> When health officials announced that one individual tested "mildly positive" on a PCR test, it raised questions about that terminology.
"mildly positive"
LOL why am I finding that so funny?
673
Zapdo0dlz17 hr ago
+247
Any pregnant person will tell you it dont matter how faint that line is!
247
RydmaUwU14 hr ago
+30
Also a drug tester. I know, you know. For reasons.
30
Relevant-Doctor18710 hr ago
-6
It does actually. Either you’re just pregnant or about to not be pregnant.
-6
TheStupendusMan16 hr ago
+56
"You've got a Hint of the Hanta."
Thanks, doc.
56
charaznable124916 hr ago
+11
Give em a dash of dried racooon p****.
11
keskeskes106615 hr ago
+4
You Sir, are a quack suggesting providing a "dash" of dried recoon p****.
Any medical professional will tell you one simply cannot find medical benefit in homeopathic doses of racoon p****. Go big or go home.
/s
4
Mountain-eagle-xray8 hr ago
+1
Hanta Hanta, dont ya want-a.
1
buzzcutbabygirl17 hr ago
+82
Because it reads the same way as “kind of pregnant.” Either you’re positive or you’re not.
82
[deleted]17 hr ago
+1
[deleted]
1
monkeyTailScientist17 hr ago
+17
Seems you either don't understand how the statistics of these test work or you don't understand the test itself. in a PCR you either get amplification or not amplification based on primers targeting a specific an unique viral sentencing (like a signature) of the virus. If the viral particle are there, then you will have amplification (positive), if the virus is not there you won't get amplification. You ran some negative and positive control at the same time just to double check that whatever you get in the result is not an artifact of the machine, or the reagents. You can't fool a PCR and you then get a "value", you get the presence or absence of amplification.
17
PlantDaddyFL13 hr ago
-1
You can amplify at such high cycle numbers that it would indicate a false positive or presence of non target dna.
-1
AuroraFinem7 hr ago
+1
Mate, 5x0 or 100000x0 is still 0, if there’s no virus there’s nothing to amplify and you’re already correcting against a set of controls to adjust for any potential contaminants or systematic errors.
1
buzzcutbabygirl17 hr ago
+6
Then they need to change the wording. If it is positive, it’s positive. If it’s not positive, it’s negative. “Mildly positive” makes little sense, but if they need to state that it’s positive with further testing needed to identify type and infectiousness, then say so. I work in medicine and words mean things, PCR cannot be “mildly positive.”
6
adbr34k17 hr ago
+53
people are being snarky about this terminology across multiple related posts about this but to be fair PCR tests used here are in fact designed to give quantitative measure of infection. The internet is allergic to nuance though
53
Granum2215 hr ago
+12
If you're doing a Western blot test for antibodies then the strength of the reaction is dependent on the number of antibodies. You'll also get weak reactions in false positives.
12
Decent-Ganache764713 hr ago
+6
Yes everyone should know this from Covid. The antigen tests were the rapid tests showed proteins and PCR tests took longer and showed if the the specific virus was present.
6
frankgjnaan15 hr ago
+4
I got into an argument with my brother about this. I'm aware a quantitative test meant to detect *levels* has a sliding scale. But a "hantavirus test" in and of itself implies a binary positive/negative. Otherwise specifying that it's a test to detect more than just if the virus is present or not is (IMHO) an important distinction.
4
poopdotorg17 hr ago
+34
I don't know, but a lot of people were questioning it in another thread. Some viral tests have quantitative results (not just a "yes or no"). If a person is barely above the threshold for positivity, they could be mildly positive whereas another sample could be much higher. Some tests even have gray areas where you are somewhere between positive and negative and the assay suggests to retest if results fall in that zone.
34
ailish17 hr ago
+28
I think it's just that there's a small viral load, most likely early in the infection. There's no such thing as "mildly positive" in the scientific community.
