So student wants to be called A at school and B with their parents, and the parents have been trying to sue the school for listening to the students wishes, losing a lawsuit in 2022, appeal in 2025, and now supreme court ruling in 2026.
4211
Zestyclose-Pangolin62 days ago
+4365
It must be crazy to watch your parents struggle and fail to sue your middle school when you’re halfway finished with high school
4365
SomewhereNo83782 days ago
+1554
so much money wasted. That could have been money for the whole family’s future
1554
John_Tacos2 days ago
+1554
They probably didn’t use their own money.
Someone probably funded their lawsuit.
1554
Superfast_Kellyfish2 days ago
+1364
Per the article: “They are being represented at the Supreme Court by the Alliance Defending Freedom conservative Christian legal group.” So, yes. The Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) is notorious for funding these kinds of lawsuits.
1364
bajesus2 days ago
+572
So there's a good chance the kid didn't even actually want to be called by different pronouns or names and this was all just set up to trigger a lawsuit
572
galgsg2 days ago
+834
I live in this town. The parents were egged on by a now former member of the school committee (he has since been voted out) who brought this group and another group to town to stir up shit along with another teacher in the building, who has since been fired. The parents the went and attacked the middle school librarian, who is a member of the LGBTQ community, eventually causing them to leave the position due to the hostility in town.
834
angiosperms-2 days ago
+407
Shit like this is happening all over the country. School boards are being infiltrated by churches. Anyone who runs against them is threatened and harassed.
407
hirudoredo1 day ago
+177
we're finally seeing pushback against this in my corner of the world. after years of people ignoring school board elections (giving the moms of liberty types ample opportunity to get in and wreak havoc) we finally voted out / against them last election. But so much damage has already been done.
177
Fragrant-Dust651 day ago
+91
I WISH green party actually focused on THESE important positions instead of wasting money and time on governor or presidential elections. They could actually build their brand and local/grassroots support by taking over school boards with (sane) Green party members.
91
Honey-and-Venom1 day ago
+58
It's all right when identity politics , they started Culture war around trans people in 2016 because they lost a fight on gay marriage in 2015 and needed a new convenient scapegoat
58
Fragrant-Dust651 day ago
+26
I actually think it started with gamergate (and russian bankrolling of social media bots and trolls).
26
MalibootyCutie1 day ago
+11
They are actually getting voted out. Happening even in Missouri.
11
dontsellmeadog2 days ago
+147
This is enraging
147
Browncoat17011 day ago
+21
Sounds like the right wing playbook
21
Nibblerrama1 day ago
+17
Ain’t no love like Christian Hate.
17
rossjones691 day ago
+6
And vice versa
6
Wolfgirl902 days ago
+120
Their kid probably did, but it wasn't as big of a deal as the parents are making it out to be.
Middle school is an awkward time. Kids are still learning about themselves internally while they are rapidly changing externally. It wouldn't surprise me if their kid just wanted to try something out for a few weeks and see how it would go. Like instead of being called "Ashley", they would be called "Ash" instead. Just to see how it would feel. And if it didn't feel right, they could simply change it back.
That's why I'm against letting parents in on this. Because this isn't some big issue that needs intervention.
120
Little_Noodles2 days ago
+74
That’s something I always think about when the “it’s my kid, I hear this FIRST” folks come out of the woodwork.
Even parents that are close and safe to tell are going to be, at best, second or third or more to hear because it’s just a bigger, more permanent-feeling commitment to tell parents. Kids are often going to test things out with friends and impermanent but trustworthy adults first.
If it is a phase or an understandable step off a parallel path, they can feel it out with some other kids that are also making impermanent experiments at building themselves into people and adults that will soon disappear from their lives, so if you decide it wasn’t actually your thing, there’s really no need for a second big-deal conversation.
Basically every pre-teen is doing some weird goddamn thing in an attempt to figure out what their deal is and what kind of independent, autonomous adult they will eventually become. At some point, you just gotta let them poke around at it and be a person that they can talk to if they figure out that their thing involves your assistance.
74
FreeUsePolyDaddy1 day ago
+28
Adults seem to obliterate their own memories of how they themselves were at the same age. Kids don't tell parents for a host of reasons, many understandable and benign.
If a parent really is concerned about getting information quicker, they have an option: talk to their kids more, and listen more than talking.
While I get why a parent would want to be informed, school policies like this cover the problems where a parent isn't supportive. It's the same flavor of issue as having mandatory reporters. The parents are important but not all parents are actually doing the parenting job, so it doesn't make sense in a courtroom to tear down a policy protecting against the latter by holding out hypotheticals derived from the former.
28
ClaireBlacksunshine1 day ago
+8
It’s literally developmentally necessary for adolescents to start distancing themselves from their parents. They are supposed to try out new identities and experiences with friends before involving parents.
If parents are the kid’s best friend and first confidant, that child is not going to be a well-adjusted adult. Peer groups need to replace parents as they get closer to adulthood.
8
Wrong_Cat48251 day ago
+10
kids go through periods where they question things during the middle school years. some kids are fine with all those questions being raised with their parents but most are not comfortable with that. I certainly wasn’t comfortable with even smaller issues being revealed at that age since my parents always seemed to misunderstand
10
FreeUsePolyDaddy2 days ago
+52
Probably just needed a few parents in the state to be puppets that the court would accept as having legal standing. It may not be about specific kids, just about targetting anything that might in any fashion support trans kids.
