· 65 comments · Save ·
Questions & Help Mar 15, 2026 at 10:09 PM

Use the stairs, work from home: Asia is already making big changes as oil prices spike

Posted by Skippy_AF


https://www.nbcnews.com/world/asia/asia-already-making-big-changes-oil-prices-iran-war-rcna263105

🚩 Report this post

65 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
fuck-nazi Mar 15, 2026 +296
Work from home, for those who are able to, benefits everyone.
296
Comfortable_Yam_9391 Mar 16, 2026 +106
Well not the suits that own the offices. Unfortunately that’s all that matters.
106
beyondplutola Mar 16, 2026 +25
Most of the suits are renting the office.
25
ValuableSoggy5305 Mar 16, 2026 +16
And with that much capital down, they really want to be sure people are *using* that investment, stupid or not. Especially if they, as part of a diverse portfolio, part or entirely own a company whose raison d'être is leasing office space. Perverse incentives are a hell of a thing
16
AutoRot Mar 16, 2026 +6
I know it’s difficult to turn office buildings into residential, but surely they could be converted into something more beneficial to society. “But we’ve already built them” isn’t a great reason to continue a wasteful approach. Literally a sunk cost fallacy.
6
Ramental Mar 16, 2026 +4
In Europe there are regulations as to have X schools, Y parks and Z hospitals per XYZ population. Cities intentionally do not build 20-storey residential buildings. Converting offices into residential can cause a cascade of infrastructure issues.
4
Rumpel1408 Mar 16, 2026 +7
Well, turn some office buildings into schools, some into hospitals, and some, I guess, into parks
7
Comfortable_Yam_9391 Mar 16, 2026 +3
Yeah but one of big office valuations is the occupancy rate. If there’s a low occupancy rate, then the building isn’t as valuable. That’s why they had to send us back to the office because making money office real estate was basically guaranteed as it gets before COVID, and occupancy rates plummeting set the owners of the real estate up for catastrophic loss in a previously low risk investment. Call up your boys at McKinsey and they offer a brilliant solution, return all workers to the office so the real estate doesn’t collapse, and you can fire everyone that doesn’t comply without paying them severance. It’s a win /win for all the suits, not so much for the common plebe that has to drive an hour each way and pay (now) war induced gas hikes.
3
beyondplutola Mar 16, 2026 +1
Most companies are not commercial realtors. They rent from commercial realtors. Commercial rent is overhead.
1
Comfortable_Yam_9391 Mar 16, 2026 +2
I think we’re talking about different suits? Commercial real estate is like 10% of our GDP, both the commercial realtors and the C suite require that to not collapse so they can make money. Commercial rent is overhead, but if that overhead lets you lay off thousands of people without paying severance, it’s worth it. Also not including the various deals and tax breaks the company gets in negotiation with the city and realtor.
2
beyondplutola Mar 16, 2026 +1
Suits are most of corporate America. They would love nothing more than to pay zero for commercial space. The topic is WFH. WHF has the potential to save companies a lot in overhead (rent).
1
Comfortable_Yam_9391 Mar 16, 2026 +1
I just think the suits would rather reduce their employee count instead of giving employees more freedom to WFH. Because basically every corporation is doing RTO now, even though they should let employees WFH to save costs. Unless, they are saving that overhead from cutting employees or having people voluntarily quit. Also if the GDP blows out because half of offices shut down all the suits lose their precious targets and stock losses
1
blewnote1 Mar 16, 2026 +3
Also not all the businesses created to support people near offices... Restaurants, stores, dry cleaners, etc.
3
Comfortable_Yam_9391 Mar 16, 2026 +2
Yes, the economy is sustained by getting the plebes out and about to consume.
2
Geo217 Mar 15, 2026 +192
The Australian government are so terrified of big business and equally offending city coffee shop owners that they wont go near this. Governments in Asia just do it and get on with it.
192
LiteratureOk2428 Mar 15, 2026 +93
Same in Canada, 90% of federal employees were working from home over covid. Its creapt up.. 4 days a week is coming this summer. 
93
Geo217 Mar 15, 2026 +37
