· 179 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 15, 2026 at 7:04 AM

U.S. military turned back six ships in first 24 hours of Iranian port blockade

Posted by Stunning-Common-9591


U.S. military turned back 10 ships since start of Iranian port blockade
NBC News
U.S. military turned back 10 ships since start of Iranian port blockade
The U.S. military is using more than 100 U.S. fighter and surveillance aircraft, as well as more than a dozen ships, to enforce the blockade.

🚩 Report this post

179 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
trottelgdata 4 days ago +700
Did they say 'thank you'?
700
DarkLordMelketh 4 days ago +170
No. But they were wearing gigantic ship sized suits.
170
Effective_Jello9731 4 days ago +43
Better not have been tan 😠
43
TheLandOfConfusion 4 days ago +16
If they had been tan they would have been better camouflaged and the US wouldn’t have noticed them slip through
16
Forward-Surprise1192 4 days ago +15
I doubt the USA navy is going’ to shoot those ships even if they ignore the blockade
15
SunMachiavelliTzu 4 days ago +54
The way things are going I wouldn't bet on that...
54
Ok-League-3024 4 days ago +14
Yep Trump would just make up that they had drugs and stuff
14
timesink3000 3 days ago +1
He would sink the ship and then order them to shoot the survivors.
1
shortyman920 4 days ago +17
No but they can board them and divert them to a nearby port and hold them. These shipping tankers are manned by civilians and they aren’t going to take aggressive action against the us navy. This isn’t a video game
17
virtual_adam 4 days ago +24
The same one sinking random boats in the Caribbean? Different sized boats, same pilots, we already know they are not afraid to publicly and proudly bomb random ships, then bomb them a second time illegally, then post the video on Twitter
24
Neurojazz 4 days ago +6
And then (while grabbing it by the p****), proclaim you are the son of God.
6
Bupod 4 days ago +1
I don’t think they’d launch ASMs at them and sink them  But I could see them sending a helicopter with a boarding party and just arresting the crew and holding the ship.  It would be much less backlash than simply shooting it, and gives them the option to just release the crew and ship when Donnie reads too many mean tweets about himself on Twitter and decides to not only lift the blockade but claim there never was one to begin with.
1
hippodribble 4 days ago +348
That's a sixteenth of a boat every fifteen minutes.
348
TheSharpestHammer 4 days ago +123
My god. How do they keep the water out?
123
UndercoverFBIAgent9 4 days ago +9
The front fell off
9
alexefi 4 days ago +3
Its outside of the enviroment.
3
rando_dud 3 days ago +1
There's a minimum crew requirement
1
Sloppy_Steak85 3 days ago +2
No cardboard
2
globalgreg 4 days ago +32
But what is that in football fields?
32
DisenchantedByrd 4 days ago +10
It's 4/9ths of a banana-length every 3/64th of a second.
10
therealhairykrishna 4 days ago +4
Can you give it me in furlongs per Swatch .beat?
4
absat41 4 days ago +1
deleted
1
sharp11flat13 4 days ago +1
And sub-mooches. Also known as Trusses or Tomatoes.
1
TownieG 4 days ago +4
Proper football, or U.S. handegg ball?
4
Identity_ranger 4 days ago +1
Sorry, how many shoe soles was a football field again?
1
Engineer9 4 days ago +1
Or Texi?
1
IKillZombies4Cash 4 days ago +9
Boats per Scaramucci please?
9
Thomas_Shreddison 3 days ago +2
I believe that would be roughly 66 ships per mooch, or 66,000 ships per kilomooch
2
CarPhoneRonnie 4 days ago +3
if that frequency starts to resonate everything blows up
3
ElectricalGate6615 4 days ago +3
i am so confused
3
sck178 4 days ago +1
I am confusion
1
baronofdirt 4 days ago +9
Good thing he cut social programs and billionaires don’t pay taxes. Using 100 military aircraft to send warnings to six vessels sounds cost effective. Do you think they were towing banners like you see at the beach? I feel bad for Americans aware of how fucked up this serial sex offender protecting regime is and how badly they are f****** everything about the United States up.