52
arghabargle2 days ago
+44
That was a revelation immediately following: "The parents said that "so-called gender transition" is harmful and that theirs is a moral objection, not a religious one."
Yeah, totally not religious. Sure.
44
palmmoot2 days ago
+20
I knew it would be these specific assholes
20
MoonChild022 days ago
+26
They claim to be a Christian organization, but that money could have gone to feeding the poor, housing the homeless, treating the sick, defending the wrongly accused/convicted, etc.
"Amen, I say to you, what you did not do for one of these least ones, you did not do for me." Matthew 25:45.
26
ApprehensiveYak32872 days ago
+34
And I'm sure they don't even understand the irony of the name "The Alliance Defending Freedom." Freedom to discriminate against people, I guess.
34
QizilbashWoman2 days ago
+7
At the time, believe it or not, it was to counter the ADL. Once upon a time, the ADL was useful, so the fash made an ADF to counter them.
Swear to God it is true.
7
Made_Human_Music2 days ago
+40
Right wing groups really need to be prohibited from using words like “freedom” and “liberty” in their names when they have zero interest in either
40
IamHydrogenMike1 day ago
+9
I love how these organizations always have defending freedom in their names while doing the complete opposite. Wouldn’t they be against this if they weee truly about freedom?
9
Painbow_High_And_Bi1 day ago
+12
It's always orgs with "freedom" in the name that most want to restrict what individuals are allowed to do.
12
NotASaintBernard1 day ago
+10
Not surprising. ADF is an evil org that funds and trains people with extremist ideologies. They’ve been caught lying before with their lawsuits, embellishing the story, or creating “what if” narratives to push for legislation that benefits their beliefs.
John Oliver did a segment on ADF. I recommend anyone who has not seen it to watch it.
10
Deep-Ad50282 days ago
+32
Any case that makes it to the supreme justices probably have some activist funders.
32
TheBlackTower222 days ago
+16
Either that or it's a giant corporation or a billionaire.
16
Corronchilejano2 days ago
+75
Yeah that kid won't be part of that family for long.
75
castor--troy2 days ago
+16
If we are talking about stable home environments that supported a safe atmosphere to develop and nurture their children, would this be an issue to begin with?
16
Carlyz371 day ago
+13
Exactly. Parents who are unaware that their child might be trans or struggling to define themselves are just not paying attention to their child. Kids that receive unconditional love from their parents aren't afraid to discuss feelings that are confusing or go against the grain of "normal" with their parents. These are people filing lawsuits because they are bad parents. They just want to control their kids but not nurture or support them.
13
Thimascus1 day ago
+7
Eh, even kids that have the unconditional love of their parents may not want to open up to their parents.
But parents who do have *unconditional love* for their kids wouldn't attack a school for something as harmless as asking to be addressed differently at school. They'd just...talk to their frigging kid.
7
Nebuli22 days ago
+48
That family never cared about their kids' well-being to begin with.
48
Taellosse1 day ago
+9
Let's be real: even if that couple WERE footing the bill for all this (they aren't), people like this would not be using such funds to make their children's lives genuinely better. People who harbor such deeply entrenched prejudice are never horrible in JUST ONE way - it's always fractal.
9
freedfg2 days ago
+23
Those parents don't give a shit about their children
23
Honey-and-Venom1 day ago
+3
Got to maintain the right to hurt their children....
3
igetproteinfartsHELP2 days ago
+206
I'm so sure that they thought they were gonna get a big fat settlement lmao
206
Nks_2o932 days ago
+80
Incredible call out. Absurd came to mind, but I hope that kid has real some real ones in their life to see them through.
80
colbymg2 days ago
+17
Before Roe v Wade, there were many similar lawsuits that could have become that landmark ruling, but because the legal system was so slow, their need to have an abortion went away naturally (either death or birth) and they lost standing to sue (You aren't allowed to sue to allow you to have an abortion if you can't have an abortion).
I surprised this one kept going despite that.
17
gideon5132 days ago
+29
Imagine watching your parents fight for years for the right to have you deadnamed even when they’re not around. Must make for some great thanksgiving dinner conversations if those kids haven’t already cut their parents out.
29
s9oons2 days ago
+83
All because they want to be called by their name. I remember a few other times in history when humans marginalized other groups and called them by names or numbers that they were assigned without a choice 🤔
83
AuroraFinem2 days ago
+82
It’s also insane considering nicknames and preferred names have been a thing since the dawn of time, are you suing the school for calling your kid Ed or Eddy instead of Edward?
Why is this even a legal debate? Let the kid be called whatever they ask to be referred to by, it’s literally just common sense.
82
penguinopph2 days ago
+50
My nephew's name is Edison and while my sister was pregnant with him she was adamant that he would only go by *Edison*. Not *Ed*, not *Eddy*, always *Edison*.
I just kept telling her "you don't really get to decide what his friends call him."
50
AuroraFinem2 days ago
+18
My sister was the same way about my nephew lol, same name. Then people started calling him Eddie and she hated it so now it’s just “Ed”.
18
Captain_Mazhar1 day ago
+3
Start calling your nephew Ed-Boy! Dare you.
