ListNook

lucasd11 Apr 11, 2026 +3309

Only war in the history of the universe that is exclusively fought on weekends and when the markets are closed

3309

catetheway Apr 11, 2026 +325

As if the 9-5 wasn’t stressful enough!

325

OldeFortran77 Apr 11, 2026 +60

Navy needs a union!

60

GoingAllTheJay Apr 12, 2026 +22

Bro just got labeled antifa by the US Govt for this comment.

22

BalanceEarly Apr 12, 2026 +1

Weekends are overtime!

1

AlfredJodokusKwak Apr 11, 2026 +117

Please don't call it a war. War needs approval of congress, this is just a special market manipulation operation. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER.

117

kemisage Apr 12, 2026 +36

Praise be to Allah is his new favourite.

36

Aedeus Apr 11, 2026 +68

This isn't even warfare at this point it's a cash grab.

68

ddrober2003 Apr 11, 2026 +25

Really it's the Democrats and Supreme Court's fault for cutting off Trump's cash flow with tariffs! So if anyone is the victim it's Trump! /s just in case lol.

25

Future_Kitsunekid16 Apr 12, 2026 +7

I've seen similar things said unironically irl so unfortunately the /s is indeed needed lol

7

mechalenchon Apr 11, 2026 +91

Well Pedonald needs some good news by the Monday trade opening. It doesn't matter if the news are real or not.

91

CCV21 Apr 11, 2026 +9

It's almost as if someone is trying to manipulate them.

9

Fantastic_Yam_3971 Apr 11, 2026 +14

Not to mention, if the (current) U.S. military says it, it must be true even if so far their word has been about as iron clad as a bridge made out of scotch tape.

14

13143 Apr 12, 2026 +4

Only war *so far*.

4

Gecks777 Apr 11, 2026 +960

Iran is saying they were threatened with a 30-minute warning, and then chased off after a drone was sent their way. Both sides heavily propagandize their communications and are happy to lie to support a narrative, so we probably won't know which version is actually true anytime soon.

960

Duchess430 Apr 11, 2026 +195

So we have to wait and see undeniable footage to figure out whether Iran or the US are lying.... Wheres James Cameron, someone needs to pull the bar from the ocean floor

195

Bad_At_Sports Apr 11, 2026 +126

Last we heard from James Cameron he was making the same movie for the 3rd time and triple the budget.

126

recumbent_mike Apr 11, 2026 +43

I still liked it better when it was called "Ferngully" and had Tim Curry in.

43

SloppityNurglePox Apr 11, 2026 +11

The faces he makes while singing [Toxic Love](https://youtu.be/4VOsfbaddsM?si=Kn2FdDxZWO6EuZ_9) are delightful.

11

HTH52 Apr 11, 2026 +27

I think he’s working on the 4th time now.

27

Mayor_Of_Califoggia Apr 11, 2026 +30

James Cameron doesn't do what James Cameron does for James Cameron. James Cameron does what James Cameron does because James Cameron is... James Cameron

30

FarawaySeagulls Apr 11, 2026 +9

Enter AI videos where you can't be sure anything is real anymore unless you see it with your own eyes. Oh what fun times we live in :/

9

Catch_022 Apr 11, 2026 +2

The US makes the claim so I reckon it's up to them to provide the proof, which they should be able to do (surely?).

2

rje946 Apr 11, 2026 +1

Plot twist: There are no ships, they're both just making stuff up.

1

casperdj21 Apr 12, 2026 +1

EVEN THEN, keep in mind Trumps Criminal Administration SAID " don't believe what you SEE in your Tic-Toc VIDEOS, just believe what WE TELL YOU)! LITERALLY!

1

cherrychelsea88 Apr 12, 2026 +1

I mean Iran does have footage of US ships sort of turning around and I'm yet to see any footage from the US but it's not a completely and totally convincing video. I choose to believe no one until proven otherwise.

1

YouCantSeeMe555 Apr 11, 2026 +102

Saw this quote in the NY Post yesterday. “You’re dealing against people that we don’t know whether or not they tell the truth,” Trump told The Post. I nearly died laughing.