9
oldchairman 4 days ago +114
So what will happen to the crew of the ships ? , will they be stuck there for ever?
114
this_dudeagain 4 days ago +83
If you went to an Iranian port then yes unless you use another port in the straight to get home over land/air.
83
Watch-Logic 4 days ago +16
I believe it also encompasses ships that pass thru Iranian territorial waters ie ships that pay the toll to iran
16
BitRunner64 4 days ago +162
Open the Fuckin' Strait, you crazy bastards!
162
Danny-Reisen-off 4 days ago +66
You seem angry. But did you see that the Dow Jones was 48.500+ today?
66
FluffyGreenThing 4 days ago +31
Pretty sure the person you replied to forgot these “” in their comment because that’s a direct quote from the US president believe it or not.
31
iRegretsEverything 4 days ago +1
Wait you talking to the united states or Iran?
1
Strykerz3r0 4 days ago +3
Either? Both? Well, Vance called it 'economic terrorism' when Iran did it and literally said that two can play that game. So, now the US is admitting to engaging in economic terrorism, as well.
3
CynicViper 3 days ago +3
The US isn’t targeting the ships of neutral third parties. They are targeting ships that are trading with, or collaborating with Iran. Which, is something called war. Meanwhile, Iran is targeting EVERY ship that goes through Hormuz. That is terrorism.
3
ElTejon_TheDestroyer 4 days ago +447
So what is different to the US than the ‘terrorist state of Iran’?
447
DoctorMicroDong 4 days ago +472
Well, there isn't one. JD Vance in an interview yesterday said what Iran is doing is a form of economic terrorism and thst two can play at that game.
472
angelus14 4 days ago +187
We're not even trying to hide it anymore, huh?
187
Yvaelle 4 days ago +172
They're not confessing, they're bragging
172
lostparis 4 days ago +39
This is sort of how the US has always done things. If they do it then it is justified. If another country does it then it becomes a morality issue.
39
onarainyafternoon 4 days ago +14
I love that line from The Big Short so much. So perfectly encapsulates the kind of evil we experience often in our world.
14
KaliUK 4 days ago +1
It’ll make the arresting everyone after this madness ends easier.
1
Far_Section3715 4 days ago -3
Hide what? The fascism?
-3
LiveToLoveAndLearn 4 days ago +24
Well they went to war to disrupt energy distribution to China. When Iran said nobody goes through but who I choose (I.e. Chinese clients or other non hostile countries)… the equivalent of a nuke when you don’t have it… US invented a story to block what they sought they could limit but kicking the hornets nest. Bottom line, USA is the problem and nobody is blind.
24
oOoZrEikAoOo 4 days ago +48
And so why are they (Iran) also blocking European ships although most european countries are not participating in this clown show? Matter of fact is that they did support Russia with missiles, drones, weapons in the conflict not against Ukraine, but the whole Europe. So really, “friendly countries” actually mean Russia and China only.
48
lostparis 4 days ago +13
> And so why are they (Iran) also blocking European ships Because those countries will pressure the US. To be fair I think Spain has a "free pass" because they have publicly stood up to the US.
13
swizzcheez 4 days ago +5
There can be more than one problem actor.
5
maxpowers2020 4 days ago +7
The point is the too cut off funding to the regime?
7
hiricinee 4 days ago +10
Yes basically if they're going to try to bankrupt the world to fight the war the US is going to bankrupt them. I anticipate if they dont agree to open the strait the US starts targeting bridges and energy infrastructure.
10
ButterscotchSkunk 4 days ago +1
Who is this guy, Destro?
1
Golda_M 4 days ago +39
One difference is that the US blockade is a "normal" blockade. The US has naval forces out there enforcing it. The IR method involves randomly firing on enough ships to scare off (terrorize) the rest. Ultimately though, the strategy is the same. It's a mutual blockade. Allow shipping from Arab ports or no ships to Iranian ports. Only the tactics differ. 
