The first Trump presidency was a bad cold. The second looks more like a chronic disease.
Europe can’t afford to assume the US will just ‘go back to normal’ every four years while a far-right president can come back and undo everything again.
This isn’t a temporary glitch anymore. Europe is learning that the problem isn’t just Trump, but the fact that a huge part of the American electorate either backs him or is willing to tolerate him
261
nishitd3 days ago
+96
Yup. They elected him twice. The second time with even more votes. They have decided it's what they want. It's not accident or shock or temporary any more. This is the path America has chosen for good
96
socialistrob3 days ago
+25
And military rearmaments take years. If you order more air defense systems today or more planes today there's a good chance they won't be ready until 2029 or 2030 at the soonest. If European countries had reacted to Trump's first win by scaling up their militaries they would be in a lot better position to support Ukraine and they wouldn't be as dependent on the US today as they are. As frustrating as it is for Europe to be dependent on the US now it would be much worse if we get to 2030 and we're still having this same conversation.
25
SpaceTimeChallenger3 days ago
-54
I think we underestimate how crazy the democrats have gotten also.
I think many Trump supporters actually just wants to be friends with Europe but for them the domestic politics are more important.
I have not given up on the US finding middle ground again
-54
PatientInitial8823 days ago
+12
Well, the problem is whether that middle ground will stay middle ground.
Right now, we're lucky in a way. Putin already has his hands tied in Ukraine. But in ten years time, and the leader of a re-armed Russia wants to make a go at the Baltics, then all they have to do is wait two or three years for a new Trump. The very moment they elect the next a****** the USA's part of NATO becomes worthless.
It's like guarding a house only on weekdays, while announcing to the world that the house will be unguarded on the weekends. All the burglar has to do is wait until the weekend starts, so that guard might as well not be there at all. And if a guard like that is pretty pointless, then why do we bother dealing with his demands?
12
ChoPT3 days ago
+21
How have the Democrats gotten “crazy?”
21
DisastrousAcshin3 days ago
+24
Just another 'both sides' dismissal of how much trouble Trump is causing for the world
24
mschuster913 days ago
-25
The old guard is corrupt AF and the young ones tend to be raging antisemites.
No issue with being against Netanyahu or that clusterfuck of a war - but yikes, some cross every red line there is when it comes to Israel.
-25
SpaceTimeChallenger3 days ago
-36
I believe uncontrolled immigration, resistance towards common sense topics like voter ID and ridicolous woke policies (trans men in women sports, dumb DEI hires and stuff like that).
I'm not saying its that big things and what Trump is doing is way worse of course, but when they start focus more on the things that most moderate people care about they may get a chance again
-36
HealthIndustryGoon3 days ago
+19
"uncontrolled immigration" - early giveaway that your news sources are those who couldn't legally call themselves "news" and the rest of your post just affirms that you are a product of the rightwing media outrage machine.
19
InsensitiveClod763 days ago
+22
They don't focus on these things.
The right wing media tells you, that this is what the Democrats focus on.
22
SpaceTimeChallenger3 days ago
-27
But they do oppose voter id. They do implement woke policies, they picked a terribly unpopular president candidate from 2020 as their president candidate because she was a woman and black.
-27
Crilde3 days ago
+4
I think Kamala was more of a "they didn't have much choice" situation. Remember, initially it was supposed to be her and Joe Biden running for re-election before Joe dropped out late in the election cycle. I'm pretty sure that by the point he dropped out it was too late to run a primary and deal with unwinding the original campaign (something about campaign finance rules, I think there would have been issues using the Biden-Harris donations for whoever the new nominee would be) so they just had to make the best of a bad situation.
Granted, Joe could have maybe been a bit more self aware before primary season came and went.
4
SpaceTimeChallenger3 days ago
-4
Thats another thing, that they didnt remove Biden which was obviously unfit for office but kept saying he was Ok, was a really bad choice
-4
Potential-Wish86083 days ago
+9
And Fanta Führer is fit for office?😅😅😅😅
9
drunkenbrawler3 days ago
+6
The democrats are a centre party by almost any measure. The political polarization in the USA is just so crazy that the right wing looks at them like baby eaters.