28
M155y14 hr ago
+7
Mildly positive is definitely a weird term, but if this is a qPCR test that they're using, it truly might just be that they're barely below the negative threshold, which does hold some nuance to whether someone is actually positive for the virus or not. I think it's fair to treat it at a tentative positive considering the circumstances, but we can also have scientific nuance and recognize the limitations of these test methods.
7
ailish14 hr ago
+8
A "tentative positive" makes way more sense than "mildly positive."
8
SpiritualB0x316 hr ago
+3
I mildly sure about this lukewarm data. This is how science is communicated in high impact journals /s.
3
ailish16 hr ago
+2
Me, or the BBC calling it "mildly positive?"
2
Gwarnage17 hr ago
+12
Its a complete contradiction in terms.
12
sealsarescary16 hr ago
+3
Cuz our health department is a joke
3
RoyalZeal17 hr ago
+5
Its the same language theyve used to minimize the destructive effects of covid for the last 6 years.
5
petmoo2313 hr ago
+1
I took it to mean 'low viral load', but that was just me inferring. I wonder wtf it actually means.
1
ArbitraryMeritocracy10 hr ago
+1
Why did they wait to take the tests?
1
Canadian-Man-infj17 hr ago
-2
Sorta, kinda, maybe, possibly, a little bit positive.
-2
CaterpillarJungleGym14 hr ago
Glass half full
0
specialvillain12 hr ago
It's kind of like buffalo wings. mildly positive is below mediumly or hotly positive and well below nuclearly positive.
0
Kimber97617 hr ago
+303
Every headline lately feels like a pandemic flashback
303
blackweebow17 hr ago
+194
That's why they are writing these headlines like this. They are hoping your ptsd from COVID will generate more views despite this not being nearly as transmissible or novel.
194
LittleKitty23516 hr ago
+80
A number of experts have said the virus is more transmissible than the public is being led to believe.
Given the ships doctor became infected, and that the responders went to the ship with full hazmat suits on, I think the idea that intimate contact is needed to spread the virus in some bullshit.
80
MoistDadBod16 hr ago
+83
It kills 30-50% of people who contract it. That’s why they’re wearing full sealed suits.
83
1ncest_is_wincest10 hr ago
+10
If Plague Inc taught me anything about Epidemiology and the spread of diseases, it's that the more lethal a disease is the less likely it will spread.
10
tonitalksaboutit7 hr ago
+12
Couldn't play that game anymore after COVID. I kept getting mad about how my silly little phone game doctors and governments were responding better than my actual government and doctors.
12
MarioMan12132457656 hr ago
+1
Our government responded more like the game Project Planet lol
1
khinzaw9 hr ago
+4
30-50% of people who have symptoms bad enough to go to the hospital. It's an important distinction. Still bad though, obviously.
4
LittleKitty23516 hr ago
-34
If it doesn't spread easily person to person there should be nothing to worry about.
For example you don't need a hazmat suit to go into a room full of people with HIV. Clearly it spreads in a manner more similar to the flu than not.
-34
Tessablu14 hr ago
+11
You think it’s “bullshit” that a doctor could possibly be in close contact with a symptomatic person whom they are treating for an infectious disease?
11
LittleKitty23514 hr ago
+4
I think you misunderstood me. I think the media reporting that the disease is not easily spread is bullshit when the ships doctor became infected, the experts they sent to the ship wore hazmat suits, and the science says the variant of the disease is known to spread human to human via respiratory droplets.
4
Tessablu14 hr ago
+7
Spreading human to human does not make a disease highly transmissible, and the doctor was certainly exposed to it in enormous quantities. And hazmat suits are simply good practice when boarding a vessel on which human-to-human transmission of a potentially deadly disease may be actively occurring.
The virus has been on that ship for more than a month, and I myself was on the Hondius recently- if it was a highly contagious illness, we would be seeing *many* more cases. It’s a very small ship and people are constantly in close contact with each other. That apparently only two of the remaining 87 passengers tested positive on PCR is a great sign that the infection was already pretty much contained. It’s not a particularly well-studied strain, but this is congruent with prior outbreaks as well.