102

SnooChipmunks6620 Apr 11, 2026 +3

Was he talking to a mirror?

3

komrade23 Apr 11, 2026 +15

When he isn't lying he is projecting. Sometimes he does both at the same time.

15

casperdj21 Apr 12, 2026 +1

Every "accusation" is actually an ADMISSION!

1

HappilyDisengaged Apr 11, 2026 +25

If tankers arent passing through freely, does any side of this story really matter?

25

Bored2001 Apr 11, 2026 +2

Maybe. The destroyers would be in the Gulf which potentially would be better placed to support a strike on kharg island. Or they contain the troops for invasion. Edit: of course they would also be sitting ducks for drone attacks too.

2

SeaEstablishment8947 Apr 12, 2026 +3

The Kharg island narrative is a non story anyways. If the U.S. takes over the island, Iran will just raise the toll. The U.S. can’t cover the whole strait. It’s the size of Dallas to NY. It’s a lot of f****** territory to cover with anti air.

3

Rent-a-guru Apr 12, 2026 +4

If the US takes Kharg Island, they take Iran's oil exports offline completely. I suspect Iran's response would be to take the rest of the gulf states' oil infrastructure out, to mine the Strait of Hormuz properly, and get the Houthis to close the Red Sea. It would be an economic shock at least twice as bad as the worst we've seen so far.

4

Gecks777 Apr 12, 2026 +5

I would have to assume Iran would just destroy all of the infrastructure on Kharg Island immediately, right? I believe the US can take it, sure, but I don't see a scenario where they comfortably hold it and keep the infrastructure intact. Even if Iran doesn't have the whole shebang wired with explosives and ready to blow (although, in their shoes, I can imagine why I wouldn't have set all that up by now), it seems implausible that the US can take the island, flatten every hidden artillery battery in range, and throw up an anti-air shield strong enough to swat down every drone and missile coming their way indefinately. Whatever way I slice it, even a perfectly successful assault ends up with an island full of burning scrap metal and dead marines.

5

giants707 Apr 12, 2026 +2

Well then iran gets nothing right? Even if US withdraws, they would have no infrastructure to export. Its lose-lose to iran.

2

Gecks777 Apr 12, 2026 +2

But the US also gains nothing and would lose military resources and lives, and suffer along with everyone else from the worldwide economic damage. That's why the idea of a ground attack on Kharg Island is so strange. It doesn't seem to have any strategic or even propaganda value.

2

Bored2001 Apr 12, 2026 +2

>I would have to assume Iran would just destroy all of the infrastructure on Kharg Island immediately, right? I don't see why they would do that. They'd just turn off the upstream infrastructure that feeds the island. It's not like the island's infrastructure is useful without oil actively going to it. I don't see Iran blowing up the infrastructure themselves. It would mean they can't recapture it later.

2

Bored2001 Apr 12, 2026 +2

It's my understanding that shaheds don't have active guidance, or at least not too much active guidance. They need a spot where the ships are slow moving in order to have a good chance of striking it over the time from launch to hit. That's why they used mines to push the tankers to an even narrower and slower part of the strait. As for kharg island, taking it is probably not strategically useful. But hey, can't say this admin is good at strategy.

2

SeaEstablishment8947 Apr 12, 2026 +3

All oil tankers are slow moving. There’s also the whole infrastructure on GCC side. There’s no “winning” here for Trump. There are some targets that can be destroyed but unless they can destroy every single drone factory then there will be problems. It’s completely asymmetry war that cannot be “won”.

3

BestFriendWatermelon Apr 12, 2026 +1

No. This is exactly the problem... The goal is to move oil tankers through the strait, and that only happens when a deal has been reached. Moving destroyers makes a deal even less likely. Trump is making out that these destroyers will give tankers confidence that the US can protect their ships from attack. But tanker operators don't sail on confidence, they sail on letters from their insurers. And their insurers say that sailing with a US destroyer e***** makes you more of a target, not less, and as such they won't insure it. A fully loaded tanker takes 3 miles to come to a halt. Tactically speaking they may as well be stationary. As well as being an enormous target, the IRGC trains to use tankers as cover so their speedboat swarms can get in close to US warships. So the entire notion of oil tankers transiting the strait without a rock solid peace agreement is absurd.

