Can't decide whether they're using Vance as the sacrificial lamb on talks that will go nowhere, or whether the deal is already there in principle and they use this to elevate his profile ahead of 2028.
108
Different_Height_1572 days ago
+108
I don’t think Trump elevates anyone but himself
108
HFB_To_You2 days ago
+40
I'd be surprised if Trump could tell you what day of the week it is most of the time.
He's not the one orchestrating these plans.
40
DexJedi2 days ago
+11
Rumor has it that Vance was actually against the Iran war. (Him being very quiet about it these last couple of weeks would support it.) Rumor also has it Netanyahu convinced Trump to attack Iran. If those rumors are true it would invalidate your claim.
11
shortsteve2 days ago
+12
Vance has presidential aspirations. He knows how unpopular Trump has become so he needs to find ways to distance himself from Trump while maintaining a public persona as if he still supports him. Even the right wing blogosphere doesn't really believe it.
12
Ted_Striker12 days ago
+6
Vance has as much chance of winning the next election as I do. He sealed his fate in 2024.
6
Salty_Pop_38882 days ago
Then again, Trump did win in 2024 despite everything he had done before that. If Americans can vote for Trump in 2024, I don't see why they cannot for Vance in 2028.
0
Ted_Striker12 days ago
+1
Ugh don't scare me like that lol
1
Ok_Butterscotch48941 day ago
+1
If he wanted to any chance of winning presidency , imho he should’ve revolted against this war. Not keep quiet. His chances of presidency is fucked.
1
Donnicton2 days ago
+5
>Rumor also has it Netanyahu convinced Trump to attack Iran.
Iran has for sure been heavily agitpropping that point recently.
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5G9DNx7xIIc](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5G9DNx7xIIc)
5
DexJedi2 days ago
+3
You mean to imply the rumor was because of Iran's videos?
It could be the other way around just as well.
3
Donnicton2 days ago
+4
No, the rumors have existed for a long time. I'm saying Iran has been capitalizing on Trump's tanking popularity to drill the image of Trump being a dog for Bibi even harder because even among his own base Israel is a party-splitting sticking point.
4
DexJedi2 days ago
+2
Ah I see, understood!
2
HFB_To_You2 days ago
+2
>Rumor also has it Netanyahu convinced Trump to attack Iran.
Ergo....Trump is the one orchestrating plans?
2
Broken_Reality2 days ago
+4
Plans is a strong word for what has been happening. Impulse driven mass murder is better. Trump never had a plan.
4
DexJedi2 days ago
+3
In that sense I would agree. There was no good plan.
But I would not d******* his *involvement*, let's call it that.
3
UpInTheCut2 days ago
+1
Just read the NY Times article about inside scoop how this all came about it's probably the best article of the year so far. [How Trump Took the U.S. to War With Iran - The New York Times https://share.google/ovU47m8WgFvhWdPZz](http://How Trump Took the U.S. to War With Iran - The New York Times https://share.google/ovU47m8WgFvhWdPZz)
1
Only-Cranberry-45022 days ago
+1
Probably rubio?
1
Lonely-Abalone-51042 days ago
+2
Ya no way if this turns out positive that Trump would ever allow someone else to take credit for it
2
poop-money2 days ago
+2
You're mistaken. Trump hasn't been able to elevate himself for years without help from a little blue pill.
2
AlternativeScratch942 days ago
+18
Iran said that they specifically wanted Vance because he's a non-interventionist.
18
Successful-Candy84212 days ago
+14
They know that Kushner and Witkoff want war so they’re probably happy to have anyone other than them
14
keithabarta2 days ago
+14
Iran also knows those two are tweedle dee and tweedle dumb. Even Israeli sources said that Iran offered a good deal before the war and Kushner and Witkoff couldn’t comprehend what was being offered, so they rejected it.
14
DexJedi2 days ago
+8
Not saying you are wrong, but do you have a source for that?
8
Soft_Author25931 day ago
+1
They hope vance could cushion the impact a bit
1
Khshayarshah2 days ago
+1
Witkoff is called "Ayatollah Witkoff" by Iranian dissidents for his efforts to try to appease this regime and every jihadist he sits down with. The fact that the regime couldn't make any progress with a pushover like Witkoff further reveals how delusional they are.
