· 65 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Mar 28, 2026 at 12:27 PM

Using US ground troops against Iran could prove very costly, retired generals say

Posted by SnoozeDoggyDog


Using US ground troops against Iran could prove very costly, retired generals say
ABC News
Using US ground troops against Iran could prove very costly, retired generals say
Retired generals told ABC News that using U.S. ground troops against Iran would significantly escalate the war and carry a steep risk of American casualties.

🚩 Report this post

65 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
PopPalsUnited Mar 28, 2026 +63
We're now weeks into a war that has never be justified by this administration. No declaration of war by congress yet we're sending thousands of US troops to the region. Trumps clown at the DoD also wants Americans to cough up $200B more dollars for this bullshit. This war is illegal and this administration is blatantly corrupt.
63
Efficient_Resist_287 Mar 28, 2026 +9
GOP Congress refuses to step into this slow moving fiasco and squeeze those brakes. It is evident Iran will not back down and is ready to sacrifice for this.
9
jazznessa Mar 28, 2026 +11
Americans really need to learn civics and why strikes and protests are a thing.
11
Efficient_Resist_287 Mar 28, 2026 +5
It is not in their DNA. In France, the country would be at an economic standstill by now. France is a society born from a sociopolitical rebellion against authority/social status quo. The US is a patriarchal society with historically strong religion and a rigid racial hierarchy. U obey the patriarch (white man) even if he is in the wrong. Don’t believe all the “democracy” talk…in the US, u obey the authority except, of course, if that authority is not white. There were more virulent protests against Obamacare.
5
rajastrums_1 Mar 28, 2026 +2
France has had protests, violent protests for centuries. Perhaps we could persuade them to help. Send us the Lafayette of French rebellion. They would train us in strategy and tactics. Serious resistance.
2
Greedy_Case_4194 Mar 28, 2026 +21
If iraq was a "walk in the park" (which turned out to be a marathon through a minefield), iran is basically trying to play dark souls on sl1 with a broken controller. the geography alone makes Afghanistan look like a suburban backyard. we'd be sinking trillions into a literal fortress of a country just to end up with another 20-year "oopsie" that leaves the region more unstable than we found it. history doesn't repeat, but it sure does love to rhyme when there's oil and ego involved.
21
AreYouDoneNow Mar 28, 2026 +1
Iran has a smaller military than Iraq did in 1990, but times have changed. Iran has the largest arsenal of ballistic missiles and drones in the Middle East. Their ability to conduct asymmetrical warfare is notable and should not be taken lightly... they may use these to inflict significant civilian casualties. But I have a feeling nobody in this war cares about that. Dark times.
1
iownlotsofdoors Mar 28, 2026 -1
what’s the llm model they’re using for these now
-1
SquirtBox Mar 28, 2026 +12
The guy who sent them in: https://imgur.com/2ge9xnz
12
eskimoboob Mar 28, 2026 +14
Let’s not forget Congress allowing it by not stepping in. The whole GOP is to blame.
14
W31337 Mar 28, 2026 +8
GOP, Grifters Oligarchs and Pedos
8
Altair05 Mar 28, 2026 +1
And the people who votes these guys in And the people who slept on thr last election. They are all to blame.
1
Pump_and_Magdump Mar 28, 2026 +14
In both meanings of the word. They will be in hostile territory outnumbered thousands to one. So of course they are going to die at very high rates. And because the only thing giving them any protection at all is very expensive equipment, we're also going to lose that at the very high rates. The loss of life is obviously the far more important factor to everyone who isn't f****** psychotic, but both are going to wear us down.
14
AreYouDoneNow Mar 28, 2026 +14
> f****** psychotic Have you seen the people in charge? For all three primary nations in this war? This is not going to end well.
14
MacaroonSpecialist10 Mar 28, 2026 +10
The loss of life is the entire point. They need a bunch of dead Americans to justify a nuclear attack. The false flag on US soil is imminent as well
10
jayfeather31 Mar 29, 2026 +3
> They need a bunch of dead Americans to justify a nuclear attack. That's what really scares me. Trump strikes me as potentially insane enough to actually do it.
3
United_Reaction35 Mar 28, 2026 +3
It works both ways too. Let's remember how Iran fought Iraq; human waves of young kids attacking night after night. How long will the American public support the Marines slaughtering Iranian children in their own country?
3
zerocoolforschool Mar 28, 2026 +1
If ever there was a time for China to attack Taiwan, this is it.
1