39
Twofer-Cat 4 days ago +89
Blockading a belligerent state is legal, blockading the high seas and especially hitting non belligerent ships isn't.
89
Denubious 4 days ago -24
Then Iran blockading the belligerent states in the Persian gulf is legal by that logic. This logic wouldn't apply to the US blowing up and boarding non belligerent ships around Venezuela.
-24
Twofer-Cat 4 days ago +39
A) they aren't at war with every Gulf state, b) mines are an unlawful method of implementing a blockade, c) straits specifically may never be blockaded, d) a blockade must be effective to be legal and the 'toll' undermines that.
39
[deleted] 4 days ago +5
[deleted]
5
FrankSwimGood 4 days ago +35
One has Trump Jesus
35
Xylus1985 4 days ago +11
Jesus Trump Christ!
11
Puniversefr 4 days ago +8
Dr. Donald Jesus Trump
8
Plane-Breakfast-8817 4 days ago -1
McDonald Trump 
-1
TheVoidSeeker 4 days ago +1
It's Doctor Trump Jesus, good sir!
1
faffc260 4 days ago +13
these are only targetting ships using iranian ports or paying iranian fees, aka a blockade of iran. at least going by the previous news about the blockade
13
daywall 4 days ago +18
Iran attack them without warning and target everyone that dosent come and leaves iran. The USA is blocking them and target only ships going to iran.
18
Kind_Silver_1921 4 days ago +7
US says all must go through without a toll. And during the war Iran exports can't go through. Iran says only those who paid the toll can go through and won't let us friendly ships even pay the toll. That's the difference but I don't expect listnookors posting at 1am to understand what that means
7
this_dudeagain 4 days ago +13
The US treats women a bit better and doesn't execute gay people.
13
precipice8 4 days ago +3
The US is more successful at international terrorism, while Iran is a bit more successful at domestic terrorism
3
Cigaran 4 days ago +1
The color of the flag.
1
HouseOfCosbyz 3 days ago +1
We arent going to shoot a civilian cargo ship. We board them.
1
Catch_022 4 days ago +1
The US is bigger bully - the biggest kid on the block and his father is the local cop.
1
Kind_Silver_1921 4 days ago +1
How is India different than terrorists?
1
feral0101 4 days ago -21
None, but Americans will come in here to justify it with their 2003 playbook. The Americans could nuke Israel and half the population would justify it. On the flip side, imma be making Yank vs FPV drone to dubstep songs this time next year when they’ve got boots on the ground on combat footage subs
-21
Hungry-Alfalfa511 4 days ago +1
There will be no ground troops in Iran
1
renegade_sparrow 4 days ago +4
Normally, I’d agree. Logic seems to be optional in our foreign policy these days so I suppose I wouldn’t be surprised.
4
bensonl95 4 days ago -17
USA isreal and west has killed over millions of people in Middle East i dont hear people calling any of them terrorists
-17
Sumeriandawn 4 days ago +4
You never heard anyone call Israel terrorists?😂
4
mariusherea 4 days ago +7
That is because you’re reading media controlled by them. Try to read the media from the victim’s countries.
7
faffc260 4 days ago +5
killing people isn't terrorism, killing people with the sole goal to spread fear and terror, mostly innocent civilians, is generally what is termed as terrorism
5
upmaaf 4 days ago +2
Good thing the people they killed weren’t feel fear or terror, and the killing is only to teach them freedom.
2
Hungry-Alfalfa511 4 days ago -20
It's a logical step. If the freedom of navigation is not being guaranteed by one side there is no reason the other side shouldn't do the same.
-20
SilverAgedSentiel 4 days ago +23
There's more than two sides here, We're making problems on top of problems for everyone in the world.
23
Infinite-Fig-194 4 days ago +24
Does that mean all nations are allowed to block and capture American ships as well?