6
[deleted]3 days ago
-20
[removed]
-20
No_Condition73743 days ago
+5
There's always an excuse.
5
HangingPothos_3 days ago
+5
Its not bots mate (or maybe its both). But seriously. Actions have consequences and i'd really love to believe that Trump wasnt voted in legitimately, but unfortunately I know enough about certain red states first hand to know that he is widely supported many places.
I get that its probably frustrating to watch the rest of the world turn on the country you value, especially if you yourself dont support trump. But it doesnt take away culpability of the masses unfortunately, and you cant blame the rest of the world for observing and turning their backs. Your comment makes it sound like that isn't warranted, but a quick and honest review of the situation suggests otherwise. It sucks that the chosen figurehead is doing this, but dont misdirect that blame.
Also I realize many Americans dont support Trump so that isn't lost on me.
5
ScrotumScrapings3 days ago
+6
>it turns out all USA's allies were eager and willing to play along and turn their backs.
How so? Can you argue that it is moral and decent to support the yanks these days?
6
FoulMoodeternal3 days ago
+6
Honey, I’ve lived in the Midwest and the South. Yes, a lot, if not most, Americans enthusiastically support this. Racism is the most fundamental element of American culture there is. If it weren’t, we wouldn’t have needed a civil war or a civil rights movement or any of it. America has *had* to make strides toward equality because it has been viciously opposed by a major minority for centuries. This is exactly what America is. This is just the latest iteration of it
6
HealthIndustryGoon3 days ago
+8
trump's first term was covid: highly unpleasant but kept largely under control by people who actually knew what they were doing. his second term is malignant melanoma: cut it out now or death is on the line.
8
wswordsmen3 days ago
+10
Let's pretend that Europe can count on no more than a 4 year period of the US going crazy. Then Europe still couldn't count on the US because the enemy we will call "Russia" could attack at the start of the 4 year period and they would still have to last 4 years until the US will be able to help.
That said staying in NATO and having the US in NATO is still the best defense against an American invasion. No one seems to realize that or at least talk about it.
10
zoopz3 days ago
+1
Yea.. no. This is wishful thinking as well. America has gone mad. Trump wanted to invade an Ally.
1
wswordsmen3 days ago
+2
And was forced to back down, likely by the military. Legally, attacking Greenland is the equivalent of attacking New York. There is no ambiguity to if the US military is allowed to attack a NATO member.
2
2910006104780213 days ago
+9
It's actually a huge flaw in *democracy*. Like you said, what does it matter if I strike a deal with one administion if the next in 4 years is just going to undo it?
Russia's entire policy since the fall of the USSR was to destabilize the US from within. With the rise of the internet, bot farms spreading misinformation.... they did it. They exposed democracy.
9
Rhythm-Amoeba3 days ago
+4
The core problem for the EU is that they are extremely reliant on the US being in NATO for their own defense needs. Much of Europe's military capabilities still pale in comparison to the US and they only recently started investing in getting caught up to speed. Even still though they are reliant on US weapons manufacturing
4
Koala_eiO3 days ago
+3
Is it not because France and UK (not EU anymore, I know) have nukes?
3
Rhythm-Amoeba3 days ago
+1
Even though they have nukes that's not how wars are fought in the modern era. Russia has nukes too but they can't use them because the first person to drop a nuke is getting nuked by everyone else. You still need conventional arms
1
TheAngryGoat3 days ago
> Even though they have nukes that's not how wars are fought in the modern era.
Having nukes isn't how wars are fought in the modern era, you're right. It's how they're not fought.
Any nation not currently developing a nuclear arsenal doesn't deserve to call itself a country. Having the ability to immediately cause any nation invading you to cease existing is the ultimate security.
If Iran had managed to complete their nuclear program they would have been safe from American imperialism. They will now quite rightly be more determined than ever.
0
[deleted]3 days ago
[deleted]
0
tree_boom3 days ago
+4
> The only concern is actually how much we depend on the US military industrial complex, it's a pitty that Germany bought F35 and want to leave the next gen fighter plane project
It's not a pity that they bought F-35 - that puts them in a much stronger position than waiting another 15 years for equivalent capability. They don't want to leave FCAS, it just seems that they and France cannot get along on it.
