"Yay! Make it go boom again!" cry the baby President Trump. He think he is playing video games.
93
DukeOfGeekMar 25, 2026
+9
I expect he laughs like Hitler in that scene where he is watching the fantasy propaganda sniper p*** movie.
9
PartyParrot-420Mar 26, 2026
+1
Basically Robin of the vale from GOT.
“I want to see the bad man fly!”
1
62ndsToComplyMar 25, 2026
+67
Our so-called president is fed a cocomelon-like brainrot of explosions like an iPad toddler, and we're supposed to be taken seriously as a country?
67
Jumpy-Scallion-9463Mar 25, 2026
+31
You were being laughed at long before we knew that
31
AdulteryMar 25, 2026
+10
We lost credibility as soon as he was allowed to run for public office, and especially so when he was elected into office. It’s Donald Trump. He was known as a disgusting sleazy con man, and everyone thought of him as a joke before whatever the f*** happened to people 10 years ago (it was smartphones and social media).
10
62ndsToComplyMar 25, 2026
+9
It ain't any better at the state level, been dealing with that since at least 2012 in my own memory.
9
sugarlessdeathbearMar 25, 2026
+4
Is that the solution? Just get him a big tablet, tell him it controls everything, let him play and just go on with life? Of course, that would mean he's either incredibly mentally deficient or actually certifiable.
4
beefyzacMar 25, 2026
+5
That’s exactly what’s happening right now. Trump gets the iPad while Miller pulls the strings.
5
TraherneMar 25, 2026
+2
This makes **Idiocracy** look like good politics.
2
gdghhfdffrfMar 25, 2026
+2
calling yourself the united states of america when hellbent on being the divided states of america is sort of weirder than a potemkin presidency. guaranteed by montesquieu's theory of separation of powers, you prevent the executive branch from having power over the legislative and judicial branches. whew. you may not be respected, but at least you're still a democracy ruled by many. /s.
2
CATIIIDUALMar 25, 2026
+18
He is a child. So, he needs visuals to understand what is happening. Too much information makes Donald bored.
18
No_big_whoopMar 25, 2026
+10
Learning new things is impossible when you're convinced you already know everything
10
RaisinOverall9586Mar 25, 2026
+31
I got $10 that says half the footage they're showing him is just random explosion videos from YouTube that have nothing to do with the Iran War.
31
SeminoleDVMMar 25, 2026
+11
What an absolute embarrassment.
11
Historical_Bend_2629Mar 25, 2026
+11
Not the US military. An intermediary. Appointed and hired by the administration. That Trump eats by the spoonful. This headline implies that Trump isn’t responsible.
11
Sad_Locksmith_2904Mar 25, 2026
+8
I wish we had a president who wasn’t a mentally disabled pedophile.
8
WavyGravy04Mar 25, 2026
+2
I too wish we didn’t have white Christian males in power
2
ZonghZonghZonghMar 25, 2026
+6
I’m shocked a guy who has an aide trail him around with a portable printer to print out on-demand good news, n-supply stories is placated by footage of bigly explosions.
6
StrigiStockBackingMar 25, 2026
+6
Pull out the troops and then just play him back like some Call of Duty clips every day. He'll think he's a better war strategist than Sun Tzu in like a week
6
Phase3InvestorMar 25, 2026
+5
Trump CANNOT make a deal even if he wanted, not one Iranians would remotely accept
While reading about how Trump wants to make a deal and is supposedly in negotiations with some anonymous but really important person in Iran, lets remember two points:
1- Any deal acceptable to Iranians will require some lifting of sanctions at bare minimum
2- By law, US Presidents CANNOT unilaterally lift sanctions imposed by Congress.