1
Soft_Author25931 day ago
+1
Trump took him in because he bought him sandwiches. Nuff said..m
1
Duchess4302 days ago
+9
Vance was the most "not for" the iran stuff, i think this is a punishment lol
9
zombiekoalas2 days ago
+9
I think this is a scapegoat being setup.
Trump will throw his ass under the bus if this doesnt go well SO fast.
9
deedee21482 days ago
+6
Vance is not Trump. Nobody is. Once Trump dies a good chunk of the faithful will probably never vote again and it terrifies them.
6
Repulsive-Copy-32182 days ago
+3
They want to make sure they say "Thank you"
3
paubrasil_1232 days ago
+3
Vance is who’s going to be around Washington the next few decades, with a political aspiration to be president, and so they have the greatest leverage over him. He knows this will play into his 2028 run - if he agrees something here and wins 28 he has to deal with whatever he agrees to.
The rest are more reckless because they either don’t have the same political ambitions or will hide it until last minute, so not to be viewed in that lens
Edit - I’m speaking in relation to Iran not Trump admin
3
HFB_To_You2 days ago
+2
Yes - Vance is clearly servile, and owned by tech money in addition to whatever foreign influence is at play, hence it would seem more reasonable that they keep him around. On the other hand, he is a bumpkin utterly void of charisma and achievement; can they really build new-MAGA on his foundations? V much doubt it.
2
allbutluk2 days ago
+3
No they are setting Vance up to take over
Midterm is fucked and Vance stayed as far away from iran as possible until now
If he coordinates with Iran well, he can come home as the “hero” who opened the strait and then im sure Trump will have a medical reason to step down before midterm and republicans will magically forget what this administration did for last 2 yrs
3
HFB_To_You2 days ago
+1
Definitely possible.
1
apathetic_revolution2 days ago
+7
I think Trump thinks he’s sending Vance to fail and Vance is going to throw Article 25 on the table and secure the deal with U.S. regime change.
7
oak-heart2 days ago
+7
I’ve been watching this movie for a few hours now, and somehow i don’t think this is how it ends. It’s a nice thought though.
7
aliasesarestupid2 days ago
+5
These are crazy levels of wishful thinking but I'm for it
5
apathetic_revolution2 days ago
+5
Might as well be hopeful if everything's fucked either way, right?
5
rhino3692 days ago
+2
Article 25 is harder than impeachment. You need 2/3rds of both houses of congress plus half the cabinet—whom Trump can fire at will.
It’ll never happen.
2
JB-Wentworth2 days ago
+1
The last two times the US negotiated with Iran, they launched attacks.
1
thisisasetupisntit2 days ago
+2
He thinks he's going to be president that's so funny,maybe the couch will have you back.
2
Ok-Blood43402 days ago
+2
Deal is already there ready for him to sign and this is designed to elevate his profile ahead of 2028. If I were a one world order conspiracy theorist, this would be my take.
2
HFB_To_You2 days ago
+1
Inclined to agree at this point.
1
PeonSanders2 days ago
+1
I don't think involvement in Iran is going to look good for anyone.
1
calstanfordboye2 days ago
+1
If America is dumb enough to elect that shitstain in 2028 then it honestly deserves him
1
HFB_To_You2 days ago
+2
67% of Trump voters have no college education.
There is no limit to their stupidity, nor to how vacuous much of the rest of the population is, including the politically disengaged.
2
T8ert0t2 days ago
+1
Vance is the used coffee filter in the machine you completely forget to empty, and then get freaked out and disgusted at the next time you make a new pot.
1
CuteWolves2 days ago
+1
Elevate? Lol little one
1
Disc0Disc0Disc02 days ago
+20
I found it interesting that apparently they wont even be in the same room. They will pass information/proposals back and forth with the intermediaries.
20
hastobeapoint2 days ago
+16
That's how the last round was like too, when Oman was mediating. And reportedly they were close to an agreement, until the Americans "flipped the table over" and launched an attack on feb 28
16
wdomeika2 days ago
+75
This is Trump killing off Vance. These talks are doomed from the get go. When they fail and the Iranians still control the Strait, he'll blame Vance...
and toss him like a old cheeseburger wrapper.
75
cuttlefish2 days ago
+31
Well, with the history of Iranian negotiators being assassinated, you may find yourself speaking literally rather than figuratively.
31
GoodIdea3212 days ago
+18
Maybe Vance decided to be a suicide bomber.
18
Aramis4442 days ago
+22
Trump: “Praise be to Allah!”