1

J69SUS Apr 11, 2026 +11

We dont know if they are both lying but we know who is definitely lying

11

EuropaWeGo Apr 11, 2026 +15

These lies are going to make it very difficult for normal traffic to start flowing again through the strait. For oil and insurance companies won't feel confident enough to take either country's word on the matter. In the end, if both countries don't completely align on what next steps are. Then I would assume the UN would have to step in to assure the safety of the ships.

15

Gecks777 Apr 11, 2026 +19

I am a big supporter of the UN, but it does not have the resources or mandate to police a mined waterway in an active war zone. It will be impossible to arrange action through the UN, because China and Russia can veto any action too harsh to Iran, while the US can veto any action not in its own interests or those of Israel. I think the most likely eventual outcome is that Iran will get enough of its demands to mollify them, and the Iran/Oman toll will just be a thing going forward. An international coalition of the willing deploying to try to force the strait open is, in my mind, the next most likely possibility, but it will have to be after the US exits the region and Israel agrees to fully stand down. Otherwise, the situation is just too volatile.

19

hiricinee Apr 11, 2026 +3

Us strategy would probably be to create a convoy e***** with navy vessels, any maybe to insure the shipments..

3

Upbeat-Whole9897 Apr 11, 2026 +5

I’m Ok with letting both sides believe they’ve won. So long as they stop killing one another.

5

boogi3woogie Apr 11, 2026 +11

You can track the ships easily.

11

Boys4Ever Apr 11, 2026 +21

Only if they enabled AIS which apparently one did and apparently as a show of force. Otherwise seems all other naval vessel are running dark for obvious reasons

21

timfountain4444 Apr 11, 2026 +5

"AIS"

5

joelfarris Apr 11, 2026 +2

Thank you for this. I was having trouble trying to figure out why the Audio Engineering Society was involved in all of this beacon-y stuff.

2

fury420 Apr 11, 2026 +25

All the online tracking only shows ships that choose to broadcast their location. One of the two ships mentioned hasn't updated their position since the war began, and the other was last tracked headed towards the strait like 10 hrs ago and has had their tracking turned off since.

25

[deleted] Apr 11, 2026 +5

[deleted]

5

Federal_Decision_608 Apr 11, 2026 +5

Yes? Do you think they have cloaking devices?

5

OrganizationOk5551 Apr 11, 2026 +2

All vessels can be tracked, unless they deactivate AIS. All vessels over a certain gross tonnage are required to have them. Military vessels can and often do disable AIS though.

2

BendicantMias Apr 12, 2026 +2

The whole point of these ships sailing there in the first place is propaganda. They aren't minesweepers, so the 'clearing mines' excuse is just that. The only reason they're there is so the Orange Taco can boast to his cult by pointing at them and claiming he controls the Strait. Never mind that ships still aren't crossing it unless Iran specifically allows them to. He's trying to make the most of this ceasefire for his ratings.

2

BestFriendWatermelon Apr 12, 2026 +2

People also should be aware that internet connection in Iran is non-existant now. As such people in Iran have zero idea what's going on. They aren't on Listnook, they haven't seen Trump's tweets, they know nothing about what's going on except what the regime is telling them. And Iranian TV tells them the US has surrendered, and Iran has won. No amount of threats and bluster from Trump, nor exhortations for the Iranian people to rise up, ever reach the people of Iran.

2

mr-301 Apr 11, 2026 +8

I mean , this is pretty easy to prove one way or another…. Simply what side of the strait is the boat now, if it’s done through and it’s on the other side the us are telling the truth, if it’s not then Iran is telling the truth…

8

Gecks777 Apr 11, 2026 +15

In both versions, the US ship crossed back out of the strait. The US version is that they sailed through and back as a show of force, to reconnoiter, and to prove it safe for civilian traffic. The Iranian version is they went a little way in, got warned off, and retreated. Even if the US version of the war so far is basically accurate, they don't want to hang around in the area. If the war were to suddenly turn hot again, I don't think a handful of ships caught on the wrong side of the Strait with no support would be in for a great time. Limited missiles, no resupply, a gauntlet waiting if you try to leave the way you came, and Chinese surveillance satellites circling overhead, just thrilled to feed the Iranians your exact coordinates the second you stop moving, whether at a friendly port or because you've run out of fuel.