Remember folks, according to the US Constitution while US Presidents are in charge of diplomatic relations with other nations, ONLY Congress is in charge of economic relations with other nations:
Article I, Section 8 of the US Constitution explicitly grants Congress the power to "regulate commerce with foreign nations"
So ONLY Congress can lift sanctions on Iran (even ask gpt). And Congress is bought & paid for by Israel which is opposed to Iran
https://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/199645-gop-lawmaker-rejects-friedmans-bought-and-paid-for-assertion-on-netanyahu/
AIPAC pushed heavily for primary and secondary sanctions in Congress starting in mid-1990s when Iran first tried to make a deal with the US:
https://time.com/archive/6727086/down-goes-the-deal/
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/26/world/middleeast/kerry-reminds-congress-netanyahu-advised-us-to-invade-iraq.html
https://www.wrmea.org/1998-march/trade-and-finance-administration-in-hot-seat-thanks-to-aipac-drafted-iran-libya-sanctions-act.html
There are different kinds of "sanctions" laws but the MAIN sanctions laws are economic sanctions laws imposed by Congress.
Congress authorizes Presidents to ENFORCE theses sanctions laws, not to lift them. These sanctions laws give the US President some leeway for example to suspend sanctions for 6 months at a time, but suspending sanctions is not the same as lifting them - and having to do so every 6 months is probably not acceptable to Iran which would want a permanent lifting of sanctions instead to allow long term investments etc.
Legally, US sanctions on Iran cannot be lifted even if Iran totally gives up her nuclear program.
https://nationalinterest.org/feature/are-sanctions-fatwa-iran-6363
The legal preconditions to lifting sanctions are deliberately ridiculous because they're meant to be unliftable essentially
The continuation of Congressional sanctions under Obama was also why the JCPOA nuclear deal failed from the very start, before Trump was even elected and before he tore up the deal. (Obama and Kerry even tried to rally foreign banks to do business with Iran anyway but gave up since the banks were more concerned about OFAC rules.)
So no, the JCPOA nuclear deal was actually NOT "working" before Trump killed it contrary to widespread claims & despite Iran's verified compliance with it for more than a year even after Trump tore up. Trump's "withdrawal" did not kill the nuclear deal as it was never implemented by the US even under Obama thanks to continued Congressional sanctions, nor could it ever be implemented thanks to those sanctions:
"if the situation is not appreciably better soon, it will be impossible for the US and its partners to argue credibly that they are not in breach of the JCPOA."
THE IRAN NUCLEAR NEGOTIATIONS: ONE YEAR ON
Sir Richard Dalton
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03068374.2016.1225896
The Iranians had already started complaining too, before Trump was elected and "withdrew" from the deal
https://www.politico.eu/article/top-iranian-official-says-us-and-eu-have-not-fulfilled-nuclear-deal-weapons-valiollah-seif/
See, the aim and purpose of US sanctions on Iran is not so much to constrain Iran which is already throroughly sanctioned; the piled-on sanctions laws are instead meant to pose as legal and political impediments to improved relations between the US and Iran (which Israel disapproves of). Thats also why we still have sanctions on Cuba decades after the death of Castro and Communism - because another Congressional ethnic group lobby opposes improved relations and want to block it:
Cuba Sanctions: Legislative Restrictions Limiting the Normalization of Relations
Source: EveryCRSReport.com https://share.google/vH4TgnGtSXTcM6djQ
The actual "threat" Iran poses to Israel is not that Iran will nukes Israel, rather it is that Iran and the US may start to get along, which means Iran can then pose as a check on Israeli regional ambitions. That is why Israel has for decades tried to instigate a US-Iran conflict and why Israel & AIPAC so vehemently opposed the JCPOA nuclear deal
https://jewishcurrents.org/aipac-refuses-to-learn-from-its-mistakes-on-iran
https://www.catholic.org/featured/headline.php?ID=5970
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/israel-prodding-us-to-attack-iran/
https://www.amazon.com/Single-Roll-Dice-Obamas-Diplomacy/dp/0300169361
Netanyahu said that he was the only one who urged Trump to kill the Iran nuclear deal, boasting that he "stood up against the whole world" to make it happen
https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/why-netanyahu-really-wanted-trump-to-scuttle-the-iran-deal
Netanyahu also later expressed satisfaction that he finally convinced a US President aka Trump to attack Iran after 40 years of yearning
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/let-just-netanyahu-convinced-trump-202742557.html
Netanyahu and Congresx won't let Trump lift sanctions therefore no deal with Iran is possible. Trump cannot make a deal with Iran since at a minimum a deal will require permanent sanctions relief, which US Presidents cannot legally provide thanks to the influence of the Pro-Israeli lobby in Congress.
