The conclusion of the talks will depend heavily on whether the negotiators from US have bought puts or calls.
577
mackey881 day ago
+103
Man, I wish I had inside info on this.
103
wastingvaluelesstime1 day ago
+93
Standard financial advice is that ordinary people should not make significant trades in the market on the basis of what is in the newspapers, especially not crises or wars. Any info you get is late and wrong, ; the only way to hold your own against insider trading is to do nothing at all.
The people that make money on it are committing crimes, getting a tip 5 minutes before some major event, and trading on it directly.
93
mackey881 day ago
+33
But in the US while insider trading might still be illegal, they don’t prosecute it. Although if the poor start doing it maybe they would make an example out of the poor.
33
alexefi1 day ago
+19
I think being poor and having enough info to do insider trading are mutually exclusive groups. Vien diagram is 2 circles.
19
Shafter1111 day ago
+2
They will if it becomes too big or unusual. But right, usually not.
2
Shambler90191 day ago
+8
They will if it becomes too big or unusual *and the insider traders aren't affiliated with the government*.
8
wastingvaluelesstime1 day ago
+1
yes they do. Perhaps some would like prosecutions to be more numerous, but they happen regularly; you can google these if you like, e.g.
[https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/four-individuals-convicted-insider-trading-scheme](https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/four-individuals-convicted-insider-trading-scheme)
1
Razaman561 day ago
+1
See: GameStop saga
1
tdw211 day ago
Betting is not trading. So that is still legal i guess.
0
Betrayus1 day ago
+29
Nah you should see the pros over on wallstreet bets. The market is actually really easy. Just make a super heavily option bet on a specific event happening, it either hits or it doesnt, 50/50 shot at being set for life. Follow me for more advice
29
durz471 day ago
+3
You either make millions that you will lose later on, or you go penniless and take up residence behind a Wendy’s dumpster
3
Betrayus1 day ago
+1
> take up residence behind a Wendy’s dumpster
Live and work in the same area? Whats not to love
1
Laugh921 day ago
+5
Yes. We should all totally listen and follow a guy called Betray Us. That will end well.
5
wastingvaluelesstime1 day ago
+1
lol yeah I think wall street bets is run by a handful of stock manipulators trying (with some success so far) in using first amendment protections and the special dispensations of social media law to shield their violations of securities laws. The one directing the herd would thus be the one making the money, not anyone reading listnook.
1
Roxalon_Prime1 day ago
+1
Listening to someone in WallStreetBets - it's one of the most reliable way of going bankrupt
1
GabeIsGone1 day ago
+4
These platforms like Polymarket are COMPLETELY unregulated.
There is no such thing as insider trading on that platform.
4
outoftownMD1 day ago
+3
Your accurate logic isn’t welcome here! We want to live in hopium!
3
Sw0rDz1 day ago
+2
I wish you did too!
2
mackey881 day ago
+1
I would totally share my inside info with you
1
ugotmedripping1 day ago
+1
Watch polymarket closely
1
Original_Astronaut_41 day ago
+1
Me too, notably I’d really like to know, why not include Marco Rubio on this?
1
SweetAndSourShmegma1 day ago
+5
Don't forget prediction markets.
5
LazyProphet1 day ago
+2
I’m certainly glad I closed out my put credit spread positions on friday .
2
d1rtball1 day ago
+1
It’s puts for this weekend. Longs next weekend/Tuesday deadline.
1
Gandhehehe1 day ago
+1
I thought it would depend on who wears suits?
1
Kru1zer1 day ago
+1
Puts most definitely puts. They can't accept those ten points.
1
Visual_Collar_88931 day ago
+1
And how much the US military feels they’re in position.
1
Comfortable-Rule-4911 day ago
+89
These two have been ‘almost agreeing’ longer than most marriages last
89
leisurechef1 day ago
+10
The longer the talks go for the longer the Strait of Hormuz is closed
10
EuropaWeGo1 day ago
+2
Which is a terrifying thought because it'll take 6+ weeks for things to stabilize after the strait is fully open again and who knows how long that'll be.
The European aviation agency has already stated that things are going to get real bad in 3 weeks if things aren't fully resolved by then.