15

myredditaccount80 Apr 12, 2026 +5

Sending the ships through once there is a ceasefire doesn't seem like much of a show of force. Maybe just testing the ceasefire or the ability of the negotiators to actually dictate what IRGC do.

5

tagillaslover Apr 11, 2026 +6

Yeah I’m gonna go out on a limb and say Iran wouldn’t be issuing warnings that actually mean anything. There was either no warning or an empty one, if they wanted to try and hit the ship they’d have just done so

6

Doogie90 Apr 11, 2026 +3

If the U.S. Navy decided to conduct FONOPS they already know that Iran will threaten an attack. Iran threatening an attack is not an unexpected outcome. A single drone would not “scare off” two Destroyers. Two destroyers could handle 10 - 20 drones easily and when you add air cover, which would also be deployed, that number goes up. There isn’t a “turning back” by the Destroyers in this scenario.

3

Combat_Orca Apr 11, 2026 +2

I mean technically they still crossed then, just immediately returned

2

phoenix1984 Apr 12, 2026 +1

Honestly, f*** the Iranian govt, but they have been speaking far more truthfully than Trump.

1

Ok_Spray3750 Apr 11, 2026 +216

It's hilarious and sad that this is breaking news

216

DR-PG Apr 11, 2026 +216

They did not pass. They had to return. Go to the tracker and see for yourself: https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/ais/home/centerx:55.4/centery:26.0/zoom:9

216

Altaredboy Apr 11, 2026 +67

Port in my city used to always tell us that they weren't allowed to disclose when the US navy was coming in for security reasons. We were repairing one of the wharves & would often come to work in the morning only to be told we weren't allowed on site as the US navy were on our berth. Then we discovered websites like these, that often had the eta of ships accurately postsd. I don't know if they were lying or what the hell was going on with them

67

BobertRosserton Apr 11, 2026 +24

I think it’s just one those things like inconvenient obfuscation. They can’t hide the ships, they’re pretty big, but they can at least make it slightly harder to gather the information. Like you can track anyone’s flight if you wanted to and had a pretty minimal amount of information, but most people wouldn’t know where to start.

24

Altaredboy Apr 12, 2026 +7

I don't think so. Because before we discovered the website we found out the shipping agency that handled them & they'd freely give us that information.

7

IllllIIIllllIl Apr 11, 2026 +40

How exactly do I see for myself? This is a real “draw the rest of the f****** owl” comment.

40

LeatherFruitPF Apr 11, 2026 +43

It's like when someone sends me a github link as if my dumbass knows what I'm looking at.

43

iAREsniggles Apr 11, 2026 +10

I just fumble my way around until I find something to download. I put too much trust in GitHub for someone that doesn't understand it at all.

10

Inuyaki Apr 12, 2026 +2

There is a "Releases" section at the right side? You can also just click on the very green "Code" Button and download the zip, but that is maybe harder to find if you don't know it. But the Releases section should be easy?

2

iAREsniggles Apr 12, 2026 +4

Yeah, I was being a bit facetious. I will say that's how I used GitHub at first, but I'm pretty good at finding my way around it now. But I do appreciate you trying to be genuinely helpful.

4

_Ban_Evader Apr 12, 2026 +9

I miss the days when the real neckbeards would refuse to distribute compiled software. All you get is the source code and a makefile that doesn't work on your machine.

9

Memitim Apr 12, 2026 +8

*Light the candle* `tar xfvz shiprip.tgz` *Ignite the incense* `configure` *Make the sacrifice* `make` Dependency WHAT?!?

8

Pyro1934 Apr 11, 2026 +32

I'm too dumb to use that fancy site but since you posted it I'll trust you!

32

Amatak Apr 12, 2026 +3

I see US GOV vessel 112 still in the middle of the straight, gulf-side.