7
LittleKitty23513 hr ago
+2
None of this contradicts what I said about the media’s misrepresentation of how the disease spreads. Intimate contact is not the only means
2
Tessablu13 hr ago
-1
I don’t know what to tell you, man. The media isn’t some monolith working to keep the truth from getting out. If anything, they benefit more from widespread panic. The line between “intimate contact” and “person you sat elbow-to-elbow with repeatedly at dinner” just isn’t thick enough to merit the disclaimer.
-1
Kimber97615 hr ago
true but still feels alarmist
0
odishy17 hr ago
+25
It's important to remember this is very very different. Hantavirus doesn't spread very easy, so no need to horded toilet paper... Yet
25
c_rizzle5316 hr ago
+22
There was a video posted earlier of a news panel with an expert that said this phrasing isnt exactly correct and it actually can spread fairly quickly. He noted past reasearch and a couple cases where one in particular, someone at a bday party just saying hello in passing with no other interraction infected someone. He also said there isnt a lot of info on this current Andes strain too, complicating things.
Idk, I dont think people should panic but at least should take it seriously. We know people will hear "cant pass easily", and then go out and about claiming you cant catch it anyway infecting a whole host of other people.
22
odishy15 hr ago
+9
This is fair, I should be more careful. But also... With COVID a person walked through a room, half the room is infected so perspective is important.
9
Kimber97615 hr ago
fair better to stay cautious without panicking
0
Warstorm199317 hr ago
+18
And also, if this virus go full pandemic, it will be a lot more scary and deadly than Covid because it have a lethality of 35-40% for symptomatics cases.
18
ailish17 hr ago
+9
So, hoard toilet paper or not?
/s just kidding everyone
9
unpluggedcord17 hr ago
+7
Which is why it won’t.
7
adbr34k17 hr ago
+21
Patient Zero and One were apparently able to infect at least 6 others between them before dying so let’s not rule anything out
21
Ok_Kick487116 hr ago
+17
It's great how people are so sure of this situation that is still developing and totally not possible of getting wrong, even by experts.
17
unpluggedcord14 hr ago
Do you not trust the WHO?
0
Ok_Kick487114 hr ago
+5
Absolutely not
5
Show_Me_Your_Cubes15 hr ago
+5
I don't think the contact tracing has concluded. At this point, it's just as likely that the same rat infected these people as a person to person event.
5
adbr34k15 hr ago
+7
Unless i’ve missed some recent developments, common theory at this point is that Patients Zero and One contracted it from a landfill-adjacent area they went birding at on a pre-cruise road trip. While rats contaminating foodstuffs on cruise ships would be a realistic and optimistic option here, the timing doesn’t seem to support it given Hanta has a weeks-long incubation and they presented symptoms within the first week of the cruise
7
Kimber97615 hr ago
sounds plausible, but still speculative without confirmed tracing
0
Warstorm199317 hr ago
+1
Most virus get less lethal as their infection rate rise. The exception for high lethality virus is asymptomatic propagation combine with long incubation rate and/or strong survavibility outside of an host. For exemple, it was what make small pox such a plague until we were able to create a vaccine for it.
1
Kimber97615 hr ago
+2
generally true but it varies a lot by virus
2
Rurumo66616 hr ago
+6
5% of the people on that ship contracted it, making it HIGHLY transmissible.
6
Sideview_play15 hr ago
+2
unless you think people will hoard and that will still cause a shortage...
2
odishy15 hr ago
+5
Shhh... I'm stocking up after work tonight, so don't tell folks until tomorrow.
5
Kimber97615 hr ago
+1
agrees, transmission rate matters more than headlines
1
TuckerCarlsonsOhface17 hr ago
+9
Remember when trump announced he finally tested negative after his COVID treatment by saying he “tested very positively”?
