The fact the Hindustan Times articles keep getting allowed to be posted here and upvoted should say a lot about the state of misinformation re this war.
Edit: meant this as a reply to the top comment
1471
PilotArtist1 day ago
+191
>the state of misinformation re this war.
We got lego news, US betting on war outcomes in the open... we truly are living in the wildest times
191
CelestialFury1 day ago
+23
> we truly are living in the wildest times
Bad times.
23
Rusty-Shackleford1 day ago
+20
How so? Honest question, what is the bias/slant of Hindustan Times?
20
floyd_droid1 day ago
+32
I would say center, maybe slightly left leaning.
It’s a 100 year old paper and their print edition is pretty good. I’m sure they also have clickbaity articles online.
But, they consistently get journalism awards for their in depth pieces.
32
GorgeousGamer991 day ago
+27
Yeah we should stick to reputable sources like Jerusalem Post, Ynet News and Times of israel
27
GonzoVeritas1 day ago
+3290
Apparently, the Iranians notified the US that they will take action unless the ship reverses course.
> A U.S. Navy destroyer headed towards the Strait of Hormuz was issued an imminent threat by Iran on Saturday amid the fragile two-week ceasefire tentatively agreed to between Washington and Tehran, the Hindustan Times reported.
>
> “Any US military vessel crossing the Hormuz Strait will be attacked within 30 minutes,” reads a warning directed at the U.S. Navy destroyer, according to the Hindustan Times and other foreign media outlets.
>
> Axios reporter Barak Ravid claimed on Saturday that U.S. warships had “crossed” the Strait of Hormuz earlier that morning without issue, citing an unnamed “senior U.S. official,” the “first time U.S. warships have crossed the Strait of Hormuz since the war began.” Later, Ravid claimed – again, citing an unnamed senior U.S. official – that the United States had “not received any threat from Iran to attack the ships.” (via RawStory)
The Hindustan Times then reported that the US ship had reversed course.
>US military ship turns back from Hormuz route after Iran's 30-min warning
(I don't know if these are credible reports or not, I'm not familiar with the veracity of the Hindustan Times)
3290
Shot-Toe-28841 day ago
+3404
Indian news is some of the worst journalism in the world.
3404
NY_SN1 day ago
+1570
One of the countries with the highest misinformation.
https://news.umich.edu/india-ranks-as-highest-risk-for-misinformation-u-m-experts-can-comment/
https://www.statista.com/chart/amp/31605/rank-of-misinformation-disinformation-among-selected-countries/
1570
Shot-Toe-28841 day ago
+702
It’s crazy, you talk with some of them on Listnook and you get the sense they don’t even know which way is up and which way is down. They are being drowned in misinformation
702
mackfeesh1 day ago
+532
Brother Listnook? Try in real life. I had a man from India try to tell me they invented ice hockey. In Canada. Like specifically modern ice hockey.
532
Mostly_Aquitted1 day ago
+191
I had an Indian student at work brag that their milk has a higher fat % than in Canada.. like ok? Cool? Is that a competition?
191
sadrice1 day ago
+78
It sort of is, fat content of whole milk has a strong correlation to nutrition of the cow, and so they are bragging about being better at raising cows/having a climate that can provide quality fodder basically year round.
[Milk from the English Channel Islands](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Channel_Island_milk) is known for quality, and might be similar to what they are taking about.
Still a weird flex tho…
78
Wakanuia1 day ago
+29
They do like their cows...
29
Possible-Nectarine801 day ago
+9
Holy cow, do they ever!
9
Mostly_Aquitted1 day ago
+15
Yeah my whole thing is why is that something worth trying to flex about
15
liquorfish1 day ago
+14
I used to have coffee with 40% heavy cream. The ass blasting was not worth it. They can keep their high fat milk.
14
ImNotABotScoutsHonor1 day ago
+24
Weakling.
24
liquorfish1 day ago
+11
I may be weak but my wind is strong.
11
ichabod011 day ago
+3
Try lactose free
3
Hallow_Chef1 day ago
+7
It’d be hilarious if they still drank 2%/semi-skimmed while bragging about whole
7
honey_102b1 day ago
+158
my Indian coworker who came to my country for better life and work prospects told me that fresh milk available here is actually made from powdered milk (it isn't) because "real fresh milk should only last a few days" yet ours have >1 week expiry dates. another lady told me most of the milk in the world is actually from buffalo, not cows. both of them have engineering degrees.
