· 200 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events May 7, 2026 at 8:05 PM

US will start revoking passports for thousands of parents who owe child support

Posted by Rabidennui


US will start revoking passports for thousands of parents who owe child support, AP learns
AP News
US will start revoking passports for thousands of parents who owe child support, AP learns
The State Department will begin revoking the U.S. passports of thousands of parents who owe a significant amount of unpaid child support.

🚩 Report this post

200 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
TheDadThatGrills 3 days ago +10549
TIL over 2,700 US Passport holders owe more than $100K in child support payments!
10549
Sbarb1000 3 days ago +5497
Will dead beat billionaire fathers have their passports revoked?
5497
Fetlover93 3 days ago +1796
Now we're asking the real questions
1796
PixelGrafx 3 days ago +827
of course not, but you already knew the answer to that xD
827
Vibrant-Shadow 3 days ago +412
Right after they pay their taxes.
412
Graylasagna 3 days ago +369
were gonna have gta 12 before that happens
369
CapnMReynolds 3 days ago +89
And fallout 5
89
Gerik22 3 days ago +75
And Half Life 3
75
jukaisen 3 days ago +95
You shouldnt ask these questions or you may disappear
95
HarryKingJackz 3 days ago +143
They have already acquire the passport from another country.
143
ChangeWooden1380 3 days ago +57
Australia has that possibility fixed by instead implementing Departure Prohibition Orders on severe child support and tax debt defaulters.
57
Renegade_Soviet 3 days ago +65
Is that an actual thing? Do enough billionaires really avoid paying child support on proven offspring?
65
Wers81 3 days ago +89
Musk doesn’t
89
Renegade_Soviet 3 days ago +118
So I looked it up, he does but he’s such a greedy b****** that he files in states with a child support cap. So he does pay and therefore would not have his passport removed
118
lonnie123 3 days ago +104
How does one do that? Wouldn’t you have to pay in the state the child was born or lives? No way you can birth the child and live in Ca and pay Kentucky child support can you? Edit: musk currently lives in Texas, and had the kids in Texas. Thus he is under Texas law which caps the payments. Grimes allegedly moved to San Fran and filed for payment in line with CA but was denied since musk and the kids didn’t live there when the payments were initially set up Sucks for her but it’s just the laws being executed according to the state he and the kids lived in at the time they got set up
104
Miss_Might 3 days ago +98
Nah she signed up for this. She deserves everything that happens.
98
Tinosdoggydaddy 3 days ago +48
Have kids with a known psychopath comes with overhead
48
LOLOLOL7 3 days ago +17
That’s where the Platinum Passport program comes in.
17
FlyingTrampolinePupp 3 days ago +191
I'm shocked that it's that low. I used to be a child support caseworker and inherited a quite a few cases with arrears over $100k. I couldn't say how many off the top of my head but I definitely would have thought there would be more cases based on my experience. Maybe California just has a high concentration of super high arrears cases.
191
_CPR__ 3 days ago +93
I think that's just the count of $100k+ delinquent parents who also have active passports.
93
SeasonPositive6771 3 days ago +60
I used to work in child safety. I couldn't believe how many millionaires had children out there they had abandoned. I worked with more than a few families where mom was caring for kids, living with her impoverished parents, but he was living in luxury with his new family.
60
FlyingTrampolinePupp 3 days ago +59
Ugh it's so many! I worked in 2 counties and one of them was a high earning one with tons of tech bros and professional athletes and I know you're not kidding! For a brief time I worked in the court division to establish child support orders and a tech bro was trying to use his lawyer to strong arm the mom. He had kicked her out for another woman, abandoned his kids, and kept incessantly bringing up how she lived in a small 2 bedroom apartment with her lower income boyfriend and that she should be forced to work so that they could afford a bigger apartment and the kids could have their own room. She was 2 semesters away from graduating from a nursing program and brought the proof to court. You know what he brought to court? The woman he cheated on her with and she had a giant shiny rock on her finger that she kept waving around to try to get the mom's attention. I'll never forget the disgust I felt during that hearing.
59
CHIREU 3 days ago +19
Don't keep us hanging, lol. What was the outcome of the case?
19
FlyingTrampolinePupp 3 days ago +20
Mom was not ordered to work because she had a clear plan toward graduation from her nursing degree. The dad kept huffing and puffing throughout the hearing and trying to have his attorney make outlandish statements and then at one point I heard Dad say to his attorney"f*** it, I'll just take her to court for full custody." His attorney was visibly embarrassed and the mom said "yeah okay you don't even see them now" or something like that. The commissioner admonished both sides for speaking out of turn and told dad to stfu or get out. New wife was making comments under her breath and trying to record the hearing so the commissioner had the officer kick her out. Dad ended up getting nothing he asked for and the judge let him have it for his conduct and was ordered to pay not only the maximum he could based on his high income and lack of visitation, he was also ordered to pay a true up periodically based on his company's stock options and bonuses. Plus health insurance premiums for the kids. My job was to meet with each side after the hearing separately to go over the meat and potatoes of the order, how to make payments, etc. and he blew right past me after the hearing and flipped me off and told me to f*** off with his lady chasing behind lol. His attorney just shook his head, sighed, and stayed behind to wait for the hard copy of the order.