4
nicebaot3 days ago
+2
1st time was an STD
2nd time is terminal cancer
2
Soylentgruen3 days ago
+3
Trump was elected twice with Russian help.
3
TheAngryGoat3 days ago
+2
We do need to give russia more credit for winning the cold war, or rather getting the US to willingly concede and puppet itself.
As the republican t-shirt slogan says "I'd rather be russian than a democrat". You got your wish.
2
True_Window_93893 days ago
+1
Also that the billionaires and corporate leaders seem to be all-in on oligarchy. I do think a huge portion of America supports or goes along with Trump, but I also think it’s less relevant today. The real power is with the oligarchs, and even what passes for democracy is just a game of dumping money and manipulating people.
1
TheAngryGoat3 days ago
+1
The US is has proven itself to be a fundamentally and inherently corrupt nation of fundamentally and inherently corrupt people. There's no coming back from that within at least a generation or two.
Europe need to completely militarily, politically, socially, economically isolate themselves from the US. Nothing good is to be found there.
1
SanyChiwa3 days ago
+161
As painful as it is, Europe really needs to divorce from the US. They've done enough damage and conflict in the world.
The only time NATO was used, it was to help the US in return they threatened to invade Greenland.
The US is not an ally and will probably not help if a NATO country is being invaded.
161
Brief_Hospital_17663 days ago
+77
The US is not only not an ally, they are an active belligerent to every value European nations stand for. Values we have held dear since the Enlightenment. We have the technology and resources to make this change happen, the question is whether we have the political will.
77
TtotheC813 days ago
+45
Pretty much this. America has stated it seeks to empower far-right Governments within Europe, with the long-term aim to break up the EU, allowing American corporations to predate European countries, piecemeal. American neo-feudalism is attempting to metastasise and infect a healthier host, in that respect.
You only have to see how the U.S is openly trying to ensure Viktor Orbán is re-elected to see this in effect. If they can ensure Hungary remains a thorn in the side of the EU, it suits both them and Russia.
45
Awkward_Swordfish5813 days ago
+10
Sure would be nice if the rest of the EU decided to oust Hungary at this point
10
Current-Code3 days ago
+8
I'd rather see Orban defeated
8
TtotheC813 days ago
+7
They need to introduce a mechanism to isolate obvious bad actors, that's for sure. Russia managed to use the US' own openness and corruption against itself, and with the USA slowly starting to side with Russia, we can't afford to let them do the same to the EU.
7
Brief_Hospital_17662 days ago
+1
They are not 'slowly' siding with Russia, they've been at it full tilt for quite some time.
1
PresidentHurg3 days ago
+24
This. The US has ACTIVE POLICY to support a breakup of the EU. This is in their policy and their leaders share it any time they can. The US is a hostile power. Frankly, I fear their meddling far more then China. The EU needs to act against it.
24
Soylentgruen3 days ago
+5
Which is Trump’s vision, pushed by Russia.
5
RontoWraps3 days ago
+2
Why hello there two word followed by number account name with post and comments hidden pushing anti-Western unity! Nothing suspicious about that.
2
Brief_Hospital_17662 days ago
+1
WTF are you on about? Sorry, but I CBA to change my name within 24 hours of creation and didn't even know it was a Listnook rule until much afterward.
"anti-Western unity" 🤣 There is absolutely nothing Western about America, Hungary, Russia, or any of the other autocratic shitholes you seem to worship.
1
KnightOnAPony3 days ago
I very much agree with you and the point of view.
I complete understand.
USA is toxic as hell. But as European, we should learn to "Keep your friends close, but your enemies closer".
I hope we can play with all parties that can potentially benefit us.
Let us watch our rivals fail and let them burn without too much involvement
0
Artistic_Concern_333 days ago
+27
If Spain is willing to station troops in Eastern Europe with a commitment to fight when Russia starts probing I am willing to listen to them
27
PlatypusBillDuck3 days ago
+43
"Within the framework of NATO's current deployment, Spain participates in the stand-by fleets and has a strong presence on the eastern flank:
The Spanish Army is part of the Advanced Presence (land) mission in Slovakia with its largest contingent, ranking first out of six countries.