3

Mammoth_Buyer_7622 Apr 12, 2026 +1

It’s something only Listnookors care about

1

LittleShrub Apr 11, 2026 +441

2 months ago, ships could freely sail through the strait.

441

Hon3y_Badger Apr 11, 2026 +21

Right, but now two war ships with the backing of multiple F35 with air to air weapons can freely sail through.

21

Affectionate_Oven_77 Apr 11, 2026 +123

Impossible to know what’s actually true until we get the LEGO confirmation video

123

leisurechef Apr 11, 2026 +130

Commercial shipping ain’t going through there anytime soon

130

sobi-one Apr 11, 2026 +33

This is the thing that’s really at play here. Iran doesn’t gain nearly as much from hitting a US naval ship as it does from striking ships carrying things like oil.

33

Silver_Middle_7240 Apr 11, 2026 +10

Sinking a US warship would be a huge W for Iran.

10

ammonthenephite Apr 11, 2026 +7

They don't need to though. They are better off saving their ordinance for the commercial shipping. Keep them scared and it won't matter how many US warships go through the canal, the straight will still be effectively closed, and the world will feel those effects.

7

where_is_the_camera Apr 11, 2026 +18

Sinking a US Navy ship would also be one of very few things that could happen which might provide some "rally around the flag" support for the war in America. As it is, Iran is fully aware that this is the most unpopular war in American history. There's more pressure on Trump coming from the threat of midterm elections than anything Iran is doing specifically to the US or its Navy. I'm thinking Iran wants to keep it that way.

18

HelloIamGoge Apr 11, 2026 +2

Yep they need to save those drones for occasional propaganda Ws and scaring away oil insurance companies. Everything else is a luxury.

2

Frothar Apr 12, 2026 +2

They will just pay the ayatoll booth. Commercial companies don't care about politics

2

Mana_Seeker Apr 11, 2026 +74

Excerpt "WASHINGTON, April 11 (Reuters) - The U.S. military said on Saturday that two ‌of its warships sailed through the Strait of Hormuz as part ⁠of a plan to start removing mines from the vital conduit for the global oil trade. Sending the ‌ships ⁠through the strait was aimed at "setting conditions for clearing mines ⁠in the Strait of Hormuz," U.S Central ⁠Command posted on X."

74

LorenzoSparky Apr 11, 2026 +50

Sorry, just to clarify, but if it was posted on X then does that mean it’s not true? Doesn’t it have to be posted on truth social to be verifiable information.

50

luvinbc Apr 11, 2026 +15

lol, verified information in this day and age where I can post whatever I want to without any consequences for false information. Maybe an hour ago just read that one American vessel was trying to cross but Iran basically told them you have x amount of time to turn around or we open fire on you. They turned around.

15

InterstellarReddit Apr 11, 2026 +9

Your thought process is correct it’s been denied by actual news outlets: https://www.tasnimnews.ir/en/news/2026/04/11/3563239/axios-claim-of-us-navy-ship-crossing-hormuz-strait-denied

9

LorenzoSparky Apr 11, 2026 +2

My comment was a little tongue in cheek but i guess it’s laced with some truth haha

2

woodyarmadillo11 Apr 11, 2026 +3

Nope, the ships were turned away. Iran "remains determined not to allow any vessel to transit without authorization," semiofficial news agency Tasnim reported. According to the outlet, there is no traffic in the strait at the moment, and "the American destroyer that intended to pass through the strait was not granted permission." https://www.nbcnews.com/world/iran/live-blog/live-updates-trump-iran-hormuz-israel-lebanon-ceasefire-talks-pakistan-rcna285140

3

Rustic_gan123 Apr 11, 2026 +15

These destroyers sailed to Dubai and only then turned around

15

Express_Monk3571 Apr 11, 2026 +5

Do you really think the US cares about what Iran says at this point in time or any other time in history? Lol

5

woodyarmadillo11 Apr 11, 2026 +2

Civilians here absolutely do. The US, Israel, and Iran all spread propaganda, but so far the most accurate information we’ve been getting has been coming from Iran… which is very embarrassing.