3
lonefur1 day ago
+5
Ed, Edd and Edison
5
cinderparty2 days ago
+36
There are members of the gop who aren’t using their first names. Ted Cruz’s first name is Rafael. Mitch McConnell’s first name is Addison. He’s not in the house any more, but Madison Cawthorn’s first name is David.
36
KDR_11k2 days ago
+20
And of course most celebrities don't go by their birth name.
20
AuroraFinem2 days ago
+12
That’s kind of a quirk of the guild association, it requires that no actors/actresses share the same “stage name”. It might have made sense to avoid confusion back in the 50-60s but it stopped making sense a while ago and has never been updated.
I get your point though.
12
Drywesi1 day ago
+9
Then there's some, like Nicholas Cage, who wanted to avoid being seen as profiting from their family's cache (he's a Coppola).
9
QizilbashWoman2 days ago
+7
I go by so many variations of my name here there and everywhere it is like when you give a fake name to orgs. When you get addressed by X and not Y, you know where they know you from.
7
superturtle481 day ago
+4
Don't forget our vice president, James David Vance.
4
WowThisIsAwkward_2 days ago
+5
I knew someone in school who had a name she'd go by there and had a different name she'd be called at home.
5
Captain_Mazhar1 day ago
+3
Absolutely. I knew tons of them. When a sub was calling roll, they would answer to their legal name, but say their preferred name or nickname, the sub would write it down, and life would go on. Nobody batted an eye over it.
3
LostWoodsInTheField1 day ago
+4
when I went to school (k-12) there was no less than 3 boys who used names that were not their names, and we were an extremely small school. Not like Rich instead of Richard, but completely detached from their name. The names were always logged with the school and used. It's insane how much of an issue this is now become because a bunch of people with no self worth are afraid of people using 'nicknames' that they feel don't fit.
4
Tgsheufhencudbxbsiwy1 day ago
+3
A lot of these cases are taken up by lawyers who are looking to set precedent. Some times the original plaintiffs aren’t even involved anymore when it goes to the Supreme Court. Not that’s necessarily what happened in this case but I wouldn’t be surprised if this was backed by a PAC.
3
evenfallframework2 days ago
+6
Hopefully a good percentage of students affected by this in 2022 are adults now who will never talk to those parents again, and the parents live an entire lifetime of regret and loneliness.
6
matunos2 days ago
+3
And every legal action on behalf of your parents reinforcing your decision at the time.
3
like_shae_buttah1 day ago
+2
For the express purpose of bullying you too.
2
WhichEmailWasIt2 days ago
+267
Meanwhile who remembers back when we were in school and were asked "Let me know if you go by a nickname or any other name and I'll use that" on the first day of school? Just call people what they wish to be called.
267
SEA_tide2 days ago
+99
In the South, it's fairly common for schools and even job applications to have nickname fields as it's much more common for people to be named after relatives (think Jr/III/IV or Mary-Other Name) that so many people go by something else. There actually aren't that many people whose legal name is Bubba, Tripp, Big Bob, etc.
99
MugRuithstan2 days ago
+42
Nicknames in the south are your true name after awhile
42
Squire_II1 day ago
+17
Most job applications I've seen lately have a "preferred name" field and in some cases they even make it mandatory.
17
TheForeverUnbanned1 day ago
+14
Hold the phone are you telling me “Big Hoss” was using an *alias* at work?! Like some sort of trans?!
14
YouCanCallMeVanZant1 day ago
+4
New Boss Hogg lore just dropped y’all
4
CombatMuffin1 day ago
+15
I've used a similar example with friends who struggle to accept identity changes.
I tell them "so if I were ever to change my legal name, you wouldn't call me different?"
They say "That's different!" but they can never elaborate why. A change of name doesn't harm them, just like a trans or non-binary person's chosen identity doesn't.
But they fear their world voew is being challenged, so they need to push back.
15
TheBeeSovereign1 day ago
+14
Don't forget the f****** weirdos who meet someone they know as, like, Elizabeth, know her as only that until they somehow find out her legal name is still Brandon, and suddenly refuse to call her Elizabeth anymore because "but your legal name is Brandon! That's your real name!"
Meanwhile that same person finds out Buddy's legal name is Ezekiel Jameson Jr. and don't even blink or even bring it up in conversation cuz "everyone calls him Buddy!"
14
Dry_Row_75232 days ago
+360
I went to school in the 90s and this was so commonplace even then. Guy in my class went by billy at home but asked to he called Bill or William in school to sound more mature. I went by middle name at home and first name in school. Had a female friend whose name I honestly forget (it was something very feminine) and she insisted on being called a different men’s name. Afaik she wasn’t trans or even queer at all, just a personal preference.
None of these examples caused any problem 25 years ago in a conservative area of the south.
360
A1000eisn12 days ago
+85
I grew up with a kid who had his nickname on official school records. No one knew his name was David until high school. The teachers all had his nickname (which isn't a normal name) on day 1 and did roll call by that.
My name can be gender neutral and there's many available shortened versions I've gone by over the years. I've also gone by my last name and very briefly tried going by my super cool middle name but it never caught on.
85
ElowynElif1 day ago
+7
I went to school with a guy named something like William Ratherton III. He managed to get his first name on school records changed to Eggy. His parents, who went by Bunny and something equally crazy for his dad, didn’t care. No one else did, either.