24
Ok-Pair4547 4 days ago
One country is the most powerful in the world. The other countries are not
0
lostparis 4 days ago
For all their power they are looking quite impotent over this whole affair.
0
Great-Confection6760 4 days ago -13
They can try but they'll get fried
-13
PotsAndPandas 4 days ago +3
Oh I'm sure they will, just like Iran was when the ever competent CIC ordered this stupid war in the first place right?
3
Richie217 4 days ago -6
Like any spoiled toddler, the Orange Paedo has decided that if he can't have it no one can.
-6
rando1459 4 days ago +5
Are we gonna start considering and discussing what nefarious benefit this war will have for the MIC and American Isolationists yet? Or are we still regurgitating the “Trump is an idiot/madman making purely random moves with no purpose” propaganda? Some of y’all didn’t live through two Cheney presidencies and it shows.
5
hl_lost 4 days ago +113
honestly the math comment killed me lol wild that we're just casually blockading a country's ports though. like this is a pretty significant escalation and it's barely making a blip compared to whatever else is in the news cycle. the normalization of this stuff is kind of unsettling tbh
113
NotSoSalty 4 days ago +29
This is several steps behind bombing a country. It's not an escalation, it's returning to steps that should have been taken first. 
29
ev00r1 4 days ago +6
Taking out ground based defense infrastructure SHOULD have come before interdicting ships. Helicopters for boarding parties and patrol boats are easy targets compared to carrier strike groups.
6
GenericRedditor0405 3 days ago +2
Also, we really have collectively glossed over the fact that it is apparently part of the Trump administration’s foreign policy to either kidnap or assassinate heads of state whenever Trump feels like it. It’s an incredibly hostile and irregular act that somehow has been added to the pile of things that Trump is simply… allowed to do
2
ThePoetMichael 4 days ago +33
Wait till you hear about what we have been AND ARE STILL DOING to Cuba...
33
rmslashusr 4 days ago +62
If you think a naval blockade to prevent oil tankers from trading is a significant escalation over dropping bombs on girls schools you’ve really let the oil industry slip into your moral compass.
62
mindbodyproblem 4 days ago +2
I'm really more of a moral azimuth guy.
2
jdawglipp 4 days ago -14
You know what they meant. Don't be a troll
-14
rmslashusr 4 days ago +30
I honestly do not know what they meant by saying a naval blockade is a significant escalation over bombing the shit out of a country. The only thing I can come up with is that the idea that affecting trade is worse than war. Like war and killing people is fun and games, but if you start affecting profits that’s serious. Or maybe dropping bombs just doesn’t count as war at all because you don’t have to see the people you’re killing? I know they likely didn’t think about what they’re saying, but no one is thinking about it and everyone’s making the same value judgement and it’s reprehensible.
30
IbidtheWriter 4 days ago +1
Everyone is focused on oil but 70% of the region's food goes through the strait as well. A long term blockage could lead to mass starvation and the death of millions. Killing 200 children and following it up with threats to kill millions (and a whole civilization) is an escalation. Less "direct" attacks can be larger in impact than bombs sometimes.
1
rmslashusr 4 days ago +2
The war is the reason the strait is blocked, the blockade is only affecting Iranian ports. 70% of the regions food does not go through Iranian ports. The strait was closed before the blockade so Iran continuing to prevent neutral ships from transiting is not an escalation of the blockade itself.
2
IbidtheWriter 3 days ago +1
Iran was letting neutral/friendly ships through. The US blockade is affecting the entire Southern coast of Iran and not just the strait. The US blockading Iran's ports could long-term lead to mass starvation in Iran and is an escalation. Edit: I just realized you misread the article to think that Iran is escalating. The Iranian port blockade is a US escalation.
1
HonkinSriLankan 4 days ago +9
Didn’t the US just block Cuban ports too?