2

Express_Monk3571 Apr 11, 2026 +4

Yeah that may be the case. But if anything this "war" with Iran has shown that the US can and will (with the wrong person giving the orders) do whatever they want.

4

oneshot99210 Apr 12, 2026 +3

Except: *Can't force peace *Can't get Iran to give up control of the strait *Can't get any cooperation from the rest of the world to help get things back to where they were 6 weeks ago *Can't stop a $2,000 drone with anything less than a $2,000,000 missile But other than that, okay.

3

Redditkid16 Apr 11, 2026 +19

AIS data from 11 hours ago shows USS Michael Murphy entering the straight https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/ais/home/shipid:7771657/zoom:9

19

pjbenn Apr 11, 2026 +1

What about the other ship? Uss frank peterson according to another post here

1

Westbrooks3ptShot Apr 11, 2026 +42

Bloomberg is saying this did not happen and they were forced to turn around. Not really sure what is going on

42

Gloomy-Cover7669 Apr 11, 2026 +14

I believe Bloomberg. Sailing destroyers within range of hostile shore based artillery and drones is just a really dumb idea.

14

JealousChip8469 Apr 11, 2026 +60

you mean the same strait that was completely open a month ago? great work.

60

Constant-Tea3148 Apr 11, 2026 +40

Are they actually going to pull an attack in the middle of negotiations for the third time? Would be quite something.

40

Xanderfanboi Apr 11, 2026 +7

It’s probably force posture, a threat if talks don’t go well.

7

Donny-Moscow Apr 11, 2026 +7

Wouldn’t that kind of leave those two ships hanging? If talks break down and the Strait was no longer passable, won’t they be stuck in the Gulf?

7

ShareGlittering1502 Apr 11, 2026 +3

Yup. And would be an interesting tactic if Iran let several navy ships in specifically to trap them. I think it’d end poorly for everyone involved but it’d be a hell of a move

3

OmiSC Apr 11, 2026 +8

I mean, if I had to bet using only history as my guide…

8

dantheman_woot Apr 11, 2026 +12

It's not about the world's most heavily armed and most capable warships transiting the straight. It's about civilian crewed non armored no defense bulk freighter transiting the straight. This is honestly embarrassing. We cant provide e****** for a convoy with any confidence or we would have done so before now.

12

SeaEstablishment8947 Apr 12, 2026 +1

Yep. And we can possibly e***** some ships on the narrowest part but what about the whole other part of the strait? The whole area is under range of Iranian drones. They would need a golden dome that is 10 times larger than Israel’s.

1

MAVERICK910 Apr 11, 2026 +7

I don't think these ships have mine sweeping capabilities?

7

Doogie90 Apr 11, 2026 +5

Thy don’t but they can evaluate the conditions and are both heavily armed. Better to send them through first as part of Freedom of Navigation (FONOPS)

5

Man_on_Z_moon Apr 11, 2026 +9

Cool, we’re still $39 trillion in debt and most people don’t have healthcare. But we’re winning!

9

Carthonn Apr 11, 2026 +3

When a previously normal Saturday occurrence becomes a significant political event of your presidency you know you’re a REALLY shitty President.

3

myredditaccount80 Apr 12, 2026 +3

NY Times reporting matches up better with the Iran version: "The two Navy ships sailed from the Gulf of Oman before entering the Strait of Hormuz and then turning around, according to U.S. officials and others briefed on the operation. It is not clear exactly when the Iranian surveillance drone was destroyed. One person briefed on the operation said the drone was likely meant to signal a threat to the U.S. warships. Though the American officials said the surveillance drone was not a direct threat, the Navy determined that it did not want Iranian forces tracking the ships’ movements. The American officials insisted that destroying the drone did not violate the cease-fire." [(2) Iran War Live Updates: U.S. and Iran Hold Marathon Peace Talks Into the Early Morning - The New York Times](https://www.nytimes.com/live/2026/04/11/world/iran-war-trump-talks-pakistan)

3

Ok-Entertainment6043 Apr 12, 2026 +3

The same military that said the war was over? Can’t be believed

3

hermitish Apr 12, 2026 +3

Even if they run through it day and night will that be enough to convince shipping companies to commit their hundreds of millions of ship and cargo without absolute guarantees from Iran they won’t be targeted?