7
ClaireBlacksunshine1 day ago
+3
My family has a tradition of naming the second girl child Sara. But there are 10 generations of Sara’s so obviously we don’t call every Sara by her first name. Most of them go by middle names or vaguely related nicknames (Sally for Sara for example). But this same family are major pearl clutchers over trans/nb people. It’s the same thing! Most people don’t know my sister’s name is Sara, she hasn’t been called that since she was a year old.
3
tallemaja2 days ago
+45
Super, super commonplace yes - I was in school in the 90s as well. Though interestingly, I had an early version of this kind of dustup with my parents. Had a teacher ask me what I wanted to be called, I answered with a more neutral version of my name; went with that for a while until a parent/teacher conference where my teacher used my nickname and my mother corrected her, told her not to use the nickname, and scolded me when she got home and told me I should be ashamed of myself for butchering my beautiful name.
Kept me in my place for a very long time but, oops, I still ended up nonbinary. :p I just waited until I was 35 to come out.
45
Orzorn2 days ago
+145
In a stroke of irony, some of these anti-trans laws/rules are hitting CIS students too because when they ask the teachers to call them another name (like William asking to be called Billy) the teacher has to report it. Shit, I remember some students hating their names and just using a totally different one altogether.
145
lolofaf2 days ago
+72
I knew someone with a very Indian (India, not native American) name who decided at some point to change to an English translation of their Indian name. Their parents of course still called them by their Indian name. I bet there's plenty of immigrants and kids of immigrants that are in this fight too
72
penguinopph2 days ago
+27
One of my students is from China and goes by *Wesley*, rather than his Chinese name.
27
AssassinAragorn1 day ago
+8
I recall that being a whole thing that some Asian kids had an English name for school and then a personal name in whichever language
8
FPSlover11 day ago
+5
In my experience, someone having two first names is practically a given among Chinese and Japanese business executives and engineers (especially those born in the 1960s and later). Generally, they adopted them for work related purposes and the name stuck to the point that they're known more by their American name then their other name.
5
eightdx1 day ago
+33
This is a prime "trans rights are human rights" type thing. It's *so* not a big deal when cis kids do it, and they've been doing it for decades using current infrastructure.
Arguably, this hits *more* cis students and is, in part, the point; cis students will be left to blame trans students for the fact that their homeroom teacher basically *has* to call them Nathanael even though the only person who actually calls them that is their grandmother and they don't even like that grandmother and they wish everyone would just call them Buster.
Ever notice how every BS culture war argument terminates in policies that have *massive splash damage for everyone else too*
33
TrizzyG2 days ago
+28
Nicknames are so common too
28
masklinn1 day ago
+5
> I remember some students hating their names and just using a totally different one altogether.
That’s one of my uncles. He does not like his first name, goes by either the middle or the combination of the two, and asked that his godson be given his middle name.
5
idiot2062 days ago
+10
I have a very common first name and would frequently get my homework mixed up with other students, so I “changed” my name at school. Some of my old friends still call me by this name. I cannot imagine suing the school over something so dumb.
10
volkswagenorange2 days ago
+52
I called myself Alice Shapiro for 3 years in HS in the 90s. My name is not Alice. Shapiro was the surname on the fatigues my dad fished out of a jobsite Dumpster for me. Literally not a single teacher had a problem with it. They just made a note in their gradebooks the 1st day of semester and I was Alice from then on.
**Gender affirmation and basic civility are nonissues until trans people want them too.**
52
Dreadsin1 day ago
+6
I went by my last name at school because there were like 6 different Alex’s. It was just easier to have a unique name
(There was someone with my exact same name though, first and last, so that didn’t work either)
6
lu5ty2 days ago
+5
Fr i always insisted everyone use the diminutive form of my name. The only people who use my actual name are my parents and its jarring when anyone else calls me by it
5
PuffyPanda2002 days ago
+26
We should really have some kind of tracker for 'x dollars wasted is stupid lawsuits'.
I bet these guys are well into the millions.
26
Sideview_play2 days ago
+42
All because people view their children as their property.
42
CryAffectionate73341 day ago
+15
The ramifications of this logic is soooo bad too, just think about it for a second.
A kid tells his teacher, in confidence, "hey I use this other name with my peers. But don't tell my parents because .... " Well f****** think about it y'all, because their parents are literally not safe people for them to talk to about this. Or maybe because they're not 100% sure and don't want to have their parents know yet?
These laws LITERALLY require schools to tell parents something their kid told them in private, that could potentially get them hurt, and for what?
Also, the laws technically require you to inform parents of every nickname. As in Tom vs thomas. As in "actually I got by Jr" or by their middle name or anything else.
And literally ALL because the right can't stop being obsessed with hating gay and trans people
I substituted a few years ago, in a very progressive college town, over the year with lots of classes k-12, prob 1000 students at least by the end, there were literally two kids this applied to. One was a little trans girl wearing a dress, I read the list of names, someone corrected me and said "oh that's Gracie actually she's a girl" or something like that, looked up and saw a kid in a skirt, wrote the other name and moved on. Literally NONE of the kids cared, everything about the day was normal. And another time a young girl I think was kinda non-binary, dressed very plain and wanted to go by "pat" or "Sam" or another gender neutral name.