20
singlemale4cats 3 days ago +6
What was the outcome?
6
PatReady 3 days ago +404
The only way they go after people who owe Child Support is Passports and Fishing Licenses. My mom struggled for years not getting any child support and they never did anything to my dad in another state.
404
mostlypercy 3 days ago +208
My dad got his bank accounts and drivers license revoked in Pennsylvania, sorry they had to come for the fishing license…
208
StrengthStarling 3 days ago +145
For real, my dad actually went to jail for falling behind on payments... Not for very long mind you, but enough that he never missed another payment.
145
TooFineToDotheTime 3 days ago +28
Pennsylvania is harder on child support than most.
28
L0ial 3 days ago +20
We’re not perfect, but get some things right
20
zerothreeonethree 3 days ago +41
Decades ago, Michigan Friend of the Court used to help with collections and disputes, but after failing miserably, Michigan enacted a law that required automatic garnishments from wages, SSA payments, etc regardless of whether there was a history of on time payments or not. This applies to all parents, regardless of gender or financial standing. I think they also revoke driver and professional licenses as well. My ex BIL was in arrears several thousand dollars (meaning all but about a dozen sporadic payments in over 10 years), so my sister paid a private detective to find him. Friend of the Court couldn't find him in 7 years, the PI found him in 2 days, living in another state and working for "under the table" salary for a woman with whom he lived. When ex came to visit his family, a bench warrant got issued for failure to pay support . His family had to give the court a cash bond to get him out of jail. After ex appeared in court for the hearing and judgment, my sister was awarded the bond, which still didn't equal all he owed. Ex then worked for awhile and paid support, then decided he was disabled. After fighting 2-3 years of appeals, he was declared fully disabled and awarded a lump sum of back payments, also totalling several thousand dollars. My sister got the balance of what he owed his child, who was now in his late twenties. The rest went back to the state of Michigan to repay welfare that another woman received to support a 2nd child, for whom he had never paid a cent. My sister worked 3 jobs at a time to raise her son, eventually remarried, and together she and her new spouse sent my nephew to college on their own dime. Every penny of the child support ever paid was saved for my nephew, who refuses the money to this day. My sister will not spend it, either. It now totals over 6 figures, after being invested wisely.
41
Rabidennui 3 days ago +1747
$100k right now, but according to the article **“the revocation program soon will be greatly expanded to cover parents who owe more than $2,500 in unpaid child support”** $2500 is like, 6-8 months worth of child support for one child in most states. edit: in some states $2500 is only 2-5 months worth of child support, according to [u/DankVectorz](u/DankVectorz) and [u/you\_are\_my\_sunshine1](u/you_are_my_sunshine1)
1747
ShamrockAPD 3 days ago +472
Where’d you get the math that 2500 is 6-8 months? I knew someone who did not make much money and that would’ve been like… 2 months for him. I feel like your months are way too high (I’m genuinely asking)
472
elciano1 3 days ago +98
Damn. I pay $10k per year...so around $750 per month
98
two4six0won 3 days ago +164
For my sister's ex, that would have been slightly over two years of payments. $100/mo total for two kids.
164
hedoeswhathewants 3 days ago +216
Some fuckery went down there. No way a court is saying $50 a month per kid under normal conditions
216
two4six0won 3 days ago +136
Dude is chronically un/underemployed. Iirc, he was actually in the jail attached to the courthouse when we went in for the finalization of divorce and custody. The judge was unwilling to give him a complete pass, but I believe was required to consider the employment history/situation.
136
DwinkBexon 3 days ago +38
One of my friend's ex's very specifically acted up until he got fired from his job and then stopped paying child support, saying they can't do anything to him if he isn't working so he's safe from any repercussions for not paying. He also said he was completely fine with being evicted when he couldn't pay his rent and becoming homeless over this. He said he'd rather be "free" than be forced to pay child support for a kid he couldn't give less of a f*** about. (He had zero interest in being in this kid's life and said that, as far as he was concerned, he wasn't a father and didn't have a kid.) As it turns out, he was wrong in that assertion.
38
MrLanesLament 3 days ago +37
You cannot draw blood from a turnip. You can, however, try to draw blood from a turnip as much as you fuckin want.
37
[deleted] 3 days ago +49
[removed]
49
tinysydneh 3 days ago +10
Imputed income is broadly "what should you be able to earn?" It's not just around minimum wage. If you historically work a job at $100K/yr, then drop to $40K/yr, unless you have a really good reason for that drop, your calculations will be based on what you *could* be making.
10
jrmdotcom 3 days ago +55
The judge told me you can’t draw blood from a turnip.
55
Ok_Vulva 3 days ago +53
Dudes claim to be private contractors making next to nothing and no one cares. My dad and my ex husband did it. Dad paid $15 per kid, ex got it as low as $75 for one.
53
Han77Shot1st 3 days ago +24
My dad was $1.. and he didn’t pay that lol
24
potterinatardis 3 days ago +19
My ex was supposed to pay $1.00 per month per kid (4 kids = $4.00 per month) and he never paid a dime.
