· 91 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 10, 2026 at 4:55 AM

USPS to suspend pension contributions, seeks 4-cent stamp price hike.

Posted by Fantastic-Device-487


USPS is set to suspend pension contributions, seeks 4-cent stamp price hike
AP News
USPS is set to suspend pension contributions, seeks 4-cent stamp price hike
The U.S. Postal Service has decided to temporarily suspend its contributions to Federal Employees Retirement System annuities.

🚩 Report this post

91 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
New_Housing785 1 day ago +417
Amazing how the postal service seems to have money issues just before elections where mail in voting happens.
417
velveteentuzhi 1 day ago +132
All by design. The GOP financially crippled the USPS in 2006, they've just managed to crawl along until now
132
Shoot_from_the_Quip 1 day ago +22
And the USPS funds like 90% of its 80 billion budget through first class mail and parcels. We could fund the USPS shortcoming with just a few days of this war's expenditures.
22
aircooledJenkins 1 day ago -26
That was repealed in 2022. People don't use the post office like they used to.
-26
Fresh_Individual5500 1 day ago +1
That’s the place that gives out free cardboard boxes isn’t it?
1
Serial-Griller 1 day ago +12
Just. Like. Last. Time. 
12
Magic_Neil 1 day ago +759
What I’m reading is that everything is going according to the plan of a certain group of people.
759
iatekane 1 day ago +195
Seems more like a project than a plan, I would think
195
asusc 1 day ago +55
couldn’t be that famous project the president swore he knew nothing about, could it?
55
yamirzmmdx 1 day ago +31
Nah. It's 2026 now. Clearly it's past the 2025 deadline.
31
terry496 1 day ago +3
I've got slightly over two thousand reasons to agree with you
3
crimson_teacup 1 day ago +16
Yup, the old “make it fail, then say it failed” playbook. Starve a public service, jack prices, then yell “privatize.” At minimum, people should be bugging their reps relentlessly about USPS.
16
Dematrus 1 day ago +4
The word 'people' is doing a lot of heavy lifting here. I prefer 'scum'.
4
East_Oven_9948 1 day ago +8
Don't tell them that or else you're somehow the bad guy
8
wkaotp 1 day ago +239
Why does everything need to be for profit? It should be a service for the people.
239
Creative_Parsnip_385 1 day ago +98
Cuz that would be #socialism
98
LBChango 1 day ago +35
We should go full capitalism. Sell public roads to any billionaire that wants them. Let them charge people to drive on them. Privatized police and military brought to you by Amazon and Meta. Fire fighters by way of subscriptions. Everything for sale to those that can afford it. 
35
CallRespiratory 1 day ago +54
'Hell yeah brother" - guy who makes $10/hr working at a gas station in rural Alabama
54
WierdFinger 1 day ago +7
Man, I need to learn sarcasm like this. I always have to tell people that I am being sarcastic, like now... Go frell yourself. :)
7
laplongejr 1 day ago +5
> Sell public roads to any billionaire that wants them. Let them charge people to drive on them. They wouldn't want to pay for maintenance. For now THEY use the roads *for free*.
5
LBChango 1 day ago +4
You need to pay a higher tier if you want consistent maintenance. Duh.
4
A_Queer_Owl 1 day ago +14
I work for a government run healthcare facility, we're required to make a profit, however we are also required to accept payment only through Medicare and Medicaid. so like what the f***.
14
LittleBirdiesCards 1 day ago +2
You are my kids' option for healthcare and dental. How do I make it work for my kids?
2
Deep90 1 day ago +9
Someone wants it to fail so they can buy it for pennies.
9
CallRespiratory 1 day ago +8
>Why does everything need to be for profit? Because this is America. F*** you, pay me.
8
TessaThompsonBurger 1 day ago +7
It's f****** stupid. The country is literally a union. Of states, yes but of people. It isn't a business we're investing in to turn a profit, its a f****** people's union we pay dues into for service.
7
Magic_Neil 1 day ago +10
It always has been, that’s why postal rates for letters and some parcels are so much lower than FedEx/UPS.
10
I_am_not_JohnLeClair 1 day ago +5
It still is. Don’t let them fool you. USPS delivers to every single address in the good ol’ U S and A. For profit entities do not
5
JoeSavinaBotero 1 day ago +8
USPS will even do last-mile deliveries for the other guys who don't want to drive out to the farm house to deliver a packet.
8
I_am_not_JohnLeClair 1 day ago +6
“Cash-strapped” usps *literally* works for Jeff Bezos on Sundays. maga willful ignorance knows no bounds
6
LowerRhubarb 1 day ago +2
Because Republicans believe anything to the left of hunting homeless and "lesser" people in the street is socialism. Except giving billionaires free money on the taxpayer dime, that's just what Jesus would do.
2
ShelfDiver 1 day ago +1
Why not frame the fire department, cops, and roads the same way? F*** the media and the POS GOP.
1
Worf1701D 1 day ago