2
leisurechef1 day ago
+2
There’s enough baked in we’ll be feeling this for months
2
SnooCauliflowers32351 day ago
+2
*years. similar to covid
2
csfshrink1 day ago
+80
Iran should let JD Vance negotiate an end to the conflict then Iran should lobby very hard for JD Vance to receive the Nobel Peace Prize. L
80
[deleted]1 day ago
+118
[deleted]
118
hoppertn1 day ago
+22
Perhaps Trump can lend him a copy of “Art of the Deal” before Sunday?
22
mackey881 day ago
+27
He is desperate for peace and will probably accept anything. Willing to proceed to negotiate even though the strait isn’t open, which was basically the only thing Trump said was require for the cease-fire: “subject to the Islamic Republic of Iran agreeing to the COMPLETE, IMMEDIATE, and SAFE OPENING of the Strait of Hormuz”
The US looks weak and will likely go home with their tail between their legs.
27
EuropaWeGo1 day ago
+6
I don't think Vances ego will let him. I mean look at how he's treated other foreign diplomats. Such as with Zelensky.
Vance is a selfish POS and those kind of folks don't compromise easily.
6
Camtastrophe1 day ago
+7
Iran probably doesn't mind Israel ignored the ceasefire in Lebanon (giving the Iranians some credence here as mediator Pakistan also said Lebanon was included), as it gives them an excuse to keep the strait closed during negotiations and the pressure up on Trump.
7
hikingidaho1 day ago
Honestly I'm not sure if it was or wasn't. My personal theory is Pakistan didn't include it to the US. And did include it to Iran. Just to get the talks going. I also can't trust Pakistan when it comes to isreal or India for that matter because they will 100 percent lie through their teeth to try and make them look worse.
0
Alive_Internet1 day ago
+5
The US made a mistake by prolonging the conflict for so long. If they left right after taking out Khamenei, they would have emerged as the undisputed w*****, and would have sent a strong message to the rest of the world.
5
Daily_Heroin_User1 day ago
+8
What would that have accomplished? Iran would have kept a tight grip on the strait with nothing pressuring them to open it up, certainly not to the west.
Once the attack happened the strait issue was never going to be the same and that’s the entire sticking point right now. Iran is going to insist on controlling and tolling the strait now which means we’ll have permanently higher energy prices than we did before the war.
8
TheUnobservered1 day ago
+1
Not permanently. It’ll depend on if pipelines are built, Venezuela finally gets its oil exported, and renewables/nuclear energy are built. That’ll affect oil prices.
1
Daily_Heroin_User1 day ago
+2
Sure but that’s a really long timeframe, and the Venezuela affect is negligible. The point is energy prices are going to be higher indefinitely relative to what they would otherwise have been.
2
BoppityBop21 day ago
+2
Venezuela infrastructure can be fixed in a short amount of time and that is the big sticking point
2
BoppityBop21 day ago
+1
The issue is the Republican media is going all out on him if he tries to make a deal. Look at Lindsey Graham already trying to get Congress involved if the maximalist demands are not met
1
socialistrob1 day ago
+3
If there is a deal it will come at the very end of the talks. It took two years to negotiate the Iran Nuclear deal and they have a little under two weeks to negotiate this deal. I just don't see anyway the deal is negotiated in a day or two.
3
EuropaWeGo1 day ago
+1
It's like seeing two playground bullies duking it out. Neither party is going to be amicable enough to find some sort of middle ground.
1
MrFunktasticc1 day ago
+17
Genuinely curious of Trump ordered Vance there with the assignment to get some unbelievable deal or to just torpedo the whole thing. End result is the same but I'm curious if he will privately blame him for the outcome. Ah, who am I kidding? Ofcourse he will blame him. Basically the setup and result is the same i just want to know what the motivations were.
17
elevatiion4201 day ago
+10
Pretty sure the Iranian hate trump with a passion and requested vance
10
wizard_mitch1 day ago
+13
The Iranians probably didn't want the room to smell like shit
13
MrFunktasticc1 day ago
+1
Sure but he still gave that puppet his marching orders. IMO the Iranians were smart enough to request Vance as a way to play him off Rubio.
1
Yamfish1 day ago
+63
The power of blocking the straight is going to increase as time goes on. The last round of ships leaving the gulf from before the war started should be arriving at their destinations soon. Spring planting in the northern hemisphere is going to make fertilizer a problem. Helium shortages are gonna start hitting the big tech stocks more and more.
I don’t see a deal getting done
63
ruskyandrei1 day ago
+26
Yeah I don't see it either.
Trump already positioning himself do just do a 180 and walk away by claiming victory no matter what and saying they don't care about a deal anyway.