9
mmoonbelly 4 days ago +3
It’s not just one country. Pincer point on UAE, Saudi (eastern ports), Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait and Iraq as well
3
LateralEntry 4 days ago +1
Happened with Cuba in the 60’s
1
bobogogo1989 4 days ago +3
Happening with Cuba now
3
LateralEntry 4 days ago +1
But in the 60’s there was an actual naval blockade during the Cuban missile crisis, US ships fired on a Soviet ship
1
boogi3woogie 4 days ago +29
You know the blockade is working well when half the listnookors (bots) freak out about how the US is doomed, and the other half (humans) can’t figure out how a blockade actually works.
29
Future_Chef_939 4 days ago +23
It's actually weird how easily other countries use the internet for propaganda, if you just used listnook you would think an Iranian flag is flying over the White House after they won the war. 
23
Playful_Rip_1280 4 days ago +9
People just hate Trump, this coverage is pretty normal for basically anything that he touches lol. You just get used to it and end up ignoring a lot of media and online discussion. And I’m saying this as a foreigner.
9
rhino369 3 days ago +5
They can’t think beyond binary—black and white. They see Trump biting off more than he can chew and then conclude the US is getting militarily  defeated. When really the US military is doing shockingly well. But it’s far from good enough to get Iran to surrender. 
5
Friendly-Buy5378 3 days ago +1
Shockingly well? They've achieved nothing but f****** up the entire worlds economy. 
1
Little-Stage1948 4 days ago +59
I was told by listnook that the us couldnt do that
59
Then-Somewhere-7467 4 days ago +23
What is this war even over at this point? I can't keep up.
23
GatoLibre 3 days ago +5
We’re at war to open the straight because Iran closed the straight in response to the bombings which were necessary because of their nuclear capabilities that we ‘totally obliterated’ months ago in the ‘most successful military operation in history’ which was necessary because there wasn’t an agreement in place for the USA to monitor Iran’s nuclear capabilities which was necessary because the former agreement had to be thrown out due to its effectiveness and the fact that a Black man’s administration drafted it.
5
Cosmic_Gumbo 4 days ago +34
Epstein
34
Maskguy 4 days ago +9
Distraction and a mad man's power fantasy
9
Kurimsun 4 days ago +4
Israel
4
Hungry-Alfalfa511 4 days ago +19
I think we will see something similar to JCPOA being signed again.
19
TheGodPePe 4 days ago +47
This is pure hopium. It didn't work out for them last time. Has anything changed?
47
Doons124 4 days ago +29
This time Trump will claim it's the best deal on earth because he signed it. Even if it's the same thing, he just couldn't stand Obama taking that win. So the US will stick to it this time.
29
FantasySymphony 4 days ago +42
Trump signed the last version of NAFTA, too. Hasn't stopped him from claiming it's a bad deal.
42
ClashM 4 days ago +36
Claiming it's a bad deal *and asking what idiot made it.*
36
Alakdae 4 days ago +18
> So the US will stick to it this time. Implying that Trump will not unilaterally break a deal he signed with another country.
18
TheGodPePe 4 days ago +16
Why is everyone acting that Trump is in full control of the situation. He absolutely isn't. He can want a deal all day long, if the Iranians don't trust him than there is no deal. They will not give up nuclear ambitions, even more now.
16
sharp11flat13 4 days ago +4
> They will not give up nuclear ambitions, even more now. Yes. The best way to convince a country that it needs nukes is to attack it.
4
Alywiz 4 days ago +2
My understanding is they offered to cease for 5 years. Vance would not budge from 20 years. Obama got 15 years. I wonder why the regime wants 20 so bad…
2
SporksInjected 4 days ago +1
They’re not going to actually stop with the enriching though either way
1
HellBlazer_NQ 4 days ago +12
F****** insane that the entire world is being held to ransom because Trump has skin thinner that wet tissue and Obama once made a joke at his expense.
12
DieHardAmerican95 4 days ago +5
Once? Obama has dunked on him many times.
5
imcalledgpk 4 days ago +2
I wish he had played one on one against donny, and actually dunked on him. Maybe then trump would've f****** died and we wouldn't be in this mess now.
2
cetootski 4 days ago +1
He will be using 10mm marker tips.