19
Ok_Vulva 3 days ago +11
Lol, my dad went back to court to get it lowered from 15 they said no and I haven't seen him since.
11
techleopard 3 days ago +14
That works until the mom catches them driving a $60,000 Ram truck and goes to court to point out that they're getting assets and under-the-table money. Judges will absolutely skewer dudes caught doing this if there's evidence of it.
14
HurtPillow 3 days ago +8
In NJ, I got $250 a month for 2 kids and that was considered low about 30 yrs ago. I was screwed at that amount.
8
Rabidennui 3 days ago +75
https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/factsheets/2022/demo/p70fs-185.pdf The average amount of monthly reported child support in 2021 was $441.
75
deskbeetle 3 days ago +10
That wouldnt even cover 5 days of daycare where I live 
10
Fedora_Million_Ankle 3 days ago +84
"Why aren't millenials having more kids?!"
84
talldean 3 days ago +8
The average child support payment in the US is a bit under $500 a month. On the flip of it, Kanye and Nick Cannon are both $200k/month or more. Child support amounts vary \*wildly\*.
8
Space_Rock81 3 days ago +7
My daughter’s mother was supposed to pay $50/month. Paid the $50 once a year if I was lucky. She was in a different state and faced zero repercussions from it. She had a warrant from a DUI sentence she never completed in my state and also faced zero repercussions. $2500 is approximately $2000 more than I received in the fifteen-years I received support for my daughter.
7
Area51_Spurs 3 days ago +32
Yea. My friend made like $60k and paid like $1200+ a month when I remember him talking about it years ago. And he also had shared custody and was spending probably another grand a month on the kid himself.
32
DankVectorz 3 days ago +609
$2500 was like 2.3 months worth of child support for me and I didn’t make a lot
609
quirkytorch 3 days ago +149
Child support is typically made using a calculation. What state are you in for it to be that high while also not making "a lot"
149
DankVectorz 3 days ago +166
It was in NJ. I was making about $33k/yr and support was $862/mo. That was back in like 2007.
166
3BlindMice1 3 days ago +146
Today you'd starve to death
146
DankVectorz 3 days ago +148
I would have if I hadn’t enlisted. When I asked the judge how I was supposed to live he told me to get a second job.
148
crab_grams 3 days ago +256
To be fair, that's exactly what my mom had to do taking care of two kids by herself with no child support. Woman can barely walk now. I don't think anyone should have to live like that though.
256
Newtstradamus 3 days ago +19
Yep, 7 weeks for me dawg
19
_Dolamite_ 3 days ago +6
In Oklahoma they can take up to 75% of your income for child support.
6
AlexandersWonder 3 days ago +28
What about parents who never paid the money they owed, and whose children have now grown into adults? Does that stay on the record. I have a friend who’s father was derelict in that way for his entire childhood
28
Powerful_Abalone1630 3 days ago +46
The other parent would still be owed the back child support, yes.
46
EnvironmentalSide576 3 days ago +20
Yes- it stays on the record and when the parent applies fir social security, the social security will have an off set
20
Ok_Yogurt_9862 3 days ago +11
Yes. The state will not forget. If they start working again or receive a settlement or die with assets, the state will collect against it. 
11
applespicebetter 3 days ago +29
I pay ~$1000/month for my son. Not that I begrudge that at all! His Mom takes great care of him and we have a good relationship. My salary is in the mid-five-figure range.
29
Thatsockmonkey 3 days ago +141
And with the new voter suppression rules. Many may not be able to vote. Wow. Let freedom ring. More and more like a banana republic run by billionaires, grifters and pedophiles
141
Kind_Advisor_35 3 days ago +55
The SAVE Act didn't pass and doesn't look like it's going to pass. Republicans are not going to give up the filibuster for the Senate. It's a critical tool for obstruction when they're the minority party, and there's no guarantee that the SAVE Act would make them the permanent majority.
55
JerseyDonut 3 days ago +77
They will weaponize debt, and anything else they can, to further subjugate people.
77
No_Move_6802 3 days ago +150
My father went MIA when I was 12 and he skipped out on paying about $30k in child support.
150
[deleted] 3 days ago +17
[deleted]
17
No_Move_6802 3 days ago +18
He actually moved to my county like 10 years ago. Last I checked, he’s still here. Afaik, I would need my mom to take him to court since she’s technically owed the payments, and she doesn’t have any interest in doing that.
18
upintheair-where 3 days ago +103
My ex owes $65-70k. He chose to quit his job when he was making $150k a year to make $12/hr and also not really see his kids. I paid for two kids daycares on my own when I was a single mom. He had the audacity to say he paid child support and watched the kids so I could go on dates. I paid for their food, housing, clothing, health care, activities, and daycare on my own or with minimal support for years. He went to court and they made him pay $250. Edit to add: Senator Sydnor keeps trying to make child support laws go easier on noncustodial parents. The custodial parents don’t have the option not to pay for their kids.
103
GayMormonPirate 3 days ago +65
Yup. And now my ex is taking vacations to Hawaii and Florida and bought a second house with his new wife but still complains about paying me a whopping $350 a month for his two kids that he barely sees. I see red every time I think about it. We lose so much earning potential because we have to take jobs that allow us to use available daycare hours or because we can't work overtime and our retirement accounts suffer. I don't blame the younger generation of women for never wanting kids. It's not worth it.