Like, two kids in a thousand or so want a different name at school.
And i did the terrible awful horrible thing of crossing out their legal name and writing what they asked me to and calling them that. Along with all the Alexander's that are Alex, the Thomas that's Tom, etc, because there's way more of those changes needed on the attendance sheet.
But yes, the left is clearly indoctrinating kids by giving them the basic respect of using the name and pronoun they tell us. My God.
"But maybe they'll grow out of it!" Cool ok maybe i don't really give a shit either way, let them figure it out.
15
percypersimmon1 day ago
+19
>that could potentially get them hurt, and for what?
That’s the thing. It’s so they can hurt them.
A lot of these “parents rights” people leave out the fact that they believe it’s their right to treat their children like property.
As with many things, the cruelty is the point.
19
Pockydo2 days ago
+7
Wait what? Maybe I'm just tired
So student wants to be called A at.school and B at home and the parents are upset the school called them A?
Am I understanding that right
7
LyokoMan951 day ago
+2
Actually the supreme court declined to hear this case. That means there is no ruling on this from the Supreme Court. I’m no legal scholar, but if I had to guess they refused to take this case because in might have affected laws in other states.
2
CO420Tech1 day ago
+2
I mean at that point they might as well sue the other students for using nicknames too.
2
GeekFurious2 days ago
+778
The parents attempted to trick the legal system into believing that simply calling someone by a different pronoun was "medical" gender care. And even the conservative SCOTUS was like... bruh.
778
Gamebird82 days ago
+152
And I would have to bet that had this been about the school violating the parents religious rights and not about "medical" gender care they probably would have won in the Supreme Court
152
CitizenCue1 day ago
+16
What an enormous waste of the court system’s time and money.
16
nilmemory1 day ago
+92
Reminder that these same people want to ban all medical care for trans people, both kids and adults, and consider anything not strictly cisnormative to be medical care. Names, pronouns, clothing, etc. Simply existing as a trans person is 'pornographic' and deserves imprisonment. They literally wrote the Project 2025 manifesto that virtually all republican politicians are currently following.
It's always been about genocide but they know that word has bad PR so they take the classicaly conservative "we don't condone [human rights violation], we just support states rights!" Conservative politics have destroyed this country but the voterbase is so blinded by dogma, selfishness, and/or ego they'll never recognize the harm they're doing.
92
Saneless2 days ago
+1133
These are just so stupid
Our daughter goes by a different name at school than what we call her. It's a variation of her name that is fairly common for it. Some men actually go by it too, but that's not why she chooses it
It's just a different name. She doesn't even want us to call her that, it's more of a social and friends thing to her while what we call her is what we have since she was like 2
But....who gives a shit! Is my kid in trouble or having issues? Then I don't need to know shit
1133
SuppressiveFire2 days ago
+476
Because some people value their ideology more than their own kids.
476
Lescaster19982 days ago
+234
I also firmly believe that a large number of people do not view their children as independent people but as extensions of themselves that they own, and therefore think that they should be able to control any and every aspect of their children at all times, and that the world should support their abuse because "that's *MY* child!"
234
wip30ut1 day ago
+39
.... also a lot stems from Christian beliefs in parenting, where they feel responsible to mold their children into followers of Jesus. Their own child rejecting fundamentalist tenets is like a slap in the face to them. They feel that they've failed in their indoctrination.
39
thex25986e2 days ago
+61
lots of people have kids BECAUSE they want their ideas, beliefs, values, etc. to pass onto the future. its called legacy.
61
shadedmagus2 days ago
+46
How parents and family act are a huge factor in whether a child will even _want_ to pass down ideas, beliefs, values, etc.
For instance, I have repudiated my Southern roots because of how awful most of my family is about race and religion.
46
happy_pad1 day ago
+8
Which doesn't make it right. They are autonomous human beings, not property that should be able to indoctrinate.
8
shadedmagus2 days ago
+11
It all comes back to these people and what/who they consider to be property, doesn't it?
11
nocturnal_carnivore2 days ago
+9
well put.
9
Sanskrit862 days ago
+46
My kid started high school telling almost every teacher a different preferred name. We only found out when she said 'good luck at conferences' and we had to make a spreadsheet lol
46
[deleted]2 days ago
+17
[deleted]
17
Sanskrit861 day ago
+7
"Yeah my name is... John. Yes, John."
7
AssassinAragorn1 day ago
+9
Your kid is going to go far, that's amazing
9
[deleted]2 days ago
+11
[deleted]
11
Distinct-Pack-15672 days ago
+16
My niece goes by like 3 or 4 different variations of her name. I dont even think she chose the names. My sister, her aunt, just called her Millie on her own. Liv for another. Then her full name. And probably a 4th idk about.
16
selphiefairy1 day ago
+9
This also makes me think of in language classes, sometimes the teachers would make us pick a french name or a spanish name to go by. The names didn't have to be related to your real name, so it could be any name that originates in that language. Like I went by Elodie in 7th grade french class... my real name sounds nothing like Elodie lmao and my parents never knew. who cares.
9
Saneless1 day ago
+4
Now that I think about it.. my daughter picked Pierre or something for fun
4
HimbimSupreme1 day ago
+2
If people don't have issues with someone named William going by Will or Susan going by Sue, they should have no issues with other names. Transgender or otherwise.
