· 18 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 23, 2026 at 11:50 AM

US military says it seizes another oil tanker associated with Iran

Posted by pheexio


US military says it seizes another oil tanker associated with Iran
AP News
US military says it seizes another oil tanker associated with Iran
The U.S. military hsa seized another tanker associated with the smuggling of Iranian oil. The move on Thursday ratcheted up a standoff with Iran a day after its paramilitary Revolutionary Guards took control of two vessels in the crucial Strait of Hormuz.

🚩 Report this post

18 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
IntellectuallyDriven 2 days ago +26
"We will continue global maritime enforcement to disrupt illicit networks and interdict vessels providing material support to Iran, wherever they operate,” a Pentagon statement said. Ship-tracking data showed the Majestic X in the Indian Ocean between Sri Lanka and Indonesia , roughly the same location as the oil tanker Tifani, earlier seized by American forces. It had been bound for Zhoushan, China. ... The standoff between the U.S. and Iran has effectively choked off nearly all exports through the strait with no end in sight.
26
lost_horizons 2 days ago +8
what do they do with the oil? Is the US keeping it/selling it? China can't be happy about this.
8
stuffedandpickled 2 days ago +3
Maybe the US is bored with Iran. By stopping a tanker headed to China it can pull China into the war too. Spice things up even more.
3
Zenshinn 1 day ago +1
Seems to me Trump wants WWIII.
1
junkyardprimate 2 days ago +3
Where are they sending the boat crew?
3
Idiot_Savant_13 2 days ago +3
This is the same Navy that's been murdering survivors of fishing boats they claim are hauling drugs, right? The reality is likely that we will never know the truth.
3
hedokitali 2 days ago +2
I seize you, you seize me.
2
dz4505 2 days ago +2
How many oil tankers each nations have? Wondering how many of Iran fleet of oil tankers USA already seized.
2
takesthebiscuit 1 day ago +1
USA ? Hardly any -76 it’s expensive to operate under a USA flag https://www.maritime.dot.gov/data-reports/us-flag-fleet-dashboard
1
Sidwill 2 days ago +2
The thing is from a logistics standpoint do we have enough ships, trained boarding parties, and places to put these big ass ships to make a real dent in shipping? Also, what happens after we take possession of a ship, I assume we still need the crew to move it wherever we want to put it while not being able to leave a squad of soldiers on board to ensure it goes where we want it to. It seems that this is an unsustainable tactic.
2
FigSideG 2 days ago +1
I’m pretty sure I read about the situation with Venezuelan ships and that it was a logistical and financial nightmare to care for the ships they seized.
1
HarEr89 2 days ago +3
There will be no deal.
3
manniesalado 2 days ago +1
Seizing these vessels does give you another headache, and you don't get to keep the stuff or charge storage fees.
1
FigSideG 2 days ago +1
Didn’t they do this with Venezuelan ships and it turned out some of them were empty and that all of them cost a fortune to hold and maintain making it a mess?
1
Additional_Quiet2600 2 days ago +1
Keep screwing over nations over your war. I'm sur what will foster good will.
1
Potates42 2 days ago -1
Hey America, why don't you f*** off already? You're not solving anything. Breaking everything isn't winning.
-1
Moontoya 2 days ago +1
Military backed piracy  There's another charge for the icc
1
AlaKolas 2 days ago +1
The next time the ICC enforces something on the U.S. will be the first time.
1
← Back to Board