158
Helpful-Leading-79481 day ago
+72
\> another lady told me most of the milk in the world is actually from buffalo, not cows
It is true for india though. until 2013, >50% milk was from buffaloes.
72
Koala_eiO1 day ago
+31
So their sentence is still wrong. Still interesting though.
31
unknownpoltroon1 day ago
+13
I mean, maybe not. Does india have more buffalo than the rest of the world has cows? I doubt it, but I havent checked.
13
quad_damage_orbb1 day ago
+22
>both of them have engineering degrees.
I have crossed paths with a couple of Indian people in neuroscience who had PhDs and had frankly bizarre ideas. One denied that the caste system exists, another believes in chakra, the other was just completely incompetent and didn't seem to understand anything we were doing in the lab, like she didn't seem to have a basic understanding of biology.
22
ScrotumNipples1 day ago
+14
They're experts at studying to pass the exam without actually learning anything. Many get PhDs just to stay on student visas. They know how to play the game.
14
throwawayDan111 day ago
+8
Yeah I see this all the time. PhD in eng. but cant explain most basic of concepts makes me really question graduate teaching
8
Optimal_Juggernaut371 day ago
+20
> both of them have engineering degrees.
That's not always a great measure of intelligence to be fair. I've met quite a few reality dissonant engineers in my time, mechanically and mathematically intelligent sure, but the lack of common sense and awareness put them high on the spectrum.
20
MexicanEssay1 day ago
+48
I've run into some of them that are convinced that chili peppers are native to India and mock the idea that they were originally from Mexico/Mesoamerica.
48
sadrice1 day ago
+33
That’s a Korean thing too.
33
MexicanEssay1 day ago
+14
Pretty crazy thing to believe, given that the relatively well-preserved records of the ancient kingdoms and empires of India and China/Korea make absolutely no mention of them prior to the 1500s or 1600s, when they were brought over by European traders.
14
sadrice1 day ago
+8
Well [check this out](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235261811730149X). He is outraged at the suggestion that the *Japanese* could possibly have introduced anything to Korea, and furthermore that it could possibly be new world.
I’ve also found “scientific papers”, perhaps by the same author, that claimed that Korean chilis have been in Korea for *billions* of years, ignoring that that is longer than the entire plant kingdom has been around, much less the continent of Asia and the Korean Peninsula…
8
ScrotumNipples1 day ago
+10
My exoerience with Indians in Canada is that they'll brag about how great India is until you ask them why they're in Canada. They usually respond with "India has lot of problems, lot of problems..."
10
Spasik_1 day ago
+24
Lol my colleagues told me the same thing . Must be big news there
24
klutzikaze1 day ago
+3
On a train in India I had a guy telling me that Indian women had a lower incidence of uterine cancer because they didn't use western toilets and their thigh activation somehow helped their uterus....?
I've always wondered if that's true and was that a very weird chat up line.
3
hey_there_moon1 day ago
+3
I mean it's hard to get diagnosed if you aren't screened. Like there's hundreds of millions of women in rural India that likely don't even know what a pap smear is. [Only 2%](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12702179/) of women in India aged 30-49 have ever been screened for cervical cancer.
3
WideFox9831 day ago
+68
Heard the one about magic Indian historical sites where no shadows exist? What a joke.
68
mammalmaker1 day ago
+16
I had an American tell me they invented the poutine, I'm also Canadian.
16
mmarkklar1 day ago
+7
I thought everyone knew ice hockey was developed in Canada, it’s why the ice rink in the small town in Ohio I grew up in had a Canadian flag hanging up lol
7
hey_there_moon1 day ago
+5
Every ice rink I've ever been to, whether in the southeast or out west has had a Canadian flag lol. I was very confused as a child
5
woodpaulusgnome1 day ago
+12
Have you not seen the BBC TV show Goodness Gracious Me? You would be surprised by how many things one of the characters stated were Indian.
12
ShelZuuz1 day ago
+9
The "Jesus was Indian" skit is great.
9
diabetic_debate1 day ago
+3
Man I used to watch that show when I was a kid in India, such a great show.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8tw7LIykvBw
3
Mountain-Singer17641 day ago
+2
Yea that’s comedy coming from real life.
2
VagueSomething1 day ago
+6
Its like if North Korea let their citizens move abroad for work.