2
igetproteinfartsHELP2 days ago
+1197
Finally some good stuffs coming from SCOTUS.
The parents are trying to sue a public school district in Massachusetts over actions by teachers and officials to support the gender identity of students by not disclosing name or pronoun changes to parents without the child's consent.
SCOTUS will not be hearing their appeal and the lower court's ruling stands. \*\*The 1st Circuit said it was "unconvinced that merely alleging Ludlow's use of gender-affirming pronouns or a gender-affirming name suffices to state a claim that the school provided medical treatment to the student."\*\*
1197
CondescendingShitbag2 days ago
+492
>alleging Ludlow's use of gender-affirming pronouns or a gender-affirming name suffices to state a **claim that the school provided medical treatment to the student.**
Following this logic, using *anyone's* "gender-affirming" names & pronouns by teachers or administration should constitute a HIPAA violation.
492
sighthoundman2 days ago
+90
"would", not "should". SCOTUS agreed with the appellate court's ruling that this argument is unconvincing.
90
KevIntensity1 day ago
+55
Not granting cert doesn’t mean SCOTUS agrees. It just means they aren’t persuaded the controversy needs to be addressed by them at this time and the lower court decision stands. It’s a small distinction, but lawyers can’t cite to the SCOTUS denial of certiorari as authoritative when arguing this matter in other cases.
55
sighthoundman1 day ago
+24
You're right. I defaulted to ELI5 mode.
SCOTUS typically gives no reason for their decision to not hear a case.
24
ChrisPNoggins1 day ago
+3
No using it would be fine but violating the don't disclose it to anyone not permitted ie don't tell my parents would count as hipaa. Like telling the hospital to not tell a mother or father because of relationship cut off after adulthood, and like New Jersey's under 18yo law of doctors not telling parents the child is on birth control combined but for pro nouns and names
3
Sanskrit862 days ago
+93
Its always "should teachers be allowed to conceal a student's identity" and never "why is the student concerned about their parents knowing?"
93
NewsCards2 days ago
+522
> The Massachusetts parents, Stephen Foote and Marissa Silvestri, said in court papers that teachers and officials at Baird Middle School in Ludlow pushed "gender ideology" on children without the knowledge of parents. As a result, the plaintiffs said, their 11-year-old child, known as "B.F.," began to question the student's gender identity.
> After asking teachers and staff to use a new name and pronoun, the student also asked school officials to continue to use the child's original name and female pronouns when communicating with the parents, according to court filings.
Good parents would've taken this opportunity to become introspective and figure out why their child felt like they could trust their teachers more than themselves.
Stephen Foote and Marissa Silvestri are not good parents.
522
whatproblems2 days ago
+85
ideology over all
85
Orzorn2 days ago
+84
"Why won't me kids talk to me anymore?! It must be that new liberal WOKE college she's going to!"
84
Lt_Rooney2 days ago
+42
If they were the sort of people who could ask themselves such questions, they wouldn't need to.
42
Ntroepy2 days ago
+43
>Good parents would’ve taken this opportunity to become introspective and figure out why their child felt like they could trust their teachers more than themselves.
You largely answered that yourself.
Parents that are so enraged over this are almost certainly evangelicals. And, of course, most LGBT (but especially T) kids trust virtually ANYONE more with their own evangelical parents to come out to.
If a child feels this way, you can assume their parents are NOT “good parents” and likely not the introspective type.
43
Alaykitty2 days ago
+6
I hope someone lights a bag of dog shit on their doorstep and rings the bell lol. What useless existences they lead.
6
clowncarl2 days ago
+23
Didn’t you know, this is the healthiest way to approach the situation. I mean, the school brainwashed the kid clearly. The parents told their kid to not be themself (totally normal) but they insist that being themselves at school and being open about it like it is ok (talk about indoctrination!)
23
Deranged_Kitsune2 days ago
+11
The parents think they know their child better than the child.
11
TheWalkinFrood1 day ago
+7
Some people are simply neurologically incapable of self reflection. They're known as conservatives.
7
barbieq682 days ago
+204
How to ensure your child goes no contact 101
204
silam392 days ago
+84
and they'll still be narcissistic enough to blame anything and anyone except themselves when it happens
84
mosspigletsinspace2 days ago
+45
20 years from now they'll be trying to sue for grandparents rights or something. Nutters
45
wip30ut1 day ago
+6
they're probably Mormon or Christian fundamentalists so they'll probably cutoff contact with their child on their own if they don't turn to God and rehabilitate themselves to Jesus's strict vision of them.
6
unafraidrabbit1 day ago
+2
I told a guy he probably hasn't tied his bathrobe since his kids stopped visiting and he got real mad.
2
AniseClover2 days ago
+30
We are such a weak race. Literally who cares?? Let Kid A be called “Kid A” at school and “Kid B” at home!!
Why is this a huge debate?! Why do people have to care about such little things that literally dont affect them in any form??
30
Own-Paramedic39631 day ago
+9
> Why is this a huge debate?!
"Are traps gay?" - 4chan circa, 2010's
Trap, meaning a person who is feminine, and was born male. Eventually they turn to trans women, they incorporate them into the discussion. Is liking a trans woman gay? Ideological lines are drawn and people are willing to back their thought with action. Putting a fascist into office.