65
CharlesIngalls_Pubes 3 days ago +14
I work in a c*****, and one of my favorite things about the job is seeing someone celebrating a j******, only to be paid a slip of paper saying that the money went to unpaid child support.
14
lostbutnotgone 3 days ago +10
Too bad my deadbeat dad has probably never had a passport and therefore this won't affect him at all lmao.
10
chicama 3 days ago +7
My ex is one of them. Almost 200k. They blocked his passport renewal back when it was over 2.5k. If only the federal government would do what the state hasn’t and prosecute him for abandonment and non-support. If I, as the custodial parent, didn’t feed, clothe and otherwise support my kid, I would have been prosecuted long ago.
7
fxkatt 3 days ago +52
I wouldn't even honor these people by calling them "parents." If they owe 100k they've given up that title.
52
coffeemakedrinksleep 3 days ago +1766
This is already the law in the US. I personally know a couple of people who lost their drivers license and/or passport over not paying child support.
1766
slicebucket 3 days ago +763
I went through a divorce in 2008. In 2009, when applying for a passport for business travel to Japan, I was held up for 4 months getting my passport issued because the court thought I owed ~$1300 in back child support. Had to have my ex write a letter to the state for me (thank you) and was on the phone with multiple people every day of the week. Some people hire lawyers to do this for them. Long story short, I don't understand how this wasn't already a thing considering my own personal experience.
763
PolecatXOXO 3 days ago +214
I got laid off from my job overseas and, with cash burning, tried to get my family back to the US. I was held up for a similar 4 months for 2 really stupid reasons. 1st - They didn't believe my child with my second wife was mine, despite us producing copious medical records. We had to wait until their traveling DNA testing doctor came around. In the meantime, they tried to say I needed to "adopt" my own kid, as it would be faster. This ran me right up to passport expiry time, leading to... 2nd - I was faithfully paying child support from my first marriage. My ex-wife, in her infinite wisdom, decided to apply for welfare in 3 bordering states, claiming in two of them that I wasn't paying support and giving addresses for various relatives (committing fraud, basically). This flagged me for passport renewal. The c\*\*ts at the US consulate really thought they got themselves a deadbeat, said it right to my face. I had to wait around for weeks to piece together what was going on, as at first they wouldn't even tell me what state(s) flagged me. Then I had to call the local offices in those states and get them to talk to each other. Another few weeks and all flags were magically lifted.
214
Falkenmond79 3 days ago +101
Your ex sounds like a w*****.
101
SlouchyGuy 3 days ago +51
The fact that US is so huge and prosperous and doesn't have federally connected systems for r united system to track all kinds of stuff will never stop being hilarious to me. In other countries questions with money are solved much more easily
51
Electric_jungle 3 days ago +119
Probably just a law that didn't get regularly enforced that can be used as a means of revoking passports now. I don't see a problem with the law personally, though I don't know all of the downstream impacts.
119
slicebucket 3 days ago +96
I have no problem with the law either on its face, but the state and federal agencies need a better system for coordinating/updating their information. The problem, as explained to me when I FINALLY found the right person who understood and could fix it, was that the state system and fed system are completely separate but connected. So if the state cleared arrears, and the fed still thought I owed it, it would notify the state to put it back on arrears....and vice versa. I had to find someone who was willing and capable of accessing and changing both systems simultaneously.
96
ZebraSandwich4Lyf 3 days ago +145
Not from the US, so please explain to me how taking away somebody's driving licence is effective punishment for not paying child support? How is the that person suppose to drive to work to earn money to pay support if they have no licence?
145
Hopeful-Guest939 3 days ago +117
They're generally given a "hardship" license to drive to/from work if needed. In practice, I've rarely seen license taken because it just complicates everything. With a large number of people, there are too many excuses (like driving to a job) to make it workable. The threat of jail time is the real stick.
117
aphotic 3 days ago +37
This happened to me in the 90s. The official court order my employer received to withhold my support was SHORT of what was needed. After a year or two, that backlog got the attention of the state and they sent me a letter saying my DL was suspended, though I could apply for a license for back-and-forth to work. Contacted a lawyer and he talked to the prosecutor. They put a stay on it, provided I paid back the difference within thirty days. So in the end, wasn't that big of a deal and they updated my withholding letter to the correct amount.
37
winterbird 3 days ago +68
If wages weren't getting garnished, then that person either isn't working or is working under the table to avoid paying child support.
68
badgerl0ck 3 days ago +40
I process people's driving history a lot for my job and I often see revoked licenses in people's history for dropping out of high school. So they're not going to school, but likely need to work, so they drive without a license, then get ticketed for driving without a license.. it all just compounds until their record is screwed and they have to go to court a bunch and pay all sorts of fees. Note: only some US states do this
40
randyboozer 3 days ago +30
Thats really weird. What on Earth does a high-school education have to do with driving?
30
Competitive_Touch_86 3 days ago +49
It's not for not having a diploma, it's for truancy. Which is a crime. It's meant to stop some hypothetical teenager joyride around town instead of going to school. Of course that's roughly as rare as you think it is. So it's a stupid law to begin with.