6
TheQuietManUpNorth1 day ago
+38
A staggering lack of knowledge on so many subjects. I've had to explain who Hitler was and that vikings were real.
38
Helpful-Leading-79481 day ago
+17
Hitler was well known.
In india, I had multiple chapters in class 8, about WW2, and a chapter dedicated to just hitler and his atrocities back in the 2000s.
I checked, we still do: [https://ncert.nic.in/textbook.php?iess3=3-5](https://ncert.nic.in/textbook.php?iess3=3-5)
"Nazism and the rise of hitler"
17
NoMoneyNoV-Bucks1 day ago
+25
Tbf what do you know of indian history? It’s the same for indians and European history as euopeans and Indian history
25
switchy851 day ago
+53
I mean, hitler isn't JUST European history. He's about as close to a world history icon as you can get.
53
broohaha1 day ago
+23
You'd be surprised to find how much he's not that well known in east and southeast Asia. His name might be familiar to the general populace but the extent to why he's a monster is largely not well understood.
23
JuxtaTerrestrial18 hr ago
+2
I watched on YouTube some Chinese women react to the band of brothers series, and it was wild how much that I thought was wider common knowledge that they just never heard of. Not a criticism of them, especially because I know they'd have a similar reaction to thingsi don't know about their part of the world.
2
biggustdikkus1 day ago
+11
> Tbf what do you know of indian history?
Just enough to piss them off lol
11
Many_Consideration861 day ago
+4
Do you know how many indians fought in WW1 and WW2? And on which sides?
4
HBlight1 day ago
+2
I always think of this when people laugh at Americans not being able to name European countries. I'd be fucked to name the various different rectangles of the US..... shit I'd be fucked if you had me name the eastern European countries.
2
shercoder1 day ago
+25
WhatsApp news has corrupted them. Just imagine if Trump has control over entire news cycle in US. Thats Modi for you right now.
25
Significant_Ad12561 day ago
+8
I mean I get that sense with Americans on Listnook too.
8
DaemonPrimarchJ1 day ago
+14
Absolutely terrifying, we need laws against this everywhere - otherwise we're gonna end up with wars, genocides, tyranny and etc (which I know have all happened before, but it would be good to not have a hellish future)
14
Jove_1 day ago
+34
Future? Are you living in the past?
34
Cbecker71 day ago
+22
Idk if you've looked around but that's literally all happening right now.
22
VarmintSchtick1 day ago
+5
Luckily nation-state intelligence doesnt operate on media claims (at least not functional countries), but, thats not to say that political leaders wont use the media to achieve their own goals.
5
Sworn1 day ago
+14
Saar, India will be superpower by ~~2020~~ ~~2025~~ 2030.
14
SaltonPrepper1 day ago
+2
Wait till AI is even more prevalent. Sigh.
2
PatReady1 day ago
+5
They barely report anything on the news anymore. Good luck getting news in the counties that vote Trump.
5
CuriousCursor1 day ago
+35
You know stuff is bad when US and Pakistan are in the same misinformation bracket and India is worse than both.
35
JB-Wentworth1 day ago
+34
I think the US should be ranked higher on that list.
34
Bigbigcheese1 day ago
+105
Which of the five countries listed as worse than the US, is the US actually worse than, in your opinion...?
105
AuroraHalsey1 day ago
+3
What five countries are listed? I can't decipher that map.
It doesn't even have a colour for 2nd and 3rd place.
Then it says bright orange is for places 4th to 6th, but puts the US, Ireland, France, Finland, Czechia, Romania, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan (8 countries) all in bright orange.
3
D4ltaOne1 day ago
+6
Yeah the map is horrible compared to the original lol
https://www.weforum.org/publications/global-risks-report-2024/
6
BezisThings1 day ago
+2
I don't quite get what the image on statista is show. For example the dark yellow colored countries are ranked 11-15th but there are like 30 of them?
2
AAPL_1 day ago
+158
here comes the mob
158
El-Sueco1 day ago
+102
They’re misinformed only half of them will come.
102
Shot-Toe-28841 day ago
+12
Haha and the ones that do will bicker amongst themselves.
12
Sweet-Competition-151 day ago
+23
Worse than Faux Angertainment?
23
exoriparian1 day ago
+38
Yes it's pretty much the same model but more shameless. Obviously this is painting with a broad brush.
38
IBJON1 day ago
+106
The Hindustan Times will report literally anything without verifying the story or sources.