Guess oil prices at 100+ a barrel is the new normal and we're a few months away from 10% inflation worldwide.
Had just recovered from the COVID/Russia war shock too, sigh.
26
ByteSizedGenius1 day ago
+3
Yeah, if they open the strait for a couple of weeks all of a sudden they release the pressure and need to close it again for a few weeks to be applying the same again. You'd have to be pretty dumb if you're Iran to do it.
3
TheUnobservered1 day ago
+4
IMO the power of the strait actually grows weaker with time. Tolling is *extremely* powerful right now, but trade routes change and allies/neighbors get annoyed. It’s a power best kept as a boogy man, but not actualized.
4
Yamfish1 day ago
+5
I respectfully disagree, but it’s such an unprecedented situation that we’ll have to wait and see.
I don’t see how an alternative path moving product out of the gulf could be achieved in a timely enough fashion (I’m thinking multiple massive trunk lines built across the Arabian peninsula, in addition to rail lines for products like fertilizer, and the need to construct new ports in the Red Sea) to avoid the incoming price shocks.
A military intervention that would stop Iran from striking ships passing through the strait would involve a nightmarish campaign of locating and clearing the massive network of caves and tunnels Iran has been building for decades for exactly this outcome. I don’t think we have a clear picture of what their drone and missile stockpiles are like but I’d be absolutely stunned if they don’t have enough, spread out far enough to make insuring tankers unthinkable. You’d essentially have to guarantee they’ve all been disabled before the flow returns to close to normal.
Trump may be stuck choosing between the greatest strategic defeat in modern history, and trying to prosecute a horrifying war amidst historic energy and food prices.
Or maybe I’m completely wrong. Here’s hoping.
I’m pretty ignorant of military stuff but an admittedly long time ago I studied petroleum marketing and regulatory frameworks. My dad was a petroleum geologist. My sister is a O+G accountant, her husband is a gas plant engineer. My best friend was a petroleum marketer before getting his JD and now does contract stuff for a sizeable upstream producer, so I’ve got some sources of information on the energy side at least.
5
TheUnobservered1 day ago
+1
I believe this type of issue is actually more common in history than you may think. Personally, I’m just banking on the higher oil prices encouraging greater usage and investment into alternative energy sources (renewable and nuclear).
Am I being a bit optimistic? Maybe, but the market tries its best to follow the path of maximum profit.
1
Yamfish1 day ago
+3
Eh, I'm pretty well informed about supply chain disruptions, especially regarding oil and gas. I say unprecedented because I think the US is in a markedly worse position than 1973, 1979, or even Covid.
Take the stock market for example. Remove the Magnificent 7 from the indexes and it's not doing nearly as well as they'd like us to believe. Qatar produces \~30% of the worlds helium, which is essential for semiconductor production. The last shipments of helium that passed through the strait before the war haven't reached terminals in the Asia Pacific yet, so the impact has only really been speculative so far. If Nvidia is forced to balk on their commitments for semiconductors to the other big players (not to mention OpenAI, Anthropic, etc). we could see a cascading effect on overall investment that would really exacerbate the disruption on the energy market.
Similarly, the fertilizer market hasn't fully realized the impacts either. I would expect massive pressure from the agricultural sector in the coming weeks that will further disrupt political stability in the US.
All of this is happening with the background of very high consumer price sensitivity, and the US alienating itself from economic and military allies by the imposition of tariffs and... general stupidity.
I love the idea of this spurring greater investment in renewables and alternative energy sources, but I simply don't see Trump surviving long enough politically for that to be a factor. He can't make it through a summer of $8/g gasoline in the present climate. He will need to try and find a way out before then and none of the offramps are good.
3
TheUnobservered1 day ago
+1
Fully agree with your assessment.
Just to clarify on the history part, I think you’re absolutely right that in recent history (post 1800’s) with the fairly new and convoluted supply chains, it’s absolutely new. I just personally think back to the Conquest of Constantinople by the Ottomans and the collapse of the Mongol Silk Road from plague. Both caused massive disruptions to trade, but spurred on innovation.
Edit: don’t have time rn to fully comprehend your analysis, so I may respond better later lol. I love talking with people like you!
1
not_old_redditor1 day ago
+1
What alternate routes are there that currently exist?