In the context of the current issue, Australia faces the same issue as these Asian countries over oil. The contrast in messaging from the government couldnt be more different.
37
DepletedMitochondria Mar 16, 2026 +3
Wow and private sector in the us you barely get 2
3
I_am_the_grass Mar 16, 2026 +14
This comment is terribly timed. The Victoria government just announced mandatory 2-days work from home beginning September.
14
Geo217 Mar 16, 2026 +19
Arent we talking about the federal government here?
19
I_am_the_grass Mar 16, 2026 +5
Well a state government in Australia clearly wasn't scared enough to do it. And if I were the federal government, I'd let the states take the lead and see the effects on businesses (both F&B and businesses with a predominantly in-office workforce). Victoria is probably the best test bed for this with a dominant CBD that relies on office workers, lots of white-collar businesses and a big enough population (7mil) where you'd actually see a measurable impact.
5
Lokon19 Mar 16, 2026 +2
Population is much denser in most major Asian cities.
2
eldiablo22590 Mar 16, 2026 +11
What does that have to do with the efficacy of wfh?
11
Lokon19 Mar 16, 2026 +9
Nothing it has to do with dead downtowns and urban areas with decreased foot traffic.
9
tapdancinghellspawn Mar 15, 2026 +415
Work at home? But all of those CEOs are demanding workers return to work.
415
Nachofriendguy864 Mar 15, 2026 +85
Why just this week the vp of my business segment told me driving to the office to sit at my desk and talk to people on teams was "10x better" than me walking to my bonus room to sit my desk and talk to people on teams
85
shouldco Mar 15, 2026 +39
If it was that much better then surely they would be willing to pay you 5x as much for it.
39
Confident-Beyond6857 Mar 16, 2026 +9
I'm in a similar situation. I am the only person on my team for 800 miles. I literally cannot work with anyone face to face. They still want me to drive to the closest office, which has none of my coworkers nor management present, to use Teams. That office isn't even in the same business segment. I've just flat ignored it. My own management says its the dumbest requirement and they choose to ignore it.
9
Th3FinalStarman Mar 15, 2026 +103
*return to the office. Everyone employed is already working.
103
tapdancinghellspawn Mar 16, 2026 +9
Not without a lot of threats from management.
9
Who_Dafqu_Said_That Mar 16, 2026 +33
I'm 100% convinced this idiotic "return to office" push is execs have cover when they cheat on their spouses. Hard to pull the old "honey, I'm working late" when you're in the next room.
33
Mother_Idea_3182 Mar 16, 2026 +11
I had a boss that bought us all CS to play with him after work hours so he had an excuse to not go home too early. He was not a cheater, his wife make him miserable.
11
thegodfather0504 Mar 16, 2026 +2
How is he doing?
2
ronnysteal Mar 16, 2026 +1
Fortuna... They're paying pretty badly like idiots for their stupidity... HO is superior for most all office tasks. I hope these motherfuc**** are going crazy and bleed for their power plays
1
SidewaysFancyPrance Mar 16, 2026 +1
A few decades ago, POTUS would have addressed the nation and its CEOs and asked us all to conserve energy as a patriotic action. There would be talk of potential rationing. WFH would have been offered proudly by all companies where possible and there would have been efforts to drive adoption. But nope, POTUS wants profits in his pockets as a priority. Forget GDP or jobs, Big Oil is first at the trough while also making trillions through profiteering. CEOs are desperate to please Trump but he never asks for anything that helps America as a whole, so they never offer that.
1
jgengr Mar 16, 2026 +15
Make sure your car tires are properly inflated.
15
Saerdna0 Mar 15, 2026 +115
This is going great you guys! Oh and release the Epstein files.
115
Skippy_AF Mar 15, 2026 +17
I need to see the un redacted files.
17
DeepBreathOfDirt Mar 16, 2026 +4
I don't think any normal person would ever want to see those files in their entirety.
4
laplongejr Mar 16, 2026 +1
We want them unredacted *except what infringe the privacy of the victims*. And because apparently we have to make it clear to the US gov, we consider "victims" the people who were "f*cked without consent", not the rich people annoyed that the victims "damaged their reputation" by revealing they were interesting into r.... children. ... Can I hope to have the monkey's paw on my side?