9
Kimber97615 hr ago
+1
yeah, that was a memorable slip
1
reila_go14 hr ago
+1
Surprise! The latest pandemic never ended.
1
wuhkay12 hr ago
That's why I play the game Plague Inc.
0
RayzTheRoof12 hr ago
-1
Meanwhile it's incredibly insignificant. This isn't going to spread like that, it just can't. These are just people who got sick from a viral spread on a ship. It's a rare condition, but it's not going to become anything. But headlines gonna headline because written media needs clicks.
-1
NEBZ12 hr ago
+26
Damn, how did they get that ship to Nebraska.
26
CaptainObvious1102 hr ago
+1
up the platte of course.
1
DestructicusDawn17 hr ago
+162
I'm going to highly encourage anyone that wants to take Ivermectin this time to take it.
162
pikpikcarrotmon16 hr ago
+44
If you're skeptical about receiving a vaccine for it... Great! I recommend attending a large, dense gathering of like-minded individuals so you can all discuss it at length.
44
keskeskes106615 hr ago
+2
Be sure to bring your elderly and very young family members.
Prominant influencers say a community gathering of self-identified natually immune folks creates a lifetime peptide positive vibe that can protct from Covid, alopecia, smallpox and 155 mm artillery rounds.
/s
2
bedroomblogger10 hr ago
+2
Will it kill me? I’ll only take it if you promise it will kill me this time
2
bryanoens16 hr ago
+2
I have a decent supply of bleach so I'm safe
2
Nandulal16 hr ago
+12
Huh, BBC reported on the world service radio this morning that they were not quarantining the US passengers at all.
12
darshfloxington12 hr ago
+11
They are quarantining any that have symptoms or prolonged close contact. The rest are just under observation
11
SecretJaccuzzi6 hr ago
+4
We’re so so so so so so screwed
4
StrawberryDulcet17 hr ago
+74
This is a good start, but there are other Americans currently in the US that were on the plane to South Africa with patient 0’s dead body and his wife who was sick and symptomatic at the time (she died shortly after that flight after being kicked off of her next flight for being too sick).
Those people on those two planes should be quarantined as well.
My governor just said we’re keeping an eye on them (they’re in my state and some others) but they’re not quarantined.
74
Galrafloof17 hr ago
+23
Where are they quarantining in Georgia? CDC Headquarters?
23
Background-Taro263717 hr ago
+29
Emory! Same place they quarantined the ebola patients
29
Jjjohn040416 hr ago
+13
Which is right next to CDC
13
Background-Taro263716 hr ago
+8
Yes buttttt emory is a private college. They work with the CDC but they are their own entity. Important distinction
8
Phteven_j16 hr ago
+9
Yeah... I live near a Kroger. We get mixed together sometimes since I eat food and they sell food.
9
Valuable-Benefit-5249 hr ago
+1
I was under the impression the CDC & Emory are pretty incestuous (e.g., secondary appointments for CDC at Emory and Emory students can do their PhD at CDC labs) , but my memory might be fuzzy b/c my interview there was ~10 years ago. Also immunology and infectious disease are outside of my research interests so I just tuned it out.
1
CaterpillarJungleGym14 hr ago
+2
Why is the other person in Nebraska?! They should all be near the freaking CDC.
2
regretableedibles13 hr ago
+11
Because Nebraska has UNMC which has the NQU (National Quarantine Unit).
11
CaterpillarJungleGym13 hr ago
+2
Oh wow, thanks I didn't know! Now I have to go down a rabbit hole. Just to know is it govmt funded or private?
2
regretableedibles13 hr ago
+4
The NQU is federally funded. When Ebola and Covid hit, people got sent to Nebraska. It’s not UNMC’s first dog and pony show.
UNMC itself is a mix of funding, but much of it comes from the federal government.
4
CaterpillarJungleGym13 hr ago
+2
They still have their funding? That's awesome
2
margery-meanwell15 hr ago
+2
Just a guess, probably quarantining at their homes. Leaving, family, and visitors aren’t supposed to be allowed, but it’s an honor system.