1
TheUnobservered22 hr ago
+1
The Hormuz to Redsea pipeline. Unfortunately it can only move 7 million barrels a day (if I remember correctly). Additionally, consumer habits will slowly shift to more cost effective choices like electric vehicles over gasoline. Not because it’s environmentally friendly but because it’s more economical.
1
ErikChnmmr1 day ago
+2
Sulphur is the catastrophic one. Means no sulphuric acid to create fertiliser, means food yields drop 30-50%!!!!!!!! Thats global famine levels.
2
wastingvaluelesstime1 day ago
+1
Frankly, if Iran's stance does not change, it's in the US for Iran to be destroyed, rather than see them collect on those tolls and be able to spend the money on new weapons undisturbed. An oil shock an forced rush program to use alternate energy is preferable to Iran monopolizing the economic power of the entire middle east and using it to aim ICBMs at us.
At this rate, probably we'll get something in the middle though, something which maximizes the benefit for Russia - oil shock, high oil prices, damage to US allies especially in Europe and East Asian, and \*also\* Iran escapes destruction, collects tolls and builds ICBMs aimed at us.
1
Ultra_Metal1 day ago
-8
There won't be "as time goes on". The strait will be unblocked by force soon if the negotiations fail.
-8
TriXter691 day ago
+14
Doubt a deal will be made
14
lizardan1 day ago
+7
Why would anything change Sunday ?
7
redditobserverone1 day ago
+17
24 hours before the opening bell. The movement of the market is the guiding principle of this White House.
When does the Melania story drop? That is their other pressure point.
17
Royal-Hunter38921 day ago
+6
So what happens next if there is no outcome or a deal from this talks , this status quo will continue ? no war no peace kind of situation?
6
milagro0301 day ago
+13
There isn’t going to be any deal
13
mdevi941 day ago
+15
Why is the vice president leading peace talks? It’s bizarre
15
bakkarj1 day ago
+29
Iran asked for him to do it as he has an anti-war reputation.
29
dwilkes8271 day ago
+15
Iran wanted him. For all his faults, and he has a shitload of them, I genuinely think he was against this and wants it to end
15
DecembersDragons1 day ago
+8
Iran requested he lead them. No idea why.
8
Anustart151 day ago
+19
Because he's been trying to carefully position himself so he can say he was against the war when he runs for president in 28. He's their best chance at seeing what the most favorable deal they would be and to strike is.
19
Prize_Proof53321 day ago
+11
Although I despise his politics and character he's one of the more competent members of the administration.
11
Guilty-Top-71 day ago
+10
He’s a retired Marine who was deployed to Iraq in 2005. Did a 6 month tour. He probably has a basic understanding how bad wars are.
10
BAHatesToFly1 day ago
+14
He's also a bought-and-paid for shill for Palantir and was just campaigning for a horrible government in Hungary. He has absolutely no scruples or morals. He was a "Never Trump"-er who said Trump might be "America's Hitler" until a few years later when he completely flipped and is now his VP. He'll do whatever his corporate donors tell him to.
14
not_old_redditor1 day ago
+2
What does that matter? He's going to kiss trump's ass so hard cause he's next in line and he's not going to throw away his career for some war in some middle eastern county
2
ChaoticSenior1 day ago
+10
Wow. Guy who wrote fiction book and worked for Peter Theil is the competent one. Scary.
10
wizard_of_gram1 day ago
+13
I mean, you don't have to like him but he did graduate from Yale law. He's not dumb.
13
ChaoticSenior1 day ago
+1
Graduating from Yale, or Princeton, or Harvard, is no guarantee of intelligence. I give you George W. Bush.
1
asetniop1 day ago
+3
I see your GWB and raise you Jared Kushner.
3
Shoddy-Fan-5841 day ago
+2
Hegseth graduated from both Princeton and Harvard and he is a complete and utter incompetent fool who’s more desperate to be on daddy Trump’s good side and to look cool to 20 year old corporals than he is to actually run a halfway competent DoD and wartime strategy.
2
not_old_redditor1 day ago
+1
Trump has an ivy league economics degree lol. All kinds of idiots come out of prestigious universities. These places don't enroll *only* the best and brightest.
1
HiddenbyMoon1 day ago
+1
JD Vance is, and always has been, an absolute and utter f****** moron of the highest order.
1
5HITCOMBO1 day ago
-1
Yes he is, come the f*** on
-1
phatpham18031 day ago
-3
At least he's the VP who are you haha 😄
-3
richarm871 day ago
+2
Kushner and witcoff lead the last 2 and they had an agreement in principle last time and got bombed that night.