9
AniseClover1 day ago
+3
God, I fuxking remember that stupid question. Smh. What a time to be alive…
3
kandoras2 days ago
+85
The case was first thrown out of federal court in 2022. That dismissal was upheld on appeal in 2025. And again today in 2026.
Maybe the kid wouldn't have needed to ask the school to protect them from their parents if those parents had spent even a fraction of the four years they've been in and out of courtrooms treating that kid as an individual person and not merely an extension of their own beliefs.
Maybe they could even try talking to them and taking an interest in their lives.
85
spazzcat2 days ago
+21
If I were this kid, I would be asking the courts for emancipation from their parents.
21
fordag1 day ago
+24
>The U.S. Supreme Court declined on Monday to hear a bid by parents to sue a public school district in Massachusetts over actions by teachers and officials to support the gender identity of students by not disclosing name or pronoun changes to parents without the child's consent.
The title is so poorly worded.
24
BluestreakBTHR1 day ago
+3
That’s why people need to RTFA before they smash out some shitpost while on the toilet.
3
PiercedAndTattoedBoy1 day ago
+19
I taught for 10 years and have subbed for 4. I have NEVER felt the need to tell anyone that a kid wants me to call them by another name so long they don’t say “call me Poopy Buttface” or some stupid thing like that. I’m going to go on calling kids by their preferred names.
19
BluestreakBTHR1 day ago
+7
“Poopy Buttface” ? Of the Connecticut Buttfaces?
7
Chubby_Bub1 day ago
+4
Please, Mr. Buttface is my father.
4
chargoggagog1 day ago
+18
I have a student who goes by her middle name at school. I just go with it because why wouldn’t I call a kid by a normal name they want? As long as it’s not something like “vagpounder69420” then I’ll call them whatever they want.
18
HappyInsurance60131 day ago
+12
She’s too young for that! She can only go by her middle name when she’s in her mid twenties and trying to reinvent herself 😜
12
Liminal_Aspect2 days ago
+15
I don't understand why a name preference would imply anything about gender - isn't this the same generation that were Cash fans... "A Boy Named Sue"... at no point was the boy's gender in question. They ate that shit up.
15
zacharywasd1 day ago
+13
SCOTUS declining to hear it doesn't mean they endorsed the policy but it does leave the lower court ruling in place for now
13
ShadowKiller1477411 day ago
+28
Can’t wait for all these schools to crack down on the epidemic of nicknames. Going by D*** with friends and Richard at home, Elizabeth at home and Beth with friends, when will it end!?!?
28
DireBare1 day ago
+6
As a teacher . . . this is already happening. Not driven by schools themselves, but by newly passed anti-queer state laws. To follow both state law and school policy, I can't use nicknames at all without written permission from the parents.
6
lyreluna1 day ago
+27
In a few years these " parents" are going to be crying why doesn't my child call or visit anymore
27
7GatesOfHello1 day ago
+10
I wonder how often my mother wonders about me. I wonder about her, and I occasionally discuss the the consequences of my decision with my friends. I frequently dread the day I will learn about her death. But that's the price I pay to prevent her from learning about mine.
10
mountaindoom1 day ago
+32
If my students want to be called "Spaghetti," idgaf. Just wear deodorant and do your work.
32
caffa41 day ago
+5
There was a kid in my 4th grade class that went by Taco. Everyone (teachers included) just called him Taco. I don’t even recall anyone even questioning it.
5
BluestreakBTHR1 day ago
+3
I mean “Nacho” is the diminutive nickname for “Ignacio” - so Taco is acceptable. [insert related political reference joke here]
3
TheUnderCrab2 days ago
+44
When I told my parents I wanted to go by a new name, they shrugged and said “okay sure. Let us know if you change again.” I changed back within a week.
These are just shit parents that want to abuse their kid
44
geb_bce2 days ago
+21
Exactly the same thing we did with our daughter. One month she was trans and wanted to go by a different name and gender. Next month she was just pan and wanted a different name. In the end, she's back to using her birth name and female pronouns.
I went through the same thing as a teen but it was dying my hair and getting pierced. By the time I graduated highschool I'd removed all my piercings and just had natural hair color. I never even got a tattoo. My parents let me get all that out of my system early and I personally think it helped me be more professional in adulthood.
21
McKenzie_S2 days ago
+26
Problem is there are people out there who aren't like your parents. Transgender folk make up a very tiny amount of people, it's less than 1%. Letting kids explore identity is healthy, but the fear mongering has made it dangerous for a large chunk of kids to openly express themselves.
26
nocturnal_carnivore2 days ago
+52
so they allowed the school to keep the child’s gender identity and preferred name private from their parents. that’s honestly a huge win for minor rights.
there are awful parents out there doing awful things to their lgbtq+ children, so keeping this information private can save children from a lot of home abuse. i’m glad to hear the court declined to hear an argument.
52
No_Issue23341 day ago
+8
It's not as big as it sounds. Rejecting to hear a case does not set precedent.
8
baltinerdist2 days ago
+20
Imagine your parents hating who you are so much that they're willing to go to the Supreme Court of the United States in order to feel justified in doing so.