Imaginary-Ad-7919 Mar 28, 2026 +5
Experts have been warning for months that the conflict could drag on and become far more costly than originally projected.
5
Bittererr Mar 28, 2026 +7
>months Decades. Not having to put boots on the ground in Iran has been the impetus behind most of our actions in the region for this entire century. It's why Obama made a deal.
7
FlyingRock Mar 28, 2026 +2
Yep, just look at the [geography](https://i0.wp.com/the-lookout.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/relief_map_of_iran-credit_blue_green_atlas-scaled.jpg?ssl=1) of Iran, there's a reason no one wants to attempt boots on the ground action against the country.
2
Romantic_Piscean Mar 28, 2026 +6
It's in the interests of many in the Middle East to get the US to engage in a long-term war, to get to fighting the US and not just a proxy in Israel, and Russia sees this as a path to conflicts like Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, Afghanistan (the US version), Ukraine, etc. And the only true strategic interest we have is trying to stabilize the region after we initiated this war. Not only could it be costly, in many ways, there are a number of countries that want it to be costly, and that's not limited to Iran.
6
Rambaz_69 Mar 28, 2026 +5
Ground warfare has changed significantly in recent years. We are seeing this firsthand in Ukraine. The way Russian soldiers are being decimated there as they attempt to advance could also happen to American troops in a ground operation. On Kharg Island and in the coastal area near the Strait of Hormuz, soldiers would be exposed to drones with little protection. And Putin will certainly send the Iranians all the drones and probably also the necessary personnel for operations and training. Then Trump will surely be quite surprised again that Putin would do something so mean.
5
Jaded-Moose983 Mar 28, 2026 +1
>Putin will certainly send the Iranians all the drones  You've got that backwards. Iran has been supplying Russia with drones. Ukraine has supplied the US with anti drone education.
1
krypticus Mar 28, 2026 +3
It’s flipped: Russia took the Iranian designs and have been mass producing and improving them: https://apnews.com/article/russia-iran-drones-shahed-war-israel-ukraine-840b4f885d99714bdb7813c0d56213cf
3
Rambaz_69 Mar 28, 2026 +2
Didn’t Ukraine offer Trump last summer to supply its drone defense system and its attack drones, and didn’t Trump reject that? If I recall correctly, Trump said they have the best drones themselves and that the Ukrainians are the last people from whom they would accept assistance. But now Ukraine is negotiating directly with various Arab countries regarding a drone defense system based on the Ukrainian model and has already signed contracts. All without Trump.
2
zerocoolforschool Mar 28, 2026 -1
Okay hold up. The way Russian soldiers are being decimated is because Russia has been sending basically meat shields from prisons and small towns with zero training and forcing them to death charge into Ukrainian positions. They can barely be called soldiers. Now they’re drugging them with meth. Russia wasted all their best guys in the first few weeks of the war. Now they’re sending bodies with equipment from the 60s and 70s. The US should not invade but the two militaries really are not at all comparable.
-1
Rambaz_69 Mar 28, 2026 +1
You’re absolutely right; you can’t compare Russian soldiers to well-trained American soldiers. But if Americans were to occupy the coastal strip along the Strait of Hormuz or Kharg Island, they would suffer casualties as well. These days, even tanks are being destroyed by drones—so what would happen to soldiers without much protection? If drones with fiber-optic controls, operated by Iranians from 10 kilometers away, attack an unprotected soldier, things don’t look good for him. I don’t know if Hegseth has figured that out yet, but Trump certainly hasn’t.
1
zerocoolforschool Mar 28, 2026 +1
I agree. The US hasn’t faced the drone warfare yet. They have had years to study Ukraine and they supposedly have countermeasures but hard to say how effective. Overall it’s a terrible idea.
1
Rambaz_69 Mar 28, 2026 +1
Yeah, and all because Trump wants to divert attention from the Epstein files.
1
zerocoolforschool Mar 28, 2026 +2
You might be right, but I also think Israel is in the driver seat on this one.
2
Fit_Blackberry_5146 Mar 29, 2026 +2
Trump may be being blackmailed by the Israelis over the Epstein files.
2
J-the-Kidder Mar 28, 2026 +6
Let's adjust this to reality and remove the word "could" to "will" prove to be very costly. There is no reality or planet where an invasion of that country doesn't have an enormous and significant cost, in every possible way. That certainly is only cemented by the clowns in charge.
6
wasabi_dream Mar 28, 2026 +4