They dont trust those two at all. So they requested Vance
2
008Zulu1 day ago
I suspect that Trump is physically unable to travel anymore.
0
Anustart151 day ago
+13
He travels back and forth to Florida every weekend
13
MsBlackSox1 day ago
+1
Trump refuses to give up a golfing weekend
1
Villag3Idiot1 day ago
+6
Next time have the agreement in writing on paper with a copies so everyone can agree on the details.
Oh who am I kidding, we know they'll just use god damn Twitter.
6
Pure_Golden1 day ago
+3
At some point the administration would've sat down and said "shit"
3
Shwalz1 day ago
+3
And Spain is moving onto trade deals with China
3
Cool-Association34201 day ago
+3
I can’t imagine some real estate developers and a ding dong negotiating peace, we live in the dumbest times
3
roarjah1 day ago
+3
Time is on irans side. It makes Trump lose his mind and his support. This will drag on and especially so with that POS Netanyahu
3
Entire_Month92331 day ago
+3
Tomorrow night they will Claim that a tentative ceasefire agreement has been negotiated pending something. To manipulate the Stock Market again Monday.
3
Boys4Ever1 day ago
+2
Sole purpose of this negotiation was to make Vance look incompetent and Trump will declare he's young and inexperienced and he would have gotten the deal done. Because either way we win.
2
Minimum_Run_8901 day ago
+2
Hard to continue tomorrow when the Americans have waddled on home
2
BluehibiscusEmpire1 day ago
+2
That was a quick end. They probably will spend more time on the flight than actually discussing.
2
of-skallitz1 day ago
+2
oh some people thought dj was going to actually get something accomplished?
this was always going to be the outcome.
2
FeelingKind76441 day ago
+2
Another fail for the epstein regime.
2
I_can_vouch_for_that1 day ago
+2
" Peace Summit " when the US and Israel started all the bombings.
2
Relative_Drop32161 day ago
+1
After brunch
1
hotdog311 day ago
+1
So,,, now everyone is instructed to blame Vance.
He’s a f****** moron but is set to take the fall
1
New-Equal80391 day ago
+1
This will take months, not days.
1
brokeboipobre1 day ago
+1
Wow I’m so surprised. 😒
1
Chimaera10751 day ago
+1
I’m shocked!!
But, on a more realistic side, these are complicated negotiations and I wouldn’t expect that it would be settled in 1 day. Maybe in a week or 2 they’ll come to some consensus.
1
itec7451 day ago
+1
Fireworks aka missles and bombs are in the near forecast for this region . 🤦♀️
1
WretchedBlowhard1 day ago
+1
Trump tears up treaties faster than he reaches for his daughter's panty line in public on camera as soon as she comes close enough. You need to be a special kind of stupid to negotiate anything with his government.
1
cleanuponaisle41 day ago
+1
I wonder if it had something to do with Dementia Donald backing out of his promise to use Iran's 10 point plan as a basis for negotiation, and instead pretending that that never happened. Add to that, Trump has the memory of a goldfish because his brain has turned to pudding.
1
Windycityunicycle1 day ago
+1
So a hillbilly and two real estate developers walk into a bar…
1
Sidfire1 day ago
+1
What happens next ?
1
Windycityunicycle23 hr ago
+1
We shall see, the joke is still playing out,
1
BeerMagic19 hr ago
+1
As was always going to happen. You don't go from murdering an entire school worth of schoolgirls to peace talks in 5 weeks.
1
[deleted]1 day ago
+2
[deleted]
2
SureWouldForest1 day ago
+8
I read somewhere Iran requested him, due to the rumor that in the Trump administration he was the lone dissenting voice regarding the attack.
8
WheatKing911 day ago
+5
That's right. They've been requesting him since that last group of Iranian negotiators were all killed.
5
HarEr891 day ago
+1
Yes, Vance is such an a******.
1
exMemberofSTARS1 day ago
+1
The US has zero leverage in the talks and Iran knows this. Trump has been begging for a ceasefire to try to save face but he can’t TACO this time, he’s fucked it up too much to undo. Now it’s going to cost us (Americans) as well as the rest of the world by improving Irans resources and position in the world as well as showing the United States will bow to random demands.
