest president in the history of planet earth would not lie.
4
Nerupe Mar 29, 2026 +3
Have they let the Iranians know?
3
AusTex2019 Mar 29, 2026 +1
They obliterated the intelligence community and agencies so they are just making it up.
1
rightsidedown Mar 29, 2026 +2
"Intelligence Suggest", just stop, no one knows. This is all wild speculation either way, and we've been down this road before. Iran will either run out of missiles and some analyst who did a lot of guesswork with little information will be correct or they will keep shooting missiles and another analyst making another guess on little information will be the correct one.
2
gigorbust Mar 29, 2026 +2
Sorry, Intelli… what? Never until this year did it become clear how differently words are defined; "intelligence" is a stretch.
2
[deleted] Mar 28, 2026 -1
[deleted]
-1
HonestMadridFan Mar 28, 2026 +3
any day now
3
goflykite- Mar 28, 2026 +2
The reason no one ever attacked Iran isn’t because of their military. Their military is a joke. The real consequences is the potential for a global recession because of the straight of Hormuz. It’s impossible to protect ships going through the straight. Iran still holds all of the cards here.
2
SnooChickens1534 Mar 28, 2026 +2
Is that the same intelligence that said if you wipe out the leadership the people will rise up and iran will be free, or the same intelligence that said they werent a threat to the USA but Trump said they were 2 weeks away from a nuclear bomb. Its hard to believe the lies that's coming out of America . But if it is truly a third of Irans missiles , then they've 2 months supply left . If we cant get a ceasefire by then , the global economy is going to crash .
2
clipse270 Mar 28, 2026 +1
Who’s going to tell Trump
1
ynys_red Mar 28, 2026 +1
So Iran still has the potential to create A LOT of problems?
1
Shirolicious Mar 29, 2026 +1
Israel seems to be giving much more accurate information when it comes to this kind of stuff atleast.
1
macross1984 Mar 29, 2026 +1
Zelenskyy will be more than willing to help (for a price).
1
Ulrich453 Mar 29, 2026 +1
I almost exactly might know that we’ve probably taken care of destroying nearly if not atleast a few of all of Irans missiles
1
CircumspectCapybara Mar 29, 2026 +1
It's not the missiles that matter, it's the transport erector launchers, and US intel has it at hundreds destroyed. The effect is ballistic missile launch volume is down over 90% since the opening days of the war. Of course, it's not the end of the story, since interceptor stockpiles are down too.
1
die_in_a_fire_reddit Mar 29, 2026 +1
Is it bizarre that any random civilian like myself can see by the hour updates on the military movements in an emergent conflict? It had to be false, right? No way what they are saying an be accurate.
1
greenman5252 Mar 29, 2026 +1
That’s what “totally obliterated” means?
1
polygonalopportunist Mar 29, 2026 +1
Totally destroyed
1
Kind_Silver_1921 Mar 29, 2026 +1
Fake news it can only verify 1/3rd is destroyed because most of the sites they hit are underground
1
Iliker0cks Mar 29, 2026 +1
This must be an old headline because this war was over weekend ago.
1
Bitter_Procedure260 Mar 29, 2026 +1
This and the war in Ukraine remind me of WWI, where all the old world generals were using outdated strategies and their troops were getting decimated as a result. Countries like Canada performed comparatively better because their inexperienced generals had no preconceptions. Today we are seeing last centuries powers throwing billions of dollars worth of equipment at drone armies that might as well be infinite. The US can think what it wants, but Iran can dig in for years.
1
desancho Mar 29, 2026 +1
The word is totally obliterated, ok? They’re all totally obliterated….at least 1/3 of them.
1
journey01 Mar 29, 2026 +1
It doesn't matter. I was told we won the war weeks ago.
1
Department-of-Wario Mar 29, 2026 +1
Decades of preparation vs a whim.
1
ShakeMyHeadSadly Mar 29, 2026 +1
But we won?
1
bored_ryan2 Mar 29, 2026 +1
Great, so they’ll put US boots on the ground who will get their asses torn up by missiles with cluster warheads and an actual significant Iranian ground army.
1
Mjr3 Mar 29, 2026 +1
Are we including the missies destroyed upon impact with our bases?
1
ken_the_boxer Mar 29, 2026 +1
Neew shipments arriving from Russia and China for sure
1
Princess_Actual Mar 29, 2026 +1
So another three months.
1
Bisjoux Mar 29, 2026 +1
I guess maths isn’t this administration’s strong point. 33% isn’t the same as 100%. It’s both a surprise and not really a surprise that they went to war with no actual plan.
1
fanatic_tarantula Mar 29, 2026 +1
Doesnt really matters how many missiles you destroy, aslong as you destroy the majority of the launchers.
1
Oreoko Mar 29, 2026 +1
Third of of missiles capacity in huge country like Iran that hide it's missiles under mountains in under a month is a huge achievement. Why people here talk like it's a bad thing?
1
Head_Summer2052 Mar 29, 2026 +1
And Russia (Putin and his future successors like it, a lot!)
1
HarithBK Mar 29, 2026 +1
i mean that is pretty good figures considering the fact the US didn't go after missile storage sites but rather missile launchers and transport. it doesn't really matter if you have a million missiles if you only have 10 launchers and if you launch a single missile that launcher will get taken out. the effect is you only have 10 missiles left. this isn't me moving the goal post or anything this is what they US army said they were going for since day one. the issue is this idea hasn't kept up with how modern warfare has evolved with the war in Ukraine. Drone warfare means the objective a missile does can be done with by a single person anywhere. this blunder would not have happened had the US been more involved in working with and sending arms to Ukraine. there is a reason Sweden has been so invested and willing to send arms to Ukraine and make deals for factories etc. you need to take part in conflicts where modern proper armies meet or you will be left behind in the rapid development of arms that happens on the frontline. Iran has been very involved on the arms front for Russia in that conflict and changed there focus to drones for themselves.
1
Prudent_Link6029 Mar 29, 2026 +1
Warfighters need to warfight harder!
1
← Back to Board