2
doninside17 hr ago
-8
Joe Rogan's studio, with an heavy rotation of many live guests
-8
jethroguardian17 hr ago
-4
Don't give me hope like that.
-4
BeastofPostTruth16 hr ago
+24
If you want to track it [map](https://www.arcgis.com/apps/dashboards/5c68442d2afc42d7ba2696e4cd393729)
24
Abranimal17 hr ago
+29
Why? Donny give them their liberty back! Kiss them on the mouth! Own the libs /s
29
Knightrider31917 hr ago
+13
They’re probably too old for him.
13
ShagCarpetGuy17 hr ago
+37
I just asked my wife “why aren’t these people 50 miles off the US coast?”
I have recently heard this isn’t ‘suppose to be’ as bad as COVID, but my god. Why even flirt with this??? Bringing them to the middle of our country, what could possibly go f****** wrong 🤦♂️
37
__Kegheimer__17 hr ago
+83
Nebraska has one of the premier rare disease hospitals. We ~~treat~~ cure Ebola and had one of the first batches of covid patients.
Being in the middle of the country means you are equally distant from many places. And we have a smaller airport so getting in and out with a private charter is easy.
These guys aren't being put up in a Holiday Inn. They are going straight to a hazmat ICU.
83
UltraNoahXV16 hr ago
+15
That's reassuring to hear honestly
15
__Kegheimer__12 hr ago
+7
Yeah we made the news for flying the American who caught Ebola in Africa to Nebraska. He lived.
7
ffghtffyrdmns16 hr ago
+8
yea the hospital in Nebraska is built for high-consequence infectious disease, and the people who work there know what they're doing.
8
Flash_ina_pan16 hr ago
+9
That's good to hear, I kind of assumed with the current CDC they'd be flown through every major airport in the country and told to lick all the door handles in some sort of "Own the Libs, Personal Freedom 500" tour.
9
ailish17 hr ago
+15
It's not as bad because it doesn't spread nearly as easily, but the death rate is much higher. It's not nearly as likely to become a pandemic, but not impossible, and if it does were in much bigger trouble then we were with covid. If anyone can f*** it up it's this administration.
15
CaterpillarJungleGym14 hr ago
+5
The incubation period is worrisome to me. But I don't think we will get to COVID Pandemic levels of spread.
5
ailish14 hr ago
+2
I don't think so either, unless we as a species are completely idiotic about letting it spread that much. The way several governments around the world handled covid worries me (yes, the US is very high on that list), but maybe we learned something from what happened with covid? Or maybe I'm just coping lol.
2
CaterpillarJungleGym14 hr ago
+1
I'm in NJ. It was really bad up here and in NY. Everyone know someone who died. I remember the refrigeration trucks outside of NYC hospitals because all of the dead bodies wouldn't fit in the morgue. By me, I'm sure people will be masking up soon. We're assholes but we care about our families and community. "Don't be a d***" should be the Jersey state motto.
Edit: Or "Get your head outta your ass."
1
ailish14 hr ago
+3
I'm in Michigan, and there were refrigeration trucks in the Detroit area. I'm in the west side of the state and it didn't get that bad here, but it was bad enough. The hospitals were extremely full, and the other medical centers were insane. Compound that with this being a pretty conservative area and there was a ton of controversy around masking and the vaccines, and the lockdowns oh my god. It was like people's lives were over because they couldn't get their hair done.
3
Fanticide17 hr ago
+22
Because it is now the official stance of the us government that vaccines are worse than the disease. It’s also the official position of the federal government that everything is fine until it isn’t, in which case Joe Biden personally ruined it for you before leaving office and it’s also your fault for even having an issue in the first place.
22
sawyouoverthere16 hr ago
+8
There are no vaccines for hantavirus
8
darshfloxington12 hr ago
+3
There is. It’s required for members of the South Korean military.