Why is the US in this war, and how does it help make America great again? Because I see lots of dead people: children, adults, soldiers. I see ecological catastrophe and economic hardship. Can somebody tell me what's better now?
4
redoctobershtanding Mar 28, 2026 +4
Because Israel said "let's do this 😉", Trump said "Ok, because oil and riches".
4
United_Reaction35 Mar 28, 2026 +2
This war is for Israel. It is the classic example of the 'tail wagging the dog'.
2
EntrepreneurTop5670 Mar 28, 2026 +8
When you've got two seasoned, battle hardened warriors like Trumpty Dumpty and Kegsbreath leading the charge, what is there to worry about?
8
Reviews-From-Me Mar 28, 2026 +4
Trump is a sociopath who sees everyone else as toys to play with.
4
W31337 Mar 28, 2026 +4
As long as people forget the Epstein files... /s
4
Significant-Self5907 Mar 28, 2026 +4
As long as people are getting what they voted for. PFT!
4
loztriforce Mar 28, 2026 +4
While laws don’t seem to matter anymore, there’s still the countdown of how long Trump has to wage war without declaring it. I fear Trump’s ego will demand he comes out on top, even though they have the cards, making the use of a nuke more likely imo.
4
Peacer13 Mar 28, 2026 +4
As an active armchair general, I concur with the retired general. Holding lowlands, surrounded by mountains, trying to protect a 2-5 km wide traversable strait.
4
Stoic_cave Mar 28, 2026 +3
Even armchair generals know this.
3
SnoozeDoggyDog Mar 28, 2026 +3
Unfortunately, not like this admin actually listens to experts anyway......
3
whatproblems Mar 28, 2026 +3
bah what do they know, we’re running on vibes and feelings
3
on-strike Mar 28, 2026 +3
I keep reading about this war, this article talks about battlefield dominance and seizing Kharg Island as a method of economic attack, but I'd be a lot more confidant if Trump hadn't surrounded himself with losers like another article mentioned some hours ago.
3
NotAnotherEmpire Mar 28, 2026 +3
The US has scored very badly against FPV drone warfare in exercises. Going in against a country that's been working in the conflict where they are dominant is going to result in a lot of losses. 
3
Particle_Rain1199 Mar 28, 2026 +3
"Very costly?!?" It will be disastrous for the thousands of kids who get killed and maimed! Again!!
3
morbihann Mar 28, 2026 +3
As long as the not retired generals sit back and keep their mouths shut, there will be no change. Everyone is afraid to say the orange emperor has no clothes.
3
crazybones Mar 28, 2026 +3
It's also hard to see how someone who was too much of a coward to fight for his own country when he was younger, now has the nerve to be considering risking thousands of soldiers lives in a war that is unwinnable.
3
reallybigfatsquirrel Mar 28, 2026 +3
we have a ready front line of Ice ready to be deployed. They even have the budget to send every last Ice officer to Iran
3
Aggressive_Piece919 Mar 28, 2026 +2
War for thee not for me 🎻 
2
PartyClient3447 Mar 28, 2026 +2
I’m a retired nobody and I could have told you that.
2
Toadfinger Mar 28, 2026 +1
They wouldn't be able to accomplish anything. Much less get into a nuclear bunker. Trump needs a long war. That's all that's going on here.
1
1877KlownsForKids Mar 28, 2026 +1
Anyone giving even a cursory glance at a topographical map of Iran could see that.
1
Phronias Mar 28, 2026 +1
If l was an American soldier setting foot in Iran it would be foolish of me not to be shit scared.
1
JustAtelephonePole Mar 28, 2026 +2
Every vet I know that has been to the desert gulf, who isn’t brainwashed into MAGA, is pulling their hair out and panick-yelling about it. Because we know it’s true. So, duh 🤷‍♂️
2
morbob Mar 28, 2026 +2
Keep our troops safe, don’t put them in absolute danger.
2
VagabondReligion Mar 28, 2026 +1
There's no 'could' about it.
1
Diligent-Engineer428 Mar 28, 2026 +2
What do the Republicans care?  It's not their sons, daughters or their grandkids that will have their "boots on the ground"
2
ltmikepowell Mar 29, 2026 +1
No shit, Sherlock! I hated it when the media are saying these obvious thing.
1
kingcakeaholic Mar 29, 2026 +2
Trump lit the fuse on a situation that could bring down the US Empire unless the military takes the cost of Iran for decades. This is stupid AF.
2
fuck-nazi Mar 29, 2026
Maybe i’ll be able to re-up for another 100k bonus for a year in the box again
0
BaseConnect1420 Mar 29, 2026 +1
Absolutely. I just read on another sublistnook, US and Israel troops were hiding on Bubiyan Island (off Kuwait) when Iran struck, multiple vessels sunk and approximately 100 casualties.
1
ZookeepergameWorth71 Mar 29, 2026 +1
The exact number of IDF that helped in the Iraq invasion will now help in Iran invasion. Which is great, lesser Israel takes the casualties while Greater Israel takes land and expands it borders. Its a win win for Greater Israel, not so much for lesser Israel tho.
1
← Back to Board