49
coffeemakedrinksleep 3 days ago +24
It is a punishment. Not saying it is a good law, just the law. It does crack down on people who work under the table, etc to avoid being garnished from legitimate wages.
24
PurpleGarbageDonkey 3 days ago +40
Call me crazy but in a car centric country like the US it seems really stupid to revoke someone's drivers license that owes money regardless of the type of debt.
40
Powerful_Abalone1630 3 days ago +29
Often it's not actually revoked. They're limited to only driving to and from work and maybe things like getting groceries and picking up their kids.
29
DaStompa 3 days ago +5579
Elon musk is going to lose his passport?
5579
random20190826 3 days ago +1025
It doesn't matter, he has a Canadian passport.
1025
CovidBorn 3 days ago +640
Can Canada revoke it just because Elon’s a prick? Like has he ever used the word sorry?
640
jaspersgroove 3 days ago +171
I have to assume that saying "sorry" is part of the application process for a Canadian passport.
171
Own_Reaction9442 3 days ago +109
That's only part of it. You also need a guarantor to apologize on your behalf and two references who will vouch for you having apologized in the past. 
109
Aerodrache 3 days ago +21
Actually, it's been streamlined in the last decade. As long as you apologize for requesting the passport ("sorry, I'm here to get my passport? I guess I just never got around to applying for it before?") you can move on to the next step of the process. If you don't, though, then there's *paperwork* waiting before you can apply.
21
TheOldKingCole 3 days ago +14
Canadian here, can’t say I’ve ever heard him say sorry so he’s probably a Goose in disguise. Speaking from experience.
14
lolofaf 3 days ago +13
You'd think it'd still matter for his security clearance (it would absolutely be a disqualifying factor for any other person during the clearance investigations)
13
kelly1mm 3 days ago +6
Why? He is paying all his court ordered child support, no?
6
2Shmoove 3 days ago +1146
This is standard procedure in British Columbia. 
1146
cl0ugh 3 days ago +442
And its allowed here, but our gov't is also working to try and require passports at voting booths...
442
No-Marsupial-7385 3 days ago +29
Wait… this is tied to voting? Oh Lordy. 
29
WashuOtaku 3 days ago +33
Not the rest of Canada?
33
Shellbyvillian 3 days ago +62
At least in Ontario, I can confirm that they can revoke your driver’s license and garnish your wages. But if you are a deadbeat that is ok driving without a license and working under the table, then you can still get away with paying nothing. Ask me how I know…
62
neurochild 3 days ago +12
> Ask me how I know… Sorry to hear you're a deadbeat 😕
12
strongspoonie 3 days ago +6
I thought it already was in the us too? my deadbeat dad of a cousin lost his passport ages ago this way
6
Pict 3 days ago +1468
So unpaid child support means you can’t vote, also? Thats what the SAVE act is pushing for right?
1468
vi_sucks 3 days ago +850
They're really just trying to screw themselves, considering the massive overlap between "divorced guy who is a deadbeat dad" and "MAGA voter".
850
Efficient_Market1234 3 days ago +387
Also sovereign citizens. Pretty much every sovereign citizen has a suspended driver's license and thousands in unpaid child support hanging over their heads.
387
SmoothDiscussion7763 3 days ago +111
just the type of people we want to stop voting lol
111
FlawedController 3 days ago +77
As much as i hate some people's ideology, I don't think anyone shouldn't be able to vote
77
ImJLu 3 days ago +69
Some people shouldn't be able to vote tbh, but the federal government (especially this one) can't be trusted to decide who.
69
Shitboxfan69 3 days ago +43
Thats something I feel people are losing the plot on right now. Yea sovereign citizens are dumbasses who shouldn't be able to vote. I'd even say people who can't take care of their own kids by paying child support shouldnt be deciding things for functional people. Going even further in the same train of thought, as much as I despise Trump, I don't think a criminal history/current convictions should disqualify someone from running for office. Just as I don't trust the goverment to up and change who can vote, I don't trust them to up and change who can run. If we let the federal goverment up and change who can participate in democracy on a whim, whatever party that's in power will just use it to ban opposition.
43
cakerfaker 3 days ago +67
Men, ESPECIALLY conservative men, don't typically change their last names upon marriage. So, very few men would ever need a passport to vote. Deadbeat *dads* will still have their voting rights.
67
Even_Wasabi_2393 3 days ago +7
You must not live in an urban area
7
BagOfFlies 3 days ago +6
Those guys can still just use their birth certificates.
6
Admirable-Trip5452 3 days ago +203
Yep. Just making it as hard as possible to do anything except stay home and spend money online.
203
Illustrious-Dot-5052 3 days ago +62
That'll entice us to have more kids.
62
raventhrowaway666 3 days ago +48
They dont care, theyll be dead in 10-20 years and will die with a smile on their faces in the safety of their bunkers while the rest of us fight in the upcoming water wars.