3
Fanticide16 hr ago
+4
Yes, I am aware of that. I was highlighting the fact that the federal government has done more to prevent people from getting vaccines than they have done to prevent people from getting sick. They don’t care about disease, they care about selling supplements and pseudoscience to the dumbest people on the planet. Then when things go wrong they blame everyone else for their incompetence.
4
G0B1GR3D16 hr ago
-1
At least we have Big Pharma with our best interests at heart.
-1
Fanticide16 hr ago
+1
And don’t forget those selfless insurance agencies who would never deny treatment to people in need to boost profits.
1
Tweetydabirdie14 hr ago
+2
Can you please clarify in which way Biden supposedly ruined things? Not that I’m disputing it specifically, but what exact policy etc are you referring too?
2
Fanticide14 hr ago
+9
According to republicans Biden ruined anything and everything that they need an excuse for. They blamed him for the cost of gas from the war they started. They blamed spirit airlines going under from the oil shock on Biden. Last year they blamed Biden for the failed fema responses even though they changed the rules so noem herself had to approve any response. Republicans blamed Biden for the rise in inflation caused by tariffs they put in place. They will say out of one side of their mouth about how the economy is the best it’s ever been, but then blame Biden for job numbers missing the mark in 2026. If you can think of something going wrong, there is a republican blaming Biden for it.
9
Tweetydabirdie13 hr ago
+1
Ah. Sorry I was a bit slow.
1
ballsmigue17 hr ago
+3
To be fair I dont think they would have the medical care necessary to treat them out there and they would most certainly die then..
3
figgyputtin17 hr ago
Don’t know where you’re hearing that it’s not as bad. The mortality rates are worse.
0
Abranimal17 hr ago
+10
Transmission rate is not nearly as high as Covid.
10
echoshizzle17 hr ago
+10
It appears this virus spreads differently. So “not as bad” from an “oh shit sanitize everything!” standpoint
10
sawyouoverthere16 hr ago
+2
Covid wasn’t so much sanitize everything either. Masking and vaccines were most effective
2
berlinflowers16 hr ago
+1
Lol, yep those first few weeks when we were literally Clorox wiping packages was fun
1
ASmallTownDJ17 hr ago
There was a health official sometime last week that said it probably won't be as worrisome because it doesn't spread through the air as easily as covid did. But good lord I hope they're right.
0
figgyputtin17 hr ago
+12
Unfortunately I don’t have much faith in our country handling this the right way given everything we’ve pulled out of and who we have heading our health services. I’d say it’s worrisome enough that we’ve already got it in the States, we are in arguably a much worse position now than we were when COVID started.
12
ASmallTownDJ16 hr ago
+6
Oh definitely. Hearing Trump say "just don't worry, it'll work itself out soon" or whatever, *again,* definitely doesn't instill confidence.
6
figgyputtin16 hr ago
+4
Believe me I absolutely want this to blow over. But I just have no faith in our “leadership”. And the fact that we have more time with Trump’s admin this time vs last time….yikes.
4
Boomshtick4147 hr ago
+2
>I’d say it’s worrisome enough that we’ve already got it in the States, we are in arguably a much worse position now than we were when COVID started.
Only reported cases are those who were on the cruise and are already contact-traced and in isolation. The few who came back early from the cruise are not symptomatic.
From the NYC Dept of Health:
>The Andes strain has shown limited person-to-person transmission in prolonged and close-contact settings. Secondary infections among healthcare workers have previously been documented in healthcare facilities. No other hantavirus strains, including those circulating in North America, have demonstrated person-to-person transmission. People with the disease typically develop symptoms 4–42 days after exposure and are considered infectious only while symptomatic.
E.g., if you're not symptomatic, you're not contagious. Anyone who *might* become symptomatic is being monitored. There have been zero in-the-wild cases in the US so I don't know what you're talking about when you say "we've already got it in the US." We brought American citizens and residents abroad home and put them into isolation. That's it.