I'd welcome any contrary opinions
5
DeguildedMar 25, 2026
+1
The only contrary opinion i'll give you is that Trump doesn't give a f*** when he places sanctions and tariffs, so why would he give a f*** if he removes them with a very similar pen stroke?
He'll just say it is so, and let his party scramble afterwards trying to fulfill ridiculous and impossible promises stemming from a deal that never happened and a conversation 100% in his imagination. Just as he'll leave Israel twisting in the wind as soon as it's beneficial *personally* to him to do so. Which really means, as soon as Iran bribes him.
Unfortunately, religious nutcases usually don't see the sense in bribing their most hated enemies, so yeah, this is likely to continue. But not because of the constitution or legal precedent or anything.
1
Throwaway1303033042Mar 25, 2026
+4
South Park being prescient yet again.
4
fuckswitbeaversMar 25, 2026
+4
That’s what happens when you fire anyone who disagrees in the slightest. The disgraceful republicans own this full on
4
ProgrammerOk1400Mar 25, 2026
+5
Probably intermingled with shots from Rambo since he seems to have a massive boner for Sly’s physique
5
jakuth1999Mar 25, 2026
+3
Can someone get that meme about senator bloodfiend or whatever
3
Iowa_DaveMar 25, 2026
+3
Most of MAGA's view of international relations is from action movies, so **of course** blowing stuff up means a happy ending!
3
TripleJ80Mar 25, 2026
+2
He’s a man of action & for the people, right? He should just go over there and see for himself. Now that would be Operation Badass! (Trademark) Take JD & Lil’ Marco for a field trip.
2
whatproblemsMar 25, 2026
+2
probably could show him the same video every day
2
Agitated_Carrot9127Mar 25, 2026
+3
If you showed him WWII footage. He’d believe it was happening right now. He’s that incredibly stupid
3
desertoutlaw86Mar 25, 2026
+2
He’s like the sickley boy in game of thrones. Make them fly
2
Catspaw129Mar 26, 2026
+1
Honest question: How much of that is footage from the Iran/Iraq war?
Or from things going boom not even in Iran?
Like, say, Oh, I don't know: HIroshima?
1
Specialist-Mud4150Mar 26, 2026
+1
“TikTok brain is a great leadership quality” said no one ever..
1
CouchCorrespondentMar 25, 2026
+1
Make sure your "No Kings" signs have some easy words he can read...
1
MindOk8618Mar 25, 2026
+1
So that drunk Fox news guy on the left gets paid to do this on a daily basis?
1
Kaffe-MumrikenMar 25, 2026
+1
I mean we are fed the same reels here on Reddit daily
1
Knees0ckMar 25, 2026
+1
They are Faux News'ing the f*** out of Our Dear Presidential Geriatric Idiot.
1
NaptownSnowmanMar 25, 2026
+1
I think 36 is his bottom. Those people that still support him at this point either do not have the mental or personal capacity to change their view…or they are hateful racists and cruel.
1
DaddyDom401Mar 25, 2026
+1
Look at the leaders we follow.
1
AcanthisittaNo6653Mar 25, 2026
+2
Marine boot was like, they loved to show movies with carnage. It's part of the programming. I wonder if trump realizes how he's being reeducated.
2
a_little_finchMar 25, 2026
+1
I know some people like that. It’s all they do all day on X and YouTube.
1
IllustriousRange226Mar 25, 2026
-1
I mean, things are blowing up in the region, where’s the propaganda in that?
42 Comments