48
MrLanesLament 3 days ago +32
Ohio, USA here; I’m a hiring manager. I’ve had multiple employees have to end their employment with us because they lost their driver’s license due to unpaid child support. (Job requires driving.) It’s a law that has never made sense to me; unless you live in a major city, there’s really no public transport in our area. Uber and those are crazy expensive; $70+ one way isn’t unusual. Point being, you need to drive to be able to do most adult things here, including work. Taking someone’s drivers license is basically a guarantee you’re never getting a cent from that person.
32
canteloupy 3 days ago +13
The passport makes sense so they can't just up and leave. The driver's license makes no sense.
13
Detox208 3 days ago +133
My passport was in the queue to be approved when a failure to communicate between two states erroneously flagged my child support in arrears when I had never missed a single payment. It took 3 months and so much time on hold between the two states departments to sort that out.
133
Scaryclouds 3 days ago +224
Hard to be sympathetic towards someone who owes over $100k in child support…  But the articles says that the SoS wants to expand this to anyone who owes more than $2500. I’m not going to claim to be particularly proficient in how child support works, so would welcome any correction. However seems like someone could easily be in breach of that unwittingly or even simple clerical errors on the state could lead to breaching that amount.  Even if well intentioned, the incompetence, often *malicious* incompetence makes me highly suspicious of any action by this administration. 
224
Aarakocra 3 days ago +30
I'm in child support training, and lowering it that much sounds awful. In some cases, that could be as little as three months. But it only takes one bad stint of unemployment to get seriously behind on CS. Especially since in systems like ours, we kind of funnel people into using the system with automatic income withholding orders rather than self-paying. If they change jobs, it can take up to two months to see payments once we know they've changed jobs. If we have to mess around with finding the address to send the documents, it could take another month or two. Then with standard arrear schedules of half of current, it will take twice as many months to get back on track. Do that a few times, and a PPS can end up with over $2500 with a few job changes. I would not be comfortable taking away a passport for less than $10k. Hell, we can start putting liens out at $1000, but we often are really hesitant to do that anyway. A bank lien can lock someone out of their account for months. We have to be really careful to use such powerful tools, because it can f*** someone's life if it happens at the wrong time. Imagine losing access to your bank account when you need to fix your car for work!! It gets even worse with the glacial pace of the court system. If someone is actively trying to get the courts to lower current support (like if they lost a well-paying job), they could easily get over $2500 while waiting for those hearings to happen. Fortunately, we try to suspend such enforcement actions while they are waiting on a hearing. But I can see a situation where the hearing doesn't go the way they want, and now they have $5k in debt to pay. And they should pay it, but passport revocation is not the way to handle that.
30
C-c-c-comboBreaker17 3 days ago +137
Don't forget that a passport is becoming a primary voting document with the SAVE Act.
137
Hardoffel 3 days ago +43
Yeah, when the agency tracking my support payments changed, they lost a whole *year* of payment records because the agency that was tracking them had it on paper and not computerized. This was in 2023.
43
Atopos2025 3 days ago +38
Whats fun about this is that those are the exact documents they want us to use to be allowed to vote. So if the SAVE Act gets passed and you owe child support ......you won't be able to vote.
38
10thousndreflections 3 days ago +21
And I'm sure it will be selectively enforced in blue areas. With last names like Washington, Johnson and Jones. 
21
CatRobMar 3 days ago +205
They are just testing this out and will continue to add infractions to the list, mark my words.
205
TheMovieSnowman 3 days ago +61
Why do you think the only reliable identification under SAVE is a passport?
61
WarriyorCat 3 days ago +22
This has been the law, but they haven't been enforcing the revoking clause. They have been placing applications of people in arrears on hold, but not revoking valid unexpired passports.
22
Some_Number_8516 3 days ago +276
Be wary of anyone that seeks to take people's identification papers
276
Pisces93 3 days ago +58
Exactly, this smells sinister and will be the foundation of further eroding peoples rights
58
Duane_ 3 days ago +10
Republicans don't seem to know how much this will hurt their voter base, lmao.
10
2811357 3 days ago +11
For a country that has cried about gov over reach into your period ball lives esp republicans, funny how you bend over for a peado to be more involved in your life than Putin is in Russia
11
raistan77 3 days ago +32
"Revocation program will be expanded " Kinda sums up the whole situation.  Soon it will be  "Anyone that owes taxes" "Anyone that owes any court fees" "Anyone that owes the government for any reason" Poll taxes at their finest
32
StygianSavior 3 days ago +13
“Anyone who owes student loans.” After all, Trump loves the poorly educated.
13
antiprism 3 days ago +11
It's a short hop from this to revoking passports for non-payment of student loans or credit card debt.
11
Dear_Lab_2270 3 days ago +20
Okay, but if Republicans get their way then you have to provide ID to vote but only some IDs count. Passport is one of them, so if you're taking someone's legal identification away, doesn't that violate their right to vote? I know this is speculation because none of this has happened but I'm trying to visualize what they're seeing as a goal. Make passports the only valid ID, then retain the right to take it from you when you make them mad?
20
Enchillamas 3 days ago +6
Yes, it makes financial punishments the new pole tax.
6
pyromaster114 3 days ago +23
IMHO, the fact that the USA regards a basic identity document as a "privilege", is indicative of some very dark, bad stuff.