A while back I kept finding news reports from them regarding things that happened local to where I live in Florida even though literally nobody else was reporting on it, or stories that were still in progress. Every time their reporting was way off.
I'd hazard a guess that they scrape social media and use AI to fill in details. With how immacurate their reporting is, how fast they get an article out, and the fact that we're talking about events that often times don't even make it into the local news, there's no way they have humans writing the articles and they're just cranking out as much content as they possibly can
106
bocephus_huxtable1 day ago
+34
LOL.. I noticed that the Hindustan Times is always one of the very first "news outlets" to report on gang activity... in Los Angeles, lol.
34
Nahuel-Huapi1 day ago
+32
That website, and several others like it is one of the methods Russia has been using to "legitimize" fake news. It's called *information laundering*, and they've been doing it for decades.
[https://www.cima.ned.org/blog/information-laundering-and-globalized-media-part-i-the-problem/](https://www.cima.ned.org/blog/information-laundering-and-globalized-media-part-i-the-problem/)
32
TotalPop51 day ago
+458
Just check the article, they don't even have any source.
https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/us-military-ship-turns-back-from-hormuz-route-after-irans-30-min-warning-101775915292475.html
They probably get that from the Iranian claim, forgot to write "according to the Iranian media".
458
Poe_421 day ago
+208
This is the same media outlet that started the rumor that Trump was rushed to the hospital last weekend without any sources. It's not a credible source.
208
Papa_Raj1 day ago
+32
My heart almost skipped a beat I was so excited. What a let down.
32
BadPunners1 day ago
+17
That did seem to infuriate trump... Which hopefully isn't good for his heart and stroke risk
He does seem to have a standing monthly appointment, not "rushed". As evidenced by the reoccurring bruises
17
BigEOD1 day ago
+10
But but but it says bad stuff that confirms that person bias, pick a side!
10
aspz1 day ago
+2
Why would Iranian media admit to making an empty threat to a US warship?
2
Dark_World_Blues1 day ago
+305
I personally don't trust any Indian news. Many of them have propaganda or would make up stories.
305
AntifaSuperSoldier131 day ago
+78
So Barak ‘18200’ Ravid is not trustworthy. He is a former member of IDG’s Unit 8200 (information warfare/propaganda) and gets his legit scoops through relationships made by publishing stuff like this. By this I mean dubious claims made by unnamed officials in the US gov.
78
Rockooch19681 day ago
+12
This should be at the top! He helps dTrump manipulate the market....d*****.
12
Mac629611 day ago
+36
So more he said she said. Ugh trumps people and the IRGC both lie so damn much it impossible to know Someone have to ask the boat captain
36
Ditnoka1 day ago
+3
Yeah this entire situation is a joke. Anyone claiming they have correct information in this quagmire is either lying or a direct insider.
3
Dumpster_Fire_Dancer1 day ago
+24
Barak Ravid at Axios is a Trump mouth piece and Trump frequently launders his bullshit through Barak.
24
HarEr891 day ago
+18
Indian News...what a joke
18
be_blessed_bruh1 day ago
+8
So did somebody do the needful?
8
Mountain-Singer17641 day ago
+2
Please revert back to me
2
bliss191 day ago
+5
It’s not reliable in the least. I mean it’s the same organization that claimed Dubai launched an airstrike towards Iran during the ceasefire… so take it with a kilo of salt
5
TurbulentPromise48121 day ago
+10
Is this confirmed?
10
Previous_Soil_51441 day ago
+1399
Wouldn't be surprised if they ordered those ships to go through just to be able to claim that ships are going through.
Nobody should care until full tankers(U.S.) go through and insurance companies agree to cover them. Until then, it's all for show and the straight is still closed.
1399
Dillweed9991 day ago
+324
Even just a show of force there is pretty darn risky. There is a reason they never tried to transit during active hostilities. The US public's tolerance to this c*** is clearly very precarious, and the USN hasn't lost a real warship since 1945. A shiny destroyer getting schwacked and a couple hundred sailors dying would really be an enormous political hit and would require either a very sits escalation or an even more humiliating climb down
324
LARPerator1 day ago
+121
That's kind of what they want. They want the ships to take fire so they can blame Iran for the war still continuing. Better yet, they would probably try to DARVO (their specialty) their way out by claiming it's a dastardly sneak attack during negotiations. Something that would upset americans and get them to believe Iran is an irrational actor, and that they tried their best but Iran just wanted war. Which, ironically, is **exactly how the USA began this war**.