Doing something for the good of society is not what the current American emperor wants. He is determined to create a new GALATIC EMPIRE…..or something like that.
0
MentokGL 1 day ago +84
Can't vote by mail if there's no mail
84
Fantastic-Device-487 1 day ago +18
More expensive to drive to the polling location and more expensive to mail in your ballot. It's a win-win! /s
18
filanwizard 1 day ago +59
A thing to remember is the payment structure into the pension fund that Congress forced the USPS into was specifically designed to fail. they have something where they have to make whole payments all at once or something while the private sector and even full government agencies pay in over time.
59
Ndtphoto 1 day ago +24
Yeah that was a Republican initiative I think back in the Bush II days. Looking at politics now it's not even close to the most ridiculous things that are passed but it's still a 9 on the ridiculousness scale. Edit to add a link : https://ips-dc.org/how-congress-manufactured-a-postal-crisis-and-how-to-fix-it/ Can't believe that was 20 years ago
24
muftak3 1 day ago +10
They were mandated to pay for retirees 75 years in advance within 10 years. Why they were bleeding money. It was repealed in 2022. I'm not sure where the $5B in savings from the repeal is going.
10
brahbocop 1 day ago +2
I imagine it takes a long time for a business to recover from the shit it had to go through for almost 20 years.
2
Jaschndlr 1 day ago +1
Isn't stopping pension contributions just them saying they're got going to comply with that anymore, or am I misunderstanding?
1
BadDecisionPolice 1 day ago +15
I’m sure this has absolutely nothing to do with upcoming elections.
15
barfly2780 1 day ago +56
Raise taxes on the top 10% of the country. That’ll pay for it.
56
DonnerPartyPicnic 1 day ago +21
Close loopholes that the top 10% use to dodge taxes*
21
PandaJesus 1 day ago +1
***Do both***
1
GovernorHarryLogan 1 day ago +6
The vast majority of the top 10% of earners in this country own their own businesses and essentially pay 0 federal income tax as it is through various deductions reducing their "income" to essentially 0. About half of US households pay 0 in income tax actually. It isnt about raising their taxes. That would still equate to 0. It is about reforming the tax code as a whole to ensure they, and really everyone, can not reduce their burden to 0 and pay their fair share.
6
Easy_Bite6858 1 day ago +2
I really try to avoid the terminology "paying their fair share" because it invites endless semantic dissection of what fairness means in context. Right idea but wrong execution. Instead, we should approach it with economic and mathematical modeling with the express purpose of checking the negative externalities of wealth inequality while still fostering growth (which are naturally in conflict). Similar to how a speed limit is intended to optimize between safety and flow of traffic. Taxes represent a non-market way to check against the economic (and therefore political) weight of accrued capital and wealth inequality. Taxes are about social protection and defense.
2
4RCH43ON 1 day ago +10
The postal service is essentially a solvent business that gets looted by the government to keep undermining it.
10
brahbocop 1 day ago +1
Finally, a commenter that f****** gets it!
1
Throwawayconcern2023 1 day ago +64
I seek a 40% drop in executive pay first.
64
mishap1 1 day ago +42
Postmaster general gets like $300k/yr + performance bonuses. Not quite what UPS and FedEx paid their CEOs at $24M and $13M last year. Dejoy used to make over $1M/yr as CEO of XPO. Makes you think he's in it for other things beyond that salary.
42
tidal_flux 1 day ago +18
The current Postmaster General was on the board of directors at FedEx. What a strange coincidence… https://about.usps.com/who/leadership/officers/pmg-ceo.htm
18
HimTiser 1 day ago +10
I wonder how much money they make from all the presorted junk mail I get? 10% of the mail I get is legitimate.
10
Weorth 1 day ago +5
You can refuse that junk mail, just gotta let the post office know you don't want it. Used to sort stuff and they told me you basically ask not to have it given to you and they don't put it in your stack when casing.
5
HimTiser 1 day ago +1
Definitely worth a shot! Thanks
1
Fantastic-Device-487 1 day ago +1
Electronic banking and electronic transactions put a huge dent in USPS's daily delivery volume. A couple of clicks here and there don't cost anything.
1
Xbox_Lost 1 day ago +5
Here's 80 cents, will you drive this letter across the country for me? You want a dollar? Screw you! I'll do it myself.
5
thereverendpuck 1 day ago +3
If USPS wanted to save money just suspend deliveries on Saturdays until around the holidays. The increase in postage? Not a big fan but we’ll get by.
3
TrainingSword 1 day ago +6
So much for forever stamps
6
Martin_Aurelius 1 day ago +10
Before "forever" stamps you had to buy smaller stamps to make up the difference whenever they raised the cost of stamps. When stamps went from 33¢ to 34¢ you had to buy a bunch of 1¢ stamps to make up the difference. Now with forever stamp you can still use your stamp you bought for 50¢ back in 2018 without any additional cost, even though current postage is 78¢.