Spain has its second largest military deployment in Romania (DEPLOYMENT-F-E).
Spain participates in the battle Group in Latvia in the Advanced Presence (land) mission.
The Spanish army is also deployed in Estonia and Latvia.
In Turkey, Spain is participating in the defence of the territory with the deployment of a Patriot anti-aircraft battery.
Outside Europe, troops are deployed in Iraq (Spain participates in training and capacity-building activities for the Iraqi Armed Forces) and in the Mediterranean and Atlantic (Spain participates in the maritime security operation “Sea Guardian”)"
Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores, Unión Europea y Cooperación[Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores, Unión Europea y Cooperación](https://www.exteriores.gob.es/en/PoliticaExterior/Paginas/EspanaOTAN.aspx#:~:text=Within%20the%20framework%20of%20NATO's,Southern%20Neighbourhood)
43
Four_beastlings3 days ago
+9
Spain has troops stationed in Eastern Europe including fighter jets patrolling the Baltics. It's also the only NATO country who didn't p**** out for fear of pissing off Russia when Turkey asked for help protecting their airspace and for the last 10+ years they've kept troops and a PATRIOT system there. If you don't know shit about shit it's better if you keep quiet.
9
PresidentHurg3 days ago
+11
Yes? Spain is in NATO and honers it obligations? Can you say the same about the US with them threatening to attack Greenland?
11
TWFH3 days ago
+2
You know damn well Spain doesn't do shit militarily and they're just posturing the same as Trump is.
2
KnightOnAPony3 days ago
-8
I refuse to divorce US yet.
But Trump's US we can separate. Let's see how the other side is compensating for this maniac.
-8
Brief_Hospital_17663 days ago
+3
The problem is they will either flit back and forth between two extremes, or will simply cancel all elections in future and just run it back with Fuhrer Vance.
3
KnightOnAPony3 days ago
-1
I agree with you in principle, and I see your point.
But we as EU should not divorce US. We should separate and keep distance from USA and its... society in 2026.
-1
Tabbyredcat3 days ago
+5
I think we shouldn't take impulsive decisions out of rage, but as a European I'm f****** tired of being constantly extorted. By Russia, by the US.
Let's not do anything drastic, but let's move to obtain military and energetic independence.
5
KnightOnAPony3 days ago
-2
We should f*** back..
-2
[deleted]3 days ago
+1
[deleted]
1
KnightOnAPony3 days ago
-1
As said in other post.
Breath. Keep your friends close, but enimies closer.
We, as united Europe should really do something about it. We learn of our mistakes. We are actually better and more solid. We have to stick together.
Those outside our sphere should be kicked out, without doubt (Hey, Hungary).
-1
HungryAddition13 days ago
+37
At what point do most Americans wake up and think to themselves: "Oh no! We've become the bad guys in the story".
37
notjohnstockton3 days ago
+30
We’ve been the bad guys for a long while now. Unfortunately lots of dummies like to wrap themselves in religious and “patriotic” iconography and pretend like we have moral authority over the entire world.
30
henny_on_da_rocks3 days ago
+13
I think most Americans on listnook probably lean that direction. At least based on the subs I'm in, listnook is pretty left-leaning and are pretty unanimously appalled by what is happening. That said, we're not the majority or even a plurality, at least according to the numbers. The biggest group is the people who just don't give a f***.
The biggest problem, as has been pointed out on listnook a billion times, the largest subset of the population is the group that just doesn't care because it doesn't affect them or they aren't paying attention or some other reason. They end up not voting.
The breakdown is about this: \~65% of eligible people (\~154 million) voted on average in the last two elections. So 35% (82 million people) were eligible and either did not register to vote or did not vote . Of the 65% who did vote, about 49.3% of people voted for trump in 2024 (\~75.9 million people) and 48.9% of people voted for Harris (\~75.3 million people).
To summarize:
* 35% of people aren't participating.
* 32.1% of people voted for this
* 31.9% of people voted against this
With such a large group of people not participating, it's basically a coin-flip every election. The 18-24 group and the 25-44 groups voted at rates of 47.7% and 60.2% respectively, which is much lower than the 70-75% from people 45+. If young people aren't going to vote, shit won't change any time soon.