1
Emotional-Dress8619 4 days ago +18
iran wont agree why would they agree to limiting their nuke production which they can use as a deterrent from future US& Israeli attacks
18
JonBoy82 4 days ago +13
Iran figured out a while back “In Process” of nuke production was the selling point to getting a seat at the table.
13
Emotional-Dress8619 4 days ago +8
exactly and trump ripping up the jcpoa was the last nail in the coffin
8
Initial_E 4 days ago +3
Nobody is keeping promises anyway. This only works if people keep promises, even if it’s just 1 party.
3
Bored2001 4 days ago +5
All reports say that Iran was keeping their end of the deal. It was the US under Trump that pulled out for no actual reason.
5
SporksInjected 4 days ago +2
The deal didn’t actually end until 2025 7 other countries plus the EU were still in the deal until 2025 Iran didn’t use the dispute resolution mechanism They didn’t renegotiate with Joe Biden in 2019 Iran had already had to remediate in 2016 over Heavy Water limits
2
Sandslinger_Eve 4 days ago +6
Iran has tried agreeing to both limitations and control of those limitations several times and the US has sabotaged the deal every time. It's on their interest to normalize relations but Israel and the US won't let them, they need the big boggy man they're created.
6
Emotional-Dress8619 4 days ago -2
people dont realize this unfortunately and think iran is just gonna make a nuke and hurl it at each and every one of their enemies
-2
LateralEntry 4 days ago +2
Hopefully the JCPOA plus Iran giving up supporting its terror proxies
2
Bored2001 4 days ago +2
Doubt itll be as good. Last time Iran got rid of 97% of their nuclear material, then Trump pulled out of the deal and betrayed them. No way they fall for that again. Trump is untrustworthy.
2
r10tm4ch1n3 4 days ago -3
wtf would they? They hold way more cards and influence than when JCPOA was negotiated and ratified. Tearing it up because Trump hate’s black men who were more liked and respected by the global political class. Last part was my take. Goog yourself the amount of revenue that was flowing into Iranian coffers when he abruptly ripped it up til now. Then add how many agreements and joint ventures they signed on to with the conflicts since then til now. Geopolitical experts have already filed this as the worst handling of any modern conflict. Trump has effectively shown the world how crucial the straight is to trade and food production, how entrenched the largest military is to outdated doctrine, and the world police status is effectively a paper tiger (much like Russia in Ukraine). It’s irreversible. The world scrambled to form different alliances and partners in record time. It’s over. And we’re not even seeing part 2 yet.
-3
jimthewanderer 4 days ago +6
Have the news figured out that they're not blockading the strait of Hormuz, and are actually patrolling further out yet?
6
DiveCat 4 days ago +2
That would require them to actually ask questions instead of just go by what “Trump/U.S. says”.
2
fiftyfivepercentoff 4 days ago +8
Release the Epstein files!!
8
Queasy_Group_4534 3 days ago +2
I wonder how much this cost us.
2
cubssux 3 days ago +2
Except Chinas ship
2
Alternative-Ad-1027 3 days ago +2
Impressive- three air carrier strike group turn back eight ship a day.
2
BigDaddyDumperSquad 4 days ago +20
But I heard the US couldn't do anything, so those ships could ram through the blockade? Did Listnook misunderstand how naval blockades work? No, it must be Trump who is wrong!
20
DiveCat 4 days ago +4
This comment aged well. Mission Accomplished! Trump is now looking forward to the big hug he is going to get from Xi.
4
Alive_Internet 4 days ago +2
Listnook is full of Chinese and Iranian bots trying to shift the narrative on this massive US win and huge China loss. I hope regular people see through it all and recognize how the US is the undisputed w***** here.
2
DiveCat 4 days ago +6
Is this why Trump is glazing Xi today and talking about how he is going to be getting a big hug from Xi? “Huge China loss”. Lol. Sure.
6
marx2k 4 days ago +3
Ah yes, this massive US win and huge China loss ...checks cost of everything...