3

thisismeingradenine Apr 12, 2026 +3

You are living in 1984.

3

GeneralCommand4459 Apr 12, 2026 +3

So they put two very expensive ships into a body of water with only one narrow exit that is most often controlled by their adversary?

3

yuje Apr 11, 2026 +4

Sounds like ceasefire is only being used as a pause to reload and move more troops into the region without being fired at?

4

Moist-muff Apr 11, 2026 +2

Sure they did

2

ricker182 Apr 11, 2026 +2

What an unbelievable feat. Is this the first ship to ever make this trip? Crazy!

2

Kronothus Apr 11, 2026 +2

Not even sure who to believe Iran and US both be talking shit 💀

2

Bishopjones2112 Apr 11, 2026 +2

Going in? How about coming out?

2

-re-da-ct-ed- Apr 11, 2026 +2

Congrats I guess? /s

2

PlainBread Apr 11, 2026 +2

Yeah ok, just like that girlfriend who lives in Canada we've never met?

2

yremysleep Apr 11, 2026 +2

Imagine how that crew slept before the start of that mission. Brave people!

2

Porkyrogue Apr 11, 2026 +1

Except it was a ghost crew.......

1

searching-4-peace Apr 12, 2026 +2

Will they carry all the oil?

2

xyloplax Apr 12, 2026 +2

World's Most Powerful Navy, folks. What an achievement.

2

The_Poop_Shooter Apr 12, 2026 +2

never let anything but the fact all of this is trump and his administration's fault leave top of narrative - its all that matters

2

[deleted] Apr 11, 2026 +14

[deleted]

14

Thurak0 Apr 11, 2026 +29

They could have sailed through the strait just fine on February 27th 2026.

29

Man_under_Bridge420 Apr 11, 2026 +9

Lets see another navy do it then, maybe the Iranian navy could try?

9

Mana_Seeker Apr 11, 2026 +6

Someone has to clean up the mines eventually

6

84Cressida Apr 11, 2026 +16

Iran won so much their ships sunk because they couldn’t float after all that winning -Listnook

16

bigDeltaVenergy Apr 11, 2026 +13

Iran have lost its conventional marine (exception of 9 submarine) AND, USA is loosing the war cuz they are failing third military objectives. Both can be true.

13

Sea-Cheesecake301 Apr 11, 2026 +8

lol somehow I knew the first comment was going to be someone framing this as a bad thing.

8

ruinedbymovies Apr 11, 2026 +15

They aren’t framing it as a bad thing they’re framing it as an embarrassment.

15

mpsteidle Apr 11, 2026 +9

Mines are a legitimate threat regardless of the size of your navy.

9

ruinedbymovies Apr 11, 2026 +4

I am aware, but that does nothing to change the intent of the comment you were responding to.

4

MourningRIF Apr 11, 2026 +3

Oh well.. if a fast moving warship with billions of dollars worth of self defence can pass through, I would definitely take a slow moving, defenseless freighter full of $2 billion dollars worth of oil through there as well.

3

Dauntless_Idiot Apr 11, 2026 +3

They are protected by international law on war crimes and the ICC! The ICC is going to issue war crimes arrest for every last operator who launched attacks on civilian ships. >[Iran has achieved](https://www.wsj.com/opinion/why-the-international-criminal-court-isnt-taking-on-iran-9e789091) a singular statistic in its current front against Israel. After firing more than 400 missiles over nearly a month, Tehran apparently hasn’t hit a single Israeli military target. That leaves the Islamic Republic with a 100% civilian casualty ratio—a benchmark of the number of civilian casualties relative to combatant ones. >Not long ago, civilian casualty ratios were at the heart of discussions of the Israel-Gaza war, with Israel’s critics claiming that “disproportionate” levels of civilian casualties were evidence of war crimes. In reality, Israel’s infliction of 30% to 40% military casualties on an adversary hiding behind civilians was impressive by the standards of urban warfare. Now that Iran is batting a consistent .000, commentators seem less focused on casualty ratios. Oh wait, the ICC isn't even investigating Iran. They did recently start investigating Israel.