13
twoworldman3 days ago
+7
>the largest subset of the population is the group that just doesn't care because it doesn't affect them
Well, that's going to hit home very, very soon. Apathy is not going to stand in the way of reality.
7
henny_on_da_rocks3 days ago
+9
Honestly, I don't think it will. I'm not sure what would at this point.
(This is just my opinion): I think the USA being so geographically isolated has created this phenomenon where many people here don't really think of global events as "real" - it's like it's a source of content or some perverse entertainment, think rubbernecking at an accident on the freeway.
There are millions of Americans who never leave America, or even their own state (which could be the same size or bigger than many countries elsewhere). Europe or Asia might as well just be a fictional world to them, like middle earth. Hell even other states, like California or New York are portrayed as these communist hellscapes running rampant with homeless people and the bathrooms are full of trans people or some crazy shit.
These people, which I think make up a greater % of the population that we're acknowledging, generally only notice or have any reason to act if it directly impacts them in some way that they notice in their day to day lives (e.g. gas/grocery prices, someone they know gets deported, their kids school gets shot up).
Lets say Trump nukes Iran (the most extreme scenario) based on his latest tweets. What changes for the average American? What's the catalyst for them changing their behavior? Any sort of retaliation on American soil is pretty unlikely, prices might stay high for a bit and they b**** about it, but as soon as the next thing hits the news it's forgotten.
Idk, maybe I'm just in a mood today, but it's pretty disheartening being an American these days.
9
twoworldman3 days ago
+1
What I meant was that they'll see prices are going up no matter their political ideology. There's no denying it when they pay at the register.
1
bjchbdelebweflw3 days ago
+1
People will still deny things, even when it actively affects them, because they are stupid.
1
twoworldman3 days ago
+1
That may very well be true for most MAGA cultists, but less so for people who are sitting on the fence.
1
Kabouki3 days ago
+1
You would think that, but the housing crises is a easy local election fix and up to 90% still no show those.
1
twoworldman3 days ago
+1
We'll see. Houses aren't an everyday purchase unlike gas or food.
1
broken4303 days ago
+1
Hey, is there a possibility that they are not indifferent, but rather find themselves unable to choose between any of these options—neither wanting to emigrate, nor wanting to deal with the disputes over dozens of gender identities, nor wanting to face war?
1
henny_on_da_rocks2 days ago
+1
Not choosing is a choice.
I definitely don't agree with everything on either side, but comparing "dealing with dozens of gender identities" and "facing war" kind of makes the point pretty well: One choice is shit, the other is explosive diarrhea.
1
HungryAddition13 days ago
+1
All the red flags were there. The first term ended in a bunch of morons assaulting democracy. The 35% who chose not to participate are as guilty as the 32.1% who voted for it.
1
previouslyonimgur3 days ago
+9
About 25% of the voting population has known that for years.
About 30% of the voting population is happy to be the bad guys
20% are willing to nuke the world so long as gas is under 3.50
And the last 25% are so f****** apathetic they won’t vote.
Those last 3 groups deserve to rot in hell.
9
6Burgers3 days ago
+1
1967
1
vreemdevince3 days ago
+1
How have the sane ones not died of embarrassment?
1
JaxStrumley3 days ago
Americans are only interested in Americans.
The only hope is that the economic disaster Trump has caused for the world will hit them too and hit them HARD.
0
virtual_adam3 days ago
-7
Ever hear of president Truman?
If kids are taught he was a hero for nuking Japan, why would they grow up thinking bombing a dozen bridges is wrong?
-7
Bad_Day_Moose3 days ago
-1
didn't you hear? Being bad is cool now...
-1
ehowardhunt3 days ago
-2
Just below 50% of us already have.
-2
bijelo1233 days ago
+21
Good. European countries see what that orange bully pedo does, and they don’t want to be any part of it anymore.
21
RepulseRevolt3 days ago
+10
Take us Canadians with you
10
jakreth3 days ago
+2
You are part of NATO
2
Mcayenne3 days ago
+3
I believe they mean in the new security option Europe in planning without the US.
3
DangerBay20153 days ago
+2
Meanwhile, us Canadians are stuck buying doomsday supplies, brake fluid, and pool cleaner, I guess.