1
526mb1 day ago
+1
Honestly my most to least likely outcomes:
1. Deal that heavily favors the Iranians with them administering the straits in partnership with a gulf nation. The part of tolls from the gulf nation will be partially laundered through cryptocurrency to the Trump family.
2. The ceasefire is “extended” for two more weeks, on and on and on again. Iranians have defacto control of the strait and Trump gets bored and pretends he “crushed” the Iranians. Countries just get used to this and a new structure builds around the current status quo.
3. Hostilities resume with an Iran rearmed with drones ready to hit oil infrastructure in the gulf. The US attempts a very very stupid landings a Kharg Island that get a bunch of soldiers killed.
….
99. Godzilla rises from the straits.
100. A fair compromise is reached in which US strategic goals are met, and can reasonably claim victory in the war.
1
Fit-Significance-4361 day ago
+1
So if Kushner and Witkoff are there, do they lead with real estate development negotiations?
1
Shoddy-Fan-5841 day ago
+1
They’re there to represent Israel in the supposed “two-way” negotiations.
Anytime Vance and the Iranians are making any sort of headways their job is into interject and say “Well actually have you considered Israel’s demands in all this?” And thereby ensuring no progress is ever made. They’ll be getting a big pat on the back from Bibi for a job well done.
1
LiveintheArt1 day ago
-2
No deal unless the regime goes.
-2
mohawk_671 day ago
+15
Both regimes should go.
15
Althusser_Was_Right1 day ago
+9
BiBi should go as well. Get rid of the whole lot.
9
LiveintheArt1 day ago
+2
Not sure why I'm getting downvoted?? Why are there so many IRGC sympathizers on Listnook ffs! I'm American Iranian and have family there...
2
mohawk_671 day ago
+5
I don't think its IRGC sympathy. People focus on Trump and Bibi as they are the focus of the western news.Many people do not pay attention to how bad the Iranian regime is.
Yes, Trump is bad, Bibi is worse, however the Iranian regime tops both of them as they have killed many of their own people in cold blood, not to mention the multiple other human rights violations.
I would love it if there was a regime change in Iran, but not through a war. Ive never been, but Iran i's a beautiful historic country with amazing people and it should be thriving. I would visit in a heartbeat if it was not dangerous.
5
LiveintheArt1 day ago
+2
Yes, Iran is worse. Unfortunately, the regime is heavily embedded across all industries, so without military and economic pressure the regime will stay in tact. Iranians are unarmed.
2
Ultra_Metal1 day ago
-2
This is why:
[The Terrorist Propaganda to Listnook Pipeline](https://www.piratewires.com/p/the-terrorist-propaganda-to-listnook-pipeline)
-2
Ultra_Metal1 day ago
+1
Trump will leave in 3 years. The US is a democracy.
1
fadvex1 day ago
+11
Yep, no deal until the pedo trump regime goes.
11
LiveintheArt1 day ago
+6
The Iranian Regime first, they shot at thousands of protesters and imprisoned 20k more, some of which have already been executed or hanged. So yes, while it would be nice for MAGA to melt away - IRGC is recruiting 12 year old soldiers so the biggest evil is Iran
6
ChaoticSenior1 day ago
+6
Trump is an existential threat. Iran is a local threat. Huge difference.
6
LiveintheArt1 day ago
+8
You're going to minimize the horrific atrocities of the IRGC because you hate Trump? WTF 😒 Iran has been destabilizing the Middle East and funding terrorist groups.
8
ChaoticSenior1 day ago
+8
Yes they are horrible. Didn’t say they weren’t. But Trump controls the largest military and nuclear arsenal on the planet. Do the math.
8
LiveintheArt1 day ago
+4
So you're saying Trump is worse than IRGC because he may push for nukes? Then Putin must be an existential threat, too and Pakistan as well.
4
HarEr891 day ago
+5
Putin is a bigger threat, at least for Europe. And Trump makes Putin even more dangerous because it's likely that he wouldn't defend Europe in a Russian attack. The IRGC are terrible people. They killed so many civilians in January. They execute people every day. They support Hamas, Hezbollah, Houthis etc. They gave Russia the drones to attack Ukraine so it's good that their arms factories were destroyed.
5
LiveintheArt1 day ago
+1
Agreed 💯
1
HarEr891 day ago
+3
I'm with you. Down with the criminal Iranian regime. And down with criminal Donald TACO Trump.
3
azaparky92281 day ago
US: we know you don't have nukes but we need all of your oil. Please.
142 Comments