3

panlouis Apr 12, 2026 +3

Nobody believes a word coming from Yankee Doodle land.

3

ThnkWthPrtls Apr 11, 2026 +3

Hey, you know when so many US ships were able to get through the Straight of Hormuz that it wasn't even worth mentioning in the news? 6 weeks ago before our dipshit president started this stupid f****** War

3

Mystery-Ess Apr 12, 2026 +2

That is costing you guys billions and billions of your tax dollars.

2

cmere-2-me Apr 11, 2026 +2

I thought there was ninja mines blocking it?

2

SeeingEyeDug Apr 11, 2026 +2

I’ve gone on multiple deployments during my 20 Year career where our entire battle group transited the strait multiple times. 2 ships is only a fraction of one battle group for one transit.

2

jert3 Apr 11, 2026 +2

Whoever runs America these days must be so disappointed the bait was not taken, and the ships were not attacked.

2

LincolnHighwater Apr 11, 2026 +2

WHAT A GIFT, VERY EXPENSIVE, LIKE NO ONE HAS EVER SEEN BEFORE, EVERYONE IS TALKING ABOUT IT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER.

2

ZucchiniYall Apr 11, 2026 +3

Are they looking for the Moskva or something?

3

seedless0 Apr 11, 2026

>ships crossed through Where they had been crossing through freely before their own Chicken-in-chief threw a tantrum.

0

Locoman7 Apr 11, 2026 +1

I thought we had a ceasefire?

1

Ok_Squash9609 Apr 11, 2026 +1

“It’s a trap”

1

Optimus_Prime_10 Apr 11, 2026 +1

Anyway, tell me more about how we are investigating the Epstein class and seeking justice in the name of their victims.

1

seclifered Apr 11, 2026 +1

Seems kind of dangerous to be cut off if Iran closes the strait

1

ConditionHoliday2844 Apr 11, 2026 +1

Pow

1

Torodong Apr 11, 2026 +1

Can they get out again or are they now part of a hostage negotiation?

1

TheJiggie Apr 11, 2026 +1

When is the new Lego propaganda video gonna drop with Irans take?

1

Groundbreaking_Cat68 Apr 11, 2026 +1

Not true. Government propaganda not so easy to do anymore.

1

EggstaticAd8262 Apr 11, 2026 +1

The US said that? I mean, to me, those ships are in a superposition. They either didn't or they did. I still don't know.

1

DoughnutSignificant8 Apr 11, 2026 +1

Going in or out?

1

dbandit1 Apr 11, 2026 +1

Shake it all about

1

Financial_Calendar77 Apr 11, 2026 +1

what does this mean for oil?

1

Tripple_Bogey Apr 11, 2026 +1

Very interesting article on the subject, looks like the US ships went through and turned on AIS. [Iran threatens U.S. warships after they throw down the gauntlet for w*****-take-all Strait of Hormuz | Fortune](https://fortune.com/2026/04/11/iran-war-us-warships-strait-of-hormuz-transit-irgc-ceasefir-talks/)

1

rva_monsta Apr 11, 2026 +1

Show me the Lego footage

1

izthatso Apr 11, 2026 +1

Wow. 2.

1

GoingAllTheJay Apr 12, 2026 +1

Lol ok big guy. Tell us when there is actual news.

1

30yearCurse Apr 12, 2026 +1

get trapped in a smaller pond...easier to drone swarm..

1

iumesh Apr 12, 2026 +1

What goes in must come out 🤷‍♂️

1

UrsaMajor7th Apr 12, 2026 +1

US military bragging about ships like The Count: *ONE! Hahahahaha* *TWO! TWO SHIPS!! Hahahahaha*

1

doomeddeath Apr 12, 2026 +1

Now what?

1

hornetjockey Apr 12, 2026 +1

Mission accomplished!

1

Future_Supermarket85 Apr 12, 2026 +1

Israel must be pissed .

1

manticore16 Apr 12, 2026 +1

It's like f****** Red Rover now.

1

US military says two of its ships crossed through Strait of Hormuz

💬 Send a Message

176 Comments