3
BigDaddyDumperSquad 4 days ago +16
It is though. China gets a lot of oil for c**** through their Shadow Fleet that traverses the Strait of Hormuz. Blocking that severely diminishes Chinese capabilities and it forces them to either buy off the global market or help negotiate peace.
16
baseketball 4 days ago +1
You must be using a different definition of undisputed. Sure we have superior military power, but is my life better since we attacked Iran? Ask any American.
1
[deleted] 4 days ago -2
[removed]
-2
BigDaddyDumperSquad 4 days ago +10
Huh? Bot? How is saying "Listnook doesn't know what the F*** it's talking about" sucking off Trump? Because I mentioned his name? Are you that brainrotten bro?
10
Arkfoo 4 days ago -20
Not a bot, talking about how you justify the response from the US by the way you stating the above. You realise the US tried to OPEN the straight not too long ago? I've got whiplash from all the back and forth.
-20
BigDaddyDumperSquad 4 days ago +12
Saying "Listnook doesn't understand how naval blockades work" has nothing to do with whatever you're nerdraging about lil bro. Listnookors said Chinese ships would just barrel through because the US "couldn't do anything about it" without starting a hot war with China. Obviously that's not how the real world works, but...
12
my_name_is_juice 4 days ago +17
People here are ridiculous, if you mention anything relating to the US military succeding or being competent you get accused of 'sucking off Trump' or something similar, regardless of context. They don't want any actual commentary or analysis of the reality on the ground (or water as the case may be), they want every comment to be some jokey iteration of America Bad
17
BigDaddyDumperSquad 4 days ago +15
Yep. Just wish they could experience one week in Iran to see what they're really waving the flag of.
15
kgvc7 4 days ago +2
The very same strait you were trying to open…
2
yourvneckiscool 4 days ago +5
The very same pants you were returning.
5
PracticalYellow3 4 days ago +7
We’re not closing the strait. That’s fake news. We’re blocking the ports of a belligerent nation. 
7
Dphre 4 days ago +2
These different than the six that got through or?
2
SXOSXO 4 days ago
Just fly the Russian flag. I guarantee they'll let them through.
0
Accurate-Simple5662 4 days ago +8
Last time that happened the ship was chased after trying to flee, and then seized and Russia did nothing. That was about 2 months ago, maybe less, btw. But ok 👍🏼
8
Daier_Mune 4 days ago +2
And what is the goal of all this, again?
2
Juliuscesear1990 4 days ago +7
To win the war.... That they already won without the help of allies that they don't need but did ask for after attacking a country that had it's nuclear program that wasn't a threat destroyed for almost having a nuke. All done by a man who wanted the peace prize for all of his peace work who promptly invaded and attacked 2 countries and threatening multiple others with takeover.
7
wwaxwork 4 days ago +1
6 whole ships, year that's worth the millions and millions of dollars a day we're paying to do this.
1
toy187 3 days ago +1
Article has been bumped to 9 by now.
1
kacmandoth 3 days ago +1
Well each ship’s cargo is worth about $90 million dollars to Iran. So stopping 9 a day is costing them $800 million. That said, Iran normally only ships about 1.5 million barrels per day at about $10 less per barrel than traded on world market, so blockade realistically costs Iran $120-$150 million a day. Our Navy ships are going to be deployed somewhere anyways, and sailors already have salary allocated. The only real increased cost is each sailor gets like an extra $500 a month for hazard and combat theater pay. For 10,000 sailors, that is only an increased cost of about $170,000 a day for the Navy to enforce the blockade if they aren’t firing off weapons.
1
Hipsthrough100 4 days ago +1
Won’t be any headed for China getting turned around
1
Mans_Fury 4 days ago -2
We're back to Iran being the distraction again huh...
-2
Accurate-Simple5662 4 days ago +3
We’re back to using this excuse now huh…
3
37853688544788 4 days ago
Yes but how many got through because they paid their toll in bitcoin?
0
← Back to Board