2
Boys4Ever3 days ago
+3
Because the first time this administration took side with Putin and told the world to leave us alone wasn't the writing on the wall and ironically now we need their help after we meddled in other's business. Can't make this c*** up.
3
glumjonsnow3 days ago
+6
is spain regarded
[https://www.visualcapitalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/U.S-Military-Vs.ROW\_Maingraphic.jpg](https://www.visualcapitalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/U.S-Military-Vs.ROW_Maingraphic.jpg)
how are they planning to find an alternative to this? especially since spain won't even commit to the minimum for NATO?
i guess if the alternative means a much, much, much weaker defence with everyone totally dependent on france's nuclear umbrella
6
Signal-Volume57133 days ago
+3
Yes, Spain is well regarded among European countries
3
plaerzen3 days ago
-2
Yes, many people hold high regard for Spain. Did you forget to finish that sentence?
-2
Most-Round-41323 days ago
+5
Spain talks like they are arnt dead weight in nato and have been for decades
5
[deleted]3 days ago
+3
[removed]
3
mschuster913 days ago
+9
> Look at the propaganda onslaught online and in Israeli media, depicting Turkey as Iran 2.0.
Erdogan has been drifting into an Islamist dictatorship for well over a decade now, there's a reason the EU accession talks flamed out.
9
Chafram3 days ago
+31
You can write genocide and Gaza. We won’t tell your mom.
31
Prestigious_Task71753 days ago
+2
>We won’t tell your mom.
Speak for yourself, i will!
2
Ferreman3 days ago
+1
Idk man, last time I posted a comment about not being ok how the American ambassador was criticizing my governments investigations in Jewish circumcisions done by people who aren't doctors I got banned for 3 days.
1
virtual_adam3 days ago
+1
Have you ever seen Trump be buddy buddy with Hamas or Iran like he does with Erdogan? This makes no sense
1
Artistic_Concern_333 days ago
“They” the US did not bomb Gaza
0
[deleted]3 days ago
+4
[removed]
4
Jealous_Response_4923 days ago
+1
Gaza is on Israel not the US, Iran is on both.
1
Consistent-Study-2873 days ago
Israel is to the states what Hezbollah and Hamas are to Iran.
0
leisurechef3 days ago
+3
Go home Yankee
3
Consistent_Ad31813 days ago
+1
Increasing defence spending can have beneficial effects for society, it's not ideal but it's not all bad. Good for technology and innovation at the very least.
1
binary_spaniard3 days ago
+1
We need to come to terms that millions of Americans are hostile to Europe and democracy.
1
Codex_Dev3 days ago
+1
Europe needs to grow some f****** balls and boost its defense spending. (looking at you, Spain)
1
The_Rat_Attack3 days ago
+1
I know it’s an absolutely insane take, but I have to be optimistic or I’ll kill myself
I hope that the President after Donald is one of the historical greats who can bring the globe back together again and unfuck the issues in the US. Obviously unlikely and a very tall ask, but I’m a simple man. I just want to live a relatively comfortable life like my parents did. I wanna own a house and raise a family, take the occasional vacation.
1
Ultra_Metal3 days ago
-11
Sanchez is an anti-West tankie. His government talks a lot of bullshit to create division within the West on behalf of his puppetmaster Putin. Both the far left and the far right are puppets of Putin. Do not trust those extremist lunatics.
-11
Oghier3 days ago
+10
Even in today's upside-down world, the idea that Israel or the US wants to invade Turkey is crazy. Absolutely crazy.
If you're genuinely worried about that happening, you can stop.
10
Tabbyredcat3 days ago
+11
Right, when back in March he agreed to give Ukraine 1B€, he must have mistaken Zelenskyy for Putin. "They're both short and Eastern, how am I supposed to distinguish them?" he said.
11
Klemosda3 days ago
+11
I’m not even a Sánchez fan, but this is just nonsense.
Calling him a Putin lackey makes no sense when Spain is openly backing Ukraine, including new military and reconstruction support. At some point, saying obviously false stuff just discredits your whole argument
11
socialistrob3 days ago
+1
Agreed. Hell I'm even someone who has openly questioned Spain's commitment to standing up to Russia but just because they're not Denmark doesn't mean they're Hungary either. Spain may not be the strongest partner for NATO but they're not actively against NATO or the EU either.