Vance: “Allahu akbar!”
22
GoodIdea3212 days ago
+9
Vance, secret muslim.
9
PaleInTexas2 days ago
+7
Would fill out lots of people's bingo brackets.
7
GoodIdea3212 days ago
+3
Of all the people who could hide what religion they actually hold, it seems like someone who has changed their name a few times and changed their religion a few times is a likely candidate.
3
Kezhen1 day ago
+1
Can you imagine the uproar if Obama had uttered either of these phrases?
1
GlobuleNamed2 days ago
+1
So the Pope all over again?
1
wdomeika2 days ago
+4
My hunch is that would work for Trump...
4
WittyTiger72 days ago
+2
Yeah my thoughts. I would be more concerned for his life currently then being ousted from being VP
2
CooCooClocksClan2 days ago
+3
I must have missed where Witkoff and Kushner were scapegoated and cast out for failing in negotiating earlier this year.
3
theboomboy2 days ago
+3
That would actually be great, I think
Vance is smarter and maybe more evil than Trump
3
Lenwa442 days ago
+14
Smarter, sure. Not a terribly high bar to begin with? More evil though I don't agree wtih
14
Rehydratedaussie2 days ago
+5
Maybe not more evil but if youre smarter and decide to tack your wagon to the evil express what does that make you? An evil idiot vs a more considered sycophant
5
wannabe-physicist2 days ago
+5
>if you’re smarter and decide to tack your wagon to the evil express what does that make you?
A giga opportunist, for one.
5
Lenwa442 days ago
+6
Theil and Vance have their own agenda and are just using Trump, like everybody else.
6
Muted-Mousse-15532 days ago
+7
> maybe more evil than Trump
I hate the guy but come on lmao
7
Kezhen1 day ago
+2
Even if he is more evil, I’ll take lawful evil over batshit chaotic evil. As a country we’re pretty accustomed to lawful evil.
2
theboomboy2 days ago
+3
In his intentions, not his past actions
That's also why I put a "maybe" there. I don't know and I don't think it's very likely, but maybe
3
Kezhen1 day ago
+1
Vance isn’t a pedophile as far as I know so I’d say he’s not as evil as Trump. I think he’s probably more “traditional republican” evil than batshit cartoon villain.
1
BAHatesToFly2 days ago
+30
Crazy that the dude who shat out Hillbilly Elegy is in charge of US Peace talks during wartime.
30
Fickassthuck2 days ago
+9
Probably better than the guy who got somebody else to write Art of the Deal at least.
9
008Zulu2 days ago
+8
It **is** America.
8
PablosCocaineHippo2 days ago
+6
This wet noodles isnt in charge of anything. He's a 5th tier puppet
6
Additional_Quiet26002 days ago
+22
If Iran provides a lot of couches, Vance might come around.
22
Siegorius2 days ago
+11
Around, inside, on the cover...
11
Easik2 days ago
+24
It's insane the level is misinformation. I read 3 hours ago that Iran refuses talks while Lebanon was being bombed. Lebanon was bombed like 4 hours ago.
24
Small-Experience-2252 days ago
+11
What about Iranian delegation arriving in Pakistan, videos and pics and all?
11
Easik2 days ago
+14
I'm not discrediting the claim that they arrived. I'm complaining that everyone is lying constantly and it's hard to keep it straight
14
Small-Experience-2252 days ago
+5
Gotcha. I definitely agree that everything's been exhausting. News coming from everywhere and we don't know who to trust
5
whyuhavtobemad2 days ago
Sounds like that's intentional
0
FewResearcher26062 days ago
+8
Because iran state media loves to lie. Shocking i know, but it's part of their propaganda machine.
(The following is a comment i posted a day ago, which still holds true:)
As an Iranian, the moment trump talked about peace deals two weeks ago, i knew it was ghalibaf (head of parliament and these negotiations) who was making contact with the USA.
but he denied it multiple times at that moment.
State media denied it too.
Now we have confirmation that he is indeed in talks, but since they want to save a face in front of their supporters (hardliners that they riled up with "no negotiations with USA" chants), they throw a tantrum saying if Lebanon isn't part of the deal they won't attend.
But they will, That's how mullahs Operate. They just lie to people all the time. This isn't something new for Iranians.
8
thefuzzhead2 days ago
+5
Maybe we're not so different after all
5
Easik2 days ago
+2
Can you share your insight on the outcome of the negotiations? Do you think they will agree to give up the enriched uranium? Do you think the US will bomb power plants and bridges?