They're playing narrative games here, not making strategic moves. They're hoping that enough americans will forget about why and how this war started, and if they can shape the narrative, then they can keep up domestic support. Expect them to be less focused on tight military objectives, and more on at-home political factors.
It's ironic how similarly they're following Russia's 3 day operation. One reason why people keep underestimating how much loss Russia can handle, it's really about how the Russian government is more concerned with how the war looks at home rather than how it's going. This is why they could fight the way they did. Now americans aren't going to tolerate even a fraction of the casualties that russians do. But in terms of easily being brought around to supporting a losing war? That's been building since 9/11. We're just at a point where it might get much more severe.
121
Vegetable_Leg_70341 day ago
+60
Trump and his cabinet also want to drag the EU and NATO into this to fix his mess, and let Russia have a breather in Ukraine (NATO's reason to exist), and trying to get a Putin puppet (Orban) re-elected inside the EU.. Trump has done nothing but help Russia since the 80's
60
Dillweed9991 day ago
+33
People underestimate how bad the oil situation could get. The 1973 oil shock, which was about half as bad as what is unfolding now, resulted in the equivalent of $15/gal gasoline. One of the bigger Ford F150s pickups have 36 gallon tanks, you can do the math. I don't know if MAGA can survive that.
33
venomous_frost1 day ago
+24
that's about a million per litre converted for us Europeans
24
KsigCowboy1 day ago
+4
What is your source for $15/gal gasoline? Gas was .55 a gallon at its height which is about 3.68 today.
4
Dillweed9991 day ago
+4
A 5% cut in production resulted in oil getting about 4x as expensive as it had been in relative terms.
4
Optimal_Juggernaut371 day ago
+6
> They want the ships to take fire so they can blame Iran for the war still continuing.
If they lose a ship transiting the straits after starting the war that didn't need to be started, the people will blame the administration.
MAGA will still f****** cheer and clap with their evil Osmond smiles but the rest of the people will not be happy.
6
LockNo29431 day ago
+31
They're likely trying to intentionally provoke Iran and have them break the cease fire.
31
IronChariots1 day ago
+24
>A shiny destroyer getting schwacked and a couple hundred sailors dying would really be an enormous political hit
Yeah, Trump might lose *dozens* of supporters. His ratings would "crash" to the upper 30s again.
24
uniqueusername6231 day ago
+6
And according to the Listnook headlines he will “meltdown” once again
6
frawgster1 day ago
+16
Regardless of the validity of any of the info…Peak Listnook, this comment is.
This website is an absolute toilet.
16
Trick-Set-11651 day ago
+175
I mean, that is fundamentally how Freedom of Navigation operations work. Every major navy on the planet has been doing those since the second formalized navy was waterborne.
175
GeorgeCauldron71 day ago
+32
What happened when the first formalized navy was waterborne?
32
Trick-Set-11651 day ago
+69
Who exactly would you be taunting by sailing through contested waters if you’re the only navy out there? If nobody can chase you, where’s the fun in it?
69
iceoldtea1 day ago
+17
Someone else realized they needed to create the second formalized navy… skip a few years and then you’re at [the battle of Salamis](https://www.britannica.com/event/Battle-of-Salamis) and there’s a blueprint for the next 2200 years of naval warfare
17
CoffeePlzzzzzz1 day ago
+5
The cavemen of their enemy tribe grunted angrily and shook their stone axes at them. Then they went on to carve their first boat to contest them.
5
Rand_alThor_1 day ago
+5
We don’t do freedom of navigation exercises against countries we’re at war with.
5
Trick-Set-11651 day ago
+18
History tends to disagree with you, especially in this particular region of the world.
18
Ivehadlettuce1 day ago
+6
They're really aren't any US Flag tankers in the ME.
Unless they willingly attack neutral or GCC ships the Strait opens.
6
SeaworthinessSome4541 day ago
+13
It’s an intermediate step that should be celebrated. A tanker isn’t going to be the first one to try, it was going to have to be a military vessel
13
abgtw1 day ago
+5
Until they sweep for mines even a lone destroyer isn't going to open it up for tankers!
5
SeaworthinessSome4541 day ago
+10
No shit. It’s a start, not proof that passage is safe for everyone.