To put a finer point on all of this, human-to-human transmission is much lower rate than Covid. The two aren't comparable. From CNN:
>“Probably we are having less than – I don’t know, I’m giving you a number, just for a ballpark number – 300 cases in history” of human to human transmission of Andes virus and about 3,000 Andes cases overall, Palacios said. He is also part of a group of experts advising on the ongoing cruise ship outbreak.
>Based on their investigation of the Epuyen outbreak, which involved three separate superspreader events – where a single person passed the infection to several others – Palacios said the window for transmission of the Andes virus appears to be short, about a day. People are at their peak of infectiousness on the day they develop a fever.
>\[...\]
>In the Epuyen outbreak, more than 80 healthcare workers were exposed to patients with symptoms, but none was directly infected themselves, though very few used any personal protective equipment. There were two infected healthcare workers at the local rural hospital, a smaller facility, which may have been the first to see sick patients.
>The limited spread among healthcare workers in the Epuyen outbreak speaks to the short window of time that a person may be infectious, experts said.
>“This is not Covid. This is really not Covid. It’s not even influenza. It’s an unusual person-to-person event, and it might have happened because, perhaps, of a closed environment on a ship,” said Dr. Lucille Blumberg, an infectious disease specialist who is the former deputy director of the National Institute for Communicable Diseases in South Africa, of the cruise ship outbreak.
I say all of this while acknowledging your point that the CDC has been hamstrung, but there's absolutely nothing right now that suggests any reason for broad concern. The media is hyping this up as clickbait but that's empirically disproportionate to the actual risk to the public at large here.
2
figgyputtin7 hr ago
+2
I appreciate this.
2
Leather_Battle22967 hr ago
+1
Sorry bud, it’s really hard to view your comment as worth consideration when you misuse e.g., in place of what should be i.e.
Edit: [I suppose I should also say that asymptomatic spread may be possible despite previous understanding.](https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/may/11/evacuated-us-and-french-mv-hondius-cruise-ship-passengers-test-positive-for-hantavirus)
1
Boomshtick4146 hr ago
+2
Please forgive me. You are correct and I shall now fall on my sword and commit ~~kama sutra~~ seppuku.
2
Leather_Battle22966 hr ago
+1
As you should. At least you will die with dignity.
1
pdlbean17 hr ago
+2
That combined with lower transmission rate actually makes a pandemic event much, much less likely
2
Nandulal16 hr ago
+1
yeah except for that pesky eight week incubation period...
1
pdlbean16 hr ago
+3
No evidence exists to suggest is spreads asymptomatically
3
Nandulal16 hr ago
+2
I'm glad that absence of evidence equals fact then. Thanks!
2
pdlbean15 hr ago
That is just simply not how the world works.
0
Remarkable-Nerve147217 hr ago
+1
Not as easliy transmissible
1
Be_quiet_Im_thinking17 hr ago
It will only kill the frontline workers because it’s so much easier for everyone else to not catch hantavirus. /s
0
MortimerDongle17 hr ago
It's a very serious disease but human to human transmission is limited. If this strain is observed to have much higher transmission then that would be bad. But unless it can spread easily among strangers that aren't in a confined space for weeks, probably not that bad.
0
Boomshtick41417 hr ago
Transmission rate is much lower and someone is basically only contagious for a very short period. Human to human transmission generally requires prolonged close contact.
Its orders of magnitude lower risk to a large population than Covid was even if the mortality rate for individual symptomatic cases is higher.
0
Domeil17 hr ago
+2
Because they're rich.
This wasnt some carnival cruise, tickets for this boat started at $7.5k, so just like when those billionaires climbed into that carbon fiber submarine a couple years back, the government is pulling out all the stops, bending as many rules as possible, to make sure our aristocrats are as comfortable as they can be.