10
Fantastic-Device-487 1 day ago +7
Forever going up in price.
7
Fantastic-Device-487 1 day ago +2
Could be worse: [https://media.azpm.org/master/image/2024/7/15/element/global-postage-comparison.jpg](https://media.azpm.org/master/image/2024/7/15/element/global-postage-comparison.jpg) *(This chart was compiled in 2024.)*
2
rockerscott 1 day ago +2
Just make postage a whole dollar amount instead of this $0.78 garbage.
2
scenr0 1 day ago +2
Stamps are literally 78 cents right now. The last time I looked it was 61 cents. And now they want to raise it again?! Wtf?!
2
invalidpassword 1 day ago +4
The loss of pensions will make for a senior population often depending 100% on Social Security which doesn't pay a living wage in most cases.
4
steathrazor 1 day ago +1
And they already claim SS will be bankrupt it 10ish years if something isn't done (or so I heard at least)
1
OskaMeijer 1 day ago +1
SS can't go bankrupt by its very nature, all that can happen is payouts will have to drop to be in line with current incoming SS taxes.
1
nutationsf 1 day ago +1
I believe it maybe massively over funded at this point
1
invalidpassword 1 day ago +1
According to whom.
1
marzipan07 1 day ago +4
Ordinarily, when demand drops for a good, you can try to lower the price to try to spur demand, or you can increase the price to gouge the remaining customers which then causes more of them to no longer want the good. Postal service always chooses the second option.
4
Fantastic-Device-487 1 day ago +3
That's just crazy! You're talking sense! This is the USPS we're talking about. Normal economics don't apply.
3
brahbocop 1 day ago +2
You’re right actually! The USPS receives almost no government funding but is basically ran by the government so yes, normal economics don’t apply. Imagine a business that one political party hates and wants to go under, being allowed to make decisions on its behalf to, you know, try to make it go under.
2
Knees0ck 1 day ago +1
This is a precursor the the very convenient closures &/or lessening of services for election season
1
Aerchaiz 1 day ago +1
Running it like a business...
1
Fantastic-Device-487 1 day ago -1
Am I lucky, or do other folks get mail delivered on Sunday?
-1
Ditka85 1 day ago +2
Kenosha WI gets Sunday mail.
2
Fantastic-Device-487 1 day ago +2
If it's overtime, it's pricey.
2
snowflake37wao 1 day ago
make it 8¢ extra for stamps and dont suspend pensions, there are worse things getting funded we wont care. make it 4 and drop pensions and lose our mail and we’ll care in a burn your house down way stop fuckin around
0
Mydreamsource 1 day ago -7
Yet another price hike with no plan to fix their poor service and falling approval ratings.
-7
Fantastic-Device-487 1 day ago +1
They could start by saving gas and payroll by not delivering mail on weekends, **especially on Sunday!**
1
Mydreamsource 1 day ago
Yes, you are most correct. I have mail trucks in my neighborhood 7 days a week. Usually there are two. One for mail and one for packages. Probably only 1 in 10 mail deliveries is actual, useful mail. The rest are ads, or political oversized postcard, basically junk mail that goes straight to recycling.
0
Devayurtz 1 day ago -9
I support both of these. Pensions are a dated concept - that's why like... nothing else has them. It's a ball and chain for the USPS. It will never stand a chance with that craziness.
-9
brahbocop 1 day ago +7
Yeah, no. Pensions should absolutely be a thing still and the USPS’s requirement to pre-fund their pensions was done to try and make them go out of business.
7
Grins111 1 day ago +2
This is the answer. It was done to ruin it to privatize it. It was done under bush in 2006. No other business has that requirement.
2
dazed_delujenelle 1 day ago -57
USPS is literal garbage. If they weren’t constitutionally mandated to provide mail service they’d have been out of business years ago.
-57
oakleez 1 day ago +12
They're perfectly fine, current management excluded. It's not supposed to be a profitable business. It's supposed to be a service provided because we pay taxes. The GOP narrative that it's a bad thing because it "loses money" is utter nonsense.
12
Seeteuf3l 1 day ago +1
Shouldn't it at least break even by law (which it hasn't managed to do) so to cover it's operating costs
1
jaythebearded 1 day ago +20
Well they aren't a business so doesn't really apply 
20
Beznia 1 day ago +7
Yeah seriously... Why do they have to make money? It's a public service. I know why, it's just ridiculous they are used as a political pawn for seemingly no reason.
7
Fracture-Point- 1 day ago +24
Yeah, and the fire department wouldn't exist either if they had to fund themselves. What's your point?
24
dazed_delujenelle 1 day ago -20
At least the fire department doesn’t deliver my mail to the wrong address constantly!
-20
Fracture-Point- 1 day ago +7
Has the post office ever hosed down your neighbor's house when yours was on fire?
7
← Back to Board