I swear ppl root for bad things to happen and don’t actually want to see good news. This is great news, it’s the first ship in over a month to pass without Irans approval. Just bc we want the news to be even better doesn’t mean this isn’t a massive step.
10
Terrible_Telephone211 day ago
+6
Most of Listnook in a nutshell, I’ve seen some unhinged people on subs actively rooting for Iran and more so they can dunk on Trump and the US.
6
Less-Jellyfish53851 day ago
+21
Did US tankers go through that strait before?
21
DanIvvy1 day ago
+25
Not particularly, no
25
Omegatherion1 day ago
+14
That's mostly because ships are generally not registered in the US, but rather in Panama?
14
abgtw1 day ago
+17
That and only 8% of US oil comes from the Persian Gulf states to begin with!
17
DarkIllusionsMasks1 day ago
+24
Strait. If you look at it on a map, it isn't even straight. But it goes strait between two large bodies of water. Sort of like the Detroit Strait... er, River.
24
YourBonesAreMoist1 day ago
+15
And here I am still looking for the Gays of Hormuz
15
sevseg_decoder1 day ago
+20
You can always tell who gets their information from Listnook comments and news TV/tiktok when there’s any spelling quirks like this.
Cracks me up because these same people will dog on someone for a pronunciation error when that’s actually excusable imo.
20
Orfez1 day ago
+4
They are clearing mines. It's in the article you didn't read.
4
lowercasenameofmine1 day ago
+7
I don't understand why we keep believing trump when he says "Iran has agreed to...." Whatever he claims they've agreed to.
He keeps lying. Then he can say Iran went back on their agreement, time to make " A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again, I don’t want that to happen, but it probably will."..
7
phoeniks3141 day ago
+970
If Iran is defeated, twice now I think, why does the US need approval from Iran to pass through.
970
10thousndreflections1 day ago
+346
The boy who cried "obliterated"
346
AnteaterFormal72911 day ago
+41
I'm trying to quit drinking so I only drink when he uses the word "decimated" correctly. Trouble is he says it so often that the "broken clock clause" comes into play and I'm still fhckingnhammered
41
SuckOnMyBells1 day ago
+5
Tremendously obliterated! more than you’ve ever seen!
5
mpsteidle1 day ago
+31
They dont? That's the whole point of this crossing.
31
bliss191 day ago
+5
But they didn’t ask for approval?
5
Alt16901 day ago
+6
I mean it’s international waters so they don’t
6
Nodivingallowed1 day ago
+11
They are! And this is their only card!
I think there's a word for that type of card 🤔
11
phoeniks3141 day ago
+13
Definitely not their only card. Iran is insanely far away from defeated, their army won’t just stop existing and can perform attacks on the neighbouring countries as we have seen, basically destroying the world energy market, that’s not a card, but royal flush in hand. They won’t just surrender and here we are, having negotiations in Pakistan with a defeated country.
13
Psychobob22131 day ago
+3
I was told "they don't have any cards" sir. /s
3
Several-Opposite-7461 day ago
+133
He had wanted NATO ships to do this first, before the "cease fire", and called them cowards for not getting on board.
133
NachHymnen1 day ago
+596
Total fake.
It's the internet era and you can track the ships.
USS Michael Murphy (DDG-112) tried to cross and then made a u-turn after iran warning
There's reports that IRGC reported the situation to the delegation in Islamabad and they will fire 30 minutes later if the ship don't stop.
You can see his moves on trakers and it stopped.
Transponder on
596
Difficult-Square-6891 day ago
+142
Searched for trackers but last position was from late Feb. Is there a more recent tracker?
Asking because your info confirms my biases, and that's when I need to be most careful around misinformation.
142
NachHymnen1 day ago
+47
There's plenty.
Marinetraffic.com for exemple
This "incident" happened more than 8hours ago.
47
Difficult-Square-6891 day ago
+45
I can't seem to find DDG 112 on that site, did it get removed?
45
[deleted]1 day ago
+25
[deleted]
25
Difficult-Square-6891 day ago
+27
That's all I could find too, nothing to corroborate the U-turn and last ping was late Feb. Sadly, I think anybody purporting to know what happened is probably lying (on either side)
27
NachHymnen1 day ago
+26
Bingo !
Transponder off so no new info.
Expected for a military ship during wartime
26
dastardly_potatoes1 day ago
+14
The replies from this account look generated to me.