2
FewResearcher26062 days ago
+4
They want to, but they have backed themselves into a corner.
Regime gets most of its power from the hardliners. The over religious families who consider supporting the regime their "holy duty".
Now, to rile them up and to make them defend against protesters (regime supporters have been in the streets for 40 days non stop in every city every night here) and to save a face, they talked a lot about how enrichment is their right, how Negotiations is sign of weakness and most importantly, and I'm not making this up, "victory is destined to them by their religion." So admitting a tie or a defeat is impossible. This also applies to supporting proxies and fighting isreal.
Here is the problem now, a rational mind would say "good, i can get a good deal by giving away enrichment that my country doesn't even need at all". But that would mean actually admitting they are backing away from what i said above and not honoring the words of dead ayatollah.
They already created a large dissatisfaction among their followers and by agreeing to these talks in the first place, now imagine how their supporters would react if they make a deal with the " great satan" and "killer of Khamenei".
But at the same time, Ghalibaf is eying the presidency for next term (he didn't get more than a few million votes last time) so he needs this talks to be successful. Same as the new Ayatollah he wants to live unlike his father.
Now, considering what i said above, here is what i think will happen if negotiations go through:
They will not agree to no enrichment, unless USA gives them both sanction lift and control of hormoz.
Or they will agree to low level enrichment, without control of the hormoz but still demand lift of the sanctions.
Talks will fail if Israel pushes for iran to acknowledge them as a country. Iran will not agree with that ever. For the hardliner and religious and reasons i mentioned. Same as supporting proxies, those will not happen. Iran burned the bridges of being a normal country long ago.
But Ultimately, i think talks will be successful, but don't expect iran to agree to all of the 15 points that Trump demands. They won't agree to all of the terms it even if you fill their pockets with billions every minute.
JD Vance needs this W for 2028 too, so he should control trump mood swings and lower his expectations if he wants the deal, otherwise i will get to play Fallout 5 Irl.
TLDR: talks will be successful, just don't expect this deal to cover every thing trump demands. Iran acts like they don't want for the sake of its own supporters, but they want it bad.
4
IceMysterious30562 days ago
+7
Why can’t they all just hop on a Zoom call or something.
7
Gecks7772 days ago
+2
With a charmer like Vance taking the lead how could the talks fail?
2
PossessedToSkate2 days ago
+2
I hope they're wearing suits.
2
copperblood2 days ago
+2
No Islamabad couch is safe! What happens in Islamabad stays in Islamabad
2
roguedriver2 days ago
+1
They'll rename it Islamacouch when he's done.
1
IncreaseArtistic95882 days ago
+2
Can we be real this meeting is going to go nowhere. All this hopium was to prop up Friday's stock markets, considering POTUS shilled for a stock today.
The strait will stay closed with tolls and fighting in Lebanon will continue. As for US Iran it's over as troops leave in 2 weeks.
2
Fun-Astronomer53112 days ago
+1
How many anti missiles or anti-aircraft systems did they deploy?
1
CraigGregory2 days ago
+1
He must be looking forward to those Persian couches..
1
Desecrated_Potato2 days ago
+1
What are the chances this goes well?
1
AccordingInsect34812 days ago
+1
Chuckles. President Pedofiles will ruin it with one tweet.
1
Raven5862 days ago
+1
What could possibly go wrong!
1
Curious_Cousin_me2 days ago
+1
An Iranian delegation and the US VP meeting in Pakistan? This sounds like the start of a thriller movie where everyone has a hidden agenda.Let's see if this is actual diplomacy or just a very expensive high-altitude photo-op.
1
MikeSteamer2 days ago
+1
Tone-deaf and Alzheimers Vance said live on TV that if Iran negotiates in good faith (!), the US will reach out with the open hand (ummm to slap them like the two last times?)
1
brendanm45452 days ago
+1
The deal is going to be a bad one for the USA so trump wants nothing to do with it. In the future if vance is ever disloyal he will pin the Iran deal on him.
1
Soft_Author25931 day ago
+1
I have never been to Islamabad and I don't know how good accomodation is over there, I just hope they at least have a couch for him to crush on, because he might be staying for a while
1
pindamoney2 days ago
+1
Imagine Israel blows up the center when they land and blames it on Hezbollah.
103 Comments