2
redline8316 hr ago
+7
You don't have to be rich to go on this cruise. They certainly do not have to be rich enough for any government or anyone to care who they are. Might be a stretch for most, but it's not like the actual influential rich are on a boat like this.
7
Flimsy-Sprinkles733117 hr ago
It's even more frustrating when you realize there are hospital ships that could have been dispatched to the cruise ship.
0
rclonecopymove16 hr ago
+5
Where are the hospital ships? How long would it have taken to get there. How are they equipped? Would it be appropriate for the situation?
5
Flimsy-Sprinkles733116 hr ago
-1
They would have been perfect for this exact situation.
https://youtube.com/shorts/bk2RTx-kXJo?is=pb7HbTK3Klha7dZD
They were utilized during COVID: https://www.northcom.mil/Newsroom/News/Article/Article/2134920/navy-hospital-ships-helping-in-covid-19-response/
-1
rclonecopymove15 hr ago
+4
Of course a YouTube link.
4
Nandulal16 hr ago
+1
nah that hospital ship is needed in Greenland last I heard. I assume we only have the one and it is Dear Leader's toy.
1
Flimsy-Sprinkles733114 hr ago
+2
There are at least two: THE USNS Comfort and The USNS Mercy
2
Nandulal14 hr ago
+1
a joke
1
Starkville11 hr ago
+6
There’s one in NYC now. Great.
— New Yorker
6
CaptainObvious1102 hr ago
+1
that sucks
1
Toddcraft6 hr ago
+2
40 day incubation period btw
2
CaptainObvious1102 hr ago
+1
oh wow.
1
Pour_Me_Another_13 hr ago
+5
Not that I think this is as contagious as covid, but just for the sake of imagination, it would be funny imagining the covidiots insisting upon all of us catching Hantavirus because it's woke not to.
who wants to bet they won't stay in quarantine for a full 40 days?
1
zmunky17 hr ago
-4
Dude they need to be kept on montauk island for such time they can confirm they do not present a contagious viral load.
-4
MasterLJ17 hr ago
-17
Haven't they been through enough?
EDIT: This was a joke about quarantining in Georgia. Apparently, a bad one. I accept the L. Stay home if you're sick folks! Quarantining is the ethical thing to do.
-17
Buris17 hr ago
+11
They should be quarantined for 8 weeks. It sounds rough but this is how you do it so that a small deadly infection doesn't become an event that's 10-20x as deadly as covid. It's obvious this strain does in fact spread human to human and that it's not as hard to spread as they first claimed.
11
adbr34k17 hr ago
+8
haven’t we all been through enough? Quarantine is absolutely the correct response, the fact that they were able to repatriate at all is a concession in my opinion.
8
rclonecopymove16 hr ago
+1
What should they have done? Left them on the boat?
1
TheForeverUnbanned17 hr ago
+5
Screw that these Typhoid Marys should be in a pressurized box for two months. Sucks to be you man but Jesus Christ I can’t do another multi year pandemic bullshit fest
5
rclonecopymove16 hr ago
+2
Negative pressure not positive pressure room isn't it?
2
TheForeverUnbanned14 hr ago
+1
Sure, I guess, but we could always.. you know, squish. No more hantavirus
1
rclonecopymove16 hr ago
+1
I laughed.
Quarantine: when someone might have been exposed and they are kept away from people because they may have it.
Isolation: they have it and are being kept away from people because they are sick.
1
freedfg17 hr ago
-9
Why are they being quarantined?
Maga has already decided this is all fake and we should do nothing about it?
Err....or are they saying "they" are intentionally starting another pandemic....er..or the pandemic is fake...but they're pretending it's real...to..umm. control? Us? Not Trump though, no no. No he's umm. He's not in charge...OF THAT. HES NOT IN CHARGE OF THAT
-9
rclonecopymove16 hr ago
+3
Quarantine suggests they are not sick just being kept away from people until everyone is sure that they don't have it even though they may have been exposed.
People who are infected are isolated not quarantined.
172 Comments