1
Ultra_Metal3 days ago
-9
No, you're the one spreading nonsense.
-9
Brief_Hospital_17663 days ago
+6
He will appear like a 'tankie' to anyone who's so far right they’ve rewritten the road signs to only point east.
6
Ultra_Metal3 days ago
-7
I'm a liberal.
-7
servermeta_net3 days ago
-4
liberally lunatic
-4
Berliner12203 days ago
-3
I wonder how many times I will read this in the next years until Trump is gone and the EU has not done anything substantially different
-3
socialistrob3 days ago
+5
If you think Europe hasn't done anything different between now and five years ago you're clearly not paying attention. European military spending is a lot higher and they've added significant capabilities with many more that are set to come online in 2026. Rearmament is an ongoing process and it needs to continue but it's very clearly already happening.
5
fitzgoldy3 days ago
-14
That's f****** funny from Spain. Spain are a complete joke security wise for Europe.
They barely have a military or military spending to help Europe, they've barely lifted a finger in helping Europe vs Russia.
Don't let Trump = bad, mean Spain is good. It's more complicated than that.
-14
Brief_Hospital_17663 days ago
+5
>*"....they've barely lifted a finger in helping Europe vs Russia."*
Spoken with all the prescience of a MAGAt. Well done you.
5
fitzgoldy3 days ago
-11
It's almost like Europe is rightly heavily funding Ukraine to defend itself against Russian aggression.
Spain doing nothing to help Europe.
-11
Tabbyredcat3 days ago
+2
The US is the one who isn't funding Ukraine.
2
fitzgoldy3 days ago
-5
Didn't say it was, barely was in the last year or so of Biden either.
-5
Tabbyredcat3 days ago
+2
The news of Trump deciding to stop aiding Ukraine reached even the Antarctic, but sure LOL
2
[deleted]3 days ago
[removed]
0
Tabbyredcat3 days ago
+3
Do bots live in a parallel universe in which Trump wasn't the American president that withdrew aid to Ukraine and Spain isn't funding it?
3
fitzgoldy3 days ago
+2
1. Funding was slowing to a stop in Biden's last year or so due to lack of support.
2. Literally no one is saying Trump didn't completely stop aid
3. Spain has barely funded anything, they've done FAR less than the US has. That is completely unarguable
What is it with people like you that thinks criticising one means supporting the other?
2
Tabbyredcat3 days ago
+1
> they've done FAR less than the US has
No shit! LMAO
Support whoever you want, just stop spreading misinformation.
1
[deleted]3 days ago
[deleted]
0
aviemzur3 days ago
-5
Alternatives, as in speaking Russian?
-5
Clavicymbalum3 days ago
+2
That's absurd. It's the current Krasnov administration in the USA that is "speaking Russian". Krasnov has been acting the whole time like a 100% kompromat-controlled Kremlin asset/puppet.
2
GarnetOblivion13 days ago
-9
I agree, it’s time that Europe fends for itself. They’ve proven to be unreliable allies when called upon.
-9
JaxStrumley3 days ago
+5
Obviously not your turn to have the MAGA braincell today.
5
Senseofimpendingtomb3 days ago
+2
The bots have their updated talking points, I see.
2
Clavicymbalum3 days ago
* "allies" as defined by the NATO treaty and as Europe understands it: "If any NATO member gets attacked, we're all here for them to defend them and fight back against the aggressor". Example (the ONLY time the NATO Article 5 call for allies to help was ever invoked): After 9/11, Europe was there to help the USA in Afghanistan.
* "allies" as Trump and Trumptards seem to misunderstand it: "Whenever WE (the US President and his sycophants) shit on the kitchen floor by starting an illegal war of aggression to cover up a domestic issue (e.g. Epstein files) and things turn sour because of that lack of any viable plan or strategy, we expect YOU guys to be our good little vassals and come clean up that shit we made".
0
Korkikrac3 days ago
-4
It's funny coming from a country with a weak army that doesn't make a collective effort towards European independence.
We need to move from words to action, and the sooner the better.
135 Comments