23
Cold-Concrete-215 3 days ago +55
How about revoking the passports of those "convicted " of sexual crimes against minors?. IMO that is usually far more damaging than failure to make child support payments
55
FrontFacing_Face 3 days ago +31
Most countries already won't let you travel there with a serious felony. Example: Under Canada’s immigration law, if you have committed or been convicted of a crime, you may not be allowed into Canada. In other words, you may be “criminally inadmissible.” This includes both minor and serious crimes, such as: theft, assault, manslaughter, dangerous driving, driving while under the influence of drugs or alcohol, and possession of or trafficking in drugs...
31
afleischer 3 days ago +17
Wooooow. “You will need your passport to vote in November in many circumstances (which just happens to disenfranchise a ton of the voters we don’t care about).” “Oh and we figured out an avenue to rescind the passports of millions of citizens. TOTAL COINCIDENCE! And what’s funny is we don’t even have to concoct a distraction, people will just go nuts arguing about whether people who owe child support should have a passport! 4D CHESS!!”
17
xynith116 3 days ago +192
But not for pedophiles huh
192
PackMan93 3 days ago +60
Pedophiles, unless already been to jail, aren't exactly in the system like those who don't pay child support.
60
Kevbot1000 3 days ago +61
Correct. They're running the system.
61
DeMessenZijnGeslepen 3 days ago +34
Basically anyone with a criminal record is barred from travelling abroad anyways. Most countries won't let you in.
34
rolyoh 3 days ago +35
But they still won't defend the Epstein victims.
35
Communistnachos 3 days ago +13
Pushes for law to require passports to vote Revokes passports for a non-trivial portion of the population
13
IAmTheClayman 3 days ago +37
I’m sorry, but I don’t understand this. Your ability to pay child support and travel are not intrinsically linked. What if you have a job that requires you to travel internationally? Are you just expected to lose your job because you haven’t paid, and wouldn’t that just make it harder to pay? This 100% feels like cause to prevent lower income people from being able to vote, and this is not a left or right issue: it’s a class issue. The oligarchs want to disenfranchise the poors, and this feels like an easy win that people won’t push back on. First it’ll be this, next it’ll be people with outstanding parking tickets, or people who have used VPNs
37
Bright_Commission_63 3 days ago +6
ohhh, so thats how the Save America Act is going to disenfranchise whole sections of the legal voting population.
6
MyDishwasherLasagna 3 days ago +7
how many people with certain backgrounds are going to find out their passports were invalidated "by mistake" (it was intentional)? trans people who already had their passport changed before trump, americans with spanish/latin-sounding last names, married women whose birth certificate doesnt match their married name, and so on...
7
Chrios5o6 3 days ago +6
What's the correlation here? Are they worried about flight risks or are they just looking for any reason to revoke passports for citizenship shenanigans?
6
Miss_Might 3 days ago +6
Doesn't felon musk owe one of his baby mamas support or something? God that would be hysterical if he refused to pay and his passport was pulled.
6
mexi_exe 3 days ago +6
The Trump administration is going after its own base? It’s a bold strategy Cotton. Let’s see if it pays off.
6
ImADoctorIfISayIAm 3 days ago +5
There's gonna be a whole new group of MAGA that shits their pants.
5
MhuzLord 3 days ago +5
But that's a significant amount of Trump voters
5
sailingtroy 3 days ago +7
Doesn't that mean they won't be able to vote? That's fucked.
7
Chang-San 3 days ago +6
The govt starting the rollout to prevent people from leaving the hell hole they created
6
Jumpy_Chemistry_417 3 days ago +6
It's wild to think over 2,700 people owe six figures for child support, but using passport revocation seems like the only way to get their attention. Also, mixing voting rights into the SAVE Act feels like a slippery slope that turns financial disputes into a constitutional mess.
6
wastingtimeonreddit_ 3 days ago +7
Anything to not let people vote
7
Orion13Quest 3 days ago +6
My child's mother filed for child support two years after they were born, thusly putting me in the hole $10k. I received notice of forfeiture of any tax refunds I might be due, & revocation of my passport since my arrears were more than $2,500. This administration is playing in our faces & those that are unaware are believing what they're told.
6
saieddie17 3 days ago +6
Why is this a federal government problem?
6
JAX2905 2 days ago +5
This is already law. They’re announcing this so they can come after the next group.
5
ike7177 3 days ago +592
Actually, this is one I can support. If you can’t support your children then you can’t afford to travel. Once you pay up, re-apply Edited to add: If you all are excusing a parent from supporting their children because you want them to vote, that’s absolutely more sad then losing that vote. Do you want people voting for your (and your children’s) future that can’t even make basic and moral decisions for their own children? Edit 2: The Passport is NOT required to vote. You all need to go look at the required documents accepted in your state in order to vote
592
serious_sarcasm 3 days ago +476
This was already a thing. They’re only doing this now to make it harder to vote when they demand a passport to vote.
476
MonacoBall 3 days ago +112
It’s already legally mandated but poorly enforced
112
serious_sarcasm 3 days ago +86
Because it’s rarely effectual in enforcement. If the parent is actually a flight risk, or travels commonly, then it is regularly enforced. They’re just trying to disenfranchise as many voters as possible.