Double quoting "incident"
Providing a link then losing the context of what it was arguing and agreeing that the link is useless.
Probably disregard everything it writes.
14
Aggravating-Neat17681 day ago
+9
I wasn't on board with the "incident" reasoning, but the second thing definitely screams AI generated
9
thedeftone21 day ago
+3
Technically February is more than 8 hours ago
3
Quick-Newt-56511 day ago
+49
There’s absolutely no way you believe the military is always broadcasting their location during wartime operations. At best they delay their movements by a day or so before they release location information. You cannot reliably track where every US warship is from your couch.
49
Bradley2711 day ago
+53
Trackers are absolutely not reliable, military ships will spoof them all the time. The destroyer isn’t gonna be belting out its exact location as it goes through the strait.
53
WhoSaidWhatNow20261 day ago
+16
According to Iran they arent even in Islamabad
16
Minista_Pinky1 day ago
+29
PSA: navy ship movement on civilian trackers aren’t always accurate…
29
Yujin-Ha1 day ago
+130
"The move was not coordinated with Iran" - Uh so it begins?
130
run_midnight1 day ago
+53
I read an article earlier that they're clearing the strait of mines
[link](https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2026/apr/11/middle-east-crisis-live-iranian-officials-arrive-in-islamabad-for-conditional-peace-talks-with-us?page=with:block-69da4ff18f08ff62487f76e7)
53
GonzoVeritas1 day ago
+52
Trump's statement on it:
>*The only thing they have going is the threat that a ship may “bunk” into one of their sea mines which, by the way, all 28 of their mine dropper boats are also lying at the bottom of the sea. We’re now starting the process of clearing out the Strait of Hormuz as a favor to Countries all over the World, including China, Japan, South Korea, France, Germany, and many others. Incredibly, they don’t have the Courage or Will to do this work themselves.*
52
RadCheese5271 day ago
+74
“Don’t have the courage or will to clean up the mess I made for them”
74
DueAd90051 day ago
+28
Ah yes, let's ignore the drones and missiles.
28
csfshrink1 day ago
+16
Mines and missiles and drones. Iran is just trying to scare everyone. Most of the Strait is just water.
It’s like making New York seem scary by focusing on the pimps and the CHUD.
/s
No seriously, Iran can essentially lock down the Strait of Hormuz whenever they want and Trump is the dumbest person trying to fix what he broke.
16
MikeTheActuary1 day ago
+4
>Mines and missiles and drones.
Oh, my!
4
0Hakuna_Matata01 day ago
+16
“I made a huge mess and I’m doing everyone a favor by trying to clean it up”
16
NativeMasshole1 day ago
+20
Truly the most embarrassing time to be an American.
20
CobblerMoney96051 day ago
+7
"All 28 of their mine dropper boats"
Minelayers you ignorant illiterate blob.
7
Yujin-Ha1 day ago
+18
Hmm, this article says that the trip is aimed at "increasing confidence for commercial ships to cross."
I can't imagine Iran would want U.S. ships to clear the mines yet.
18
Dixiehusker1 day ago
+2
I think that pretty much describes the last month.
2
Randomwhitelady21 day ago
+147
Trump is saying this and Axios is quoting unnamed personnel.
First and foremost, Trump is a liar. No one should believe anything he says unless it’s independently confirmed by a reputable source, which Axios is not.
Also, if Iran lets american ships through, aren’t they worried that they are carrying ground troops? I just don’t see it happening with no pushback from Iran.
147
exoriparian1 day ago
+58
Axios is known to run back channel propaganda for US military. Definitely not a source to be trusted.
58
interested_commenter1 day ago
+10
>aren’t they worried that they are carrying ground troops?
Not really. The US has amphibious assault ships in the region that could deploy troops, but it doesn't sound like those are in the Straight. A couple destroyers aren't able deploy any meaningful amount of ground force without a prepared dock.
The destroyers MIGHT be able to provide better cover for an airborne deployment, but even then, Iran would probably rather have those ships close enough to shoot at than have them providing slightly worse fire support
10
0Hakuna_Matata01 day ago
+45
They’re trying to gaslight shippers to send their ships through the strait. If enough ships hit enough mines, the problem will solve itself. It’s basically the ruzzian meat wave attack strategy with oil and gas shipping.