1
Ripraz Mar 15, 2026 +24
I wonder how many years it will take Italy to start adapting to the change
24
Ediwir Mar 16, 2026 +10
That would require tech literacy. Having lived in Italy until a short while ago… that means it’s still quite a few funerals away.
10
sukisecret Mar 16, 2026 +18
We have to go back to the office cuz ceo doesn't want to see an empty office. Guess who doesn't even come in to the office?
18
gogurt2020 Mar 16, 2026 +18
whoa so much of Southeast Asia is limiting fuel consumption bc of the blockade. This could signal an economic slowdown. Not great.
18
DepletedMitochondria Mar 16, 2026 +2
That's why Iran is doing this
2
Pro-Masturbator Mar 16, 2026 +6
I get that the headline focuses on oil prices cause thats what a western reader cares about, but where the US doesnt get the majority of its oil from OPEC so the increasing prices are a nuisance, OPEC IS asia's petroleum supply. Like, gas stops coming out of the pump if this goes on too long. They have quite an interest in the SOH being opened fast and staying open.
6
beyondplutola Mar 16, 2026 +4
The Japanese auto Industry may need to rethink its aversion to EVs.
4
LowIllustrator2501 Mar 16, 2026 +5
I get working from home, but stairs? How is this related to oil price? 
5
Confident-Beyond6857 Mar 16, 2026 +5
You don't see how a large electrical device could possibly be tied to energy availability at all?
5
haydar_ai Mar 16, 2026 +4
To not use elevator I guess
4
LowIllustrator2501 Mar 16, 2026
I've never in my life used an elevator that uses oil. 
0
ResortMain780 Mar 16, 2026 +4
But the electricity it does use is very often generated by burning gas. That said, Im not convinced this would be a net saving; using the stairs uses energy which need replenishment through food, the production of which also heavily depends on oil and gas. The production cycle from fertilizer to plate is longer, so the effects in food availability and prices will only really start hurting in 6 months or so, rather than now, so i guess short term it might help theoretically some unmeasurably small fraction of a percent? long term an elevator is probably more efficient.
4
BakedInSpace Mar 16, 2026 +8
The energy expenditure from a person taking the stairs is probably still less than an elevator. And if anything it would also help keep people a little more in shape which would be helpful in people needing to use less resources
8
SilentJerrySpringer Mar 16, 2026 +1
Motors draw a lot of energy, and since elevators are more of a convenience than a necessity, walking up the stairs saves power for more important functions.
1
Septopuss7 Mar 16, 2026 +2
Ah yes the country of Asia
2
geologicalnoise Mar 16, 2026 +1
The only reason I like going into the office is the cheesesteak shop around the corner. Other then that, my IT makes my job near impossible to do from the office, and in between waiting for projects to export I've begun work on a comic strip depicting my war against their ineptitude.
1
Mrjlawrence Mar 16, 2026 +1
Imagine the outrage if Trump told Americans to drive their mid size SUV instead of their Ford F-250
1
porgy_tirebiter Mar 18, 2026 +1
Japan will not be among the countries working from home. Pretending to be busy in front of your boss is the cornerstone of Japanese culture.
1
Electrical_Rip9520 Mar 16, 2026 +1
Asian countries are the most affected by the conflict.
1
Drowyx Mar 15, 2026 -43
>work from home Yeah sure, everyone should just magically start working from home.
-43
ArugulaAnnual1765 Mar 16, 2026 -3
Not sure why this is being downvoted. Im a programmer who can perform 100% of his duties wfh. Not exactly sure how something like a mail man could work from home (Maybe he can send emails instead)?
-3
Who_Dafqu_Said_That Mar 16, 2026 +7
Yeah, there's no possible way it could mean those who can work from home should. No, it obviously means every single job should be 100% work from home...
7
ArugulaAnnual1765 Mar 16, 2026 -2
His comment is that EVERYONE should be working from home. Not seeing how you are misinterpreting an obvious attempt at sarcasm?
-2
Fookmaywedder Mar 15, 2026 -24
Yeah, I’m remote tapping into my semi truck right now and will meet with remote warehouse workers who will remotely load the product inside. Get with the program here
-24
Tailor-DKS Mar 15, 2026 +1
Just sell your car and use the garage as small warehouse owned by the company, ceo love this.
1
← Back to Board