86
Fyne_ 3 days ago +144
Sure, but then you realize they are also trying to push the act that makes a passport one of the required forms of documentation to vote. And they are counting on this impacting more POC, who generally vote dem
144
wwaxwork 3 days ago +32
My husband took his passport to vote in our primaries we had here the other day, he had a drivers license but was very much in a f*** you I'm not taking any chances frame of mind I'll bring the best ID I have. His was the first they'd had all day and no one knew what to do with it or how to tell if it was real they called some sort of supervisory person over to check it out. Election day is going to be a clusterfuck if people people bring passports. If our primary voting location was anything to go by the people in where the fucksville Indiana apparently have never seen a US passport.
32
SoberBobMonthly 3 days ago +18
This shit is why we don't have any voter ID requirements in Australia, and manage it all through enrolment list checks to ensure there is no double dipping.  Middle of the desert people don't have ID's that commonly, and passports are expensive. Literally cheaper to instead have proper voter fraud enforcement actions instead. 
18
Xin_shill 3 days ago +91
I think they don’t realize how many MAGAs are not paying child support
91
Li_liminal_spaces 3 days ago +55
I suspect it will be selectively enforced.
55
cpslcking 3 days ago +19
ID laws are already selectively enforced. Go to any small town voting booth where everyone knows everyone else. The volunteers don't bother to check IDs or verify residency, they just hand out ballots to anyone they know that stops by. Whose going to stop them, the corrupt Sheriff that rubs elbows with everyone? This only matters in cities where the population is large enough that people have to check and where not coincidentally lean more Democrat.
19
ZackRaynor 3 days ago +17
I’d be more surprised if it wasn’t selectively enforced with all the evidence the current administration has provided thus far.
17
BiscottiCritical6512 3 days ago +57
All the deadbeat parents I know of are repubs 🤷‍♀️ 
57
SomeBaldDude2013 3 days ago +16
Yeah I know of two guys that have skipped out on paying child support and they’re both MAGA lol. This may backfire on them. 
16
badash2004 3 days ago +14
I think thats a terrible way to look at voting. I think voting is a right that every American adult has, and the government should not be able to take it away under any circumstances. And yes, that means I think that there is no crime that should take someone's voting rights away, and I am especially against the SAVE act.
14
C-c-c-comboBreaker17 3 days ago +63
A passport is becoming one of the primary voting documents with the SAVE act. This is an attempt at restricting voting access
63
skyforgesteel 3 days ago +54
This is how they start. Again, they make it "for the children" to trick people into accepting that it's okay to revoke identification papers. Then they can do it for all 'undesirables.' I got my passport with my gender marker under the Orr v Trump injunction. They'll revoke mine next. Then all democratic voters.
54
kaylaisidar 3 days ago +11
Don't they also want to require passports to vote?
11
newtman 3 days ago +10
This looks cool on the surface, but I bet it’s a way for the Feds to test the public’s appetite for starting to restrict the movement of Americans for arbitrary reasons.
10
CrossFire_tx 3 days ago +11
Welp, this may hurt MAGA more than help.
11
KindCompetence 3 days ago +20
I really don’t like the idea of removing people’s passports for reasons other than deciding they aren’t US citizens or they’re serious flight risks from a criminal case. We are pulling a lot of shenanigans around demanding that random people prove they are American citizens, and passports are the easiest way to have that proof.
20
Diplomat_of_swing 3 days ago +19
You have to question people who are always in favor of revoking IDs, Rights, citizenship and want to police movement. they will offer very legitimate sounding reasons, who doesn’t want people to care for their own kids. But when you look at the whole picture this is very likely not about child support and more about class. This will disproportionately hurt working class and low income people who do t have the resources to fight it or to honor their commitments.
19
Tastyfishsticks 3 days ago +19
Garnish wages, lien property, back pay from future social security to adult children. No wages what can you do. Taking a passport maybe hurts a handful of people but it doesnt do anything for the kids support.
19
thitmeo 3 days ago +18
For anyone who thinks "good, those deadbeats don't deserve to travel and need to pay up", just realize that it won't stop here. This government taking away ID methods and restricting travel will not stop at child support issues. Next it will be some other reason...And you can be sure those punished with this will be selectively chosen to punish and whomever they want. The poors, women who got abortions POC, Dem voters...
18
Chaos_Theory1989 3 days ago +10
What about child rapists? 
10
wufiavelli 3 days ago +12
Wonder if this will expand to student loans or other debt
12
BlueAndYellowTowels 3 days ago +9
Personally, I don’t like this. Just torching a person’s identification makes no sense. There are other ways to punish people. Refusing them the ability to have valid, legitimate identification is gross.
9
KathyJaneway 3 days ago +12
Ah, so that's why they wanted a passport to be used for voting. They know the breakdown on who's not paying child support, and if they take the passports as well, then they won't be able to vote either...
12
Sir_Tandeath 3 days ago +10
Ah, this just after rolling out the plan to require ID to vote? Not even hiding it.
10
That_90s_Kid_ 3 days ago +4
Remember the save act. Theyre removing voters. Not passports. If the save act passes. They cannot vote.
4
← Back to Board