45
PercentageSouth41731 day ago
+13
Why not send unmanned, borderline unseaworthy vessels full of explosives into the strait
If they hit a mine, they detonate and a) can set off other mines and b) don’t pose a risk of blocking to strait if the ship is blown into a million bits
13
Vegetable_Leg_70341 day ago
+21
> don’t pose a risk of blocking to strait
It's narrow and not that deep.. a few wrecks will stop all traffic.
21
PercentageSouth41731 day ago
+8
Don’t have to worry about the wreck if the ship is scattered over a 25 mile radius *taps head*
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SS_Mont-Blanc
8
Bradley2711 day ago
+7
Because it’s obvious BS from people who don’t know how mines work.
7
PercentageSouth41731 day ago
+3
Tbf that explosion would roughly the size of a small nuclear blast
3
Crabbing1 day ago
+2
fantastic idea
2
lowercasenameofmine1 day ago
+26
Interesting given what was reported just yesterday:
* Iran Unable to Find Mines It Planted in Strait of Hormuz, U.S. Says. The lost mines have prevented Iran from quickly complying with President Trump’s demand to allow more ships to pass through the waterway.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/10/us/politics/iran-mines-strait.html
26
nova88081 day ago
+17
Can't truly kick of WW3 until a boat has been sunk.
17
IdiotBOT12341 day ago
+4
Correction: IRGC told them to get lost and they turned around.
4
DCBillsFan1 day ago
+4
Lie. It turned around.
4
Rhenus851 day ago
+73
Axios is Trump's mouthpiece...the source has already been regarded as doubtful
73
RelevantOldOnion1 day ago
+42
That's unfair, this was written by Barak Ravid. He's more Israel's mouthpiece.
42
HarEr891 day ago
+17
Problem is that they are all lying. You can't trust any side here
17
WhereMyNugsAt1 day ago
+6
Isn't that about the worst possible thing to do since the ship would now be on the other side of the strait with no exit but to go back down the extremely predictable path that it came in?
6
Reddit_2_20241 day ago
+5
Grateful to see the U.S. Navy did not have to pay a toll to sail into or out of the Persian Gulf.
5
nopriors1 day ago
+7
This is diplomatic rage bait. If Iran hits the ship, US will flip out and go all in the war- hoping the US citizens get behind him and claim NATO has a responsibility now. If Iran is smart they will let them pass as many times as they want.
A war ship does nothing. Oil ships still have to pay the toll or get fired upon. Literally a game of chicken that nobody will win.
7
HelloYesItsMeYourMom1 day ago
+21
The US sails the Strait and then back out without coming under attack. That was the entire mission.
Iran is unable to attack it because 1. attacking a vessel transiting an internationally used waterway in the middle of peace talks is bad 2. actually sinking a US vessel would actually ensure Trump commits to destroying Irans energy and transportation infrastructure.
21
Judonoob1 day ago
+5
They aren’t going to sink destroyers with some drones. They are too prickly for low tech weapons.
5
bigcat5705031 day ago
+2
What did Trump or Elon pay out of pocket to Iran to cross ? They always want to pay for shit.
2
Ecstatic_Wasabi_51661 day ago
+2
Strait of Hormuz is only 21 miles wide, that's a tight squeeze for warships.
2
are_poo_n_ass_taken1 day ago
+4
Don't touch our boats!
4
neotrance1 day ago
+4
So this whole situation is just going to fizzle out and he gets to claim victory over something he caused, killed people, CHILDREN, caused billions in damage and gas isn't going to be under 3 dollars for the foreseeable future. Awesome... watch his poll number go up again. This country is a joke.
4
Frostymagnum1 day ago
+2
According to unnamed officials. I call BS
2
bernietheweasel1 day ago
+4
First time since Trump started an unprovoked “war” at the behest of Netanyahu and Trump’s Gulf benefactors
4
xRhai1 day ago
+9
Iran ain't doing shit anyway
9
Ultra_Metal1 day ago
+6
Because they can't. They lost most of their military. The regime is crippled.
6
CTPeachhead1 day ago
+2
If they were going into the gulf that's really f****** stupid since once in the gulf manuevers are very restricted and if things heat up again they can't get out without being a sitting duck. It must have been an order from Trump or Hegseth. I doubt a Navy captain would do that unless under duress
If it's a ship leaving the gulf I'm surpised and relieved it remained unscathed over the past month
2
chaklong1 day ago
+7
The article claims they did both, east to west and then back.
198 Comments