Imagine your parents, the people who are supposed to love you and support you unconditionally, choosing their own bigotry over you THIS EFFING HARD.
20
EmperorPalpitoad1 day ago
+8
Only 1% of all appealed cases are heard by the supreme Court
8
Vegetable_Good68662 days ago
+24
At this point my heart skips a beat when ever I hear Supreme Court and Gender Identity, I expect the worst, glad it was positive for a change.
24
SirRichardLove2 days ago
+38
F*** those parents who sued over this. Seriously, go f*** yourselves. Stop making it harder for kids to be themselves.
38
Shradow1 day ago
+23
Perfect example of why kids keep stuff like this from their parents. If they were better parents the kid would've been comfortable telling them the same way they tell the school.
23
Reyna_girlie2 days ago
+81
Am I going crazy or is this an actual good Supreme Court ruling?? Holy shit didnt think it could be done
81
trickman012 days ago
+90
You are mistaken. This is not a ruling. They are declining to hear the case.
90
TheCrowScare2 days ago
+51
Yes but by not taking up this case, the appellate court ruin stands in favor of the school district. That is a good thing. Even if the ruling didn't come from the supreme Court which would have been nice as it would have national implications, at the very least at least that district has some relief
51
Drywesi1 day ago
+7
I'm sure the 5th Circuit will hold that allowing children to have their own legal rights before age 30 is a violation of religious freedom soon enough to balance this out.
7
razgriz50001 day ago
+5
More likely has to do with the fact that Sonia Sotomayor is assigned to the first circuit which Mass is a part of.
5
No_Issue23341 day ago
+7
Declining to hear a case does not set precedent. This is not a ruling
The 1st Circuit Court for Appeals sets precedent in the 1st Circuit only, which is Maine, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Puerto Rico. The 1st Circuit is already progressive as these states are pretty progressive, and the 1st Circuit is under Justice Kentanji Brown Jackson
It's a pretty limited win that only applies to 4 states and 1 territory
7
TrickiestToast2 days ago
+31
Gotta have a handful of these rulings so they can act like it’s balanced when they issue 10 rulings that are insane
31
pontiacfirebird922 days ago
+26
They want to appear fair before they totally gut the Voting Rights Act and hand future elections to Republicans on a silver platter.
26
JiminyDickish2 days ago
+11
This ruling has no corporate interest lining their pockets
11
TheMan59912 days ago
+20
Yeah, they seem to be riding this weird line of “gender affirming medical care is a no-no, and we won’t respect trans people in sports, but Idgaf if someone wants a different name”
20
b1argg2 days ago
+48
I would assume it's because it's a much more cut and dry 1st amendment argument.
48
elbenji2 days ago
+29
It's also because it just basically illegalizes nicknames which is stupid
29
justagenericname2132 days ago
+22
Jd Vance was named at birth "James Donald Bowman". Its probably really hard to set up a law around names that isnt gonna force him(and other men) to change back to names they dont want/like.
22
Piscesdan2 days ago
+15
Or Senator Raphael Edward Cruz who wants to be called Ted
15
SeleneVomerSV1 day ago
+5
Ironically, I thought the thumbnail was of a sewer grate.
5
MadMechem1 day ago
+19
For Pete's sake.
I go by a nickname in my *f****** professional life*; I just found out last week that one of my cousins is named "Richard"- and I assure you that's not what I've been calling him the last 25 years; My sister uses her full first name on documents but a much different nickname for everything else; I have a friend who goes by a pseudonym in our friend group and her actual name elsewhere. shockingly, not a one of us has become the boogeyman that these idiots seem to fear.
Nothing about "preferred names" was a problem until the morons that be realized it could vaguely benefit the trans/NB communities. All rules like this will ever do is make *everyone* less safe and more miserable, just to stomp a little harder on a minority group.
19
witchspoon1 day ago
+20
Meanwhile we have “Ted” Cruz , “J.D. Vance” neither of which were born with those names. And others.
But continue to support legislation that SHOULD include them in who it affects.
20
Finn-reddit2 days ago
+21
It's crazy that people think we should not respect a kids wishes when it comes to something so trivial and simple.
Are kids not deserving of respect or something?
Conservatives do not value empathy or respect.
21
jcooli091 day ago
+3
Or children, given the number of kids they've gotten shot at schools.
3
Wooden_Reveal19491 day ago
+9
Damn they could be putting their kid through college with all that money but instead they're wasting it on this bullshit. Great parents
9
statslady232 days ago
+9
Middle school teachers just want you to stay quiet and preferably do your work.
9
Murray382 days ago
+17
The almost primal lack of shame that conservative voters feel is a blight on humanity.
17
cribsaw1 day ago
+4
Citing due process as a reason why the school won’t tell you that your child is genderqueer (because you’re a shit parent and your kid is obviously afraid of you), is a really f****** rich stretch.
God help that poor child.
4
Evening-Row90221 day ago
+9
lol where in the constitution does it say parents are entitled to anything. these cases make me crack up. love your effing kids or don’t have any seriously. stop having children to mold them into your image. they’re kids with a life of their own.
9
BluestreakBTHR1 day ago
+2
But then TLC would run out of programming!
2
Unusualnamer1 day ago
+2
Meanwhile in Florida 😭
A kid can’t even get a bandaid without a form signed by parents here.
197 Comments